21 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in Cultural Marxism, feminism, Feminists, free speech, history, History for newbies, jewed culture, jewed economics, jewed education system, jewed politics, jewish criminality, Jewish Tyranny, Jewish World Revolution, Kaganovich, Karl Marx, Marx, Marxism, nation-building/nation-wrecking, political correctness, Socrates, Soviet holocaust, Soviet propaganda, Soviet Union, Stalin, universities at 4:39 pm | Permanent Link

If you’re going to remake the world, you must first remake the words, so that the new words can help you accomplish your political/racial agenda. That’s what Political Correctness (P.C., a.k.a. Cultural Marxism) is all about [1]. It’s “Marxism meets language.” It amounts to a handful of people (e.g., newspaper owners/editors, news columnists and university administrators, most of whom are Jews) telling Americans what they can, and can’t, say. It’s totalitarianism violating free speech.

The term “Political Correctness” came from the Soviet Union, and P.C. is based upon lies and deceit [2][3]. Among the first modern usages of the term “Politically Correct” — in a positive way — was by the Jewish feminist leader Karen DeCrow (real name Lipschultz) in 1975. (Among her other activities, DeCrow pressured NASA to recruit more women).

Like all forms of leftism, P.C. is very contradictory: on the one hand, it tries to make all humans appear to be equal; but at the same time, it tries to make White people look bad. It tries to do both at once. (The anti-racism movement is similarly contradictive, i.e., on the one hand, it says that Blacks are equal to Whites; but at the same time, it says that Blacks need Affirmative Action and six different kinds of welfare, even today; which claim is the truth?).

Cultural Marxism is a sub-ideology of The Frankfurt School’s “Critical Theory.” P.C. is part of Cultural Marxism (I call P.C. the “yolk” inside of the Cultural Marxist “egg”). In other words, P.C. is a Jewish movement.

It’s amazing that P.C. is tolerated in America, a country that supposedly values free speech above almost anything else. (P.C. is illegal if enforced by authority figures, since it violates the First Amendment right to free speech; university administrators are actually violating the Constitution when they enforce P.C. doctrines).

A few examples of Politically Correct words/phrases:

“Negro” or “Black”: You can’t say those words anymore. Now, the word is “African-American.” (But interestingly, Whites can be “African-American” as well. If they were born in South Africa and later moved to America, they’re “African-American”).

“Homosexual”: No, you can’t say that now, either. The word is “gay.”

“Oriental” or “Chinaman”: No. Now, it’s “Asian.”

“Illegal Alien”: No. Now, it’s “undocumented immigrant/migrant” or even “pre-American-citizen.”

“Disabled”: No. Now, it’s “physically challenged” or “differently abled.”

“Retarded”: No. Now, it’s “mentally challenged” or “developmentally challenged.”

“Policewoman”: You can’t say that anymore. Now, it’s always “police officer.”

.

[1] i.e., Marxism applied to culture rather than to economics

[2] Paraphrasing an old, infamous Soviet dialogue:
Soviet official #1: “That information is not factually correct.” Soviet official #2: “You’re right. But it is politically correct.” P.C. usually involves language/speech, whereas Cultural Marxism usually involves more physical actions, e.g., creating multicultural TV shows or filling up White schools with Brown and Black people. I like to think of P.C. as the “language part” of Cultural Marxism. As America becomes more violent and unstable due to ethnic conflict, it will become a Western version of the Soviet Union. Guaranteed.

[3] Trivia: the Soviet Union was created by Jewish revolutionaries in 1917. It was the first criminal state. All of its leaders had been in jail or prison. Vladimir Lenin was part-Jewish. Lev Kamenev, first head of state of Soviet Russia, was also part-Jewish. Leon Trotsky, the supreme commander of the Soviet Red Army, was a Jew, as was the head of the political section of the Soviet Red Army, Yan Gamarnik, as was the Soviet Finance Commissar, Grigori Sokolnikov. Three-quarters of the first Soviet Politburo was made up of either Jews or part-Jews. The head and the sub-head of the Soviet Comintern, Grigori Zinoviev and Osip Piatnitsky, were both Jews. The official Soviet newspaper, Pravda, was run by a Jew, Lev Mekhlis, who was also Joe Stalin’s secretary, personal assistant and close confidant, and Mekhlis was also an important political commissar who was in charge of “rooting out the political enemies of Stalin” in the Soviet Union. The man in charge of “genociding” the Ukraine was also a Jew, Lazar Kaganovich, who was one of Stalin’s top henchmen

21 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in Socrates, William Pierce, William Pierce Wednesday at 12:48 pm | Permanent Link

(This week’s William Pierce Wednesday item is being posted today instead)

by Dr. William Pierce.

[…]

“And of course, “a new internationalism” is simply his way of saying “a New World Order.” And that really is a radical departure from the past, when America and Britain went to war to defend what they considered their national interests, not to impose “a new internationalism” on some other country which just wanted to be left alone. It’s good for America’s soldiers to understand that the reason they’re deliberately bombing civilian targets in Belgrade, shooting up passenger trains, and so on — and occasionally even risking their own lives — is to impose “a new internationalism” on the Serbs. To people like Estrich and Blair and Clinton, having armed forces for the purpose of national defense is old fashioned, an outmoded, 20th-century concept. The really trendy thing now — the 21st-century thing — is to use your armed forces to impose the will of the New World Order on countries too small to hit back.

“Bambi” also said in the April 19 Newsweek that the Serb policy of ethnic cleansing must not only be stopped but also “reversed.” Which really ties in with the insistence of the whole New World Order crowd that no ethnically clean countries will be tolerated in the 21st century. Only “multicultural” countries will be permitted.”

[Article].

20 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in children, children-used-for-leftist-propaganda, illegal immigration, immigration, jewed culture, jewed politics, leftism, leftists, leftists-as-liars, liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, propaganda, Socrates at 11:21 am | Permanent Link

What kind of people use lies about children in order to ruin America? Evil people, that’s what kind — namely, leftists and Jews.

When they want to accomplish a political/racial goal, the leftists and the Jews know that they should invoke “the children” whenever possible. For example, they’ll say “Children are suffering!” “Children are starving!” “Children are being eaten by the Ku Klux Klan!” and so on and so forth. And the bigger the lie about children, the better the outcome.

[Article].

19 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in "gay marriage", "gay", Britain, England, Gertrude Stein, homosexual themes, homosexuals, jewed culture, propaganda, Socrates at 12:06 pm | Permanent Link

(Above: hey, it’s Joe! Uhh, wait a second…no, it’s Gertrude…an easy mistake to make)

Britain: another White country going to hell in a handbasket. (The Jewish writer, Gertrude Stein, coined the term “gay” as a very inaccurate label for homosexuals [1]. They aren’t happy people. In fact, suicide rates for queers are much higher than for normal people).

[Article].
.

[1] see Stein’s 1922 story “Miss Furr and Miss Skeene”

18 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in 'hate', 'hate' haters, constitution, constitutional rights, dispossession & destruction, Diversity, diversity is hate, First Amendment, free speech, military, nation-building/nation-wrecking, niggers, racism accusations, Socrates, War On White People at 3:01 pm | Permanent Link

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech” — the First Amendment, in the Bill of Rights. (That’s “Rights,” not suggestions. Written in ink).

This White woman’s language about “niggers” isn’t the issue at all. Free speech is the issue. When was the First Amendment right to free speech voided? Last week? Last month? Web searches reveal no such voiding by any court. Let’s face it: Americans have lost their free speech right. Which right will be the next to fall? The Second Amendment? (It’s funny how liberals can say the most outrageous things without being punished, but one “n-word” from a White voids all of the rights that that person has. It’s almost as if negroes are “holy” people).

[Article].

17 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in banking, capitalism, far-right politics, Fascism, free trade, global vs. local/regional, globalization, National Socialism, nationalism, populism, socialism, Socrates, Western civilization, Western culture, Western preservation ideas, white nationalism, White philosophy, White thought at 2:10 pm | Permanent Link

Capitalism only works when everyone is a “traditional White male.” Add Jews, Asians, greedy/immoral Whites, leftists, feminists and “free trade” to the mix and the whole game is ruined.

“Right-Wing populism is gaining traction in America and the rest of the West. The sentiment that many Whites in the West feel correctly affirms that their countries have been sold out to international banking, globalism, and the ethnic and gender activists operating under the banner of cultural Marxism. The central tenet of Populism is the empowerment of the working and middle classes. The appropriate response of the West is economic nationalism (where the West itself is seen as a nation), ending immigration from non-Western countries and beginning the process of repatriation, and the establishment of a centralized financial system dedicated to economic nationalism.”

[Article].

16 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in "civil rights", America, America the White nation, America's founders, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Civil Rights Act of 1968, civil rights movement, counterculture, First Amendment, freedom, freedom of association, Socrates, Trump, Trump and Making America Great Again, Trump's policies at 2:58 pm | Permanent Link

Hollywood director Ron Howard asked, “to what era would America go back to in order to ‘make America great again'”? [1].

That’s easy to answer: before the mid-1960s, because that’s when America began to unravel like a ball of yarn. (Granted, it would be better if America went back to the 1950s or even earlier, but the 1960s is when things really began turning to crap, e.g., the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ruined America by violating the First Amendment right of White people to freedom of association, among other things)[3].

.
[1] Howard said on June 14, 2018: “Honest question to #MAGA minders. When was America at its greatest? Can you tell me an era that reflects the “Again” that you hope we return to?”
https://twitter.com/RealRonHoward/status/1007220174414581761

[2] those who are interested in the origins of the 1960s Jewish-led counterculture movement can read the 1998 book “The Culture of Critique” by Dr. Kevin MacDonald, an online .PDF book

[3] “Legally, the freedom of association is considered to be a fundamental right protected by the Constitution. In the Supreme Court case of N.A.A.C.P. v. Alabama (1958), a unanimous Court ruled that the NAACP did not have to reveal to the Alabama attorney general the names and addresses of the NAACP members in the state because it would violate the NAACP members’ freedom of association” [Here]. Furthermore, the United States of America is a Western country. That means it’s a White country. Founded by Whites. That means that Whites have “natural seniority” over Black and Brown people. Whites have (or should have) a higher social and legal status by default. Civil-rights laws violate that natural seniority

22 May, 2018

Posted by Socrates in jewed finance, Jewish behavior versus White behavior, Jewish brain features, Jewish money-magic, Socrates at 11:26 am | Permanent Link

Jew: “Now, pay attention. I’m only gonna show you this once. Abracadabra, presto-change-o, I wave my magic wand! (*poof*) There’s 10 million dollars! (*poof*) There’s another 10 million dollars! (*poof*) And another 20 million dollars, and (*poof*) there’s 30 million dollars!”

Gentile: “Hold on, slow down, jeez, I’m getting dizzy here!”

[Webpage] and [Article] and [Article] and [Article].

21 May, 2018

Posted by Socrates in 'hate', 'hate' crimes, 'hate' haters, 'hate' laws, Britain, egalitarianism, England, equality, equalocracy, government mandates, government power, government tyranny, jewed culture, jewed law, Socrates, UK at 2:04 pm | Permanent Link

“The Sentencing Council for England and Wales has drafted changes to public order offences, including anyone perceived as targeting online a “protected characteristics” including “race; sex; disability; age; sexual orientation; religion or belief; pregnancy and maternity; and gender reassignment.”

By the way, in the UK, “hate crime” laws came from Jews, e.g., “Sir” Frank Soskice, Anthony Lester and Leon Brittanisky (a.k.a. Brittan).

[Article].

21 May, 2018

Posted by Socrates in egalitarianism, equality, equalocracy, leftism, leftists, liberal mindset, liberalism, private property, Seattle, Socrates, Soviet Union at 1:34 pm | Permanent Link

“The Fair Chance Housing Ordinance, on the other hand, forbids landlords from checking criminal background or considering prior criminal convictions when selecting tenants.”

Want to rent a room to a Black murderer? In the Soviet Union, you had no private-property rights. You don’t have any in Seattle, either. “Swastika tattoos” aside, this article gives a good insight into the leftist (totalitarian) mindset. Leftists want the government to make everyone “equal”, your freedoms be damned. Look for more cities to adopt such laws.

[Article].