21 March, 2006

E.O. Wilson Discusses the Evolution of Darwin

Posted by alex in Alex Linder, Christianity at 3:52 am | Permanent Link

Darwin evolved from a Christian into a man, and for that the silt slurpers will never forgive him. How you gonna keep ’em gawking at the fag in the funny hat after they seen books?

Those with faith in God have no faith in evidence, thus they are easily duped. The Catholic apologists want it both ways. They want to claim the church, by which they mean their sect, is responsible for science, while ignoring that their entire religion being based on the Big Lie that a man came back from the dead. Physical laws: now they exist, now they’re waived. You doubt? “Go pray.” The church has been charged with encouraging passivity and stupidity. The charge is sustained. All the prayer in the history of the world ain’t worth one bent finger.

Orwell observed it is extremely difficult to focus on things right in front of your nose – and religion does its screwy best to remove what little concentration men are capable of. Confusing cause and effect plays into the preacher’s plate. If there’s anything rarer than a attractive nun it’s a priest who believes in God. Priests use ‘God.’ Hell, if He didn’t exist, they’d have had to invent Him.

Article.


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 09/09/12 On the Moral Code: An Exchange among Lasha Darkmoon, E. Michael Jones, and Kevin MacDonald 24% similar
  3. 05/23/07 New Book, re: Jesus and the Talmud 21% similar
  4. 03/11/06 General Decline/Detroit 17% similar
  5. 01/16/10 Race and Religion: Awkward Friends of the White Man, Part II 17% similar
  6. 05/13/07 E. Michael Jones Book Review: Salvation and the Jews 16% similar
  7. 22 Responses to “E.O. Wilson Discusses the Evolution of Darwin”

    1. Me Says:

      Go away

    2. Antagonistes Says:

      Okay. There is no God and the universe, going it blind, produced a creature (man) who can, as it were, stand outside the universe and turn his intelligence and insight upon this same universe to find meaning, or lack of meaning. God, or lack of God. Design, or lack of design.

      And when a man dies, it does not even matter, because he is inanimate dirt instead of animate dirt. And when the sun expands to incinerate the earth in the far future, it does not even matter, because the Aryan race will be incinerated. Nothing will matter, not even the realization that nothing matters.

      There is a heirarchy to religion. The religion for the masses is put in the most simple terms for them. This religion for the masses produces straw men which are easy to knock down. I, myself, have fun knocking them down.

      There is a higher country in religion to which few people venture. It takes effort and it is intertwined with art and philosophy. Most people would
      rather say “the sinner’s prayer” and think that they are “going to heaven” and then forget about it and go about their business of making money, which they call “serving others.”

      There is a higher conception of religion and few there be that find it. But didn’t someone else already say that?

    3. Trypho Says:

      VNN is veering toward mediocre materialistic liberalism, and becoming an ally of materialistic Jews. It is just as idiotic to be a nihilistic secularist as it is to be a moronic fundamentalist. The false theses of Mencken and Darwin are dissolvents, as Judaism is essentially nihilistic and this-wordly, any telluric, reductionistic, and materialistic movements will only increase the power of Judaism. Obviously everyone needs to study Schopenhauer on this matter, for inferior, uprooted pseudo-Aryans have forgotten the meaning of their own traditions and play so easily into the hands of nihilistic Jews–religion is merely mythologized allegories for the collectivity who wouldn’t understand esoteric truths otherwise… The Christian religion is of Aryan Indo-Iranian origin with its emphasis on mystical self-conquest, and only later has it been corrupted by Jewish distorters… Reductionistic, liberalistic rationalism cannot provide the foundation of any significant historical movement. Study the following by Schopenhauer:

      http://www.gutenberg.org/files/10833/10833-h/10833-h.htm

      http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/religion/chapter6.html

      “The fundamental characteristics of the Jewish religion are realism and optimism, views of the world which are closely allied; they form, in fact, the conditions of theism. For theism looks upon the material world as absolutely real, and regards life as a pleasant gift bestowed upon us.

      …The New Testament, on the other hand, must be in some way traceable to an Indian source: its ethical system, its ascetic view of morality, its pessimism, and its Avatar, are all thoroughly Indian. It is its morality which places it in a position of such emphatic and essential antagonism to the Old Testament, so that the story of the Fall is the only possible point of connection between the two. For when the Indian doctrine was imported into the land of promise, two very different things had to be combined: on the one hand the consciousness of the corruption and misery of the world, its need of deliverance and salvation through an Avatar, together with a morality based on self-denial and repentance; on the other hand the Jewish doctrine of Monotheism, with its corollary that “all things are very goodâ€? [Greek: panta kala lian]. And the task succeeded as far as it could, as far, that is, as it was possible to combine two such heterogeneous and antagonistic creeds.

      As ivy clings for the support and stay it wants to a rough-hewn post, everywhere conforming to its irregularities and showing their outline, but at the same time covering them with life and grace, and changing the former aspect into one that is pleasing to the eye; so the Christian faith, sprung from the wisdom of India, overspreads the old trunk of rude Judaism, a tree of alien growth; the original form must in part remain, but it suffers a complete change and becomes full of life and truth, so that it appears to be the same tree, but is really another.

      Judaism had presented the Creator as separated from the world, which he produced out of nothing. Christianity identifies this Creator with the Saviour, and through him, with humanity: he stands as their representative; they are redeemed in him, just as they fell in Adam, and have lain ever since in the bonds of iniquity, corruption, suffering and death. Such is the view taken by Christianity in common with Buddhism; the world can no longer be looked at in the light of Jewish optimism, which found “all things very goodâ€?: nay, in the Christian scheme, the devil is named as its Prince or Ruler ([Greek: ho archon tou kosmoutoutou.] John 12, 33). The world is no longer an end, but a means: and the realm of everlasting joy lies beyond it and the grave. Resignation in this world and direction of all our hopes to a better, form the spirit of Christianity. The way to this end is opened by the Atonement, that is the Redemption from this world and its ways. … Everything which is true in Christianity may also be found in Brahmanism and Buddhism. But in Hinduism and Buddhism you will look in vain for any parallel to the Jewish doctrines of “a nothing quickened into life,â€? or of “a world made in time,â€? which cannot be humble enough in its thanks and praises to Jehovah for an ephemeral existence full of misery, anguish and need.”

      http://www.archangelpublishing.com/page4.html

      Jesus Christ was an Aryan spiritual warrior who set himself against the dark heterodox spirits of the fallen age and their earthly minions (cf. Aryan Indo-Iranian imagery of embattled Messiah Sraosha and his many warrior saints seated for battle atop their white mounts: Revelation 19-20, “The heavens were opened, and as I looked on, a white horse appeared; its rider was called ‘The Faithful and True.’ Justice is his standard in passing judgment and waging war. His eyes blazed like fire, and on his head were many diadems … The armies of heaven were behind him riding white horses and dressed in fine linen, pure and white”). Christ was also “after the order of Melchizedek” (Hebrews 5, 7), thus he was head of an ancient Aryan Solar Priesthood once located in Indo-Hittite Jerusalem predating profane Abrahamic religion by ages. Jesus also denied the Jewish-Davidic concept of the Messiah, “If David himself addresses [the Messiah] as ‘Lord’, in what sense can he be his son?” [Mark 12: 35-37]. As to Christ’s Aryan, solar appearance {Helios Christus}, see Matthew 17: 2-5, “his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light”. The words Jehovah and Adonai are conspicuously absent in the New Testament, replaced by the Aramaic word ‘Father’, Abba. The Welsh Bard Taliesin (of the 500’s AD) stated that there was never a time when the Druids did not hold to the teachings of the Christian Church.

      “An extant 700 AD German rendition of Christ is clearly ‘heathen’ in form. The artisan has him looking every bit like a vanquishing Aryan warrior, menacingly brandishing his axe, sword and spear against his father’s enemies. This is probably very similar to the Magian view of Sraosha, the tall and quick, fiend-smiting Saviour, the great conqueror, whose axe cleaves asunder the skulls of the Daevas (a class of divinities known to the Hindus and certain European pagans), when he engages them in battle. Sraosha’s battle-lust against the forces of evil would come to the fore in the apocalyptic conflict which would ensnare the great serpent and the demon Ahriman forever”.

      8th Century AD Old English runic inscription, The Dream of Rood: “Then the young Warrior, God, the All-Wielder…mounted the cross to redeem mankind. I held the High King, the Lord of heaven…with black nails driven…Black darkness covered with clouds God’s body, That radiant splendor”.

      The Saxon Heliand also illuminates the Aryan-Magian philosophical basis of Christianity and its significance as extension of the Old Ways.

      http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/v04p335_Whisker.html

      To Marcion, the Old Testament was lie because it was the story of a false god, a deceiver: Jehovah. It and most, if not all, of its various characters were a deceit, and must be rejected. The Jews he considered to be the people of Jehovah, that is, a race dedicated to the false god. He agreed with the Jews on one point: their messiah had not yet come. Jesus Christ was not their redeemer; he had come to liberate men from the false religion of Jehovah. In his anti-cosmic dualism, Marcion put the unknown God in opposition to the inferior creator-god, Jehovah. The salvation of mankind meant, in a word, liberation from Jehovah.
      ….

      To Rosenberg, Paul was the grand conspirator. Seeing that the new religion of Christ could not be defeated, that it threatened Judaism, the Jews sent Paul to transform it. Because the New Testament blamed the Jews for the death of Christ (“His blood be upon us …”) it would or at least could take on an anti-Jewish character. So the Jews decided, according to Rosenberg, to send one of their own, in effect sacrificing him, to redirect Christianity. It was this simple: Christ had come unto his own, and his own received him not. The Jews were thus outcast. But by redirecting Christianity, Paul made it seem that the Jews were not outcasts.

      Had it not been for Paul, Rosenberg argued, Christianity would have been as the “heretics” like the Bogomili, Manichaeans, Paulicans, or Cathars. It would have rejected the Old Testament, removed the Jews and their Jehovah, and founded an anti-Jewish religion.

    4. apollonian Says:

      Confronting Self And Issue: Is It Talmud Or Not? If Not, What?
      (Apollonian, 21 Mar 06)

      Religion, esp. Christianity, is aesthetic understanding which is practiced–but which properly begins in the literature. First, one must appreciate literature, and this requires HONESTY. Notice how Linder/VNN wants to prejudice the subject, Christianity?

      Hence we speak the people’s language, this Christianity, and we make use of rhetoric to accomplish necessary purpose, white liberation.

      How can Linder/VNN be white, and for white people, if he so much insists on prejudicing the subject?–not to mention the anti-Christ theme itself? Does Linder/VNN oppose Talmud or not? Does Linder/VNN oppose Christianity more or less than Talmud? These are questions all must answer for mere self and honesty. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

    5. Adversaryan Says:

      apollonian is just a blow hard, who blows jebus.

    6. alex Says:

      Christianity is an aesthetic reaction to the conditions in which we find ourselves. That could be nice, at least in part, but it tends to turn into sheer fantasy, and so becloud actual, existing reality which, as Wilson correctly points out, is more interesting than tall tales to amuse the finger-tracin’ Baptist.

    7. apollonian Says:

      Yes puke-head, but just think if there’s any honest patriot who actually reads these blogs–they they know who’s the “blow-hard,” don’t they “Adversaryan”? U suck. A.

    8. apollonian Says:

      Christianity is aesthetic, mentality, and lingo, which only requires then artistic mastery–I well provide this theoretic-theologic guidance as at NewNation.org under “commentary.” All we real Christian patriots need in non-censorship. Thanks much. A.

    9. Jim Says:

      “Adversaryan�? U suck. A.

      Not very Christian of you. WWJS?

    10. Will Says:

      “Okay. There is no God and the universe, going it blind, produced a creature (man) who can, as it were, stand outside the universe and turn his intelligence and insight upon this same universe to find meaning, or lack of meaning. God, or lack of God. Design, or lack of design.”

      Earth is not the “Universe”. Think of it as sort of a microcosm of the “Universe’s” mystical purpose: life.

      Earth has at its surface a 75% coverage in DEEP SALTY OCEANS OF WATER. You know, WATER, that stuff you won’t survive a day without.

      That stuff that comprises roughly 80% of your mortal body. Di-Hydrogen Monoxide. H20.

      Earth. Oceans. Several hundred million years. Dinosaurs. Ants, cockroaches, beetles, mosquitos. God. Whatever you want to call it.

      How can you God-pushers go around spouting off about your creator without ever even DEFINING the very thing you’re talking about.

      So? Define “God”. Mine is Earth, Water, Hundreds of millions of years. What’s yours?

    11. alex Says:

      “For theism looks upon the material world as absolutely real, and regards life as a pleasant gift bestowed upon us.”

      That’s the way to look at it, whether the jews see it that way or not.

      It is wrong to take Christianity as a myth, because it presents itself as the truth. This is not a point you can escape by spinning words.

      When something presents itself seriously, it requires a serious response.

      The intelligent man responds to Christianity’s central claim by observing that it is a lie.

      Aryans didn’t create Christianity and don’t need it.

      Everything we need is in our genes.

    12. tom Says:

      there are only 3 possibilities about christ no matter how you look at it: either he was an imposter (that is a deceiver) or he was mad or he really was the son of god as he said. there are no other possibilities. even the most rabid anti-christian jew doesn’t claim christ was mad or never existed. christ proved by his miracles he was god. the laws of physics can be broken by their designer.
      the last 4 things: death, judgement, heaven or hell…….for all eternity. hell is a real place and millions go there. refusing to believe in it won’t stop you from ending up there: “….he who does not believe will be condemned”.

    13. alex Says:

      “The fundamental characteristics of the Jewish religion are realism and optimism, views of the world which are closely allied; they form, in fact, the conditions of theism. For theism looks upon the material world as absolutely real, and regards life as a pleasant gift bestowed upon us.

      This way of looking at the world is far superior to christian mysticism, as history proves. The jews are on top, the christians are sucking their thumb and going backwards. The last thing Whites need is concern about some other world, they need to worry about the game today.

      Whites want to win. Look at the winners and see how they do it.

      How do the jews gain power over us? On the religious front, by eschewing universalism and tomorrowism for tribalism and todayism.

    14. alex Says:

      tom – where do people who steal from C.S. Lewis without citing him go?

    15. alex Says:

      “Resignation in this world and direction of all our hopes to a better, form the spirit of Christianity.”

      Christianity can never be the source of racial revival for a number of reasons, not least its inherent faggot passivity.

      Active, hopeful, optimistic, realistic – these are the attriutes of winners real and potential.

      Christianity is a built-in excuse, and that’s why the rabble love it.

    16. apollonian Says:

      Hey “Jim” at 2:56PM, why isn’t the truth consistent w. Christianity?

      Alex, u admonishing someone for plagiarism is rich–what about u pretending to say what Christianity strives to present AND NOT GIVING CITATIONS? As for the moral which Christianity presents, it is unmistakable: the OBJECTIVE REALITY as basis of truth against the Talmudic-Judaic subjective. For more expo, see Apollonian essays on NewNation.org, under “commentary” heading.

      So Christianity presents itself as powerful myth for a certain mentality accessible to the great masses?–what’s wrong with that as long as it does the job opposing Talmudism-Judaism?

      The only task now is literary analysis: Alex Linder’s/VNN’s is old, cliche’d, Linder pretending to defending of truth, utterly misjudging Christianity with gross prejudiced criteria.

      Unquestionably, Christianity presents a mentality we patriots can well work with, esp. as we understand the Hegelian historical dialectic, Christianity the antithesis to the Jew. Honest elections and death to the Fed. A.

    17. Merovius Says:

      Well christinsanity is a big problem but so are its secular branches, but the secular egalitarian is on average easier to turn around. Where the christling is so suck on jewish pie in the sky lies, they are beyond hope.

    18. Merovius Says:

      Since some are stuck on the bible for their Racialism, and understanding it is wrote by jews based off stolen Aryan religious myths. Why not turn to Satan instead after all he spends the whole time in the bible fighting the jews, and there jew god. The bible even says Satan is ruler of earth, hence the governer of Natural Order. Where jeboo bends over altar boys in his women free paradise. After all jeboo says for a man to have a heathly sex drive ie lust for a women is evil. Where Satan says Let the best Aryans breed strong and healthy intelligent childern with fellow Aryans in Aryan lands.

    19. apollonian Says:

      Proper Metaphysical Dichotomy: Satanism Not The Point

      Hey “Merovius” tell me: are u really a Jew pretending to being a stupid Aryan? When u speak to me about “jeboo” pls cite book, chapter, verse, then u see, we can pretend to starting fm same page.

      Don’t u realize u misrepresent Christianity, in an extremely prejudiced version as u give?

      Let me explain something: New Testament (NT) is GREEK LITERATURE in same brilliant tradition as Homer’s Illiad and Oddyssey.

      Every complaint u make about Christianity is unfair; what I want to hear fm u is expo on the Talmud–what do u know about the Talmud?

      I feature appreciation of NT in same manner as I’d try to analyze Homer’s Illiad and Oddyssey–literarily.

      Merovius, I gotta say ur rendition of Christian aesthetic is highly affected and prejudiced, biased and actually inaccurate as it is unfair. U must take one of two choices, there is no other: NT OR TALMUD, EITHER-OR, subjective or objective–that’s how I see the analysis. And u seem to be one who merely wants to make excuses for subjectivity.

      Let’s just take and analyze ur very last sentence about “Aryan breeding….” And that is, it’s what (I say about ur vision) happens anyway, regardless of “Satan,” though I do take ur point. Again, u’re mistaken and unfair regarding Christianity, an aesthetic designed to be most appropriate for reason and the OBJECTIVE reality.

      But I thank u for ur satanist input, too puerile and non-scientific for my tastes. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

    20. Merovius Says:

      So no you can not prove your bible as anything other then fictional. Old rabbi jewsus says “salvation is of the jews.”

    21. apollonian Says:

      Merovius, poor comrade, ur answer/post, just above (10:58 AM) fails, u poor, stupid moron. What is the book, chapter, verse citation for ur idiotic quote, dumbass? Where are the answers to the other questions I pose to u, u brainless imitation of a Jew. Stupid puke like u, Merovius, is what turns off more fellow white volk against (good Christian) racism and racists, but that’s life I guess. Good (Christian) racists are made even after learning about stupid, brainless shits like u.

      What are u against MORE, SHIT-FOR-BRAINS?–THE TALMUD OR NEW TESTAMENT? Apollonian

    22. Sulla Says:

      “there are only 3 possibilities about christ no matter how you look at it: either he was an imposter (that is a deceiver) or he was mad or he really was the son of god as he said. there are no other possibilities.”

      This is more horseshit Christ-insanity speak. I believe the fundie Christling called Josh McCumtwat or something came up with this “argument”. Typical Christling “reasoning”. How about a 4th possibility/ The fucker never existed in the 1st place? Go to my link dipshit for some edmukation. Another book with sums things up in layman’s terms: “The Christ Conspiracy: the greatest stoey ever sold.” Availiable at Amazon.

      The fact is Christ-insanity started out as a conspiracy and still is one. I’ve got books upon books on how this overgrown dogshit cult got started and spread its tentacles in ancient Rome. From there it was downhill. Yet they are the ones gibbering from Rome to now about “conspiracies” from Pagans/Heathens, Mithraism, Templars, Freemasons, Bohemian Grove shit, Satanists (always waiting under a drawbridge for a victim didn’t you know?), Illuminati, armageddon, puke, spew, kvetch, piss & moan…

      Christ-insanity is one of many illnesses infecting the whiteman!

      even the most rabid anti-christian jew doesn’t claim christ was mad or never existed.

      You’re an idiot. There’s plenty and i mean PLENTY that do. Kessinger publishing puts out tons of books about the prigin of Jebus Christling.

      christ proved by his miracles he was god.

      Proof? Only a Christling would use the Jew Testament as “proof”. Where is there any other “proof”?

      the laws of physics can be broken by their designer.
      the last 4 things: death, judgement, heaven or hell…….for all eternity. hell is a real place and millions go there. refusing to believe in it won’t stop you from ending up there: “….he who does not believe will be condemned�.

      See you in hell Christling!