12 April, 2006

Jew Hearts Beat Quicker as Truth about WTC Demolitions Approaches Undeniable

Posted by alex in WTC demolition at 11:20 pm | Permanent Link

[What price should jews pay for lying about WTC demolitions and getting thousands of White boys killed in Iraq? I say jews merit a collective death sentence. After all, this aren’t the first buildings and wars they’ve rigged – merely the latest. ITZ COMING.]

Y. professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC

By Elaine Jarvik
Deseret Morning News

The physics of 9/11 — including how fast and symmetrically one of the World Trade Center buildings fell — prove that official explanations of the collapses are wrong, says a Brigham Young University physics professor.

In fact, it’s likely that there were “pre-positioned explosives” in all three buildings at ground zero, says Steven E. Jones.

In a paper posted online Tuesday and accepted for peer-reviewed publication next year, Jones adds his voice to those of previous skeptics, including the authors of the Web site www.wtc7.net, whose research Jones quotes. Jones’ article can be found at


Stuart Johnson, Deseret Morning News
“It is quite plausible that explosives were pre-planted in all three (WTC) buildings,” BYU physics professor Steven E. Jones says.

Jones, who conducts research in fusion and solar energy at BYU, is calling for an independent, international scientific investigation “guided not by politicized notions and constraints but rather by observations and calculations.

“It is quite plausible that explosives were pre-planted in all three buildings and set off after the two plane crashes — which were actually a diversion tactic,” he writes. “Muslims are (probably) not to blame for bringing down the WTC buildings after all,” Jones writes.

As for speculation about who might have planted the explosives, Jones said, “I don’t usually go there. There’s no point in doing that until we do the scientific investigation.”

Previous investigations, including those of FEMA, the 9/11 Commission and NIST (the National Institutes of Standards and Technology), ignore the physics and chemistry of what happened on Sept. 11, 2001, to the Twin Towers and the 47-story building known as WTC 7, he says. The official explanation — that fires caused structural damage that caused the buildings to collapse — can’t be backed up by either testing or history, he says.
Jones acknowledges that there have been “junk science” conspiracy theories about what happened on 9/11, but “the explosive demolition hypothesis better satisfies tests of repeatability and parsimony and therefore is not ‘junk science.’ ”

In a 9,000-word article that Jones says will be published in the book “The Hidden History of 9/11,” by Elsevier, Jones offers these arguments:

• The three buildings collapsed nearly symmetrically, falling down into their footprints, a phenomenon associated with “controlled demolition” — and even then it’s very difficult, he says. “Why would terrorists undertake straight-down collapses of WTC-7 and the Towers when ‘toppling over’ falls would require much less work and would do much more damage in downtown Manhattan?” Jones asks. “And where would they obtain the necessary skills and access to the buildings for a symmetrical implosion anyway? The ‘symmetry data’ emphasized here, along with other data, provide strong evidence for an ‘inside’ job.”

• No steel-frame building, before or after the WTC buildings, has ever collapsed due to fire. But explosives can effectively sever steel columns, he says.

• WTC 7, which was not hit by hijacked planes, collapsed in 6.6 seconds, just .6 of a second longer than it would take an object dropped from the roof to hit the ground. “Where is the delay that must be expected due to conservation of momentum, one of the foundational laws of physics?” he asks. “That is, as upper-falling floors strike lower floors — and intact steel support columns — the fall must be significantly impeded by the impacted mass. . . . How do the upper floors fall so quickly, then, and still conserve momentum in the collapsing buildings?” The paradox, he says, “is easily resolved by the explosive demolition hypothesis, whereby explosives quickly removed lower-floor material, including steel support columns, and allow near free-fall-speed collapses.” These observations were not analyzed by FEMA, NIST nor the 9/11 Commission, he says.

• With non-explosive-caused collapse there would typically be a piling up of shattering concrete. But most of the material in the towers was converted to flour-like powder while the buildings were falling, he says. “How can we understand this strange behavior, without explosives? Remarkable, amazing — and demanding scrutiny since the U.S. government-funded reports failed to analyze this phenomenon.”

• Horizontal puffs of smoke, known as squibs, were observed proceeding up the side the building, a phenomenon common when pre-positioned explosives are used to demolish buildings, he says.

• Steel supports were “partly evaporated,” but it would require temperatures near 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit to evaporate steel — and neither office materials nor diesel fuel can generate temperatures that hot. Fires caused by jet fuel from the hijacked planes lasted at most a few minutes, and office material fires would burn out within about 20 minutes in any given location, he says.

• Molten metal found in the debris of the World Trade Center may have been the result of a high-temperature reaction of a commonly used explosive such as thermite, he says. Buildings not felled by explosives “have insufficient directed energy to result in melting of large quantities of metal,” Jones says.

• Multiple loud explosions in rapid sequence were reported by numerous observers in and near the towers, and these explosions occurred far below the region where the planes struck, he says.

Jones says he became interested in the physics of the WTC collapse after attending a talk last spring given by a woman who had had a near-death experience. The woman mentioned in passing that “if you think the World Trade Center buildings came down just due to fire, you have a lot of surprises ahead of you,” Jones remembers, at which point “everyone around me started applauding.”
Following several months of study, he presented his findings at a talk at BYU in September.
Jones says he would like the government to release 6,899 photographs and 6,977 segments of video footage for “independent scrutiny.” He would also like to analyze a small sample of the molten metal found at Ground Zero.

E-mail: [email protected]

  1. Similar posts:

  2. 09/09/06 BYU’s Jones Put on Leave for Showing Up ZOG Liars 44% similar
  3. 01/13/08 Free Talk Live 01/13/08 “9/11 and The Israeli Connection” Part 2 32% similar
  4. 12/23/06 Ehud & the Dirty Yahoodis’ Connection to WTC Demolitions 31% similar
  5. 03/23/06 WTC Demolitions: Chutzpah’s Finest Hour 29% similar
  6. 05/11/07 Revenge of the zioNerds VII: The New Pearl Harbor 22% similar
  7. 11 Responses to “Jew Hearts Beat Quicker as Truth about WTC Demolitions Approaches Undeniable”

    1. Carpenter Says:

      “It is quite plausible that explosives were pre-planted in all three buildings and set off after the two plane crashes — which were actually a diversion tactic,� he writes. “Muslims are (probably) not to blame for bringing down the WTC buildings after all,� Jones writes.

      Of course, if this catches on so much that the media will switch to supporting the idea of explosives, then there will appear an Islamist connection.

      About WTC 7: I have searched at length and found no official explanation for the building. If it was brought down by explosives, have you ever thought of what an astonishingly bad idea it was? If you don’t have a plane crashing into the building, then how are you going to explain it? Why do it at all?

    2. alex Says:

      They just claim more debris hit it than they first thought. jews are arrogant. only their media control and their belief they can get away with anything would lead them to do this.

    3. GasEmAll Says:

      I’d love to see the blonde Steven Jones destroy the kikes once and for all.

    4. Jack Burns Says:

      Jewish arrogance causes them to overreach, always, which is exactly the reason they’ve been expelled from every country ignorant enough to host them. I only hope I live long enough to see that happen here, or worse — i.e., better!

    5. sr Says:

      What if the planes had missed? Would the explosives have been removed quietly? What does this theory explain, anyway?

    6. alex Says:

      Uh…how the buildings fell down?

    7. Arch Stanton Says:

      Before Waco was finished, I knew that government troops would purposefully murder the Branch Davidians. It was obvious by the government’s actions that they did not want a peaceful resolution to the problem – they wanted the Davidians dead. After the government’s commission of this heinous murder, the following evidence fully vindicated my earlier suppositions about the government’s actions. Everyone close to Waco at the time knew the official media coverage was nothing but lies or half-truths at best. Even the local sheriff was baffled why the government’s troops would take the course of action it did in trying to end the situation, unless of course they wanted Koresh and company dead.

      A few years later, it took but one look at the photos of the Murrah building to conclude there was no possible way an external explosion could have resulted in the destruction of that building. From my limited experience with explosives, I knew that a truck parked across the street could not produce the necessary force that would result in the extensive damage visible in the photo. It was also obvious that an external explosion would not result in the exposed girders pointing outwards, towards the explosive force

      Obviously, the government felt the remains of the Murrah building presented damming evidence because, like the trade towers, they destroyed the evidence as quickly as possible. Soon after the event, mounting evidence provided damming details like the fact that no government agents showed up for work that day, a normal weekday. All the evidence scraped together by third parties and even some by the government itself, fully vindicated my beliefs about the government’s destruction of its own building.

      One big advantage the destruction of the Murrah building provided for the government was dissolving the so-called militia and the accompanying patriot movement. This was accomplished by supposedly supporting the absurd concept of an oppressed government under siege. If we are to believe the media, that hoaxed up impression was enough to send the patriots back to their sofa with a beer in hand. But of course it makes sense, after all wasn’t McVeigh himself a militia patriot? Pay no attention to the fact he had also been an official member of the US Army just a short time before the Murrah building explosion.

      Of course the trade towers is the most obvious hoax to date, with itty-bitty jets hitting the tops of the huge buildings and bringing down these immense structure designed to withstand just such an impact as neatly as a highly paid demolition expert. Once again the supporting evidence for the government’s complicity in the matter is overwhelming, like the fact that no jews showed up for work that day and the defense command was stood down so no military aircraft, armed or otherwise, showed up on the scene. And then there was the matter of every associated Israeli being deported as quickly as possible and the fact that no one but the Israelis actually benefited from the attack on the trade towers. Like the Murrah building, the wreckage was again destroyed as quickly as possible so no real examination of the remains could be performed.

      Therefore, while the big brain at BYU examines the leaves of the tree for evidence of poison, no one bothers to look at the forest dying around them. How much evidence will it take before we “believe” that it was not a bunch of unorganized rag headed terrorists armed with box cutters that destroyed the trade towers? How brilliant do we have to be to understand there is an agenda being worked upon us? Figure it out America, the government is performing these acts of terrorist atrocities for a specific purpose; the real question is not the government’s role in these acts but what purpose might be found in the commission of these acts of terror.

      Obviously in the case of the trade towers, the government wanted to foment a war with Iraq; but in the bigger picture, each of these incidents tests the American public’s reaction to such cataclysm. Will the bovina panic? Will they take up arms in revolution as they began to do after Waco? If so how do we the government disarm the bovina, both literally and figuratively? How can the bovina be corralled and pacified after such incidents so they continue to accept the government’s demands upon them? Each of these incidents also is one-step further in numbing the bovina to such destruction. By the time the government pulls off the big one, like Nuking Los Angeles, the bovina will be sufficiently numbed to the point where everyone will do nothing more than emit a huge, collective gasp and then leave for work as usual. Anyone care to take bets just how many Hollywood jews will vacationing in Israel that day?

      The importance of the government keeping the people impotent and pacified should be obvious. Whatever evil the government plans to work, the majority will need to stay in line and keep things running, it must be business as usual or the whole charade might just collapse around the global elite’s ears. Everyone, even those without a degree in astrophysics from MIT, should be able to grasp these simple and obvious concepts. However, putting the big brain on it is just one more government twist on the matter.

      Obviously, as stupid bovina, we must leave the conclusive proof for these disasters to the big brains. Obviously, a stupid herd member such as yourself could never trust his own, terribly speculative, conclusions, therefore we have well paid, highly educated, big brains to do the thinking for you. As you all know, absolute and incontrovertible proof must be provided by big brains before any action can be taken. Of course, such proof takes time – lots and lots of time. In fact so much time is needed the event usually becomes ancient history before any real conclusive proof can be presented verified, but isn’t that just how things work out?

      So do as the government tells you stupid sheeple, shut up and go back to work. Do not question any government action, do not attempt thinking, leave the thinking to the big brains hired by your government. Instead you must obey, sleep, marry and reproduce (not you whitey). Always remember – your government is your god!

    8. Harry Tuttle Says:

      I figured out within three minutes of the second tower dropping what was going on.

      I pity the so-called “superior” white race that it doesn’t have sufficient brains to have deduced what a sham it was by now.

      Two steel buildings falling straight down into their own footprints starting from the top within twenty minutes of being struck, neither one of them burning long enough for any serious structural damage?

      If 200 million suckers have not figured it out by now, five years later … seriously, how can they hope to outwit jews?

      In retrospect, it was all so phoney it’s almost as dated as the special effects in EARTH VS. THE FLYING SAUCERS. Anybody with a pulse should have realized it was bullshit by this time. It was that obvious.

      Not the best of the heebie picture shows at all. I’ve seen better.

    9. whiteskelet Says:

      If the thesis is:

      Fake WTC collapse => justify war in Iraq

      Why hasn’t the US government – or anybody else – done something as simple as plant fake WMD in Iraq, or just commanded the media that they lie to the public?

      Couldn’t it rather be a quick decision and improvised action? “So, the bastards strike WTC, we’ll finish the job rather than risk more damage in NY?” Like it has been pointed out, it was proper work. It wouldn’t have been announced because a trade-off was made between risk of property lo$$ and human lives.

      As for Jews not showing up for work, is it a fact or a mere Muslim rumour?

    10. Coup d'Etat Says:

      It is a fact that jews will create any disaster to reboot the economy, while killing thousands in the process. If they can mass murder Whites while making loads of cash and influence politics in their favor, boy, what a fabulous way to get everything in one pot and run with it.

      The demise of the Great Depression and the sharp decline in stocks in 1987 are no different. By the way, both incidents occurred on Monday – a coincidence?

      The Federal Reserve Bank started in 1913, which the FRB caused the Great Depression in the 1930’s. A large number of Whites committed suicide when they shockingly found out they lost everything – all their money that sustained their families was wiped out. As we all know jews own the FRB. However, before the FRB was formed the politicians purposely delayed setting up a central bank that would prevent disasters such as the Great Depression. This was a great opportunity for the Whites to take control, but for some reason they didn’t. After the 1907’s panic attack, the FRB was formed which it reserved assets in its institution so as to not have a panic occur again. Well, as much as the jews love money they failed to keep the assets in reserve and caused the crash of the century in 1929. My, where did that money go? (hmmm – to their jewish friends across the world? Or, stuffed it in their mattresses?)

      In 1987, it has been reported that for some mysterious reason there were no reports or a hint of anything that something was about to happen just prior to the Monday’s crash. The decline essentially came out of nowhere and suddenly. (hmmmm again – Gee, what were the jews up to back then?) Oddly enough, the stocks bounced back the next day. Was this all planned? To this day no one can explain the reason why the stocks suddenly dropped. It’s all a big secret, so it seems. Yet, there is a group of people that do know. What all this boils down to, everyone, is that money is the driving factor to chaos and the people we all know too well are the drivers who cause the disasters in order to make money while putting this country in danger.

      The point to this topic is that there was big money to be made with the WTC towers and the war on Iraq. The stocks drop whenever a disaster or a war is inevitable, allowing investors to invest in stocks only to make more money. Is there a stronger connection between the disasters and the jewish stock market? Much more than you think.

      Note: If you ever run into the phrase, “the invisible hand� having to do with the economy. There is no such thing per se. However, this phrase is half true in that the people behind the economic forces are in fact illicitly behind the scenes purposely causing the economy to shift. They will even cause a war or a homeland disaster to put the forces in motion.


    11. van helsing Says:

      The evidence (physical) is always destroyed. Kennedy’s death car?