11 December, 2018

Posted by Socrates in "civil rights", America, America the White nation, America's founders, Civil Rights Act of 1964, civil rights movement, democracy, democracy in Athens, democrazy, jewed culture, jewed politics, republic vs. democracy, republican government, Roosevelt, Roosevelt's Jewish cabal, Socrates, voting at 3:21 pm | Permanent Link

Democracy is dangerous. It isn’t what our founders gave us. Democracy can be defined as “any idiot can vote.” Our founders didn’t want negroes and retards to vote. Although President Woodrow Wilson used the word “democracy” in a speech in 1917, he was talking about the world, not specifically the U.S.A. [1]; president Franklin D. Roosevelt popularized the idea that America is a democracy, not a White republic (for example, he used the word “democracy” 9 times in one speech in 1941, and in that speech he referred to America as “this democracy”) [2][3]; Roosevelt’s chief speechwriter and key advisor was a Jew: Samuel I. Rosenman [4].

[Article].

.

[1] “The world must be made safe for democracy” — Wilson

[2] Franklin D. Roosevelt, third inaugural address, January 20, 1941

[3] America became a democracy with the “civil rights” laws of the 1960s; that of course went against the wishes of America’s founders, who gave us a White republic where only White male landowners could vote or hold office

[4] “…there were few matters in which Mr. Rosenman was not consulted” by president Roosevelt (from Rosenman’s obituary, New York Times, June 25, 1973)

10 December, 2018

Posted by Socrates in brown culture, Brown Man, Frankfurt School, genocide of White culture, global citizens, global citizenship/world citizenship, global government, global vs. local/regional, immigration, jewed immigration policy, jewed politics, Jewish behavior versus White behavior, Jewish brain features, Jewish chosenness, Jewish Tyranny, Jewish World Revolution, Jews-as-godlike, Leo Pasvolsky, Max Horkheimer, nation, nation-building/nation-wrecking, nation-states, New World Order, NWO, Socrates, sovereignty, treaties, UN, UN Charter, UN founders, War On White People at 3:22 pm | Permanent Link

(Above: the architect of the UN, the Jew, Leo Pasvolsky, at center of photo, smoking a pipe)

The JewN strikes again! It’s making the world safe for Marxism: One world. One government. One people. One currency. No borders. And everyone is a Brown “robot” marching in lock-step to orders from a global parliament. It’s the communist Jew Max Horkheimer’s dream come true. (The UN is an illegal entity. Global government violates the natural sovereignty of nations [a “nation” means “people who are alike”]. But what about treaties and pacts, you might wonder? Aren’t they legal? Well, who signs treaties and pacts? Right. Government bureaucrats sign them. The people of the nation don’t sign them).

Yeah, sure, they say that this migration pact is “non-binding.” Oh, really? Then why, why, pray tell, create and sign the pact? Hmmmm? Because such pacts carry significant political weight and they also set a political precedent.

The best quote I’ve seen yet about immigration: “Countries which import the third world will become the third world.”

“Safe migration”? That’s Judeo-left propaganda. “Regular migration”? Who would want that?

“U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres said migration needed better management and rich countries would benefit. “In the many places where fertility is declining and life expectancy is rising, economies will stagnate and people will suffer without migration,” he said in his opening address.”

That’s pure leftist bullshit. “Migration” never benefits Whites. It only benefits Browns. That’s the whole idea behind the New World Order: to destroy the Western world so that “Nazism” can never return and threaten God’s Pests/the self-chosen people.

[Article].

9 December, 2018

Posted by Socrates in French Revolution, leftists, leftists-as-liars, liberal 'tolerance', liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, liberals-as-children, Marcuse, Marx, Marxism, Socrates, the Judeo-Left at 4:46 pm | Permanent Link

(Above: a California Proposition 65 warning sticker)

I bought a tool at a hardware store. On the package, there was a sticker, which read: “Warning: this product contains chemicals which are known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, etc.” Bullshit. It’s a solid-steel object. Unless you file or drill the object (which I, and most other people, won’t do), you can’t inhale or ingest the object.

The wackos in California who sponsored that law and created that sticker are the very same people who claim to be easy-going, “live and let live” people. They claim to be for freedom, free choice, peace, easy living, “keeping the government out of your bedroom,” etc. Sounds good, but no, liberals aren’t for freedom and free choice at all. Just the opposite! Liberals are control freaks — in this case, trying to control or at least influence which products you buy [1]. Those liberals are the same people who censor all of the social media. The same people who created unconstitutional speech codes on college campuses. The same people who want to ban guns, knives, slingshots and pea-shooters. Liberals are not tolerant people. Just the opposite. They are intolerant control freaks, power freaks, liars and bullies. They are arrogant children posing as adults, and these children, of course, don’t think logically. You can’t have freedom and liberals at the same time and in the same place. Their “god” is governmental power and control. That governmental power and control is their “answer” to all “problems” — real or imagined. Liberal politicians are Stalinists posing as normal people. (It must cost the state of California many, many millions of tax dollars per year to enforce Proposition 65. By the way, other states must comply with Prop. 65 in order to sell goods there).
.

[1] It might be asked by newbies: “Where did liberalism come from?” Some would say “from The Enlightenment.” Others would say “from The French Revolution.” Still others would say “from Karl Marx.” I say that liberalism, as we know it and understand it today, came from the yelling-and-screaming, 1960s “New Left” liberalism, which was almost entirely Jewish and which focused on feminism, homosexual rights, abortion rights, college campus activism, etc. The communist Jew, Herbert Marcuse, is the “father” of the New Left with his 1964 book “One-Dimensional Man”

9 December, 2018

Posted by Socrates in communism, Cultural Marxism, Eastern Europe, Germany, jewed culture, jewed education system, Jewish genetics, Marxism, Socrates, Weimar Germany at 1:07 pm | Permanent Link

A group founded/run by a Marxist Jew named Anetta Kahane has published a school pamphlet aimed at weeding out right-wing children and their parents [1]. Why is this…person allowed to do that? Shouldn’t White people control the content of public schools in White countries? Man, it’s Weimar Germany all over again.

[Article].
.

[1] “Between 1974 and 1982, Kahane served as an unofficial collaborator of the Ministry for State Security (Stasi) in East Germany under the code name “Victoria”. Stasi files connected to her work include more than 800 pages of reports. Among others, Kahane surveilled artists, students from West Berlin universities and West German television reporters.” — Wikipedia

8 December, 2018

Posted by Socrates in Adorno, Frankfurt School, intellectuals, international Jewry, intjewlectuals, jewed culture, Jewed philosophy, jewed politics, jewish hate & hypocrisy, Marx, Mexico, shabbos goys, Socrates, Trump, Trump-as-a-fascist, Trumpphobia at 4:17 pm | Permanent Link

Intjewlectuals have big brains so they can quote Karl Marx and Theodor Adorno chapter and verse! Only people with giant brains can do that. Don’t try it yourself. You could sprain your frontal lobe. Quick: how many intjewlectuals does it take to screw in a light bulb? None. They have plenty of goy staffers to do that for them.

[Article].

8 December, 2018

Posted by Socrates in Argentina, Argentina's Dirty War, communism, double standards, international Jewry, international socialism, left-wing violence, left-wing vs. right-wing rule, leftist/liberal cruelty, Marxism, Nicaragua, Rhodesia, Socrates at 1:28 pm | Permanent Link

(Above: Argentine leader Jorge Videla, circa 1977. Videla tried to save Argentina from destruction. His reward for that? He was sentenced to life in prison, where he died in 2013. Contrast his fate to that of the Marxist leader Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua: his Sandinista thugs murdered thousands of people, yet he was never punished for that. Why not? The answer, of course, is that leftists are never punished for anything).

What do you do when leftists are literally tearing your country apart? You go to war with them, which is what the Argentine government did in 1976 [1][2].

Will Argentina’s necessary, but short-lived, Dirty War (1976-1983) be re-played in parts of the West? It might be. One of the things that the good guys did in the Dirty War was to fire all the leftist university professors and replace them with military men. Sadly, the Dirty War didn’t save Argentina [3]. It only delayed the rot. It didn’t actually stop anything.

[Article].
.

[1] in 1975, leftist bombs were exploding every 4 hours in Buenos Aires

[2] parts of the Dirty War have already happened in America, e.g., the assassinations of police officers by non-Whites or leftists

[3] the Dirty War would have been successful if not for “international pressure” on the Argentine government — the same international pressure that ended apartheid in South Africa and dismantled Rhodesia

7 December, 2018

Posted by Socrates in ACLU, Cultural Marxism, Frankfurt School, jewed culture, jewed politics, leftism, leftists, liberalism, liberals, Marxism, NAACP founders, Socrates at 4:00 pm | Permanent Link

“Free speech in the United States is scarcely limited; the only restrictions are on speech which incites immediate violence. Nowhere else in the world is this liberty so protected.1 In fact, as we will see, even many of our fellow American citizens do not share this value.”

Metzger said that the West will stand or fall on the fate of America. He’s probably right.

Anyway, some people call it leftism, but a more accurate word is Jewdism (it’s been Jewed by the Jews!), since the Left was built by Jews, especially in America; after all, leftism is just watered-down Marxism.

[Article].

7 December, 2018

Posted by Socrates in Cultural Marxism, egalitarianism, equality, feminism, feminization of the West, Socrates, women, women and 'equality', women and emoting, women in the workforce, women-as-children at 2:22 pm | Permanent Link

Are you a man? Did you offend a woman at your workplace? Well, that’s the end of your career. [Article].

6 December, 2018

Posted by Socrates in Cultural Marxism, egalitarianism, equality, equalocracy, fake 'equality', feminism, feminism as fraudulent, feminization of the West, jewed culture, jewed media, Jewed workplaces, Socrates at 2:45 pm | Permanent Link

(The Woman and her Jewish management team, in the locker room just before the big fight: The Woman: “Hold The Man tight! Now, roll up his sleeve…hand me that syringe…he won’t be the world champion much longer!”)

(Minutes later):

Boxing announcer: “Oh, my god! Look at this! The Woman is beating the hell out of The Man! What a fight! It’s more like a massacre! You’re watching boxing history being made, folks! The Man is on the mat, and he’s down for the count! 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10…and he’s out! The Woman wins the fight! What a historic battle of the sexes!”

(Later)

The Man’s manager: “Wait! Hold it! I have just discovered that The Man was drugged just before the fight! Look! Here’s the empty hypodermic syringe! I also found security-camera footage showing the actual drugging committed by The Woman and her Jewish henchmen!”

The Media: “You and The Man are just sexists! You hate women, and Jews! Your silly accusations against The Woman are totally false!”

Hollywood: “Liar! The Woman won the fight fair and square!”

The Left: “Sexism! Misogyny! Nazism! Hate!”

The Woman: “I won the fight based solely on my ability! Repeat: solely on my ability! No one can say otherwise! How dare anyone question my skills as a fighter — that’s sexist hate speech! I’m just as tough as any man! I’m the new boxing champion of the world! Deal with it!”

[Article], [Article] and [Article].

5 December, 2018

Posted by Socrates in Socrates, William Pierce, William Pierce Wednesday at 2:50 pm | Permanent Link

by Dr. William Pierce.

[…]

“So, cultural continuity, the teaching of techniques, and building character: those are the three fundamental purposes of our schools — or rather those ought to be the purposes of our schools. Unfortunately, the American educational system today completely neglects the third purpose and does rather poorly with the first two. Take cultural continuity, for example. How can the schools serve this purpose well when they cannot even answer the question as to whose culture is to be passed on to the next generation? In a society trying very hard to be multicultural the question is really not Politically Correct.

I must say that some of the new charter schools set up for Black students are serving this purpose much better than any White schools. Some of these Black charter schools are thoroughly Afrocentric, and they at least give the young Blacks a strong sense of identity, if nothing else.”

[Article].