Vanguard News Network

You have a “civil right” to be a nursing assistant and to aid certain people at certain times. It’s true. Just ask Manny Celler:

[Article].

by Dr. William Pierce.

[...]

“All of that is true. So, then, why don’t I just complain about the plutocrats or the lawyers or the businessmen? Why do I single out the Jews? The answer to that is that if we don’t look at the Jews specifically, if we don’t try to understand them as Jews, then we can never really understand what is happening to our race and our civilization. And if we don’t understand what’s happening, we’re much less likely to be able to change things for the better. We need to understand the process, and in order to understand the process we need to understand the Jewish role in it — because it is the key role.”

[Article].

For the audio version of this article, go [Here] and scroll down to 09-18-1999.

About Tom Wolfe’s 1975 book. I own this book and I think everyone should read it, even if Wolfe’s sometimes-”cute” writing style (in this particular book, at least) doesn’t completely suit them. In the book, Wolfe attacks modern art for what it is: over-hyped, cultish baloney:

[Article].

(Click on photo to enlarge it)

Arundel Castle, West Sussex, England. Only Whites are capable of building things like this, and the muds know it, which is why they hate us (and fear us):

[Photo].

[Photo].

[Photo].

More about Arundel Castle [Here].

Post whatever you want…

This is a topic that is somewhat important historically, but, good information about it is rather scarce. Names and bios of high-ranking Jews in Freemasonry are not widely available. Further, this topic is too “shadowy” and “tinfoil-hat” for many people to tolerate.

It is known that Jews were disproportionately involved in Freemasonry [1], and, that Freemasonry benefited Jews in several ways (e. g., it allowed them to network socially with powerful gentiles, and it spread egalitarian ideas through upper-crust gentile society).

Many of the people involved in the French Revolution were Freemasons.

Considering all of the famous and powerful people who were Freemasons, I sense that there is a lot of potential “gold” to be found in this topic if it could be properly “mined” by a skilled White Nationalist researcher, i.e., I mean the creation of a big book, written purely from a WN perspective, complete with photos and charts (or does one already exist – one not written by a UFO/Bigfoot researcher or a Christian kook?).

[Article].

[1] for example, circa 1815, the Frankfurt lodge was heavily Jewish. Another lodge, in Pennsylvania circa 1781, was almost entirely Jewish. A rich, well-known Jewish Freemason, Moses Michael Hays, appointed many Jews to top positions within American Freemasonry.

(Possible) further reading on this subject: “Jews and Freemasons in Europe 1723-1939,” by Jacob Katz; “Freemasonry as a Source of Jewish Civic Rights in Late Eighteenth-Century Vienna and Philadelphia: A Study in Atlantic History” by R. Williams Weisberger

“Peace between Moslem and Christian was a century-old fact until ended by the acts of the Truman administration on behalf of ‘Israel.’”

– from the book “The Iron Curtain Over America” (Boring, OR.; CPA Books, 1951/1995) by former military intelligence officer John Beaty, p. 211

The Movement was last seen in 1979, riding in a car with a couple of “conservative” Jews. Relatives of the Movement suspect “something fishy” has happened, but of course they’re not sure exactly what. If you’ve seen the Conservative Movement, call…somebody:

[Article].

[Article].

The Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail (1973):

(a .pdf file): [Book].

More about the book [Here].

The antidote is the poison! The cure is the disease! The ugliest form of hate in world history is Judaism, and its off-shoot, Marxism. Yet, we gentiles are told that the response to Judaism/Marxism (i.e., Nazism) is the worst hate:

[Article].

by Dr. William Pierce.

[...]

“And that is their aim because they are Jews, and they are reaching for even more control than they already have. This is the historic modus operandi of the Jews. They are outsiders everywhere except in Israel, and when they first appear in any Gentile society and begin reaching for power they are resisted. The society treats the Jews as outsiders, as aliens, and attempts to keep them from gaining control. The Jewish method of countering this opposition is to work quietly to accumulate as much wealth as possible. At the same time they work to corrupt the society’s leaders with money and to sow dissension among the masses, to set one social class against another, to break up the society’s solidarity and its cohesiveness, so that there will be less resistance to their penetration of the society.”

[Article].

For the audio version of this article, go [Here] and scroll down to 09-11-1999.

Because you’re hooman, see, you automatically have special rights that other animals don’t have, see? (Ask a Jewish expert – like René Cassin). But these hooman rights will vary greatly, depending on various factors, e.g., whether you are White, non-White, female, poor, a leftist, a homosexual, etc. If you’re a conservative, White male, you have no hooman rights:

[Article].

Stupid ghetto “language” be legits, dawg!

[Article].

You’ve always wondered why negroes have weird names like “Shawntrell” or “Quintonius” instead of normal names like “Bill” or “Steve.” Well, now you know: it’s all your fault, Whitey!

[Article].

Maybe they should focus on a bigger outrage than some Libyan being sprung from jail too early. Maybe they should focus on why the Lockerbie bombing happened in the first place (i.e., because of Israel):

[Article].

Having suffered for years under the heel of Jewish communism, Romanians know the score about the yids [1]:

[Article].

[1] about the Jewing of Romania: see post #217 (scroll down if your browser doesn’t go directly to it)

I had a high-school football coach who used to say, “learn, and never forget, the fundamentals of the game.” That was good advice. Well, I disagree with Kurtagic here at the fundamental level. One of the reasons why White men are in trouble today is that they have forgotten a simple but very important fact: they built the West and only they can manage it properly. Western culture is “White male.” Why would White men want more women in the work force? If anything, they should want far less women in the work force. Will we feminize the WN movement before it ever has a chance of succeeding? What would Dr. Pierce think?

[Article].

The Stepford Wives (1975, starring Katharine Ross and Paula Prentiss; based on the book by Ira Levin).

If this movie was meant to portray gentile men as evil anti-progressives who want obedient wives who exist only to cook and clean, I think it back-fired. I think most men would want a Stepford wife – in fact, up until about 1960, most women were Stepford wives.

Anyway, I found this movie interesting and somewhat entertaining.

by Dr. William Pierce.

“What all of this amounts to is a disgusting caricature of civilized government. It’s a preview of democracy in the 21st century, as the Jews would like it to be: at the top a Jewish elite of string-pullers and media bosses and money men; at the bottom a degraded and easily manipulated electorate of sports fans and hereditary lemmings; and in between a class of thoroughly corrupt and amoral politicians and bureaucrats to front for the Jewish elite and help keep the electorate in line.”

[Article].

For the audio version of this article, go [Here] and scroll down to 09-04-1999.

Years ago, when America was still a White republic, there existed private-property rights, which protected business owners. But today, thanks to Jews like congressman Emanuel Celler, those rights are gone. Now, the federal government tells you who you can hire and fire:

[Article] and [Article].

More about the EEOC (scroll down the page about half-way) [Here].

by Farnham O’Reilly.

“There are, as of today, still a substantial amount of White people who are of pure blood; i.e. — White on the outside. But that is doing us no good, because very few of us are White on the inside. I am talking about moral purity. Our elites understand this very well, and that’s why they first concentrated on corrupting us with entertainment, pornography and sexual degeneracy (their favorites), destruction of the marriage as an institution, and radical feminism with the resultant destruction of the family unit. This all had to be done before they could proceed to making us lose our racial identity entirely.”

[Article].

Interesting comments about Hollywood:

[Interview].

More: [Here].

Interest payments, psychoanalysis, Christianity, poop jokes, anti-racism/C.O.T.O., dick-snipping – isn’t it strange how Jewish things become White things? [1] [2]:

[Article].

[1] the Old Testament is Jewish

[2] C.O.T.O. = the Championing Of The Other, a main (or perhaps the main) feature of leftist ideology

Wait a second: if striking a Jew is like striking God, then arresting a Jew is like…oh, no! God’s in jail!

[Article].

Jew #1: “American troops aren’t staying in Iraq for Zionism. No. They’re staying in Iraq for…uh…for…let’s see…”

Jew #2: “For democracy and freedom!”

Jew #1: “Yes, yes…for that!”

[Article].

by Farnham O’Reilly.

[...]

“More than anything else, our future is determined by how we see ourselves. So, to control the future of us as a people, it is only necessary to control how we view ourselves. It follows then that to destroy a people one only needs to get them to feel bad about themselves. There are two weapons used to accomplish this, and they work flawlessly: shame and guilt.”

[Article].

by Dr. William Pierce.

[...]

“The feminists, the homosexuals, the liberals believe that we need such laws in order to maintain domestic tranquility, that it is more important to keep people from having their feelings hurt by “offensive” speech than it is to preserve the freedom to say whatever we believe. But that’s still a minority opinion. A majority of White Americans have not yet been convinced that they ought to give up their First Amendment rights for the sake of tranquility — but that’s not for a lack of the Jews’ trying to convince them.”

[Article].

For the audio version of this article, go [Here] and scroll down to 08-28-1999.

The famed poet Byron (1788-1824) had a flair for words, you have to admit, even if you aren’t a fan of poetry:

[Website].

Instead of the usual Blacks-attacking-Whites, it looks like the opposite may be happening up north:

[Article].

by Max Hadden.

“In the past, I’ve explained why the Jews are the enemy, some of the tools they are using to destroy us, the names of many responsible, and their primary mental weapon: demoralization (see “These Are Not The Jews You’re Looking For”). The Jews and their brainwashed followers in the mass media of news and entertainment and in our educational institutions criticize White people relentlessly demoralizing generations of White children and making them harmless servants and obedient victims. The false ideology of Marxism is pervasive and damaging, but the problem is far worse than “conservatives” admit when they claim the problem is “liberalism”. When a race cannot reproduce themselves they are dying and will become extinct. The following thoughts might sound repetitive, but it is imperative that we understand how the Jews are exterminating the White race.”

[VNN Forum].

Heard: a news reporter talking about how an American man “served his country” fighting in Vietnam. His country? Huh. Not only are wars good for Jews financially (the government must borrow money, with interest on the loans, to fight the wars) but also, wars divert the attention of the goyim so that they focus on the wars and not on which greasy tribe is wrecking their country. (Media-driven crises such as “global warming” do the same thing). Wars are also dysgenic for Whites. By the way, have you ever heard of Walt Rostow? Further, the fact that Jews played a big role in the anti-Vietnam War movement changes nothing. Jews are not only born dissenters, but were usually pro-communist in the 1960s, before the neocon revolution.

[Article].

Re: Bolshevik crimes, see comments #1, #2 and #3 [Here].

But worry not. All you have to do is keep voting for conservatives, and America will return to being a White republic real soon…right? No? Oh, you’re such a pessimist…

[Article].

Another federal judge voids another state law. Why do states even exist? Why doesn’t the federal government just dissolve all of the states and then rename America? Here’s a possible name: “People’s Democratic Republic of Boasheimer” (after Franz Boas and Max Horkheimer):

[Article].

(Click image to enlarge)

by Arch Stanton.

Last night I had an epiphany. It came after watching a movie titled “Russian Ark.” This 2002 Russian film is aptly titled as it encapsulates and preserves Russian culture as it was before the jewish/Bolshevik revolution of 1917. A lavish production filmed inside the state Hermitage in St. Petersburg , the film is a dream-walk through what Russia was before Tsar Nicholas was murdered and Russia was destroyed. The Empress Elizabeth Petrovna commissioned construction of the winter palace in 1754. Catherine The Great then built the adjoining, small Hermitage in 1764 to house her art collection. The “great hermitage” was built in 1771 and eventually declared a state museum by the communist overlords. The movie takes the viewer back through history using the character of an 19th-century French diplomat as a guide. It provides a fascinating look at various historical periods from Catharine The Great to Tsar Nicolas. The film employs an astonishing number of actors. The sheer panorama makes it difficult at points to think one is not actually looking through a window of time.

As the movie progresses, the lavishness increases until the end where the viewer finds snapshots of the spectacular parties and political functions of Russian court. Unlike an American movie that would undoubtedly portray such lavishness as a sickening feature of the white race thankfully lost, the Russians embrace their heritage. They portray their ancestors in a more loving light by the fact that they are not critical of, nor do they assign any blame for, their actions. These “slice of life” vignettes have literally hundreds of fully costumed historical figures in attendance. The splendor of the Russian court is visually astounding to the point where one actually feels humbled watching it. The last shot in the movie features panoramic views of the characters walking though the Hermitage. The men are dressed in a complex array of military and diplomatic service uniforms, while the women are delicate and beautiful in their display of elaborate gowns from the various eras. It is a breathtakingly beautiful display of white culture at what was probably its zenith.

When the screen finally went black, I suddenly felt that everything was tightly connected. It was as if I could see the whole of history in one long chain of events, stretching all the way back to the Bible. I felt like I could see everything that has happened and everything that is going to happen. It was like a perfect pattern laid out in front of me and I realized we were all a part of it and all trapped by it. I could see everything western culture had lost; not just the pomp and circumstance of its royal courts, but its very soul. My first thought was, “the jews really have destroyed it all; everything precious to western culture has been debased to its rudest elements or destroyed outright. The fat lady really has sung.” My second thought was that the first reaction most Americans would exhibit towards this film is a disgusting, egalitarian counterpoint to the Russian nobility: they would imagine the horrible conditions of squalor and misery suffered by the Russian peasantry. White western man is so imbued with guilt that he can no longer view beauty in its own right. He must always contrast the beauty of western civilization with the few ugly parts of it.

The classic perception of the screw-the-little-guy, “let them eat cake” syndrome (a statement never actually made by the lovely Marie) is typically ascribed by moderns to the nobility of previous eras. Yet, how many Americans have any knowledge of the actual social conditions of the peasant classes or their feelings towards the nobility? How many will ever think to contrast the typically-perceived horrific conditions endured by these peasants with their eventual slaughter by the jewish commissars who “liberated” Russia from its monarchal “oppressors”? How many know why Peter and Catherine of Russia were assigned the title of “great” by the very peasant classes they supposedly oppressed? Did anyone ever spontaneously assign the title of “great” to a communist politburo member? How many descriptions of these times have been squeezed and filtered though the lens of the jewish propagandist?

This movie provided an intense impression of a white woman’s culture now destroyed; a culture that strove to achieve high standards of beauty and excellence. Perhaps misguided at times, these standards were nonetheless essentially native to a culture that once valued poise, a demure nature, porcelain white skin and carefully coiffed hair. These were the women young girls dreamed of emulating; women who set social standards worth striving for.

The lack of body-piercing or tattoos in the movie was, of course, glaringly obvious. I couldn’t begin to imagine where an American director might find the same number of unmarked and unsullied women for such a film (i. e., women who have yet to embrace the jewish message “revel in your status as a worthless shiksa whore; after all, you’re no longer a lady, you’re a half-dead goth slut! Hate yourself! Hate your race! Show your hate by defacing your natural beauty! Tattoo and pierce your perfect skin! Roll like a dog in the filth of your debased status! Mate with the lowest form of life that can walk upright, spread your legs for it twice a day!”)

It took countless millennia for white civilization to climb out of the slime pits of animal savagery. Yet it took only the briefest moment for it to return to the abyss. When I look around America, I am sickened at the thought of how it is almost impossible to find white women without tattoos or body-piercings mutilating their perfect beauty. Even the very young have rings through their noses like the sluts they are to become. The other day I happened to pass an exquisitely beautiful white girl. She, not more than 14, was pandering to the blackest savage, who looked freshly arrived from an African jungle. The young girl, bright and alert, was dialing her cell phone while the savage looked on, dull and stupefied – not so much with disinterest as with a total lack of concentration or cognitive thought. My mind flashed on what this girl might look like after birthing a brood of half-breed savages who would forever remain with one foot mired in the African jungle. As dimwitted subhumans pop out one after another from her birth canal, this beautiful white girl will be transformed into an ugly skank, working the streets to support her savage stud’s crack habit. I had to leave quickly to distance the thought from my mind.

Where is the public disgust at young girls mutilating their bodies with piercings and tattoos and becoming sluts at 14? Where is the moral outrage concerning these same white children being turned over to Negro savages? (Contrast the latter to a really big public outrage, pedophilia: what are the real numbers of pedophilic predations compared to the Negro’s predations upon young white females? Which do you think poses the greater threat to American society, pedophiles or Negro role models openly presented to white teenagers as the finest mating material?).

After comparing old St. Petersburg to the modern West, one is hit with the realization that it may take hundreds of years for the white race to emerge from the slime pits of the jew’s cultural latrine. Only obscure images on film will recall the white man’s former glory, a glory that might have been the foundation of an even greater civilization had it not been infiltrated by the vile jew.