5 December, 2006

Jews Order Rudolf Books BURNED!!!

Posted by alex in free-speech martyrs, Lew Rockwell at 5:08 pm | Permanent Link

By Lew Rockwell

German Court Order: Scientific Work Must Burn!

Trial Over Grundlagen zur Zeitgeschichte (English: Dissecting the Holocaust) Ends With a Book-burning

Since the 7th of May Judge Burkhardt Stein of the Municipal Court of Tübingen held court on the fates of the publisher, editor and authors of the foundational Revisionist work Grundlagen zur Zeitgeschichte (Az. 4 Ls 15 Js 1535/95; click here for the English version of this book: Dissecting the Holocaust). First the trials against the authors were separated on various grounds. Then the trial against the editor Ernst Gauss alias Germar Rudolf (Scheerer*) was separated since the accused was not present at the proceedings. For that reason Judge Stein issued an arrest warrant.

During the trial the States Attorney and the Judge reproached the publisher Wigbert Grabert that the incriminated book met the test for the crime of race persecution in that it used a number of Holocaust-denying adjectives such as “supposed”, “presumed” and “so-called”. In order to show that the book had scientific merit the defense attorney insisted that in reading certain passages in the book, one needed to consult the comprehensive and detailed footnotes that it contained, which made reference mostly to books of establishment sources. The judge merely turned toward Susanne Teschner, the States Attorney, and answered that the court would not think out loud during the trial. The court denied numerous motions of the defense for recourse to relevant expert reports or for access to court records that might show that the words “supposed”, and so forth, did not per se constitute an intentional denying.

It also denied two motions of the defense to suspend the trial on grounds that in this trial there was theoretically no possibility that the judge would acquit the accused, because in such a case he might meet with social harassment or even criminal reprisal from the judicial system, as the case of Judge Orlet in the trial against Deckert has shown.

Several days after the beginning of the trial the expert witness Dr. Joachim Hoffmann was questioned as to whether the book Grundlagen zur Zeitgeschichte was scientific. Dr. Hoffmann, for decades a historian in the Military History Research Office of the Bundeswehr in Freiburg, wrote in his expert report to the following effect:

[…] The different articles [of the work Grundlagen zur Zeitgeschichte] are professionally sound and are written predominantly in an investigative manner. The footnote apparatus leaves little to be desired with respect to the extent or amount of detail and is quite helpful to the researcher in that it refers to the contrary literature without stint. […]The individual articles of the collection are well-reasoned and portray the material faithfully. […] The scientific character of this collection cannot be denied, especially in comparison to many publications from the contrary viewpoint whose scientific qualifications are never questioned. […]

The overall impression of this collection edited by Gauss is that its contents deserve to be studied – naturally with critical intelligence – just as is done with the “official” literature on the Holocaust which is never contested or impeded. Even in this case it should be that Audiatur et altera pars! To suppress this carefully supported research would be to work a powerful hindrance to legitimate striving for scientific understanding. The state of understanding never stands still. My experience is that misinterpretations and errors are part of the normal process of scientific controversy. One should not before the fact prohibit the critical capacity of the sovereign, free researcher and reader. The step from suppressing disapproved books to burning them is a short one. And thereby – although under a different pretext – we would have got back to where the whole mess began. […]
[emphasis added]

Concepts such as “presumed” or “supposed” did not please the expert witness, yet he did not consider that they put the scientific merit of the book in question.

The States Attorney’s pleading was next. The phrases in the book that offended her most – “supposed annihilation camp”, “Auschwitz club”, “Holocaust religion”, “identity-forming group phantasies”, “supposed genocide”, “established Holocaust scene”, “lead ad absurdum” -, although taken partly from established publications, deny the Nazi murder of Jews and therefore qualify as race persecution. According to the States Attorney, the expert witness Dr. Hoffmann was not as competent to judge whether the book was scientific as a jurist and his expert report should therefore be disregarded. The publisher Grabert should be sentenced to 9 months prison with possibility of parole.

On the last day of the trial, Saturday!, 15.6.1996, in his pleading the defense referred to the denunciations of the States Attorney, whereby the book was a pseudoscientific hack-job of the vilest sort, saying that this sort of speech was “pseudojuristic browbeating” without content or definition. The defense pointed to the high degree of scientific expertise that had been necessary to produce the book and also to the fact that the expert witness had unreservedly confirmed the book’s scientific quality. He also pointed out that sec. 130 para. 3 of the Penal Code (StGB) (race persecution) was unconstitutional when it served to deliver proven scientific publications up to book-burning.

The judge sentenced the publisher Grabert to pay a fine of DM 30,000 and ordered the seizure – in effect, the burning – of all copies of Grundlagen zur Zeitgeschichte as well as the prepared copy needed to print it. In the basis for his decision he stated that although parts of the book had scientific merit, phrases such as “supposed”, “presumed”, “victim of the Jews”, “imputed forethought”, “furious phantasies”, although partly drawn from citations of established personages, denied the Holocaust and therefore qualified as the crime of race persecution.


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 11/15/06 Rudolf Trial Begins 58% similar
  3. 11/30/06 Germar Rudolf Trial, Day Two 49% similar
  4. 04/05/06 Stolz Ejected Physically from Zundel Trial, Refuses to Kowtow to Kikes 35% similar
  5. 08/24/06 Grubach Writes to Amnesty Int’l Re Germar Rudolf 34% similar
  6. 04/18/06 Update: Verbeke, Rudolf Charged with Heresy 31% similar
  7. 20 Responses to “Jews Order Rudolf Books BURNED!!!”

    1. Eat My Schwartz Says:

      A crime means one has violated the rights of another- usually by force. Rudolf “violated the law”, but did he violate anyone’s rights?
      If not , then there is no crime. . .

    2. lawrence dennis Says:

      http://www.newspeakdictionary.com/ns-prin.html

      Newspeak Dictionary

      Excerpt from “The Principles of Newspeak”
      An appendix to 1984, Written by : George Orwell in 1948

      The C vocabulary was supplementary to the others and consisted entirely of scientific and technical terms. These resembled the scientific terms in use today, and were constructed from the same roots, but the usual care was taken to define them rigidly and strip them of undesirable meanings. They followed the same grammatical rules as the words in the other two vocabularies. Very few of the C words had any currency either in everyday speech or in political speech. Any scientific worker or technician could find all the words he needed in the list devoted to his own speciality, but he seldom had more than a smattering of the words occurring in the other lists. Only a very few words were common to all lists, and there was no vocabulary expressing the function of Science as a habit of mind, or a method of thought, irrespective of its particular branches. There was, indeed, no word for ‘Science’, any meaning that it could possibly bear being already sufficiently covered by the word Ingsoc.

      From the foregoing account it will be seen that in Newspeak the expression of unorthodox opinions, above a very low level, was well-nigh impossible. It was of course possible to utter heresies of a very crude kind, a species of blasphemy.

      It would have been possible, for example, to say Big Brother is ungood. But this statement, which to an orthodox ear merely conveyed a self-evident absurdity, could not have been sustained by reasoned argument, because the necessary words were not available. Ideas inimical to Ingsoc could only be entertained in a vague wordless form, and could only be named in very broad terms which lumped together and condemned whole groups of heresies without defining them in doing so. One could, in fact, only use Newspeak for unorthodox purposes by illegitimately translating some of the words back into Oldspeak. For example, All mans are equal was a possible Newspeak sentence, but only in the same sense in which All men are red-haired is a possible Oldspeak sentence.

      It did not contain a grammatical error, but it expressed a palpable untruth-i.e. that all men are of equal size, weight, or strength. The concept of political equality no longer existed, and this secondary meaning had accordingly been purged out of the word equal. In 1984, when Oldspeak was still the normal means of communication, the danger theoretically existed that in using Newspeak words one might remember their original meanings. In practice it was not difficult for any person well grounded in doublethink to avoid doing this, but within a couple of generations even the possibility of such a lapse would have vanished. A person growing up with Newspeak as his sole language would no more know that equal had once had the secondary meaning of ‘politically equal’, or that free had once meant ‘intellectually free’, than for instance, a person who had never heard of chess would be aware of the secondary meanings attaching to queen and rook. There would be many crimes and errors which it would be beyond his power to commit, simply because they were nameless and therefore unimaginable. And it was to be foreseen that with the passage of time the distinguishing characteristics of Newspeak would become more and more pronounced — its words growing fewer and fewer, their meanings more and more rigid, and the chance of putting them to improper uses always diminishing.

      When Oldspeak had been once and for all superseded, the last link with the past would have been severed. History had already been rewritten, but fragments of the literature of the past survived here and there, imperfectly censored, and so long as one retained one’s knowledge of Oldspeak it was possible to read them. In the future such fragments, even if they chanced to survive, would be unintelligible and untranslatable….

    3. bryan o'driscoll Says:

      One wonders what rational people think of a race that is persecuted by the telling of the truth? No matter how absurd this vile hoax is it must not be questioned in any way or the ‘chosen’ will feel persecuted! It is certainly true that these lying, murdering, parasitic scum would be actually persecuted if all white people everywhere became aware of the truth about them and all their crimes and hoaxes. So, no questions at all are permitted because the whole house of cards will collapse if the hoax is honestly investigated. It is remarkable that white people can think that they really live in ‘free, democratic’ societies. That Germany is a ‘free’ country and has been so since it was ‘liberated’ from those terribel Nazis. That the arrogant, sneering kike can so degrade a high civilization without any consequence to his disgusting race. Perhaps, if our race survives, future historians will note this period with amazement; maybe in the way we see the ignorant helplessness of the downtrodden peasants of the Dark Ages before the corrupt and merciless Church of Rome. The Dark Ages came to an end; the Jew Age will too.

    4. sgruber Says:

      Here is a sobering possibility: an “anti-semite” chemist or biologist or geneticist inventing a bacteriological or viral agent that targets racial jews exclusively (or as exclusively as it is scientifically possible to manage).

      Here on jewish genetic disorders:
      http://judaism.about.com/od/health/a/geneticdisorder.htm

      An agent designed or engineered to exploit such genetic weaknesses, or other features vastly more common in jews than in others, would have a devastating effect on these populations. It might be introduced as an altered influenza “bug,” slipped into a major water supply.

      It is my somber conjecture that some madman might do this. Perhaps one is working on it even now. The resulting death toll would be unsupportable. Imagine the horror of hundreds upon thousands upon millions of corpses accumulating everywhere over the span of only a few months or a year.

      Such a thing is within the realm of possibility, I think, which is why we must be cautious in our more extreme statements and opinions. We don’t want to give anyone any ideas, or inadvertantly encourage a catastrophe.

    5. Arminius Says:

      Of course Rudolf committed a crime, of course he violated other’s rights: That of the jews. Only Jews have rights, Germans never! And for this he , along with Zundel,has been extradited to Germany from the US to stand trial. Law in the so called Federal Republic of Germany is Jewish Talmudic law, Judges and prosecutors in Germany carry out orders by their jewish bosses, nothing less, on pain of instant dismissal. We all should have realized this by now.
      Therefore no Jewish criminal- or any of their corrupt henchmen- is ever brought before a court in Germany, or if that (unfortunately, because of ignorant lawyers) happens, he walks free “for lack of evidence”- because Talmudic law rules, not German law (which seems still formally to be valid- for fools).
      Defending Truth, scientific arguments-? Forget that! Jewish religion is the only truth. Holocaust is religion, therefore the truth, never to be disputed.
      But seen from another angle: What a depraved elite of Germans rules and judges the German nation! How much longer will Germans submit to their foreign occupants and
      their lies and abuses? When will they stop writing books to be burned and get guns?

    6. alex Says:

      sgruber, if you read ostrovsky, there are people doing what you describe – JEWS! trying to develop genetic weapons, or biological weapons, to combat arabs/muslims. ostrovsky claims they tested their bio-weapons in soweto, on the niggers.

    7. reads a lot Says:

      If you research the stories on weapons postulated by sgruber, one of the stories on the Israelis is that they were developing such weapons to target those with blue eyes – even World Net ran an article on this. But no, we don’t want to give madmen such horrible ideas. Unthinkable.

    8. brutus Says:

      We should thank the States Attorney and the Judge. They are making our recruitment of new adherents so much easier.

      .

    9. Celtic Warrior Says:

      I’m against burning books, but isn’t it time to use the ‘works’ of Marx, Freud et. al. as landfill?

    10. Carpenter Says:

      I remember hearing that on the radio, if you can imagine – a broadcast where they talked about Israeli attempts to develop a biological weapon that would affect only Arabs. I had just turned on the radio, couldn’t believe I was hearing it. Of course, I never heard of it again. Any other nation, and it would have been invaded within months for its Nazi racism. Imagine the Netherlands say, developing an Arabs-only biological weapon.

    11. fdtwainth Says:

      How said: the European countries are speeding back to Dark Ages! I am utterly disgusted.

    12. Dudeman Says:

      I hate to say this because it causes many people to go nuts, but the white race must remove itself from the mind-poison that is Christianity. In everyway it serves the jewish cause. Every christian reveres not only the new testament, but the old, a jewish tome that blatantly states jews are the chosen race of god! There are alternative beliefs that align with our roots.

      Christianity in all ways is detrimental to us. Love your enemy? What sort of defeatist crap is that??? Moving away from this ideological detritus will help to disintegrate the jew stranglehold on aryan minds….

    13. Mad Scientist Says:

      “. . .madman might do this. . .”

      Well, “I’m MADDER than hell and I’m not going to take it any more!”

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dib2-HBsF08
      (Howard Beale from movie Network)

    14. Ate Schwartz Says:

      “Of course Rudolf committed a crime, of course he violated other’s rights: That of the jews.”

      Apparently anything frustrating Jews from acting on whim violates their “rights”.

    15. VLC Says:

      I don’t think Lew Rockwell wrote that

    16. Lokuum Says:

      “. . . . a pseudoscientific hack-job of the vilest sort, saying that this sort of speech was “pseudojuristic browbeating” without content or definition.”

      Could one describe the established Holocaust better? The Jews are well adept at defining their motive of operation, then associating it with their enemy.

    17. Michael Mavros Says:

      Write the German embassy and tell them what you think of their laws and the disgusting state of human rights in their country. And also tell them you will never buy German products as long as this state of affairs continues.

    18. Hans Albrecht Says:

      “People of the Book” burning books — weird. Oxymoron. Duplicitous. etc., etc.. Don’t know that it’s a “Jewish” plot. More like a Fat Capitalist Institutional Nerd paroxysm, something to buffer and enhance their cache. And, of course, hopeless German guilt. “We’ll take your REPARATIONS if you persecute (and bookburn) on order”. I’m ashamed of these monkeys. At least they don’t live on my block.

    19. Hoosier Says:

      Well, New America and others, the solution is simple and obvious – forming or reforming a white nation – hence “white nationalism.”
      going from point A – where we are now, to point B, living in a white nation – gets a little tricky.

      “Where?” and “How?” are questions that come to mind. At least we’ve figured out the “Why?” and “Who will primarily stand in the way?” We’re ahead of the curve compared to most people, and at least we’ve figured out part of the puzzle.

      I do believe that the ONLY way we can succeed is on a explicitly racial basis. That HAS TO be the foundation. There’s no guarantee that it will succeed, but ANYTHING else is doomed for failure. It’s really that black and white in my mind – white nationalism, and everything else. It’s the only way.

    20. New America Says:

      in reply to Hoosier:

      Hoosier Says:
      9 December, 2006 at 1:48 pm

      Well, New America and others, the solution is simple and obvious – forming or reforming a white nation – hence “white nationalism.”
      going from point A – where we are now, to point B, living in a white nation – gets a little tricky.

      “Where?” and “How?” are questions that come to mind. At least we’ve figured out the “Why?” and “Who will primarily stand in the way?” We’re ahead of the curve compared to most people, and at least we’ve figured out part of the puzzle.

      I do believe that the ONLY way we can succeed is on a explicitly racial basis. That HAS TO be the foundation. There’s no guarantee that it will succeed, but ANYTHING else is doomed for failure. It’s really that black and white in my mind – white nationalism, and everything else. It’s the only way.

      in reply:
      I awoke this morning with a certain clarity of thought – that RACE is the ONLY substantial basis for our society, in whatever form it may take. Remember, even the First American Revolution went from 1776, to 1791…

      Peter Shank made one his astute observations – only the White RACE can handle democracy; all other races quickly learn to use the Form of democracy to mask the Substance of their true nature, which – all too often and all too quickly, as South Africa proves – comes to the surface.

      The best things we can are easy to do; if we refuse to do them with consistency, then we deserve to be cursed by our posterity.

      One, send some money to Alex Linder WITHOUT FAIL, each and every month; VNN, FTL, and Goyfire, literally change lives by showing many of us, when no one else is around, that confident new voices, educated, young, vigorous voices, are actively forming the foundational principles of our RACIAL survival, by clearly identifying our RACIAL enemy, and how the hook-nosed Satanists work on an explicitly RACIAL level to destroy us.

      In another thread I mentioned that I awoke this morning to the certain primacy of RACE as the Foundational Principle, and this is RACE, writ large, as in the Spengler and Yockean models of RACE.

      We are under consistent RACIAL attack, and are explicitly forbidden to organize constructively – repeat, CONSTUCTIVELY – along RACIAL lines; while our RACIAL enemies – the Goddamn JEWS, and their various Colored Attack Animals, not only do so, but do so with State sanction, and State financial support.

      Given where we are, we can start with consistency; Harold Covington’s models for the development of an NS Republic within the geographical limits of the United States – kind of like our version of Aztlan – is a fertile source of beginning to define issues with ever greater clarity. Much of what will be developed will be used, modified, or discarded, as we choose, individually. COLLECTIVELY, we will adopted the Idea we really want to support – an explicitly White Nationalist RACIAL Society – as the organizing principle, and everything else falls into line with that overarching conception.

      I read the pieces Lenz posts here, and while I disagree with a lot of what he says, I also use his issues to help define, and further refine, a range of possible solutions that are explicitly RACIAL, White Nationalist in conception, and National Socialist in implementation.

      Thee are designed to inspire further comment, especially among those who are not ready to comment yet, by showing them that the Creative RACE – note the use of the singular – so they can accept the hitertofore unacceptable idea that this is POSSIBLE. Once our children can accept that, they can develop their own models for implementation, consistent with the reources they have, the resources they can develop, and the situation in which they find themselves along The Way.

      Here’s something anyone can do – put some money in an envelope, wrap the money in a piece of paper so no one at the post office can be tempted, and simply send it to Alex Linder, Hal Turner, Bill White, any and/or all, depending upon your situation, with – and THIS is the key – regularity.

      I regard this as our version of what the Goddamn JEWS used to finance Israel; we don’t have the resources for the Israel Bonds gambit, but we can ALL put aside the money we spend on a cup of coffee and a damn fattening doughnut at work every day, for the sake of our children, our posterity, the very life and future of our RACE.

      And if we can’t do that, then we really do not deserve to survive.

      It’s that simple.

      The future of our RACE – the sum total investment of our Ancestors to build a better future for US is marked to market value, and, on the Day of Judgment, our grandparents, and our grandchildren, will look at us, and turn their backs.

      And rightly so.

      Let me make my position clear.

      For whatever personal flaws people may say they have, they do more good for us, on their worst day, than the rest of us have done, on our best days.

      Turner did more good for us, as a RACE, in ONE HOUR in Kingston, New York, than ALL of the Patriotards and Conservatives, and Libertarians have done in FIFTY YEARS.

      I have seen unemployed, trapped, dirty blue-collar workers realize there is Hope in their desperate situation from their listening to cd’s I burned with edited bits and pieces from Peter Shank, Goyfire, and some country music thrown in.

      So, intellectually, I am helping to define economic and social issues within the context of a new National Socialist Republic along the lines discussed in Harold Covington’s Northwest Trilogy.

      Economically, I am sending some money, in cash, each and every month, to some people who are out front, taking the hits for us, until I am in a position to stand alongside them.

      And, from time to time, I start little comments at convenience stores in the poor, White areas of town, so they stop blaming themselves, and turning their anger inward.

      Those are all a start, but the importance of consistency can not be overstated.

      And when I say “consistency,” I mean FINANCIAL consistency.

      Some time back, Linder ran what I thought was an inappropriate photograph of homosexual pornography on this site, and I was appalled.

      I suspected that this came from the realization that what “The Cause’ really needed was a handful of people who would commit to the Ideal – ACTIVELY commit to the Ideal – of White Nationalism, and would fight through the matter of Form – offensive pornography – to the matter of Substance – there are too many Free Riders who come on VNN, bitch, moan, complain, and do not contribute anything – no positive ideas, no Creative solutions, and, above all, no money.

      If, for all of our Dreams, we won’t put the equivalent of our daily coffee money and support those who are actively building the framework for the ONLY Foundation we have for our posterity, than what we are saying is, “I don’t want to be responsible as an Adult. I want to live in a fantasy world where Sky Gods like Pierce and Rockwell return, and lead us into battle. After the battle has been won, I will share in the fruits of victory.”

      In the meantime, all too often, our daughters become race-traitor whores, and our sons become whiggers – the constructive equivalent of the New Dhimmitude – because we weren’t men enough to see what was happening, and do something about it, when we could.

      Bob Whitaker made a very insightful comment when he said the self-proclaimed “Greatest Generation” would risk their lives, but not their livelihoods, for what they believed in.

      He gave the greedy bastards too much credit; two out of three were drafted, and the other one was facing a life of grinding poverty, and had seen starvation all too closely.

      They stood by when THEIR sons and daughters were “escorted” to Little Rock High School at bayonet point by the Airborne…

      They stood by when “Affirmative Action” became institutionalized; after all, the Philadelphia Plan only applied to blue collar union workers in Philadelphia, and they were tied into organized crime, weren’t they? Didn’t they really pretty much kind of deserve it, after all?

      They did not think RACIALLY, and now, their grandchildren suffer the consequences, today; I can assure you, their grandchildren will practice benign neglect, all too soon, if only because they will not be able to afford the benefits the so-called “Greatest Generation” voted for themselves…

      This post rambles a bit, but it reminds me of the total depth and breadth of the War the Goddamn JEWS have engaged us in, in which we refuse to even be remotely Aware of what they did, and how they did it.

      We MUST start where we are, and we MUST take the responsibility to BE what we want the world to BECOME.

      And, if this isn’t worth sending at least coffee money consistently to those who are doing the heavy lifting for us, then they can say they did their part.

      We won’t be able to say half as much.

      And our grandchildren, speaking Spanglish, will become the New Indentured Servants, as the one class of people all other RACES can look down upon, scorn, mock, and attack openly, at will.

      On mornings where it is cold outside, and I am a little slow to get with it, I remind myself that, by the time I have left my warm bed, my grandfather had started a fire in the stove – kindling first, of course – and then went out to harness the mules, and take care of the rest of the animals. He then worked the fields as long as he could with a brace of mules, and THAT is the very definition of hard work. My grandmother made pancakes and biscuits, from scratch, and then heated water on the wood stove to boil the family clothes, washing them with her own hands on a washboard, and then started canning food to make sure they had enough to get through the winter. This was done every day, day in, day out, for all of the days of their lives.

      They did all of this, so THEIR children would have it better than THEY did.

      Compared to our recent Ancestors, we have it easy.

      But not for long.

      New America

      An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!