8 February, 2008

A Follow-Up to Kaminski’s Essay

Posted by Socrates in banking, jewed culture, Socrates at 2:10 pm | Permanent Link

This sheds more light on the matter of banking [1]:

[Article].

[1] Kaminski’s essay, posted February 3: [Here]


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 02/25/15 The NA’s “Who Rules America?” Essay 54% similar
  3. 08/05/08 KAMINSKI: Sarasvati 50% similar
  4. 10/02/09 Kaminski Returns 50% similar
  5. 03/19/08 KAMINSKI: The Last Sermon of Martin Luther 49% similar
  6. 09/30/08 John Kaminski on the Radio 49% similar
  7. 7 Responses to “A Follow-Up to Kaminski’s Essay”

    1. Olde_Dutch Says:

      I agree with the fellow in the earlier thread who said that the jewish ownership, and, or control of the media is the most important problem.

      Banking outside of New York City isn’t all that “jewed”, and even in New York City you have big old gentile banking interests like the Morgan money.

      In the US there is a lot of big Italian banking bread, old Scotch-Irish money like the Mellon fortunes, various olde Anglo Saxon banking fortunes in the South & West, rich Germanics in the heartland, old dutch characters like Trump…

      Jew power in the US is built on the media. Not that jew banking isn’t supportive of jew media, or that the jews don’t have a lock on investment banking in the US which they do! But, investment banking is a speciality that no one on VNN has a jew clue about.

    2. Newe Dutch Says:

      Banking outside of New York City isn’t all that “jewed”…

      Our entire economic system is jewed thanks to the Fed.

    3. Olde_Dutch Says:

      Who appointed the jews to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors? Answer: Either Bush or Clinton. LOL.

      If the jews can’t corrupt it—they want to get rid of it.

    4. Newe Dutch Says:

      That article provides a nice summation of how the jews have used their usury racket as a weapon against Europe and the West. (I’m surprised it didn’t specifically mention the jewish role in creating the Fed, though.)

      The author uses the respectable-sounding word “bankers” to describe the jews he names but “usurers” is far more accurate and appropriate.

      The jew/usury connection was common knowledge for many centuries and the word “usurer” is a well-established synonym for jew in the English language.

    5. Socrates Says:

      Olde_Dutch Says: “Who appointed the jews to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors? Answer: Either Bush or Clinton. LOL.”

      Rumor has it that members of the Board of Governors are appointed (selected) from a list of names provided by the Federal Reserve bank’s shareholders. I’m not sure if that’s true, but if so, then that puts the matter in a whole different light. Maybe a reader can provide more information about that?

    6. Olde_Dutch Says:

      Why are there 3 jews on the Supreme Court? Get my drift?

    7. gw Says:

      “Why are there 3 jews on the Supreme Court? Get my drift?”

      Please explain.