10 October, 2007

Letters Between Eric Thomson and Revilo Oliver (1993-1994)

Posted by alex in Eric Thomson, Revilo P. Oliver at 5:16 pm | Permanent Link

21 January 1993

Revilo Pendleton Oliver
701 Ohio Street
Urbana, Illinois
61801

Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington  98907

Dear Mr. Thomson:

Thank you for your letter of 23 December and the picture of the very old trolley car that now operates on the Yakima Railroad as a tourist attraction, in place of the more modern equipment that I remember.

You may wonder at the delay in sending you a copy of Hilberg’s 1961 edition. The library borrowed a copy for me, but while I assumed the delay was caused by the confusion that accompanies celebration of Yule and the New Year, what happened was that I was not told the copy had been received, and, again without informing me, the book was returned on the supposition that I no longer wanted it. A copy is now being obtained for me by a responsible librarian, and should arrive within a few days.

In the meantime, Covington’s latest outburst had reached me and I send you a photocopy.

He seems to be nearing insanity. It is prima facie incredible that Dr. Pierce would spend money that he doesn’t have (he cannot afford to print some books he commissioned) to buy a second ashram in a region in which the local populace, soused in Baptist piety, is violently hostile. He could not operate two, more than a hundred miles apart over difficult roads, and he could sell neither to another cult. Since Dr. Pierce has not gone mad, I assume that the man who is trying so hard to break up the National Alliance has done so.

I have a letter from a good friend who attended Carto’s Revisionist Conference. He wrote:

I was disgusted and almost nauseated after the banquet meal at the last conference to hear Zundel via a telephone hook-up slobber praise all over Cole and state that the Chosen People had suffered almost as much as the Germans because of the false holocaust myth.

After the banquet, I was beset by a number of people who apparently read the expression on my face and were indignant at my belief that it is unwise to take into positions of authority people like David Cole.

Alas, for our rotting race!  The Christian virus has done its work irremediably. I am reminded of the English imbecile who, as reported in Spearhead, proclaimed that he forgave the nigger who raped and mutilated his daughter and would pray for the unfortunate sinner. Our race contains cancerous growths that should be excised to preserve what is yet capable of life — if there is any!

The penury of the ‘right wing’ is painful to contemplate. I deeply regret that you must live by the kind of employment you seek in Yakima, but I sincerely hope that by this time you have found something suitable.

With all good wishes,

As ever,

Revilo P. Oliver

.
.
.

1 February 1993

Revilo Pendleton Oliver
701 Ohio Street
Urbana, Illinois
61801

Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington  98907

Dear Mr. Thomson:

Herewith photocopies of the title-page, pages 177 f., and the Postscript in the edition of Hilsberg’s book that I am returning to the library. As I told you on the telephone, I shall try to obtain a copy of the 1961 edition to copy for you.

I write at once to tell you that, to my amazement, Dr. Pierce actually has purchased and taken title to Klassen’s establishment in Otto. I was wrong about his not being mad! The purchase price is not stated, so it is possible that Pierce paid less than the amount stated by Covington, and Covington is certainly a liar when he implies that Klassen had to leave the state of North Carolina: he is still living near Otto.

With all good wishes,

Sincerely,

Revilo Oliver

P.S. Your packet, including a copy of your novel, has just arrived. I thank you for it and shall read it with great interest. Its date, at all events, will enable me to mention it before Pierce’s books.

Thank you for the copy of Cardiff’s The Liberal, which mentions both “M. Murray” (i.e., Madalyn O’Hair) and James Hervey Johnson, the editor and publisher of the Truth Seeker, the periodical you have in mind in the postscript to your letter. I enclose a photocopy of an article in Liberty Bell, August 1989, in which I outline the essentials of the matter (I copy the page-proofs rather than the pages of the magazine because the typesetting equipment then in use, having behaved decorously for the first twenty-two pages, went berserk, creating many typographical errors that had to be corrected in the next issue.). I add a few marginalia to expand statements in the article.

1. Smith published this edition at my recommendation.

2. Mrs. O’Hair deserves credit for her courageous promotion of atheism, and I accordingly spared her in this paragraph. She originally quarrelled with Johnson because he was selling certain books at a lower price than she asked. It was she, to whom Charles Smith had twice given a complimentary share of stock, who started all the trouble, her palms itching when she heard of $17,000,000 and her brain becoming feverish. It was she who organized the asinine “stockholders’ meeting” and prosecution of Johnson. So her feckless cupidity is the real cause of the disaster that followed. 

3. The litigation, with countersuits, has finally ended with a published apology by Mrs. O’Hair to the crooked banker named True, who became executor and trustee under Johnson’s ill-advised will. True is said to be a Latter Day Saint, so you can guess how fitted he is to promote atheism. At present, Dr. Robert John is contemplating legal action to have True removed as trustee on the grounds that he is both incompetent and dishonest.

4. Mrs. O’Hair’s “Truth Seeker” ceased publication soon after I wrote. The rival publication from San Diego became a quarterly, operated by an odd crew, most of them at odds with each other. There was one excellent issue, which I noticed and commended in Liberty Bell, October 1989; it contained sound articles on the sexual mutilation of males by savages and barbarians, including the Sheenies, and even proposed legislation, like the Emperor Hadrian’s, to outlaw the disgusting practice. Whether the Kikes reacted, I do not know, but the journal soon relapsed into muddled “freethinking.” One issue promoted coenogamy (i.e., a kibbutz-style marriage in which a number of males pool their wives), but did not know the English word and so invented a repulsive neologism, ‘polyfidelism.’ It soon fulfilled my prediction later in this article that it would compromise with “New Age” chicanery. I have not received an issue of this bastard Truth Seeker for several months; it may have ceased publication.

5. The target here is again Mrs. O’Hair, who encourages her followers to waste their resources on such silly lawsuits as the ones here described, and wastes the funds of her own organization in such legal absurdities as a suit to compell the city of Austin to discard its purely decorative armorial bearings (the coat of arms of one of the Spanish conquistadores) because they include a cross.

Apropos of Cardiff’s article on Lincoln, I remark that in my youth I was acquainted with a man who, as a reporter for a newspaper in Ohio, covered Lincoln’s second inaugural. He was seventeen at the time, and his post as a featured journalist may have been related to the circumstance that his father owned the newspaper.

P.P.S. I wrote the above on the first, but did not get it printed and in the mail until today, the sixth.

R.P.

.
.
.

15 April 1993

Revilo Pendleton Oliver

701 Ohio Street

Urbana, Illinois

61801

Mr. Eric Thomson

P.O. Box 896

Yakima, Washington  98907

Dear Mr. Thomson:

Do not suppose that I have forgotten you, although it took the only article in the April issue of Liberty Bell that was worth publishing to remind me of an outstanding obligation. Your article on miscegenation was excellent and an able conspectus of the genetic weakness that dooms nations to self-destruction.

A little more than a month ago, one of the book-dealers of whom I had inquired reported that he had obtained a copy of the first edition of Hilberg’s book, so I ordered it immediately and told the librarian she need not prosecute her search for a copy to borrow. The dealer’s order blank said “allow three to four weeks for delivery,” so I assumed the book would come within that time and that I needed to do nothing more until I mailed it to you.

The book hasn’t come and my checque has not been negotiated. I am writing to ascertain what is wrong, and want in the meantime to assure you that I shall keep my promise to you eventually.

I must confess that numerous and various chores and my own debility have thus far prevented me from reading your novel, but it is on a shelf adjacent to this computer and I will take it up as soon as I can.

With all good wishes,

Sincerely,

Revilo Oliver

.
.
.

10 May 1993

Revilo Pendleton Oliver

701 Ohio Street

Urbana, Illinois

61801

Mr. Eric Thomson

P.O. Box 896

Yakima, Washington  98907

Dear Mr. Thomson:

The book has finally come, having spent three weeks in the custody of the post office, and I will send it on to you by insured parcels post.

Despite the dealer’s listing of it as the “first edition,” this copy is the 1967 edition, which you, on the basis of the photocopies I sent you, thought you could use, despite the “minor changes” mentioned in the notice of copyright. I accordingly accepted it. The pages are evidently the same as in 1961, and if you suspect significant “minor changes” at any point, we can find a library that has the original printing and obtain photocopies of those pages.

I wonder whether an effort has been made to suppress the early editions. They must have been printed in large numbers, but seem to have become rare now. Since I ordered this copy, I received an offer from another dealer of a copy of the first edition (1961) for $175.

I write in haste. You have, I am sure, understood the significance of the fiendish murders in Waco carried out by the army of professional terrorists whom the stupid taxpayers pay to make a Gulag out of the country they did not have the brains to keep. One has to marvel at the courage and devotion of Christians who really believe their nonsense.

With all good wishes,

Sincerely,

R.P.

.
.
.

27 July 1993

Revilo Pendleton Oliver

701 Ohio Street

Urbana, Illinois

61801

Mr. Eric Thomson

P.O. Box 896

Yakima, Washington  98907

Dear Mr. Thomson:

Somewhere in the mounds of unanswered correspondence on my side table is a letter from you that I have long intended to answer, but cannot find at the moment.

I remember that I intended, first, to assure you that the copy of Hilberg’s tripe is yours: I obtained it for you, and am glad that it is what you wanted. Second, I wanted to send you the enclosed photocopy from Dr. Pierce’s Bulletin of last December. I made the copy for you, but evidently forgot to send it earlier. It shows both his reaction to Covington’s attacks and his current wife, who came from Hungary. She does not look Jewish to my unpracticed eye.

I will tell you in confidence, since you seem to be almost unique in the “right-wing” and have discretion, that, quite apart from Covington’s scurrilous exercises in crude loedorography, I regard Williams as probably something of an imposter. Look at the photograph of him and ask yourself whether that man could have been a captain in the (presumably American) Special Forces celebrated by Colonel Gritz. Covington has distributed widely copies of a letter Williams wrote about him. It is childish, worthy of a boy in high school. I would question its authenticity, if Williams has not written as an equally immature adolescent to George Dietz.

The enclosed photocopy from a periodical called The Humanist will amuse you.

You will not have overlooked the significance of the Federal terrorists’ massacre in Waco, Texas. I wrote last month’s “Postscript” about it that will appear in the September issue of Liberty Bell. The only significant bit of information that has appeared since I wrote is the report shown on the enclosed photocopy of a page from a financial periodical, which merely confirms my prediction that Waco was but the beginning of open terrorism by the Occupation Government in Washington. The unwomanly female called Reno, head of the “Justice Department,” has now openly indicated a willingness to massacre every group of Americans who imagine that they still have rights in the country they gave to their enemies.

I hope that life in Yakima has become a little easier for you.

With every good wish,

Sincerely,

RP

.
.
.

20 September 1993

Revilo Pendleton Oliver

701 Ohio Street

Urbana, Illinois

61801

Mr. Eric Thomson

P.O. Box 896

Yakima, Washington  98907

Dear Mr. Thomson:

Thank you for the copy of the column by the Kike in the Toronto Sun. His family name may have been inherited from his parents. ‘Margolis’ is an odd derivative, or just possibly a cognate, of Margarita, the very common and variously spelled name given to girls. It is not uncommon among Jews in Lithuania and adjacent regions, and may even have been assumed as a family name with awareness of its etymological meaning, ‘pearl.’ (You know how Jews are obsessed by gold and jewels.)

I have Douglas Reed’s Somewhere South of Suez. He was certainly right about the Zionist supersession of Communism. The corruption in Russia has been obvious for a long time. There is a book by a Sheeny named Semis, who boasted about the magnitude of the underground business that enabled him to migrate from Russia to the Benighted States with a fortune in his pocket, and he even made it clear, no doubt inadvertently, that his race was the focus of the corruption.

You have probably received the letter of which I enclose a photocopy. It was mailed to me from Raleigh in a plain envelope on the fifteenth of this month. Although he is right in denouncing Covington as a menace, the author, whoever he is, is, or professes to be, a superstitious fool. Satan is as mythical as his counterpart, Yahweh-Jesus, and as impotent to do anything for the fools who believe in him and the occult rubbish that goes with the myth. He is also so stupid that he imagines that the authors of fiction believe what they right about. I never met Lovecraft, but I exchanged two or three letters with him, corresponded with August Derleth and had some personal acquaintance with Robert Howard, both of whom were Lovecraft’s close friends. He was an atheist. No man who writes brilliantly about the supernatural can believe in it. A talented believer could, no doubt, match Lovecraft’s English prose, but he could not show the originality of plausible plots and characterization. I seem to remember that Lovecraft said so in the little book in which he surveyed historically the writing of “supernatural horror” in English literature.

I also doubt that Covington can take the credit for Ben Klassen’s suicide. When Klassen telephoned me a few months before, he said that he was depressed by the death of his wife, and that he was a weary old man (almost ten years younger than I) who wanted only to end his days in inactive tranquillity. Although he did not say so, I am sure he was deeply dejected by the failure of the organization on which he must have spent a fortune. Of course, it cannot have been pleasant to be the object of such venomous vituperation by a person against whom he had no defence. (Covington boasts that he has no property that could be attached.)

I enclose a few other photocopies that may interest you.

With every good wish,

Sincerely,

RP

.
.
.

15 OCT 93

DEAR DR. OLIVER:  Thank you for your letter of September 20 and the interesting inclosures. I strongly suspect that the letter mailed to you from Raleigh is written by Covington. I have read much of Robert Howard’s work and I like his writing style and imagery, although I am not much of a reader of fiction. I have several unpublished shortstories which are based upon a sort of “Twilight Zone” theme. Two of them, which are based loosely upon Odinism, have become something of ‘classics’ in the USZOG_GULAGS amongst White prisoners, as I have been told. In regard to your firsthand acquaintanceship with Howard, whom you describe as an atheist, I wonder if you knew a prominent Yakima atheist by the name of Cardiff, who was also an inventor and a writer. Sadly, his son rejected Reason in favor of Papism and attempted to destroy all of his father’s work. Somehow, Cardiff’s personal library survived, to some extent, after a warehouse fire, which destroyed his inventions that he had been working on until his death. The fire, as I understand, was spontaneous and not arson. I purchased one of his books, “The Child’s Heredity” by Paul Popenoe, and discovered Cardiff’s signature therein. I have admired Popenoe ever since I read his study of the Jukes and the Kallikacks (sp?) in his book on eugenics, on which I wrote a term paper in high school, back in in 1955 and for which I received an “A”. Today, I would be unable to find his book in a high school library, no doubt and if I even expressed an interest in eugenics, I would be hauled out of class for counselling & “sensitivity training”. I think that Elmer Pendell, who wrote “Sex versus Civilization” and “Why Civilizations Self-Destruct” has also made an extremely valuable and even more up-to-date contribution to the field of practical eugenics.

Many years ago, but not quite a decade, if I recall correctly, you mentioned that Fritz Berg and Mark Weber were likely to fly off the handle and actually publish articles to assist the jews in showing them how their Holocaust COULD HAVE HAPPENED. You must have had a good crystal ball, for you predicted correctly their asininity, at least in respect to Berg, whose horrific article appeared in the most recent issue of LIBERTY BELL! I know how a mass-extermination could have occurred as well, but I would never publish it. I am, you know, an old railroad man. You can guess how quickly an ordinary steam locomotive would finish everyone aboard a train, were it stopped in  a tunnel. Having a tunnel with doors at either end and no ventilation stopes would allow the locomotive to convert all available oxygen into carbon monoxide in a very short time. I remember a newspaper article about such a disaster on the Spanish railroad to Irun. There is a long tunnel on that route and the steam locomotive was derailed after the train was well into the tunnel. As I recall, some 700 people aboard died of asphyxiation. I travelled through that same tunnel in 1965. The conductor ran from car to car, making sure every window was closed. Soon, we were in the tunnel and I could see thick, greasy smoke from the coal-burning locomotive coating the window glass outside. I then realized that this was the same tunnel I had read about in that newspaper article! I knew that if we were stopped, I had one resort, an old railroader’s trick: usually there is water running beside the tracks in a tunnel. If one quickly leaves the train and puts one’s nose close to the surface of the running water, there is supposedly sufficient oxygen there to breathe. If one is in a hurry, he might begin to crawl out of the tunnel, by keeping his nose down, close to the water surface. I have never tried it, but aside from carrying one’s own oxygen supply, it might have been the only recourse. I now await Mark Weber’s folly in the same regard, although he did his best to discredit “Did Six Million Really Die?” at Ernst Zundel’s thoughtcrime trail and thus, ‘did his bit’ to get Ernst convicted by a jury the second time, although I warned him about this before he gave his testimony.

I said to Mark and to Dr. Faurisson that this is an adversarial system of justice and that they should consider carefully their answers to all questions put to them, especially those of the prosecutor, since they are defense witnesses. Dr. Faurisson could be partially excused from his lapses, because he has trouble with tricky English nuances and he is still unused to Anglo-Saxon style court proceedings, but for Mark Weber there was no excuse. Both men told me how much they “liked” the prosecutor. They wanted to keep him smiling and friendly, so much so, that they told him some of the very things he wanted to hear! I couldn’t believe my ears. It was Dr. Faurisson who saved Hilberg’s kosher bacon in the first trial. He had not even read Hilberg’s book, upon which I was preparing questions for the defense. Faurisson told me how much he “respected” Hilberg and how much he wanted to be “recognized” by such an eminent scholar. Hilberg is a charlatan and should really be selling junky used cars or playing a ‘straight man’ in a borscht belt burlesque show. The only time Defense Attorney Doug Christie gave Hilberg a bad time on the witness stand was when I managed to break through Faurisson’s ‘respectful miasma’ by citing Hilberg’s 2 bogus “Hitler orders” on page 177 of his book, which you so kindly gave me. Had my questions been used, I doubt that Hilberg would have republished his hoax. As it was, he simply omitted the “two Hitler orders”, after suffering a minor ‘holocaust’ on the witness stand. I said several times to these men that you can respect an enemy, but he remains an enemy. That is what you should never forget!

Robert Frens, who published my interview of J.G. Burg (Josef Ginsburg) phoned me some shocking news from his recent attendance at a David Irving speech in Niagara Falls, New York. Ernst Zundel, under the constant control of his dominatrix Ayn Rand look-alike “Anne Burton”, claimed that I never interviewed Burg and that I had made up my interview. He had revisionist newsletter publisher Jack Wikoff suppress publication of the article. I suppose he will do the same with George Dietz, but I hope not, for what Burg told me is of great importance. At the Irving meeting Ernst denied that he had suppressed my writing in Toronto (a lie) while he was suppressing my writing in New York State! Such behavior is quite jewish. Ernst forgets the many hours I spent with Burg, alone, plus my presence during the long televised interview which Ernst has suppressed, in addition to my presence at Burg’s press conference. I have cross-checked my notes of Burg’s statements with his testimony in court and I find no contradictions. Thus, if my interview is “fake”, it seems to accord with Burg’s testimony, so it is certainly not inaccurate. I see no reason why I should fake an interview. What Burg told me can be confirmed by research into Allied archives. If one chooses not to trust me, then why trust Burg? As I say, I am shocked by such a display of animosity on Ernst’s part and I am disgusted by his all-out attempt to suppress this article. According to Robert, Ernst claims that I would have nothing to do with Burg, since I detest jews. I do not detest anyone, unless he is doing something detestable and I certainly did not detest Josef Ginsburg. I treated him with utmost attentiveness and I accorded him all the respect one should accord a worthy enemy. His statements were doubly valuable to me (1) for what he witnessed and (2) for who he was. Ernst is behaving ever more erratic and unreasonable. Apparently, “Anne Burton” is able to force Ernst to reconstruct his recollection of his own experiences. Her power over him is grossly evident to all who see them and it is appalling.

I am not in competition with Ernst. I am not siphoning off his donations and I have no intention of doing so. I earn no money and receive no support from my articles, which are read by very few people. What is his problem? The Burg interview is indeed based upon my notes of our conversations and it is genuine. Let Ernst transcribe HIS interview with Burg, which was much longer and more detailed. I know because I sat through most of it in his videobunker at the time it was made. Why does Ernst sit upon so much information? He does nothing with it and I fear that it will go down the Orwellian Memory Hole, liket he archives of “Common Sense”. That would be a great loss! Still, if Ernst continues to hang onto it and does nothing with it for another 20 years, it will be largely irrelevant, just as his undistributed copies of “China, the Jews & World War III” are now out-dated with the breakup of the Soviet Union. As far as I know, Ernst is still sitting on dozens of those books as well as thousands of Holocaust Trial Facti, which are now out-dated and of no interest, since they refer to t trail which was superseded by another trial, which resulted, finally, in the abolition of the law under which Ernst was tried in the first place! His non-promotion of Barbara Kulaszka’s book on the last Holocaust Trial almost guarantees that its importance will be superseded by world events. Ernst loses dozens of unsold books every year to dryrot. His amazing library of reference is being gradually consumed by beetles, mice, squirrels, moths & silverfish. The volumes are unsorted & unread by anyone and will likely remain so, as long as they are in Ernst’s possession. Young people who could benefit from such knowledge are turned away & made to feel unwelcome. Ernst is going all-out to obtain inheritances, so he is concerning himself with elderly supporters only. His activities are pretty much reduced to self-promotional appearances & trips back & forth to Europe with his “lady-friend”, “Anne Burton”. He is not disseminating the great store of information he has on hand, nor is he building and organization of active people. His claims of being responsible for events in Germany are no more correct than if he would claim to be responsible for making the sun rise in the east. It is obvious that he intends to do nothing with his supporters’ donations, other than live off them. I am very disappointed by his behavior. 

In none of my published articles have I ever mentioned my assessment of Ernst. When I mention his name, it is with respect as a victim of and fighter against Zionism and its Holocaust Lie. In this regard, he made a worthy effort in the past and that will not change. His present activities and lack thereof I deem unworthy of my support, but if others with to support his perambulations, they are most welcome. There are always more foolish and even less useful ways of spending money. What I do not understand is Ernst’s most recent attack against me, as if I were competing for his donors’ support. Until I receive even one penny from someone who claims to have been a Zundel supporter, he should not behave in this intemperate manner. I have made no fund appeals. I have no newsletter, nor organization. Few people in the revisionist community who know Ernst have ever contacted me. He is obviously the victim of his own imagination which has been poisoned by his venomous vixen, “Anne Burton”.

The suppression of the J.G. Burg interview is exactly what any jewish group would seek to do. It is sad that Aryan donations go to Erst so that he can do this job for the jews.

18 OCT 93. I have just been informed that Ernst has contradicted himself once more. now, he “recalls” that I did have several opportunities to question Burg & that he even ‘witnessed’ me with him. Ernst now thinks that my article should be widely circulated, but he does not say how, nor does he offer to publish it in his own newsletter which has an approximate circulation, in German & English, of 2000 people worldwide. Ernst thinks I should have been more complete in regard to Josef Ginsburg’s biography, but he forgets that I was not allowed by Ernst to write such an article while I had access to that information. Ernst is sitting on the videotaped interview of Ginsburg which has all that information. It is absurd to accuse me of incompleteness in my article when he is the author of the delay in its appearance as well as its truncated form. His sudden recall is indicative of his memory’s ability to recover when he is not in the dominance pattern of “Anne Burton”.

ALL THE BEST!

E.T.

.
.
.

1 November 1993

Revilo Pendleton Oliver
701 Ohio Street
Urbana, Illinois
61801

Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington  98907

Dear Mr. Thomson:

I congratulate you on your two excellent articles in the current issue of Liberty Bell. Both state facts that cannot be too strongly emphasized: the innate nature of niggers, which makes them regard kindness as weakness and thus intensifies their hatred; and Jews who fear that the Zionists may bring catastrophe upon the race as a whole are useful allies in present circumstances, but can never be one of us.

I was glad to have your letter of 15 October.

I see no harm in demonstrating what facilities the Germans had for disposing of Yids, and thus showing the stupidity of the Holohoaxers, who did not think of imagining use of those far more convenient and efficient facilities. What I regard as reprehensible is quibbling and even polemics among “revisionists” over details — especially such things as Frenz’s ignoble and disgusting attack on Fred Leuchter.

Life in academic circles, such as was Faurisson’s during his fairly long career and of which Mark Weber had some little experience, is a great handicap in adversarial positions. It is a tradition of respect for learning per se and of a certain comity in personal relations. The Jews who were my colleagues on the faculty here hated me, of course, but never breached the formal decorum of academic life. The only persons who did were (1) a Mischling who pretended he was not a Jew; I laughed at his diatribe and told him I knew his racial antecedents, thus almost inducing his death by apoplexy before I walked away, and (2) a goy, Ph.D. from Yale in Romance Languages, who yelled abusively at my wife across the width of a drug store, but apologized when he found he could not avoid meeting me on the street.

What is happening to Zundel is tragic and potentially disastrous, and it is sad that nothing can be done about it. It is truism in intelligence work that a trained female operative is the surest and quickest means of neutralizing or corrupting a man in a responsible position, but women as a sex, with their concern for respectability and peace, are likely to inhibit a man’s efforts. The sad experience of some of my friends made me aware of my extraordinary good fortune in having a wife who fully shared my opinions and never complained of the sacrifices she had to make.

You have noticed the latest phase of the race war in Southern California. I have not heard from a number of acquaintances who lived in or near the burned-out regions.

With all good wishes,

As ever,

RP

.
.
.

8 NOV 93. Dear Dr. Oliver: Thank you for your letter of 1 November. I was intrigued by your mention of my TWO articles in the November issue of LIBERTY BELL. I did not write the article on Rhodesia. The author, J.B. Campbell, had experiences similar to mine and if John Coey had survived the jews’ phony war in Rhodesia, he would have been able to write the same things. I did not resign my position. I was deported by the Ian Smith traitor regime in March, 1976, because of my activities as Treasurer/Organizer of The Rhodesian White People’s Party. The article from the Rhodesian Government publication in regard to the deportation is reproduced in my booklet, “Rhodesia Today — Race War & Race Suicide”, which Dietz published in 1976. It was first published in Canada by the Western Guard Party in 1975, before I left Rhodesia. I have never met nor corresponded with J.B. Campbell. One day it would be interesting to compare notes on our experiences. I am gratified that he came to the same conclusions from his experiences as I did from similar ones. I could have written the J.B. Campbell article, but I am glad I am not the only White man on Earth who is able to do so. It is interesting that Harold Covington has not, to my knowledge, written anything as instructive in regard to his own experiences in Rhodesia and South Africa. J.B. Campbell has a lot to offer as an educator of young Whites. Covington offers nothing but overblown opinions.

In regard to Fritz Berg’s article on how the Germans really could have gassed the kikes, I can only say that most Goy Holohoax-believers are not too bright. Moreover, they WANT to believe their precious yids. I saw that in 2 Holocaust trials in Toronto. Professor Lindsey testified on the witness stand that IF the chimneys of the crematoria had been lined with modern armored ceramics, the chimneys could have flamed without collapsing. Since the jews claimed the chimneys were flaming, the jury concluded that the Germans must have used armored ceramic construction. The TV epic, “Holocaust”, showed a number of preposterous methods of ‘holocausting’ the yiddles, before they had studied revisionist literature. “War & Remembrance” obviously reflected such studies, for I recall one scene of burning bodies in pyres, not “burning pits”, which were well aboveground, as was done to the German victims of the Dresden Holocaust. Revisionism should rebut the Hoax, as given, not invent new ‘possibilities’ for subsequent use by the Holohoaxers. The “gas chambers for trains” story may make its appearance in another kosher ‘docudrama’. I agree with you in regard to Robert Frenz’s attack on Fred Leuchter. I do not see Dietz’ motive in republishing such scandalous material, although I have long ago concluded that Dietz is basically a prankster and a mischief-maker. The only joy he gets out of life is in knowing that somewhere, somehow, there is somebody who is offended and annoyed by his publication. The fact that he publishes your articles and others of great value is purely coincidental. I am glad the “J.G. Burg” article appeared, despite the previously successful efforts of Ernst Zundel’s dominatrix in suppressing its publication in Jack Wikoff’s “REMARKS”. My purpose is not to annoy, but to inform. I hope that the readers of LIBERTY BELL are taking advantage of the cornucopia of information which you have been providing them with for so many years.

Robert Frenz tells me that the IHR may self-destruct through internecine strife. To my knowledge, very few of the people in their Costa Mesa H.Q. have much character or moral fiber, least of all Willis Carto. Too bad!

In regard to John Coey, a young American patriot who was killed in an ambush while fighting for “Christian, anti-Communist Rhodesia”, as he put it, I met him through Wilfred Brooks after reading Coey’s article in ASSAGAI, the Rhodesian Army publication. It was in 1974 that I met him and advised him to return to the United States, for Smith was going to sell out Rhodesia to Black misrule. Coey preferred to chase niggers in the bush on behalf of “God” and “anti-Communism”, so that’s where he died, without issue. His White girlfriend, being Christian, couldn’t make up her mine on that, either. I tried to explain to him that all my findings indicated the Cold War to be an Orwellian hoax; that the niggers had always practiced communism within their respective tribes and that it was futile to fight in a war which was already lost. I said that it would be best for “God” and “anti-Communism” if he would return to the U.S.A., where he had status and his family had money, and there, have as many White children as possible. Too bad he didn’t take my advice. He asked me what I was doing in Rhodesia and I replied that I was there for “reasons of health” and that I could not afford to return to the U.S.A. at that time. Once the Nixon administration was ousted, the jew Nelson Rockefeller was dead, the Attorney General Mitchell imprisoned and the Mafia-lackey Hoover filed in the graveyard, I could return, not that I cared one bit where I would live on this planet. After some quarter century of exile, I did return. My brief stint at Reedy, WV, was merely an interruption, and it was ‘unofficial’, although my presence was betrayed to the F.B.I. by two informants in Toronto: Don Andrews, a Serb who adopted a Scottish name and ‘Injun’ John Ross Taylor, a half-breed hanger-on at the Western Guard Party. It was James N. Mason who relayed the information of my whereabouts to FEDZOGUSA during the tiff with George Dietz. Two FBI prostitutes for pay and pension soon visited us in Reedy on an absurd pretext that someone had stuck a WHITE POWER sticker on a telephone pole next to Nigger Dellums’ office in California.

I agree with your analysis of White females, who are usually ‘agents’ for the establishment in terms of their desire for ‘peace’ and material possessions. Over the decades, I have become a firm believer in what I call The Law of the Contrary. The jew “Lenin” had a faithful common-law female companion, the jewess Krupskaya. Even Kemal Ataturk had a female partner when he fought in the trenches of the Turkish civil war and the subsequent war against the Greeks. Randy Weaver and his wife, both of whom appeared to be Amerasians or mestizos, were mutually-supportive unto death. I do not wonder at the fact that I have remained unmarried, in view of my penurious and insecure economic position, as well as my being kicked out of five countries, including the U.S.A. Of course, “Lenin” and “Trotsky” had lives of similar upheavals, but their women stuck by them. What is Contrary about all this is that neither Commie kike believed in monogamy, yet they were more faithful to this principle than are most of the Christian ‘monogamists’ whom we see today, just as the most materialistic society in the world prints “in God we trust” on its money. Perhaps monogamy would be generally practiced if we were to preach “free love” in the pulpits and have no marriage ceremonies at all. Unless White women can be enlisted to support White men, we are unlikely to achieve much in the way of success. I noted in many pictures taken of German National Socialist rallies and meetings that men and women were equally present in the audiences and that they were sitting as couples. That is why National Socialism succeeded as it did.

Further to my observations on The Law of the Contrary: where I expected to make money, I went broke, as most recently here in Yakima. Where I expected danger, I found security; where I expected security, I found danger; where I expected war, I found peace, as during my 7-year stint in Rhodesia. Where I expected to go broke, I earned a living. Now I just examine my expectations and assume the opposite and I can make fairly accurate predictions. If you consider the risk I undertook in selling firearms in Mexico as compared to my apparent safety in resuming my academic studies, you may agree that it is most contrary to find my life and freedom threatened from pushing papers, rather than pistols, as I found out in 1969. I have never experienced the degree of academic decorum which you describe in your letter.  A jew professor of U.S. history, Rappaport, warned the class of Berkeley undergrads that “anyone who even suggested that Roosevelt knew about Pearl Harbor’s intended fate at the hands of the Japs would flunk” his course. I prudently confined my research to “progressivism” and got an “A”. I suspect that my faculty advisors who said “it would be just fine” for me to pursue a doctoral dissertation on the Peruvian situation may have set me up for harassment from USZOG, for they had a good insight as to my investigative competence. The reason I wished to do research in Peru, instead of San Francisco State College (now “University”), was simply because the little yiddles were having their “student strikes” in 1968-1969, which made academic work impossible. In my undergrad studies at Berkeley, I had a jew professor of “labor economics” who let everyone know that anti-union papers would be given a failing grade in his course.

Certainly there would have been more academic decorum amongst faculty members, but I can only describe the lack thereof which I experienced as a student. The most disconcerting discovery of all was in my security clearance procedure when I was entering the U.S. Army Security Agency. The Jap officer in charge read me statements which I had made in undergraduate seminars and questions I had asked in classes at Berkeley, all of which were duly reported by professors, teaching assistants and fellow students. One incident which was reported at some length was an accusation that I had “stolen” a fellow student’s “engineering pencil”, one of those metal pencils which grip the ‘lead’ at the tip and which requires a special pencil sharpener for drafting purposes. I recalled that the informant had challenged me to an impromptu wrestling match and that he had been ignominiously defeated, although he was much larger than I. During this tussle, he lost his pencil and I later found it and returned it to him. Had I any use for such an item, I would probably have kept it and he would have been none the wiser. It appeared to me, as I told the Jap, that he sought belated ‘revenge’ for being bested in the wrestling match, which had embarrassed him in front of his fellow students. So much for academic freedom of enquiry and expression! The world you describe to me is quite different from my experience. In fact, I find more decorum in courtrooms than I found in ‘our’ universities.

But none of this excuses Mark Weber’s performance on the witness stand in Toronto. He has undoubtedly watched Perry Mason shows on TV. I warned him that a courtroom was not a symposium, but a minefield in which a man’s freedom was at stake. You are kind to argue in his defence, but I have little respect for Mark in regard to his behavior during the trial.

Even when I was attending Occidental College, from 1956 to 1958, debating was an occasional feature of college life. I recall reading books on the subject. One book had, as an example, the argument for an against capital punishment, with at least 3 statements for and 3 rebuttals thereof. How can one attend an institution of ‘higher learning’ and receive no knowledge of debating techniques? The Anglo-Saxon court system is largely a system of debate. Where in Hades did Messrs. Lindsey, Weber & Weber (Charles) go to school and in what exotic land? Charles Weber was so fuddled, he could not recall the book he had written on the topic at hand. I have participated as a courtroom witness and I can at least recall things I have written, especially if they have a direct bearing on the subject of my testimony. Of course, none of us is perfect, but I find such rampant imperfection appalling when academicians perform worse than peasants on the very subjects of their expertise.

Oh well, Ernst Zundel kept telling me that the trials were only a steppingstone toward the building of an organization for political action. This was apparently why he adopted some pretty poor trial strategies, in my opinion. Ernst told me that “Anne Burton” said “the jews would kill him if he won.” I asked Ernst then if he were afraid to win, but he said nothing. As we saw, no political organization was created, because Ernst actively repelled everyone who wished to form one, just as he finally repelled me. What were his motives from the beginning? Were they self-aggrandizement and did he pull in his horns when the jews scared him? Or was it the malign influence of his dominatrix, “Anne Burton”, who put on the brakes and caused him to careen off his useful course? Like the thesis of the book, “Spycatcher”, the ending will remain with such suppositions and doubts.

ALL THE BEST!

E.T.

.
.
.

6 November 1993

Revilo Pendleton Oliver
701 Ohio Street
Urbana, Illinois
61801

DEAR GEORGE [Dietz]:

I HAVE JUST COME UPON THE ENCLOSED WHILE SORTING THROUGH A MOUND OF ACCUMULATED DEBRIS. IS IT CONCEIVABLE THAT I HAVE HAD THEM SINCE 1986? IN ANY CASE, MY APOLOGIES FOR FAILING TO RETURN THEM PROMPTLY.

AGAIN, MY CONGRATULATIONS ON THE NOVEMBER ISSUE WITH ITS TWO EXCELLENT ARTICLES BY ERIC THOMSON, ONE BY DR. BENTINCK, EXCELLENT NOTES BY MAJOR CLERKIN, AND A GOOD CONTRIBUTION FROM CANADA.

BEST WISHES,

AS EVER,

RP

.
.
.

10 January 1994

Revilo Pendleton Oliver
701 Ohio Street
Urbana, Illinois
61801

Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington  98907

Dear Mr. Thomson:

Thank you for yours of the fourth and the enclosures.

I appreciated the copy of your letter to the stormy petrel in Canada whose gentile name I am too lazy to look up. Of course, he’s going to start another newsletter to compete for table scraps with the scores of ego-soothers now made possible by computers and laser printers. (I hear of a new one every month.)

Was your warning to the Rhodesians in 1976 published? If so, could you offhand give me reference to it, or even a photocopy? The South Africans are simply disgusting. Since I am not sure that you receive Instauration, I enclose a photocopy from the current issue. The writer is the author of White Man, Think Again! When that book, published by an Africaans firm, was suppressed in South Africa, with no protest from the local boobs, I new who had arranged the murder of Verwoerd. The pirated American edition, by the way, is an improvement on the original, of which the small type was enlarged to make the text more comfortably readable.

Thank you especially for the columns by Margolis. I am going to quote from the one about Kennedy in Liberty Bell. The article on Japan does not tell the worst: North Korea is just a puppet manipulated by China, which is now testing atomic missiles, too large to be tactical, but smaller than intercontinental missiles, i.e., just about the right size for use on Japan. According to the current Criminal Politics, the Sheenies still control China. (See enclosed photocopies.) And the Japanese believe, perhaps correctly, that they are the only nation standing between Yahweh’s Yids and the completion of their conquest of the world.

The “accord” between Kikistan and the Palestinians was, of course, just a comic skit to soothe boobs and lend a bit of prestige to Mr. Rodham. Arafat was undoubtedly bribed, at the expense of the American tax-paying animals, of course, either to sell out or to pretend to sell out the Palestinians. Margolis believes that there is a real opposition between two major factions in Judaea, says that they came close to civil war in 1948-1950, and obscurely hints they may do so again. If they do, the carnage will be beautiful, on the scale of the civil wars between factions of Sheenies that began as soon as they attained any degree of autonomy under the Seleucids and continued even during the siege of Jerusalem by the Romans in 59-60. But, despite Margolis’s apparent belief in a willingness to coexist with Palestinians, it seems that the opposition is between a faction (Likud) that denounces the “agreement” in principle and a faction (Rabin’s) that wants to wait until the inevitable violence on both sides makes the ambiguous “peace” impossible.

Again, many thanks and all good wishes,

Sincerely,

RP

.
.
.

21 January 94.  Dear Dr. Oliver: Please pardon this photocopy, but I noticed that my typewriter ribbon has faded, so I wanted you to have a more legible letter than the original. In response to your letter of 10 January, I hasten to send you a reasonably good copy of my 1976 article entitled “Rhodesia Today — Race War & Race Suicide” by Eric Campbell (my Canadian pen name). I also enclose the related article, “Rhodesia & You”, which appeared in Liberty Bell, July 1977. The reason for my use of pen names & anonymity was to disguise the fact that all the articles were coming from one person. I wanted to get the information out before I was prevented from doing so by the Z.O.G. My previous experiences at the hands of Zionist Occupation Government censorship involved attacks on my own person, deportations & seizures of my work in several countries, the first of them being the U.S.A. By maintaining an attempted low profile, I hoped to complete & circulate most of my findings before I was hampered by further Z.O.G. harassment. It is interesting that my chief censor would be Ernst Zundel, whose jewish dominatrix, “Anne Burton”, ordered him to stop me from writing in order to prevent Ernst from being jailed. With 20-20 hindsight, I see how effective her pro-Zionist censorship strategy was, for I wrote virtually nothing for ten years, and when I at last published my Josef Ginsburg interview, Ernst, at her behest, claimed that I had “faked the interview” and that I “had never spoken to Ginsburg.” I was surprised to read in your letter that you had missed my article on Rhodesia, but I think you will find it as timely in regard to South Africa, despite the passage of time.

I received the new rightwing, desktop publication, “Stormfront”, from Don Black of Florida, to whom I had written the letter of which I sent you a copy. It is a good effort, albeit with lots of typos, but how many more ‘patriotic publications’ can the White people of America afford to continue consuming, as the country is overrun and sinks under the morass of swarming mud-people, as it is robbed blind by the jew-banksters? I feel as if we are passengers on the TITANIC and that our fellow passengers are vying to sell us the newsletter subscriptions so that we will be able to read about every aspect of our ship’s sinking. As long as no one intends to man the lifeboats, plug the leak, increase the pump output, &c., one might be wiser to order some champagne and have the ship’s orchestra play some cheerful waltzes.

Margolis is a great source of information and I shall send you whatever I receive of his columns from my source in Canada.

Arafat, in my opinion, is similar to Ghandi of India. He is the least popular leader of the Palestinians, a sort of ‘nondenominational, secular socialist Arab’, amid a majority who crave a Mahdi who will lead them in a kamekazi-style Jihad. I have always suspected that he is the jews’ favorite Arab, if not their stooge. As I understand, te Zionist Occupation Government of Britain fielded the scrawny pervert Ghandi to head off Chandra Bose’s supporters. Wog affairs would resume their passive role in history if Whites would only stop financing all sides to their issues, on behalf of the jews.

I read “White Man, Think Again!” although I do not recall the author’s name, for it was many years ago. I found White South Africans, both British & Boer, to be quite impossible. The British were prepared to join the Blacks or bolt back to Britain; the Boers refused to ally themselevs with other Whites because they believed themselves to be “the new true Israelites”. They were both stupid & stubborn & worst of all, the Boers were addicted to Black labor. The Boer Nationalist Governments, since the assassination of Verwoerd, have all been in the Rothschilds’ pockets through their cheif agent, Harry Oppenheimer, but as long as the traitors had Boer names, the Afrikaaners thought everything was fine. Israeli jews were encouraged to swarm into South Africa to act as “military advisers” and even “advise” the South African Government how to solve its color problem: give the country to the Black savages! Jews hate Goyim who claim to be “the true jews” themselves, as we have seen most recently in the Koresh episode. Thus will the fate of the Boers be not only predictable, but terrible. It reminds one of that Hollywood sequel to the sequel of “The Planet of the Apes” movie: “Battle for the Planet of the Apes”, which apes South African life. The niggers in monkey costumes look very much like niggers and certainly act like them, while the humans are all White people & the police wear black SS uniforms. I happened to be in a restaurant in Toronto which had a television set turned to that movie, so I first thought it was a newsreel of a nigger riot in South Africa, until I paid closer attention. Scary, indeed!

Here I sit in Yakima, a mere tomahawk-throw from the “Yakima Indian Nation” reservation. I am as irrelevant here as I was in Louisville. As usual, I am standing in the station with a full head of steam; ready, willing and able to answer the call of Our Race, just as I was 20 years ago. No one appears to be interested in defending White interests in the Jewess-Eh qua White people, so I foresee that I shall be irrelevant for quite some time, perhaps for the rest of my life. I can just imagine being the last White man in Yakima, surrounded by a crowd of Chinese who want to know about jewish domination & financial finagling! In Louisville, I was a gardener. Here, I am a ticket-taker at a parking lot. I have never earned one cent from my years of writing, since there appears to be “no market” for it. That means that I must scrounge the time for research & writing when I am not gardening or ticket-taking. But there are, after all, more expensive hobbies than mine, so I have no complaints. Perhaps White people already know everything I have to tell them & they have already made up their minds to do nothing whatsoever about it. I guess that would be no great surprise to me. People who choose to live like cattle generally die like cattle.

I do not know if you have already received a copy of the Lenski book for your archives &/or for passing on, so I shall enclose one with this mailing. Please keep it or pass it on.

There is one anonymously written article by me on the subject of oil as an excuse for U.S. involvement in the Middle East wars, on behalf of Israel. This article appeared in LIBERTY BELL or WHITE POWER REPORT in 1977 or early 1978. As I recall, the cover had a clip-art depiction of an oil refinery, so it should be easily identified. George “could not find it”, which means that his own archives of his own publications must be in a mess. I am intrigued as to what I had written in that article, for my warning predicted our involvement in “Desert Storm”, as well as our continued military presence in the Middle East, using oil as the excuse. I believe that I pointed out that there was never an oil shortage, particularly in North America. One jewess claimed that it was “cheaper” to fight a war in the Middle East than to uncap some East Texas oil wells. Earlier, she had chimed in on a conversation I was having with a White man in a local restaurant. I said her idea was nonsense & that she was talking to the one person who know it to be nonsense, for I do have a background in oil exploration & development from my father & John Burton, the long-suffering husband of the kikess, “Anne Burton”. John Burton discovered oil in Saskatchewan & was about to develop new oilfields in Ontario, Canada, before he was stopped by the so-called government of “Soviet Canuckistan” at the behest of the Rockefeller-owned Petroleum Institute. To the distinct embarrassment of the ZOG of Canada, oil keeps forcing its way to the surface in such places as Jarvis, Ontario. Water coming from the taps has oil in it. Mr. Burton mentioned that the oldest oilfield in North America, the site where oil was discovered before Drake’s well in Pennsylvania, is PETROLIA, Ontario, where the original wells are still producing. Another embarrassing fact for the Zoglings who preach of an oil shortage. According to J.B., Britain is floating on oil and so are many countries on the Atlantic shores in Europe. British subsoil laws are so restrictive & so arcane that land oil-drilling is prohibited, so the oilwells are just “offshore” & they reach their on-land sources via directional drilling. My father said that over 360 wells can be drilled directionally from one rig site. 

The hapless  Iraquis were complaining about Kuwaitis tapping into their oil reserves by such methods, which preclude the location of a drilling rig on or near the oil source. They were not imagining things in this regard. A Caltex official (retired) whom I met in Africa, informed me that some 52 producing oilwells had been discovered “offshore” along the coast of Mozambique & South Africa.* One local, Bulawayo geologist assured me that Rhodesia had tremendous oil reserves, as well as coal, but the powers-that-be preferred to keep them out of production for political & economic reasons. It was “better”, in their view, to keep Rhodesia & South Africa dependent on oil supplied from the Middle East. Once again, we see the jew-middleman at work, for by preventing any territory’s people from becoming self-sufficient, they are able to dominate such dependents and make a profit! It is the old theme of “divide & rule”, but in this case, it is the separation of people from essential items which they require for living & the control of supply via foreign trade. Subsoil mineral wealth in its quantities & locations is a ‘top secret’ known to few governments & even fewer of the governed. Imagine if Germany had been able to develop its own oil reserves before world Wars I & II! I noted a peculiar picture in one of Ernst Zundel’s precious books which are somewhere in his ‘library’. It was entitled “Deutscher Feldzug im Osten”, which really reported on the German invasion of Poland. There was one picture showing numerous OIL WELLS on Polish territory near the Czech border, possibly the very territory which Poland had invaded upon the breakup of Czechoslovakia. Oil shortage, indeed! The Germans had devised efficient technology for the extraction of oil from coal. The judeo-Americans stole their patents, among tons of other inventions, and built a oil-from-coal plant somewhere near the Ohio River under the Eisenhower regime. As I understand, the cost per barrel was almost competitive with the cost of domestically-produced oil from wells. The oil gangsters ordered the project demolished & no more was heard thereof. As I understand, the South Africans also copied the German designs and produce oil from coal at Sasolburg in South Africa. It is notable that the facilities were attacked by unspecified terrorists & were heavily damaged when I was in Rhodesia, as I recall. Subsequently, I was informed that the South Africans were doubling capacity at this site.

The above is something to bear in mind whenever Americans are urged to send their sons & daughters to war in the Middle East on behalf of oil & Israel. I have met several dozen participants in “Desert Storm” since my return to the Jewess-Eh and I must say that they would be no loss to the country, had they never returned. Where are the human beings, the homo sapiens? All I encounter, with the fewest exceptions are ambulatory anthropoids whose concept of the future extends only to the end of the football season. The downbreeding of American humanoids is proceeding at an ever-accelerating pace & is noticeable when one has lived outside the territory for almost a quarter century as I have done. There is rapidly becoming little to choose between Whites & non-Whites in this country. It is amazing! The disordered crumbling of the United States which I depicted in my novel, “The Chosen One” seems to be looming into our own lifetimes. I make no claims to prophecy, but my predictions have been accurate in regard to the fates of  Rhodesia & South Africa and I am afraid that they are coming true in regard to the U.S.A. I am one ‘seer’ who would love to be proven wrong, for my predictions are usually dire ones and it gives me no great satisfaction to tell my fellow passengers who are with me in the icy sea that I had told them correctly about our collision with the iceberg.

It is not that the jews are so smart. It is that we wish to know nothing about our own affairs & interests, beyond our immediate physical gratifications & when we do know, we don’t want to bring our behavior into accordance with our knowledge. As long as we continue on our stupid, swinish path, we shall provide the jews with slaves & sacrificial beasts of our own flesh & blood. Those who choose to live like cattle, die like cattle. Do lemmings feel there is ‘safety in numbers?

ALL THE BEST!

E.T.

* & were capped.

P.S.: Your letter of 19 January arrived as I was about to mail the present letter to you. The last communication I had with Covington, alias Winston Smith, was my letter dated 26 September 1992, a copy I enclose for your archives. The handwritten letter signed “Winston Smith”, dated 14 Jan 92 with a London, U.K. return address is Covington’s, I am pretty sure. As I recall, he was using a London postal address. I have nothing further to say to the likes of Covington, for he is incorrigible at best & quite possibly a ZOG-agent, at worst. His grasp of political tactics & strategy is abysmal & his objectives nebulous. His attitude toward White National Socialism, as he expressed it to me, is that it is a “bitter medicine” we must take, but for now, we can “enjoy” our nigger music, jewish humor & fast, junk-foods. Somehow, listening to Wagner & behaving like decent, productive White folk is a “bitter medicine” to Covington. This statement reveals to me the gist of his being, like the tip of an iceberg. Since Covington’s goals & behavior are trashy, as I have seen in my years of association with him, I don’t believe I need look further to ascertain that the substance beneath the trash heap is the contents of a city dump, any more than we need wonder as to the composition of an iceberg’s submarine dimensions.

I am of the opinion that the situation in North America is hopeless, but not serious, while the situation in Europe is serious, but not hopeless. The rapprochement which may come about between Western Europe & Russia is something I depicted in my somewhat prophetic novel, “The Chosen One”. We shall see how Jew-nighted States meddling can postpone the coincidence of mutual interests. The U.S.A. is indeed, “The Enemy of Europe,” and for that matter, of the entire White Race.

I regret that George saw fit to publish Covington’s peculiar, incorrect & illegal ramblings entitled “The March Up Country.” I warned him that advocacy of the forceful overthrow of the U.S. government is illegal. Strange how the book appeared just at the beginning of the Sedition Trial in Ft. Smith. Had the trial not proved to be a farce, George might have found himself out of business & in the ZOG-GULAG. Now, he must beware of civil suits for ‘thought-crime’ of the sort which bankrupted the Metzgers. The kikes are having such a law passed in “Soviet Canuckistan” in order to bankrupt their opponents & deny them the martyr’s role, as they have complained in regard to criminal prosecution for the same thought-crime offenses against the hebes. Yockey told us that we live in an age of “total politics” & those very people who sold “Imperium” are seemingly the last ones to believe that which they sell. I warned Ernst before he got involved in direct confrontation to a major jew-interest, the Holohoax, that he must be prepared to sacrifice his time, his money, his effort & his life. I also said that if he feared for the lives of his sons & ex-wife, he should not take the first step. Obviously, he disregarded my warning & now, he seems to have caved in & dissipates his supporters’ funds & labor in unnecessary & even counter-productive activities, like getting people put in jail in ZOG’s Germany & then amassing donations for trials in the kosher kangaroo kourts. I told Robert Frens that it is like a burlesque show comedian who is requesting money to buy bananas so that he can pull more pratfalls. As one Samisdat supporter said to me: “Ernst is a changed & fearful man since his last time in jail.” Another alienated Samisdat supporter said: “Obviously, someone ‘spoke’ to him & let him know some of the things they could & would do to him if he did not behave.” I soon witnessed Ernst’s studious alienation of all young, active supporters &  his diffusion & dissipation of effort, misplacement of personnel, such as myself & squandering of funds on projects which were never concluded & were of dubious worth to begin with. He developed a pattern for alienating the best people: (1) Request them to do something, as a matter of ‘urgency’ & (2) Ignore &/or abandon the item or project as soon as it was completed by the volunteer. Intelligent supporters recognized ‘make-work’ projects for what they were & soon stayed away from Samisdat. Ernst put incompetent people in charge of projects such as mailing lists, where they could do the most damage. NOW TO MAIL THIS BEFORE IT EXCEEDS THE 2 POUND LIMIT!

.
.
.

19 January 1994

Revilo Pendleton Oliver
701 Ohio Street
Urbana, Illinois
61801

Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington  98907

Dear Mr. Thomson:

I am told that while the files of the Church of the Creator were being cleared out and destroyed to prepare the building for its new owner, the letter of which I enclose a photocopy was noticed and saved. If genuine, it certainly illustrates the hypocrisy and dishonesty of Covington. Do you recognize the handwriting?

He probably sent you a copy of the notice that he is discontinuing publication of the “newsletter” that he probably began to have a convenient vehicle for his defamation of the late Ben Klassen, but I enclose a photocopy, on the chance that you may not have seen it.

I have now read Klassen’s autobiography, which confirms my impression of his character and what I have been told by men who knew him better than I did. I am now certain that Harold’s inflated ego (assuming that he is not a hireling) made him invent all the slime he threw at Klassen.

I use the term ‘hireling’ to cover the not uncommon situation in which a would-be leader is induced to commit some crime and then forced by blackmail to serve the Federal Bureau of Intimidation or some other agency of the occupation government. That could, of course, have happened to hectoring Harold.

I hear indirectly that he intends to found a “National Front,” evidently in imitation of the one that disintegrated in England a few years ago, which is to gain popularity by being secret. I wonder whether that is more than simply another attempt to inflate his ego.

Did you send him a copy of your five-page memorandum dated 17 January 1993? If so, he will probably appropriate your shrewd analysis of the “right wing” and present it as his own wisdom. By the way, that memorandum could be easily amended to serve as an excellent article for Liberty Bell, using the events in Canada as cogent illustrations.

The January issue contains a letter from a prisoner in Texas whose experiences go far to explain what is wrong with so many feckless recruits to the “right wing.” They have been demoralized by the public boob-hatcheries and have not been given anything to arouse the manhood latent in them.

With all good wishes,

As ever,

RP


  • Similar posts:

    1. 10/09/07 Letters Between Eric Thomson and Revilo Oliver (1992) 71% similar
    2. 04/18/06 Letters of Eric Thomson 41% similar
    3. 04/04/06 Letters of Eric Thomson 37% similar
    4. 11/09/06 THOMSON: Letters (10-11/06) 30% similar
    5. 07/02/09 More Dr. Revilo Oliver 27% similar
    6. 32 Responses to “Letters Between Eric Thomson and Revilo Oliver (1993-1994)”

      1. Charles Martel Says:

        Jeez, that is one hell of a post Alex. For those of your readers that have never heard of RO, I highly recommend his older speeches (just as I do of those by Commander Rockwell and William Pierce.

        But now is the time to download the speeches from http://www.revilo-oliver.com while the site lasts and is not taken down. I really wish they were archived somewhere else more reliable though. :(

      2. New America Says:

        As I read Dr. Oliver’s letters, I remain amazed that the White Nationalist Ideal has made so little traction in America, and, in part, I would like to quote (well, closely paraphrase) Alex Linder:

        “Absolutely no one in this ‘Movement’ is to be trusted absolutely.”

        The best Ideal, the best Ideas, and the damndest group of incompetents, fools, idiots, half-wits and perverts are out there as the public face of what we all espouse, and support.

        I’m sorry Dr. Oliver felt the way he did towards Harold Covington.

        He is certainly entitled to his beliefs.

        He is certainly wrong.

        For all we can criticize Covington for on a personal level, usually only hearing his opponent’s side of the story, we can not argue with the belief that the Northwest Republic encompasses every good Idea concerning White Nationalism, frame it in whatever terms we may choose, and comprises the perfect Analytical Framework for ANY analysis of our current state of affairs, and, virtually uniquely, what can be actually DONE about them.

        Taken together, essentially, all of Covington’s detractors have accomplished pretty much nothing of substance.

        Oliver?

        Suicide, after having been neutralized by the damn Jews while with the Birchers.

        Klassen?

        Suicide.

        Pierce?

        Died virtually alone, virtually unmourned, and did not leave a functioning organization behind, despite all of the godwill he had built up over the years.

        Anyone who wants to criticize Covington usually criticizes him for some personal shortcoming, real or imagined.

        Let any – or all – of them do half as well as “A Distant Thunder,” and then they can talk all damn day.

        Incidentally, speaking of Dr. Oliver, did Mrs. Kevin Alfred Strom ever call in with her declaration of what happened to Dr. Oliver’s library?

        Now, to brass tacks.

        I have spent more time than I should have trying to answer one quetion: Why have we, essentially, made virtually no headway at all on any substantial front?

        Rallies?

        No one shows up.

        Flyer drops?

        No one responds positively to us.

        Demonstrations?

        Ignored, with the exception of those led by the talented Bill White, whose voice belongs on VNN Radio.

        What do all of our ineffective activities have in common?

        I see two factors at work.

        One, our focus should be on the Vanguard, and a focus of quality, over quantity.

        People will only pay attention to anything we have to say when they are literally faced with desperation. Bill White notes that people respond favorably when they do flyers in blue collar White neighborhoods, even when they are wearing the brownshirt/red swastika armband.

        Two, we must start where we are, and be what we want the world to become.

        None of our Leaders are coming back to save us.

        Rockwell, Pierce, Oliver, you name who you will (David Lane?), all gone, and none coming back.

        So, it’s up to us.

        I have a lot more to say about this in the context of an alternative history biography I have been working on centered around the late Dr. Sam Francis, but let me close with this comment.

        Covington is succeeding, where his detractors have failed, because the Northwest Republic Trilogy – especially A Distant Thunder – define a positive definition of what is possible, where we don’t worry about our Opponents.

        No.

        THEY worry about US.

        It is OUR Power, OUR Energy, OUR Drive to the Stars, OUR Creativity, that they have captured and harnessed against us, and with which we have been unwitting co-conspirators against our Family, and our RACE.

        Metzger had it right; the Parasite is only performing its natural function, feeding off of dead tissues – the places we chose to abandon, for whatever reason.

        Until we become focused on WHO we are, WHAT we are doing, WHy we are doing, and can answer ALL of those question in the Analytical Framework of our Family, as the microcosm of our RACE, our RACE, as the macrocosm of our Family, and RACE as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture, we are allowing our Racial Enemies to define not just the Terms of Engagement, but even Who we are, and What we are.

        I suspect if Oliver was alive today, I could sit down with him for a day or so, and convince him that the Analytical Framework of Covington’s Northwest Republic had all of the Answers, if we only have the courage to ask the proper Questions.

        We keep looking to the Past, that never was, the safe, comfortable Past of our Childhood.

        We MUST look to the Future, and build the Future WE wish, for our Family, our Posterity, and our RACE.

        Open Question for the Class>

        What would Rockwell, Pierce, and Oliver do TODAY?

        Bonus Question:

        HOW would they accomplish these goal(s), and why would they chose those goal(s) over other goals?

        Extra Points:

        What differences would these be between the Goals and Solutions of Pierce, Rockwell, and Oliver, and why?

        Final Question:

        What could you do about it, and why aren’t you doing that TONIGHT?

        New America

        An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!

      3. GB Says:

        Here’s background on Douglas Reed, mentioned in the letters:

        http://www.revisionists.com/revisionists/reed.html

      4. Bret Ludwig Says:

        I very much enjoy this opportunity to read letters from Dr. Oliver. I was in Illinois in the years before his passing and I regret not having known him. I have the highest admiration for him for which it is possible to have for someone.

        Dr. Oliver did physically commit suicide but only after living to 86, and being physically enfeebled to the point where productive work was no longer tenable for him. had he not done so he would have consumed resources as a zombie like Ronald Reagan. In that circumstance it was a noble, as opposed to a cowardly and contemptible act, like the suicides of young and able bodied people because a sex partner dissociated from them or a job loss or something trivial.

        Dr. Revilo Pendleton Oliver, Light of the Aryans.

      5. Fr. John Says:

        “Satan is as mythical as his counterpart, Yahweh-Jesus, and as impotent to do anything for the fools who believe in him and the occult rubbish that goes with the myth.”

        A Christ-denier, and a self-destructive personality to boot.

        Sounds typically Jewish, to me. And equally as damnable as the Deicides.

        NO plan of ‘conquest’ or of ‘success’ will be achieved apart from Credence in the Almighty. NONE. Never has been, never will be.

        For all their vaunted ‘smarts’, all of these ‘leaders’ have done NOTHING, as your own readers admit, to change people’s hearts, precisely because you have never APPEALED to their hearts – via the message of national/racial salvation of the “Israel of God” [Gal. 6:16] i.e., White Adamic mankind who used to be the populace of what used to be called Christendom!

        The ‘jews’ are imposters, both racially and religiously, but they have the ‘myth’ that they are ‘chosen.’ NO purely secular fight against such rhetoric will ever win! You need to see whom God (YHWH God, and his only-begotten son, Christ Jesus) has called ‘his own, who were not his own’ to find the limits of the TRUE Chosen People. Once you have it, appeal to it, nurture it, encourage it, and understand it is as limiting as any ‘state of Israel’ talmudic eisogesis could ever invent! Oliver was right in one utterance- the Jews cannot countenance any other claimant to the the ‘chosen people status’ for it is their biggest MYTH!

        But for the quote that starts this post, God has already judged and damned Oliver for blasphemy. Better to serve the God you doubt exists, than to find out your denial means eternal punishment. Save your soul alive, and appeal to European Christian culture, which has outlived by over 1500 years, anything some Masonic “Experiment in Democracy” has cooked up…..

      6. jimbo Says:

        that Madalyn O’Hair was a poor advertisement for ‘atheism’: a fat, frumpy, femi-twat whose ‘arguments’, @ best!, amounted to ‘the village idiot’s Guide to Atheism’; Duane Gish, the creationist, basically chewed her up and spat her out on some radio show in the l8 1970s, from memory; she should have steered clear of the ‘evolution/creation’ mine-field and focussed on more pertinent points; like, for instance, the satanic nature of the kikez and the clear in-equality of the races!

        (which was also Charles Darwin’s biggest ‘selling point’; re: ‘Descent of Man’; his ‘Origin’ was speculative & tentative re: evolution; how-ever, he was quite emphatic on the superiority of white people over non-whites!)

        successfully ‘khybosh’ the kikez & most of yr current crop of judæo-xtians will ‘abandon ship’; after all: they don’t really worship Jesus Christ: just the jews!

        MS O’Hair or WTF she called her-self wouldn’t last a jew York minute against the current crop of slick creationists they have these days!

      7. Tim Harris Says:

        It always amazes me to find out there are still atheists. Please listen to the Bahnsen-Stein debate, available here:
        https://www.cmfnow.com/index.asp?PageAction=Custom&ID=23
        before making such glib statements.

        Jimbo:
        1. It’s true that most christians worship the jews; but so do most atheists (since jews themselves probably constitute the biggest share of atheists).
        2. Inequality of the races is not a refutation of anything in the Bible.

      8. Sun of a Bitch Says:

        Pagan origins- the bible is a book of astrology:

        http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2403878029697715684&q=christianity+pagan+origins&total=44&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=2

      9. jimbo Says:

        tim harris:

        i/it’s true that most jews are atheists or, rather, secular materialists/secular humanists but are most atheists jews?
        what is an atheist?…..the belief of most white non-xtians could probably best be described as “agnostic” which is, basically, “a cop out”; i would suggest that there are, in fact, very few “intellectually fulfilled” atheists; certainly not in the sense that RPO seems to have been…..any intelligent white person who has carefully thought through ALL the pertinent issues could really be nothing less than a committed National Socialist @ least!….which, of course, makes me doubt the likes of Richard Dawkins who “wears his atheism on his sleeve” but shys away from such logical inferences as eugenics & race & fails to focus his scientific analysis on such clearly bogus socio-political phenomenon as the HollowHoax!

        ii/most xtians don’t believe the Bible…..or, they believe it selectively….few will publicly proclaim a belief in six-day creation, a young/six-thousand-year-old Earth, Noah’s Flood, the Tower of Babel, Jonah & the whale, the plagues of Egypt, Sodom & Gomorrah, David & Goliath &c (many will also try to ‘dodge’ such ‘hurdles’as: the divinity of Jesus Christ, the virgin birth, the resurrection, heaven & hell, the second coming, the rapture, the anti-christ as a jew, the Final Judgement, most people condemned to hell &c….Fred Phelps, despite being a jew/nigga boot-licker to some extent, strikes me as one of the few honest xtians alive to-day!)….they also ‘shy away from’ the clearly anti-semitic statements in the New Testament(many of which have, more likely than not, been edited out….the Gospels, for instance, originally consisted of nearly a dozen different books!) and try to ‘finesse’ the anti-semitism of the early church fathers…even up to the time of Martin Luther!

        the Bible is a problematic book of dubious origins: who knows what bits have been excluded/edited out?….once the jews get their claws on some-thing, you can bet that yr being sold “a defective bill of goods”!

      10. Christards Are Annoying Says:

        God has already judged and damned Oliver for blasphemy.

        Go fuck yourself you stupid jeebus jabbering loon.

      11. Bret Ludwig Says:

        I reject Jesus Christ as my personal savior.

        First, Jesus of Nazareth is almost certainly a wholly fictional character. He isn’t even a composite character like Holly Golightly or Johnny Fontaine-he’s pure fiction, like John Galt, or Mr. Spock.

        Second, he is certainly in literature a reformer of, rather than an opponent to, the Jew deity Oliver calls “The Big Jew”. The Big Jew is not a sensible god. He’s utterly base and self-centered. No White man can regard him in any way other than as did Milton’s Satan.

        LaVey was a Jew, or at least a mischlinge, but he had TBJ pegged when he called him a “sore loser, spoilsport, unjust…” I would add also he’s Public Abortionist Number One.

      12. Bret Ludwig Says:

        I’d also add that Madalyn Murray O’Hair did more for fundo-Christianity than she did for atheism, by presenting such an ugly and offensive face to what is really the only rational view of life. She was fat, smelly, abrasive, foul-mouthed, ill-tempered and generally unnecessarily confrontational. And a lousy parent to boot. I can understand why her son became a fundoli-how else could he rebel from that?

      13. Booger Says:

        Great post Alex! I’ve heard alot about Dr. Oliver since i started getting into the movement.it’s my impression he gave up a “normal” stable life to pursue the struggle for our people.Rare and noble that sort.Too much infighting in this movement from what i see,between christians themselves,and/or non-christians.Personally i could give a shit in what my fellow-travelers believe whether its God,Satan,Hitler,Jay-sus,Swami or the Grand-Poobah!What matters to me is (in modern vernacular)-Do they got my back?How can we save and/or enlighten our people when all most of ‘em care about is who’s going to win the game? and we’re too busy squabbling amoungst ourselves over trivial bullshit.(see recent NSM escapades)

      14. Booger Says:

        Oh yes,i forgot to add i believe in the Big “G” myself,Christianity i see as weakening our people,softening us up for big Jew,and also that Adolf Hitler was sent by God to AWAKEN ARYAN MAN!Chew on that!

      15. New America Says:

        A useful vehicle may well be developing for us in the Christian Framework, and, if nothing else, we should all avail ourselves of this wonderful opportunity.

        It seems more and more likely Dr. James Dobson, of Focus on the Family, is going to form a Third Political Party based around America as a Christian Nation.

        This is simply perfect for us.

        We, at last, will have the foundation for a political organization that will represent, to a substantial degree, interests that at least are sympathetic to ours, and have a strong degree of overlap with ours, certainly at the foundational level.

        Let’s use this useful formulation, paraphrased from Peter Shank:

        Family is the microcosm of RACE.

        RACE is the macrocosm of Family.

        And, RACE is the Living Bridge between Family and Culture.

        We can work within the political framework of Dobson’s new political party, emphasizing the primary points of agreement – FAMILY – and then, work to insure that nothing works to negate the implementation of the Party’s policies in the context of Positive Racism.

        For instance, we would be the Party that would actively get rid of the illegals, and Affirmative Action, in time.

        Something to think about…

        New America

        An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!

      16. Bill Elismann Says:

        Founding a third party as explicitly “Christian” would simply split the GOP into two halves, one of which will simply disappear and its adherents will mostly join the Dems of necessity. The problem is that that half will include many of the most rational and productive people in the GOP today.

        We’d be way better off if the left did something like that.

        Our constitutional republican form of government almost presupposes two parties of any significance-not one and not three or more. None of the current third parties has any particular message or concept enough people consider worthwhile, as evidenced by their total failure to elect anyone.

        The only GOP candidate that could split the party is Giuliani. And he won’t be nominated precisely because too many people rightly fear he would. Unless something drastic happens it’s going to be Romney, Thompson or Brownback.

      17. PraiseJesusSendMoney Says:

        Tim Harris Says:
        11 October, 2007 at 10:51 am
        Please listen to the Bahnsen-Stein debate, available here:

        That link is spam, it’s a commercial site selling MP3s of the debate. It says FREE in bold type but then makes a laughable claim that they can’t allow downloading for free due to the “shopping cart software.”

        They’re fishing for credit card numbers.

      18. New America Says:

        in response to Bill Elismann:

        you wrote:

        Founding a third party as explicitly “Christian” would simply split the GOP into two halves, one of which will simply disappear and its adherents will mostly join the Dems of necessity. The problem is that that half will include many of the most rational and productive people in the GOP today.

        We’d be way better off if the left did something like that.

        in reply:
        The same basic argument could have been made for the Whigs; major structural shifts in the American polity required a new party to come forth, and, essentially, displace and replace the Whigs.

        From Fremont to Lincoln, with Lincoln, to victory.

        Too bad about the Whigs.

        In point of fact, there is really no significant difference in either policy, or practice, between the Democrats, and the Republicans, whether it is on Race, or the economy, or even our expedition to Mesopotamia.

        What do we have to lose?

        As things stand now, the great Republican support of Affirmative Action, and their support for the fifty million illegals from Mexico now in America, means the negation of the Republican Party as anything more than a small, regional rump party.

        you wrote:

        Our constitutional republican form of government almost presupposes two parties of any significance-not one and not three or more. None of the current third parties has any particular message or concept enough people consider worthwhile, as evidenced by their total failure to elect anyone.

        in reply:
        Look at Perot, and how quickly her forced the two other parties to deal with his agenda, one way or another.

        The two parties were so taken aback that they literally rewrote ALL of the election laws overnight, for the sole purpose of blocking the next Perot.

        If Buchanan’s Southern supporters had the intelligence to look past his black VP running mate, knowing that (1) they would not win, and could not win, THAT election, they would have done well enough to qualify for Federal campaign matching funds, in the NEXT election, and establish a legitimate counterforce to the status quo.

        you wrote:

        The only GOP candidate that could split the party is Giuliani. And he won’t be nominated precisely because too many people rightly fear he would. Unless something drastic happens it’s going to be Romney, Thompson or Brownback.

        in reply:
        I think the alternative spelling of “Romney, Thompson or Brownback,” is “President Hillary Clinton.”

        Three men who could never win, as a counterpoint to Giuliani, who seems to be little more than a hope to hold the base together, keeping the Republicans at thirty percent approval, and allowing them to remain on life support while Hilary does her eight year turn.

        If Giuliani split the party, what would we really have to lose?

        The de facto legalization of FIFTY MILLION Mexicans – a policy and practice ACTIVELY supported by the Republicans – as Democrats, will guarantee the end of the Republican Party as a national political force.

        As the late Dr. Sam Francis so astutely noted, when the Republicans run with the support of (1) WHITE men and women, (2) who work for a living, they win, handily.

        Absent this group, the Republicans lose, or win by the narrowest, most unsustainable, of victories.

        Think of the Republican Party and ask Metzger’s Question, “What have you do for YOUR Race today?”

        Not much.

        They remain every bit as strong a supporter of Affirmative Action, and “Hate Speech Laws,” as any Democrat.

        Why not support a new political party that STARTS with the Foundation of RACE, which is FAMILY?

        While we can…

        New America

        An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!

      19. jimbo Says:

        the White Race can survive some from or t’other of xtianity, but it can’t survive the fckn jewz and, to a lesser extent, their attack dogz, the niggaz; the jewz are the deadly enemies of honour, morals, decency, right-thinking & ‘holiness’(how-ever u want to define that); no religion of any form of self-abnegation with altruistic motives is compatible with that pestilential afflction spewed from Hell’s arse-hole called the jew filth plague……for any-thing resembling life to flourish, the jewz MUST DIE!…..KILL the KIKE! ….and LIVE!

      20. GB Says:

        Recently spent some time reading Revilo’s essays, found this citation from Joseph Stalin on anti-semitism:

        Works, Vol. 13, July 1930-January 1934, Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing
        House, 1955, p. 30

        “Anti-Semitism: Reply to an Inquiry of the Jewish News Agency in the United States”

        Joseph Stalin

        In answer to your inquiry:

        National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of cannibalism.

        Anti-semitism is of advantage to the exploiters as a lightning conductor that deflects the blows aimed by the working people at capitalism. Anti-semitism is dangerous for the working people as being a false path that leads them off the right road and lands them in the jungle. Hence Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable, sworn enemies of anti-semitism.

        In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites are liable to the death penalty.

        J. Stalin
        January 12, 1931

      21. Tim Harris Says:

        PJSM says: “They’re fishing for credit card numbers.”

        I too find it annoying that they have to “sell” the download for one cent; it is probably because of legal copywrite issues with the owner. Probably if they simply put a download link up, they would legally be vacating their copywrite privilege in the future.

        I have known the outfit for many years and I assure you as a fellow aryan that they are not fishing for credit card numbers.

      22. pottery » Letters Between Eric Thomson and Revilo Oliver (1993-1994) Says:

        [...] came across this post – Letters Between Eric Thomson and Revilo Oliver (1993-1994) – and thought it was worth sharing. I hope you find it interesting too and take the time to read [...]

      23. Ein Says:

        Jimbo says: — “Madalyn O’Hair was a poor advertisement for ‘atheism’: a fat, frumpy, femi-twat whose ‘arguments’, @ best!, amounted to ‘the village idiot’s Guide to Atheism’ “

        In addition to those things, Madalyn Murray was also a Jew. I am old enough to remember her from the 1960s when she came to national attention. I was still very young, naive, and quite liberal back then, as were all my friends. I followed her story with much interest. She was at that time a social worker in Baltimore who brought a lawsuit to the Supreme Court about banning school prayer. As an outspoken (and quite confrontational) atheist, given to outrageous comments designed to insult and infuriate Christians, she took an enormous amount of abuse in Baltimore (I remember her saying that the neighbors had killed her dog). Even then, I felt that she brought much of this upon herself, and that she even reveled in it and the sympathy she got. She then married a retired marine named O’ Hair (her first hubby was a marine too, named Murray. I forget her maiden name.), left Baltimore where she had made herself extremely unpopular (but famous), and moved to Austin, Texas and started there a national atheist organization.

        Texas didn’t strike me as a very good or likely place for an atheist. The middle of the Bible Belt! It was like going into the lion’s cage to taunt the lion – but something she relished immensely. She was confrontational. Most atheists want no trouble; she sought it out. Anyway, she dropped out of sight after that, or at least out of my sight. I was vaguely aware, from occasional news articles, that she later disappeared, in the 90′s. It was speculated that she had absconded to New Zealand with the missing funds of her organization (hundreds of thousands of dollars, perhaps even more). Her disappearance wasn’t regarded (by the media and police) as particularly surprising, as she was a strange, cranky woman, VERY pugnacious, loud, vulgar, obscene, abrasive, quarrelsome, litigious, obnoxious, as well as insulting and abusive to everyone around her. Her own son said that she couldn’t speak a sentence without using the F-word. Adding obesity to that (needed a double seat in a plane), he claimed that she couldn’t possibly go unnoticed anywhere for even five minutes. He also said that given her talent for self-promotion (much like Al Sharpton today), the most dangerous place for anyone to be was in between Madalyn Murray and a camera!

        As I said, I lost track of her and then forgot. Prompted by this article here on VNN, I just now, out of curiosity, read up on her at Wikipedia. It turns out that she and her family were murdered by an ex-con whom she had hired (for some reason, she favored those types of people) who extorted about 600 thousand dollars of her funds and then disposed of her body. It’s a long and very interesting article. (Not a word in it about Jews, btw.) Madalyn had still more funds, unknown to him, stashed in banks around the world that were untouched (eg. New Zealand); and her surviving son maintains that there is still more hidden money, probably in Swiss banks. She was obsessed with squirreling away money in various countries in case she suddenly had to flee somewhere. (Another Jewish trait?)

        I hadn’t known any of this, but it turns out that Madalyn Murray got rich off of “atheism” and turned it into a very lucrative business. She particularly went after contributions and inheritances from the wealthy. This reminds me so much of the admonition (in “Gypsy”) of Gypsy Rose Lee’s mother, “Ya gotta find a gimmick!” Jews are experts at finding gimmicks, and can turn almost anything into a money-making career. Look how many have made professions of giving advice – from romance to finance – in the newspapers and on TV. All Jews! Madalyn Murray’s “gimmick” was atheism. That’s how she got rich; but it was her undoing.

        As for her Jewish background, I remember reading somewhere, in the 60′s or 70′s – probably in an interview in some off-beat publication like The Realist or Village Voice – her remark that her family were “sort of” Presbyterians”, but were really Jewish. Or that they were “Presbyterians on Sundays but Jewish the rest of the week”. Something like that. After all these years, I can’t remember the exact wording, but there it is.

        This was exactly the same story with Hugh Heffner, by the way — another figure in the public eye back then, who was gradually introducing soft-porn and pushing his “Playboy philosophy” (basically: have sex but don’t have kids). He was allegedly a Presbyterian (or was it Methodist?). But there was another interview I read – 30 or so years ago – in which he admitted otherwise. And, yes “Anton LaVey” , (whom another poster mentions), another outrageous figure of the 60′s counterculture and founder of the Church of Satan, was also a Jew, son of Joseph Levey. This was also at the time (the mid 60′s) when Lenny Bruce (Al Schneider) championed obscene speech (and Catholic-bashing) in public performances, Bob Dylan (Al Zimmerman) was promoting youth alienation, and Hair” first put nudity on stage. And there were Gloria Steinem, Phil Spector, Allan Ginsburg, and many others. All were hailed by the media as “innovative”, “daring”, and “courageous”. Today, some of them, particularly the dead, have reached the status of legends and near saints.

        This was the seminal decade when MLK was marching, cities were burning, “freedom riders” were riding and hippies were rioting. And coincidentally when Paul Erlich published his influential book, “The Population Bomb” (1968) arguing that we were having too any babies, and that the United States could only support a population of 150 million. Ehrlich proposed that “luxury taxes should be placed on layettes, cribs, diapers, diaper services, toys…” and “responsibility prizes” awarded to couples who went at least five years without having children, or to men who got vasectomies. He called for setting up a Federal Bureau of Population and Environment to oversee reducing U.S. population growth. Ehrlich supported changes proposed by Sen. Packwood (R-Oregon) to decrease tax deductions for dependent children. He not only advocated reduced births, he also called for legislative action and he proposed population control by compulsion if necessary, if voluntary methods fail.

        The Realist magazine, by the way, was a very popular (among college kids), irreverent, outrageous, counterculture newsletter or magazine during the 60′s. I had a friend who subscribed to it (or else bought it — perhaps it couldn’t then be sent through the US mail because of the obscenity laws). It was founded by Paul Krasner who was also the founder of the Yippie’s. It was also riddled with Jews (as I now realize, but I was too naive to notice it then). It probably introduced porn and obscene language to an America which was then still unaccustomed to such things. Krasner’s Realist preceded, I think, Al Goldstein’s Screw magazine, which was even more extravagantly obscene and outrageous. I remember The Realist carrying cartoons of Nixon sitting on the toilet, and one of Khrushchev humping Nixon (or vice versa). Incredible for the time! You simply didn’t show presidents that way. People under fifty today wouldn’t understand that this irreverence was considered extremely shocking. No one had ever seen anything like this before. I recall Madalyn (then the new Mrs. O’Haire and now living in Austin) commenting on the Texas-size of her husband’s sexual equipment. That too was simply not done in those days – expecially from a woman! Such speech was incredible to church-going, virtuous, Christian Americans. There were laws against obscenity. But of course, Madalyn Murray O’Haire was not a church-going person (which everyone knew); but few realized that she was not, and had never been, a Christian either. In fact, she displayed an extreme hatred of Christianity which went far beyond being an atheist and used offensive language which most atheists would repdiate. Also, looking back with the acquired wisdom of 40 years, it is no surprise to me that she looked like a duplicate of, say, Ella Abzug or Betty Friedan, and was just as atrocious, publicity-grabbing, and vulgar. Somewhere along the way, Mr. O’Haire must have tired of her, or her mouth, and after a few years he simply dropped out of sight.

        I have nothing to say against atheists or atheism, and will stay away from that subject, but will simply observe that Madalyn Murray O’Hair was one of that army of Jews, particularly crypto-Jews, who slipped in among us and transformed America during the 60′s and 70′s from the formerly white and Christian country that it had always been, and which is now history — only a memory in the minds of those us over fifty. We are now living with the results of their social-engineering and can see them all around us. It’s interesting for me to read the initial comment (quoted at the top) that Madalyn Murray was the worst possible advertisement for atheism and an embarrassment to atheists. I fully agree. She did manage to get rich off it, however. Atheism was her “gimmick”.

        After not even thinking about The Realist for many years (I even had to stop to remember it’s name), I checked Wikipedia, and found a very interesting article about it which brings it all back. It gives some historical insights into what was happening back then, and WHO was making it happen. In retrospect now, it’s easy to fit the pieces together — although we didn’t understand the puzzle then. The article about M.M. O’Haire says nothing at all about Jews. It states that her family was Presbyterian. But no! Officially perhaps, but I remember the statement from her own mouth that her family was Presbyterian on Sundays only.

        http://crimemagazine.com/ohair.htm
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Realist
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Krassner
        http://www.churchofsatan.com/

      24. Ein Says:

        Oops! Meant to write Bella Abzug (above) – not Ella – but that’s Spell Check for you. It turns good words into bad!

      25. New America Says:

        A quick comment re Harold Covington, and his detractors:

        Eric Thomson noted he has written a novel, called “The Chosen One.”

        I have not seen it anywhere, even at Solar General.

        Does anyone know where an online copy of it is?

        Thomson mentions the usual collapsed American social order as part of his novel, but I use this to simply clarify the essential difference between Covington, at his (alleged) worst, and his detractors, at their best.

        If I’m correct, the detractors of Covington criticize him, and ignore the very different intellectual formulation that separates his work from that of his detractors; his work, in general, and the Northwest Trilogy, in particular.

        The difference is really very simple.

        Covington is coming from a Positive Theory of Race.

        Let’s repeat that, in slow motion – virtually ALONE among White Nationalist analysts, Covington is coming from a Positive Theory of Race, and does so with particular clarity in A Distant Thunder.

        This is why I can give copies of A Distant Thunder to my nephews, ask them to read it, mark it up, and sit down and have discussion questions for me about it.

        All too often, far too much of the speculative literature in White Nationalism focuses on us being on bended knee to the parasitical, demonic Jews, with little discussion of how we arrived at that state of affairs. The “solutions” proposed seem, all too often, to center around grabbing the old squirrel rifle, and taking on the most powerful, most organized military force in the history of the world…

        Successfully!

        Virtually NOBODY has addressed these issues in the framework of Positive Racism, except Covington.

        Isn’t our failure to address these issues in the framework of Positive Racism part and parcel of the failure White Nationalism, of the best Idea, and the best Ideas, to make any significant headway in the last fifty years?

        Don’t such writers always assume that, somehow, with a little bit of luck, and a tiny bit of pluck, we shall awaken to a golden dawn, of a country, and a continent, cleansed of the demonic Jews, and their Colored attack animals?

        Here is the question that just nails, in part, why Covington succeeded where his detractors failed:

        OK.

        We’ve won.

        NOW WHAT?

        The legitimate objections to this are simple; that all of the literature somehow assumes, magically, that Ol’ Sparky and his granddad’s ol’ squirrel rifle succeeds where they have always failed.

        Covington addresses this, from both conceptual and technical perspectives, in the Northwest Trilogy.

        Again, no one else has done the disciplined, focused thought needed to define and present a range of possible solutions to the problem, in a feasible Racial context.

        Again, for the sake of argument, let’s assume that, magically, the Continent is ours; lock, stock and barrel.

        NOW WHAT?

        Covington looks to the Positive Theory of Race to raise the issues that matter; issues of government, governance, and structuring of the economy, are all defined loosely enough to allow those us who wish to take the disciplined effort, to “fill in the blanks,” creatively.

        His conceptual and analytical framework allows us to begin to step away from the dream state, and into the world where we can actually start where we are, and actually do something.

        For a change, and a much-needed change, at that.

        From what I can see, and with no disrespect to the gentlemen, Oliver criticizes, and Thomas criticizes.

        Covington not only criticizes, he defines creative solutions based on Positive Racism.

        THAT is what we need more of, and a lot more of, at that!

        New America

        An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!

      26. jimbo Says:

        re: ‘Ein’….O’Hair being yooish does not strike me as surprising in the least; real atheists couldn’t give A STUFF! wtf xtians believe or don’t believe & ‘go quietly abt their business’; the sad part is that traditional, orthodox xtianity was fucked & GUTTED by the kikes in the 1960s (and, to a certain extent, still is!)….but the friggin xtians r so fckn stoopid that they actually worship the very ‘people’ who fckd them up!……pathetic!

        ‘Ehrllich’ is a white-baby butchering POS who’ll just hafta be “offed” ASAP when The Great Day arrives!

      27. gw Says:

        “real atheists couldn’t give A STUFF! wtf xtians believe or don’t believe & ‘go quietly abt their business’”

        Exactly. Only a Jew can take ANYTHING and make a lifetime business out of it.

      28. New America Says:

        A fascinating insight by Eric Thomson above, and a Comment:

        Eric Thomson wrote:

        Oh well, Ernst Zundel kept telling me that the trials were only a steppingstone toward the building of an organization for political action. This was apparently why he adopted some pretty poor trial strategies, in my opinion. Ernst told me that “Anne Burton” said “the jews would kill him if he won.” I asked Ernst then if he were afraid to win, but he said nothing. As we saw, no political organization was created, because Ernst actively repelled everyone who wished to form one, just as he finally repelled me. What were his motives from the beginning?

        in reply:
        IF the ultimate end of all we are doing is a separate nation, in a separate country, for our family, and our Race – and no other goal really makes sense – then some sort of political activity must be undertaken, sooner or later.

        The foremost expression of this, of course, is Covington’s model of the Northwest Republic.

        However, most of us have reasons, however valid they seem (at least for now, for not considering this, if not for ourselves, then certainly for our heirs, our posterity.

        Alex Linder has made reference in the past to the idea that VNN could form a sort of informational/organizational nexus for such political organization, and, in time, it may yet fulfill that role.

        For now, I note that my Comment above, about Dobson’s possible political party, seems to have fallen on deaf ears. Yet, clearly, involving ourselves with the nascent Ron Paul organization, which will develop after the ’08 Elections, as well as the more direct Dobson organization (still to be formed), dooms us to being politically ineffective for, well, for forever.

        Duke argued we should get involved with the political system as it is, today, so we can learn the rules and techniques of getting out the vote, and being involved so we can see how the political system REALLY works, from the ground up.

        I am convinced that we can be divided into three groups:

        (1) the One Percenters, the Vanguard who will Cross The Gap or actively support those in Crossing The Gap, into the founding of a Northwest Republic, one way or another,

        (2) the System Workers, who will actually get involved in the political system after the excellent advice of Dr. Duke, whether with the Ron Paul Meet-Ups, or with the Ron Paul Meet-Ups, while looking to Dr. Dobson’s Family based new political party, and

        (3) the Left-Behinders, who will moan helplessly at how bad things are, while doing nothing at all about it, even to the extent of helping to lay a foundation for their Posterity in a better Somewhere.

        Kalispell, Montana, comes to mind, if only for a long vacation…

        I can not tell you what it is like to Go Home, in the smaller, all-White rural communities, where people look like you, and you can leave your house unlocked during the day (and often, at night), while leaving your keys in the car.

        The psychological chains that keep you trapped are gone, and this frees up an enormous amount of positive energy for you, as well as peace of mind, that WE are right, because We start with the strongest foundation of all – FAMILY, as the microcosm of Race, RACE, as the macrocosm of Family, and RACE, as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture.

        We talk of Family, but, at last, we have a chance, a narrow Window of Opportunity, to actually DO SOMETHING about it, FOR them.

        And not one word of response to my idea about Dr. Dobson’s possible political organization, even here, even on VNN.

        Thomas correctly questioned Zundel’s motives “from the beginning,” in light of Zundel’s subsequent activities.

        It just might be that OUR Posterity will question OUR motives, “from the beginning,” and find us equally lacking.

        “You mean you had the chance to move out, and you DIDN’T? What is that, if not the functional equivalent of Human Sacrifice of the Children of your Family?”

        Good question.

        New America

        An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!

      29. Art Feuer Says:

        MMO’H (as opposed to MM, which means either Mickey Mouse or Marilyn Monroe) was a repulsive and, if I may say, cuntish, piggish female, whom I had the displeasure to deal with myself.

        She was in Texas, but note she was in Austin, a freethinking leftish bastion. She would have been killed in many other places in the state. I was beaten up as a child in 1966 in San Antonio for saying I had doubts about the veracity of the Bible!

        They take Mr. Jeboo dead serious in that state.

      30. New America Says:

        To clarify an error I made above:

        New America wrote:

        Yet, clearly, involving ourselves with the nascent Ron Paul organization, which will develop after the ‘08 Elections, as well as the more direct Dobson organization (still to be formed), dooms us to being politically ineffective for, well, for forever.

        in reply:
        Of COURSE, what I meant to say was NOT ” involving ourselves with the nascent Ron Paul organization, which will develop after the ‘08 Elections, as well as the more direct Dobson organization (still to be formed), dooms us to being politically ineffective for, well, for forever.”

        Simple as that.

        If the Plan for VNN, from Day One, was to develop into some sort of nexus that could develop into an organized political force for White Nationalism, then no better opportunity presents itself than participating in either, or both, of the Paul and (hopefully) Dobson organizations.

        Dobson offers the theme that is at our very foundation – Family First.

        THAT is a winning platform!

        New America

        An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!

      31. New America Says:

        And, for those who don’t think Harold Covington’s Ideas aren’t remotely acceptable, look at:
        http://www.falconrockcommand.com/

        While this is a fictitious site, for now, think of various types of “infections” – ie; cultural, and other terms you could use for, say, “zombies.”

        New America

        An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!

      32. Genghis Says:

        ‘The Chosen One’ is available here :

        http://faem.com/books/

      Leave a Reply

      You may use the following HTML tags in your comments.

      <a abbr acronym b blockquote cite code del em i q strike strong>