28 November, 2008

Interracial Rape Statistics

Posted by Socrates in black crime, black culture, black stats, blacks, crime, crime rates by race, race, racial differences, rape, Socrates at 9:40 pm | Permanent Link

Blacks prey on Whites with alarming frequency, but Whites avoid raping Blacks:

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 07/13/14 Interracial Rape 60% similar
  3. 01/09/08 New Jersey Apologizes for Slavery 57% similar
  4. 08/31/14 Pay Reparations to Blacks? No Way 54% similar
  5. 03/03/18 Blacks Got Payback, and They Are Still Getting It, Therefore We Whites Owe Them Nothing 50% similar
  6. 08/08/13 Busing: Another Way to Ruin White Suburban Culture 45% similar
  7. 18 Responses to “Interracial Rape Statistics”

    1. Zarathustra Says:

      I’ll betcha at least half of the so-called “White on Black” rapes were not perpetrated by Whites at all, but rather by Mestizos. As we all know, Mestizos are counted as Whites when they commit crimes (to hide the fact that Mestizos are more prone to criminal behavior than the fully-evolved), but are counted as Mestizos when they are the victims. The other half of so-called White on Black rapes are probably just Tawanna Brawley-style hoaxes.

    2. Howdy Doody Says:

      To any one reading here, please check the actual facts of the info above if you don’t believe it. Under Janet Reno/Clinton they did start counting Mezzytizo’s as White for Rape, murder, etc. to boost our crime numbers.

      So when a Messycan murders a Black in CA. the fed stat’s show him as White.

      Insane, but true.

    3. Vaultner Says:

      “but Whites avoid raping Blacks:”

      That’s because niggresses are among the ugliest females in the world, literally putting lipstick on a pig, with all the feminine grace of a stretched out chimp.

      Besides that White males are not the animal missing link that the nigger is.

      I bet the only time a nigger rapes a niggress is if she owes him money or something along those lines.

      The rest of the time it’s pure racially hatred, get back at Whitey.

      It’s a fucking race war & we’re legally not aloud to do anything.

    4. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      “. . .literally putting lipstick on a pig. . .” Literally?

      http://bovinefeces.com/press/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/lipstickpig.jpg

    5. Cpt. Candor Says:

      Vaultner said:
      “That’s because niggresses are among the ugliest females in the world, literally putting lipstick on a pig, with all the feminine grace of a stretched out chimp.”

      I notice that the “Black” female models/celebrities that make it on the magazine covers are usually mulattos or similar, generally having narrower noses and non-prehensile lips, à la Halle Berry, in an effort by HollyJewYork to cultivate as attractive a Negro image as possible.

      Vaultner also said:
      “Besides that White males are not the animal missing link that the nigger is.”

      What’s always puzzled me about Negros is that their naturally kinky hair structure is not found on any apes! What the hell happened? Did ancient Atlantean scientists manage to successfully splice gorillas and sheep??

    6. gw Says:

      “but Whites avoid raping Blacks”

      Who would WANT to?

    7. Zarathustra Says:

      Interesting point about Negroes and their kinky hair, Captain. Perhaps it’s a situation where the aboriginal ancestors of the Negro race had straight or wavy black hair (like every other race of people did) and it just got more kinked up in subsequent generations due to some localized genetic peculiarity?

      I’m sure we’ve all noticed that whenever a Negro becomes rich and famous (usually as a trivial sports or entertainment celebrity with a large number of idiot White fans), the first thing he does is to get himself a light-skinned, high-yellow trophy wife or if possible a White blonde to show he’s “arrived”. There is definately a “pecking order” in Negro society, with the light-skinned Andrew Youngs, Coretta Scott Kings and Julian Bonds at the very top. But we’re not supposed to comment on such things.

    8. gw Says:

      As I recall from Anthropology class, the kinky hair aids in evaporating perspiration, thus helping to cool the body.
      That’s plausible, I suppose.

      But what about Ceylonese and and Indians of the Deccan who are pitch black, and yet have straight hair? And why don’t chimps and orangs have kinky hair? And monkeys? And aborigines? I never thought to ask the prof this when I had the chance. (I’m sure he wouldn’t have like it, being black himself.)

    9. Curious Says:

      “The rest of the time it’s pure racially hatred, get back at Whitey. ”

      get BACK ?!?

    10. Vaultner Says:

      Curious,

      Yeah in their minds we owe them.

    11. Zarathustra Says:

      But if kinky hair helps in cooling the body, then why don’t the wogs in hot, steamy India have it or the aboriginal savages in Polynesia, which is hotter and steamier still? Their hair is as straight as a horse’s tail. Maybe it’s just that every species or sub-species has its own way of evolving according to its genetic ancestry and local environment.

    12. ANDREI YUSTSCHINSKY Says:

      Non-Whites rape more because maybe they are tired of being on the DL or DOWN LOW like B. Hussein Obama might be..
      Listen to an 11 minute Larry Sinclair audio exerp explaining this…. http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_L_Sinclair_111808.mp3

    13. Arminius Says:

      Kinky vs. straight hair, negro vs. Indian etc. dark skin unexplainable?
      Not so, if we consider dark skin a secondary phenomen. I understand negro babies are born light skinned, it darkens some days after birth. Must be a pointer to mutation.
      Natural selection provided even undoubtly Aryan stock (as Iranians and Indians are) with more and more melanin as protection against the ultaviolet rays of the sun. Remember, Clothes are inventions of the past 5000 years or so, before that Adam and Eve had to see how they got along without any cover.

    14. Vaultner Says:

      It’s been said that most U.S. niggers have some White blood in their veins. It’s also obvious to me that most of them are lighter colored than pictures I’ve seen of the African original.

      I argue that the Indian has bred somewhat with the British for two hundred years, & that the Muslims could have originally been White before the jew perpetrated their evil on them thousands of years ago.

      This could explain the deep rooted hatred of the jew in Islamic culture. I would also suspect that if current U.S. policies & culture continue, two thousand years from now our descendants will all have coco brown skin & be throwing rocks at some sort of future tank, while the jew claims Lakewood N.J. as their ancestral homeland.

    15. Zarathustra Says:

      Wait a second. Adam and Eve? 5000 years ago? Not this argument again!

    16. gw Says:

      “5000 years ago? Not this argument again!”

      I don’t think that’s what he meant. I hope not! He shouldn’t have gotten Adam and Eve mixed into it, though.

      Textiles, weaving, domestication of animals and plants, settled villages and agriculture — I thought that’s what he was referring to. They wouldn’t have invented weaving, knitting, sewing until they had domesticated plants and animals to providce fibers. Of course, they had animal hides before that and maybe grass and leaves, but wherever the climate allowed it, nudity would have been much the simpler thing.

    17. Arminius Says:

      gw is correct.
      Zarathustra suggested somewhere we should take matters occasionally a bit from the lighter side, and if a little irony causes a smile, the better we cope with serious matters.
      I referred mockingly to Adam and Eve, because the Jewish (and Christian) Holy Bible asserts, God was not only their creator, but also- their first taylor. HE made them clothes, because… they were ashamed to be naked. Typical Jewish mentality- but all people of the world are supposed to follow it.
      BTW, is this the reason, why nowadays children, even babies and also (stupid) adults wear long clothes while frolicking in the water? In the last 15 years this is a remarkable trend getting acceptance and- publicity. Considering how immensely Jewish media influence has gained just in this time, I see it as another, but so far not thought of example of gentile mind manipulation.

    18. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      “God was not only their creator, but also- their first taylor”

      Good slip, I assume you mean tailor. . .