29 January, 2009

Fresh (Conventional If You Read the Literature) Comments on Holocaust Reignites Controversy

Posted by Socrates in Bradley R. Smith, Holocaust, holocaust racket, Socrates at 11:55 pm | Permanent Link

by Bradley R. Smith: [Here].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 02/07/09 We Will Not Protect Bad Ideas from Public Scrutiny 100% similar
  3. 02/08/12 Getting the Message Out 100% similar
  4. 05/11/09 Holocaust Dogmatists/Holocaust-Fraud Deniers Committed to… 100% similar
  5. 03/06/09 A Question for the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum 100% similar
  6. 02/14/09 Youngstown State University, the ADL, and Judaic and Holocaust Studies 100% similar
  7. 16 Responses to “Fresh (Conventional If You Read the Literature) Comments on Holocaust Reignites Controversy”

    1. Zarathustra Says:

      Those Jews seem to be constantly “troubled” and “disturbed” by everything the Goyim say. I wonder if they are troubled and disturbed by all those Palestinian babies with their little heads blown off because of Zionist air strikes? Assholes.

      I am now convinced that when the Day of Retribution comes, not even Satan himself will be able to save his big-beaked offspring from the rough justice they are going to get and so richly deserve.

    2. German Nazi Says:

      The holocaust never existed. /
      Den Holocaust hat es nie gegeben.

      But there will be a holocaust. /
      Aber es wird einen Holocaust geben.

      Did you know that your site is banned from Google Germanys index? And the ugly “money jews” out there exactly know why they have given order to apply this form of censorship: because your blog tells the truth.

      Hopefully, one day the US public will recognize that their true enemy is not from Iraq, is not from a (former) communist country and is not from a former axis power. Indeed, their very enemy is the eternal jew.

    3. Old_Dutch Says:

      “If Israel nuked Chicago, Congress would approve.”

    4. Walso Starr Says:

      I think we can all understand in the 1500’s that science had not progress to the point of debunking much of witchcraft and religion of the day. So it is understandable why Galileo Galilei was placed under house arrest for stating that, with the aid of his telescope, he had discerned that the earth rotated around the sun, not the other way around, and that the earth was not the center of the universe. This revelation would shake the very foundation of religion because it countered the literal meaning ofscripture.Galileo was lucky he didn’t lose his head, but was however placed under house arrest. We can look back on that time and think it pretty silly that this genius of a man was classified as a heretic. Moving ahead 500 years we find the same mind set working for the jews. There probably is no other subject so forbidden as the “shoah business” except maybe a study in negro intelligence, which by the way is an oxymoron. A mind is a terrible thing to waste on a negro. Anyway, the jews have a vested interest in keeping the story from seeing the light of day. Their whole religion centers on their persecution and they circle the wagons whenever someone should ever question the number 6 million. The only reason they are able to suppress the real history is because they control all the information outlets and can pretty much control what gets discussed. Have you noticed that on any AM talk radio the host might criticize the president, a congressman, a senator or anyone else, but when did you ever hear one of these judas goats ever criticize israhell. Even after the turkey shoot in Gaza where women and children were slaughtered along with zoo animals did you hear one peep from those vermin. It’s obvious that their lively hood depends on keeping their lips planted squarely on the jews posteriors. If only there was a hell for these folks.

    5. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      “If Israel puked Washington, Congress would approve.”

    6. Zarathustra Says:

      Being a right-wing radio talk show host is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

    7. gw Says:

      Oh! That is EXCELLENT! Very well said! So true.

      (applies to both posts above)

    8. Tina Carter Says:

      @Zarathustra

      Assuming you’re not a Jews, then you ought to learn bit more about Jews. I would recommand 1984 by George Orwell would do you well. Fools among us deserve to treated as they are by our worthy antagonist. I dare say, Yahweh’s pets have been too kind since some European do not belong to a viable species of mammalian life.

    9. Zarathustra Says:

      Tina Carter……

      Bitch, you so crazy!!!

    10. Jordan Says:

      @Tina

      Zarathustra is not white.

    11. Krycek Says:

      I have to agree with others Zarathustra is either a Jew through some Jewish contamination of his family line, such as is so common in the remnants of the White European today, or a light-headed and exhibitionistic homosexual, like so many perverts today who take up bizarre and exotic drugs to nurture their sick demented and unworthy life .

    12. German Nazi Says:

      Hey, I’m bisexual and don’t use any exotic drugs.

      […]

      Am I unworthy to live because I love people of my own gender?

    13. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      Who goes apeshit when the subject of 911 being an inside job is raised?

    14. Dewi Says:

      Slightly off topic. A muslim who speaks arabic told me the other day that Hollywood derives from the hebrew words al hood, which translates into english as The Jew! He has since confimed to me that this is correct.

      Can anyone confirm this?

    15. Zarathustra Says:

      “Zarathustra is not white.”

      “I have to agree with others Zarathustra is either a Jew through some Jewish contamination of his family line, such as is so common in the remnants of the White European today, or a light-headed and exhibitionistic homosexual, like so many perverts today who take up bizarre and exotic drugs to nurture their sick demented and unworthy life .”

      I am truly flattered that I have attracted the kinds of critics that I have. Others have to settle for detractors who write such banalities as “shut up, you idiot”, or “you’re such an asshole, you make me wanna puke”. Not so with my critics! They are clearly a cut above the rest. It is an unalloyed pleasure confounding and exasperating such people as these.

    16. gw Says:

      Dewi Says: “Slightly off topic. A muslim who speaks arabic told me that Hollywood derives from the hebrew words al hood, which translates into english as The Jew!
      Can anyone confirm this?”

      Afraid I can’t. That is an intriguing coincidence. But I am sure it’s purely accidental.

      The name, Hollywood, like Beverly Hills, Wiltshire Blvd., etc. comes to us from the British Isles, at a time when Anglophilia was the rage and new real estate developments were thought to gain a certain classy cachet from such British-sounding names.

      In fact, Hollywood is the name of a small town in Ireland, near Dublin. Its name would go back many centuries, meaning simply the “holly wood” , a forest where holly grew. (holly being a thorny type of tree or bush). The forest had once been a haven of bandits and cattle theives, doubtless because of the protection of the spiny holly.

      Sorry, nothing Arabic there. The human mouth is only capable of making so many sounds, so it’s inevitable there’s going to be some duplication.

      But there is a rich irony in how it all turned out, isn’t there? An amazing coincidence.