22 July, 2006

America – Israel’s Bitch

Posted by alex in jewed foreign policy, Jewish Tyranny, World War Wheeee! at 5:36 am | Permanent Link

The Shame of Being an American

by Paul Craig Roberts

Gentle reader, do you know that Israel is engaged in ethnic cleansing in southern Lebanon? Israel has ordered all the villagers to clear out. Israel then destroys their homes and murders the fleeing villagers. That way there is no one to come back and nothing to which to return, making it easier for Israel to grab the territory, just as Israel has been stealing Palestine from the Palestinians.

Do you know that one-third of the Lebanese civilians murdered by Israel’s attacks on civilian residential districts are children? That is the report from Jan Egeland, the emergency relief coordinator for the UN. He says it is impossible for help to reach the wounded and those buried in rubble, because Israeli air strikes have blown up all the bridges and roads. Considering how often (almost always) Israel misses Hezbollah targets and hits civilian ones, one might think that Israeli fire is being guided by US satellites and US military GPS. Don’t be surprised at US complicity. Why would the puppet be any less evil than the puppet master?


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 04/12/06 America Held Captive by Israel 33% similar
  3. 11/17/07 Charley Knows the Score – Cut Off Israel 32% similar
  4. 04/23/19 America Puts Crushing Oil Sanctions on Iran (for Israel’s Benefit) 32% similar
  5. 04/16/07 RITTER: Take America Back from Israel 32% similar
  6. 04/07/07 Our Only Enemy – Israel 32% similar
  7. 24 Responses to “America – Israel’s Bitch”

    1. alex Says:

      Disaster in the Making
      by Charley Reese

      You can observe three important things simultaneously in the Middle East: One, Israel’s total disregard for the lives and property of the Arab people; two, the effectiveness of the Israeli propaganda machine; and three, the utterly craven support for Israel by the U.S. government.

      A fourth thing, if you can stand to watch television news, is how casually the talking faces dispense falsehoods because of their ignorance, which is understandable. Middle East history is too complex for a fly-in TV star to avoid the trap of failing to separate fact from propaganda.

      Hezbollah, for example, raided an Israeli military outpost on what Hezbollah considers the Lebanese side of the border. Hezbollah kidnapped two soldiers. It did not fire any rockets at Israel as several television people have said – mimicking, of course, Israeli propaganda.

      Instead of sending a special-forces team or setting up negotiations for a prisoner exchange, Israel launched an all-out attack, knocking out bridges, roads, airports and fuel facilities, and doing enormous damage to civilians. Only then did Hezbollah respond with rockets, as it certainly had a right to do. Israeli journalists have pointed out that Israel has been planning for years to destroy Hezbollah and is using the raid as an excuse.

      The Israelis did the same thing in Gaza. When a handful of militants kidnapped one soldier, what did the Israelis do? They destroyed the power plant, bridges and all the government facilities in Gaza. Once again, they are using the kidnapping as an excuse to do what they had planned to do anyway – destroy Hamas and the ability of the Palestinian people to govern themselves. It takes an enormous amount of chutzpah to destroy the Palestinian government and then demand that it control the militants. “With what?” American reporters ought to be asking the Israelis.

      By the way, the Israelis never ended their occupation of Gaza. They forced settlers to withdraw because it was too much trouble to guard them. But they retained control of Gaza. Nobody can go in or out without Israeli permission. The airport is closed. They cut off the tax money that is paid by Palestinians and rightfully should have gone to the Palestinian Authority. In other words, they turned Gaza, already one of the most densely populated areas in the world, into a Middle East version of the Warsaw Ghetto. And they regularly bombed it or sprayed it with artillery.

      Yet, so effective is Israeli propaganda and so ineffective is American news coverage, Israel is once again playing the poor victim. Gee, the Israelis tell the American media, we hate to destroy Lebanon – even as their planes and artillery continue to do just that – but we can’t stand living under a rain of terrorist rockets.

      Well, obviously, they have not been. Hezbollah only fires its Katyusha rockets (a short-range, unguided missile with a 50-pound conventional warhead) in response to Israel’s violation of Lebanon’s borders, which it routinely does with its fighter planes. Even now, what Hezbollah is firing can hardly be called a “rain.” It’s more like a scattered shower. As for the “thousands” of rockets Hezbollah allegedly has, that number comes from the Israeli government. It may or may not be accurate.

      Like President Bush, the Israelis offer no evidence. Bush, who revealed himself inadvertently in St. Petersburg, Russia, as the arrogant, foul-mouthed slob he is, blames Syria and Iran for Hezbollah but offers no evidence whatsoever. If Hezbollah had thousands of rockets, you’d think it wouldn’t be so sparing in the use of them.

      One reason Lebanon never disarmed Hezbollah is because its members are considered heroes by the Lebanese Shi’ites. They were the ones who made Israel’s occupation of Lebanon so costly that the Israeli people demanded that it be ended. They also provide a wide range of welfare services to the Lebanese people, and they are not terrorists. The largest terrorist organization in the Middle East is the state of Israel, which kills civilians by the hundreds.

      What you are witnessing is a disaster in the making – not only for Lebanon, which will require 50 years to recover, but for the United States, which stands exposed once again as a prejudiced hypocrite and an accessory to Israel’s war crimes.

    2. alex Says:

      Are You an Israeli?


    3. alex Says:

      I Was Israel’s Dupe


      Alexander Cockburn writes: Twenty four years ago Ariel Sharon’s artillerymen bombarded Beirut, causing huge terrible civilian casualties, just as Israel’s bombs are doing today. The destruction was so savage that NYT’s Beirut correspondent Thomas Friedman complained bitterly in an indiscreet in-house memo when his editors axed the word “indiscriminate� which Friedman had used to describe the bombing. I published that internal memo in the Village Voice and Friedman thought he was going to lose his job. Standing next to those Israeli gunners and cheering them on were Tom Hayden and Jane Fonda, eager to promote Hayden’s political career in California. It was one of the most disgusting political spectacles of the 1980s and I wrote angrily that “in the halls of the National Gallery in Washington DC there are 54 portraits of Benedict Arnold. None look alike. All resemble Tom Hayden.� Now, amid another Israeli onslaught Hayden makes amends, with a mea culpa for that trip and an important glimpse of how what’s loosely called “the lobby� really works, when it comes to electing its chosen politicians.

      Twenty-five years ago I stared into the eyes of Michael Berman, chief operative for his congressman-brother, Howard Berman. I was a neophyte running for the California Assembly in a district that the Bermans claimed belonged to them.

      “I represent the Israeli defense forces,� Michael said. I thought he was joking. He wasn’t. Michael seemed to imagine himself the gatekeeper protecting Los Angeles’ Westside for Israel’s political interests, and those of the famous Berman-Waxman machine. Since Jews represented one-third of the Democratic district’s primary voters, Berman held a balance of power.

      All that year I tried to navigate the district’s Jewish politics. The solid historical liberalism of the Westside was a favorable factor, as was the strong support of many Jewish community leaders. But the community was moving in a more conservative direction. Some were infuriated at my sponsorship of Santa Monica’s tough rent control ordinance. Many in the organized community were suspicious of the New Left for becoming Palestinian sympathizers after the Six Day War; they would become today’s neoconservatives.

      I had traveled to Israel in a generally supportive capacity, meeting officials from all parties, studying energy projects, befriending peace advocates like the writer Amos Oz. I also met with Palestinians and commented favorably on the works of Edward Said. As a result, a Berman ally prepared an anti-Hayden dossier in an attempt to discredit my candidacy with the Democratic leadership in the California state capital.

      This led to the deli lunch with Michael Berman. He and his brother were privately leaning toward an upcoming young prosecutor named Adam Schiff, who later became the congressman from Pasadena. But they calculated that Schiff couldn’t win without name recognition, so they were considering “renting� me the Assembly seat, Berman said. But there was one condition: that I always be a “good friend of Israel.�

      This wasn’t a particular problem at the time. Since the 1970s I had favored some sort of two-state solution. I felt close to the local Jewish activists who descended from the labor movement and participated in the civil rights and anti-Vietnam movements. I wanted to take up the cause of the aging Holocaust survivors against the global insurance companies that had plundered their assets.

      While I believed the Palestinians had a right to self-determination, I didn’t share the animus of some on the American left who questioned Israel’s very legitimacy. I was more inclined toward the politics of Israel’s Peace Now and those Palestinian nationalists and human rights activists who accepted Israel’s pre-1967 borders as a reality to accommodate. I disliked the apocalyptic visions of the Israeli settlers I had met, and thought that even hard-line Palestinians would grudgingly accept a genuine peace initiative.

      I can offer my real-life experience to the present discussion about the existence and power of an “Israel lobby.� It is not as monolithic as some argue, but it is far more than just another interest group in a pluralist political world. In recognizing its diversity, distinctions must be drawn between voters and elites, between Reform and Orthodox tendencies, between the less observant and the more observant. During my ultimate 18 years in office, I received most of my Jewish support from the ranks of the liberal and less observant voters. But I also received support from conservative Jews who saw themselves as excluded by a Jewish (and Democratic) establishment.

      However, all these rank-and-file constituencies were attuned to the question of Israel, even in local and state elections, and would never vote for a candidate perceived as anti-Israel or pro-Palestinian. I had to be certified “kosher,� not once but over and over again.

      The certifiers were the elites, beginning with rabbis and heads of the multiple mainstream Jewish organizations, especially each city’s Jewish Federation. An important vetting role was held as well by the American-Israel Political Action Committee (AIPAC), a group closely associated with official parties in Israel. When necessary, Israeli ambassadors, counsels general and other officials would intervene with statements declaring someone a “friend of Israel.�

      In my case, a key to the “friendship issue� was the Los Angeles-based counsel general Benjamin Navon. Though politics drew us together, our personal friendship was genuine enough. I think that Benny, as he was called, wanted to pull me and my then-wife, Jane Fonda, into a pro-Israel stance, but he himself was an old-school labor/social democrat who personally believed in a negotiated political settlement. We enjoyed personal and intellectual time together, and I still keep on my bookshelf a wooden sculpture by his wife, of an anguished victim of violence.

      The de facto Israeli endorsement would be communicated indirectly, in compliance with laws that prohibit foreign interference in an American election. We would be seen and photographed together in public. Benny would make positive public statements that could be quoted in campaign mailings. As a result, I was being declared “kosher� by the ultimate source, the region’s representative of the state of Israel.

      Nevertheless, throughout the spring 1982 campaign I was accused of being a left-wing madman allied to terrorism and communism. The national Democratic leader Walter Mondale commented jokingly during a local visit that I was being described as worse than Lenin. It was a wild ride.

      I won the hard-fought primary by 51% to 45%. The Bermans stayed neutral. Willie Brown, Richard Alatorre and the rest of the California Democratic establishment were quietly supportive. I easily won the general election in November.

      But that summer I made the mistake of my political career. The Israel Defense Forces invaded Lebanon, and Benny Navon wanted Jane and me to be supportive. It happened that I had visited the contested border in the past, witnessed the shelling of civilian Israeli homes, and interviewed Israeli and Lebanese zealots—crazies, I thought, who were preaching preventive war. I opposed cross-border rocket attacks and naively favored a demilitarized zone.

      Ever curious, and aware of my district’s politics, I decided we should go to the Middle East—but only as long as the Israeli “incursion,� as it was delicately called, was limited to the 10-kilometer space near the Lebanese border, as a cushion against rocket fire. Benny Navon assured me that the “incursion� was limited, and would be followed by negotiations and a solution. I also made clear our opposition to the use of any fragmentation bombs in the area, and my ultimate political identification with what Israeli Peace Now would say.

      There followed a descent into moral ambiguity and realpolitick that still haunts me today. When we arrived at the Israeli-Lebanon border, the game plan promised by Benny Navon had changed utterly. Instead of a localized border conflict, Israel was invading and occupying all of Lebanon—with us in tow. Its purpose was to destroy militarily the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) haven in Lebanon. This had been Gen. Ariel Sharon’s secret plan all along, and I never will know with certainty whether Benny Navon had been deceived along with everyone else.

      For the next few weeks, I found myself defending Israel’s “right� to self-defense on its border, only to realize privately how foolish I was becoming. In the meantime, Israel’s invasion was continuing, with ardent Jewish support in America.

      Finally, a close friend and political advisor of mine, Ralph Brave, took me for a walk, looked into my eyes and said: “Tom, you can’t do this. You have to stop.� He was right, and I did. In the California Legislature, I went to work on Holocaust survivor issues while withdrawing from the bind of Israeli-Palestinian politics. When the first Palestinian intifada began, I sensed from experience that the balance of forces had changed, and that the Israeli occupation was finished. Frictions developed between me and some of my Israeli and Jewish friends when I suggested that Israel must make a peace deal immediately or accept a worse deal later.

      It is still painful and embarrassing to describe these events of nearly 25 years ago, but with Israel today again bombing Lebanon and Israeli officials bragging about “rolling back the clock by twenty years� and reconfiguring the Middle East, I feel obliged to speak out against history repeating.

      How do I read today’s news through the lens of the past?

      What I fear is that the “Israeli lobby� is working overtime to influence American public opinion on behalf of Israel’s military effort to “roll back the clock� and “change the map� of the region, going far beyond issues like prisoner exchange.

      What I fear is that the progress of the American peace movement against the Iraq war will be diverted and undermined, at least for now, by the entry of Israel from the sidelines into the center of the equation.

      What I fear is the rehabilitation of the discredited U.S. neoconservative agenda to ignite a larger war against Hamas, Hezbollah, Syria and Iran. The neoconservatives’ 1996 “Clean Break� memo advocated that Israel “roll back� Lebanon and destabilize Syria in addition to overthrowing Saddam Hussein. An intellectual dean of the neoconservatives, Bernard Lewis, has long advocated the “Lebanonization� of the Middle East, meaning the disintegration of nation states into “a chaos of squabbling, feuding, fighting sects, tribes, regions and parties.�

      This divide-and-conquer strategy, a brainchild of the region’s British colonizers, is already taking effect in Iraq, where America overthrew a secular state, installed a Shiite majority and its militias in power and now portrays itself as the only protection for Sunnis against those same Shiites. The resulting quagmire has become a justification for American troops to remain.

      What I fear is trepidation and confusion among rank-and-file voters and activists, and the paralysis of politicians, especially Democrats, who last week were moving gradually toward setting a deadline for U.S. withdrawal from Iraq. The politics of the present crisis favor the Republicans and the White House in the short run. How many politicians will favor withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq under present conditions? Isn’t this Karl Rove’s game plan for the November elections?

      What I know is that I will not make the same mistake again. I hope that my story deepens the resolve of all those whose feelings are torn, conflicted or confused in the present. It is not being a “friend of Israel� to turn a blind eye to its never-ending occupation.

      One might argue, and many Americans today might agree, that Hezbollah and Hamas started this round of war with their provocative kidnappings of Israeli soldiers. Lost in the headlines, however, is the fact that the Israelis have 9,000 Palestinian prisoners, and have negotiated prisoner swaps before. Others will blame the Islamists for incessant rocket attacks on Israel. But the roots of this virulent spiral of vengeance lie in the permanent occupation of Palestinian territories by the overconfident Israelis. As it did in 1982, Israel now admits that the war is not about prisoner exchanges or cease-fires; it is about eradicating Hezbollah and Hamas altogether, if necessary by an escalation against Syria or even Iran. It should be clear by now that the present Israeli government will never accept an independent Palestinian state, but rather harbors a colonial ambition to decide which Palestinian leaders are acceptable.

      In 1982, Israel said the same thing about eliminating PLO sanctuaries in Lebanon. It was after that 1982 Israeli invasion that Hezbollah was born. I remember Israeli national security experts even taking credit for fostering Hamas and Islamic fundamentalism as safe, reclusive alternatives to Palestinian secular nationalism. I remember watching Israeli soldiers blow up Palestinian houses and carry out collective punishment because, they told me matter-of-factly, punishment is the only language that Arabs understand. Israelis are inflicting collective punishment on Lebanese civilians for the same reason today.

      It is clear that apocalyptic forces, openly green-lighted by President Bush, are gambling on the impossible. They are trying to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat in Iraq through escalation in Lebanon and beyond. This is yet another faith-based initiative.

      If the American people do not see through the headlines; if the Democrats turn hawkish; if the international community fails to intervene immediately, the peace movement may be sidelined to a prophetic and marginal role for the moment. But we can say the following for now:

      Militarism and occupation cannot extinguish the force of Islamic nationalism. Billions in American tax dollars are funding the Israeli troops and bombs.

      There needs to be an exit strategy. The absence of any such exit plan is the weakest element of the U.S.-Israeli campaign. Just as the White House says it plans to deploy 50,000 troops on permanent bases in an occupied Iraq, so the Israelis speak of permanently eliminating their enemies, from Gaza to Tehran. The result will be further occupation, resistance and deeper quagmire.

      The immediate conflict should not become a pretext for continuing the U.S. military occupation of Iraq. American soldiers should not be stuck waist-deep in a sectarian quagmire. Congressional insistence on denying funds for permanent military bases is a vital first step. Otherwise we will witness a tacit alliance between Israel and the U.S. to dominate the Middle East militarily.

      Most important, Americans must not be timid in speaking up, as I was 25 years ago. Silence is consent to occupation.

      This article first appeared June 18 on the truthdig site, edited by Robert Scheer.

    4. Lutjens Says:

      “Are You an Israeli?


      No I am not.

    5. David Prospero Says:

      Tom Hayden is a scum bucket. I hope his death is slow, miserable and wracked with pain. And when death finally draws near in his tortured body, divine intervention occurs and takes this fucker on another pain racked torturous journey so when he experiences rebirth as a maggot, he is given the power of reason and memory so he can savor the moment.
      No Alex, I ain’t a jew..but to beat em you’ve gotta think like em!

    6. SHMUELY Says:

      It`s almost amazing, gasp, that Paul Craig Roberts actually wrote that blistering article without his usual “brown shirt” wisecracks. Could he be sobering-up ?

    7. Will Says:

      Haven’t seen one comparison or reference to Hitler and his Hateful Nation yet. On the lookout.

      I don’t mean to sound like Spicoli but ISRAEL IS A MAJOR FUCKIN’ DRAG MAN.

    8. silverstein wtc7 Says:

      after reading some of that national review article, i became physically sick; literally. my stomach is not well right now thanks to that article.

    9. Shame on Hal Says:

      hal turner is talking about this subject over on his site.
      as usual, he’s trying to convince some poor sucker to carry out violence that would do nothing but harm to the WN movement.
      plus, he said on his show that he had sources telling him that tel aviv was gonna get 500 missiles rained down on it.
      as usual, hal’s just a bag of hot air, as far as i’m concerned.

    10. Johnny the Jew Says:

      Do you realize that northern Israel was bombarded with rockets? Or is that another “holohoax”? And do you know what “self-defense” and “collateral damage” means? Of course you do. You just don’t want Israel to exist.

      If I were head of Israel, I would insist on the existence of a no-man’s-land that surrounds Eretz Yisroel, and it would be so big that rocket attacks like the ones that took place in northern Israel can’t happen. I say evacuate the perimeter of Israel, and evict the Arabs from that land at once … not because all of the Arabs that live there are terrorists, but because it is the only way to protect Israel from the terrorists. That is the solution to the problem of Muslim terrorism in Israel.

      May Israel defend itself to the best of its ability without caring what libertarian peacenicks like Paul Craig Roberts think about it!

    11. Shame on Hal Says:

      yeah, but hal said tel aviv was gonna get 500 missiles thrown at it.
      it never happened.
      if it did, or does, let me know.
      othewise, you can call me a “tel aviv holocaust” denier, ok?

    12. asd Says:

      Funny how most of the ‘peaceniks’ in the 60’s were either jews, or jew organized when the war was against communist vietnam. For some reason the peace movement isnt a media darling this time. I suppose peace is just unpopular these days. How do we thank the jews for taking over and wrecking our countries????? I often hear the arabs talk of driving israel into the sea for taking over palestine, and the palestinians apparently have been allowed to keep their ethnic identity. We whites have been stripped of our identity and had our nations turned into international whore houses, syphoned of wealth and made economically and culturally desolate, all at the behest of jew agitators and their lackey’s. For this what do we owe Israel?

    13. Johnny the Jew Says:

      The Jews didn’t wreck the country. That’s hyperbole. For my response to your comments, see my comments on the poem.

    14. Coup d'Etat Says:

      The article explains well the conflicting thoughts the jews have. Bottom line, they don’t make sense, but only the sense of committing cold-blooded murder. The U.S. has been seized by the higher powers. The powers may be higher as far as the regular citizens not being able to rebel against these criminals, unless a seizure of the WH is in order (if that would work), but the powers are not great as in being the noblest — far from it. We have a nation full of cold-blooded criminals in our higher government and the rabid dogs have very much revealed themselves. We need names on AIPAC members plastered all over the internet. We need names of those in the House of Representatives plastered all over the internet and anyone else who sides with the jewish state of criminals. They are to be posted on the internet as criminals and terrorists, killing innocent civilians for their own pride and greed. Will these criminals then feel ashamed? Probably not. It’s going to take great strength and power to overcome the unrelentless, rabid dogs and put them out of their misery.

    15. Coup d'Etat Says:

      You are a liar, Johnny the criminal jew. All jews are criminals and they all start shit so that non-jews won’t kill you. You people are nothing but a bunch of paranoid, schizophrenic, cold-blooded murders who have up to this point have gotten away with every grave misdeed you ever started. If you didn’t have the U.S.’s support at all, all of you would have been dead years ago, and we wouldn’t have to put up with your crap and your persistant lying about your innocence.

    16. jimbo Says:

      Johnneeee the yoo sez:

      ‘Do you realise that northern Israel was bombarded with rockets?
      would those be the WWII-era Katyushas having ranges of less than 20klmtrs(nearest Yidsraeli town: 30klmtrs) & that need to be fired from the backs of specially-rigged trucks?(which can’t negotiate the mountainous terrain of sthrn Lebanon)
      so who’s bombarding who jew-boy?
      i detect (yet) another MOSSAD ‘false flag’ psy-op here!

      ‘Or is that another “holohoaxâ€??’

      it’s certainly ‘a hoax’
      yet again: being perped by the jews-media.

      And do you know what “self-defenceâ€? and “collateral damageâ€? means?’

      yeh….’self defence’ is where the yoos commit genocide against the goys, right jew-boy?
      and: ‘collateral damage’ is where any-thing that stands in the way of this noble objective gets accidentally on purpose ‘wasted’ in the process.
      am i right jew-boy? hunh? am i right or am i RIGHT?

      Of course you do. You just don’t want Israel to exist’

      no….we just don’t want jews to exist, period!

    17. James Woroble Jr. Says:

      America is the JEWZ bitch! Israel is directly controlled by the globalist financial kike kabal mainly centered in New York City and London.


      July 18, 2006

      United States Special Forces Seize Control Of Israeli Nuclear Weapons Complex

      By: Sorcha Faal

      Russian Military Analysts, and FSB sources, are reporting today that United States Military Special Forces have seized control of the nation of Israel’s nuclear complex located at Dimona with a contingent of their Special Forces Troops from the American war zone currently located in Iraq.

      These reports detail that this action by the American Military Leadership was in direct response to China’s President Hu’s ‘threat to the American President that should the Straight of Hormoz be blockaded by Iran, due to the escalating crisis between Israel and its Muslim neighbors, China would consider that action as a ‘declaration of war’ against the Chinese people.

      The America response to this ‘threat’ from China, coming from China’s President Hu in his ‘face-to-face’ meeting with the United States President Bush at the G-8 Summit, was to assure both China’s President Hu, and Russia’s President Putin, that the American Military Leadership would ‘secure’ Israel’s nuclear weapons and limit their, Israel’s, incursion into Lebanon.

      In return for the American Military Leadership’s securing Israel’s nuclear weapons both President Putin and President Hu have allowed a ’72-hour-window’ for Israel to secure its Northern Border with Lebanon, with the ‘understanding’ that Israel will not attack either Syria or Iran, and whom Israel has blamed for being the instigators behind this current war.

      These reports further detail that the American President has dispatched his Secretary of State to report to Israel’s Prime Minister Olmert the full details of this agreement, but which these reports state that the government of Israel is in ‘violent’ opposition to.
      We expect another update within the next 24 hours on these issue, and which we will report to you once received.

      © July 18, 2006 EU and US all rights reserved.

      [Ed. Note: The United States government actively seeks to find, and silence, any and all opinions about the United States except those coming from authorized government and/or affiliated sources, of which we are not one. No interviews are granted and very little personal information is given about our contributors to protect their safety.]


    18. Bullshit Detector Says:

      that story sounds like BULLSHIT. prove me wrong.

    19. jimbo Says:

      re: Bullshit Detector

      the proof of the puddin’ will be in the dumplins’ as they say.
      Yidsrael w/out KIKE-SA backing is a paper tiger
      ANd no way will the JewSA enter an un-winnable war with Russia or China….ZOG knows that would spell their doom!

      “In return for the American Military Leadership’s securing Israel’s nuclear weapons both President Putin and President Hu have allowed a ’72-hour-window’ for Israel to secure its Northern Border with Lebanon, with the ‘understanding’ that Israel will not attack either Syria or Iran and whom Israel has blamed for being the instigators behind this current war”

      seeing wot Yidsrael does or doesn’t do over the next coupla days will be the acid test, IMHO.

    20. James Woroble Jr. Says:

      So far the puddin’ is 24 hours cold. Another 48 and it can be fed to the dogs.

      The key element here will be if Isntrael invades Lebanon in force with ground troops as planed a year ago, which is the only way to secure the mission.

      Regarding the presumption that the kikez are entirely rational and would not enter an un-winnable war with Russia and China, I suggest that to better understand the psyche of the eternal jew that one familiarize themselves with the Sampson myth to comprehend itz immense social and cultural influence upon the spawn of Satan.

    21. James Woroble Jr. Says:

      “Forgive him, for he believes that the customs of his tribe are the laws of nature!”

      -George Bernard Shaw

    22. jimbo Says:

      re: James W
      ‘Regarding the presumption that the kikez are entirely rational and would not enter an un-winnable war with Russia and China, I suggest that to better understand the psyche of the eternal jew that one familiarize themselves with the Sampson myth to comprehend itz immense social and cultural influence upon the spawn of Satan’

      i think WNs are in a ‘win-win’ situation here: if the kikes do invade, then the mountainous sthrn region of Lebanon presents numerous, interesting pssblts for a determined and well-equipped guerilla force(even one equipped with only ‘light arms’ no bigger than ‘recoil-less rifles’).

      Yidsrael’s ZOG-SA supplied Abrams’ tanks and APCs will be of little or no use there & it is well known that air-power (even Apache gun-ships) are also of little or no use in rugged, mountainous terrain (viz: FRY)

      As such, we can anticipate even greater atrocities & outrages against the civilian ppltns of Lebanon &c as the kikes realise they can’t force a military solution.

      Naturally: that will turn the rest of the world (except for totally ‘ZOG’-ised locales like the JewSA!) even more against these filthy, worthless scum than they already are.

      Assuming the yoos escalate to ‘Samson’ status, the Russians & Chinese have enough conventional fire-power to obliterate these Talmudic FUCKS.
      A bevy of Sun-Burn and/or Super-Sun-Burn missiles, for instance, launched against ground and naval targets would soon dampen the enthuaism of these hob-goblins for mass slaughter! and would also dis-courage their Talmudic dog-fuck cuzzes….the JewSA….from further shenanigans.

      A couple of carriers @ the bottom of the Persian Gulf or the Red Sea would, more likely than not, chuck a cold blanket on ZOG’s military eagnerness & have Bullshit’s pet chimpanzee, Cunt-Head Ripe frantically jetting around the globe again in a vain effort @ ‘shuttle diplomacy’ or some such.

      AFA, ‘non-conventional’ responses are concerned, one Typhoon sub’ in the Black Sea has enough fire-power on-board to vaporise the entire Middle-East! If the Jew_SA decides to step up to the plate too, then let’s see how the average fucked-up schmuck there likes the business end of multiple ICBM strikes all for the sake of the FCKN KIKEs.

      As Dr Pierce said long ago, ‘once their refrigerators are empty, their JooTubes are blank and the SUV is stuck in the drive-way because of empty bowsers, then they will be ready to here alternative view-points’

      OTOH: if the yoos comply with this 72-hr dead-line, they will be exposed to all the world as the paper tigers that they actually are!
      THe mighty IDF, chock-a-block with Jew-SA military hard-ware, can’t beat a small, rag-tag army of sand niggz and have to resort to dropping cluster bombs and napalm on help-less women & children. BRAVO! yoos

      NO JEWS…..JUST RIGHT!: an idea whose time has COME!

    23. JHD Says:

      Anybody notice how that butcher sharon just will not die. We moslems have long known that you are accountable for all deeds in the afterlife. This fat jew pig will not shuffle off the mortal coil becuase he knows what awaits him there. In fact the life of this world is all the jew gets. in the next world only punishment, where they are made to swallow molten copper for the practise of usuary. Hitler says in Mein Kampf that they all pretend to “hate” zionsim, and he soon tired of their hypocrisy. I say the only good jew is a dead one. You americans must struggle to rid your country of this menace to mankind. You must liberate your sons and daughters from the hebrew bondage and cut the throats of these parasites wherever you find them. To find them, simply look for brothels, casino’s and tv stations. Where there is immorality, there you shall find the jew. and do not look upon them with mercy, for here is truly a viper of the first order. Do what you must to rid yourselves of this disease, and curse your forefathers for allowing them into america. And I hope it is not too much to ask, but please can you impeach that moron of a president you have. I think that a post op labotomised chimpansee could do a better job of running america. Plus, of corse the chimp will be better looking. This president you have has narrow eyes like a pig, and he rapes the english language everytime he opens his mouth. Please folks, get rid of him. He is a puss filled vagina.

      I wish strength, luck and victory to all americans like you. You guys can think, and most importantly you refuse to accept the kike reality.

    24. » Blog Archive » … to tackling the real threats of international Says:

      […] Vanguard News Network ” Blog Archive ” America – Israel’s Bitch … this threat _ from China, coming from China _ s President Hu in his face … jewish terrorists & terrorism (2) Jewish Tribal Review (2) Jewish … […]