23 January, 2007

Movie Review: ‘Idiocracy’

Posted by alex in movie reviews, movies at 4:38 pm | Permanent Link

Reviewed by Cowboy Zeke

As one VNNer put it this could be the most important film of our time. “Idiocracy” is about the future of mankind which is not bright, both in terms of optimism and intellectual terms.

The story is a simple one; the stupid have come to dominate reproduction, and intelligence is no longer selected for, resulting in 500 years of dysgenic breeding. Since the stupid breed extremely fast, the world has become ovAerpopulated with people who have the average intelligence of a typical inner city black, or 10-year-old monster truck rally / wrestling fan. This of course causes problems at every level of society, what is left of technology is either destroyed, broken, or in various states of disrepair.

Truthfully the average intelligence of the people in the film made me think of the haughty violent imbecilic retards from shop class.

Bring into this world Joe, a soldier selected for a suspended animation project by the military because of his complete and total averageness in almost every test possible. The experiment goes wrong due to human error and Joe and the female participant in the experiment are sent to sleep for 500 years instead of the one year the experiment was supposed to run.

Through a twist of fate a garbage avalanche wakes up Joe and the female participant up from their cryogenic sleep. Joe finds himself in a garbage-strewn future where the whole world looks like the average dirty hovel in Mexico or Africa. Everything but the violence, vulgarity and over-the-top advertising with its ensuing consumerism has been stripped away, even the President of the United States is a big black boisterous idiot with long straight hair and a Hispanic name who is the five-time smack down champion.

Like self-important Africans who all think they are a
prince, the leading retards of this dystopia, the president and his cabinet, all wear giant gold medallions and sports leisure wear. Sportswear is now the de facto type of clothing in the future, and no clothing goes without some type of corporate advertising on it.

The president has Joe brought to the white house to solve the problems of the future, and the story goes on from there. I will avoid spoilers to allow you to enjoy the film, as you should see this film yourself. Be warned though it is in no way meant for children, and is filled with vulgarity and violence.

The most disturbing part of this film is how very possible it is. With the out-of-control black and Mexican population growth, the resistance of intelligent people to racial truths and intelligent women being unwilling to reproduce, this is a very possible future. One element which I liked a great deal was that everything had been automated so much that the retards never had to think for themselves, and had been so dumbed down that they could not fix a problem even if they could identify why it was happening. Also, the fact that in the future, corporations own everything, even governmental organizations, was quite plausible.

Things which I did not like about the film were many, and some were jewey and some had to do with the movie’s world. The first problem I had was with the beginning of the film which I am sure you have all seen, where they have the white guy as an 84 IQ redneck, and they have a jew (Patrick Fischler) with a 137 IQ married to a typical snotty career /class-oriented white woman.

The second issue I had with the film was the sheer amount of race mixing and the number of black and mestizo extras used in the film. The only reason I have less of a problem with this is because if you want to portray stupid people with no appreciation for anything but over-the-top violence used as entertainment with prepubescent simpletons as its audience, then race mixers, and non-whites, are a good choice to portray them. At the end of the film there is also a number of race-mixed children and I take offence at how they are described.

The third issue I have is how they kept referring to Einstein in many instances where genius is brought up. But that is not a can of worms to open at this time.

There are a few core points I take from “Idiocracy”:

– If you want to be a retard, act like a black, a Mexican or a patriotard;
– Intelligence is a biological trait that is passed down through genetics. (This is probably the one reason this movie was spiked above all others.);
– The ‘humor’ of Jewish filth is directed at the least common (mental) denominator, with its preoccupation with genitalia, bodily functions and excrement;
– Jewish Hollywood sees the average woman as a street walking whore.

In conclusion, this movie is extremely important, not only for white nationalists, eugenicists, and the intellectual, but for all people to see. It is one of the rare films which can mix humor with scathing social commentary of a future which is possible unless those amongst us with intelligence and concern for the future do something about it. It is my belief that this type of future will come to pass unless a world wide culling of the backward and stupid third world / stone-age people takes place through sterilization, and the most intelligent whites begin again to having large families.


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 12/31/06 Movie Review: ‘Idiocracy’ 96% similar
  3. 11/19/11 Quick Movie Review 56% similar
  4. 06/20/14 Quick Movie Review 54% similar
  5. 03/17/06 Movie Review: ‘Crash’ 53% similar
  6. 05/22/12 Quick Movie Review 52% similar
  7. 9 Responses to “Movie Review: ‘Idiocracy’”

    1. The Warlord Says:

      I rented the film and thought is was pretty good. While vulgar I didn’t notice much in the way of violence and there was no gore. What little violence I saw was typical of that on the A-Team. 500 years is way too long; it will take no more than 200 years for the US to degenerate to such a state. Even so, society would have broken down or been taken over by a superior power (China?) before that state of affairs came to pass, so it can be considered to be optimistic in that regard. Like “Soylent Green” or “Planet of the Apes” it raises an interesting idea, which elevates it out of the B movie category and should keep it alive as long as folks can still comprehend the issue of reproduction and intelligence.

      The Warlord

    2. -JC Says:

      Intelligence and Civilisation
      by Linda Miller
      from “Spearhead,” October, 1995
      “Modern comforts,” says Linda Miller, “are producing a downbreeding of our population which must be reversed”
      ‘A’ level passes this year are at an all-time high. The question being asked in the mainstream media is: Are students doing better or are the tests becoming easier?
      This question helps to disguise the real issue in the same way as these exam results disguise the same important issue. That issue is the intelligence of the population, and the fact that it is dwindling significantly with each oncoming generation.
      Everyone who is honest with themselves has noticed it. Incompetence is rife. If workmen are hired to do a job, all too often it is a botched job. The news is constantly full of examples of wasted public funds; financial calculations made by institutions or companies which have proved inaccurate; (Eurotunnel, Canary Wharf, Lloyds’ Names, for example); the shortsightedness of banks making loans to third world countries which will never be able to pay them back, no matter how many rain forests they cut down; and countless other major public fiascos.
      Teachers and lecturers complain of soaring levels of illiteracy, which cannot all be explained away by misguided and ineffective educational techniques. Each new year, admittance into secondary schools contains many more pupils than the year before who can neither read nor write and who lack basic skills in numeracy.
      University lecturers frequently find that they must attempt to teach new students the grounding in subjects which were insufficiently taught at school. The speed of the decay is gathering a rapid momentum.
      Intelligence is biological. Knowledge is the acquisition of facts, but intelligence is the biological potential to understand and to learn.
      There are huge variations in levels of intelligence between individuals within a race and between different races, communities or families. Intelligence is inherited. Because there are many genes involved in determining intelligence, it is a very delicate balance. Usually (not always, due to such factors as recessive genes and mutations) intelligent people have intelligent children and unintelligent people have unintelligent children.
      If you wanted to improve the intelligence of the next generation in Britain, you would achieve this if you successfully encouraged intelligent couples to have several children and discouraged unintelligent people from so doing. This positive eugenics would result in a more intelligent population.
      If, on the other hand, the policy were to encourage the intelligent to concentrate on careers at the expense of having children, and to lavish resources on the less intelligent, who as a rule produce the most offspring, this will result in a rapid lowering of the intelligence of the population.
      Civilisation without a eugenic policy is self-destructive. Civilisation could, with the correct eugenic policy, be a great asset to intellectual advancement; but in practice [bad eugenic policy] has always proved to be an implement for the erosion and down breeding of the population.
      No Advancement
      Almost everyone assumes that, because of the progress in technology we have now achieved, mankind today has mentally advanced from its intellectual level of a few thousand years ago. It is assumed that we have advanced genetically, but this is not the case. Certainly, the genetic characteristics of our population are continually evolving and changing. Civilisation has caused circumstances to arise in which these changes have been happening more rapidly than would otherwise have been the case. These changes have been for the worse. The present-day population is neither as intelligent, as strong of character, nor as robust as the Romans at the time of Cicero over two thousand years ago.
      We are right to be proud of the civilisation that we have produced. However, throughout all the astounding progress made in science and technology, sociological progress has not kept up with it. Scientific progress is being maintained by a dwindling minority of non-reproducing intelligent people. This rate of advancement is declining and must eventually cease when no more people of sufficient intellectual calibre are being born. There has been no progress at all in government, religion, language or social organisation.
      Astonishing as it may seem, civilisation can, in itself, be blamed for the lowering of the intelligence of the population.
      All civilisations inherently contain the seeds of their own destruction. Only a eugenic policy to safeguard against deterioration can avert this decline. It is vital to recognise the negative aspects of civilisation so that we may overcome these problems and develop the first ever civilisation which is self perpetuating.
      The solution is simple. It is a eugenic programme of improving racial quality. Civilisation saves the misfits. It is a ‘humanising’ process which sustains and subsidises the weak, the helpless, the morons, the idiots and the inadequates. These elements of the population are a burden carried by the more capable elements.
      Without civilisation to protect them, the laws of nature — `natural selection’ — would have culled these people, instead of saving them to reproduce.
      Consequently, the gene pool is flooded with the undesirable elements who breed more prolifically.
      Needs of Survival
      In civilisation there is far less impetus to use one’s own intelligence to survive. In primitive society, those who best used their wits, who had energy, who coped best, would survive and live to have children. As a result of this, our ancestors progressed slowly over hundreds of thousands of years. Eventually the population became intelligent enough to form a civilisation.
      Next, the forces which lead to the evolution of a higher intelligence became reversed. Civilisation is organised to help all members of society, including the stupid, lazy and shiftless. Therefore, these genetic defectives now survive to procreate and perpetuate their own kind, decreasing the level of intelligence in the population. Extensive research has shown that those of lower intelligence, on average, have more offspring than those of high intelligence [not to mention having a greater propensity for violence]. The unintelligent are increasing in number, while the intelligent are shrinking. Similarly, physical weaknesses are also spread.
      This tragic chain of events has doomed every civilisation that has ever existed. For some time, even while the decay is setting in, civilisation can still advance upward due to the momentum of previous inventions, systems and benefits. Eventually, as the intelligence level drops lower and lower still, the population is no longer able to continue to advance civilisation. As the intelligence level decreases further, the ability is lost even to sustain the level which previous generations had achieved. Civilisation then begins its downhill slide, and after another few hundred years, it slides into oblivion.
      So, we can know this: the population is less biologically intelligent now than in the past. If the teaching techniques and methods of assessing educational achievement remained constant and unchanged, this would be blatantly obvious. It would be demonstrated by a massive failure rate in examinations.
      If this was seen to have happened, the population (or, at least, those left with enough intelligence to become alarmed at this rapid decline) would demand that something be done to stop the down-breeding. This is why teaching techniques have been regularly changed, so that the techniques could be blamed for the inability to read, etc. Also, exams have changed. Course work is more significant in assessment than it used to be. Bad spelling is not penalised. Exams have been made easier. There are set quotas of passes which are awarded regardless of performance. The school league [boards of education] tables put pressure on schools to give the impression that they are doing well, with a high pass rate. However, no matter how these superficial factors cause a lowering of educational standards, we must recognise that the intelligence of the population can only decrease given the pressures of civilisation to increase the quantity of unintelligent children born in comparison to intelligent children.
      [And, so, there you have it:] We are caught in a downward spiral that can only be reversed by a policy of good common-sense eugenics.

    3. -JC Says:

      “The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.”
      -Friedrich Nietzsche

    4. -JC Says:

      Ostensibly White woman first joins the Air Force and then poses for Austrian Jew Heffner’s Playboy. Downbreeding shows in the intelligence of the above actions. Story here: http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2789109

      And, if you’re not convinced this woman is trash, look at her behavior here:
      http://2084615424.slide.com/p/5/Playboy+Mansion+Photos?view=large

    5. Appius Claudius Priscus Says:

      We might be culled pretty soon by nuclear war, which will be a culling comparable to the bubonic plague. With bubonic plague, people who were smart enough to guess, or at least sober enough to recognize the value of someone else’s guess, about the value of sanitation, though no one exactly formulated the “germ theory of disease” – were much likelier to survive. Likewise with nuclear war, people who carefully read and understand any simple government manual about the effects of nuclear weapons and radiation survival, though no one exactly understands how biological species interact with radiation – will be much likelier to survive.

      China boldly has demonstrated that it has hegemony in space – and will not apologize. Iran, Israel, and Russia, in secret alliance, are poised to conquer the oil patch. Itz coming.

    6. Ole H. Johansen Says:

      To JC

      Why is the women a trash?

      vikingwarrior

    7. Biff Baxter Says:

      I only despise niggers, but at this stage I will truly say I hate most whites. Sorry, can’t help it. They’re just too fuggin’ stoopid to take any pride in being attached to their genetic tree even in the distant past. I consider myself one of the last remaining Indo-Aryan genetic anachronisms because my eyes line up and I can count to ten on my fingers.

      I’m not yoking my fate to anybody headed the way of the mudskittles in IDIOCRACY, I don’t care if they are my removed cousins. I sincerely hope God drops them all in the next war and scrapes them into his heavenly dustpan. They’ll probably be too busy shopping to notice they are dead.

      Could jews have gotten this far without so many barnyard beasts to follow their bell? I think not. The yoos have done us a favor in setting our society up for a massive cull. We had a lotta dead wood in this DNA pile, let’s be honest. Time for somebody to strike a match and do a controlled burn so the whole forest stays healthy and robust.

    8. sgruber Says:

      Biff, I don’t fancy your fantasy of jews “doing us a favor” by setting massive numbers of us on fire.

    9. A Murder of Crows Says:

      This weeks small victories:
      My son got my old man to watch the movie- and
      I got my old man to listen to J. Edgar Steele (download on gold) -I figured anything about $ would be an incentive. Funny he didnt believe at first EJS was ” a real attorney”.
      It is truly weird he thinks all WNs are scrounging by, uneducated, unsuccessful ‘cartoon people’. But I am working on dispelling that myth (I think its an effect of living here in CA, even if you are basically an average Joe Schmoe).
      Ipods(any mp3 players) are great in this way , because if you cant get someone off the couch to the pc, you can bring the media to them-