Permanent Link
The comment from justice Anthony Kennedy is great news. His opinion on this matter was iffy but it seems much clearer now. So it’s looking more and more like the court will rule in favor of the pro-gun side of the argument:
Send letters, packages, review copies and donations to:
(c) 2010
Send letters, packages, review copies and donations to:
A. Linder, POB 101, Kirksville MO 63501
The views of the writers and readers of VanguardNewsNetwork.com are the sole responsibility of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the owner, editor, webmaster, transmitter, or any of the other writers or respondents whose work appears at Vanguard News Network. VNN does not advocate any unlawful or criminal acts, nor should any statement made by anyone at VNN be taken as incitement, threat, or conspiracy to commit any unlawful or criminal acts. The views expressed at VNN do constitute free speech as protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.
21 March, 2008 at 6:26 pm
Not exactly true. Briefs have been filed by the Bush Administration and statements by the Justices themselves that say that while it may still be an individual’s right to possess a firearm, such ownership is still subject to “reasonable” restriction.
21 March, 2008 at 8:37 pm
Well I guess it’s only because gentiles still outnumber jews on the Supreme Court.
For now anyway.
Thanks, ZOG, for letting us little people have some form of effective self-defense. Really.
21 March, 2008 at 10:04 pm
Hey kikes: hands off my Glock! Thats fine Austrian craftsmanship.
22 March, 2008 at 1:08 pm
It seems pretty cut & dry to me. If the 2nd was intended for a militia there would have been no private ownership then.