10 August, 2006

Kaminski: Can a Jew Tell the Truth?

Posted by alex in jewish hate & hypocrisy, John Kaminski at 4:07 pm | Permanent Link

CHALLENGE TO A DEBATE

Can a Jew tell the truth?

Israeli terror, Zionist corruption, pornographic media, poison drugs, bad doctors, robot lawyers, phony schools, pervert rabbis: the Hebrew/Ashkenazi legacy seems all about robbers and killers and lack of conscience

By John Kaminski
[email protected]

During the reign of the Ottoman Empire, Jews were forbidden to practice medicine because it was believed they only became doctors as a more efficient way of killing gentile cattle. Any resemblance to modern medicine is not purely coincidental.

I challenge Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, Amy Goodman, William Blum and all those other Jewish poseurs who label themselves “progressives” to a debate about their perfidy and their hidden allegiance. These and so many other bright but deceptive media lights like William Rivers Pitt or Paul Craig Roberts — or the Arch Shabbez Goi Alex Jones — may wish to explain why they are razor sharp about the wanton excesses of America and the United States, yet conspicuously fail to identify the Jewish links that cause all these serial disasters: actions by banks, media, medicine, education, entertainment, which are all meticulously assembled like a devil’s symphony to destroy the societies on which they are imposed. The immigration issue is also about that, part of the long term Jewish strategy to destroy and plunder the United States and the rest of the world.

I challenge these pop culture icons to talk about Jewish schools that teach fealty to the insane notion that one group of people is so vastly superior to all the others that they have the right to rob and kill those they call lesser animals. While they act progressive, their basic motivation remains the same as any sociopathic, narcissistic killer. All that counts is what you can take, or how you can get off. And the secrets you keep that make you do it.

The secret that Israel keeps inflicting on the world — through subterfuge, media indoctrination, bribery, blackmail and mass murder — is that the problem is someone else’s: America’s, Britain’s, Germany’s, Russia’s, Rome’s …. when the real deal is that all these societies were surreptitiously destabilized for profit. The new style of destabilization for profit is what we now see in Gaza, Lebanon, Iraq … and anywhere the worldwide Jewish financial octopus decides to clamp its toxic tentacles.

Israel is a false flag, a crime syndicate, not a nation. Judaism is a false religion, really a crime scheme, only for Jews, not for anyone else, because anyone else is, according to Jews, cattle.

This is the precise insanity that is destroying the world, and you and I support it in significant ways. But Jews abet it, operate it, ever devise new ways to fleece the goyim, from putting porn stars on the covers of young girl how-to magazines, to manuscripts of the highest order being slightly changed to benefit a certain tribe in perpetuity. Can you say Scofield Bible?

From shooting little children in the head and calling it fighting terrorism. This is part of the most evil Jewish media spin of all time. What people should be saying is: Jewish terrorists, Palestinian freedom fighters.

How do you feel about that, Mr. Chomsky?

Or how about this question from my friends in Queensland?

Haifa Attacks Are More Propaganda

As fear grips the town of Haifa, it is now confirmed that Hezzbolah has pulled out the fearsome Fajr-5s. These are big, fairly sophisticated, use a tractor truck as a launch platform, and carry massive war heads.

Once again these Israelis stories are total nonsense. These missile platforms, which are said to be located in Tyre would be spotted in minutes. The type of damage from the shells hitting Haifa, are mortars at best.

Fifty bucks says there is a Israeli mortar team outside of Haifa lobbing shells, so Israel can garner world sympathy.

You’re so eloquent about America’s depredations, so silent about the significance of Israel, which you call “just another country.” Please discourse on your statement that Israel had nothing to do with 9/11. Then we’ll listen with hearty but feigned amazement at the derisive laughter from an unamused world that rains down on your bogus analysis.

And you, Ms. Goodman, icon of the gatekeeper airwaves: Why was it you would never talk about 9/11? For three years, wasn’t it? Now that it has gained some modest share of the media market, you feel free to mention it every now and then, but you much prefer to stay focused on Haiti, Darfur, Bolivia or anywhere else that is as far away from Israel as you can get.

As you failed to focus on 9/11 as the central phenomenon in world politics, isn’t your mission to keep people distracted with wrenching testimony to keep them from noticing the one evil tribe that has completely taken over Western society? Or is it, like all those other “naive” Jewish writers who insist we’re all in this together, that you just never noticed how many aspects of human society Jewish strategy has totally infused with its scatological, sadomasochistic undertones …. all geared to assist in the destabilization of the existing society.

Would any one of you — Chomsky, Goodman, Zinn, Blum, Pitt or Jones — care to comment about the overall strategy of the Jewish community is to control the world, and that it has already happened, and that your work merely perpetuates it?

I was brought up to believe that the worst thing you could ever call anyone was a Nazi. Much later in life I learned that it was the Western powers — England and the U.S. — who really started World War II, but even way back then, it wasn’t really them: it was the power of Jewish bankers, executed by Bernard Baruch and Felix Frankfurter (today’s comparison would be Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz), who not only created Roosevelt, but who started WW II, for the purpose of destroying Germany’s economic success, and creating Israel.

Israel. The crime syndicate of the Illuminati. Except that the Illuminati is wholly Jewish, started by a Jew turned Catholic, operated by the Jews who control the money. Now used as a convenient myth by Jewish writers to say the problems is not really Jewish.

In a similar vein, see Professor Kevin MacDonald’s “Neoconservatism as a Jewish movement.” It’s run by Jews, posing as something else. Stop kidding yourself that any other other label will suffice. Don’t be deceived by the media spin. The media are Jewish.

Now, in the year 2006, throughout the world, Nazi is no longer the most insulting epithet one can hurl: it has been overtaken in popularity by the word American. Yanqui dog. Sure, Israeli is an even more ominous insult. Because Israelis enjoy killing children, lending a vivid bloody credence to the horrid legends that rabbis murder and drink the blood of gentile children.

Thus, as American soldiers rape children in Iraq and Israel foists its false flag terror on unarmed people, this reputation has overspread Britain and the United States. You can’t trust any of them. Remember, the U.S. made 103 official treaties with its own native population, and never kept one of them. This is the lesson the rest of the world must learn, and learn quickly, before the last glint of human freedom is irretrievably lost to “the man’s” machining of the human mind.

“The man” is insane, he’s a banker, and he’s Jewish.

Venezuela’s charismatic president Hugo Chavez nailed it:

The world has an offer for everybody but it turned out that a few minorities — the descendants of those who crucified Christ …. took possession of the riches of the world, a minority took possession of the planet’s gold, the silver, the minerals, the water, the good lands, the oil, and they have concentrated all the riches in the hands of a few; less than 10 percent of the world population owns more than half of the riches of the world.

But the more relevant quote was uttered by venerated, supposedly immortal Lubavitcher Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, who died in 1994:

… the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world…A non-Jew’s entire reality is only vanity. It is written, ‘And the strangers shall guard and feed your flocks’ (Isaiah 61:5). The entire creation [of a non-Jew] exists only for the sake of the Jews…”

There you have it. Can a Jew tell the truth? The answer would have to be “No!”

Only a human being can tell the truth, and since according to their holy books and statements of their leaders, Jews consider human beings to be “dogs,” “cattle” and “cockroaches,” they can’t possibly tell the truth.

Now the key question: What do humans do about this knowledge?

Maybe Larry Silverstein, the man who leased the World Trade Centers and, a few months later, made billions. Or perhaps Rabbi Dov Zakheim? The man who coordinated the Pentagon budget just before Rumsfeld announced $2.3 trillion was missing. That announcement was made the day before 9/11/2001. Zakheim, who also headed the Bush government’s remote-controlled Unmanned Aerial Vehicle program development, moved to Israel shortly after Rumsfeld’s announcement, and the chaos of the days that followed.

Perhaps some Jewish person could tell you the truth about all this? What do you think?

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida whose Internet essays are now banned by most gatekeeper media. His latest collection of essays, “Recipe for Extinction,” is available at http://www.johnkaminski.com/


  • 21 Responses to “Kaminski: Can a Jew Tell the Truth?”

    1. Hans Schneider Says:

      Very excellent article by a very bright, courageous and focussed writer.

    2. E Says:

      Kaminski is a genius

    3. Carpenter Says:

      A good essay. I’ll look through his website. It says in the margin that it is part of “a new journalism apparatus that will one day replace the corrupt corporate spin machine.” I believe the internet has more and more of an impact all the time. If bloggers can defeat an Inner Party candidate like Joe Lieberman and have him replaced, then we are once again reminded of its power. Nationalist websites do have an impact! It may be slow, but it’s there.

      The only thing in Kaminski’s essay I don’t agree with: “Remember, the U.S. made 103 official treaties with its own native population, and never kept one of them.” Actually, first, the Indians were not “native” to the United States, as the United States didn’t exist before it was created. Plants and dirt are not a nation, and neither are savages who have never heard of that nation. Second, Whites conquering land from non-Whites is good. Let us do away with the Christian notion that conquest in itself is evil – so says only the powerless slave/servant who will always be on the receiving end of every blow. No, conquest by a beautiful, intelligent race is good. Conquest by an ugly, destructive race is bad.

      But that is a minor point. Good piece, I didn’t know that about Dov Zakheim. What would America be without Jews? It would be America.

    4. Sehnsucht nach dem Reich Says:

      Great essay, Kaminski gets better and better.

    5. Mark Says:

      Another good question: Can a Jew be a White nationalist?

      Jared Taylor is caught between a Gefilte fish and a hard place!

      http://splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=644

    6. WhiteFight Says:

      Good article but listen my friends; it is becoming almost hip to attack the jews (which is good I guess). The problem I can see on the horizon is that these same people will absolutely attack you is you promote the idea of white living space. Just getting rid of the jew is not enough and I feel many of us can’t see beyond the kosher question. Someone should email Kamenski and ask him what his thoughts are regarding white living space. I can almost say for certain he would be opposed to the idea. I used to think Michael Piper on RBN was a great reporter. He has effectively named the jew in the killing of Kennedy and solved many other myseries which have baffled researchers for decades but, I have noticed a steadily increasing anti-white sentiment growing in his broadcasting which caused me to stop listening altogether. One thing he said (which I believe is typical amongst many anti-israeli reporters) is that it’s wrong for white nationalists to want to get arabs out of white living space. Are we supposed to welcome arabs into our countries because they are fighting jews? No, we must stay focused my friends. Sure, we should somewhat support people who are exposing the jews but I fear these are the same people we may have to fight someday to claim lands of our own. Believe me, many of these people who expose Israel want the brown hordes to continue to invade white lands…

    7. WhiteFight Says:

      I’d like to add that I reccomend everyone listen to the latest Hawtorne report, particularly starting from the time 23:19: “When we are in the city and robbing we are waging war; waging a war against the Swedes. Power for me means that the Swedes shall look at me, lie down on the ground and kiss my feet.” This is a quote from a Muslim living in Sweden. We in America don’t have as many Muslims her but I was in Europe and I saw how they took over neighborhoods. It was dangerous, as a white, walking down many a European street which was overcome with arabs. I would say that generally speaking they hate whitey just as much as they hate the jews. But, when they are living/invading white lands, I think they hate whitey more…

    8. Lopsided Says:

      The U.S. supplies Israel.

      Iran supplies Hezbollah.

      …and this is unfair to Israel.
      .
      .
      No?

    9. Carpenter Says:

      Arabs will move into Western lands when the door is open, like all the rest. And they will quickly form gangs, do drugs and imitate gangsta nigs when they lose their traditional culture – yes, they should be thrown out. The difference between them and Jews is that they won’t spend time hating Whitey when in their own lands. They move to greener pastures because that’s the natural thing to do. (And it is unconnected to the struggle waged by al-Qaeda and other groups, a distinction that is always important to remember. Many European nationalist parties fail to be that nuanced, and act as if all Arabs, immigrants and nationalists, are connected to each other.)

      We should always remember what happened when Jorg Haider’s party entered the government in Austria in 2000; Israel pulled out its embassy and lobbied for the EU nations to completely isolate Austria politically, which they did. No Arab nation pulled out its embassy. The only Middle Eastern government that condemns Western nationalism is Israel, the others don’t give it any thought.

    10. alex Says:

      Collins Piper’s grandfather was an Indian, he says. He’s no WN. But he has given us a key piece of information – the truth about Meyer Lansky and the global jewish mafia arranging the murder of JFK. This information can be used to win marginal Irish Catholics to our cause.

    11. Sehnsucht nach dem Reich Says:

      I don’t have to exchange emails with Kaminski to figure out whether he is one of us, that is someone, who roots with the white race unconditionally. He is certainly not one of us in this sense.

      When Kaminski targets the flaws of the victims of the Jews, and there are certainly big flaws, on which the Jews capitalize, he seems only to see the White race. Even when he doesn’t make it specific, you sense, that the White middle-class is the target, a very big target indeed, one can hardly miss. He never discusses the flaws of the other races, which are in my opinion even more obvious. And he certainly never suggests that the White race is the only race, which has the potential to build a decent civilisation if the Jewish suppression of the rest of mankind would find an end. Kaminski is also very pessimistic. So he is more a modern Cassandra and no political activist. On the upside, he never smears Hitler, the Nazis and the Germans in a cheap way as Ed Steele often does, who seems to be one of us. Kaminski is certainly a much better writer than Steele. And since he became really out frank in naming the Jews some months ago he became one of my favourite writers.

      Kaminski has certainly a broad intellectual horizon. Although I don’t think that Kaminski is always right, he seems to be genuine. Kaminski describes the power structure we live in and the various fronts which attack the average citizen, some of these fronts are never mentioned here on the main page but on the forum, e.g. Jew-made AIDS, chemtrails etc. I certainly can understand, why Alex doesn’t want to delve in some of these subjects. It would make VNN a bit kooky for most of the people, since the Jews and their disinfo-agents try to give conspiracy theories a bad name and sometimes it is hard to distinguish between genuine research, plain paranoia and a disinformation of our enemies. But Kaminski seems to be one of the few courageous, intelligent and honest writers out there.

    12. Mike Says:

      I dunno much about Irish Catholix, given, yet I can hardly believe, that a nation of born fighteres, that they are, can identify with a family of any surname, that has let it`s best and brightest to b murdered and walked away without extracting revenge…

    13. Amerikwan Injun Says:

      LIKE I SAID:

      so the fuck what if piper is 1/4 injun????

      his 1/4 injun-ness didn’t get in the way of his finding the truth about the jfk assissanination, did it?

    14. Scipio Americanus Says:

      Carpenter Says: “The only thing in Kaminski’s essay I don’t agree with: “Remember, the U.S. made 103 official treaties with its own native population, and never kept one of them.” Actually, first, the Indians were not “native” to the United States, as the United States didn’t exist before it was created. Plants and dirt are not a nation, and neither are savages who have never heard of that nation. Second, Whites conquering land from non-Whites is good. Let us do away with the Christian notion that conquest in itself is evil – so says only the powerless slave/servant who will always be on the receiving end of every blow. No, conquest by a beautiful, intelligent race is good. Conquest by an ugly, destructive race is bad.”

      Carpenter, I couldn’t have said it better myself! Nicely stated! I’m glad there are still some MEN around here to say it as it is. As Westerners, we should never apologize for developing what is objectively the greatest Civilization known to man. We did not steal this land from the savages….we CONQUERED it with blood, sweat and tears! I am so sick of the post modern Judeo-Liberal-Christian guilt bullshit that is peddled by even the better writers such as John Kaminski. Honestly, it is weak, effete and feminine to the hilt! It is just one example of the collapse of the masculine spirit that we must somehow rekindle if the West is survive. Strength and Honor!!!!

    15. jimbo Says:

      re: vrs people ‘criticising’ Kaminski

      i know nothing of this character’s origins…whether he’s a jew or not?!
      he claims to hv been harrassed by MOSSAD agents.
      who knows?
      how-ever, isn’t the point that the truth, especially these days, is not a monolithic static oracle that can be consulted when-ever simply journeying to Point ‘X’?
      rather: it is a viscous fluid constantly in motion and constantly ‘tele-porting’ it-self to various locations…..thus: to ‘pin it down’ one must engage in a sifting/smorgasboard-like process…..selecting likely portions from various locations until a reasonable facsimile of the actual article is cloned!
      as such: it matters little what some-one’s genetic origins are(as long as serious truth-seekers are aware of possible mis-information due to such!)
      thus, the standing of a particular source should surely be:
      how MUCH of the truth does that source impart?
      as such, shouldn’t Kaminski rate highly?
      shouldn’t alert & aware WNs be capable of jettisoning the few bits of ZOG-speak that might appear in a purportedly reliable source but one which, in fact, has ulterior motives?
      similarly, Alex Jones could also be said to have a reasonable rating but possibly with similar caveats.
      and so could some-one like that Sorcha Faal who, despite having a some-what dis-tasteful anti-Nazi bias, clearly focusses on issues that would not OTW see the light of day!

      perhaps a rating system some-what similar to the following should be part of WNs’ interpretive frame-work?…….
      *totally reliable;*
      *usually reliable but with some reservations;*
      *mostly reliable but treat with caution none-the-less!*
      *½-way reliable: sift carefully!*
      *rarely reliable: occasional tit-bits of truth appear however!*
      *un-reliable: cannot really be trusted to any significant degree except perhaps as ‘confirmation’ of what is already known or suspected!*
      *out-right LIES!…..100-proof ZOG propaganda!*

    16. Shabbos Shabazz Says:

      *out-right LIES!…..100-proof ZOG propaganda!*

      You mean 200 proof? (Which is 100% ethyl alcohol. . .)

    17. brutus Says:

      John Kaminski is morphing into a world-class White Nationalist.

      The jew has helped him along by trying to starve him to death by taking away his livelihood.

      Old brutus proverb:
      A White Nationalist is a Conservative who’s been mugged by the jew (and had his job stolen)

    18. alex Says:

      Kaminski is an awakening leftist. I give him some slack. It’s the deliberate liars and obfuscators who call themselves White Nationalists that get the harshest criticism, for they confuse people – deliberately. You cannot be a White nationalist and a philosemite. Jews are not Whites any more than they are Westerners.

    19. Jaroslav Hus Says:

      Sehnsucht nach dem Reich Says:

      11 August, 2006 at 5:01 pm

      “”When Kaminski targets the flaws of the victims of the Jews, and there are certainly big flaws, on which the Jews capitalize, he seems only to see the White race.””

      Shocking stupidity of Sehnsucht nach dem Reich !!!???
      When my children do something stupid or show some “flaws” I do not tell them not to worry because some other children are even worse bnut I do whatever I can to correct them. Kaminski is great White patriot and terible deficiencies of Whites disturb him instead as Sehnsucht nach dem Reich recomends, ignore Whitesa weakness, let Whites go down the drain. Seems that Sehnsucht nach dem Reich does not care very much about Whites?

    20. Boobus Americanus Says:

      I can see why some would say that Mr. Kaminski is anti-white; that is the response I’ve often had reading his essays. You do get the impression of someone blasting down the highway at 150mph concerning Jews, and then stopping on a dime with digital-like precision to fire a few at Whites, particularly WASPS.
      But some of the posts above that refer to him as a budding WN have given me pause to reflect. I like Jimbo’s Scale of Reliability. I would say that Kaminski is very reliable concerning Jews; and, not unreliable concerning Whites (because not all of his criticisms are wrong, just misguided) but, Biased.
      Still, ultimately, as far as his jabs, or even attacks at Whites go, I am always left unmoved. The reason; whether White or Jewish, whether Anti-Jewish or Anti-White; he has a gift for Explanation, and it IS a gift, just like other races have their own talents. In fact, one could say that Explanation is THE quintessential gift of the White race. And I don’t mean BS excuses, lies, deciet, etc. though everyone from everywhere can do that pretty well, even us; NO ONE is better at the intellectual process of Explanation than Whites; hands down, no doubt. Once Whites themselves figure this out; once they begin to figure out the mechanics of explanation; its history in the world, and especially in the West, up to the present; we will REALLY be able to reduce any other argument, from anyone else, to rubble. And that is saying plenty; because people like himself are already doing a good job.
      A man like Kaminski, who has mentioned in passing more than once in his work, the importance of self-realization (another White phenomenon; do you think the Chinese have this concept for example?), and who surely must have felt his own gifts relating to Explanation move within him (even if he has never come out and identified it); will one day see that Self-realization and the Power of Explanation are not only connected, but conspicuously visible in the White man throughout History; in fact, without the need to “Know Thyself” and without the ability to Explain it to others; and without the ingenuity to commit that explanation to print, there would be no History! No recorded History! No memory! One day soon Mr. Kaminski will see the very valuable place he holds among an illustrious list of names; all belonging to White men; and he will simply not be able to doubt it any longer; he will from that day on HAVE to take this OBVIOUS fact into account and it will begin to temper his criticism; cool his passion, and balance his judgement. And even if from that day, he still can not call the White man his friend, he will no longer be able to call him his enemy.

    21. Giles Says:

      Kaminski’s deli open for business. No Jews, just schlock. Discounts for goyim with coupon.

      They dont need bullets for you people, your minds must be melting away at this point anyway.

      its nice to see that two objects can actually occupy the same space at the same time, contrary to all logic.