23 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in Diversity, diversity is hate, Fourteenth Amendment, jewed culture, jewed media, miscegenation, miscegenation's monsters, mixed-race people/mystery meat, mulattoes, multiculturalism, nation-building/nation-wrecking, race, race and health, race-mixing, race-mixing laws, Socrates at 2:02 pm | Permanent Link

(Above: the late mixed-race singer Bob Marley; he was bullied as a child due to his odd ethnicity).

It’s portrayed in the media and Hollywood as being really hip and cool: being of mixed race (very often White/Black, but sometimes White/other or even White/other/other) [1]. But the truth is quite the opposite. People of mixed race have higher rates of suicide and illegal drug use, and are usually less accepted by their peers due to their unusual ethnicities, and as a result they usually have poor self-images. That isn’t surprising – in fact, it makes perfect sense. Really, it must be very confusing being of mixed race. Are you White? Black? Which ethnicity is the dominant one? In other words, which ethnicity is “the real you”? It must be very weird inside the brain of a mixed-race person; they no doubt feel “divided,” like two or even three people within one body. Freaky!
.

[1] marriage between Whites/Blacks/others was illegal in the U.S. (in some states, at least) until 1967. But since the Fourteenth Amendment wasn’t ratified properly, mixed-race marriage should still be illegal

22 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in Federal Reserve system, jewed economics, jewed finance, money, Paul Warburg, Socrates at 4:05 pm | Permanent Link

A review of the book “The Creature From Jekyll Island” by G. Edward Griffin: [Here].

The book (a PDF file).

(The Jewish banker Paul M. Warburg mentioned as being responsible for the creation of the Federal Reserve system: [Here]).

21 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in anti-White themes, Cultural Marxism, dispossession & destruction, Diversity, diversity is hate, jewed culture, jewed media, Madison Avenue, race, race-mixing, Socrates, tv, TV culture, War On White People at 2:02 pm | Permanent Link

Do you have a relative who still watches TV? Why not suggest to him/her: “unplug your TV and read books instead. It’ll save your brain and save you money, too.”

The Jews on Madison Avenue (i.e., the advertising industry located in New York City) apparently think it’s big fun to create domestic-themed TV commercials featuring mixed-race couples (very often, the wife is White but the husband is Black; they’re usually sitting at a table, happily munching on fast food; a variation of that is a White mother hugging/doting on her child of questionable ethnicity). This sickening, anti-White trend is getting worse and worse every year. (Today, 90% of all TV commercials have negroes in them, yet Blacks make up only 12% of the U.S. population – figure that one out!).

[Video] and [Article].

20 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in Chile, Fascism, fascism accusations, fascism vs. communism, France, jew mentality, Jewish behavior versus White behavior, Jewish brain features, Jewish nation-wrecking, Jewish Tyranny, Jewish World Revolution, left-wing vs. right-wing rule, leftism, leftists, liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, liberals-as-children, nation-building/nation-wrecking, Nazi era, Nazis, Socrates, Soviet Union, Trump, Trump-as-a-fascist, Trumpphobia, Venezuela at 3:06 pm | Permanent Link

You’ve heard the Jews and their useful idiots, the leftists, warning about Donald Trump and his “fascism”; some of them have even threatened to move to Canada as a result of Trump’s presidency (I don’t know if any have done so).

But do the leftists and the Jews really have anything to worry about regarding Trump or similar “fascists”? Let’s consider that:

When the Nazis controlled France beginning in 1940, did they wreck the country as some people expected? No, just the opposite: they were very conservative in their actions and deeds. They behaved like adults and practiced moderation and temperance – in fact, life in France hardly changed for most of the citizens (it was “allied” bombing that leveled buildings in France, not Nazi policies [1]).

However, when the Left takes control of a country, it will be ruined sooner or later. Guaranteed. Because leftists, like children, have no self-restraint or temperance. They are kids in adult bodies. Examples abound: France circa 1790; Chile in 1972-1973. Venezuela is in ruins today and the citizens are eating mice and lizards in order to survive. The Left, paraphrasing someone, will always “drive a country over a cliff.” Remember that whenever you see leftists and Jews moaning about “fascist right-wingers” who pose a “danger” to the free world. It’s quite the opposite: it’s the leftists and the Jews who are the destroyers of civilization. If you care about preserving White Western culture, you must work hard to prevent leftists and Jews from achieving political power. (In fact, wise White leaders would jail, or expel, leftists and Jews, but lucky for them there aren’t any wise White leaders).
.

[1] “In all, 1,570 French cities and towns were bombed by Anglo-American forces between June 1940 and May 1945” — Wikipedia

19 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in alt-Right, Socrates, White activism, White campaigns, white nationalism, White Nationalists, White philosophy, White thought at 5:40 pm | Permanent Link

Video of his speech at Auburn [Here]. Note Spencer’s speaking style: calm, friendly, easy-going — a style that, in my opinion, should be adopted by WNs. Shouting and arguing won’t win people over to our side. But some may disagree with that opinion…to each his own.

The Q & A session [Here].

About Spencer’s speech, which Auburn did not want to happen: [Here].

19 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in Socrates, William Pierce, William Pierce Wednesday at 4:19 pm | Permanent Link

by Dr. William Pierce.

[…]

“One hundred thirty years ago, right after the Civil War, we could have ended this problem peacefully. We could have sent them (Blacks) all back to Africa. But we put it off, and now we’ve lost the opportunity for any peaceful resolution. In fact, we’ve lost the opportunity for a peaceful resolution to a lot of other problems. We let things slide to the point that we no longer can vote our way out. The two-thirds of the population which approves of Bill Clinton and thinks that he shouldn’t be impeached just for lying about a few cigar tricks he did in the White House has got the decent, hardheaded people outnumbered now. The feminists and the queers and the welfare rabble and the non-Whites, together with the part of the White population which will vote for anybody who promises them more ball games on TV, can outvote the rest of us. And that’s exactly what they’ll do, shepherded by the Jewish media bosses. They’ll destroy what’s left of our civilization. They’ll take us straight to hell, because all they care about is hanging onto the perks they’re getting from the system. That’s really all they care about.”

[Article].

19 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in anti-fascists/antifas, left-wing violence, leftism, leftists, liberal 'tolerance', liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, Social Justice Warriors (SJWs), Socrates, White activism, white nationalism, White Nationalists at 12:42 pm | Permanent Link

Reading the federal law, it seems that the U.S. Justice Department could, if it wanted to, charge “antifa” people with federal criminal conspiracies. Since nationalists have been charged with crimes under the flimsiest of “rights violation” excuses, federal charges could also go the other way, huh? (Newbies, most political violence in the world comes from leftists, not rightists, an interesting fact given the Left’s frequent claim of being more “tolerant” than the Right). Anyway, here’s the federal law:

“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States…They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;”

[Article] and [Article].

More here: [Article].

16 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in America, America the White nation, America's founders, anti-White themes, college, Cultural Marxism, democracy, democrazy, First Amendment, free speech, leftism, leftists, liberal 'tolerance', liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, political correctness, republic vs. democracy, republican government, Socrates, universities at 2:31 pm | Permanent Link

“The founding fathers put free speech in the Constitution” — well, it’s interesting that college liberals would acknowledge 118 politically-incorrect White men who would be very angry at the censorship of White speech on college campuses today!

But really, someone needs to explain to the thousands of college loonies that America is a republic which, unlike a democracy, holds fast to the constitution, which in this case guarantees freedom of speech even if that speech may not be popular with certain people [1]. You know, it’s truly crazy: when a leftist on a college campus talks about “free speech,” he doesn’t mean any free speech, he means “speech that he and his liberal friends, who dominate campus discourse, agree with.” If they don’t agree with your speech, then it’s not free speech, and you “can’t” say it, and the constitution be damned! But newbies, make no mistake: in our White republic, the First Amendment guarantees all speech, not just speech that the liberals want to hear. It’s your constitutional right to say “racist” and “xenophobic” things. If someone censors your White free speech, find a lawyer who will represent you pro bono and file a lawsuit.

[Article]. [Update: original link is broken; try This One].
.

[1] a republic is a constitutionally-protected country with constitutionally-limited governmental power. A democracy has no real limits other than what the majority (51%-or-more of a decision-making body, or the mass of the people) wants – in other words, your rights hinge on “mob rule” decisions made next week or next month, and not on the protections of a written constitution. The old saying, “democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding on what to have for dinner” is apt here: the sheep loses by default because he’s outnumbered, just like “normal White people” are outnumbered on college campuses; (it’s the liberals who are always calling America a “democracy”)

15 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in Africa, African National Congress, anti-White themes, apartheid, black nationalism, black rule, communism, dispossession & destruction, Diversity, diversity is hate, jewed culture, jewed politics, Marxism, nation-building/nation-wrecking, Slovo, Socrates, South Africa at 3:26 pm | Permanent Link

(Above: the communist Jews, Joe Slovo and his wife, Ruth First, several years before First became [briefly] airborne via a mail bomb. Today, Slovo and First are portrayed as heroes in South Africa – destroying a successful, stable White country is a good thing, apparently).

Actually, make that “could be facing more trouble” because they’ve been facing it almost constantly since 1994 (when Whites stupidly agreed to give the Blacks political power). Now South Africa is in the toilet due to Black rule and thousands of Whites have fled to other countries. No Black-ruled country has ever been successful; S.A. will eventually collapse entirely. Newbies: there’s only one name that you need to know regarding the wrecking of South Africa: Joe Slovo. He was the Jew who, more than anyone else, delivered S.A. to the Blacks. Communist Jews led the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa; even though S.A. had a common-sense law called the Suppression of Communism Act, it failed to stop the Jews from wrecking S.A. and the law was later repealed.

[Article].

More about the Jewing of S.A. [Here].

14 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in "war on terror", 'Middle East', Afghanistan, Mossad, Socrates, war, war as a racket, War On Israel's Enemies, Zionism at 5:49 pm | Permanent Link

U.S. General #1: “We aren’t winning the war in Afghanistan. We’ve been there for 37 years, 9 months and 18 days. Do you call that ‘winning’?”

U.S. General #2: “I know, I know, but what the hell can we do??”

U.S. General #3: “I’ve got an idea: let’s drop a super-duper-mega-huge bomb on Afghanistan and then call it a ‘wonderful success’ — the people will believe it.”

U.S. General #1: “Hey, that’s a great idea. Pretty sneaky!”

U.S. General #3: “Thanks. I was trained in Israel by Mossad.”

[Article].