12 August, 2008

Why No Asylum for White South Africans?

Posted by Socrates in Africa, black rule, dispossession & destruction, double standards, immigration, jewed Congress, jewed culture, jewhad, Socrates, South Africa at 1:51 am | Permanent Link

Ruined by the self-chosen, South Africa is an abscess ruled by negroes. Any White man with an ounce of sense is trying to flee S.A. But why does the U.S. government allow Black African refugees – e.g., Somali Bantus – to move to America, but not White African refugees?

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 09/06/09 Canada Reconsiders Giving Asylum to White Man After Negroes Complain 41% similar
  3. 08/20/18 South Africa: the Black Government Will Seize White Farms. What Will the Global Response Be? 37% similar
  4. 06/15/19 The “Slavery Reparations” Hearings in Congress Next Week, or, Getting Revenge on Whitey Again, or, Why Not Focus on Modern African Slavery? 32% similar
  5. 12/27/19 America’s Politicians Are Committing White Genocide (i.e., The Eurocide) 32% similar
  6. 03/05/14 Scotland to Give African Queers Asylum 32% similar
  7. 72 Responses to “Why No Asylum for White South Africans?”

    1. Scipio Americanus Says:

      Christards Are Annoying:

      The christard who calls himself “Fr. John” was the one who fired the first shot on VNN when he implied (on another thread) that Mr. Oliver was burning in hell for his rejection of christardanity.

      Look at the bright side, both of us, being non-believers, will have something other than fire and brimstone to look forward to: an eternity of illuminating conversations with the one and only Revilo P. Oliver! “Fr. John” should be careful for The Lord would surely not be pleased with his depiction of Hell as Nirvana. LOL!

      Scipio Americanus

    2. Sri Sreggin Das, Mystic Yogi of the Kali Yuga Says:

      Good points, Scipio.

      Sad, but, I think, true. But I take comfort in the fact that it was Aryan genius that took this middle-Eastern cult and made it the majestic force that it was, with all its faults.

      But even in Christianity, so much seems to have been borrowed from Aryans, and reworked, just as in the Old Testament so much was borrowed from the Persians and put into the writings as if it were the words of Jahweh himself. Several worthy books put forth the thesis that Christianity was just a Jewish version of a Mystery Cult, and “The Jesus Puzzle” , in particular, makes a good case.

      Christianity served as an expression of our beliefs. That vehicle has run its course; it is constantly needing repairs and is even dangerous for us to drive. We must now look for another.

    3. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      Nice video about the bible being a book of astrology:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQLD59fK_Iw&feature=related

    4. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      Parts 2 and 3 of above:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_E0vfP79yE&feature=related

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyXIeB1qI6w&feature=related

    5. Christards Are Annoying Says:

      “Indeed, it is not Christianity per se but rather the collapse of Christian faith that has brought us to the edge of the abyss.”

      This is a whitewash, pure and simple.

      Christardanity was/is a jewish trojan horse.

      The seeds of destruction contained within this trojan horse were there all along waiting for the right opportunity to germinate and, not surprisingly, that’s exactly what happened when said opportunity arrived.

      The book you cited is dated to the year 1973 and appears to reflect RPO’s thoughts on the subject of religion at an earlier stage.

      His later writings about christardanity were openly hostile (he referred to it as a “spiritual syphilis” among other things).

      I read practically every essay he wrote for Liberty Bell and I can’t remember him ever expressing any sentiments that resemble the ones in that book.

    6. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      IS-RA-EL

      IS- rom ISIS

      RA- Egyptian Sun God

    7. Christards Are Annoying Says:

      The term “white trash” is a vile racial slur used by jews and jewntiles everywhere to disparage white people who work for a living and has nothing to do with perverted instincts, nihilistic desires or criminal intentions.

      Whites who act like non-whites should simply be referred to as “trash” not “white trash”.

      Stop echoing the enemy.

    8. Heinrich Himmler Jr. Says:

      Unfortunately, CAA, there ARE such creatures as White Trash. Not every White person is worth a damn, you know. In fact, some Whites are as bad, if not worse, than a Jew or a Nigger.

      But I’m REALLY annoyed at these Christards who take up valuable space with their goddamn epic-length posts. If you can’t say what you have to say in just a few pithy lines, then please SHUT UP!!!! Besides, the only people I see in church these days are little old ladies. That’s all church is, a Sunday morning social club for little old ladies. The only male in there is usually the fruity priest. How can any heterosexual White Man be interested in that boring church crap? It’s like going to see a chick flick starring Cher and Olympia Dukakis every Sunday morning. Churches and religious organizations in general are just tax-exempt, money-making RACKETS. What’s more, the Bible is the worst written, worst edited piece of literature I know of.

      Whitey really needs to grow up and stop believing in all this middle eastern fairy tale bullshit.

    9. Scipio Americanus Says:

      CHRISTARDS ARE ANNOYING:

      “The term “white trash” is a vile racial slur used by jews and jewntiles everywhere to disparage white people who work for a living and has nothing to do with perverted instincts, nihilistic desires or criminal intentions.”

      BOVINE FECIES! The term ‘white trash’ has nothing to do with white working class people but rather the unsavory conduct of certain white folks who may or may not fall into that category; specifically it refers to a state of being as well as the quality and manner of how one conducts oneself.

      My Grandfather was a dignified, hard working, honest, blue-collar working class white man who used the term ‘white trash’ to describe those white people who were worthless, irresponsible, dishonest, and a drain on society. He had some other choice words to describe them too but I’ll spare you the pain by not listing them.

      You obviously are not the brightest star in the sky, old boy, for you ignore the fact that many of the finest spokesmen on behalf of our race have used the term.

      Here are a few examples:

      REVILO P. OLIVER:

      “Now the voters are faced with a choice between Lord Bushy and a mongrel on whom respectable niggers will look down, recognizing him as a “piece of poor WHITE TRASH”* Plain self-respect obliges us to choose to serve Bushy, who, to everyone’s astonishment, has, since Buchanan announced his candidacy, shown an unwonted respect for American interests.”

      * ‘Poor’ refers to quality, not to income. Before the Jews succeeded in mobilizing the niggers as a weapon against us, there was a social structure in all communities that contained a considerable number of blacks: 1) White people, always recognized as superior; 2) Decent “colored folk,” who took pride in the Aryans who employed them; 3) “WHITE TRASH,”” persons whom respectable Whites regarded as unacceptable and untrustworthy or whose conduct evinced dishonesty or lawlessness; and, barely below them, 4) “no-‘count niggers,” who were shiftless, disinclined to work, and criminally inclined.)

      — THE RAMPAGING OUTLAW, Liberty Bell August 1992

      “Mandela, with the approval of such WHITE TRASH, orated cleverly to urge the niggers in this country to start putting the American swine in their places”

      — SURPRISE! SURPRISE?, Liberty Bell October 1990

      GEORGE LINCOLN ROCKWELL::

      “I listened and relaxed my foot pressure on the brake and while we moved through the intersection he continued, “After that, we must turn our efforts in the direction of our race. It needs to be pruned, and pruned very severely, because it is being choked to death by WHITE TRASH.”

      — FACE TO FACE WITH GEORGE LINCOLN ROCKWELL by Robert Frenz, 17 November 2000

      http://www.faem.com/edward/rockwell.htm

      An anonymous white nationalist referring to Eric Gliebe of the National Alliance regarding his desire to produce rap music and peddle it to supporters wrote:

      “This kind of WHITE TRASH is not and can never be the foundation of any creative enterprise.”

      http://www.overthrow.com/lsn/news.asp?articleID=7687

      BILL WHITE:

      An entry on his blog entitled ‘WHITE TRASH’:

      “At least three of the people in this photograph are federal informers, and two are private informers working for the Southern Poverty Law Center. Hint: If you go near a “white” organization and it looks like a cross between a biker gang and a homosexual “bear-man” organization, you’re in the wrong place.”

      http://www.overthrow.com/blog/?tag=white-trash

      THE PHOTO IS QUITE REVEALING — IT EPITOMIZES THE TERM ‘WHITE TRASH.’

      “BTW, anyone who uses the term “white trash” should have their tongue cut out with a machete.”

      Does that include my Grandfather, Robert Frenz, Revilo P. Oliver, George Lincoln Rockwell and many other white race patriots who used the term to describe assholes like you? Discerning minds would like to know.

      PS: Please proceed to open mouth and insert foot…and while you’re at it — CHOKE ON IT!

      Scipio Americanus

    10. Scipio Americanus Says:

      CHRISTARDS ARE ANNOYING:

      The book you cited is dated to the year 1973 and appears to reflect RPO’s thoughts on the subject of religion at an earlier stage.

      WRONG. It does not reflect his earlier thoughts but constitutes his official position on the matter. Indeed, he followed that up many years later in a book entitled The Jewish Strategy which wasn’t even published until 8 years after his death.

      Here are his relevant remarks from The Jewish Strategy as taken from Chapter 12 of the book entitled ‘Chrsitianity’:

      I think I have a greater sympathy for Christianity than my readers imagine, for I not only recognize it as a belief that was for a long time part of our civilization and produced such splendid monuments as the great cathedrals, but I also regard it as having been a consolation and boon to the great majority of our own people and one that I am sorry so many must now do without. (This is something quite different from the social utility of supernatural sanctions that may be the indispensable basis of a generally accepted and observed morality.) My feeling for Christianity is, I think, expressed by what I consider one of the best poems of Sir William Watson, “The Churchyard.”

      I wandered far in the wold,
      And after the heat and glare,
      I came at eve to a churchyard old:
      The yew trees seemed at prayer.

      And around me was dust in dust;
      And the fleeting light; and Repose;
      And the infinite pathos of human trust
      In a God whom no man knows.

      It is that infinite pathos that touches me deeply. Sunt lacrimae rerum, if you remember your Virgil….

      …For the deplorable acceptance of Christianity by the ignorant barbarians of our race, I have tried to account in my book, Christianity and the Survival of the West. I would now change nothing in that discussion except to make it more emphatic, for in the years since I wrote it, I have come to the conclusion that, with only numerically insignificant exceptions, the Christians are useless in any effort to preserve our race, and that our domestic enemies are, from their standpoint, well advised to subsidize, as they are now doing, the ranting of evangelical shamans and the revival of menticidal superstitions by every means, including the hiring of technicians who can pose as “scientists” and “prove,” by subtle or impudent tricks, the “truth” of the flimsiest hoaxes and the most preposterous notions.

      The development of Christianity in all the sects of the Western world during the past two centuries has been the progressive elimination from all of them of the elements of our natively Aryan morality that were superimposed on the doctrine before and during the Middle Ages to make it acceptable to our race and so a religion that could not be exported as a whole to other races. With the progressive weakening of our racial instincts, all the cults have been restored to conformity with the “primitive” Christianity of the holy book, i.e., to the undiluted poison of the Jewish originals. I should, perhaps, have made it more explicit in my little book that the effective power of the alien cult is by no means confined to sects that affirm a belief in supernatural beings.

      As I have stressed in other writings, when the Christian myths became unbelievable, they left in the minds of even intelligent and educated men a residue, the detritus of the rejected mythology, in the form of superstitions about “all mankind,” “human rights,” and similar figments of the imagination that had gained currency only on the assumption that they had been decreed by an omnipotent deity, so that in practical terms we must regard as basically Christian and religious such irrational cults as Communism and the tangle of fancies that is called “Liberalism” and is the most widely accepted faith among our people today. I am a little encouraged that today some of the more intelligent “Liberals” are at last perceiving that their supposedly rational creed is simply based on the Christian myths they have consciously rejected.

      Thus, RPO clearly makes a distinction between ‘Primitive Christianity’ and its modern equivalent, ‘Judeo Christianity’ (both which are wholly destructive to our race) with Western Christianity (which served our race and civilization for over a thousand years.) As I pointed out earlier, this distinction should be made in order to avoid confusion on the matter.

      His later writings about christardanity were openly hostile (he referred to it as a “spiritual syphilis” among other things). I read practically every essay he wrote for Liberty Bell and I can’t remember him ever expressing any sentiments that resemble the ones in that book.

      After making the distinction for many years, he finally dropped it given the fact that readers of the Liberty Bell were already well informed of his position on the matter. When he attacks ‘Christianity’ in the liberty Bell, he is actually attacking the modern, degenerative form of it — and rightfully so!

      This is a whitewash, pure and simple.

      Are you claiming that RPO was whitewashing the Jews and that he was actually a philosemite?

      His later writings about christardanity were openly hostile (he referred to it as a “spiritual syphilis” among other things).

      Yes, he was openly hostile to what Western Christianity had degenerated into and rightfully so. Clearly, what passes as ‘Christianity’ today is destructive to our race and should be attacked for the same reasons we should attack its secular counterpart, known as “Liberalism,” which is the other side of that kosher coin.

      Scipio Americanus

    11. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      “FECIES” no such word.

      White trash means there are trashy people other than niggers and mexicans- goodnesss comes from Whites, not all Whites are good. The expression is semi-masochistic honesty.

    12. Christards Are Annoying Says:

      “…[white trash] refers to a state of being as well as the quality and manner of how one conducts oneself.”

      No, it doesn’t.

      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=white+trash

      As I said, “white trash” refers to working-class (poor or impoverished) whites and that’s exactly how it’s used by jews and jewntiles.

      If you want to try to redefine words that have well-known well-established meanings, that’s up to you.

      Don’t expect me to go along with it, though.

    13. Christards Are Annoying Says:

      “Please proceed to open mouth and insert foot…and while you’re at it — CHOKE ON IT!”

      I’m not sure what triggered your sudden hissy fit but right back at ya, buddy.

    14. Heinrich Himmler Jr. Says:

      Is it any wonder the White Race is going down the drain? All these pointless arguments about what the term “White trash” means, or whether Christ was a Jew or an Israelite, all the scholarly refutations of this or that……..Meanwhile, the beaners are invading your town, the niggers are raping your wife, the Chinks and the wogs are taking your jobs away, the Hebes are trying to start WW3……….Please, reorganize your priorities, people!

    15. Scipio Americanus Says:

      SHABBOS SHABBAZZ:

      “FECIES” no such word.

      Please excuse the typographical error; it should read ‘feces.’ Bovine feces = Bull shit.

      Scipio Americanus

    16. Scipio Americanus Says:

      CHRISTARDS ARE ANNOYING:

      As I said, “white trash” refers to working-class (poor or impoverished) whites and that’s exactly how it’s used by jews and jewntiles.If you want to try to redefine words that have well-known well-established meanings, that’s up to you.

      It was the Jews who redefined the term in order to demonize white working class people to drive an artificial wedge between whites of various occupational categories. RPO provided the proper, long standing definition of the word which I posted above as taken from his article in the Liberty Bell. Here’s the quote again:

      “WHITE TRASH,” persons whom respectable Whites regarded as unacceptable and untrustworthy or whose conduct evinced dishonesty or lawlessness; and, barely below them.”

      Of course, all dictionaries today are going to reflect politically correct definitions of words and phrases as demanded by the Jews. Regardless, you have committed a serious error given that you have dropped the context in which the word was employed. Obviously, I am not a Jew nor am I a Judeophile , hence my use of the word refers to the actual definition of ‘white trash’, and not the artificial, Jewish definition, which you embrace.

      But all of this nonsense about definitions constitutes nothing more than a RED HERRING on your part to redirect the argument away from my original contention which was to point out that the so-called white nationalist movement is filled with degenerates, perverts, criminals and other unsavory types — creatures like YOU! Only a sick-minded soul would come up with a line about cutting people’s tongues out with a machete. That’s something I would expect from a black savage from the Congo and not from a civilized white man of the West.

      Scipio Americanus

    17. Scipio Americanus Says:

      CHRISTARDS ARE ANNOYING:

      I’m not sure what triggered your sudden hissy fit but right back at ya, buddy.

      LIAR! You damn well know what triggered it. Here’s the full context once again: You stated: “BTW, anyone who uses the term “white trash” should have their tongue cut out with a machete.” After providing the proper definition of the term along with examples of its use by prominent men, I then asked you the following question: “Does that include my Grandfather, Robert Frenz, Revilo P. Oliver, George Lincoln Rockwell and many other white race patriots who used the term to describe assholes like you? Discerning minds would like to know. Please proceed to open mouth and insert foot…and while you’re at it — CHOKE ON IT!”

      You have not answered my question so I will ask it again: Do you believe Robert Frenz, Revilo P. Oliver, George Lincoln Rockwell and others should have their tongues cut out with a machete (your words) for using the term ‘white trash’? Yes or no?

      Scipio Americanus

    18. Scipio Americanus Says:

      HEINRICH HIMMLER JR.:

      Is it any wonder the White Race is going down the drain? All these pointless arguments…Please, reorganize your priorities, people!”

      There is nothing “pointless” about discussing and clarifying the issue of Christianity given the fact that it was the religion of the West for half of its existence and has had a profound impact on our race and civilization. Furthermore, there is nothing “pointless” regarding the official position of one of our race’s most prominent spokesmen on the matter. The subject of Christianity should be dealt with intelligently and seriously rather than demeaning the religion and its adherents in a crude and brutish manner as is commonly practiced by posters here on VNN.

      In addition, you are refusing to distinguish between those who initiate trouble with those who stand up to the trouble-makers. The degenerate who calls himself ‘Christards Are Annoying’ is a trouble-maker who has been caught in a number of bold-faced lies and who refuses to answer direct questions posed to him. Frankly, his manner resembles that of an agent provocateur sent in to stir up ‘shit.’ Regardless, whether you want to admit it or not, VNN is filled with ignorant rabble who have given this board an infamous reputation for promoting a debauched form of white nationalism which is obviously counterproductive to the interests of our race.

      So spare me the patronizing remark about “priorities,” JR. The First Priority is to cleanse the Augean stables of human excrement like ‘Christards Are Annoying’ and other vermin who stink up this and other discussion boards. Until this is accomplished, “White Nationalism” will continue to remain a non-movement movement. Just as bad money drives out good money (Gresham’s Law), bad posters drive out good ones. Indeed, given the piss-poor quality and psychotic proclivities demonstrated by many posters here at VNN, the Jews would be best advised to subsidize this endeavor given that it coddles the worst elements of our race at the expense of the best.

      PS: I would highly recommend that you change your moniker. ‘Heinrich Himmler’ was a traitor who betrayed his loyalty oath to his Fuehrer by attempting to negotiate behind the scenes (to save his own skin) with the sadistic creatures who bombed Germany back into the stone age during the late stages of World War Two. Upon discovering this treachery, Adolf Hitler stripped him of his command and ordered his arrest. Unfortunately, Himmler was able to evade arrest but later died a coward’s death by taking his own life shortly after surrendering to the allies disguised as a common soldier. The name Heinrich Himmler, much like his American counterpart Benedict Arnold, became a byword for TRAITOR!

      Scipio Americanus

    19. Scipio Americanus Says:

      SRI SREGGIN DAS, MYSTIC YOGI OF THE KALI YUGA:

      Good points, Scipio.

      Thank you, sir.

      Scipio Americanus

    20. Heinrich Himmler Jr. Says:

      SERPICO AMERICANUS:

      You have made some salient points…..I don’t necessarily agree with all of them, but at least you are being honest. Actually, I think the level of discourse on this site is superior to anything else I’ve read online. “Christards” may be a “ringer”, but many racially concious Whites, including Der Fuhrer himself, had strong reservations about Christianity. Besides, there are literally thousands of versions of Christianity, many of them in open conflict with each other. Which version would you have us subscribe to?

      I know about Himmler’s fall from grace at the end of WWII….. It’s just that all you have to do is mention this man’s name or show his photograph and the Jews fall silent with fear. I LIKE THAT!!!!!Besides, he did have a lot of good qualities, both as a White family man and as a National Socialist leader.

      I would hate to see this fine discussion forum degenerate into a Hal Turner-style rhetorical barroom brawl. Most of the Internet is either porn, gambling or advertising, so I’m genuinely grateful for this website and for the opportunity to state my anti System views.

    21. Heinrich Himmler Jr. Says:

      SERPICO AMERICANUS……..

    22. Heinrich Himmler Jr. Says:

      SERPICO AMERICANUS…….

      I am aware of Himmler’s fall from grace at the end of WWII. But that man’s name and his image continue to fill the Jew with FEAR. Besides, Himmler was a good White family man and NS leader.

      Many racially concious Whites, from Neitzsche to Paine to Celsus to Franklin to Bertrand Russell, have been skeptical of Christianity, not just Christards are Annoying. Even Der Fuhrer himself had serious reservations about that religion.

      You may have problems with these WN websites and forums, but please consider the fact that most of the Internet is either porn, gambling or advertising. This is one of the few places left in our “free” society where Whites can still speak out against the System and those who control it.