26 October, 2007
The “Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007”
Posted by Socrates in jewed Congress, jewed culture, Socrates, thought crime, Zionism at 5:25 pm | 
Permanent Link
This bill is too vague and Orwellian in its wording. At first glance, it appears to be directed at radical Muslims only. But what exactly is an “extremist belief system”? Does that apply to Ku Klux Klan or neo-Nazi ideology as well? Or to any type of White nationalism? To anti-feminist or anti-homosexual beliefs? And what exactly does “force” mean? Is the bill referring to physical force? Financial force? Or to very mild types of force, such as political or social force? Who will decide which actions are, and aren’t, “force”? [1][2]:
[1] this bill came from Jewish congresswoman Jane Harman: [Bill Here]
[2] Harman mentioned as being Jewish: [Here]
26 October, 2007 at 6:05 pm
A BILL
To prevent homegrown terrorism, and for other purposes.
What is “and for other purposes”.
The wording I find most disturbing is page 5 line 4
“should not violate the constitutional
rights,” & page 20 line 14/15,
“shall not violate the constitutional rights”
Sounds like the 2nd ammendments “Shall not be infringed”
We all know how that’s working out.
26 October, 2007 at 7:05 pm
There have always been elite scum who put down their “inferiors” with force. The irony being that the elite are scum, while the “inferiors” are their true betters. To the Catholic Church, the great genius Galileo was a worm to be crushed. To ZOG, gentiles are children to be ruled. Children may not speak out of turn, or else.
This is why elites often end up beheaded or bullet-riddled, no matter what their precautions.
There is a solution to the jewish problem.
27 October, 2007 at 8:54 am
She is definitively jewish:
She explains why she is against this armenian holocaust (the one that really happened and was carried out by the ottoman jews, see [1]):
“As one whose own family was decimated by the Holocaust, I respond very personally to charges that I would deny the existence of savage acts of inhumanity against a group of people because of ethnic, religious or racial differences — be they Jews, Darfurians, Rwandans or Armenians.”
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-harman12oct12,0,3479203.story?coll=la-opinion-center
[1] – http://www.jewishracism.com/JewishGenocide.htm (pdf of 575 pages)
27 October, 2007 at 9:11 am
Chain is on fire about this. Note all the informational and useful wording behind the pictures. He does a good job!
28 October, 2007 at 8:53 am
(quote)
`(2) VIOLENT RADICALIZATION- The term `violent radicalization’ means the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious, or social change.
(unquote)
As I interpret the above, it means a jury would have to find the defendant guilty of INTENT TO CAUSE VIOLENCE, not just guilty of promoting extremist beliefs.
In 1986 I was not found guilty of “Operating a para- military organization”, but rather of “Operating a para-military organization with the INTENT TO CAUSE CIVIL DISORDER.” (This law btw, was written by the ADL and introduced (word for word), by NC state senator Hinson Barnes, and signed into law in 1982).
Therefore, this new federal law, is not all that threatening to VNN or VNNF, as I understand it. It’s main purpose, just like the 1982 anti-paramilitary organization state law, is to intimidate or frighten citizens into NOT exercising specific 1st and 2nd amendment rights.
28 October, 2007 at 1:06 pm
This sounds like just another bill to criminalize belief systems that jews find offensive and threatens their interests. In other words, white nationalism isn’t just another belief system but an “extremist” one that is worthy of harassing, imprisoning, and possibly killing its adherents. Something tells me that, if passed, only patriotic white people will be on the receiving end of this atrocious legislation while the anti-american and anti-white activities practiced by la raza and other non-white groups will be considered free speech. This law, like others, will be selectively enforced.
If one looks at the large increase in jews in governmental posts beginning with the Clinton Administration we also notice police state measures being debated and enacted at a quickened pace. Did anyone expect they would behave any differently than in the Soviet Union once they got their greasy hands on the levers of power?
The jewish iron curtain slowly descends over America.
28 October, 2007 at 5:32 pm
I say give the jews a taste of their own medicine. The largest terrorism network in the USA ARE THE JEWS.
Jews are the ones who want to limit free speech. Speech that preaches the truth about the entities of the low order.
Jews are the ones who file lawsuits against anyone who displays religious wording and symbols in public places; files lawsuits against anyone allowing “The Pledge of Alligiance”; files hate crime charges against any Whites who protect themselves against niggers or files frivolous hate crime charges that have nothing to do hate crimes; and initiates terrorism bills because jews are paranoid of everyone while our freedoms are eliminated and theirs are gained.
Jews are the ones who make death threats and intimidate anyone who believes they should be arrested for all the international crimes they have committed, including the murder of millions of people around the world.
Jews are the ones who go after holocaust disputers, make death threats, sues and jails the individual speaking the truth.
Jews are the terrorists and this is to be spread throughout the USA and the world. Let’s see how quickly they revoke their own bills of “terrorism.”
29 October, 2007 at 12:45 pm
February 28, 1961, John F. Kennedy names Henry Kissinger special advisor