16 November, 2007

Pakistan

Posted by Socrates in Israel, Israel - the facts, Pakistan, Socrates, War On Israel's Enemies, Zionism at 5:08 pm | Permanent Link

Why is the U.S. government so concerned about politics in Pakistan? Israel. Pakistan has nuclear weapons, so if a hard-line Muslim leader comes to power there, it wouldn’t be good for Israel. Also, America needs allies in that region who might cooperate with U.S. foreign policy concerning Israel and/or the Middle East:

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 12/27/07 Bhutto Assassinated in Pakistan 89% similar
  3. 11/09/09 Pakistan and its Nuclear Weapons: a Threat to Israel and Zionism 78% similar
  4. 11/03/08 What About Syria’s and Pakistan’s Sovereignty? 66% similar
  5. 01/25/08 Wolfowitz Returns 35% similar
  6. 01/30/11 Egypt: Israel’s Problem is America’s Problem 31% similar
  7. One Response to “Pakistan”

    1. ANDREI YUSTSCHINSKY Says:

      Jewish War Drums
      by Andrei Yustschinsky and Charley Reese

      The drumbeat for war against Iran has begun again, led by the kike Sen. Joe Lieberman, the independent Democrat from Connecticut, and the usual pro-Israel krowd. Lieberman “seems” to be under the impression that the U.S. can bomb Iran and not get into a full-fledged war.

      Well, we know all about cakewalks and how they turn into long, bloody and dreary marches. We learned nothing from all the U.S.-Kosher (U) instigated wars of aggression during the last century and apparently some of the people have learned nothing from Iraq, now a fishcakewalk war that has lasted longer than World War II, though not with the same intensity and mass.

      If the sheeny senator, who seems to be one of those who loves war (Like his ugly-deformed war criminal cripto-yid sister Madeleine Albright) as long as he doesn’t have to fight it, really believes that we can attack Iran without Iranian retaliation, then he’s naïve. If he knows better, he’s a liar, and to lie the American people into a second war before the other lied-into war in Iraq is even over is despicable. He should be shunned by all “decent” people. But Lierberman won’t be shunned because most Americans are too brainwashed and cowardly by the controlled media and their bought$$ churches.

      I don’t see how any “honest man” can believe that Iran is a threat to the United States or its neighbors. Iran has not invaded anyone in the past 100 years. Iran has from the beginning insisted that its nuclear program is for peaceful energy purposes, and there has been no evidence – I repeat, no evidence – to the contrary. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty explicitly authorizes countries to enrich uranium. In other words, Iran has not done anything illegal.

      Iran has no intercontinental missiles, and the only country in the Middle East with nuclear weapons is that shitty little country in the Middle-East and that’s Israel. Please note that the United States flatly refuses to endorse the idea of a nuclear-free Middle East. Iran has signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel has refused to sign it. Iran admits international inspectors. Israel flatly refuses to allow international inspectors. The only country in today’s Middle East with weapons of mass destruction and a history of invading and occupying other people’s countries is Israel, which is the governing boss of it’s “docile” puppet, the United States.

      As for Iran’s alleged threat to “wipe Israel off the map,” that is propaganda based on a mistranslation. Nobody in Iran has ever threatened to attack Israel militarily. The accurate quotes from Iranians have been simply that Israel as a Zionist-kike state will eventually collapse, just as the Soviet Union as a communist state did. Iranian officials have even explicitly said they have no desire or intention of attacking Israel.

      You should ask yourself, What is the real motive of people who deal in lies? What is the real agenda of people who wish to paint Iran as a threat to the world? (Remember what a threat they said Iraq was?) Why, if the United States is “really concerned” about preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, has it steadfastly refused to endorse the idea of a nuclear-free Middle East – something Iran and the Arab countries have proposed time and again?

      Finally, of course, there is the matter of deterrence. Deterrence worked against the Soviet Union’s 30,000 nuclear weapons and the means of delivering them. Anybody who says Iran would not be deterred from using a handful of nuclear weapons – assuming it even developed them – is a fool or a liar, and there’s plenty of fools and liars out there boys and girls.

      Furthermore, Iran would gain nothing by attacking Israel, the U.S. or Europe. If all Arab countries would unite, it would be a delicious idea to nuke Israel, but the Palestinans would have to be evacuated first. Americans might disagree with how Iranians choose to run their country, but that doesn’t mean that Iran’s leaders are insane. They are, in fact, intelligent and well-educated.

      As for the United States’ latest claim that Iran is supplying weapons to the Taliban, We simply don’t believe it. The U.S. government has lied and lied and has always lied (going back to WW1) to the gullible &/or stupid American people. It has -zero credibility. Iran is a Shiite country; the Taliban are a fanatical Sunni sect. Iran has foolishly volunteered its assistance during the initial American attack on Afghanistan. Why would Iran suddenly change its mind?

      June 16, 2007

      The original Reese article here: http://www.antiwar.com/reese/?articleid=11144

      Andrei Yustschinsky has been a journalist for 8 years. Mail him at: [email protected] Charley Reese [send him mail] has been a journalist for 49 years.