16 December, 2006

‘Holocaust’: The Means by Which the Richest Group in the World Contrives to Cow and Milk the Rest of the Us in the Guise of Victims who are Persecuted and Due Eternal Restitution

Posted by alex in Alex Linder, Holocaust, holocaust racket, White vocabulary at 5:57 pm | Permanent Link

By Alex Linder

Reading through a thousand blog reactions to Duke v Blitzer on CNN, a generalization crystallizes. People confuse being told something six million times with knowing something. They are not the same. “It ain’t what you don’t know, it’s what you know that just ain’t so.” The average man ‘knows’ the Holocaust exists because: 1) everybody uses the term; 2) he has seen photos of stacked bodies; 3) he has read Anne Frank’s book; 4) authorities agree that questioning any of this is ‘hate.’ In other words, the average man believes in the Holocaust for no logical reason, but out of simple mammalian conformity.

‘Holocaust’ is a loaded, dishonest term.

You can’t debate with undefined terms without making a joke of yourself, but the average man does not realize this. It is the part of public school, reinforced by mass media, to disable his thinking so that he’s worse positioned to defend himself because he can’t understand how he is manipulated to accept the illogical.

Debate in the mass media of a democracy is nothing but the shuffling of loaded terms. ‘Holocaust’ is no ordinary noun. Rather, it is a loaded gun leveled at the head of the West and the rest. Give the jews their money and their pride of place or get your head and reputation blown off. You will notice that never, ever does debate in the captive media condescend to deconstruct the Jewish Privilege embodied in and sanctified by the designer label ‘Holocaust.’ Worship the jews and submit to their demands – that is what the term Holocaust means.

A demand for special privilege protected by a shell of pseudo-history; that is an objective description of the term. The heart of the ‘Holocaust,’ taking at face value the term’s pretension to historical designation, is the claim that six million jews were murdered by Nazi Germany, most of them by gassing. The evidence for the gassing is never discussed. Photos of crematories and bodies stacked like cord wood are shown. No context or explanation of the reason for showing them is given. The connection is to be assumed. But never is any ordinary evidence, let alone proof, of the gassing allegation advanced. That jews were gassed is treated as though it were already proved and therefore unquestionable, save by the depraved. Thus, the practical job of the media and the well intentioned everyman is to smear and ostracize anybody who argues against settled truth. We all know that jews were gassed, and that those who say otherwise are deniers driven by hate. But it ain’t so just because “everybody knows” it is.

We are told repeatedly that the ‘Holocaust’ is both the worst thing that ever happened and the best documented thing in human history. We are to take these assertions on authority, since no genuine debate is allowed.

There are men who can prove the ‘Holocaust’ is a Big Lie.

You can find them in jail.

Their jailings are scarcely mentioned in the mass media. Their jailings go unlamented by the mass columnists. To discuss these men and their work would endanger the Propasphere the media construct. They must disappear.

But we know, mass media. We know, jews. And we’re not going away. We’re getting louder and stronger. And there’s nothing you can do to stop us.


  • 11 Responses to “‘Holocaust’: The Means by Which the Richest Group in the World Contrives to Cow and Milk the Rest of the Us in the Guise of Victims who are Persecuted and Due Eternal Restitution”

    1. Curt Says:

      Linder’s article above pretty much sums it all up!

    2. Beast Says:

      Mammalian conformity. Mammal=mammary=humans feed their young breast milk.

      Mammal=boob. Boob=Boobus Americanus.

      Bunch of boobs!

    3. Beast Says:

      Actually all mammals feed their young milk. We’re so named because of our mammal-nipples. Not just humans. Humans are merely a mammal. As is a cat, or dog, or dolphin. Minor correction.

    4. Lokuum Says:

      60 minutes did a story on the violence that took place in Uganda (?) And what was the theme? Apparently some people are denying genocide took place. A coincidence or proof positive the jews coordinates their propaganda? A kinda feel sorry for the negress the story centered upon-she really thought the jew anchor was down there doing a story about her people because the jew cared.

    5. wayne h. Says:

      At least the conference in Iran brought this issue to media attention ,although in a negative way.All the media stories I’ve heard focus on denial of the holocaust and wiping Israel off the map. They do not want to call attention to freedom of speech issues or reasoned debate of an historical event.The general public is so brinwashed on this I can’t even discuss this with friends or family .I takes a lot of independent investigation and a desire to know what really happend to approach the subject and discover how the jews have twisted and lied and made this topic undbatable.I was happy to hear the president of Iran make the bold statements that he did ,to shake things up and put the jews on spot .David Duke is always decribed as a white supremist and Nazi ,But his writings are well reasoned and convincing .I guess you could say there is no such thing as bad press as it will cause some to read his work and reconsider the picture the media paints of him.

    6. Tim Says:

      Outstanding summary by Alex. If the holocaust story were rock solid then revisionists could be regarded as harmless fools to be ridiculed. The fact that they are taken deadly seriously says it all.

      Photographs of piles of typhus victims at concentration camps at the end of the WWII must have set off alarm bells in jewish heads. This was a golden propaganda opportunity for them that could not be passed up and the biggest hate hoax in history began.

      They got it off the ground by extracting many signed “confessions” from German army officers after subjecting them to starvation and torture. These “confessions” were used as “evidence” in the “trials” held at Dachau and Frankfurt-am-Main. The American Judge Edward Van Roden was one of three judges appointed to investigate alleged prisoner abuses at the Dachau trials. In 1949, he revealed the methods used by American investigators to the Washington Daily News and British newspaper, Sunday Pictorial:

      “Posturing as priests to hear confessions and give absolutions; torture with burning matches driven under the prisoner’s finger-nails; knocking out of teeth and breaking of jaws; solitary confinement and near starvation rations.” Van Roden explained that: “The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months…”
      “The investigators would put a black hood over the accused’s head and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses…. All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with out American investigators.” Some of the “American” investigators responsible had names like: Shumacker, Perl, Ellowitz, and Kirshbaum and the legal advisor to the court was Col. A. H. Rosenfeld.

      See online book “Did Six Million Really Die?” here: http://www.stormfront.org/truth_at_last/

    7. Jack Burns Says:

      I personally regard this piece as one of Alex Linder’s best yet, and all without a hint of vulgarity which I believe sometimes flaws his considerable efforts. Mr. Linder is without question one of the clearest thinking, most sincerely animated, and most talanted writers our movement has yet produced and I salute him.

    8. jackumup Says:

      The math of the mass killings is to great to make the event pausable. We don’t need to deal with the public in this matter but the private, that is where you wil get the attention needed to expose this lie.

    9. Shabbos Shabazz Says:


      A new neo-logism? A hybrid between plausible and possible?
      Or- Able to be paused- “pause-able”?

      The second sentence sounds like it emanated from Yogi Bear, Yogi Berra, or some other Mystic.

    10. Grudge Says:

      “People confuse being told something six million times with knowing something.” — That’s quotable as hell.

      After reading this trenchant article and the comments, I momentarily think, if I can just get [co-workers, friends, family members etc.] to read this, they’ll get a clue! If only … I guess people are still suckers for “authority” and somehow (and this is what doesn’t make sense) the TV and NPR and the NYT still wear that mantle.

    11. Zoroastro Says:

      Another good point for the unenlightened: what is “holocaust”, they might dare ask? Answer: It is the rock of the jewish mafia-style privilege. Blast the rock!