Vanguard News Network

Si ustedes pretenden callar a estos Inmigrantes con sus armas, esperen que seran arrestados por violacion a los Derechos Humanos.

Esto no es Alemania Nazi esto es ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA

Ellos son seres Humanos que trabajan y ni usted ni nadie tiene el derecho de arrebatarles la vida. Respete porque usted esta en un pais Libre y Democratico, por esa razon es que esas personas vienen a este marvilloso pais , porque hay Libertrad de expresion, raza y religion.

Ustedes son minorias ahora y seran apresados si intentan asesinar a algun ser Humano sea Inmigante o Legislador no lo duden ustedes no estan en una Republica como Alemania o Cuba , o Venezuela usted esta en LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA QUE SE CREO DE INMIGRANTES DE MUCHOS PAISES. LEA SU HISTORIA PARA QUE APRENDA.

(Above translated by computer) (m g reyes)

If you intend to silence these Immigrants with their weapons, they expect that to be arrested by violacion to the Human Rights.

This is not Germany Nazi this is United States OF AMERICA

They are Human beings that work and neither you neither nobody has the right to snatch them the life. Respect because you this in a pies Free and Democratico, by that razon is that those people come to this marvilloso pies, because there is Libertrad of expresion, race and religion.

You are minorias now and to be rushed if they try to murder to algun human being be Inmigante or Legislator they doubt not it you are not in a Republic as Germany or Cuba, or Venezuela you this in THE United States OF AMERICA THAT I am BELIEVED OF IMMIGRANTS OF MANY COUNTRIES. READ ITS HISTORY SO THAT LEARN.

the Soviet Union was a multi cultural socialist empire.
what is the united states?
a multicultural socialist empire.

Americans don’t know shit from shinola about anything. You could test them on marxism, nazism, republicanism, they wouldn’t have any idea what was what. They’ve done tests and found most think ‘from each according to his ability to each according to his need’ is in the Constitution. All they know, or from the jew’s perch need to know, is that is something is branded nazi, you must hate it with all your heart. The minute someone or thing appears to thwart Israelis or local parasites, even theoretically 100 years from now, the ashis and their appeasatariat set up yowl on islamofascism or variant. We can change a minds of a minority of the inquisitive, but sea change only comes after we disposses the jews and take over behind the amplifiers.

I’m not sure which number this one is on my informal, “How to know you’re being hustled” list (maybe right after, “It’s NEVER about the money”) but “They’re NOT idiots” is right up there. They know exactly what they’re saying. And for all of you who’ve fallen for the “Bush-is-an-idiot/insane” nonsense, THIS IS AN ACT, people! I once studied conjuring with a New York jew (stage magic is a jew thing) and believe me, they know how to hustle the sucker like dogs know how to bark. They know what you’re thinking literally before you think it…because they control the WHOLE game: a jew NEVER NEVER NEVER plays a “game” he can lose. If he’s playing, you’ve already lost. Which is why you can’t beat him at his own game — watching the jew-toob selectively, for example. The ONLY way to win is to walk away. And anyone who thinks otherwise is prime suckermeat. Don’t think so? Then dig this: here’s the SECRET of the shell game: the pea isn’t under ANY of the shells until you choose! That’s right — the hustler sweeps the pea off the table with a flick of the pinky while you’re distracted. He’s got another one clipped in his palm, which he will deftly place under the shell you don’t pick (after you guess wrong) to show you that, yes, the pea was really there. I watched a guy do it right in front of me and didn’t see him do it, even after he told me how he did it! Well, there’s your analog of everything the jew does. So THROW AWAY the jew-toob and walk away from his “games.” They aren’t games, they’re theft. And EVERYTHING that comes out of the toob is a virus.

It’s true the jews do know what they’re doing. It’s been reported bush’s flubs are scripted. The Sam Francis school encourages outsiders to think themselves smarter than the Republicans who keep on winning elections.

How wet white liberals became the ultimate black joke

The Sunday TimesApril 09, 2006

How wet white liberals became the ultimate black joke
Politically correct do-gooders do more harm than they know, says Nirpal
Singh Dhaliwal

Reading about the decision by the Crown Prosecution Service to prosecute a
10-year-old child for using the word “Paki” last week, got me thinking about
the paranoia and confusion around the issue of race nowadays. When I was
called a Paki at school, it was often by black kids who I’d cuss back at
with racist barbs of my own. It was part of the ignorant ruck-and-maul of
growing up working-class in multi-ethnic west London. But the strange logics
that surround race aren’t confined to the rough children of the lower
orders.
My friend Diane, a black single mother, lives next door to a lovely
middle-class white family. She told me an interesting story. The neighbour
had ticked off her adolescent son for using street slang rather than correct
English; the boy then accused his mum of racism for disliking “black” argot.
Given that Diane is scrupulous in ensuring her own son is well spoken and
articulate, this provided food for thought. It shows how well-meaning white
people, even the young, can have extremely misplaced ideas.

The 14-year-old boy next door is a sweet kid, but had assumed that
trash-talk is the way black people speak and is a valid language in its own
right. Diane doesn’t even let her six-year-old son watch MTV in case he
imbibes retarded notions about how he should behave from rap videos made by
multinational white-bread corporations.
Gangsta rap makes millions by pandering to a middle-class fetish. It doesn’t
make money out of kids in the ‘hood; they buy their music bootlegged or copy
it from friends. But white suburbanites donate a fortune to crotch-grabbing
dummies who prance around “keeping it real” for their delectation.
Diane is rightly disgusted by the misogyny and homophobia that often make up
the lyrics. She has high hopes for her children, and doesn’t want them
ruined by the music industry myth that the epitome of blackness is to be a
scumbag who brags of abusing black women and killing black men.
White people murder and peddle drugs, too, but those themes don’t dominate
the music white people make. Gangsta rap and its British equivalent, grime,
take one sordid fact of human life and explode it out of all proportion, so
it appears to be definitive. But the naive white kids who buy into it would
never consider themselves to be racist. They see themselves as right-on
hipsters who sympathise with the black experience.
Groovy white liberals can pose serious problems to ethnic minorities in this
country. They contributed to some of the most enjoyable and least productive
moments of my childhood. I went to an all-boys comprehensive school in
Ealing; the pupils were overwhelmingly black and Asian. Some, like me, were
the children of Indian immigrants, others, refugees from Somalia, Iran,
Armenia . . .
We’d often get a fresh-faced, idealistic teacher who had no doubt read Marx
and Malcolm X and done an elective in post-colonial theory at polytechnic.
We ate those suckers alive.
Desperate to empathise with our persecution, they were knocked dead by our
indifference and rampant misbehaviour. At the first sniff of guilt-ridden
middle-class weakness, the feral instincts of teenage boys were unleashed
and the class descended into anarchy. They thought we’d been crazed by
oppression, so didn’t want to come down too hard on us. They wanted to
understand instead. When it did get too much for them and they threatened to
march one of us to the headmaster’s office, our immediate protest would be:
“You’re a racist!”
They’d cower behind their desks, mortified that we’d recognised some deeply
suppressed prejudice within them, while we got back to hurling insults,
beating the crap out of each other and rolling joints to smoke at lunchtime.
The softest touches were always female. For many women, empathy and
“emotional literacy” (whatever the hell that is) are a greater priority in
the workplace than actually doing the job they’re paid to do. We had a whale
of a time whenever a liberal white female was in charge.
A stalwart gang of diehard traditionalists prevented us from leaving school
illiterate. Chief among them was Mr Garrett, my form tutor. He was an
imposing behemoth of a man, who couldn’t have cared less about our ethnicity
and historical subjugation. He had high expectations of how we should behave
and apply ourselves, and flew into thunderous, terrifying rages whenever we
failed to meet them.
He was the kind of guy who’d never get a job in education today. For some
kids he was the most solid male presence they had in their lives. Whenever I
bump into former classmates in my old neighbourhood, he’s the teacher we
remember most fondly, wondering how he’s doing now. He didn’t always have
our affection, but he commanded our respect. He saw enough innate worth in
us to set us standards and be bitterly disappointed when we fell short.
Things are very different today. I have a friend who teaches, and he says it’s
normal for teachers not to reprimand badly behaved black kids because “they
suffer enough oppression as it is”. The soft bigotry of wet liberals is as
insidious as the racism of white supremacists. Lowering the bar for children
because you consider them oppressed has the same effect as expecting little
of them because you think them inferior.
We could never pull our stunts on Mr Garrett. He was hard on us all – black,
white and brown – but rigorously fair. I can still remember his face, purple
with anger, as he folded and refolded a piece of paper, straining to control
his temper after I’d been reported to him for a misdemeanour. He was the
only teacher who ever inspired shame in me.

Yes, I AM one of the “Teds” that Max Hadden speaks of up at the top of this page.

And it’s all too clear, that he has suffered from an overdose of Fox “News” from the screws – those same idiots who had the slogan “all the news you need to know.” Who the hell are they to tell us what we need to know? Fascists.

I stand behind every word of what I wrote in every essay. I don’t hide under phony names and hotmail addresses. No need to. I state the facts and let them fall where they may. To
“think” that the third Riech was the last one is to believe that communism is dead. Has anyone ever considered that it wasn’t just a name, but the THIRD attempt?

There is no need to resort to slamming an author who speaks the truth. To do so, merely states a strong argument for intentional intellectual stupidity.

Have a nice day.