Debunking the Coverers-Up
Posted by alex in Letters, WTC demolition at 5:09 pm | Permanent Link
Here is a link which assails the Popular Mechanics article which is now linked on the forum, in the thread you started concerning the WTC. http://911review.com/pm/markup/index.html The site http://911review.com seems scientific and comprehensive. It addresses every issue and cites countless sources, including mainstream ones. Particularly useful for VNN, perhaps, is the “Information Warfare” section which exposes the shabby tactics used to discredit rational inquiry. It criticizes the pod-planes theory and Morgan Reynolds in the Trojan Horse subsection.
I remember, on the night after the attacks, one of the cable-news stations of a major network rebroadcast the aftermath of the collapse of the towers. A reporter came up to two black firemen and asked what happened to cause the collapse. They replied it was an explosion. The reporter pressed them, and they insisted that it was ,indeed, an explosion. No doubt they were part of a conspiracy of Creationists and Holocaust Deniers, if you believe Michael Shermer. There is more evidence to show that the WTC was blown up than there is that Scott Peterson killed his wife, and he’s on death row.
When are eyewitnesses not considered evidence at a crime scene? When there is a cover-up.