One correction. Alex was wrong by saying that Wikipedia is a left-wing source. It is an online community that _anyone_ can contribute to. One case in point, how Savage Wiener had the letter inferring him engaged in homosexual activity with a black man from the 60’s with the Alan Ginsberg crowd removed from his wiki site. There you have a so called right-winger altering pages. If anything, wikipedia is a site for information, but the whole story may not be represented by it.
“One correction. Alex was wrong by saying that Wikipedia is a left-wing source. It is an online community that _anyone_ can contribute to.”
I have tried contributing articles, corrections, etc., over two years and have been repulsed and/or banned each time. Wiki is Jewish — if one bit of truth or objectivity gets by the censors, doesn’t make up for the 5-dozen that are erased in the next minute. They will say you’re “vandalizing” an article.
Don’t buy the wiki “neutral POV” lie. Anyone claiming he doesn’t have a point of view has an agenda. Wiki is a quick source of essentially neutral info, such as what language is spoken in a certain country, but beyond that you risk the usual jew fudging. And not only that, the traditionalists and occultniks are favored there as well. Go figure.
I will add Wales’s buddies include crazed Zio-nazi jewess Diana Mertz Hsieh (nee Brickell) and vicious compulsa-blogger-law school prof jew Glenn Reynolds.
The essence of Wikipedia is that people write articles for Wales free of charge, and he gets to be called a great contributor to “human knowledge.” Like Aristotle.
I tried to edit Wikipedia’s “Holocaust” article to add “One Third of the Holocaust” to the non-dead-tree bibliography. In SECONDS my edits were deleted.
2 March, 2007 at 7:27 am
SWEEEEEET!! check into the New Mexico mestizo crime omfg!
2 March, 2007 at 10:24 am
One correction. Alex was wrong by saying that Wikipedia is a left-wing source. It is an online community that _anyone_ can contribute to. One case in point, how Savage Wiener had the letter inferring him engaged in homosexual activity with a black man from the 60’s with the Alan Ginsberg crowd removed from his wiki site. There you have a so called right-winger altering pages. If anything, wikipedia is a site for information, but the whole story may not be represented by it.
2 March, 2007 at 7:01 pm
Damn that basic algebra is tough. I almost wasn’t able to leave a comment.
Well done and excellent show gents. All that nigger-hate just makes my heart sing with joy.
Excellent show! Here’s some furious applause!
3 March, 2007 at 12:53 am
It is an online community that _anyone_ can contribute to.
That’s the theory, but that’s in practice it’s just another judeo-leftist source.
3 March, 2007 at 10:18 am
“One correction. Alex was wrong by saying that Wikipedia is a left-wing source. It is an online community that _anyone_ can contribute to.”
I have tried contributing articles, corrections, etc., over two years and have been repulsed and/or banned each time. Wiki is Jewish — if one bit of truth or objectivity gets by the censors, doesn’t make up for the 5-dozen that are erased in the next minute. They will say you’re “vandalizing” an article.
Don’t buy the wiki “neutral POV” lie. Anyone claiming he doesn’t have a point of view has an agenda. Wiki is a quick source of essentially neutral info, such as what language is spoken in a certain country, but beyond that you risk the usual jew fudging. And not only that, the traditionalists and occultniks are favored there as well. Go figure.
4 March, 2007 at 3:24 pm
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Donal Wales seems damn jewish, though I don’t know any source *proving* he is.
Here’s a discussions by WN about this
http://shankradio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1820
Here’s a discussion about wikipedia bias
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=1653
Here wikipedians vote to shitcan an article on “Jewish ethnocentrism”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Jewish_ethnocentrism
I will add Wales’s buddies include crazed Zio-nazi jewess Diana Mertz Hsieh (nee Brickell) and vicious compulsa-blogger-law school prof jew Glenn Reynolds.
The essence of Wikipedia is that people write articles for Wales free of charge, and he gets to be called a great contributor to “human knowledge.” Like Aristotle.
I tried to edit Wikipedia’s “Holocaust” article to add “One Third of the Holocaust” to the non-dead-tree bibliography. In SECONDS my edits were deleted.
4 March, 2007 at 8:48 pm
The show sould be heard by every white person on the planet, it’s amazing how clear the problem is when the jew has no say.
Is that the new math?