If You’re White, You’re Racist, Says Race Traitor Magazine
Posted by alex in academia, loxism, Whiteness Studies at 3:24 am | 
Permanent Link
And racism, of course, is to be stamped out.
This is a plain call for genocide issuing from jews like Ignatiev.
The following is an essay printed at racetraitor.org.
Editors’ note: While we did not write the following essay, we agree with the writer’s point of view.
The White Anti-Racist Is an Oxymoron: An Open Letter to “White Anti-Racists”
By Tamara K. Nopper
I received an annoying e-mail about white people and their struggle to do anti-racist work. I keep reading and hearing white people talk about their struggle to do anti-racist organizing, and frankly it gets on my nerves. So I am writing this open letter to white people who engage in any activist work that involves or affects non-whites. Given that the US social structure is founded on white supremacy, and that there is a global order in which white supremacy and European domination are at large, I would challenge any white person to figure out what movement or action they can get involved in that will not involve or affect non-white people.
That said, I want to begin with what has become a realization for me through the help of different politically conscious friends. There is NO SUCH THING AS A WHITE ANTI-RACIST. The term itself, “white anti- racist” is an oxymoron. In the following, I will explain why. Then, I will begin to detail how this impacts non-white people in organizing work specifically, along with how it affects non-white people generally.
First, one must realize that whiteness is a structure of domination. As such, there is nothing redeemable or reformable about whiteness. Intellectuals, scholars and activists, especially those who are non- white, have drawn our attention to this for years. For example, people such as Malcolm X, W.E.B. DuBois, Marcus Garvey, James Baldwin, Toni Morrison, Ida B. Wells, Sojourner Truth, Frederick Douglass, and many, many others who are perhaps less famous, have articulated the relationship between whiteness and domination.
Further, people such as Douglass and DuBois began to outline how whiteness is a social and political construct that emphasizes the domination, authority, and perceived humanity of those who are racialized as white. They, along with many other non-white writers and orators, have pointed to the fact that it was the bodies who were able to be racialized as “white” that were able to be viewed as rational, authoritative, and deserving. Further, and believe me, this is no small thing, white people are viewed as human. What this means is that when white people suffer, as some who are poor/female/queer, they nevertheless are able to have some measure of sympathy for their plight simply because they are white and their marginalization is considered an emergency, crisis or an issue to be concerned about.
Furthermore, even when white people have been oppressed by various dimensions of classism, homophobia and heterosexism, they have been able to opt for what DuBois, in his monograph “Black Reconstruction” brilliantly called “the psychological wage of whiteness.” That is, whites that are marginalized could find comfort, even if psychological, in the fact that they were not non-white. They could revel in the fact that they could be taken as white in opposition to non-white groups. The desire for this wage of whiteness was also what drove many white people, albeit marginalized, to engage in organized violence against non-whites.
Of course, legal cases such as the Dred Scott Decision along with many different naturalization cases involving Asian individuals, has helped to encode a state-sanctioned definition of whiteness. But there are other ways in which white people can be racialized as white by the state. They are not stopped while driving as much as non-white people. Their homes and businesses are not raided and searched as much by police officers, INS or License and Inspections (L&I). White people’s bodies are not tracked and locked up in prisons, detention centers, juvenile systems, detention halls in classrooms, “special education” classes, etc. White people’s bodies are not generally the site of fear, repulsion, violent desire, or hatred.
Now some might point out to me that white people are followed, tracked and harassed by individuals and state agents such as the police. This is true. Some white women get sexually harassed and experience state-sanctioned discrimination. Queer whites are the subject of homophobia, whether by individuals or by the state through laws and the police. Some queer whites are harassed by cops. Activist whites are stopped by police. White people who play rap music and wear gear are stopped by cops. Poor whites can be criminalized, especially by the state around welfare issues. What I want to point out is that, while I do not condone police violence and harassment, there is a way in which white people will not be viewed as inherently criminal or suspect unless they are perceived as doing something that breaks particular norms.
Conversely, other racial groups, particularly Blacks and Native Americans, are considered inherently criminal no matter what they do, what their sexual identity is or what they wear. Further, it has always struck me as interesting that there are white people who will attempt to wear what signifies “Blackness,” whether it is dreadlocks (which, in my opinion, should be cut off from every white person’s head), “gear,” or Black masks at rallies. There is a sick way in which white people want to emulate that which is considered “badass” about a certain existential position of Blackness at the same time they do not want the burden of living as a non-white person. Further, it really strikes me as fucked up the way in which white people will go to rallies and taunt the police with Black masks in order to bring on police pressure. What does it mean when Blackness is strategically used by whites to bring on police violence? Now I know that somewhere there is a dreadlocked, smelly white anarchist who is reading this message and who is angry with me for not understanding the logic of the Black masks and its roots in anarchism. But I would challenge these people to consider how they are reproducing a violence towards Blackness in their attempts to taunt and challenge the police in their efforts.
Now back to my point that white anti-racism is an oxymoron. Whiteness is a social and political construct rooted in white supremacy. White supremacy is a structure and system of beliefs rooted in European and US imperialism in which certain racialized bodies (non-white) are selected for premature negation whether through cultural, physical, psychological genocide, containment or other forms of social death. White supremacy is at the heart of the US social system and civil society. In short, white supremacy is not just a series of practices or privilege, but a larger social structure and system of domination that overly-values and rewards those who are racialized as white. The rest of us are constructed as undeserving to be considered human, although there is significant variation within non-white populations of how our bodies are encoded, treated and (de)valued.
Now, for one to claim whiteness, one also is invested in white supremacy. Whiteness itself is a political term that emerged among European white ethnics in the US. These European ethnics, many of them reviled, chose to cast their lot with whiteness rather than that with those who had been determined as non-white. In short, anyone who claims to be white, even a white anti-racist, is identifying with a history of European imperialism and racism transported and further developed into the US.
However, this does not mean that white people who go around saying dumb things such as “I am not white! I am a human being!” or, “I left whiteness and joined the human race,” or my favorite, “I hate white people! They’re stupid” are not structurally white. Remember, whiteness is a structure of domination embedded in our social relations, institutions, discourses, and practices. Don’t tell me you’re not white but then when we go out in the street and the police don’t bother you or people don’t ask you if you’re a prostitute, or if people don’t follow you and touch you at will, act like that does not make a difference in our lives. Basically, you can’t talk, or merely “unlearn” whiteness, as all of these annoying trainings for white people to “unlearn” racism will have you think.
Rather, white people need to be willing to have their very social position, their very relationship of domination, their very authority, their very being…let go, perhaps even destroyed. I know this might sound scary, but that is really not my concern. I am not interested in making white people, even those so-called good-hearted anti-racist whites, comfortable about their position in struggles that shape my life in ways that it will never shape theirs. I recently finished the biography of John Brown by DuBois. The biography was less of a biography and more of an interpretation by DuBois about the now-legendary white abolitionist. Now while John Brown’s practice was problematic in many ways–he still had to be in control and he had fucked-up views that Blacks were still enslaved because they were too “servile” (a white supremacist sentiment)–what I took from Brown’s life was that he realized that moral persuasion alone would not solve racial problems. That is, whites cannot talk or just think through whiteness and structures of white supremacy. They must be committed to either picking up arms for other people (and only firing when the people tell them so), dying for other people, or just getting out of the way. In short, they must be willing to do what the people most affected and marginalized by a situation tell them to do.
Now I am sure that right now there are some white people saying that other people cannot understand what is going on, that they do not have the critical analysis to figure stuff out, or that non-white people have fucked up ideas. This is just white supremacist bullshit because it is rooted in the idea that non-white people have not interpreted their experiences and cannot run things themselves. It also assumes that there are not internal conversations within communities–which I do not think white people need to be privy to or participate in–in which people struggle out their own visions for society and how to go about achieving them. In short, this perspective by whites that non-white people cannot be in control of our own destinies is rooted in a paternally-racist approach to non-white people.
Further, it is also rooted in the idea that white people are not racist or do not benefit from racism. Rather, white people at meetings will often discuss how they feel “silenced” by non-whites, or that they are being “put in their place.” Let me make one thing clear: it is impossible for a non-white person to put a white person in her place. This is not to say that non-white people cannot have a sexist or homophobic attitude towards a white person. But to say, or even hint at that as a “WHITE” person someone is being put in their place–whoever says this just needs to shut the fuck up because that is some bull. It is impossible for whiteness to be put in one’s place, because that is a part of whiteness, the ability to take up space and feel a prerogative to do so.
Further, the idea that white people are being put into their place relies on the neo-conservative view of reverse racism that has characterized the backlash against non-whites, especially Blacks, in the post-civil rights era. So when you say these types of things you are actually helping to reproduce a neo-conservative racial rhetoric which relies on the myth of the “threatened” and “displaced” white person.
Additionally, white activism, especially white anti-racism, is predicated on an economy of gratitude. We are supposed to be grateful that a white person is willing to work with non-white people. We are supposed to be grateful that you actually want to work with us and that you give us your resources. I would like to know why you have those resources and others do not? And don’t assume that just because I have to ask you for resources that it does not hurt me, pain me even. Don’t assume that when you come into the space, that doesn’t bother me. Don’t assume that when you talk first, talk the most, and talk the most often, that this doesn’t hurt me. Don’t assume that when I see you get the attention and accolades and the book deals and the speaking engagements that this does not hurt me (because you profit off of pain). And don’t assume that when I see how grateful non-white people are to you for being there, for being a “good white” person that this doesn’t hurt me. And don’t assume that when I get chastised by non-white people because I think your presence is unnecessary that it does not hurt me. Because all of these things remind me of how powerless non-white people are (albeit differently) in relation to white people. All of these gestures that you do reminds me of how grateful I am supposed to be towards you because you actually (or supposedly) care about what is happening to me. I am a bit resentful of economies of gratitude.
Further, this structure of white supremacy known as white anti-racism also impacts the larger social world because it still makes white people the most valued people. Non-white people are forced to feel dependent and grateful to white people who will actually interact with us. We are made to feel that we are inferior, incapable, that we really do need white people. And the sad thing is, that given all of the resources that whiteness has and that white people get and control, there is an element of material truth in all of this, I am afraid. But white people need to think of how their activism reproduces the actual structure of white supremacy some–not all whites activists–profess to be about. This structure of white supremacy is not just in an activist space, it actually touches upon and impinges on the lives of non-white people who may not be activists (in your sense) or who do not interact with you in activist worlds.
But consider what your presence means in a community that you decide to set up your community garden in, or your bookstore in, or your meeting space in, or have your march in. What does it mean when you decide that you want to be “with” the oppressed and you end up displacing them? Just because you walk around with your dreadlocks, or decide that you will not wear expensive clothes does not mean that your whiteness does not displace people in the spaces you decide to put yourself in. How do you help to bring more forms of authority and control in a neighborhood, whether through increased rent and housing costs, more policing, or just the ways in which your white bodies can make people feel, as a brilliant friend of mine once asked, “squatters in somebody else’s project”?
So what does this mean for the future of white anti-racists? This might mean to first, figure out ways in which whiteness needs to die as a social structure and as an identity in which you organize your anti-racist work. What this looks like in practice may not be so clear but I will attempt to give some suggestions here. First, don’t call us, we’ll call you. If we need your resources, we will contact you. But don’t show up, flaunt your power in our faces and then get angry when we resent the fact that you have so many resources we don’t and that we are not grateful for this arrangement. And don’t get mad because you can’t make decisions in the process. Why do you need to? Secondly, stop speaking for us. We can talk for ourselves. Third, stop trying to point out internal contradictions in our communities, we know what they are, we are struggling around them, and I really do not know how white people can be helpful to non- whites to clear these up. Fourth, don’t ever say some shit to me about how you feel silenced, marginalized, discriminated against, or put in your place. Period. Finally, start thinking of what it would mean, in terms of actual structured social arrangements, for whiteness and white identity–even the white antiracist kind (because there really is no redeemable or reformed white identity)–to be destroyed.
In conclusion, I want to say to anyone who thinks that this is too academic or abstract, I write as a non-white person, meaning that from my body, my person, I experience white supremacy. I also draw my understanding of white supremacy from non-white people, many engaged in various struggles of activism, but most importantly just to speak out and stay alive. They did not get accolades from many for speaking out but instead experienced constant threats on their lives for just existing and doing the work that they did. Moreover, I want to know when a discussion of whiteness, white supremacy and domination became seen as abstract and not rooted in the everyday concrete reality that we experience?
25 March, 2006 at 4:29 am
A careful read reveals that the mind behind this poorly written and crude boofer scratch demonstrates we can say the reverse is also true – there is no such thing as a good nigger. It’s impossible. A million years of evolutionary forces have made it impossible for a good nigger to exist given their biological inheritance. No matter how well behaved at present, every nigger is just one DD40 Malt Liquor away from complete savagery. All it takes is some hate agitprop like this and a couple of shots of beer and every nigger is a flashpoint away from turning into a madhouse meat monkey.
Any nigger not in Freaka inhabits the wrong geographic location. As they point out, it is we who are the ice people. Nigger, what you are doing outside your reserve? If we’re so bad why is it we cannot flee anyplace you do not follow? Why persist in chasing your oppressor, as you call him? All you’ve got is a continent that covers half the planet, get back in boolie boofer central and turn it into an economic paradise like the one we left you running out of the box when apartheid ended.
The coons could not even keep the tractors filled with petrol and check the air on the tires after they stole the farm equipment from the Boers. Niggers you are worse than pathetic. You’re a speed bump in white history. I doubt your entire whine during the last fifty years will even warrant a footnote in the history of our Race. You just plain never amounted to anything.
25 March, 2006 at 4:37 am
Noel Ignatiev says, incorrectly but repeatedly, that the White race has no basis in biology. He denies that Whitel culture exists. He claims that Whiteness is a social club people are assigned to.
He’s either incredibly ignorant or a lying jew when he asserts that no reputable scientist believe race is based in biology. The opposite is the case.
I may have mistakenly associated jew Ignatiev with whiteness studies elsewhere, but that is wrong. He sees it as potentially dangerous, in that it lacks a principle to exclude ‘preservationists,’ as he puts it. Any legitimation of White identity is dangerous, in his eyes. Rather whites are to shuck their underserved advantages of whit skin privilege and become new abolitionists.
Much of what Ignatiev writes is hard to understand for anyone living in the Judeosphere. Let’s see…
– the Supreme Court — a conservative, no less! — just gave the thumbs up to anti-white discrimination (affirmative action) for the next 25 years
– whites are routinely spurned as white trash, eurotrash, rednecks, hillbillies in the mass media
– whites are physically attacked by coloreds to the tune of 45,000 murdered since the sixties, and 2 million raped
But the jew will go on about ‘white skin privilege.’ Reality takes a powder when the jew opens his mouth.
25 March, 2006 at 5:10 am
When I was in the Army, I bunked with four niggers at random. (Good mix for a future racist-to-be, surrounded by that many lawn jockeys in one room.)
Before the first year was out, two of the niggers had been charged with rape in completely separate incidents, both white girls. One nigger was suspected of selling some bad meth to another coal black brother that gave him brain damage. (How would they tell such a thing?)
The remaining nigger actually managed to get through the entire year without being formally charged with anything. Not to say he didn’t do something, but rather he didn’t get caught. It’s niggers like that one that make me think that cohabitation with the coal lemurs could actually work – in about a fucking million years.
I was transferred to another unit at the end of the year by request and it was such a relief to finally open my mouth after 12 months and take a breath of decent air. Many a time I used to cross the quad to check on my old coon buddies and see how they were going in there, check in on the drug dealing, ho-pimping and crack snorting industries within the U.S. military were flourishing.
I can’t say I wasn’t friends with one of the “good niggers.” He felt so sorry for me spending all my weekends on my computer he told me I needed to get some pussy and he was trying real hard to bring his cousin over on a Saturday and get her to put out for $25.00.
Mind you, these were good niggers, some of the better ones I saw in four years in the military. I just don’t know where people get these stereotypes from.
The nigger does nothing but hit us with the left hand and hold his right out for repamarations. It’s enough to drive poor whitey flat-out insane. Wait for it.
25 March, 2006 at 5:16 am
Geez, man, I thought they just dark green Marines. Another illusion down the drain.
25 March, 2006 at 6:08 am
There was an excellent article on the mentality underlying ‘anti-racism’ that appeared in an online journal called PINC (for ‘Politcally INCorrect’):
http://www.cycad.com/cgi-bin/pinc/apr2000/articles/jk_antiracism.html
Anti-racism
By Jim Kalb
“Racism is the worst of sins, the gravest of public dangers, the most repellent of spiritual disorders. Any taint of racism soils and discredits in all respects.”
Some such view is fundamental to public life today. The emphatic opposition to racism that is now obligatory gives the “race card” extraordinary potency. If you are not part of the solution then simply by living your life from day to day you are participating in “institutional racism.”
The nature of anti-racism is rarely discussed analytically, so it appears to be less a matter of doctrine than feeling and general orientation. Nonetheless, as a view that dominates public policy it has definite content. As such, it holds that there is a definite thing called “racism,” backed by power and constituted by contempt and hatred for those who differ, but for which race relations would be harmonious if indeed differences were noted at all.
Anti-racism is not at all middle-of-the-road, although resistance to it is thought extremist. Its principle is not live-and-let-live but eradication of the universal practice of ordering life by reference to feelings of extended kinship. On the colorblind reading of civil rights law that is the most conservative view now tolerated, it is illegal to treat ethnicity as relevant to social relations that matter. More advanced readings of the law, that recognize the continuing power of ethnic ties, call for government to equalize advantages by suppressing ethnicity in the case of whites and enhancing it for others. It is simply assumed that government can carry out such a program fairly and effectively and that men will accept it indefinitely.
All over the world, anti-racism is enforced by anti-discrimination laws and prohibitions on hate speech and hate crimes. Human rights treaties make anti-racism part of the law of nations, and it has forced white South Africans to give up a position that once seemed impregnable. Respectable French intellectuals would rather abandon French particularity than seem to ally themselves with Le Pen. British TV is now as multiracial as American, and there have been serious official proposals there to make private racial comments criminal.
Although now considered fundamental, anti-racism is a recent growth. Many dictionaries did not include the word “racism” before the Second World War. The 1968 convention was the first the Democratic Party held without whites-only delegations. One of the first Roman Catholics to identify racial segregation as a sin died just last year. The dimension anti-racism adds to moral life is thus novel.
It is a dimension that gives race relations a very special position. The anti-racist sees racism as pure pathology, like smallpox. It would be all gain if it and everything that might lead to it were utterly destroyed. Racism is thought to transform everything it touches. It turns insults into crimes and makes even atrocities more ghastly. The crimes of leftist regimes are thought no more comparable to Nazi outrages than a botched surgical operation to a brutal murder. It is not thought odd when The New York Times finds glory in its connection to Walter Duranty while attacking the Swiss for insufficient anti-Nazism.
Unparalleled evil though it is thought to be, racism is seen everywhere, whether there is evidence for it or not.[8] As long as some groups are collectively unequal to others, the world is racist, and the harder it is to find an explanation that can be publicly accepted, the more fundamental and pervasive racism must be. Accusations of racism always stick, at least a little, and no matter how reckless or even cynical never hurt the accuser. Even false accusations can be valuable, because they draw attention to important issues.
In current practice, anti-racism is aimed at whites. In their case, racism includes not only hatred and abuse, but any distrust of others, any special concern or preference for whites, any recognition of whites as a people. Anti-racism also imposes on whites an obligation to sacrifice their interests to those of nonwhites. If a white does something at odds with black interests or desires, for example if he fails sufficiently to favor “affirmative action,” he is racist or at best insensitive. In contrast, public statements by blacks can be revoltingly bigoted without consequence.
…
25 March, 2006 at 7:06 am
Last time I looked no black from Africa even produced the wheel. Imagine that ! No tribal group – not even the Zulus, the aristocrats of Africa – had managed to invent the wheel! Every tool, technical advance, mod con, every toy like the Hummer the big nig nog rapper tools around in, the entire world they inhabit, has come because white Euro/Americans invented them. Go visit Africa and see what happens when the white man withdraws. Zimbabwe, once a well run country with infrastructure, now a hellhole slum. South Africa going the same road. I was just there ! Go visit Africa, Tamara WhoEverYouAre. Go see where your forebears came from – whether Ghana, Nigeria or Liberia – or wherever in Africa. You’ll be in those countries for an exotic New York minute before you get your ass back in a hurry to the US of A and breathe a big sigh if relief. Thank the white man.
25 March, 2006 at 7:08 am
blah….blah…blah……more malarkey from yr typical ZOG-washed femi-slag! Naturally, the stoopid bitch never bothers to mention the benefits accruing to ALL humanity from the White Race……science, music, literature, architecture, law & order &c……and, of course, such SLAGS are basically hypocrites….they’re quite prepared to bad-mouth the white race but are also quite prepared to live in a society where the achievements of that race can still largely be enjoyed. When are we gunna see ’em taking up residence in Haiti or Zimbabwe….when’s Ignatiev goin’ to move his comfy Harvard office to Mozambique? hmmmmmmmmmm…..?!
25 March, 2006 at 10:15 am
I agree with the writer. A society is the product of a people. Of course it makes no sense to others, that’s the point of different nations having developed. As individualistic as we are we still are operating in a somewhat collective way . . . others can see this even though we can’t. Further the writer is right in pointing out how liberal whites have usurped the voice of minority people. How many whites have made fame and fortune off celebrating divircity or writing about “white america”? The hypocracy of glass tower limo riding liberals talking about “equality” doesn’t seem to occur to anyone. Further I agree with the writer in that if whites want to solve the racial conflict with minoritiies all that needs to happen is for whites to curl up and die. As white nationalsit we should be celebrating the writers veiw point.
25 March, 2006 at 10:51 am
I think it is a wonderful idea, to abolish races, but we need a test bed to make sure the process works. We’ll start with a small group who is into racial purity, who has their own religion, and who thinks they are entitled to do as they please, based on a bunch of religious malarky, as well as outright lies. It would be helpful if the aforesaid group to be dissected and atomized would be one which is close knit, and has an extrodinary amount of power and wealth relative to their population size. If you have any ideas, I am sure we can do stage one of Noel’s plan.
25 March, 2006 at 3:24 pm
AS Dr Jensen reminds us, racial differences manifest themselves in every organ of the body. Potential recipients of transplanted body organs who face death because of an inability to racially match donors would be very suprised at Ignatiev’s insistence that race does not exist.
Tens of thousands of years of evolutionary divergence in differing climes and enviornments not only prove that race exists, not only prove that race is inevitable, they prove that without racination palentology itself would have fr4ozen at the level of microbes
Yet Ignatievs mental illness have now become unassailable orthodoxy in acadamia, an acadamia virtually entirely funded by the blood and sweat of the White people whose annihilation is its ultimate aim.
We must refuse to fund these leeches feeding off creation itself, and let them dry up shrivel and blow away. The tolerance and sanction of the victim are the greatest weapon of these vile and stinking creatures!
25 March, 2006 at 4:09 pm
Tamara K. Nopper,
I think “white anti-racist”, whom she talked about, could be a Jew with European-like skin and facial feature. He or she possibly tried to figure out how to simultaneously deal with his or her Caucasian appearance and improve to attract more non-whites to his or her anti-racial organization which is concealing its real purpose. Actually, it may be an anti-Christian/anti-white organization designed to protect Jews’ belief better while undermining Christianity farther. This white-skinned Jew, disguised as a white person, just sought Tamara Nopper’s expert advice to enhance his or her skill in overcoming his whiteness to become a certified anti-racist. My unproven theory. This was why she was so irritated, as she probably did not realize that she was actually perplexed and confused. A sort of mixed-up. I think that everyone is better off by not thinking about racists and anti-racists. Only non-human animals and pets (monkeys, cats, dogs, etc) can be anti-racists. Jews are generally treated as if they are non-whites by a white community, but they look like whites too much. Very impossible to tell difference regardless of their noses.
Jews are potentially responsible in exploiting the non-whites to join their mob to target against the whites.
“White supremacy” is divided into two different sub-supremacies – Jewish supremacy and white-gentile supremacy. They are recognized to rival against each other. Or they are possibly working together to widen white supremacy bull’s-eye so it is easier to be hit into nearly oblivion by a flood of criticisms from non-whites. Such as one of many conspiracy theories, isn’t it?
Some black activists and commentators are making mistakes for their perpetual obsession on whites and dwelling on the title, “black”, without working together to study Jews in the first place. Jews are extremely dangerous to any races include whites and blacks.
Martin Luther King was foolish enough to take a part of Jews’ anti-white plot to gain his popularity. Maybe Martin King was probably not aware about the history suggesting that it was Jews who were mostly involved in importing black slaves. He ended up by getting a shot, thanking to his bad luck for running into Jews’ scheme. Jews developed reputation as the Old-World traders, from the west coast (Europe) to the east coast (China/Japan), didn’t they? Does it make sense that some Jewish traders imported black slaves into America? Maybe King would not care about this fact as he was strongly motived by the promise of money and fame. And Jews would supply him with some European-style rally organization and mainstream media. King was needed to keep Jews’ economical crimes covered-up, as it helped Jews extending the racial blames on whites. Afterwards, in the result whites and blacks were both suffered consequences by attacking against each other for a few decades after the dark side of their relationship was publicly exposed by Jews in 1950s and 1960s. Some whites, especially white men, of today still hate blacks because blacks made giant mistakes for innocuously falling in a King scam revealing to be a Jewish scam. Not blacks’ faults but it was devastated enough to some whites. Too bad that a Zionistic leader, Martin King and an anti-semitic leader, Malcolm X both died in a same decade, 1960s within a three year interval. What coincidence.
Mexicans were probably exploited by Jew-influenced Mexican elites to illegally enter U.S. where the Mexican jobs in America were already waiting for them. Very unusual for the U.S. government to give that kind of approval. It looked like it was a part of Jews’ plan to dilute the European and Christian communities. It was in effect, thanking to American whites whose obediences was to be loyal to the anti-racial and immigrating laws created by Jews. Maybe this immigration also had a beneficial asset by lowering and browning the century-old racial tension between whites and blacks. But I don’t believe that this influx of the immigration is a solution to the racial and economical problems, as it would increase the resource consumption, job dislocations, and racial competition – especially between blacks and hispanics. I think that whites and blacks could learn how to get along without any need of the growing immigration to take care of their problem.
Whites, not Hispanics, blacks, Asians, or other races, are the leading race to receive a serious threat and suppression from Jews because of whites’ history of powerful anti-semiticism which was once very widespread across Europe in the past. The reports of religion-related incidents and experiences are being carried generations to generations. The Africans, Arabians, and Asians did not stab Jews as deep as Europeans did.
Today, Jews are killing Arabians because they just want more land for themselves. This is a best piece of evidence concerning on Jews’ continuous trouble making. It is already disseminating all over Internet. Internet pictures and films tell everything. Before the advent of Internet, Americans had no slightest idea about what were Jews doing to Arabians in Israel but saw rock-throwing angry Palestinians on TV during 1980s.
If you look at a Israeli murderer carefully, you can notice his skin is showing whiteness. Even worse, sometime Jews use gentiles’ names to conceal themselves. Jews with the gentile names are more common than white gentiles with Jewish names. Jews are causing whites greater depressing and problems than blacks and their poverty. So, blacks must think twice before they assail on whites. Blacks are so blessed that they don’t have black Jews who would screw up them badly.
Killing poverty is not essential as a shortcut to happiness. It is greed and excessive desire what causes unhappiness. Use wisdom and innovation instead to alleviate low-income life. Read one of Dalai Lama’s books then people will understand better. Dalai Lama made a point that people in 3rd world were generally happier than 1st world people because lack of complexity, stress, drugs, thieves, and materialism.
It is so incomprehensive to realize that blacks are not quitting at talking and talking about whites. For what reason? Why don’t they henceforth criticize on white-skinned Jews in another country who are busy murdering non-whites? It leaves to a few and brave white men who are dare enough to attack on the 6-thousand years old Jewish establishment. Very dirty jobs they patiently and stubbornly stick with, because they want to see Jews to be apprehended to be taken to the humankind justice.
Despite that American white soldiers who are brought to kill Iraqis, the exploited blacks, Asians and hispanics are also there as subservient for Israel without their approval and knowledge. Despite that happening, non-whites still speak “white, black, Latinos, and Asians”, as they are refusing to talk about Jews exclusively. I am a white guy who are much interested to discuss about Jews than listening to any racial issue. I don’t care about blacks attacking on whites and vice versa. Only and strictly Jewish subject, nothing else. White evilness must be forgotten because some blacks, Asians, Latinos and others are also found to be evil. The white evilness is unique comparing to the non-white evilness because it receives more publicity by the Jew-controlled media. If the Jewish evilness is being exposed, it would be hidden and buried as quick as possible.
In Europe’s meaning, anti-semiticism represents anti-criminality or pro-Christianity, not idle hatred of Jews. This movement could hurt Jews’ profits. Unable to do international business with the anti-semites means earning less money. In order to make more money and proceed trading/loaning businesses, Jews may force themselves to bribe some prominent Europeans with their offer of a large sum of money, gifts, or gold. It includes to intermarrying with gentile aristocrats, as Henry Makow, a Jewish author (www.henrymakow.com), frequently mentioned. My theory without any proof.
“White” becomes a trademark identification for its famous racial color which is benefitting Jews’ business, as long as whites are painted as scapegoats. More often people talk about whites, better it is for Jews because it helps the real Jewish perpetrators to be overlooked again and again. “White” word doesn’t scare Jews as much as “Jew” word.
Too many nonwhites see “white”, sponsored by Jews, as their belittling tool whenever they need to empower themselves. This does not help them because Jews can always act as big sharks that can eat and swallow them, among the whites. If non-whites are making “white” words relating to white people, then they are talking about 400,000,000 whites or more breathing and living in the world. Not all of 400,000,000 white people or more are crazy and evil. I know that whites had to take blames for their exploring, invading, and importing activities in the New World. The activity started after a trading route was closed by the East. The closure was a reason why it pushed the European customers into attempting an alternative path by sailing in no-man’s sea. Maybe it was Jewish traders, among other white gentiles, who also conceived this long-distant journey. It was their technology from the Old-World what destroyed the New World. Asians would do the same thing if they were interested in settling America extensively. They would bring rifles, too. The Old World had more cultures, races, cultural contacts, environmental varieties, and technological devices than the New World, so there was nothing we could do to prevent the ancient Indian population from shrinking.
Many Jews also brought the black slaves into America, although a few whites did it, too. Years later, KKK was created to stop 19th century black thieves, who were working for Jews. I don’t think that KKK, Nazi, and Neo-Nazi were formed without any connection with Jewish circumstances, but they must not be developed. They made things worse for whites because they were modified into traps to tackle some angry whites, especially after a white-skinned Jew infiltrated, via bribery or any other method, to rein one of the organizations.
Conclusion: Certainly, there is a such thing as a white anti-racist. Who is he or she? He or she is a Jew who is using his or her white skin as a weapon in fighting against whites and Christians.
In nature, no one, not even a Jew, is born to be a political figure. Jewry is completely hoax. Humans are entitled to be the members of changeable and modifiable nature, but all not eligible to live on other humans’ fictitious and religious books. No animal, except humans, can write and make laws. It is nature for kids not to perceive the skins as politics. Human beings are much better off by preferring real fossils over religions laden with mind-infecting diseases.
————————————————————————-
There may be puppets of different classes and their masters:
1. Indirected 3rd class puppet: Any gentile who admires Israel but does not have a job that is a tie to Zionism.
2. Directed 2nd-class puppet: Any Jew who is brainwashed into thinking that he is a Jew when he is really not; in reality no one is a Jew in the entire history. Jewry is all hoax. This Jew does not have a career which is critical to Zionism.
3. 2nd-class puppet: U.S. president, lawyers, politicians, CEOs, and others’ prominent positions who are all gentiles.
4. 1st-class puppet: Drug lords, politicians, CEOs, lobbyists, journalists, newspaper editors, news anchormen/women (Ted Koppel, etc.), real estates tycoons, lawyers, generals, actors, actresses, rabbis, etc who are all Jews of any nation, includes U.S.
5. Puppet master(s): Jewish bankers (former Old-World traders), potential rabbis with knowledge of dark-side Kabbalah, and others whose secret identifications are not revealed.
25 March, 2006 at 10:18 pm
I couldn’t get through the third paragraph – niggerspeak is extremely difficult to take seriuously, let alone, read…. I think we should just consider the source – a nigger female – nuff said.
26 March, 2006 at 9:27 am
Basically the woman says she hates whites and they ought to go die already. She doesnt precisely say it, but that feeling comes out her work like gas vapors.
Just maybe a liberal passing by will read it and realize how much niggers hate even whites who try to help them.
Don’t worry about the coon, white girl: you’re the one in danger. Save yourself.
1 December, 2006 at 12:46 am
The article by Tamara K. Nopper is a joke, right? Is she White and somewhat ashamed, for whatever reason, of her own culture and bloodlines? Or is she non-White and attempting to look down her four-inch-wide nose at the rest of us? As for her remark that her essay ‘may be too academic or abstract’, I would say that she may as well sell her car, since the ego trip she’s on will carry her as far as she needs to go. Academic? Using a string of words she seems to have pulled out of the dictionary does not make her a coherent writer. Writing merely to see her name attached to a published article does not make her a coherent thinker. And reading her article demonstrates how easily we can all be distracted by a fast line of BS. The issue, the one issue, before us is the survival of the European White races and their cultures. This is, as Nietzsche has said, ‘Beyond Good and Evil’. Babblers on the sidelines will be left behind.