23 November, 2007

“Another American Century or Another American Civil War?”

Posted by Socrates in America, jewed culture, jewed immigration policy, Mexinvasion, Socrates, Western culture at 5:02 pm | Permanent Link

This essay doesn’t mention the Jewish role in the decline of American culture, e.g., the Hart-Celler Act, but it makes some interesting points. America is an “indispensable” country in the world, due to its wealth, influence and superpower status. In fact, the fate of Western culture may hinge on the choices that America makes during the next 40 years [1]:


[1] about the Hart-Celler Act: [Here]

  • 5 Responses to ““Another American Century or Another American Civil War?””

    1. Marwinsing Says:

      Western elite’s agenda serves nobody else’s but their own. Their narrow-minded and myopic ideals run diametrically opposed to the grain of what Western Civilisation always stood for; namely this very concept of ‘Civilisation’ itself. Yet in the process these ‘democratically elected’ beasts are willing to sacrifice those of their own ilk, those who actually built The Civilisation – specifically, The White Race.

      Fjordman is SO on it.

      It’s WHITE REVOLUTION or nothing.


      (footnote: the jew might well be the perpetuator – but he sure has a willing host!)

    2. Tim Pennington Says:

      it was not always this way. 50-60 years ago this state of affairs would not have been tolerated. The jews have cultivated a willing host.

    3. Carpenter Says:

      “Some Americans take comfort in the fact that “at least Mexicans aren’t Muslims, and don’t want to blow up the entire country.” This is true, of course. Islamic immigrants are a special case, with their inherent hostility towards all others.”

      Neocon bull. Muslims in Europe walking around just plotting their next terrorist deed? So where are all these terrorists? There have been a few attacks – but the Muslims number in the millions. This shows that the overwhelming majority of them will never retaliate for the ZOG invasions in the Middle East.

      No, “Muslims” in Europe aren’t the militant Koran-thumpers American neocon-followers imagine them to be. They drink alcohol, their women dress like sluts, they move in gangs, they do drugs. In short, they behave exactly like Blacks and Mexicans.

      But I guess that is too much nuance for most people. It has to be black or white and follow only what you see in the news. Either Arabs are good people, or they are terrorists.

    4. Carpenter Says:

      The Mexican invasion of the United States began decades ago as a spontaneous migration of ordinary Mexicans into the U.S. seeking economic opportunities. It has morphed into a campaign to occupy and gain power over our country – a project encouraged, abetted, and organized by the Mexican state and supported by the leading elements of Mexican society. It is, in other words, war.

      No it hasn’t, and no it isn’t. Even though the Mexican government doesn’t mind, and encourages the migration, there is no plan. Those with low IQs are seemingly incapable of seeing anything in the world other than black-and-white plans and conspiracies. Mexicans, like Arabs, migrate because that is what people do, they go where they are better off. And the Mexicans may wave the homeland flag, and the “Muslims” may use the religious paraphernalia when it suits them, like “Christians” get together on Christmas, but there is no nationalist or religious plan behind it all. To say so leads people astray, and straight into the hands of the Jewish neocons, who want us to believe that Muslims “hate us for our freedom” and the only solution is to invade Israel’s enemies – I mean, the axis of evil.

    5. AmericaFIrst Says:

      Ask any White male who traveled in the 1970’s thru 1980’s. The invasion went BIG time along with coke when Reagan came in to office. Of course it really got going in 1965, but under Reagan 1981 it grew like a disease catagion.

      N.Z. got their invasion going Big time under their supreme bull dyke in 1999.