1 March, 2007

Goyfire 49

Posted by alex in Goyfire at 9:20 am | Permanent Link
Download: GoyFire_49.mp3
Shownotes: vnnforum.com
Archive & Podcast: here

  • Similar posts:

    1. 02/22/07 Goyfire 48 Released 201% similar
    2. 01/31/07 Goyfire 47 Released 175% similar
    3. 09/15/06 Released: Goyfire #39 141% similar
    4. 12/20/06 Released: GoyFire #46 133% similar
    5. 10/25/06 Goyfire #43 Released 132% similar
    6. 7 Responses to “Goyfire 49”

      1. .308 Says:

        SWEEEEEET!! check into the New Mexico mestizo crime omfg!

      2. Dudeman Says:

        One correction. Alex was wrong by saying that Wikipedia is a left-wing source. It is an online community that _anyone_ can contribute to. One case in point, how Savage Wiener had the letter inferring him engaged in homosexual activity with a black man from the 60′s with the Alan Ginsberg crowd removed from his wiki site. There you have a so called right-winger altering pages. If anything, wikipedia is a site for information, but the whole story may not be represented by it.

      3. Beast Says:

        Damn that basic algebra is tough. I almost wasn’t able to leave a comment.

        Well done and excellent show gents. All that nigger-hate just makes my heart sing with joy.

        Excellent show! Here’s some furious applause!

      4. alex Says:

        It is an online community that _anyone_ can contribute to.

        That’s the theory, but that’s in practice it’s just another judeo-leftist source.

      5. ML Says:

        “One correction. Alex was wrong by saying that Wikipedia is a left-wing source. It is an online community that _anyone_ can contribute to.”

        I have tried contributing articles, corrections, etc., over two years and have been repulsed and/or banned each time. Wiki is Jewish — if one bit of truth or objectivity gets by the censors, doesn’t make up for the 5-dozen that are erased in the next minute. They will say you’re “vandalizing” an article.

        Don’t buy the wiki “neutral POV” lie. Anyone claiming he doesn’t have a point of view has an agenda. Wiki is a quick source of essentially neutral info, such as what language is spoken in a certain country, but beyond that you risk the usual jew fudging. And not only that, the traditionalists and occultniks are favored there as well. Go figure.

      6. sgruber Says:

        Wikipedia founder Jimmy Donal Wales seems damn jewish, though I don’t know any source *proving* he is.

        Here’s a discussions by WN about this

        Here’s a discussion about wikipedia bias

        Here wikipedians vote to shitcan an article on “Jewish ethnocentrism”

        I will add Wales’s buddies include crazed Zio-nazi jewess Diana Mertz Hsieh (nee Brickell) and vicious compulsa-blogger-law school prof jew Glenn Reynolds.

        The essence of Wikipedia is that people write articles for Wales free of charge, and he gets to be called a great contributor to “human knowledge.” Like Aristotle.

        I tried to edit Wikipedia’s “Holocaust” article to add “One Third of the Holocaust” to the non-dead-tree bibliography. In SECONDS my edits were deleted.

      7. Jackumup Says:

        The show sould be heard by every white person on the planet, it’s amazing how clear the problem is when the jew has no say.

        Is that the new math?

      Leave a Reply

      You may use the following HTML tags in your comments.

      <a abbr acronym b blockquote cite code del em i q strike strong>