16 June, 2008

Not Exactly the Dead Sea Scrolls, But…

Posted by Socrates in Bradley R. Smith, holo-factualists, Holocaust, holocaust racket, Socrates at 9:50 pm | Permanent Link

by Bradley R. Smith: [Here].


  • 7 Responses to “Not Exactly the Dead Sea Scrolls, But…”

    1. abe foxman Says:
      17 June, 2008 at 8:00 am

      I’m surprised Bradley Smith seeks to debate Jews. They are control freaks who would never ever accept any evidence contrary to their views…even if it was presented in such a way as to make it undeniable.
      Their natural reaction would be to gnash their teeth and wail at the moon.
      They are psychotic. A race of nobodies with nothing other than a high opinion of themselves.
      Just read one or two of the comments alluding to holohoax skeptics being called cranks.

    2. zoomcopter Says:
      17 June, 2008 at 12:32 pm

      I agree with Abe, they are control freaks who never accept evidence which contradicts their views. They know one crack in their wall of lies will bring down the whole con-job. While in the second hand bookstore, I looked in vain, for a reference to Jewish concentration deaths, in all of Winston Churchills 6-8 volumes of WW2. There was none. The event was fabricated, plain and simple.

    3. MB Says:
      17 June, 2008 at 3:16 pm

      Yes, Mr. Smith is trying to expose their irrationality, for all to see.

    4. Marwinsing Says:
      18 June, 2008 at 10:48 am

      Yes, having followed Mr Smith’s arguments in this exhaustive thread all Bradley is asking is what have the Jews got to hide? Nazi “war-crimes” against Jews pale in insignificance against, say, Jap experiments upon Chinese subjects (1st half C20th), Hiroshima/Nagasaki, Ukraine 1932-33, Rwanda, Serbia, Palestine – and now us whiteys in South Africa – ugh I could go on and on and on…

      You decide.

    5. Marwinsing Says:
      18 June, 2008 at 10:56 am

      Oh yeah – not forgetting Armenia circa 1914 – 1939…

      Bugger their Holohoax™.

    6. abe foxman Says:
      19 June, 2008 at 7:18 am

      Correction. It should read
      If one did a study, it would be hard to find a country more loathsome of jewery and its fuckery.

    7. abe foxman Says:
      19 June, 2008 at 7:22 am

      Marwinsing says
      Nazi “war-crimes” against Jews pale in insignificance against, say, Jap experiments upon Chinese subjects

      Well that’s really a crock! It’s obvious that anyone who reads on the issue would have a different opinion. To this reader, the vilification of Germans goes hand in hand with the vilification of Japanese. Most don’t realize that the same stinking jews are behind both, the simple reason being that both countries refused to have anything but the most distant relations with international banking (jewery) and openly refute the notion that jews sit on the top and dictate. Japan even follows that line today. If one did a study, it would be hard to find a country more loathsome of jewery and its fuckery.
      For their trouble, they were smashed as badly if not worse 60 years ago by unsuspecting whites who are now just realizing what fucking idiots they were.
      Maybe the following link will enlighten if not show history when not spewed from a kosher pen.

      http://www.jiyuu-shikan.org/e/exploding.html

      The simple fact is the media are controlled by jews. They manipulate the news to prove THEIR point. If they can’t sway readers with borderline news, they’ll create it.