24 August, 2006

New Anti-Speech Net Regulation in Britain

Posted by alex in BNP, Britain at 6:16 pm | Permanent Link

New laws to criminalise political dissent

23rd August 2006

News article filed by BNP legal team

 
 
 
 
 
 
In the last few weeks the entire nature of the laws that regulate the internet have fundamentally changed. Though the Police have long had the power to prosecute people for their actions on the Internet they have in the past been unwilling to do so. This policy began to change last year when individuals were prosecuted and jailed for posting information on a website that was considered to be part of a campaign of racial harassment.Since then two individuals have been charged with crimes related specifically to posting illegal information on the internet. Mr. Simon Sheppard has been charged with ten counts of “Incitement to Racial Hatred” and Mr. Luke O’Farrell with two counts even though the website of Mr. Sheppard is hosted in the United States. This means that those individuals who post information on forums, bulletin boards and websites hosted in the US, can now be prosecuted for incitement to racial hatred, incitement to violence and glorification of terrorism in the United Kingdom.

The time limit on the nature of what is considered as ‘ terror ‘ is not specified, so includes those who glorify the 1916 Easter Uprising , the Bolshevik Revolution , the Nazi era and Islamist violence worldwide.

Glorification

This law also covers those who wish to propagate and encourage political activities and actions that are based on following the methodology of those groups that used terror in the past as part of their political programmes.

Therefore those that seek to encourage people to follow the political methodology of political movements linked with violence and terrorism as defined by the CPS and the Attorney General, such as Islamic terrorism and Nazism, as part of a contemporary political programme, or who glorify or encourage such political methodology as part of a contemporary political programme, will now be under the scope of the law. It is not what ordinary people think, it is how the politically motivated operatives of the Labour government, the senior police chiefs, the CPS and the courts decide how the law should be applied.

No actions have to have taken place in order for the law to be triggered, all that needs to happen is that the words used can be seen as encouraging or glorification of violence such as against an ethnic group or religion. This includes the encouragement of people to follow political ideologies based on violence or that use violence as part of their political methodology.

In effect this law bans the promotion, glorification and encouragement of political ideologies that in the past have used violence, or applied violence, as part of their political programmes. It also applies to those political ideologies that have used violence as an integral part of its methodology or whose actual social and political manifestation would result in violence against groups in society. The nature of the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism are not defined and therefore include those that follow a political ideology with the intent that upon gaining power acts of terrorism directed against specific groups will follow.

Indirect encouragement

Indirect encouragement statements include every statement which glorifies the commission or preparation (whether in the past, in the future or generally) of terrorism and therefore includes those who promulgate ideologies that have used violence in the past and who would use violence in the future. As the definition of commission or preparation of terrorism is not defined, it can include taking part in the political process itself if the ideology being followed has its basis in violence or been linked to violence in the past. It can also apply to those followers of violent historical ideologies who use non-violent means today in order to take power but whose ideology is rooted in terror in the past and also whose attainment of power would result in violence in the future.

The new laws on ‘ Encouragement and Glorification of Terrorism ‘ under Section 1 of the Terrorism Act 2006 include the crime of Encouragement of terrorism (section 1): This prohibits the publishing of “a statement that is likely to be understood by some or all of the members of the public to whom it is published as a direct or indirect encouragement or other inducement to them to the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism or Convention offences.” Indirect encouragement statements include every statement which glorifies the commission or preparation (whether in the past, in the future or generally) of such acts or offences; and is a statement from which those members of the public could reasonably be expected to infer that what is being glorified is being glorified as conduct that should be emulated by them in existing circumstances.” The maximum penalty is seven years’ imprisonment.

Disseminating terrorist publications (Section 2): Prohibits the dissemination of a publication which is either (a) likely to be understood as directly or indirectly encouraging terrorism, or (b)includes information which likely to be understood as being useful in the commission or preparation of an act of terrorism. The maximum penalty is seven years’ imprisonment.

Monitoring

We now know that a dedicated team of officers within the Police are actively monitoring and compiling information on those who run and post on various websites for future prosecution. The BNP cannot and will not tolerate any member who posts information on the internet that breaches race relations legislation or who facilitates the posting of such information on the internet. Facilitation can also be interpreted as moderation on sites where illegal information is being posted, or assisting sites where illegal information is being posted, or assisting or moderating on internet sites.

As a result of this new law the Internet will be used for entrapment, infiltration by paid security agitators mainly to destabilize and criminalize legitimate political organisations that follow and abide by the law. Our members are advised of these important changes in the law and that the luxury of expressing individual opinions on various public and visible forums must be balanced by their responsibility and loyalty towards the greater good of the party.

http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=1101 


  • Similar posts:

    1. 09/13/06 Fighting Loxism in Britain 23% similar
    2. 07/11/06 New Design School for Britain? 23% similar
    3. 09/01/08 Big Chimp-Out in Britain; Hundreds Arrested 20% similar
    4. 11/14/06 Britain Today… 16% similar
    5. 03/30/07 Jewed-Britain Denier 14% similar
    6. 7 Responses to “New Anti-Speech Net Regulation in Britain”

      1. Coup d'Etat Says:

        “Inciting racial hatred” Wow that’s really devasting.

        How about England agreeing to let Arabs who are known to be such violent terrorists stay and live in England? How about the fact that every White person there is not allowed to protect himself/herself by any means against a violent foreigner? How about the fact that little is done to protect the Whites from being blasted apart on trains and buses from so called Arab/Pakistan terrorists? How about how the police department arresting little White children and takes blood to keep their DNA on file for just simply building a tree house in someone else’s backyard?

        Who is really inciting hatred?

      2. Henry Says:

        Would that also include the “glorification” of the bombing of the King David hotel, or the encouragement of the use of cluster bombs or white phosphorous against civilians in Lebanon?

      3. Elite Aryan Crack Smoker Says:

        Yo, my nizzles! This is the Best Possible News! Now, anybody who commemorates or otherwise celebrates “The Founding of Israel” or for that matter, disseminates terroristic material from the Talmud — is toast!

        Remember Deir Yassin! Remember the King David Hotel! Remember Sabra!

        Keg time! Whoohoo!

      4. Scipio Americanus Says:

        Elite Aryan, have you been hitting the crack pipe again? Who do you think pushed for these laws in the first place? Hymie will be exempt just like in the good old days of the USSR. One standard for Jews, another for the hated Aryan. Remember, the inmates are now running the asylum. These Talmudic inspired laws officially put Britain in the totalitarian camp along with the Soviet Socialist Republic of Kanada and could very well be a prelude to what the kikes want to do here in the U.S. Unlike Europe, however, we still have our First Amendment rights and a 2nd Amendment to back it up! Remember that Hymie! Here is a piece of advice for the self chosen people: DON’T TREAD ON ME!

        Strength and Honor

      5. Sándor Petőfi Says:

        “Indirect encouragement” of the “political methodology” of a past or present “terrorist” group … in other words, they could lock anyone up for anything they like.

      6. Celtic Warrior Says:

        The BNP have lost their balls, if they ever had any. My advice to WN in the jwK, don’t be intimidated keep posting. The talmudo-legal system can’t prosecute you all. The system is seriously worried that White people are awakening!

      7. james carlisle Says:

        IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ARE SLY AND CUNNING IN THE WAY YOU DEAL WITH YOUR ENEMYS, 1 ALWAYS SMILE IN HIS FACE, 2PRETEND YOU HERE WHAT HE HAS TO SAY, 3PLAN HIS DISTRUCTION BEHIDE THIS BACK,4 WHEN MAKING WAR GET TWO OF YOUR ENEMYS TO KILL EACH OTHER.4 MAKE WAR IN SUCH A WAY THAT HE CANT BLAME YOU,PRETEND YOU DONT KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT.5EXTEND YOU POWER THOUGH, THE VERY NATURE OF FREEDOM ITSELF,5

        5 THIS IS WHY THE BNP WILL RULE ,OTHER NATIONISTS TEND TO SHOW THERE EMOTIONS, NOT A SMART THING TO DO

      Leave a Reply

      You may use the following HTML tags in your comments.

      <a abbr acronym b blockquote cite code del em i q strike strong>