11 August, 2007

Media Agreed to Less Coverage of Kalamazoo Rally?

Posted by Socrates in media, rallies, Socrates at 12:51 am | Permanent Link

[Article]. More: [Here]


  • 2 Responses to “Media Agreed to Less Coverage of Kalamazoo Rally?”

    1. Filles du Roi's Boi Says:

      What could be more ridiculous than these jewish media whores pretending to be concerned about their credibility, especially in an article that deliberately distorts Linder’s arrest record? Cover-ups and blackouts are what they do for a living. From the jew’s dominance of Soviet communism and the subsequent mass murder of White Christians, to the history of WWII, to the Israeli abuse of Palestinians, to the horrors of forced integration, to the monstrous atrocities being committed by South African and Rhodesian blacks, to the jew’s role in getting us into war in Iraq, to the influence of the Israeli lobby, to the global warming BS, these insects either lie about, or distort, or hide, the facts about every important issue of our time. The old media can’t die soon enough.

    2. Glenn Miller Says:

      Hell, even the cops admitted they worked hand-in-hand with the media to censor us:

      (quote)

      Taylor credits the success of the event to the cooperation of the media leading up to it. “I’d like to commend the media for agreeing not to have major pre-event coverage. It helped to keep the event under control,” Taylor said.

      (unquote)

      I’ll translate his last sentence: “It helped to prevent the niggers from having an excuse to burn, riot, loot and rape.”