Vanguard News Network

‘the new model army’ was the name given to Cromwell’s “round-heads” (also called: ‘the Parliamentary Army’, i think!) apropos Charles I’s “cavaliers”…..comes from living in a predominantly Anglo’ nation, formerly prt of the Brit’ Empire, m8!…

Useful, easy to use tool for Linder:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=OtB6_D_toVQ

Useful book for Rabbi Taperstein – solution to his bowel problem!

http://www.alittleleaven.com/

More to follow.

THIS is what WN has needed; like Pierce, defining the terms on OUR terms.

New America

An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!

Your insistence on partiinost as the origin of political correctness is basically wrong. It may be that loyalty to the Soviet line expressed itself in terms shared by leftism today – this would have to be demonstrated, of course – but that would be only topical. Partiinost means nothing more than what it says (party + ness [nost]), and apart from having been a mere survival strategy under the regime, is genetically dead. Socially it is no different from compulsory expressions of loyalty and mimicry under the rule of any other regime. Parteischaft had the same survival value, though circumstances were much less dire for party members. In any case, one shouldn’t take these refugees from the Soviet bloc too seriously; political correctness has its roots in American sociology and cultural anthropology, at most in the ascendancy of Red Diaper Babies and New York Trotskyites, who, however, defined themselves against Soviet orthodoxy. Political correctness isn’t “Soviet”, we’re not fighting “Marxism” or “Bolshevism”, Rockwell is dead and the 50’s are long gone. You’re on the wrong track: bottom line. It’s a shame you’ve jumped on the anti-Soviet bandwagon – even giving your show a Russian name – instead of digging further back into American precedents for leftist ideology. It may be a nice analogy – the American social climate resembles the Soviet, etc. – but is no more than that. Pure folly to believe there is a genetic link between the two.

Well hey — if it isn’t the spawn of Weishaupt, the Commies or the Freemasons, it’s gotta be them damn dagos!

…Right?

(cont’d)

small distinction from dusty Russian history – but a FUNDAMENTAL contrast: insane idealism vs. realism. (Lies-insisted-on-as-real vs. the actually real. Politically correct vs. factually correct. Etc.) It’s pointed since most of these neokahns are merely commies in different skins.

in reply to i Say:

you wrote:
Your insistence on partiinost as the origin of political correctness is basically wrong. It may be that loyalty to the Soviet line expressed itself in terms shared by leftism today – this would have to be demonstrated, of course – but that would be only topical. Partiinost means nothing more than what it says (party + ness [nost]), and apart from having been a mere survival strategy under the regime, is genetically dead. Socially it is no different from compulsory expressions of loyalty and mimicry under the rule of any other regime. Parteischaft had the same survival value, though circumstances were much less dire for party members. In any case, one shouldn’t take these refugees from the Soviet bloc too seriously; political correctness has its roots in American sociology and cultural anthropology, at most in the ascendancy of Red Diaper Babies and New York Trotskyites, who, however, defined themselves against Soviet orthodoxy.

in reply:
The exact phrase, political correctness, was used by Lenin, and was the hallmark of the educational platform of demonic Jew-controlled “Soviet” Russia.

They share his Spirit, at the Racial level.

i Says wrote:
Political correctness isn’t “Soviet”, we’re not fighting “Marxism” or “Bolshevism”, Rockwell is dead and the 50’s are long gone. You’re on the wrong track: bottom line. It’s a shame you’ve jumped on the anti-Soviet bandwagon – even giving your show a Russian name – instead of digging further back into American precedents for leftist ideology. It may be a nice analogy – the American social climate resembles the Soviet, etc. – but is no more than that. Pure folly to believe there is a genetic link between the two.

in reply:
“Soviet” isn’t really the proper term; remember, that term, in practice, is a Jewish creation, and was a verbal symbol of an organization that claimed to be under the control of “the workers”; in fact, of course, it was under the control of the demonic Jews.

This will change.

New America

An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!

Great education work Alex! Now if we can only get this stuff piped into the pubic shuls, right?

I studied Gramsci’s “Long March Through The Institutions” over 20 years ago, and saw this happening at universities and bureaucracies. At the time I wasn’t jeware and thought it was all about “marxists”, etc. Of late I’ve seen the “common denominator” these marchers all seem to share: all all escapees from the kikery. Who let the jooooz out???

The frosting on the educational cake was, for me, when you explained that even 700+ years ago, when the euro-kikes were trying to figure out how to deal with getting kicked out of wherever they were, their sanhedrin council recommended the strategy of “playing possum” and infiltrating all the institutional power spots. Sounds like Gramsci was NOT the originator of this idea after all! They’ve been marching through the institutions for hundreds of years, all the while in Aryan drag.

Nothing new to folk here, but good to get more confirmation. How about having a VNN sub-site called Istina University. Nah, somehow I don’t think “they” will credential this ed. institution! But, hey, “We don’t need no stinkin’ diplomas” anyway … just the truth!

Don’t forget the Roman Catholic church during this era was killing people who translated the New Testament into English.

Cromwell said something to the effect, that the only way there would be a Catholic restoration in England, would be over his dead body.

the jews were prominently positioned on both sides! of the ‘religious dispute’; re: catholic/protestant; their aim then, as it is now, was to destroy the White Race; Hitler saw through this and, wisely, never overtly associated National Socialism with Roman Catholicism or Protestanism/Lutherans!

Klassen also correctly identified ‘religious bigotry’ as one of the three areas (along with: ‘petty nationalism’ & ‘class war-fare'[and its sub-set: ‘feminism’!]) where the jew focusses his attack on Aryans!

Dutch — the doctrine of papal infallibility wasn’t promulgated until 1870ish.

It would be a mistake to say that everything Cromwell did was wrong, but it would also be a mistake to say nothing was. We must learn to have the confidence to look at these questions from all sides. This is what we can learn from Alex.

I’ve had my say. You get the last word.

‘socrates’….yr ‘censoring’ my fckn comments here agin’!

WTF’s yr prblm?

Not sure if I should ask, but we haven’t heard from you in a while. Is everything okay?

Hope that you and your family are well. Mary