Vanguard News Network

Christian Fortunes Parallel White Volk
(Apollonian, 28 Mar 06)

Well don’t forget “Olde Dutch,” Hitler was designed to lose, and it was desperate going there for a while as American Jew communists actually thought they might lose it all if Uncle Joe Stalin got rolled up so easily.

Thus United States of WWII so desperately built up Stalin’s army and supplied it better than they supplied their own–this is mere documented fact. The first American-allied priority was to prop up Stalin, and Christianity lost horribly as we know, ah well.

CONCLUSION: Note as Christianity lost, white folk lost. Linder/VNN blames Christianity, but what was at fault was an old Christian culture eaten in hubris and Pelagian heresy among others, like non-racism, non-antisemitism, etc., the Spenglerian “Decline of the West.” Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

Notice the difference between the IHR and the scotsman.com. The discovery of a phrase book becomes a possible campaign through Scotland and not what it most likely was, a need to communicate with a defeated enemy by an invading Soviet army. Start with what it can’t be, Germany’s justified offensive against Soviet Russia and from there let the assumptions fly . . . .a Russian offensive through Scotland against Germany?

I never got why the Germans just did not create a bio-weapon and extreminate the mass of all the Russians, but where decided to take on 10 plus, to 1 odds in convential warfare.

No that shit on a shit jesus, and his wacky kike death cult, does not help the Aryan Race. But it sure helps the forces of degeneration and death. Satan on the other hand is the better choice.

having read numerous books on the subject of ww2, I was always unimpressed with the theory hitler gave up on england because of a stalemate in the air.
hitler still had enough air resources in the theater to occupy what was left of the british fighter screen, while still have assets for dive bombers and medium bombers to harry any ground defence and support the invasion.
within the last year or so i followed a link to book review reportedly written by a russian general under an alias, insisting that the poor performance of the russian military in the first year of the war was due to their army being in offensive lager’s because their invasion of the west was iminent.

Nothing new here, this subject was covered extensively in Viktor Suvorov’s book “Icebreaker”. Given the evidence, there can be no doubt Barbarossa was a preemptive strike intended to stop an imminent Soviet attack on Germany and the strategically important Romanian oil fields. By the way, you history buffs out there won’t want to miss “SS Doomtroopers” this weekend on the Scifi channel. No doubt this will be another painstaking researched effort by Hollywood Jews to set the record straight by accurately depicting the Nazi SS as they really were instead of the bizarre monsters as invariably portrayed by jew propagandists.

Excerpt from one of my letters written in Jan 2004

“As an amateur historian I never could reconcile Hitler’s seemingly insane attack on Russia. With the then current success of the German Army, only a fool would have opened a second front and attacked Russia with winter coming on. Whatever one might think of Hitler and his policies I have never heard anyone accuse Hitler of being a fool. Hitler was in fact a voracious reader and I cannot believe that somehow he missed all the historical references to Napoleon’s winter defeat in Russia some 130 years before. Nothing in Hitler’s operation “Barbarossa” ever made sense to me; why would such an astute individual make such an incredible tactical blunder? More so why would Hitler’s generals support him in the blunder called Barbarossa? And there were few if any voices among the high command against Operation Barbarossa. Yeah, I know, the typical response is that Hitler was such an incredible tyrant that no general would dare oppose his military plans, but anyone who ever read past their eighth grade history book or doesn’t get their historical information from the “History Channel” knows this was not the case, there simply was no recorded major opposition to Hitler’s Operation Barbarossa – Why? Surely there would have been some major outcry recorded among the high command for making such a foolish military commitment, especially when considering the overwhelming success of the German Army at that point in time. I have found a book that makes the only plausible explanation for this supposed blunder. I urge you to find a copy of Viktor Suvorov’s “Icebreaker” and read it carefully Hitler’s “sorry war strategy” known as Operation Barbarossa will make perfect sense after you read this book, below is a summary of the book. Accepted history is seldom what actually happened and when it comes to “conventional” WWII history there is almost no truth in any of it. Over fifty years after the end of the second world war, at least in regards to Germany and the third Reich, we are still subjected to the same incredibly blatant propaganda that was in overwhelming evidence during the conflict, one has to wonder why that might be at this late stage.”

Arch Stanton

Arch, brilliant essay; that’s why I say we need to improve by means of the inspiration of Saint Constantine the Great who rallied an entire culture, not just one doomed and beset nation, great as it was, dear Germany. Apollonian

Bingo, again, Arch. There are several other recent good books in English about Hitler`s “Ost Fehler”. Hoffmann, Topitsch , Magenheimer and Weeks, to name some of them. The material in German is amazing and plentiful, but it never gets translated into English, unfortunately. Hello, Mark Weber of the IHR, where are you??? Besides never getting distributed in the Anglophone world because of the Juden Zensur, this type of real history is rarely read by the brain dead, because of their ‘a priori’ negative fixations about the Third Reich. Remember, the English speaking world is “proud of its ignorance”, a unique foible, which drives all white nationalist up a wall.