5 April, 2006

Debunking the Coverers-Up

Posted by alex in Letters, WTC demolition at 5:09 pm | Permanent Link

Mr. Linder,

Here is a link which assails the Popular Mechanics article which is now linked on the forum, in the thread you started concerning the WTC. http://911review.com/pm/markup/index.html The site http://911review.com seems scientific and comprehensive. It addresses every issue and cites countless sources, including mainstream ones. Particularly useful for VNN, perhaps, is the “Information Warfare” section which exposes the shabby tactics used to discredit rational inquiry. It criticizes the pod-planes theory and Morgan Reynolds in the Trojan Horse subsection.

I remember, on the night after the attacks, one of the cable-news stations of a major network rebroadcast the aftermath of the collapse of the towers. A reporter came up to two black firemen and asked what happened to cause the collapse. They replied it was an explosion. The reporter pressed them, and they insisted that it was ,indeed, an explosion. No doubt they were part of a conspiracy of Creationists and Holocaust Deniers, if you believe Michael Shermer. There is more evidence to show that the WTC was blown up than there is that Scott Peterson killed his wife, and he’s on death row.

When are eyewitnesses not considered evidence at a crime scene? When there is a cover-up.

–Carl


  • 8 Responses to “Debunking the Coverers-Up”

    1. alex Says:

      “Loose Change” shows all kinds of people saying there were all kinds of explosions going off in the WTC.

    2. GasJews Says:

      This “Popular Mechanics issue last March was written by 25 year old “senior researcher” BENJAMIN CHERTOFF, folks.

      Michael Chertoff’s cousin.

      911 – JEW WORLD ORDER

    3. seelow heights Says:

      “A reporter came up to two black firemen and asked what happened to cause the collapse. They replied it was an explosion. The reporter pressed them, and they insisted that it was ,indeed, an explosion. No doubt they were part of a conspiracy of Creationists and Holocaust Deniers, if you believe Michael Shermer. ”
      What do a couple of “affirmative action” niggers know?

    4. Dean Says:

      (What do a couple of “affirmative action� niggers know? )
      Niggers aren’t the brightest bulb on the tree and if explosions were obvious enough for ‘AA’ niggers to notice then it’s probably got a fairly good likelyhood of being correct.

    5. Sulla Says:

      When airplane fuel spews all over the place I’m sure *explosions* will occur. I don’t know what happened, however, it doesn’t help that soon after the usual hysterical conspiratologists were gibbering their inside job mantra before they even had any “evidence” along with the rubble still belching smoke.

      Do I think the mossad had a hand? Probably. Do I think a remote controlled plane was involved and charges detonated inside the WTC? That, my friends, is an extraordinary claim, which requires extraordinary evidence.

      Belief does not equal fact. I’m highly skeptical of all this inside job horseshit. Largely because the messengers are usually quacks or want it so bad they have this tendency to make the facts FIT the theory. I’ve seen these dolts do this with a host of other issues like Freemasons, Bohemian Grove, and other events/groups. Their claims are never modest, always big and grandiose.

    6. JoeSixPack Says:

      “Their claims are never modest, always big and grandiose.”

      Conspiracies aren’t usually modest either.

    7. alex Says:

      Horseshit is talking about dripping fuel and explosions. There is no reasonable doubt the buildings were demolished.

    8. Edward Teach Says:

      Whatever the official ZOGUSA story is, pick any other explanation – whatever it is – and you’ll be closer to the truth of the matter.