14 April, 2007

On the NPD

Posted by alex in German nationalists, Germany at 3:35 am | Permanent Link

Why I am a Member of the NPD

by Constantin von Hoffmeister

The NPD (National Democratic Party of Germany) is the only progressive party in Germany. It is anti-capitalist and socialist. It rejects Marxist mumbo-jumbo but positively accepts the good aspects of the German Democratic Republic (GDR). The former manager of the NPD in Saxony, Juergen Schoen, even exclaimed (in 1998) that “the GDR was the better Germany!” (as opposed to the degenerate Federal Republic of Germany)

While the NPD does distance itself from historical National Socialism, virtually all of its organs routinely praise the Fuehrer and various aspects of his regime (some of which are worth praising). This, of course, is not the official position of the NPD. After all, it also embraces the different ideas espoused by National Revolutionaries who were always opposed to Hitler’s regime. The NPD tries to incorporate all aspects of German nationalism, including National Socialism. Even Udo Voigt (the head of the party) said so in an interview with the national conservative newspaper JUNGE FREIHEIT (Young Freedom).

The NPD is not only looking to the past for inspiration, but also towards a future that might be the product of a new theory, incorporating both elements from the right (nationalism) and left (anti-imperialism and socialism). The NPD is following the philosophy of the Third Way. Its newspaper, DEUTSCHE STIMME (German Voice), shows that it does not shy away from fundamental criticism of various policies the Third Reich pursued (for example, several articles favorably review the achievements of such illustrous enemies of NS as National Bolshevik Ernst Niekisch and Revolutionary National Socialist Otto Strasser). The NPD is definitely not a “neo-Nazi” party. On the contrary, it is truly national revolutionary in both spirit and action.

Reinhold Oberlercher, an ex-Red (famous theoretician of the 1968 student revolt) became a member of the NPD. Oberlercher calls himself a “National Marxist.” He views the Bolshevik Revolution as an Asiatic counterrevolution. Another great German nationalist theoretician is Dr. Michael Nier. He used to be a member of the SED (Socialist Unity Party) and a professor for dialectical and historical materialism at the Humboldt University in East Berlin. After the collapse of the GDR, he became a member of the NPD and tried to establish a National Bolshevik wing of the party. He was sort of successful in the beginning as the party actually tried to establish contact with the Chinese and North Korean leadership. However, reactionaries in the party crushed the National Bolshevik wing. Disappointed, Nier left the party. He still supports the NPD, though, as he views it as the only real oppositional party in Germany.

The NPD is the only party in Germany that openly advocates race realism. The DEUTSCHE STIMME often publishes articles on race theory. For example, in a recent article, it highlighted the Nordic/Germanic roots of Ancient Rome (citing the well-known racial scientist Hans F. K. Guenther).

The NPD espouses not only a nationalist ideology but also a pan-European one. It actively collaborates with nationalist and racialist organizations in Europe and the rest of the White world. The NPD wants to establish close relationships with nationalist parties in Russia. This is an extremely positive development as it cements the eternal brotherhood of Germany and Russia. The famous nationalist folk singer and member of the NPD Frank Rennicke gave two concerts in Russia (Moscow and Leningrad). Both were a smashing success, and Rennicke spent hours signing autographs for Russian fans. Also, the leader of the Russian nationalist organization PAMYAT gave a rousing speech at the DEUTSCHE STIMME Press Fest in 2004.

Unfortunately, a lot of NPD members are quite reactionary in that they stubbornly demand that Germany regain its territory according to the borders of 1937. This is a completely ridiculous demand, of course, and will never happen. I often wonder what the point in such a demand is. While Berlin is swamped with Turks and other non-desirables, and the German population is committing suicide, all these reactionaries can do is demand tiny strips of land that mean nothing in the coming Imperivm Evropa (since borders will become increasingly transparent).

For its logo, the NPD uses the German imperial colors black, white and red. Of course, these three colors are also the three ancient Aryan colors. Without the NPD, Germany has no chance of awakening from its current slumber of death. Without an awake Germany (the heart of Europe), Europe has no chance of regaining its former dignity and might.

Part II

The NPD is the only party in Germany that warns of the imminent threat that large-scale non-White immigration is posing to the integrity of the biological substance of the White race as a whole. Unlike the establishment parties, the NPD realizes that Europe is being colonized by new barbarians from the south. The Franco-German New Right philosopher Pierre Krebs regularly warns the readers of the DEUTSCHE STIMME of a very real Islamic threat.

At the DEUTSCHE STIMME Press Fest in 2006, Waffen-SS veteran and nationalist writer Herbert Schweiger gave a speech about the geopolitical necessity of a close alliance between Germany and Russia. He fervently exclaimed, “Russia needs Germany, and Germany needs Russia!” While he was giving the speech, the dumb skinheads (who, unfortunately, made up the majority of the Press Fest’s attendees) listened to a stupid concert at another stage. Some of them wore ridiculous shirts that had a map of former East Prussia on them, with slogans such as “This is the real East Germany.” If these pathetic creeps would have listened to a real National Socialist like Herbert Schweiger instead of listening to White nigger music (also known as White Power music), they might have learned a thing or two about the importance of a unified Europe instead of the unimportance of petty nationalism.

The NPD is anti-imperialist in the sense that it is opposed to the anti-White policies that AmeriKa is currently pursuing. AmeriKa’s belligerent actions are not in the interest of Europeans. The NPD romanticizes the German Reich. It describes itself as “nationalist and socialist” (which reminds one of the imperial glory of the Third Reich). It is a mistake to demand a “Europe of the fatherlands” (like the NPD does). Only Europe AS A NATION will be able to defeat the enemies of the White race. Nationalism is regressive. Nevertheless, the NPD advocates a Europe that finds its way back to its age-old traditions and myths. The idea of the German Reich is modern in the sense that it evokes the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation which in itself was the continuation of the Roman Empire and hence the legitimate incarnation of the eternal idea of Imperivm Evropa. Pan-Europeanism is progressive. The NPD needs to develop a strong imperial (as opposed to imperialist) outlook, although it is already heading in the right direction.

Other articles by Constantin von Hoffmeister can be read here

http://nationalfuturism.org/index.html


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 10/03/06 Spiegel on Germans for Germany 41% similar
  3. 03/10/10 Book Quote 36% similar
  4. 10/22/14 Book: Who Was Really Holocausted? 32% similar
  5. 04/20/10 Commemorating the Anniversary of the Birth of Adolf Hitler 30% similar
  6. 02/26/08 JAMES: The Painfully Silent Genocide Of The German People 29% similar
  7. 9 Responses to “On the NPD”

    1. Wrong Says:

      White power music is not White nigger music because if it was, the Jews wouldn’t dislike it so much and call it “hate rock”. Furthermore, the great Dr Pierce would not have supported such music via his purchase of Resistance Records.

      Further, the real leaders of our people — that being National Socialists — in Germany would NEVER compromise with jewish ideologies meaning socialism, bolshevism, Marxism, etc.

      There a few valid points made in this article; that strips of land arguments are pointless, the German-Russian friendship bridge should be strong, and that the NPD is currently the only revolutionary party with some semblance of the right direction to save our people.

      Other than that, it’s a bit much on the fantasy and lacking in reality.

    2. cygnet Says:

      Hail Constantin!

    3. Anti Says:

      a) This was written, unless I am mistaken, at least two years ago; Big Von is now felating Big Duke in Mother Roosiya — or something;
      b) The NPD (National Democratic Party of Germany) is the only progressive party in Germany.
      – Fact: In the Bundestagwahl (federal election) of 1969, in then West Germany, the NPD polled 4.3%
      – Fact: Almost forty years later, in the 2005 election, it polled a meager 1.6%
      c) It rejects Marxist mumbo-jumbo, while relying on the same kind of “socially conscious” mumbo-jumbo as Marxists;
      d) and left (anti-imperialism and socialism)
      – Fact: The penis shrinks when exposed to cold water; German ideology shrinks when exposed to stronger foreign powers, but calls itself “anti-imperialism”, as though any German nationalist is really at ease over the Polish border;
      e) for example, several articles favorably review the achievements of such illustrous enemies of NS as National Bolshevik Ernst Niekisch and Revolutionary National Socialist Otto Strasser
      – And this precisely illustrates its impotence and ideological bankruptcy: Niekisch, a known collaborator of jew Georg Lukacs, rather than proving the NPD’s superior viewpoint, rather proves its makeshift, weaker position, which grasps at straws to gather credibility;
      f) The NPD is definitely not a “neo-Nazi” party.
      – Correct. For that, its followers would have to possess an understanding of National Socialism. In reality, one would be fortunate to find, say, three members of the whole organization who could tell you point #1 of the NSDAP’s 25-Point Program; and yet, somehow, the NPD draws on “National Socialism”;
      g) He views the Bolshevik Revolution as an Asiatic counterrevolution.
      – Counterrevolution against what? some imagined “national bolshevist” revolution that just, oh the tragedy, didn’t have time to gestate and come to power, but will now sweep Evrasia thanks to the efforts of Sunic and occultnik Dugin?
      h) He was sort of successful in the beginning as the party actually tried to establish contact with the Chinese and North Korean leadership.
      – So what? what is that “contact” worth? Unless they had planned to funnel weapons into Germany (and the jury’s out on whether a “National Bolshevik” government in Germany, though appropriately kitsch, would be worthwhile), it’s just playing at international politics — but that is precisely what European nationalist enjoy most;
      i) For example, in a recent article, it highlighted the Nordic/Germanic roots of Ancient Rome
      – And is wrong, like every other impudent, shallow, self-important nordophile who beats that dead horse, to lay claim to a civilization they had absolutely nothing to do with; but hey, Big Von never been to Rome, probably not even northern Italy, and neither has any member of the NPD — Germans aren’t interested in ancient Rome anymore than they’re interested in the Thirty Years’ War, they just like imagining their ancestors were somehow responsible for it, and any old platitude will suffice to keep that myth going among them;
      j) The NPD espouses not only a nationalist ideology but also a pan-European one.
      – Even though it doesn’t allow the Italians ancient Rome, right? German ideology today is as two-faced and shallow as it was under Stresemann: they stroke Serbians and even Poles with their left hand, while the same old serpentine right hand of the covetous German clenches and reclenches, while he curses under his breath, in a language which no one else understands, about “Polacken” and “Erst Deutschland, dann Europa!” — the only thing more cynical than German nationalism’s “pan-Europeanism” is the Jews’ humanism;
      k) This is an extremely positive development as it cements the eternal brotherhood of Germany and Russia.
      – Hollow phrasework, same as in the Kaiser’s day; krauts specialize in this sort of high-minded, “iron” talk;
      l) Rennicke spent hours signing autographs for Russian fans.
      – Then Herr Rennicke is a bigger doof than he looks; what do Russians have to do with anything Rennicke sang about? does Big Von know of any russophilic statements in Rennicke’s body of work? I certainly don’t, and I wasted at least a year listening to Rennicke — before I learned German better and realized that German nationalist has absolutely nothing to do with anyone, anything, anywhere, but Germans themselves, and every lyric, every article, every interview and pressefest and concert reiterates this to the German nationalist mind; no one should imagine they’re reformed, French-loving pan-White hippies; they may pretend, but as I always say, just try talking to a German nationalist about German politics — see how warm your reception is;
      m) Unfortunately, a lot of NPD members are quite reactionary in that they stubbornly demand that Germany regain its territory according to the borders of 1937.
      – Theeereee we go: Big Von really can’t deny that every kraut, in his heart, only wants to hand the Poles their asses back to them; this is indeed reactionary, but it’s rank idealism to claim there is this “progressive” body of “good German nationalists” who conform to the pan-White scene — bullshit, and again bullshit: what any German nationalist wants, besides drinking and being belligerent or pretending they’re Norse Gods, is to chastise Poland for its “theft” of “Schlesien, uns von Gott gegeben”; any German nationalist who says otherwise is a two-faced homo;
      n) This is a completely ridiculous demand, of course, and will never happen. I often wonder what the point in such a demand is.
      – Me too. But then, I also wonder what the point of Russians giving speeches at an NPD rally is!
      o) all these reactionaries can do is demand tiny strips of land that mean nothing in the coming Imperivm Evropa
      – Mark that, now: Big Von creams his panties over Yockey’s “Imperium” (not the historical Holy Roman Empire, that’s dead & gone, but it isn’t pointless or absurd to claim that another “Imperium” will arise), which he is sure is coming, yet lambasts “reactionary”, bad German nationalists for still just wanting their slice of the Polish pie — which do you think is more likely? The truth is neither; both are moot; both are idle fantasies of two classes of idealist: the high-flown romanticism of the “neofolk” daydreamer and the slightly retarded, belligerent territorialism of the man in the street;
      p) For its logo, the NPD uses the German imperial colors black, white and red. Of course, these three colors are also the three ancient Aryan colors.
      – No, not “of course”. According to George Dumezil, a French theorist, certain colors were associated with classes in certain old Aryan societies; there is no “of course” and the use of the Imperial colors is not a secret nod to this alleged, trendy color scheme;
      q) Without the NPD, Germany has no chance of awakening from its current slumber of death.
      – A year later, Big Von had quit Germany, and taken to enthusing Linder over the notion of Aryan colonization of the moon; I trust no one remembers that sketch comedy…
      r) Without an awake Germany (the heart of Europe), Europe has no chance of regaining its former dignity and might.
      – The kraut tips his hand: without Germany, Europe is nothing.
      s) only party in Germany that warns of the imminent threat that large-scale non-White immigration
      – The DVU has done the same. The NPD routinely taps the DVU voter-base to swell its inevitably meager showings to a step beyond meager.
      t) Unlike the establishment parties, the NPD realizes that Europe is being colonized by new barbarians from the south.
      – ALL PARTIES IN A PARLIAMENT ARE ESTABLISHMENT PARTIES. ALL PARTIES IN A PARLIAMENT REPRESENT A STATUS QUO. NO PARTY IN ANY PARLIAMENT TODAY IS REVOLUTIONARY. PARLIAMENT AND REVOLUTION CANCEL EACH OTHER OUT.
      u) the geopolitical necessity of a close alliance between Germany and Russia.
      – That word “geopolitical”, that one wee word, is just what got Hitler embroiled in a conflict he couldn’t win — with Hess, that resplendent hero of all Europe and Aryan mankind (I always wonder if I have the right Hess in mind), hissing into Adi’s ear the bullshitting of Haushofer, the same bullshit drang-nach-osten that has enriched and poisoned German life for centuries upon centuries; and here it is again, this time turned on its head to mean just the opposite of what was intended;
      v) Forgot this gem: the NPD realizes that Europe is being colonized by new barbarians from the south
      – Um….”new barbarians”? what does that mean? when was Europe colonized by barbarians from the south? do you mean Arabs in Spain? No, I think you meant to cover up the colonization of Roman lands by barbarians from the north;
      w) While he was giving the speech, the dumb skinheads (who, unfortunately, made up the majority of the Press Fest’s attendees)
      – Now, were those mere attendees, or NPD supporters/members? Big Von deceives the reader; but he does at least indicate that German nationalism is for the most part skinheadsm;
      x) Some of them wore ridiculous shirts that had a map of former East Prussia on them, with slogans such as “This is the real East Germany.”
      – Here he describes, oh, 80% of German “nationalists”. The truth is, it’s become a scene for these young men — it’s shirts and bands and websites; nothing more. Who’s to blame? the bands? the kids? or the mealy-mouthed makeshift ideologues of the NPD and the ambiguities of Germany’s long-standing, quasi-leftist “conspiracy” ideology? who’s to blame — Jens Pühse or promoters of the ambiguous anti-Hitlerian Jew-collaborator (ARPLAN with Niekisch and Lukacs), Ernst Jünger?
      y) If these pathetic creeps would have listened to a real National Socialist like Herbert Schweiger
      – One must not leave unnoticed the pathetic, creepy sacralization of these wrinkly SS veterans. They’re angels, these guys. They’re “real” NS, though no well-known NS politico was an SS officer, etc.;
      z) they might have learned a thing or two about the importance of a unified Europe instead of the unimportance of petty nationalism.
      – “Unity” preaching is about as fruitful and dignified as begging rich chicks to go to bed with you.

      Having run out of letters, I here end my analysis. All nationalism today is petty, be it local or “pan”; it’s all the same flaccid toadyism. Hoffmeister has realized this himself, and that’s why he fled to Roosiya with the other Ivan-loving cunts.

    4. Constantin von Hoffmeister Says:

      @ Anti: You are mistaken. I wrote this piece last month.

      Constantin

    5. Anti Says:

      Well, whatever. It’s still fatuous and idiotic, like everything you write.

    6. unbeirrbar Says:

      German nationalism will always have a “left” inclination out of historical reasons and current realities:

      1) Germany was the birthplace of the first NS movement. NS can be summed up as a left-wing nationalist ideology.

      2) Part of the population experienced 50 years of “communist” rule under the GDR and many do view the times back then favorably.

      That German nationalism has its biggest supporters from the above-mentioned areas additionaly compels any movement or party which wishes to not lose its support-base to look objectively at the issues of marxism ,socialism ,communism and the historical “communism” in form of the GDR and the Soviet Union.

      On top of that everybody can see what the heritage of the GDR and the FRG has been and can compare it. While west-Germany is as multicultural and morally weak as the western world in general ,east-Germany is homogenous and its inhabitans harbor not seldomly outright racist worldviews.

      3) Capitalism ,increasingly since 1989, seeks even greater profits on the world market and uses more than in the past ,international resources (material as well as humans) to exploit. In short : capitalism today has demasked itsself to the workers of the western world as outright internationalistic and cosmopolitan more than ever before. By doing so it has destroyed many of the social achievements of the western worker (welfare state ,secure and good paying jobs ,free of charge healthcare and education and so on). A movement which wants to reach the masses (working people) has to take an anti-capitalist or at the very least a critical view on todays capitalism.

      4) The NPD itself has explained over and over again that its a party which wants to embrace all kinds of german nationalists. Be it national-conservatives or on the other extreme NS , National-Bolschevik or National-Marxist. As such since it doesnt shut the door on any particular brand of nationalism its policies will eventually reflect the beliefs of the majority of its members. And the majority of nationalist Germans ,to oversimplify, do indeed have a very critical view on capitalism.

    7. jigaboos j. jigabooze Says:

      What is definition of capitalism?

    8. unbeirrbar Says:

      Capitalists are the people who own the means to produce wealth. Wealth is defined as useful commodities humans need for the satisfaction of their real and artificial needs (hamburgers ,cars ,playstations).

      In this case the capitalist is the one who owns the factory ,the machines and the research centers (means of production) which are needed to produce the playstation for example.

      The proletariat are the skilled as well as unskilled workers who because they dont own means of production are forced to sell their workforce to the capitalist in order to satisfy their needs.

      The capitalist will try to keep the costs (wages he has to pay to the proletariat) of his production as low as possible. This he does by:

      1) Having access to as many workers around as possible. Through:

      a) Open borders and immigration.

      b) Technological advancment on the world-wide communication and transportation system in order to have access to the workers of foreign countries too (globalization).

      2) Technological advancement on the field of production. Namely to replace as much human work as possible by machines.

    9. greywolf Says:

      capitalism deffinition: MAKING MONEY FROM MONEY , INTEREST , INVESTING, ETC…. THERE IS NO PRODUCT! ITS THE ART OF TURNING 1 DOLLAR INTO TWO DOLLARS WITH NO PRODUCT, IN OTHER WORDS A HUGE PONZI SCHEME THAT OPERATES ON RUMOURS.