16 April, 2008
It’s Occupation, Not War
Posted by Socrates in Iraq, jewed foreign policy, Socrates, War On Israel's Enemies, Zionism at 9:33 pm | 
Permanent Link
Posted by Socrates in Iraq, jewed foreign policy, Socrates, War On Israel's Enemies, Zionism at 9:33 pm |
Permanent Link
16 April, 2008 at 11:06 pm
Charlie Reese is always good stuff to send to average Americans. He is remarkably inoffensive and is someone easy for 50+ year-old White males to relate-to.
17 April, 2008 at 1:50 am
Good old Charlie neglects to mention the main reason why we are occupying Iraq in the first place. We are there because Saddam was rewarding the families of suicide bombers, 25,000 Pre-Bush dollars, to blow up Israeli outdoor cafes, which put a huge damper on Israeli tourism. That it is costing 3 trillion dollars and 4 thousand American lives, is of little consequence to American and Israeli jews who pushed for this war. If it is Good for the Jews, then it is Good for the Jews. Period.
17 April, 2008 at 8:53 am
That “it’s occupation, not war” is old news for us evil white racists. VNN’s own Max Hadden wrote that same thing years ago saying that the comparison of the US in Iraq to Vietnam is wrong and that the right comparison is the Jewish occupation in Palestine.
These “Johnny come lately’s” like Reese who finally get a eureka nugget of reality are funny. The real nuggets of information they need to spread are a) africans and mexicans aren’t our equals, b) whites are dying, and c) kikes are to blame and need to be removed from our presense along with the other non-whites, either vertically or horizontally if necessary.
zoomcopter, you can pretty well guarantee that anything negative about Saddam Hussein is a lie from the kikenvermin. Yeah, sure the Israelis main income was from tourisim and suicide bombers shut it down and that’s why we went to war. LMAO. The Haifa pipeline, the plan for Greater Israel, etc., had nothing to do with it I suppose? Sure.
17 April, 2008 at 9:16 am
b) above should be “the white race is dying”
17 April, 2008 at 9:28 am
How could he write this article without naming the jew?
18 April, 2008 at 8:52 am
“How could he write this article without naming the jew?”
Because “he is remarkably inoffensive and is someone easy for 50+ year-old White males to relate-to.”