19 March, 2006

Jews Pollute Culture to Wreck Nations

Posted by alex in General Decline, jew-led smear campaigns, jewed culture, Jewish Tribal Review, media control at 1:49 pm | Permanent Link

Hitler, the Jews, and Rabbi Lapin

by Chad Powers (Jewish Tribal Review)

“You’d have to be a recent immigrant from Outer Mongolia not to know of the role that people with Jewish names play in the coarsening of our culture. Almost every American knows this. It is just that most gentiles are too polite to mention it.”
— Rabbi Daniel Lapin
, “Our Worst Enemy”, Toward Tradition, January 20, 2005

In modern “free,” Western “democracies,” one may defame the Pope, the prophet Mohammed, or even God Him/Herself, smearing and slurring anyone’s “sacred cows” (Hindus’ obviously included) with impunity, but the “Holocaust” — holy, sacred, transcendent — is beyond public reproach. Consider that in at least seven Western countries a critic can be fined and jailed for “denying” or even “trivializing” the Holocaust, that event of Jewish obsession that has usurped what was once known as World War II, a pan-human disaster from which as many as 64 million people may have died. There is an old adage to understand this phenomenon of the holocaustal pedestal in Western life: one may gauge true power in any culture by what is forbidden to be publicly spoken.

Which brings us to Rabbi Daniel Lapin.

Quite a milestone occurred on the pages of the Internet the other day. Rabbi Daniel Lapin, an Orthodox Jew, declared that Hitler was right. At least about one thing: that highly visible Jews were in the vanguard of cultural decadence in pre-Nazi Germany. In other words, Lapin dares to infer that which cannot be publicly spoken: Jewish responsibility — at least partially — for soliciting hostile German feelings that led to the Holocaust. And attendant Jewish blame.

As we all know, particularly in “free” Western democracies, no one is allowed to speak like this. Even agreeing with Hitler that the sky is blue engenders considerable political and personal risk. Hitler and the Nazis are held to be an airtight ideological package — a kind of vacuum cleaner. If one dares to suggest that not everything Hitler said about Jews was maliciously invented, that — in today’s Judeocentric dictate — brands the offender as a certifiable “Nazi” whose latent aim must be to murder Jewry.

Well, surprise. Rabbi Lapin has broken all the rules. And for a Jew to admit that Hitler’s disdain for Jews had reasoned basis in pre-Nazi German culture, as Lapin explicitly does, is truly revolutionary. He poses a small ray of light in a very dark chamber, a light that can reveal clearly and honestly the moral and rational roots of Gentile (and Jewish!) “anti-Semitism” throughout the Jewish story.

Rabbi Lapin even has the galling audacity to quote Hitler, with both sympathy and understanding:

“Was there any form of filth or profligacy, particularly in cultural life, without at least one Jew involved in it? What had to be reckoned heavily against the Jews in my eyes was when I became acquainted with their activity in the press, art, literature, and the theater….It sufficed to look at a billboard, to study the names behind the horrible trash they advertised…. Is this why the Jews are called the “chosen peopleâ€?? The fact that nine tenths of all literary filth, artistic trash, and theatrical idiocy can be set to the account of a people, constituting hardly one hundredth of all the country’s inhabitants, could simply not be talked away; it was the plain truth.”
( – Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler, Chapter II)

Lapin cites Mein Kampf (which is banned in some countries today) to illustrate the parallels between Jewish prominence in the destruction of traditional German values and to underscore similar Jewish erosion of its American counterpart today. (Lapin’s limit, however, is that he believes that secular Jewry so prominently corrosive in American and pre-Nazi German culture has wandered far astray of its allegedly noble religious roots).

Lapin interprets Hitler’s excerpted passage this way:

“It does not excuse Hitler or his Nazi thugs for us to acknowledge that this maniacal, master propagandist focused on a reality that resonated with the educated, and cultured Germans of his day. Not once in Mein Kampf did that monster charge Jews with being complicit in the killing of Christ two thousand years earlier. He knew that long-ago event, shrouded in mystery and theological profundity, would never goad enlightened people to murder. Instead, he drew attention to the obvious and inescapable; that which every German knew to be true. The sad fact is that through Jewish actors, playwrights, and producers, the Berlin stage of Weimar Germany linked Jews and deviant sexuality in all its sordid manifestations just as surely as Broadway does today. Much of the filth in American entertainment today parallels that of Germany between the wars.”

Agreeing with Hitler about anything is one of foremost taboos in Western culture. Brutal, ruthless Adolf Hitler is the completely dehumanized icon for Evil: he is an amalgamation of the Devil, Darth Vadar, Tolkien’s Dark Lord, Headless Horsemen, Zombie Death Machines, and bloodthirsty Martians from Outer Space. And within this heavy matrix, the gravity of Jewish suffering under the Nazis effectively screens inquirers from investigating the enduringly delicate “whys” of the way so much of Europe turned on the Torah’s favored tribe. The frozen monolith of Jewish Good versus Anti-Semitic Evil is held to be polar, dualistic, dialectical: the Dark Lord enacts his bloody role in history from one side and completely Innocent Jewry fulfills their martyrological destiny on the other (although this has changed with nuclear bomb-laden Israel), with no middle ground or factual shades of any sort allowed.

Rabbi Lapin was careful to delineate — as well he should — the difference between what Hitler said and what he did. As much as Jewish convention dictates otherwise, decrying Jewish behavior and herding them into ovens aren’t synonyms. Nor is there logical closure between open critique in 2005 and the peculiar contexts of World War II. The “Holocaust” occurred in the very heart of a very vicious war and, as reminder, the second world war did not center around the singular issue of Jewish survival problems in battlefield countries where anyone stood be decimated.

Rabbi Lapin is obviously a very unusual man, let alone an unusual Jew. You won’t find any other Jews (or anyone else in “respectable” public discourse) quoting Hitler to make a point these days. And, truth be told, only a Jew has the remotest chance of getting away with it.

One would imagine that Jews at-large would be eager to understand the social, political, and psychological currents that gave rise to violent political action against them. You’d think they would want to remedy the problem of anti-Jewish hostility, once and for all. Once truly understood, one might logically presume that what Jews call “anti-Semitism” could be finally eliminated — by negotiation, frank exchange, sharing of grievances, and building mutual good faith between Jews and Gentiles.

But of course the Jewish community as an organized group isn’t really interested in understanding “anti-Semitism.” On the contrary. It merely condemns and forbids it and that is all. In this regard, modern Jewry is obsessed with spirited censorship and myth-making towards the central premises of Darwinian self-survival or, much more correctly, tribal survival.

The key to understanding Jewish identity in 2005 is the Holocaust and Israel. Religious, racial, and ethnic Jewish identities morph and unmorph, overlap and underlap, but when the dust always settles it is Jewish fears of the omnipresent ‘anti-Semitic” boogeyman that represents the pillar of Jewish self-conception. And in the hidden Jewish torture chambers lies the heart of modern Jewish being: the military garrison state of Israel, sworn to the sword to protect the world’s diverse “stiff-necked” tribe — whoever they are, whatever they’ve done, to the very last man or woman.

Herein lies the pulse of today’s Jewish morality: corruption, deviance, exploitation, deception — anything to protect the Tribe. Universalistic moral precepts take second rung to the hysterically defensive Judeocentric injunction to defend the Tribe from all and any attack, large, small, or marginally perceptible. This includes the regular censorial exercise of smothering the smallest “anti-Semitic” kindling, lest it broaden its fire of complaint.

Enter Rabbi Daniel Lapin with dire warnings for deaf Jewish ears.

But not even Lapin (who ignores the unseemly premises of traditionally racist, segregationist Judaism as a self-defined Orthodox Jew) seems to understand the dire “evil” that weighs so heavily in the Jewish direction. The principle threat to Jewish survival is not a “second-coming” Holocaust, led by barbarous Jew-hating goyim, in physical form. It is courageous Jews like Rabbi Lapin himself, who may not grasp the totality of the problem at hand, but stands firmly, defiantly, along the right track (more or less), digging deeply for the moral threads of his identity. The greatest threat to collective Jewish survival comes not from Frankenstein-like “anti-Semites” and a world Islamic uprising. It comes from the potential “Holocaust” within the Jewish fortress line: the long, steady tradition of Jewish “self-hatred” (an in-house form of “anti-Semitism”) that has always paralleled — like a magnetic echo — Jewish self-obsession, self-delusion, and self-evasion. And this is what the formal Jewish community has always had to defend most robustly against.

Here lies the key to Jewish censorship and the profound dangers to Jews by dissident tribalists like Rabbi Lapin. In 2005, such a man is far more dangerous to Jewish comfort than any obscure anti-Jewish militants sporting red and white swastikas or an Arab “terrorist” sneaking over one of Israel’s Mordar Walls. If rank-and-file Jewry (let alone the Gentile world) were ever allowed to freely face the factual hypocrisies, paradoxes, and outrages of Jewish identity and history, the community would probably self-destruct with an exodus of shame and disillusionment. Rabbi Lapin, intended or not, points in that direction. He starts bluntly with massively visible Jewish deviance that inspired Germans against them. Robbed of their incessantly propagandistic “victim hero” status, many “born Jews” would inevitably migrate out of the Jewish Fortress Against Other People, seeking new identity allegiances rooted in negotiation with their common man: the generic “anti-Semite.”

Why did Hitler turn so vehemently against Jews? Rabbi Lapin directs us towards an honest answer, towards honest understanding, towards a true reconciliation. Introductions to the broader problems of Jewish attitude and hegemony in Germany’s pre-Nazi Weimar Republic start below.

And it should look familiar:

* Jewish dominance of German culture (private banking, film, the theatre, publishing, etc.), leading up to the Nazi take-over

* Jewish dominance of the international white slavery (sex trade) racket, leading up to the Nazi take-over

* Traditional (Yiddish) Jewish perceptions of non-Jews, leading up to the Nazi take-over

* Ultra-Orthodox dominance of many Eastern Europe’s Jewish communities, leading up to the Nazi take-over, and secular Israelis’ parallel condemnation/disdain of them


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 09/03/17 Jews Say Jump, Japanese Say How High?, or, If the Jews Hadn’t Tried to Sodomize Germany 38% similar
  3. 12/22/14 Swedish Jews? There’s No Such Thing 35% similar
  4. 01/28/16 Jews: Never to Blame. Whites: Always to Blame 32% similar
  5. 09/23/08 Secretary-General of the United Nations, His Excellency Ban Ki-moon and the Holocaust 29% similar
  6. 07/05/19 Why Are There So Many “Holocaust Survivors”? 28% similar
  7. 6 Responses to “Jews Pollute Culture to Wreck Nations”

    1. lawrence dennis Says:

      A recent article confirms much of what is discussed above:

      http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0200wales/tm_objectid=16828099&method=full&siteid=50082&headline=anger-as-rabbi-claims-anti-semitism-benefited-jews-over-the-centuries-name_page.html

      Fury at ‘anti-Semitism benefited Jews’ claim

      Rabbi Professor Cohn-Sherbok says that hatred of Jews has kept Judaism alive for thousands of years.

      But he argues that state of affairs is being threatened by the fact that anti-Semitism has gradually disappeared and in the last two centuries – with the exception of Nazi Germany – Jews have integrated into society.

      His book The Paradox Of Anti-Semitism will infuriate many members of the Jewish community across the world.

      Rabbi Cohn-Sherbok, a professor of Jewish theology at Lampeter, claimed the paradox affecting Judaism and Jewishness is something that can affect all minority groups – including the Welsh.

      He warned, “There is no solution to this problem. I don’t want anti-Semitism to continue, I want it to disappear but at the moment there is a risk the Jewish people will disappear if anti-Semitism disappears.”

      The comments sparked outrage from some Jews. Labour peer Lord Janner of Braunstone said he was “appalled”.

      Lord Janner, who was born in Cardiff, is a vice-chairman of the British Israel Parliamentary Group and was President of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, the main representative body of British Jewry, from 1978 to 1984.

      He is a key figure in efforts to seek compensation and restitution for Holocaust victims.

      Lord Janner said, “Anti-Semitism has been the scourge of the Jewish people. It was the basis on which Hitler wiped out some six million Jews.

      “I worked as a war crimes investigator and anti-Semitism was at the root of this. I do not agree with what he is saying. Anti-Semitism is an unmitigated evil.”

      Holocaust survivor Elen Davies, 77, from Swansea, said, “This man is asking for trouble for Jews. If that spreads then God help us all, because there are not that many of us left.

      “I’m absolutely livid that anybody could say this. I really can’t understand this.

      “As far as I’m concerned anti-Semitism is the vilest thing under the sun….”

      AND SO ON, FOREVER AND EVER

    2. Fenrir Says:

      “Robbed of their incessantly propagandistic “victim heroâ€? status, many “born Jewsâ€? would inevitably migrate out of the Jewish Fortress Against Other People, seeking new identity allegiances rooted in negotiation with their common man: the generic “anti-Semite.â€?”

      Heh, yeah right.

    3. alex Says:

      Jews marry out in record numbers today because our culture is so jewed the less paranoid jews have trouble distinguishing by the ancient code. America has come to think like a jew, as Dershowitz and others have observed. However, the leavers tend to return to the tribe in times of crisis, and the remaining jews are ever more hostile and paranoid and dangerous to the rest of us.

      Jews could choose to be a helpful middleman minority. They could get rich and no one would care. They could practice bizarre ways and no one would care. They could be hooknosed Amish, and no one would care. But they choose to destroy their host and lie about it and exalt themselves as little hooknosed slices of heaven on earth. Increasing numbers of us Aryans do notice that, and we do resent their ways, and we do fight them.

      The enmity the jew has encountered on this earth is entirely due to his behavior. That is a truth no rabbi can gainsay.

    4. Don Miller Says:

      While Rabbi Lapin may be a sparkling gem amongst the dross, in fact he has the nasty habit of seeing himself in a supremacy position above other religious and ethnic groups simply by his claim to have the right to name us “gentiles” and smother our diversities.

      In line three of his quotation at the very beginning of this piece, Lapin betrays his own bigotry, namely that he and his cousins are one group, and that we and all the various peoples of the world are another single, undifferentiated group.

      Someone needs to tell Lapin that we are perfectly qualified to name ourselves. While this complaint may seem beside the point to some, in fact it is well known that the first sign of oppression is that someone else names you, and that the second sign of oppresion is that you accept the name.

      Smack the Jews upside their heads until they get it that we are not “gentiles” and do not want their name for us.

      Philosophically the word “gentiles” represents a peculiar breed of essentialism and reductionism, and in practice it stands on a claim of supremacy.

    5. alex Says:

      Given half a chance, jews will attempt to mediate anything. Only through them can you gain access to whatever you seek.

      WE DON’T NEED JEWS.

      That’s the simple truth. The White man doesn’t need jews. They’re injurious. They damage our society. They make us worse off in many ways. When we point out what they’re doing, they call us haters and anti-semites.

    6. Jesse Says:

      Jews see themselves as different from the majority people in whatever nation they reside. It is the sense of division from the main stem that gives them an internalized sense of opposition to the people where they are placed.

      In Europe, when the Jews invaded to escape from Khasaria when hordes of eastern people overran their nation, they faced new non-Jewish populations. Their method of coping and maintaining their culture was to build Jewish Havens with walls to keep Jews in and Gentiles out. These “ghettos” were purely Jewish in nature and were for protection and isolation.

      The irony is that the Jews today try to claw every nation where they live into refusing such “reservations” for races and to integrate (destroy) all such habitats.

      In some ways, this destructive Jewish penetration of majority culture and its destruction is a reaction to the marginalization of the Jews themselves who have no culture, no language except an old dead one, and an almost total loss of religion as 75% of Jews are athiests.