8 June, 2006

Double Shot VNN Media

Posted by alex in Geoff Beck, VNN, White media at 10:58 am | Permanent Link

Craig “Chain” Cobb interviews Steve Rowland of UK’s National Front, in London, England. Watch via the VNN Screening Room.

Direct download recommended National_Front.mp4 (97 MB): right click & save as. Requires Quicktime


Geoff Beck releases the latest installment of The Truth is No Defense, Dictatorship or Democracy?: gbttind1848k.mp3 (7 MB).

  1. Similar posts:

  2. 09/17/06 Coming Soon from VNN Broadcasting – The Good Guys! 57% similar
  3. 09/05/06 Released: FTL for Sunday, August 3rd 51% similar
  4. 08/19/06 Released: Free Talk Live Broadcasts (Vol. 1) 48% similar
  5. 09/03/06 Released: Goyfire #37 46% similar
  6. 05/16/06 Special Broadcast: VNN interviews Bill White of the NSM 45% similar
  7. 9 Responses to “Double Shot VNN Media”

    1. Craig Cobb Says:

      Nietzsche archived at marxist.org Great.

      In the meantime they are, rather, wanting and wishing, even with some importunity, to be absorbed and assimilated by and into Europe…
      Fleas like dogs too.

      …they are longing to be finally settled, permitted, respected somewhere and to put an end to the nomadic life, to the `Wandering Jew’ -;

      Let them fly to IZ.,+good+and+bad,&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1

    2. levelling of European man Says:

      At this point I won’t suppress a sigh and a final hope. What is it exactly than I find so totally unbearable? Something which I cannot deal with on my own, which makes me choke and feel faint? Bad air! Bad air! It’s when something which has failed comes close to me, when I have to smell the entrails of a failed soul! Apart from that what can we not endure by way of need, deprivation, bad weather, infirmity, hardship, loneliness? Basically we can deal with all the other things, born as we are to an underground and struggling existence. We come back again and again into the light, we live over and over our golden hour of victory—and then we stand there, just as we were born, unbreakable, tense, ready for something new, for something even more difficult, more distant, like a bow which all trouble only serves to pull more tight.

      But if there are heavenly goddesses who are our patrons, beyond good and evil, then from time to time grant me a glimpse, grant me a single glimpse into something perfect, something completely developed, something happy, powerful, triumphant, from which there is still something to fear! A glimpse of a man who justifies humanity, of a complementary and redeeming stroke-of-luck of a man, for whose sake we can hang onto a faith in humanity! . . .

      For matters stand like this: the diminution and levelling of European man hides our greatest danger, for the sight of him makes us tired. We don’t see anything today which wants to be greater. We suspect that things are constantly going down and down into something thinner, more good-natured, more prudent, more comfortable, more mediocre, more indifferent, more Chinese, more Christian—humanity, there is no doubt, is becoming constantly “better” . . . Europe’s fate lies right here. With our fear of mankind we also have lost our love for mankind, our reverence for mankind, our hopes for mankind, even our will to be mankind. A glimpse at man makes us tired—what is today’s nihilism, if it is not that? . . . We are weary of man.

    3. Olde Dutch Says:

      “Geoff”: Once upon a time there were Tammany Societies all over the United States. Tom Pendergast’s machine, probably had started out as a Tammany Society in the 19th century. Not all Tammany Societies were called by the name Tammany. Some were called by other indian names, some called Sons of Liberty, others called republican clubs with a small “r” not to be confused with today’s Republicoons & coonservatives.

      These clubs were Jeffersonian in politics, political-social in nature, and their origins seem to have been with rank & file of the Continental Army, and what was known as the “farmers & mechanics” that made up the political backbone of the American Revolution.

      Anyone could, and, still can form a Tammany “type” Society.

      Today with the computer and the copying machine even the smallest “Tammany” club, with a few bright members, could have significant impact in local and even state elections. It might not even be what you do—it might be what you might do. It could easily open the door to public and private sector jobs and positions. Next thing you know you are being taken seriously.

    4. Final Verdict Says:

      Could Alex Linder please, please say something about Shaun Walker’s arrest? The natall.com and natallnews.com site has also gone down, with its archive of valuable materials.

    5. New America Says:

      TTIND 18 makes the point that, quoting Carl Schmitt, that decisions made in the absence of democracy are, in fact, the decisions of a dictatorship.

      As we enter into The Age of the Soft Totalitarians, it is useful to note that ALL of the nonelected decisionmaking chokepoints in our society are controlled by a people who are absolutely opposed to us, and are our RACIAL enemies.

      The question logically follows, “If we ARE in a Soft Dictatorship, what can be done?”

      I think the major societal trend lines are not just opposed to us, but ACTIVELY opposed in our neutralization, today, and our negation, tomorrow.

      That’s “Our” as in “RACE.”

      What i like about Peter Shank, Alex Linder, and, yes, even – perhaps particularly – the NSM, is that we are finally developing an Awareness of The Trap, and are not allowing the Enemy to define us to his satisfaction.

      This point can not be overemphasized; for FIFTY YEARS the Goddamned Patriotards have done EXACTLY NOTHING to have any sort of effect whatsoever on the mopve by the Jewish RACE to fulfill the Jewish policy of tikkun olam – the remaking of OUR society over in THEIR image, at all levels of all institutions in our society.

      This is all the more true in the case of the Soft Totalitarians – where a Federal judiciary can ORDER the taxpayers to spend billions of dollars in support of their (VERY pro-Jewish) social experiments, knowing that he will be totally supported by the Jewish-controlled media, and the Jewish-controlled politicians; in short, an unelected Elite uses an unelected Elite to make the country over in their image.

      I suspect this is why so many White people are going slowly insane; they have been TOLD one thing – “We live in a democracy, where the majority rules through their choices at the ballot box” – when ALL of their SENSES show them something ELSE – “We live in a controlled oligrachy, where maybe 300 people really determine everything that matters, and they totally support the Jewish Agenda, which is specifically and violently anti-White and anti-Western, AND is very anti-Christian.”

      Yet, the Propasphere reinforces ONE Virtual Reality – “Jews are wonderful! Blacks are great!” – while the REAL Reality keeps trying to get him to pay attention – “These people are thieves, and liars; the other people are violent monsters who destroy everything they touch!”

      We can “vote” as a matter of Form; as a matter of Substance, if those votes don’t go the right way, our Masters will simply ignore them, and have a Federal judge overturn the election; this is hardly what the Founders had in mind.

      Yet, the Founders also wanted the country to be run by the men who owned the country; educated, aristocratic, and groomed to rule with the perspective of the long view in terms of the growth of the RACE.

      Now, it seems, we have gone full circle in the opposite direction; we have a democracy that is ruled by an unelected Elite, that hates us to an extent we could barely imagine, and uses the votes of illegals and hostile colored to destroy all our ancestors fought and died to create, and develop.

      Schmitt, describing the Weimar situatiomn from a constitutional perspective, noted that “…the crisis springs from the consequences of modern mass democracy and in the final analysis from the contradiction of a liberal individualism burdened by moral pathos and a democratic sentiment governed essentially by political ideals.”

      The pathos of our situation is obvious; the “democratic sentiment” in OUR situation does not flow organically from ONE people acting in their NATIONAL (i.e.; RACIAL) interest; rather, it is forced, inorganically, from a group that needs the Form of Union, with the Substance of Disunion to the point of RACIAL Enmity. The fact remains, the Mexicans in America are turning America into Mexico, and this choice move to a moment when it is inexorable…

      The Solution seems to be to build our own NATION, culturally, inside the American country, for now; one day, it will be OUR NATION AND OUR COUNTRY.

      New America!

      An Idea Whose Time Is Here!

    6. Olde Dutch Says:

      “Could Alex Linder please, please say something about Shaun Walker’s arrest?”

      I am not speking for the Lindermeister. But, please let me say this, if you are a journalist looking for a comment, my advice to Herr Linder is to charge an honorarium—cash money—for any comments on this matter.

      Heck “the” New York Times, and if memory serves me correctly, and a major news magazine both have solicited Linder’s opinion in the past on the cheap. Tell your boss, or client itz time to dig into his deep jew pockets, and pull out some serious cash.

      Meanwhile, in my humble opinion, the jews and their shabbos goyim would love to see Linder go away for 40 years for impersonating a “new network”.

      Added advice to Alex, if the jews try to buy you out, like, let’s say Ted Turner—don’t sell cheap!

    7. Amalekite Says:

      Craig Cobb wrote: “Nietzsche archived at marxist.org Great.

      In the meantime they are, rather, wanting and wishing, even with some importunity, to be absorbed and assimilated by and into Europe…
      Fleas like dogs too.

      …they are longing to be finally settled, permitted, respected somewhere and to put an end to the nomadic life, to the `Wandering Jew’ -;

      Let them fly to IZ.”

      Are you even capable of uttering a coherent sentence? You write like an acid casualty from the 60’s.

    8. Amalekite Says:

      Re: Geoff Beck’s “Dictatorship or Democracy?” show

      Geoff: You spend a lot of time pointing out the problems with “democracy,” but what are you proposing as the solution? A “dictatorship” isn’t really a system of government; it’s just something that happens, for better or worse, whether you like it or not. There’s nothing inherently good or bad about dictatorship; it just is, and you accept it. You have no choice.

      Some dictatorships seem to have worked relatively well, at least for a time (e.g. Hitler, Franco, Mussolini). Some have been disastrous for the people forced to live under them (e.g. Pol Pot, Mugabe). With some, it’s harder to say (e.g. Pinochet, Stalin, Chavez).

      It’s possible to argue that a few of these weren’t really dictatorships (e.g. Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Chavez).

      Many fascist movements were populist. Populism is something I associate with democratic ideals. Of course, there’s nothing that says fascism has to be dictatorial, but historically, it seems to have always been implemented that way.

      The United States is currently under a nominally democratic government. It’s clear, however, that this democratic government isn’t working in the interests of “the people.” AFAIC, communist countries have been some of the most dictatorial around, yet paradoxically, they were also the most democratic.

      “Democracy,” “dictatorship” — merely empty, hollow words. What are you advocating in practical terms?

    9. Geoff Beck Says:


      You summarized well one theme of the broadcast: that dictatorships can express popular sentiment as well or better than democracies. This is the main point to the broadcast.

      I left intentionally vague my views on the matter. I wanted the listeners to come to their own conclusions about democracy. I wanted to show them the weaknesses of democracy.

      As you know we are under 24×7 propaganda barrage which tells us that only democracy is acceptable. In rebuttal I say no! Democracy is flawed and dangerous.

      Though, I often privately think only a White racialist dictator can turn the ship around and save what remains of the White race. Only a dictator can form and mold a popular movement to challenge our foes, otherwise it is divide and conquer.

      I did not express the view explicitly in the broadcast, I wanted listeners to come to their own conclusions.