I loved the comments on this article. Hammering out the jew one article at a time. It does my heart good to see these ratz squirm. Oy, the anti-semites were out in full force!!
Organized jewry uses its power to cancel a speech about the power of the organized jewry. Move along lemmings, there’s nothing to see here, and if you DID see something that makes you go “hmmm”, it’s probably because you’re a filthy anti-semite.
The heading refers to a “canceled speech”. It might be obvious, but I missed a reference to anything canceled. The link is the Mearsheimer/Walt debate last year.
Thanks though, for the reminder about our allies, Mearsheimer and Walt. We are always short on prestigious personalities to showcase when we are selling our fact laden position to the TV indocrinated.
Yes, the comments about this article are excellent, but I’m sure they’ll soon be deleted. But that’s not as damaging as it could be, because those thoughts are being expressed in many different venues these days. The days of judeo-editors controlling the discussions are over. I remember a local talk radio host, pre-internet, describing the hoops he had to jump through to get a letter-to-the-editor published in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, and looking back it’s almost shocking to recall the unmitigated arrogance of those sons-of-bitches, and the iron fist they used to use to keep the people from having a voice. Damn, I love watching the old media die!
How long before “uncomfortable”-speech laws are legislated? Surely nobody would deny that “uncomfortable”-speech could lead to “hate”-speech which could lead another “holocaust”? What TV viewer would not support legislation that puts an end to “hate”-speech before it could be spoken?
Send letters, packages, review copies and donations to:
12 August, 2007 at 11:49 pm
I loved the comments on this article. Hammering out the jew one article at a time. It does my heart good to see these ratz squirm. Oy, the anti-semites were out in full force!!
13 August, 2007 at 5:17 am
Organized jewry uses its power to cancel a speech about the power of the organized jewry. Move along lemmings, there’s nothing to see here, and if you DID see something that makes you go “hmmm”, it’s probably because you’re a filthy anti-semite.
13 August, 2007 at 6:07 am
The heading refers to a “canceled speech”. It might be obvious, but I missed a reference to anything canceled. The link is the Mearsheimer/Walt debate last year.
Thanks though, for the reminder about our allies, Mearsheimer and Walt. We are always short on prestigious personalities to showcase when we are selling our fact laden position to the TV indocrinated.
13 August, 2007 at 6:42 am
Yes, the comments about this article are excellent, but I’m sure they’ll soon be deleted. But that’s not as damaging as it could be, because those thoughts are being expressed in many different venues these days. The days of judeo-editors controlling the discussions are over. I remember a local talk radio host, pre-internet, describing the hoops he had to jump through to get a letter-to-the-editor published in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, and looking back it’s almost shocking to recall the unmitigated arrogance of those sons-of-bitches, and the iron fist they used to use to keep the people from having a voice. Damn, I love watching the old media die!
13 August, 2007 at 3:03 pm
OK, the link at the head of the post is the link to the original Mearsheimer/Walt paper from last year.
The following is the link related to the new flap regarding the kikes muzzling an upcoming Chicago speech by them:
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2007/08/07/speechless-in-chicago/
Also, a current discussion in the VNN forum has this and other links. Mystery solved.
14 August, 2007 at 12:10 am
How long before “uncomfortable”-speech laws are legislated? Surely nobody would deny that “uncomfortable”-speech could lead to “hate”-speech which could lead another “holocaust”? What TV viewer would not support legislation that puts an end to “hate”-speech before it could be spoken?