12 February, 2009

Once Again: They’re Not White

Posted by Socrates in genetics, jewed culture, Jewish genetics, race, race science, racial differences, racial science, Socrates, Stormfront, white nationalism, White philosophy at 4:47 pm | Permanent Link

During the past few days, there was a thread at the Stormfront forum, which has apparently been deleted, about a popular Israeli model. Quite a few forum posters commented that the model was beautiful and was either “White” or “White enough” or similar words. This is a good time to point out to newbies that skin color alone does not determine race. Jews have light-colored skin, and some even have blue eyes, but they aren’t genetically White. “White” means “European gentile.” When you look at a Jew, you might as well be looking at a Mexican, a negro or a Chinaman. Of course, the Jews are responsible for the fact that so many people believe they’re White. They’ve been trying for decades to reinvent themselves, and they have largely succeeded.


  • Similar posts:

    1. 12/22/13 Christianity: Not Good for Whites 27% similar
    2. 01/10/09 How to Have More White Babies: Part I of III 26% similar
    3. 03/03/13 When Will White People Learn (About Allowing Jews Into White Governments)? 25% similar
    4. 01/21/14 It’s Not Your Daddy’s America: the Continuing War on White Males 24% similar
    5. 10/31/13 Nothing Will Change in America Until… 24% similar
    6. 65 Responses to “Once Again: They’re Not White”

      1. Curious Says:

        It has been said again and again, you do not have a magic wand between your legs…

      2. Captainchaos Says:

        I guess the more profound questions is, why, to the untrained eye, do Jews look White?

        Whether one accepts the out of Israel or out of Khazaria (or some combination thereof) theory of origin, the question arises, how did they come to look White?

        Maybe they always did look White? Perhaps the selective pressure of non-White-looking Jews being killed in pogroms over the centuries acted as a bottle-neck on their formerly swarthy appearance? What about racial-mixing with Europeans, how much has there been?

        I don’t know.

      3. Osama bin Laden Says:

        I know this will not be a popular opinion, but while Jews are genetically distinct, they are not genetically distant from Europeans (as compared to say a chinaman or a negro). Also, some Jews are more Europeanized than others; due to mixing.

        Clearly this one has a large dose of European genes; hard to make out any Eastern influence at all.

        It is a moot point though; it is Jews who believe it is very important to preserve their race and try to avoid mixing. The Jews, as a race, aren’t going anywhere, regardless of forum debates about some Jews being “white enough”.

      4. Captainchaos Says:

        The point is the Jews are seemingly genetically hard-wired to destroy our race.

        We don’t like that much.

      5. Angryyoungman Says:

        @ Osama: I concur.

        I tend to agree with Metzger’s view of Jews. They are an ancient cult that wants to destroy everything that it cannot control or influence. They are not a race, they are and always have been a religious cult of half breeds and foreign converts. (All racial Semites, Jewish or Arab, are most likely descendants of ancient mulattoes/quadroons with a pinch of asiatic thrown in).

        For example, I will not deny this Bar Refaeli or the young Alicia Silverstone are/were beautiful women. It’s because the majority of their genes are white or Europid. Many or most of their ancestors were jumping in the sack with the hated goyim. Blue eyes didn’t come from the desert, lol. Morally and Psychologically they may be Semitic, but genetically they are no worse than a white American with a small amount of Amerindian ancestry. They are genetically the same as you or I, while others in their cult still retain the old Semitic genes such as that stupid Amy Winehouse or that cunt Susan Sontag.

        A race than will claim claim blue eyed and blonde haired movie stars along with Ethiopians is no race at all. It is a religion, or as I like to call it a cult.

      6. Angryyoungman Says:

        Excuse me- Last Paragraph, “a race that will…”

      7. Alsoangry Says:

        Angryyoungman Says:
        12 February, 2009 at 11:10 pm
        Excuse me- Last Paragraph, “a race that will…”

        …is no race at all.

      8. Socrates Says:

        Dr. Pierce called Jews a “hybrid race.” They are genetically related, which means that they aren’t a cult per se.

      9. Z.O.G. Says:

        Jews are definitely a genetically distinct racial/ethnic group, but they are also race mixers. These two things at first seem contradictory to each other, but they’re really not. That’s why so many people have trouble understanding the racial/ethnic angle to the Jewish Question.

        Like Pierce said, they are a hybrid race.

      10. Z.O.G. Says:

        Jews are notorious race mixers. That’s why there are FIVE black/Jewish hybrids in the Obama Administration right now.

        Mona Sutphen
        Valerie Jarrett
        Cecilia Rouse
        Susan Rice
        Eric Holder

      11. Diamed Says:

        Jews fall halfway between European and Palestinian genes. They’re not European, or arabs, but they could easily become one or the other with a generation or two of interbreeding. Given their intelligence it’s obvious we want jews on our side, not against us, interbreed and they’ll be white soon enough, and the whole issue will become moot.

        Jews are not as genetically distant from Europeans as chinese or blacks, or even Arabs, so it’s stupid to call it them a race the ‘same as chinese or blacks.’

      12. Dutch Windmill Fortune Cookie Says:

        Forget Jewish Supremacism or White Supremacism or Accidental Supremacism for a moment and consider the primacy of being … since being is the ultimate subject or determinable element to which every concept not irreducibly simple can be reduced, “being” has a primacy in regard to all such concepts or primary intelligible or initial and sequential attributes. Even if genes, race, or whiteness were primary, who could prove they are not accidental?
        You need Substantial Supremacism to distinguish things here.
        Now imagine some particular substance, say, me. Suppose I go from being pale to being tan. Now it is still I who exist both before and after the sun has had its characteristic effect on me. This illustrates an important feature of substances: they can successively have contrary accidents and yet retain their numerical identity. This sort of change is known, appropriately enough, as accidental change. In an accidental change, a substance persists through the change, having first one accident and then another. But clearly not all changes are accidental changes. There was once a time when I did not exist, and then I came into existence. We can’t analyze this change as an accidental change, since there doesn’t seem to be any substance that persists through the change. Instead, a substance is precisely what comes into being; this is not an accidental but a substantial change. And yet there must be something that persists even through substantial change, since otherwise we wouldn’t have change at all; substances would come to exist from nothing and disappear into nothing.
        Substantial Supremacism is the high ground here and he who would be king should get there firstest with the mostest and keep up the scare.

      13. Arch Stanton Says:

        “It has been said again and again, you do not have a magic wand between your legs…” A curious comment. I’m not exactly certain what it alludes to, but it sure sounds intriguing. Is this an allusion to the male organ or the female genitalia? As for the female side of the “wand” equation I can only say, yeah, well maybe, but I’ve noticed it sure has worked it’s magic on me and it seems like a lot of other guys have the same response. I can remember seeing “Soldier Blue” in the Early 1970′s. In that movie Candace Bergen was the hottest thing I could imagine, but look at her today. She’s well on her way to becoming a pinched-mouth Goldia Mier. Someone here once noted that jews do not age well and from what I have seen, this seems to be the case. Physical beauty is only skin deep and as it passes, the internal makeup begins to show through ever more clearly. It is what jews are on the inside that shows in their later years. The Sufis say a man’s soul is written in his face and this seems to hold even more true with women. I have seen many white women in their later years who are so beautiful I can only imagine (or is that fantasize?) what they must have looked like in their mid twenties. Yet I cannot remember one Jewess that followed this example of aged beauty. I also cannot remember an older Jewess that was happy or contented with her situation, no matter how much wealth she had. In fact more than once I have encountered Jewesses that made me wonder what it must feel like to wake up next to Henry Kissinger. No doubt examples of Jewesses that have aged well exist, but I find it notable that I cannot remember a single one. Way back when we all wore flowers in our hair on our way to San Fransisco, we used to have a category of women we called “earth mothers.” These were rather Rubenesque examples of femininity that wore voluminous skirt and seemed to be a magnet for children. While never overwhelming brilliant, these women made up for it with the genuine love they radiated. Somehow I never really felt like discussing weightier matters like politics or religions with earth mothers, they were always so happy that I felt guilty about disturbing their existence with the cares of this world. Again I find it notable that I have never met a jewess who came anywhere close to the earth mother persona. People who are ugly on the inside will, sooner or later, become ugly people on the outside. And frankly with all those evil terrorist out their waiting to spring from their hidy holes to mastermind unbelievably coordinated hijacking attacks on Jew York city, I really don’t think I want to see any jew painted on the side of an airliner I am about to board.

      14. gw Says:

        “It has been said again and again, you do not have a magic wand between your legs…” A curious comment. I’m not exactly certain what it alludes to, but it sure sounds intriguing. “

        I was perplexed by that too, but was too embarassed to ask. Didn’t want to reveal my abysmal ignorance! But since you’ve gone first …. I’m not alone.

        Oh, well, we get a lot of mental cases here. One can’t take all of them seriously.

      15. gw Says:

        “The Sufis say a man’s soul is written in his face and this seems to hold even more true with women. “

        Interesting thought. It may come through more as you age. But I’m not so sure it always applies in the case of women. The reason is that women have so many ways available to conceal themselves, whereas with men, what you see is what is there.

        Perhaps this is why Jews have specialized so heavily in developing the cosmetics industry? Plastic surgery too. All those Helena Rubensteins, Max Factors, and Estee Lauders cannot be a mere accident.

      16. gw Says:

        “In that movie [Soldier Blue] Candace Bergen was the hottest thing I could imagine, but look at her today. She’s well on her way to becoming a pinched-mouth Goldia Mier. Someone here once noted that jews do not age well and from what I have seen, this seems to be the case.”

        I don’t know if you mean to imply that Candace Bergen is Jewish. I had never thought her to be. I did some checking, and I find no hint of it. Her grandparents were Swedish immigrants, and her mother was a famous mode (where she gets her looks). Her pictures, both earlier and specially now, look like a very typical Scandinavian woman. No Golda Meier!!!

        I will grant that her whole life story as an actress seems to be surrounded by Jews, but that is to be expected, in order to have a career in Hollywood. It’s the price of being a movie star.

      17. Angryyoungman Says:

        @ Diamed: It depends…

        If a Jew of pure or nearly pure European extraction wanted to join our people they would first have to PROVE that they denounce, refute and despise every belief and tradition from their parent(s) and ancestors and fully embrace the traditions of our own various peoples. This would involve taking a racially aware and Aryan mate within our own communities. To the naysayers, I am sure that it has happened before in history. Our people are not the only ones susceptible to cultural/racial treason.

        @ Arch Stanton

        I agree. But the same thing could be said of many Aryan women these days. There are many existing pearls of Aryan beauty that I have seen since my days in a Catholic high-school, though many of the most popular girls from memory are showing the wrinkles or roughness in the face from the clubbing/material girl life. Their inner and outer beauty is being destroyed year by year by this disgusting society and media.

        It makes a matured (in personality) man regret never getting closer with the “plain Jane’s” who one was buddies with in junior or high school. They probably never wore make-up or revealing clothes because their parents could have been in-laws you could see eye to eye with. Opposed to the sorry excuses for parents most white children have these days when “it’s off to somebody else to raise you while Mommy’s paycheck goes to the boat/trip to Acapulco.”

      18. Zarathustra Says:

        Jews, I believe, are comprised of undesirable or unsavory elements cast off by other races. The Jewish “race” is like the strainer at the bottom of your kitchen sink. Or, if you prefer, a grease trap.

      19. gw Says:

        I checked out the photos of that Israeli model (who’s been painted on the side of the plane, for some incomprehensible reason). I don’t understand it. With a 300 million population in this country, couldn’t they find an attractive American model right here? Did they have to go all the way to Israel? Something’s fishy. And IF they had to look abroad, why not go to China, with its billion possibilities, rather than a tiny country like Israel? Are good looking people only to be found in Israel? That’s the implication.

        Anyway, it’s hard to comment on the “beauty” of a professional model like her. Under the dyed hair (or wig?), behind the heavy eye make-up, and without the expensive dental work, it’s hard to know what she would have looked like au naturel. I imagine she would be quite ordinary. Still not bad looking, perhaps, but no raving beauty.

      20. Zarathustra Says:

        But there are some Jewesses in Israel that have blonde hair and blue eyes, or red hair and green eyes and …..well, let’s face it, they’re hot looking! No such Jewesses are to be found around here, though. We only get the Bella Abzugs and Amy Winehouses.

        Jews are basically Afro-Asiatic mongrel/hybrids, some of whom (like the aforementioned Israeli Jewesses) have varying degrees of Caucasoid in them. Is that a satisfactory explanation?

      21. Angryyoungman Says:

        @Zarathustra

        It might sound stupid, but that might be because the Jews with some semblance of physical fortitude or courage are the only ones who live in Israel.

        If one could have saved the Aryan soldiers who died in WWI and WWII, I think the beauty of their daughters would be unsurpassed.

      22. The Red Skull Says:

        It must be Remembered that the jews are the Chameleons of the human race.Thru centuries of survival and adaptation,they have learned to “blend in” with the Host Societies they feed off of.That she is beautiful,there is no doubt.That she has a very high amount of “Euro-Genes” in her is also evident.Ones like her could be assimilated into our gene pool effectively,as they are mostly European anyway.However,the success of that would depend on how strongly any “Euro-Jew” identifies with their Cult-like religion.The Jews have managed for the most part to retain their primitive racial-survival instinct and collectivism better than Whites.However,we Whites have been brainwashed for years that this “thinking” is evil and wrong,when nature is telling us-”Keep to your own”.For any who look White,the Question asked should be-”Are you White or Jewish?”If they say jewish-wipe and flush immediately,if they say White,then they should be publicly forced to renounce any and all past allegiences to their “religion”.Then put in a position of non-vital impotance and asked to perform as much Physical Labor as possible,as Jews seem to have an aversion to real “work”.
        The Fuhrer realized this problem with the “Mischling’s” or Half-jews and their were many of them that fought in the Wehrmacht loyally.People would ask the Jews in Germany,-”are you jewish or German?”People
        couldn’t accept that they could be both.
        The Jews desire to “blend in” is not born from a civic-mindedness or attempt at Genuine Assimilation as the Liberals would have us believe,but from a desire to “CONTROL”.That one word will be their undoing,as more and more braindead and blind Goyim realize their game,through their heavy-handed excesses.We can use the Euro-jews to our benefit,but we must always keep in mind that it is like clutching a Viper to our Brest,and guard accordingly.

      23. gw Says:

        Angryyoungman Says: “I tend to agree with Metzger’s view of Jews. They are an ancient cult that wants to destroy everything that it cannot control or influence. They are not a race, they are and always have been a religious cult of half breeds and foreign converts. … descendants of ancient mulattoes/quadroons with a pinch of Asiatic thrown in.”

        Exactly! I heartily agree with Angry. Precisely speaking, they are NOT a “race”.

        When you combine two races, you do not get a new race. you just get a mixture of old races, a hybrid— just as when you combine two or more elements, you don’t get a new element, you get a compound. So, with humans you get a hybrid. Not a race.

        I’ve had Spaniards boast to me: “In the Americas, we created whole new races”. No they didn’t! They just created hybrids from old races. Why can’t people see this? It’s so obvious! No new “races” have been created.

        “Like Pierce said [of the Jews], they are a hybrid race.” I can agree with that basic statement. But still better said, they are a hybrid PEOPLE, or nation or tribe, a combination of races, but not a race. Call them even a cult which is further bound together by a common gene pool.

        In their long centuries of wanderings and living among many other nations, they picked up a slew of miscellaneous genes from everywhere along the way. It was inevitable. Some of them have more Aryan genes; some have more Semitic genes, even Ethiopian genes, or whatever. I’m sure the Jews know — and know it better than anyone — that they are a hybrid people, or tribe, but not a “race”. Surely it’s one reason for their hatred of the notion of a pure race. They themselves are not one. And they know it.

        Aside from being carelessly tossed salad of racial genes, much about being a Jew consists in BELIEVING that they are a Jew. It starts with their indoctrination at an early age. I think Hitler said it the best of all. He considered the Jews to be “a race of the mind”. That sums it up and I’ve never seen a better explanation.

      24. Zarathustra Says:

        Not stupid at all, Angryoungman, not stupid at all. I hadn’t thought of that. Personality characteristics do have a tendency to manifest themselves on one’s face, don’t they?

        And like Red Skull and other observant types have noted, there is a psychological component to being Jewish as well, not just a genetic one. Jews think differently from normal people. Their perception of the truth is certainly different from ours. But what is particularly worrisome is when White people start acting and thinking like Jews, ie, “Jewthink”. Greed, materialism, hyperambition, cosmopolitanism and ruthlessness are all symptoms of this terrible malady that afflicts millions of White yuppies.

      25. LoveWhite Says:

        Good points by Zarathustra and Red Skull. I would also add that as the Jews are an ancient admixture of different races then that would account for their varied phenotypical appearances, ranging from very Asiatic looking (Sephardic) to almost Aryan. And then as some posters have pointed out, the Jews picked up some north European genes over the ages while still possessing majority Semitic genetics, alowing them to retain their identity. While some nationalists have stated the Jews are an ethnocentric insular group that tend to only marry their own kind, that is only mainly true of the orthodox community. The secular assimilated Jews are heavily into blending, and I have noticed a rising phenomenon of Jewesses with white Anglo-Saxon men, whom they very often prefer to their own men.

      26. The Red Skull Says:

        Ahhh-I love reading this site,as even I,the Great Red Skull,am enlightened more about “the Chosen”.FACT-The jews are a Hybrid Race,who picked up more genes in their travels than a whore on 42nd street in Jew York.Fact-Since “jews” can’t be defined as a “race”-maybe as a sub-race,we are left to conclude that the biggest part of being “jewish” is a state of mind.If this were not so,then why all the “conversions”,especially by Hollywood actors?Herr Z,Once again-making the point that “JEWTHINK”-great term!,is infecting and corrupting our people who aren’t mixing outright.By Herr Z’s definition of “JEWTHINK”=Greed,materialism,hyper(control)ambition,cosmopolitanism,ruthlessness,and i would add Supreme Selfishness,is an exact description of the typical braindead Kwan.By that definition,most of White America has been turned into “cultural Jews”,with their standards of happiness measured by how much they “own” or “control”.Replace a nations Spiritual Values of folk,family,and obedience to God and Community of Race, with the overbearing,all-consuming, crass materialism of the Jew,and you have Modern America!Waaallaa!Ps-mixed with a generous helping of Mud People.Or as some wise man once said,”mixing sh*t with Ice Cream doesn’t do the sh*t any good and just ruins the Ice Cream.”

      27. Arminius Says:

        Quote from:
        “The life of an American Jew in Racist Israel” by
        Jack Berstein:
        “The marriage ceremony was held in the Sephardic Synagogue…Ziva and I were very happy, but our marriage created serious problems. You see, Ziva is a Sephardic Jewess and I am an Ashkenazi Jew. For an Ashkenazi Jew to marry a Sephardic Jew is frowned upon in Israel by the ruling Ashkenazis. To understand this, you must realize the difference between the Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jews.
        “The powerful Zionist propaganda machine has led the American people to believe that a Jew is a Jew- ONE race of people and that they are “God’s Chosen People”…
        First, it is important for you to understand that Jews are NOT ONE RACE OF PEOPLE.
        “There are two distinct groups of Jews in the world and they come from two different areas of the world- the SEPHARDIC Jews from the Middle East and North Africa and the ASHKENAZI Jews come from Eastern Europe.”

      28. Mark Says:

        Out of the major races, Jews are part of the Caucasoid race. Are they European? No. Do they look “white?” If you mean do they look like some Europeans, yes, although they usually have distinctive features as well that most people are not aware of.

        For instance, the actor Tony Shalhoub who plays Adrian Monk on the popular TV show Monk, may be perceived as white by most people, but he is in fact not white, as in European, he is Lebanese. Could he pass as Italian? Probably.

        Jews are genetically distinct, as the ancestry can be detected by analysis.

      29. Curious Says:

        I meant sexual attraction is no proof of racial purity.

        Not all genes are equal. It is obvious that Good Looks genes have more survival value than others. The fact that Bar Refali has Aryan Good Looks genes doesn’t mean her other genes are Aryan.

        The fact that jewish women do not age well could be a cause of jewish paedophilia.

      30. LoveWhite Says:

        I read a Daily Mail article about a 13 year old British boy who has impregnated a teenage girl. Scrolling down the page to the
        photo of parents of a daughter from a similar case (Webster) in 1998, and you can clearly see the wife is Jewish and the husband is a gentile.

        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1144244/Baby-faced-boy-13-father-insists-Ill-good-dad.html

      31. the Watcher Says:

        I also dated a Jewish girl, in my youth.

        Beautiful young woman, blue eyes, dark hair.

        But she was White.

        It is the earth and the climate that produce the different races. If you see a black, you know he is originally from sub-saharan Africa. If you see a certain type of Oriental, you know he is from some part of Asia, and a specialist could probably tell you exactly which part.

        So it is with Whites. If you see a White, you know that it is the European climate which produced their physiical appearance.

        So if a person LOOKS White, they are White, regardless of their religion.

        I only dated this girl a few times. I took her to the Byrds concert.

        She found me boring. I later found out that the minister’s son was bonking her. Before I found this out, I told her that the minister’s son was a narcissistic egomaniac, a fact that was later borne out.

        I still see her occasionally. She married a gentile. She has put on a few pounds in middle-age.

        I fancy that I can tell she regrets her youthful indiscretions. After all, devout Jews are against pre-marital sex, as are Christians.
        Youthful indiscretions always come back to haunt you.

        I also fancy that I was the “nice Jewish boy” her parents probably wished for her, only I am not Jewish.

        Even though she made good grades and was an honors student, I did not think she was all that bright. Good memory, of what she had read in her textbooks, maybe.

      32. Justin Huber Says:

        “Skin color alone does not determine race”. May be some truth to this. For instance, Hitler himself seemed to make distinctions between the various “white” groups. From what I’ve read (in Hitler’s Table Talk etc.) he seems to have had a very low opinion of Eastern Europeans, particulary Russians. Many of these people certainly “look white”.

      33. LoveWhite Says:

        Justin: Slavs are definitely a sub group the white race, and many of them are very white indeed. Quite a few WNs think Hitler was too harsh in his evaluation of the them. The Russians as part of the Slav group are no lowly branch if you consider their accomplishments in science, technology and the arts.

      34. Z.O.G. Says:

        …Then put in a position of non-vital importance and asked to perform as much Physical Labor as possible,as Jews seem to have an aversion to real “work”.

        Arbeit Macht Frei.

      35. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

        “Way back when we all wore flowers in our hair on our way to San Fransisco”

        That reminds me. It was the summer of ’67, Mike and I drove my MGB from SoCal to San Francisco, listening to Scott McKenzie. “Summertime will be a love-in there.” Not exactly.

        Through friends, we met young guys Art and Barry. Art was a young engineer- Barry was some sort of liberal. After drinking all afternoon, Barry decided to take us on a tour in his Mustang. Sorta like Bullitt, but slower. Then Barry took us to a bar. We entered- all niggers. Oh shit. We went to a room, and met a female negress. Talked for a while, then she pulled a ball point pen out and stabbed Mike in the arm. It was time to split.
        On the way out the door, this big nigger yelled GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE! We did.

        Years later I still wonder why Barry took us there. He lived in SF and had to have known about the danger. We could have been killed. He was half liberal, half something else.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SB2tYYYlwMc

      36. Captainchaos Says:

        Diamed: “Jews fall halfway between European and Palestinian genes. They’re not European, or arabs, but they could easily become one or the other with a generation or two of interbreeding.”

        No. What once was would have been destroyed. The Jewish genotype would be no more, and the larger genotype that assimilated the Jewish genotype would have been altered in the process of assimilation.

        “Given their intelligence it’s obvious we want jews on our side, not against us, interbreed and they’ll be white soon enough, and the whole issue will become moot.”

        Given Asian intelligence it is obvious we want them on our side, let the interbreeding begin. LOL!

        Where do you get this shit, Diamud? Get this, twit: The entire history of Jews is one of a heroic resistance to genetic assimilation. It is also a saga of a relentless will to subvert and dominate its host society. We are not discussing Chinese in diaspora here. Your prescription is tantamount to the suggestion that we lay down our arms before a charging enemy and hope he will be merciful.

        “Jews are not as genetically distant from Europeans as chinese or blacks, or even Arabs, so it’s stupid to call it them a race the ’same as chinese or blacks.’”

        Really just a bit of semantic slight of hand to soften us up to cooperation with Jews laboring under the false impression that their genetic absorption into our racial body is well nigh.

        But what the fuck, I’ll play along: In times not so long past the English or Germans were referred to as “the English race” or “the German race,” used today, describing said as a “race” would be archaic. Capische? That is obviously the sense in which a thinking person would use the descriptor “race” in reference to Jews. Frank Salter would call them an ethny – how is that?

        P.S. It was not long ago that on another site you were vehemently exhorting the extermination of ALL non-Whites GLOBALLY! But, now, you recommend psychological disarmament to the threat of Jews to the point that we inter-marry and cooperate with them. Just what is your game? I smell a rat, big time!

      37. Dutch Windmill Fortune Cookie Says:

        25 Cent Fortune Cookie Star Scroll from Howdy Doody Machine at the Fair say, “Triangulating data systems and Amy Winehouse’s efforts at Substantial Supremacism and stardom can be hard to watch. Celebrity pathologies etc. and Barack Obama is not a valid president may have some sort of bag blend with ZOG.
        He was born in Kenya.
        Keep your own favorite ordinance of secession and Jefferson and Madison and some 21st century resolve in your coat pocket
        See thumbnail photos of Jeff Conaway and the “U.S.A.” Celebrity detox and the garbage that becomes of fallen stars and see the freaky pains trembling. Jeff Conaway and Amy Winehouse look a little alike.”

      38. Socrates Says:

        the Watcher Says: “So if a person LOOKS White, they are White, regardless of their religion.”

        That’s exactly THE OPPOSITE of what I was trying to point out. So, you’re saying that if a Jew “looks White,” then he is White?? Amazing.

      39. Dutch Windmill Fortune Cookie Says:

        Jeff Conaway and Amy Winehouse karaoke! Sieg heil celebrity detox! Drang nach osten! Gott mit uns!

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2BjJbKQkgc

        http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=&search_query=Love+Hurts&aq=f

      40. 2050 Says:

        Mark said:
        “For instance, the actor Tony Shalhoub who plays Adrian Monk on the popular TV show Monk, may be perceived as white by most people, but he is in fact not white, as in European, he is Lebanese. Could he pass as Italian? Probably.

        Jews are genetically distinct, as the ancestry can be detected by analysis.”

        I figured Monk was a jew.
        “Could he pass as Italian? Probably.”
        All the Italians I know personally, and while they are not enough to be a representative sample, are as white as white can be. Many are blonde,
        For years Hollywood has been casting jew actors as Italians. for example, jew Peter Falk as Columbo. Same for mafia type roles. Most Americans think the look of a jew is Italian.
        Monk could pass for a movie/TV Italian, because, being a semitic arab type, he could pass for a jew.

      41. old_dutch Says:

        This discussion reminds me of those mega threads on VNN Forum entitled, “Is this chick White?”

        The jews are an ancient Mediterranean temple cult. The jews do have a marriage taboo, in which automatic membership in the cult is passed through the female members of the cult to their children. The jews also have dietary taboos. Everyone knows the old saying, you are what you eat. LOL.

        Kevin MacDonald seems to think that generations of conditioning, and genetics has produced today’s jew. It might be interesting to find out if diet has a long term conditioning effect on the makeup of the jews?

        Btw, you have to hand it to the jews, they are the only surviving ancient pagan temple cult. LOL.

      42. Pennington Says:

        Fuck inter-ethnic mixing. Period. Jews intermarrying with their host tribe is akin to the puppet master stabbing his controlling tentacle directly into the flesh of the back. With intermarriage comes destruction of the bloodline, and loyalty to the puppeteer.

      43. Zarathustra Says:

        The actors Tony Shaloub, Jamie Farr, Regis Philbin, Danny Thomas, daughter Marlo and F. Murray Abraham are all obviously Semites, just not of the Jewish variety. Even though Arabs, Lebs and Armenians are all quite ethnically and genetically similar to Jews, they don’t possess the “evil” gene that many Jews seem to have in abundance.

      44. Jews = Ugly Faces, Ugly Souls Says:

        This Israeli model Bar Refaeli is pretty, but she is by no means beautiful; see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bar_Refaeli_age_18.jpg

        The recent pics in SI and elsewhere are all airbrushed with massive use of trick lighting and makeup – thus they are a pathetic trick of mass-media Jewry who are trying to convince people that “Jews can be beautiful like Whites.” This is obviously a major lie. Plus, she might have just as much Russian ancestry as Jewish, since so many Israelis came to Israel extensively mixed from former Soviet countries. Thus it is her non-Jewish ancestry which makes her halfway attractive, not her Jewish ancestry. I also wouldn’t be surprised if she ended up converting to Christianity or Islam sooner or later – many decent, attractive Jews end up doing that – leaving the rest of the repulsive bunch of Jews behind.

        Jews are incapable of being beautiful because their inner selves are so ugly – their inner depravity is expressed outwardly in their disgusting faces and equally repulsive bodies – science increasingly proves that people look like how they are on the inside: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126957.300-how-your-looks-betray-your-personality.html

      45. gollywog Says:

        Tell me, because I am lost with this one. And it seems to me that the Jewish faith(ful) have been successful in their quest to confuss citizenship(country) with religion.
        A Jew is a Jew. An Israeli is not necessarily a Jew, a citizen of Ireland may not be Catholic.
        What I am saying is do not hate the country if you are going after the religion.
        Jews have been very clever at hiding their mother given religion. And that is where it starts, the mother. Expose the mother expose the religion / cult.
        And shame on Stormfront for not doing their homework.

      46. Mark Says:

        When did Regis become a Semite? He’s Italian and Irish.

      47. Comte Gobineau Was a Crackpot Says:

        The Nazi’s and white men lose a lot of crediblity by going to extremes. Some of the really far out racial analysts develop some entertaining neologisms and terms for their stamp collection observations. I have seen individual Jews up close who look assimilativley like Waylon Jennings and David Allan Coe. It’s true. Could a Nordic specialist provide a substantial explanation of what’s accidental in Rutger Hauer, country music and how Debra Winger got by in Urban Cowboy and Cannery Row?
        Sieg Heil drang nach osten! Chery Ladd was a little corny but too damned cute.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7rhYe6sMtY

      48. S.U.N. Says:

        Forget about those JAPs being white, pretty, or acid-washed, this is the real issue with kikes and that tribe couldn’t care less:

        http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090214/ts_nm/us_madoff_britain

      49. gw Says:

        golly says: Tell me, because I am lost with this one. And it seems to me that the Jewish faith(ful) have been successful in their quest to confuss citizenship(country) with religion.

        You’re not the only one “lost on this one”. A great many people are. We hear the same confusion constantly. Some people just never get it.

        Yes, they Jews have indeed been VERY clever at confusing nationality with religion. They are a persecuted religious group when it suits them. They are a discriminated ethnic group when it suits them. They are a hated race, a despised tribe, a suffering minority group when and where it suits them.

        Whatever will gain them the most sympathy and the most benefits. Whatever will give them the most advantage at any time or place, depending on the country they’re in. They play all sides of the game.

      50. gw Says:

        Gobineau didn’t write any commentary here to criticize. And he was not a crackpot.

        I too, have seen (and known) some “Jews” who looked as Nordic as anyone could be. Certainly not many, but a few. They obviously had a tremendous admixture of Nordic genes in them. I don’t know anything about their geneologies, but I’m sure if you could trace them back you would find a great deal of intermarriage and conversion in their family histories. I call them “Jews” in quotes because racially they’re far more Aryan than Semitic and they’re Jewish only “in their minds” (to borrow Herr H’s words).

        They’re Jewish because they’ve been brought up that way and have been told they’re Jews. To them, I suppose, it’s only a matter of religion, nothing about genes. This reminds me of white children who were captured by Indians and raised among them. There was the famous case, for instance, of Mary Jamison, the “White Woman of the Genesee”. She was a flaxen blond (the Indians called her “Cornsilk”) whose family on the frontier was massacred by Indians in 1758. Carried off as a captive by the Shawnee, she was sold as a slave to the Seneca who adopted her and made her one of their own. She lived as an Indian to age 90, outlived two Indian husbands, had at least 8 children, and when later given her choice to return to white society, chose to spend the rest of her life among the Indians who had become her only family. Whites thought her an oddity. In her own mind, she was an Indian.

        http://www.letchworthparkhistory.com/lpa66.html
        http://colonial-america.suite101.com/article.cfm/mary_jemison_white_woman_of_the_genesee

      51. Futurist Joe Says:

        Yes, good, sexual attraction doesn’t mean that much. In two hundred years assuming no global disaster they probably will have intelligent robots that look as good… and here’s the best part – you can probably trust the robots a whole lot more. It’s not about looking good. It’s about the criminal heart that lacks compassion. I think with the right software the robots are going to come up aces on that too! It’s all what your comparing against. In this case I’m betting on the robots…

      52. Zarathustra Says:

        I heard Regis was at lest part Lebonese. I don’t see a lot of Mick or Wop in him………Wait, am I confusing him with CASEY KASEM? Maybe that’s it…..Kasem is a swarthy little Lebonese twerp and so naturally his wife is tall and blonde.

      53. Curious Says:

        [quote]Comte Gobineau Was a Crackpot Says:

        14 February, 2009 at 4:29 pm

        The Nazi’s and white men lose a lot of crediblity by going to extremes. Some of the really far out racial analysts develop some entertaining neologisms and terms for their stamp collection observations. I have seen individual Jews up close who look assimilativley like Waylon Jennings and David Allan Coe. It’s true. Could a Nordic specialist provide a substantial explanation of what’s accidental in Rutger Hauer, country music and how Debra Winger got by in Urban Cowboy and Cannery Row?
        Sieg Heil drang nach osten! Chery Ladd was a little corny but too damned cute.

        [/quote]

        It is indeed better to compare the jew problem with the nonce problem than with the nigger problem.

      54. Ein Says:

        Futurist Joe Says:
        Yes, good, sexual attraction doesn’t mean that much.
        ———–
        Ever see pack of dogs chasing a female in heat?
        A lot of guys are like that. When they see a nubile female, of any race, they loose all better judgement and turn into panting dogs.
        All their morals and common sense are forgotten in a second.
        When in that state, they are unable to be objective.
        That explains all the interest in this model.

      55. cygnet Says:

        gw? Diamed? Captainchaos? When did MR people start coming here? (Besides me?)

        I like it.

      56. gw Says:

        I am not the same as GW ar MR. I have never posted there. But the mistake is flattering nonetheless.

      57. sgruber Says:

        No jews, just right.

        They are a genetically distinct tribe. All this jewy special pleading that “jews are White” because “some have blue eyes,” “some have blond hair,” “goll-ee, that jewess shore wuz a sweet piece of ass!” is

        a. ignorance compounded by stupidity; or

        b. jew infiltrators posing as White.

        I say it’s jew infiltrators. I’ve noticed some infiltrators on the Steve Sailer site who are urging anti-immigrationists to “read the white supremacists out” and “join with us Jews, make us your allies.” Yet HERE (pdf) is what Jews did to immigration. These god-damned demons. They caused the problem that NOW they claim they want to solve – on condition that “white supremacism” be eliminated from the movement.

        Then we have Diamed saying shit like this: Given their intelligence it’s obvious we want jews on our side, not against us, interbreed and they’ll be white soon enough, and the whole issue will become moot.

        “Our side” is: death to the jews. By “jews on our side,” are you saying you want them to kill themselves?

        Interbreed? The jew genotype is passed down through the mother. OF COURSE jews want a percentage of jewesses breeding with White men: it creates more jews, and fewer Whites, in one stroke!

        Look at what happened to American and Britain. That is what comes of interbreeding with jews.

        I go by the “one-drop” rule when it comes to these creatures. And so do jews. Jew Nicholas Stix is on record (in his interviews with Alex Linder) as saying there is no such thing as a HALF-jew.

        NEWSFLASH FELLAS, ALL JEWS ARE BAD. No jew is good. If you think you’ve found a “good jew,” a “sweet jew,” a “purty jew,” just wait a little while – you’ll find out the truth (assuming you get out some, and you don’t have rocks in your head).

        No jews, just right

      58. cygnet Says:

        I think Diamed may already have discarnated and moved on to a new sockdentity.

      59. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

        Getting ready to “sock it to us”

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCp8Edp4pfo&feature=related

      60. gw Says:

        “These god-damned demons. They caused the problem that NOW they claim they want to solve – on condition that “white supremacism” be eliminated from the movement.”

        Yes, isn’t that SO typical? First they cause a problem; then they step up and offer to fix it for you. (But only AFTER you give them the power to do so, of course.)

      61. Krystian Kazimierzowicz Kowalczyk Says:

        Justin Huber said:From what I’ve read (in Hitler’s Table Talk etc.) he seems to have had a very low opinion of Eastern Europeans, particulary Russians. Many of these people certainly “look white”.

        His hatred of Slavs was based upon German nationalism and their hundreds of years of violent competition with Slavs. It was not based on any ontological certainty that Slavs were “subhumans” – funny, isn’t it, Hitler never lived to see those “subhuman” Russian scientists put the first man in space. Nor did he ever know what DNA was, either. There were a great many things he didn’t see.

        LoveWhite said: Slavs are definitely a sub group the white race, and many of them are very white indeed. Quite a few WNs think Hitler was too harsh in his evaluation of the them. The Russians as part of the Slav group are no lowly branch if you consider their accomplishments in science, technology and the arts.

        Understatement of the year, kiddo. Especially considering many Whites in America are, ipso facto, “subhumans” by NS reckoning. Why don’t you ask Andrei Kievsky, who does more for our cause than most of you, what he thinks of being considered “subhuman”? Or perhaps my IQ of 2 standard deviations above the mean is just an aberration, considering that I’m a quarter-subhuman?

        You Slav-haters are living a destructive, wild-eyed fantasy (Teutonic superiority) that is founded not in science or ontology but in romantic quasi-religious ideals that are long past their sell-by date.

      62. Z.O.G. Says:

        cygnet Says:
        16 February, 2009 at 10:07 pm

        I think Diamed may already have discarnated and moved on to a new sockdentity.

        LOL I like those new words.

      63. gw Says:

        Krys said: “His hatred of Slavs was based upon German nationalism and their hundreds of years of violent competition with Slavs. It was not based on any ontological certainty that Slavs were “subhumans” –

        I consider that “hatred” very unfortunate, but we shouldn’t let that detract from his wisdom in understanding the overall European predicament and what was coming in the future. Let’s remember that Europe at that time was full of petty ethnic hatreds of one group against another. Everybody hated each other. But before that there had been other times of as much cooperation as competition.

        Herr H. came from Linz, in Austria, very near the border of what became Czechoslovakia (Slavs, basically). Humiliated and smarting from the defeat, reduced from a great power to a tiny state, Austrians were searching for an explanation. Herr H. ascribed Austria’s defeat and partitition to the ethnic divisions and hatreds that had riddled the Austro-Hungarian Empire which was full of competing minorities — balkanized, as it were — much as the USA is getting to be today. He had a valid point there. Austria was weakened by its “diversity”. Diversity was NOT what made them strong! And he realized it. However, there was one group that encouraged this diversity, that fattened off disorder and chaos and hid among the diverse groups. And he recognized that too.

        This ethnic hostility was not limited just to Austria. Even Prussians looked down on Austrians and they still laugh at Bavarians. Hungarians and Czechs hated each other, for instance. I once worked with a Hungarian woman (in the USA) who had a Czech-sounding name. I was curious and asked her about it; she sheepishly conceded to me that she had married “one of our enemies.” She seemed very embarrassed to admit it, like she had done something awful. (Or maybe the names were reversed. I forget now.)

        At the end of the First WW, everybody hated each other. Irish and English were at each other’s throats, Russians and Finns, Russians and Poles, Swedes and Norwegians, Hungarians and Romanians, Romanians and Bulgarians.

        As a child, I once had a music teacher who had lived in Central Europe just prior to WW2. I forget just what country she was from, but I remember her telling about the hatred between countries which was so great that when the train was traveling near the border they were required to pull down the shades, as they were NOT ALLOWED EVEN TO LOOK AT THE LAND OF THE OTHER COUNTRY!

        It’s in that context that Herr H’s views about other nationalities has to be understood. His was another time. He had other issues that are not ours. But some of them still are.

        In my view, these “Slav haters” (as Kristian calls them) are an embarassment and an impediment. They could very well be sowing dissention deliberately just to be provocative. Some trolls do the same to offend Italians. I am against anyone who rocks the boat. We need to repect each other! We need white unity.

      64. Krystian Kazimierzowicz Kowalczyk Says:

        Spot on, gw. White Unity is my goal as well. I’ve said before: if you are a Euro-gentile, I don’t care whether you’re Teuton, Latin, Slav, Ugric, Baltic, Celtic or any other persuasion. I am for the survival of all European ethnies and will ally with Euro ethno-nationalists of any stripe.

        But if when people start talking about eliminating Eastern European “subhumans” those people become my enemies. And none of us need more enemies, do we? The ZOG is enough.

      65. Zarathustra Says:

        But what about the White and nearly White native inhabitants in mostly non-White places like Iraq and Afghanistan? There are even a few semi-Whites in Mongolia, the descendants of Scythian warriors. How should they be classified?

      Leave a Reply

      You may use the following HTML tags in your comments.

      <a abbr acronym b blockquote cite code del em i q strike strong>