THOMSON: Letters
Posted by alex in Eric Thomson at 4:19 pm | 
Permanent Link
5 OCT 05. Dear [ ]: Whites in Africa have always been suckers for “written guarantees” in sellout constitutions, as we see most recently in Zimbabwe. I am surprised that White Africans do not learn what Africa has to teach: that might makes right, & no words can substitute for power. This is true throughout the world, but it is most obvious in Africa, where even the very slow-witted should perceive this reality, unless they are blinded by wishful-thinking, as I suspect. Before Ian Smith’s sellout of Rhodesia, Whites babbled about “power-sharing.” I don’t know which jew &/or Freemason cooked that oxymoron up, for shared power means lost power, in reality. Sorry, Whitey, there’s no power for you!
My African experience led me to correlate biology with culture. All areas where Blacks settle resemble the squalor, poverty & tyranny of their native Africa, as the residues of White civilization erode. Typically, blacks live in authoritarian societies, beginning with their families, where the father is ‘king’ & his wives & children are his subjects, as well as his property. The Black father plays the same privileged role as does his tribal chief, who is a Black father writ large. All family members look to their fathers as the source of decisions & orders. The Black father has all the attributes of a slavemaster, plus! A Black slave owned by a stranger is not as burdened by social obligations as are the sons & daughters, as well as the wives of a traditional Black father. Because of this authoritarian culture, Blacks look to “the father” for benefits & punishments. Personal initiative & asking “why?” are brutally discouraged, as is disobedience. Hence, all signs of independence are equated with rebellion in Black culture. We must not conclude that Black authoritarianism precludes theft, exploitation & corruption, especially when the “us” & “them” standard is applied. Black culture has very few in terms of “us” & very many of “them,” usually Blacks of other tribes, &, of course, Whites. The Whites are also father-figures, to whom the Blacks look for all benefits, & against whom the Blacks lay their grievances for everything, especially Black shortcomings. they do this because their Whites father-figures are not respected. This is because a real father hands out stern punishment as well as largesse. One old askari told my father that Blacks of his generation respected their previous German colonial masters, because they were consistent & tough. The Blacks knew how much they could transgress before the machineguns were brought out & used, which was not much, at all! It is unpleasant, but Blacks have great respect for masters who ask, “Give me one reason why I should not kill you today!”
Since culture stems from biology, it is no surprise that the corrupt Black governments of Detroit & Wayne County would expect Whitey to pull them out of their trek back to the Stone Age, while blaming Whitey for ‘racism” in the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina & Rita. Irresponsibility is the hallmark of Black behavior & Black culture, whether in Black Africa or in Black America. For Blacks’ sake, I’d wish it were otherwise, & so should they!
Indian author & Africa-traveller, Shiva Naipaul, described the mutually-corrosive effects of White culture in the midst of Black culture. We can see the same degeneration in reverse, in America, so the healthy, harmonious course is separation, not miscegenation, which combines the evils of both cultures. Latin America provides us with another example of racial-cultural mixing & its dysfunctional outcome. Because these mongrels are dysfunctional in their own lands, they are coming to populate the rest of North America. The fact that we encourage them to invade our livingspace indicates that we are at least as dysfunctional as they are. My racism is thus even-handed, but is it ‘politically correct’? Ha!
I noticed an item on a videoscreen at a local bank, which quoted Greenspan as telling French Finance Minister Berton that “the U.S. deficits are out of control!” Greenspan is known for his veiled statements & carefully chosen words, so is he also out of control? If I were a foreign lender, I would have good reason for alarm, for the USS TITANIC is drowning in debt, just as we have been saying. Captain Greenspan finally admits it. Too bad we are not mistaken!
What we are seeing in the bastard state of Iraq may well be a prelude to events in the multi-national bastard empire called the USA, where our elections & constitution are equally divorced from Political, Economic & Demographic reality: Voodoo politics addresses illusions, not reality, as we may soon learn. Orwell said that “who defines controls”, but not when the situation is really out of control!
All the best, as always. DOWZ! & ORION! – E.T.
5 NOV 06. Hail [ ]! We can learn a lot from our heroes & our martyrs, but we must also be aware of the results, if any, which they achieved. My relatives fought on both sides of The Civil War, for example. Everyone who fought in that war was a hero & a martyr to one degree or another. The results were that we killed our fellow Whites, in order to make jews & Blacks much stronger in our own country. Such a deal! We did an even ‘better’ job in World Wars I & II. Should we worship such men? Listen to the laughter of our racial enemies at what we did to ourselves, & start thinking for a change, White man! If we understand what those men did to Our Race, it would have been much better if they’d just stayed home & talked about it. Using one’s muscles is good exercise, but using one’s mind is important at all times, for that is all that distinguishes man from other animals. We must not allow our enemies to use our best traits against us. Always ask yourself: Is this good for White people? Just because we can do something does not always mean we should. Just as often, it is wise to do nothing. Thinking & talking are also good exercise, which allow us to make better decisions about what we should or should not do. We can also do things better, when we decide to act.
Before we got ourselves into Iraq I had an argument with a fellow who is said to be a Pentagonian zogling. He said that we could invade Afghanistan & Iraq quite easily with our high-tech weaponry. I agreed, but I said: “But when we occupy, we will begin to die, for in occupation one gets close to people who hate us. We will continue to die until we wise up & get out.” The zogling paid me an odd, left-handed compliment. He called me Colonel Blimp, because I’d fought in the last colonial war in Africa, which ended in 1980. He thought that my military knowledge was ancient history & irrelevant to ‘modern warfare.’ Unfortunately, I was right, as I usually hate to be. Napoleon noted that “the moral is to the material as 3 to 1.” A determined enemy can aways find a way to take advantage of a situation, especially if he is willing to blow himself up in order to cause the other side some injuries & losses. Against this moral factor we are losing, as is obvious.
None of the targets of “The Turner Diaries” is revolutionary, that is, strategic, as in 9-11. In other words, all such targets serve the ZOG, not the enemies of the ZOG. No informants were necessary for such actions against such targets to gain public support for the ZOG. We must always ask, “Cui bono?” Who benefits from any action?
I knew George Burdi alias Eric Hawthorne for a few years when I was in Toronto. He talked much tougher than he was, so when ZOG ‘talked’ to him after they raided Resistance Records, he got the message & caved in, but not before he’d gotten a few Whites boys into trouble, when they heeded his advice. I have his picture as leader of a Black rock band. Again, we should learn from his example: one can talk brave, but will one be brave when the chips are down? Burdi always impressed me as extreme in his statements. Men who know combat are usually quiet-spoken. They don’t say much. They just do it, & they don’t say much after doing it. Heroism is no big deal for brave men, whom I have been privileged to konw & work with. That’s why Burdi made me wonder if he could take the heat in ZOG’s kitchen. It turned out that he couldn’t, but I do not despise him for that. He was willing to take the test, & he failed. Sure, he did something, so he is a martyr, but no hero. “Nice try, but no cigar,” as the carney workers say. Our Race turned out to be unimportant to Georgie, despite all his posturing that it was. In the end, it was Georgie who was most important. I wonder what will become of him, for the ZOG has a handle on him from now on. It’s like telling someone that “fire burns, & it hurts,” so if you want to pick up that hot iron, good luck. Call me in the morning.
Portugal is like America. It’s a place, not a race, so a few Whites can even be found in that country, but probably not many, according to my Portugese professor, who was dark, himself. The Shi-ite Moslem cleric, Muqtada Al Sadr, reminds me of him. Many people of Spain & Portugal also have Arab blood, as I’ve noticed when I lived in those countries. There are many Arabic words in Spanish, not only place names like Guadalajara & Alhambra, but albanil (stone mason, bricklayer) & algebra (that math we all love). Ha!
As a White Nationalist, I wish you all the best, as always. ORION! — Eric
SOVEREIGNTY, POWER & MONEY by E. Thomson
Meyer Amschel, the founder of the House of Rothschild, supposedly said, “Give me the power to coin and issue money and I care not who makes the laws!” When we gave power to create money out of nothing to the jew-banksters of the Federal Reserve, we gave away our sovereignty. The fact that the jews are permitted to charge us interest on every dollar they allow us to print is monstrous in the annals of self-inflicted slavery. For the body politic, charging interest on our country’s currency is worse than an addiction, for a drug addict only pays for more of his drug. He does not pay more and more for the drugs he has already taken! Our addiction to credit, that is, borrowed money upon which interest is charged, is slavery, and like drug addiction, it is a form of slavery we have ourselves chosen.
“What is the difference between banking and counterfeiting?” I asked my economics professor, who was on the local Federal Reserve Board. He smiled and replied: “Bankers do not print money and counterfeiters do not charge interest.” “Banking sounds like a better racket than counterfeiting,” I commented. He just smiled and changed the subject.
Goods and services are what give value to money. Without prodcutivity, money has no value, even if it be gold or silver. This truth is borne out by “Gold Rush prices” in California, such as $5 in gold for an egg, provided one were available. The misallocation of productivity into the acquisition of gold, silver and gems ruined the economies of the Spanish and Portuguese empires. Spain’s most prosperous time, in terms of gold and silver, was its worst time in terms of poverty and inflation. When diamonds were discovered in Brazil, the ruler of the Portuguese empire, the Marquis de Pombal, asked “what manner of wealth was this, which drew the peasant from the land, the artisan from the forge and impoverished the people?”
“Money is power,” said an Ostensible White. “And the power to create money is sovereignty,” I said. I added to that the fact that no people on earth, except the jews, have the power to create money out of nothing. Hence, only the jews are sovereign, for all states and peoples depend on them for their money supply and all are exploited by usury, that is, interest owed on that money to the jew-banksters. By controlling the supply of money, the jews also dictate policy on such matters as wars, immigration, propanda, economic activities and the operations of government. It is all so open and so simple that only the Gentiles do not see it. It took Dorothy’s little dog to unmask the Wizard of Oz. Does it take me, Eric Thomson, to point out the obvious?
Without productivity, money has no value and no power at all. Without producers, there is no productivity. The White people of the world have consented to give their sovereignty to the jew banksters and their Zionist lackeys. We have thus traded our birthright for a sham and slavery. The jews have no power of themselves, for they are vampires who do not produce, but exploit the producers. The question is, why do we let them? Without our power and our productivity, the ZOG is both impoverished and impotent. Our enemies are only as strong as we, by our own consent and efforts, choose to make them.
By taking back our sovereignty from these tyrants and tricksters, we shall be able to use our power and productivity on our behalf, not our enemies’. By doing so, the Aryan can cast off the invisible chains of Zionist slavery and take over the tiller of his own destiny. If, for example, a bankster were to foreclose on one’s house, one could deprive him of his ill-gotten gains by turning the house into ashes, but why do that when we have the power to turn the bankster into ashes?
Those who do not resist the ZOG collectively must suffer individually. ORION!
22 November, 2006 at 5:03 pm
An excellent summation of our collective plight, but by what means can we take back our sovereignty from these tyrants and tricksters?
22 November, 2006 at 6:42 pm
Let’s say there is an Arayn Bank; how much should they charge you to borrow a thousand dollars for one year? A personal loan.
Consider that the loan committee is made up of me, Alex, Agis, Elite Aryan Crack Smoker, and one or two other German-Aryan characters. What kind of assurance could you offer us that you will make your monthly payments.
Naturally, we can talk about a loan for the purchase of a piece of equipment for your productive Aryan business.
Get my drift bucko…
22 November, 2006 at 8:47 pm
Excellent read!
Oh hey about those monthly payments for that piece of equipment…I think I have a way to work that out hehehehe!
22 November, 2006 at 10:25 pm
Take a deep look at the Muslim banking system. It may be the only institutional foundation of the Muslim nations that we can learn from. They have an entirely different way of allocating capital and paying for its use. Very intriguing.
22 November, 2006 at 11:15 pm
E.Thomson always provides a depth of insight that is rare, even among the well educated . Never pass up the opportunity to read an article of his and give your mind the proper time to digest his ideas . Your time will never be better spent .
23 November, 2006 at 3:27 am
E Thomson sez: “I knew George Burdi alias Eric Hawthorne for a few years when I was in Toronto. He talked much tougher than he was, so when ZOG ‘talked’ to him after they raided Resistance Records, he got the message & caved in, but not before he’d gotten a few Whites boys into trouble, when they heeded his advice. I have his picture as leader of a Black rock band. Again, we should learn from his example: one can talk brave, but will one be brave when the chips are down? Burdi always impressed me as extreme in his statements. Men who know combat are usually quiet-spoken. They don’t say much. They just do it, & they don’t say much after doing it. Heroism is no big deal for brave men, whom I have been privileged to konw & work with. That’s why Burdi made me wonder if he could take the heat in ZOG’s kitchen. It turned out that he couldn’t, but I do not despise him for that. He was willing to take the test, & he failed. Sure, he did something, so he is a martyr, but no hero. “Nice try, but no cigar,†as the carney workers say. Our Race turned out to be unimportant to Georgie, despite all his posturing that it was. In the end, it was Georgie who was most important. I wonder what will become of him, for the ZOG has a handle on him from now on. It’s like telling someone that “fire burns, & it hurts,†so if you want to pick up that hot iron, good luck”
the average white man has little or no contact with the more serious side of ‘law enforcement’ EVER…apart: perhaps: from the occasional ‘speeding ticket’!
this is just as applicable to white nationalists as it is to the great majority of ‘lemmings’!
as such: there are few ppl who could emerge un-scathed from a prolonged encounter with even regular cops and survive the ‘psychological pressure’ of a short, temporary incarceration ‘virgo intacto’; i.e: w/out falling down in some area: by either making statements implicating them-selves or others or by disclosing incriminating details…..LET ALONE: survive strong & rough handling whilst @ the mercy of vrs un-accountable ZOG ‘agencies’!
such resistance to ZOG requires special & prolonged training
(usually only afforded ‘elite units’ like the SAS or Green Berets!….and, EVEN THEN, it doesn’t ALWAYS work!)….or: failing such: is usually the preserve of tough, hardened, career ‘crims’ well versed in the techniques and tricks of ‘police interrogation’ and able to with-stand a large amount of physical and psychological abuse.
so: it is being a bit too harsh, IMHO, to condemn the likes of George Burdi out-right!
our movement requires both activists and proslytisers: tacticians & theoriticians: just like any other revolutionary move-ment in history…..those who choose ‘activism’ or who are chosen AS ‘acitivists’ must be ‘the toughest of the tough’: effectively: Waffen SS ‘elite class’: any-thing LESS is simply ASKING for trouble: especially when: as will inevitably happen: some ‘fall into the claws’ of ZOG!……THAT is when you need to be ROCK HARD!
by the same token: this is not to denigrate those who choose to be proslytisers or ‘theoriticians’: without an intellectual base: a revolutionary movement is just a dis-organised rabble!
WE NEED BOTH CATEGORIES….the ‘secret of success’ is for each individual to accept his or her own limitations: recognising their inherent individual abilities & weaknesses and, thus, make the correct decision as to WHERE they are best suited in the grander scheme of White Revolution!
23 November, 2006 at 6:02 am
Olde Dutch, here is a possible answer to your question:
In the Bizantine and Bulgarian Empires, usury was forbidden by law (no jews in both places). For 800 years, both countries enjoyed total lack of inflation and constant growth, despite being at war with each-other all the time. The reason?
There was one yearly tax, per family: 1 sack of grain (25 Kilos), 1 jug of wine. That was it.
Don’t take from people what’s theirs, and they won’t need to borrow. Gold would go where it belongs – on the roofs of buildings, for jewelry, wire, nigger teeth etc., and not in bank vaults for the jew to sit on.
23 November, 2006 at 6:51 pm
Two points stand out here:
One, The System is designed to – and always will – destroy ANYTHING that challenges its monopoly on the use of force, in general, and the use of deadly force, in particular. I don’t care who you are; a month in truly solitary confinement is usually enough to make anyone decide that the battle is not worth it. Worse, ALL of your former friends and associates recognize that to get too close to you is to risk having the same thing happen to them.
Simple as that.
You will be surprised at how quickly you will be abandoned by all who new you before, and you will feel you have been horribly used by all parties.
Again, ANYONE who proposes the use of force to you is ALWAYS working for the System, and – if you haven’t figured this out yet – is “suggesting” you do something that they won’t do themselves.
There’s a reason for that, as you will see when they are testifying against you in court.
Ask Matt Hale how simple it is for them to do that; he’s doing life in concrete, for not taking an affirmative step of rebuking the person who spoke to him, and WALKING AWAY – FAST – and, if he follows you, tell him if he keeps following you, he will be following you to the police station.
Besides, look at the personal track record of the agent provocatuer; nothing in his life suggests anything remotely resembling success, so why even talk to a loser?
Two, by accepting the Goddamn JEW’s terms, we accept their frame of reference; the mechanistic nature of interest, in general, and usury interest, in particular, guarantees that a rate of interest greater than the rate of economic growth is simply a policy of wealth transfer, from the poor to the rich, and simply hollows out the truly productive sector of the economy, trapping the working man in the Red Queen’s Race.
An elegant solution presents itself:
One, replace corporations with cooperatives.
Two, replace industrial banks with organic credit unions today, as facilitators of social credit, tomorrow.
Three, create organic structures to handle asset transfers – for example, instead of borrowing the money for a combine, borrow the money for a combine to be used by the members of a partnership developed solely for the use of the combine – separate use from ownership, if you will – and link payment for the combine to the productivity increases CREATD by the use of the combine. For instance, pay for the use of the combine with a certain amount of grain of a certain quality on an agreed-upon schedule.
This restructures the transaction away from the mechanistic debt-based fiat money, and towards an organic economic order that arises naturally out of the productive relationships within the society.
These were the ideas developed by NSDAP economists as they threw off the yoke of the Goddamn JEWS, and could come to fruition, a step at a time, as possibly outlined in the Journal of Theoretical National Socialist Studies proposed by Bill White, or, better, a National Socialist society such as that envisioned in the Northwest Trilogy of novels by Harold Covington.
WE ARE THE CREATIVE RACE, and all other races, at best, are imitators; at worst, they are parasites.
And what do we owe our parasites?
New America
An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!
24 November, 2006 at 11:13 am
Re jimbo:
It’s quite true what you say. For our ancestors physical violence was not an unusual experience. A man was expected to be able to deal with real physical threats. As a consequence they were tougher people, mentally as well as physically.
Unfortunately, most white men in the western world almost never encounter physical violence after they leave school. In school fighting, roughhousing and hard sports are fairly normal activities for boys, at least they were when I was in school. After that, however, life may be intellectually and socially challenging but rarely do white men experience physical violence, unless they are victims of crime.
Our racial enemies on the other hand live in a world of violence. Niggers, spics and wogs experience it on a regular basis. They are largely innured to it, and, as such, are better prepared mentally for the tough times ahead than the average white man.
For most white men to be assaulted would be a traumatic experience. We need to change this condition. The safety nets against chaos that we take for granted won’t always be there. The time will come, and it may not be as far away as you think, when you may find yourself and your family facing regular physical threats from a variety of sources. You need to toughen yourself up now so that you won’t collapse like a quivering jelly if you are smashed in the face by some thug. Remember, your womenfolk will instinctively look to you when threats loom. All the feminism in the world will not change that condition. Take up boxing or, if young enough, some contact sport like rugby. Pushing weights in a gym is not good enough in my opinion. You need to feel the agression of another man against you. Try to get to see some of the ugly sides of society. Maybe a bareknuckle fight, or a dog fight. Visit a slaughter house. See how the down-and-outs live. You need to shock yourself into a tougher frame of mind. If you don’t already know how learn to use guns, if you are lucky enough to live in a country that allows ownership. Also, learn how to play smart. Don’t go looking for trouble and shooting your mouth off. There’s a world of trouble out there looking for you. ZOG has you and every other white man in its sights. If you think that life is going to continue like it has for the last fifty years you are mistaken. Yes, there are a few places which will weather the storm without too much trauma but don’t count on being there. The rich, of course, have the resources to help them escape, but for the rest of us it’s tough times.
24 November, 2006 at 1:31 pm
“This restructures the transaction away from the mechanistic debt-based fiat money, and towards an organic economic order that arises naturally out of the productive relationships within the society.”
Hitler, and his National Socialist economic braintrust were Keynesian in outlook and practice…they were not primitive communists as you & Bolg maintain.
24 November, 2006 at 3:33 pm
In response to Olde Dutch:
Olde Dutch wrote, quoting New America:
“This restructures the transaction away from the mechanistic debt-based fiat money, and towards an organic economic order that arises naturally out of the productive relationships within the society.â€
Olde Dutch replied:
Hitler, and his National Socialist economic braintrust were Keynesian in outlook and practice…they were not primitive communists as you & Bolg maintain.
in reply:
I must disagree.
Keynesianism was a specific solution to one problem in one time – how do you replace the money the bank system removed from the money supply – almost a THIRD – which led to the banking system controlling the productive assets of a people for less than a dime on the dollar.
So, while Keynes replaced money with debt based Treasury paper – yes, the Goddamn JEWS got us coming and going, while the JEW-controlled media only addressed the external matters of substance (loss of small and medium sized family owned business and farms, for example), the JEW-controlled financial system replaced the liquidity of the currency with a new form of liquidity – ignoring, for the moment their small change gift to Roosevelt of gold confiscated at one price, and repriced at a new, higher price, giving Roosevelt a fortune for his new government without concern for Congressional financing system. If memory serves,
That is a lot in one paragraph – shorten it to say they took out money from the banking system so they could control the debts, while insuring the central government HAD to borrow to replace the money the JEW-controlled bankers took out of the economy, forcing the liquidation of so many small family businesses, and farms.
THUS, Keynesian fiscal stimulus is simply another word for debt-based specie monetary stimulus, used to transfer assets from the poor to the rich.
By no stretch of the imagination were Schacht, et.al., “primitive communists” – quite the contrary.
They were organic socialists – like we have in such “primitive communist” economies as Sweden, Norway, Finland… you get the idea, all of which have higher standards of living than we do.
They did not support State ownership of the means of production, using the creative talents supported by private ownership to CREATE a remarkable social order, with the economic structures serving the citizenry, the STAKEHOLDERS, and not merely the shareholders, and the bankers.
These ideas are put forward to remind us of what was, and will be again, if only for the sake of OUR posterity.
New America
An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!
24 November, 2006 at 5:43 pm
There was no “removal of the banking system” by Hitler & the National Socialists—matter of fact Haljamar Schacht was a banker. Btw, all German currency of the NS period was “fiat” currency with no precious metals content at all—and—not directly exchangable into precious metals either. Because Germany had no precious metals to speak of. In the United States our currency was fully convertible into silver, and foreign holders of American dollars could convert to gold at a fixed $35 dollars an ounce.
Hitler, Schacht, Ley, etc. were hard headed economic pragmatists—they were not into some organic make believe fairy tale world—the German’s have a word for it.
24 November, 2006 at 9:09 pm
To clear up a misunderstanding:
Olde Dutch Says:
24 November, 2006 at 5:43 pm
There was no “removal of the banking system†by Hitler & the National Socialists—matter of fact Haljamar Schacht was a banker.
in reply:
We all know that; if memory serves, he demonstrated his skills starting in 1923, when he replaced the old mark, which was valued at 4.2 TRILLION to trhe dollar, with the new mark, which was 4.2 to the dollar. It was a start, but he also developed structural initiatives, like forming cartels that could issue bonds, eliminating the governmental ministries altogether.
After all, what had the governmental ministries become, but the hollow forms of the past, without the life of the present?
Olde Dutch wrote:
Btw, all German currency of the NS period was “fiat†currency with no precious metals content at all—and—not directly exchangable into precious metals either. Because Germany had no precious metals to speak of. In the United States our currency was fully convertible into silver, and foreign holders of American dollars could convert to gold at a fixed $35 dollars an ounce.
in reply:
Exactly, and the currency boards worked around the idea that the source of value is the productivity of the people; the currency is simply a means to an organic end, as the tool to facilitate such productive relationships, and NOT a means to an inorganic end per se, the remorseless, productivity-sapping iron law of compound interest.
Old Dutch wrote:
Hitler, Schacht, Ley, etc. were hard headed economic pragmatists—they were not into some organic make believe fairy tale world—the German’s have a word for it.
in reply:
They were hard-headed realists, as NS Germany required; however, they were fully aware that the best system for bankers was a system that served the productive – organic – economic interests of the people, and not merely as a tool to make them serfs under a different name.
The brilliant audacity of the young Chancellor telling the world, “We can not pay the Versailles debts, and we will not pretend to be able to reapy the Versailles debts,” freed up an enormous amount of economic power for the good of the German people, and not the predatory Goddamn JEWS who dictated the economic terms of Versailles.
Thus, the international intermediaries were replaced with direct State to State barter system – Argentine beef for German finished industrial products, for example – and the Goddamn JEWS international bankers could only watch in horror as the rest of the world, sinking ever deeper into the maw of the Great Depression, saw with deeds, and not merely words, what a miracle National Socialism was.
Remember, we are not bound to blindly following the NSDAP model of National Socialism; as an inherently organic system, we should expect to develop a model appropriate to our social structures, just as the Scandinavian countries have.
Right now, it seems, we are devolving to the Southern model – “Southern” as in “Mexico” – with the triumph of labor arbitrage over economic “productivity.”
Indeed, it seems the Race to the Bottom is well under way, and, either way, by accepting the terms of the Goddamn JEWS – EITHER WAY – we lose.
We, today, and our posterity, for generations to come.
New America
An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!
24 November, 2006 at 9:35 pm
bryan o’driscoll sez: “Take up boxing or, if young enough, some contact sport like rugby. Pushing weights in a gym is not good enough in my opinion. You need to feel the agression of another man against you. Try to get to see some of the ugly sides of society. Maybe a bareknuckle fight, or a dog fight. Visit a slaughter house”
yr ON the MONEY, once again!
‘bench pressing’ huge amnts of weights in a gym, while useful for building strength, is a bit of a ‘no brainer’: what is much more important is: ‘aerobic-type’ fitness: especially: ‘breathing & balance’: all the ‘bulk’ in the world is going to do you NO GOOD @ ALL if u can’t move fast enough: the ‘Holy Trinity’ of ‘boxing clever’ is: TIMING, FOOT-WORK & HITTING POWER!
along with this: of course: u’v gotta be able to handle aggression: especially physical aggression directed AT you!……even: in some cases: ‘martial arts’ won’t help you: you need to know how to STREET FIGHT and FIGHT DIRTY!…..this is where: for white males: some-times: a short stint in prison can be a useful lesson indeed in ‘the university of life’: even if yr trained in some form of ‘martial arts’: an aggressive ‘in yr face’ assailant can STILL ‘knock u rotten’: psychologically: you then lose precious seconds re: an advantage: and: then: it’s ALL OVER, red ROVER!
i’v known of cases where a black belt in karate was seriously injured by a ‘pub brawler’ because he wasn’t expecting a rapid attack with a broken beer glass to the jugular!
a GOOD STREET FIGHTER will ALWAYS beat a theoritical ‘martial artist’ hands DOWN…..the only comparable fighter is some-one with ‘special forces’ training: in particular: SAS….un-fortunately: youse Yanks don’t hv the ‘SAS’…..THEY are the BEST of the BEST….if any-one can ‘hook up’ with one even for a dzn or so ‘sessions’: even if it sets you back a $grand$ or more: it could be WELL WORTH IT: IT COULD SAVE yr life…especially: to learn how to use a variety of weapons: a ‘weapon’ of some sort(whether: beer bottle, bar stool, knife, table leg, pool cue, brick, hammer, metal bar, lead pipe, length of hard-wood or…even a gun!) is usually ‘@ hand’ and will usually ‘finish’ a brawl quickly & effectively: if used judiciously!….many men think they can ‘take on’ some-one in a fist-fight(usually: they get a rude awakening in the form of a massive kick to the nuts, the instep or the knee-caps!)….but a clout over the noggin with ½-a-house-brick will usually dis-abuse all but the most determined!
24 November, 2006 at 9:47 pm
“Portugal is like America. It’s a place, not a race, so a few Whites can even be found in that country, but probably not many, according to my Portugese professor, who was dark, himself. The Shi-ite Moslem cleric, Muqtada Al Sadr, reminds me of him. Many people of Spain & Portugal also have Arab blood, as I’ve noticed when I lived in those countries. There are many Arabic words in Spanish, not only place names like Guadalajara & Alhambra, but albanil (stone mason, bricklayer) & algebra (that math we all love). Ha!”
That is the most ridiculous perceptional summary of Portugal I have ever seen. You are right, Portugal is a place, not a race. Germany is a place, not a race. Portuguese, however, is a White Ethnicity. One individual you mention, whose pedigree is virtually impossible to know for sure and his own personal account of the country do not change reality. Only an idiot would base his entire perception of a country and its inhabitants on one personal experience with one individual. Judging by the fact that this man was a professor of yours he likely could be suffering from the same type of self loathing many liberal American Whites suffer from. The same type of self loathing that leads these types of people into claiming race doesn’t exist at all.
There is not one genetic study in existence that verifies your assertion that many Spaniards and Portuguese have large quantities of Arab DNA. One explanation could be the fact that the Moors (whom only successfully conquered about half of the peninsula) were not Arabs; they were Berbers. Culturally they were largely influenced by Arabia. They were Muslims and spoke Arabic. There also likely was a decent amount of Arabs among their ranks, however, nowhere near enough to constitute the majority of the Moorish population. Most studies only show a slight Semitic influence on a minority of Southern Iberians. That’s far from most.
The fact that there are some Arabic words in the Castilian Language also proves absolutely nothing. There are plenty of Greek & Latin words in the English language. Does that mean that the English are ethnically mixed with Greeks and Italians? The Spanish and Portuguese languages are primarially derrived from vulgar Latin. The lexical similarity of Castillian Spanish to Italian is 82%; French 75% and Romanian 71%. Most of the remaining 12% is derived from Basque & Celtiberian, but yes some Arabic words are there as well. Doesn’t prove anything on a racial level.
25 November, 2006 at 1:23 am
Also, to be clear on the linguistic figures, I forgot to add in that it is the 6% of Arabic/Semitic influence on Castilian that is the remaining amount; after the 12% Basque/Celtiberian.
25 November, 2006 at 1:57 am
“Btw, all German currency of the NS period was “fiat†currency with no precious metals content at all”
Untrue. 1934-1939 5 Reichsmarks were 90% silver, while 1934-1939 2 Reichsmarks were 62.5% silver.
25 November, 2006 at 11:16 am
Our modern US coins look like “silver”, in the same way that some German coins minted between 1934 to 1939 looked like “silver”. There were some German/National Socialist commerative coins minted that did have some silver content—these were for collectors and not intended for circulation as currency even if they were denominated in marks. Swastika coins etc. You pay two marks for a coin with one mark’s worth of silver in it—that kind of deal.
25 November, 2006 at 11:36 am
Olde Dutch, what I described wasnt at all a primitive form of communism. I would rather call it proto-libertarian.
25 November, 2006 at 12:24 pm
“Thus, the international intermediaries were replaced with direct State to State barter system – Argentine beef for German finished industrial products, for example – and the Goddamn JEWS international bankers could only watch in horror…”
Yeah, right. It’s called the balance of payments, and trade treaties, or trade agreements between Germany and Argentina. German marks were traded for Argentine beef. The Argentine then could by German machinery with the marks they had acquired from German beef purchases.
Today we get trade agreements like Nafta, Cafta, WTO, China PNTR…not in our favor. Hmmm. Nafta as national socialism…I’m sure the jews & their brainwashed will be using that analogy on TV soon…
25 November, 2006 at 2:21 pm
*sigh*
Olde Dutch?
THIS is the point that I have been trying to make; focusing our attention of a better FUTURE, by seeing how, by the wise use of the principles of the organic institutions of an NS Society, we can, in time, be freed of the Goodamn JEWS and their control of every sector of our society.
THIS is the phrase that pays:
“Remember, we are not bound to blindly following the NSDAP model of National Socialism; as an inherently organic system, we should expect to develop a model appropriate to our social structures, just as the Scandinavian countries have.”
I have cited the organic theocratic state of Brigham Young’s Utah (Deseret) as one model of how we organically develop relative solutions that transcend the false choices our RACIAL enemies would offer us.
The LDS Church’s President Hinckley says he has a picture of Brigham Young in his office, and, when faced with a perplexing question, asks, “WWBD? What Would Brigham Do?”
Young’s Vision of an organic NS State, in the theocratic form suitable to his time and place, would not work today; yet, the organic organizing principles are no less applicable then, than they are now.
If memory serves, their central economic bodies were the Bishop’s Storehouses, and accepted a local form of currency; NSDAP Germany, on the other hand, had a wide range of currency control systems called currency boards, which issued various currencies with various valuations for various purposes, ALL backed by the organic economic productivity of the German people.
New America
An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!
26 November, 2006 at 12:12 am
I agree with Thomson’s analysis of the Portuguese and Spanish groups and their history of mixing. Many do have arab and negroid admixture, and this should be brought under control, and ideally removed from western societies.
26 November, 2006 at 12:36 pm
“I agree with Thomson’s analysis of the Portuguese and Spanish groups and their history of mixing. Many do have arab and negroid admixture, and this should be brought under control, and ideally removed from western societies.”
I’m sure you do. I’m also sure that you have absolutely no idea about anything concerning Iberia outside of what you have read from Nordic biased bullshit, written by pseudo Historian quacks with no credentials in anything concerning history, anthropology or genetics.
You ignorantly assume, just as the original blogger, that the Moors were Arabs; they weren’t. They were a North African Caucasoid people (ancient Berbers), much like the ancient Carthaginians. Of course such things like cultural conversion escape morons like you. You are so quick to assume miscegenation, even when fact begs to differ. Well, I hate to break it to you as well, but it has already been verified from a number of different genetic studies that there is no substantial Semitic or Negro admixture found in Iberia. Rather, they found very minimal frequencies (of mainly Semitic DNA) in the southern most regions of the peninsula; which makes sense, due to the fact that Andalusia was the region longest occupied by the Moors and also is the region inhabited with the most Gypsies.
But if you want to talk about non-White admixture, why don’t you idiots ever discuss the mixing between Whites and Mongoloids that has been occurring in Central, Northern and Eastern Europe for literally thousands of years? This is not only verified historically, but is also clearly visible among analyzing numerous individuals from these regions. Squinty, slanted, eyes; high cheekbones, etc. are not a rare occurrence in many of those countries; including Germany to some degree. For example, just look at beloved Himmler. Don’t try and argue that he doesn’t look somewhat mixed with Mongoloid. Also, what about the fact that Jews have been in countries like Germany for the better part of 1700 years? Obviously mixing between Germans and those Semites was high.
Iberia had the Spanish Inquisition which, if you didn’t know, set the course for the first systematic process of expulsion and extermination of non-white elements in European history. Iberia had the Limpieza de sangre concept as well, which also aided in both identifying non-White elements and determining what their fate would ultimately be. Where were these practices in Central and Eastern Europe after they had endured the reign of the Huns?
As far as the so-called Negro admixture is concerned, where is your proof of large scale admixture between them and the Portuguese? It certainly is not genetically verified or even visible among the vast majority of the Portuguese. Negroes were simply brought in as slaves and were regarded just as low as they were by the French, Americans, etc. Obviously mixing did occur between Negroes and all White slave owners (not just the Portuguese) but the mulatto bastard children that would sometimes result in these affairs were absorbed into the Negro slave population, NOT the White population, you retard. That’s a very elementary fact. It’s funny that you people think that the Portuguese of that time period were just as socially liberal as the Whites of the modern day United States (which are only so bad now due to years of liberal indoctrination).
The kicker of this all is that here in the United States, as well as in Europe, the highest frequencies of Black and White relations occur with White individuals of predominantly Nordic/Northern European backgrounds.
So if you want to remove dubious elements from your already tainted Western Societies, you will be removing far more people than just Iberians.
26 November, 2006 at 5:29 pm
and the currency boards worked around the idea that the source of value is the productivity of the people
Those are just words, though. Now, I don’t really care if a currency is fiat, or if it is based on gold – which is just as useless as fiat money, and like fiat money only has value because people want to pretend it does.
What matters is if a country has a good people and economic policies that aren’t too suffocatingly socialist.
—————–
Fact, a question: where did all the Black slaves go, that Portugal imported? You say the mongrels in all slave nations would typically mix with the Blacks. But where did those Blacks go? Isn’t it true that they have been completely absorbed into the Portuguese population?
(Now, why does this matter? It matters, when race-mixing destroys the White male IQ outliers that bring society forward. Some will insist endlessly, knowing nothing about Finland, that they are mixed with Mongols which isn’t true. And even if it were – wow, a mix that looks White, acts White, and invents Nokia phones? Sounds better than most White populations.)
26 November, 2006 at 7:42 pm
There are a number of places where these slaves could have gone outside of Portugal. Brazil is a highly likely candidate. There also are towns/areas of Portugal today that are almost exclusively black or mulatto. The notion that these blacks (which numbers are grossly exaggerated by people like you) were entirely (or even largely) absorbed to the Portuguese population is absurd and primarily endorsed by pseudo-scholars with blatant Nordic biases. No credible Historians have put across such theories since the early 1900’s in America. The same kinds of people that minoritized the Irish and claimed that they too “suffered from low intelligence”. Since the advent of DNA analysis many of these theories have been put to rest. The only people still
It’s hilarious to me how you view mixing between Whites and Mongoloids less significant than Whites mixing with Semites for example. When in reality Semites, like the Moors, still fell in the Caucasoid category, because their non-White elements were less profound than that of Mongoloids. So, you could say that mixing between two Caucasoids is less detrimental to the genetic integrity of an individual, than mixing with a Mongoloid. Either way, you are a complete hypocrite if you are willing to “rid” Western Society from these supposedly “mixed” Iberians, yet do nothing about other mixed European peoples. No wonder most people don’t take racialism seriously.
And what of the Turks that invaded a large amount of continental Europe? You are conveniently disregarding their presence.