1 April, 2006

Is Libertarianism an Intellectual Form of Effeminacy?

Posted by alex in libertarians at 6:18 am | Permanent Link

The philosopher Thomas Hobbes believed that there can never be harmony in a community unless there is a government; some person or group exercising the power to coerce the rest. As Hans-Hermann Hoppe has pointed out, it is a logical consequence of this view that if 2 men live together, isolated from other people, one of them would have to be the ruler, or else there would be no end to their fighting lest death. This conclusion is obviously ludicrous…

Is it?

Men rarely look in each other’s eyes, whereas women can’t get enough of direct contact. Men are animals, and staring equals testing, or at least pre-fight measuring of strength. It is quite possible these libermartians don’t realize this because like women they gaze lovingly at each other to gauge, hell i don’t know, willingness to engage in licit acts of intercourse?

If not libertarians, then humans, at least, have a pecking order – always, everywhere.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/katz-j4.html


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 06/10/11 Libertarianism: Another Mind-Trap for the Goyim 18% similar
  3. 07/22/17 Thoughts On Feminism 12% similar
  4. 09/05/17 An Anti-Fascist Statement 10% similar
  5. 08/28/07 Russo Redux (Sort Of) 10% similar
  6. 09/16/11 MacDonald: The Republican Party Is Doomed 6% similar
  7. 7 Responses to “Is Libertarianism an Intellectual Form of Effeminacy?”

    1. Mia Says:

      umm , wouldn’t that be “illicit” acts? Maybe it’s because it’s April 1st, right? ;-D

    2. apollonian Says:

      Jew Katz, the author of this blog essay (fm LewRockwell.com) in question, asks the following:

      “Where did people get the stupid idea that, since there are a bunch of students on campus, they ought to elect a president?”

      CONCLUSION: And my answer is to promote antisemitism, obviously. For any other course may promote anti-thematic Judaism, and this concern herein analyzed is the very REFUTATION OF “LIBERTARIAN”-styled “Anarchism,” Q.E.D. Look for more antisemitic exposition by Apollonian on NewNation.org under “commentary” heading. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

    3. Alex Linder Says:

      Libermartians are highly law-abiding. The sublime pleasures of licit intercourse with one’s agora-mates outweigh fleshly delights.

    4. Harry Tuttle Says:

      Libertarians are jew-foiled goys taught that to withdraw from the field if the rules are corrupt is more noble than to enter the fray. Since any jew controlled society will be run with complete injustice and no free market system, this effectively turns all the goyim into ass-grabbing lily-livered cowards who won’t even put up a fight. The jews will have you thinking that living out of a cardboard box with holes punched in the top for air is the only alternative for the wise goyim who cares about the rule of law. Meanwhile, they’ll stick your daughter in black-on-white group fellatio scenes and turn your son into a pierced nipple whigger. Be noble in your box, goyim. Someday they’ll all play by the rules, you betcha.

    5. apollonian Says:

      Never Forget Cycle Theory Context (Spengler)
      (Apollonian, 2 Apr 06)

      Jews must recede at moment of victory, destroying host they feed fm. Then Judaic parasite would consume itself. (Biological facts, I’m afraid.) Christ pointed this internal contradiction out; but Pharisaic-conspiratorial leaders decided to kill messenger. The son of God himself wasn’t good enough for the Pharisees and Sadducees, these creatures pursued by God, as they believe, like male pursues female, Jews so understood collectivistically. Thus more people become aware of Jews; fearing then, they will become good enough Christians; hence we work on simple heresy of “Judeo-Christians” (JCs), to counter-act gross heresy, immediately. Such is good part of my plan, there being more details (at NewNation.org under “commentary”). Thanks. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

    6. Carpenter Says:

      Libertarians themselves show that someone will always be on top, setting the rules. Show up at a Libertarian Party meeting and speak up on race, say you don’t want your children to marry non-Whites – and you’ll be thrown out. They say you can have whatever opinions you want personally and you’re all just organizing to smash the oppressive State, but it turns out you can’t have whatever opinions you want.

      When there is no freedom of speech or beliefs even in libertarian circles, how can there be elsewhere?

    7. Carpenter Says:

      Joshua Katz [send him mail] is a graduate student in philosophy at Texas A&M. He has studied philosophy of mind, logic, and epistemology of economics from an Austrian perspective.

      The Jew should get out more.

      Ever been off the beaten track with a group of people and run into a problem? Someone will always end up on top. And since you’re going to set up the tent and gather food for the entire group, you’ll force the slackers to do as you say and get in with the program, regardless of whether they’re shouting “Freedom!” or shouting “Fuck you, fascist!” Since they’ll benefit from what the group does, they’ll have to follow the group’s rules. Also, lack of authority means the criminal will have a field day. That’s true of every country. So there can be no libertarianism.