25 March, 2009

Feasting on the Sheep

Posted by Socrates in Holocaust, holocaust racket, Socrates, William Pierce at 1:01 am | Permanent Link

by Dr. William Pierce.

“Well, I knew it was coming — in fact, I predicted it when I spoke with you more than a year ago about the Jewish extortion campaign against Switzerland. I told you that if the Jews succeeded in sucking the blood they were demanding out of the Swiss, eventually they would come for our blood too. And now they’re here, demanding that Americans also pay them back for their losses during the so-called ‘Holocaust,’ just the way the Germans and the Swiss and the French and the Dutch and others have been forced to pay them. I made that prediction, because I know the Jews. I know that they always will be looking for more victims until they have sucked all of the blood there is to be sucked from this planet, and then they will turn on each other and begin sucking their fellow Jews’ blood. They cannot help it. It is their nature to be deceivers and destroyers and blood suckers.”

The rest is [Here]. (For the audio version, go [Here] and scroll down to 09-16-2000).


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 03/07/19 Feasting on the Sheep 84% similar
  3. 06/22/11 Feasting on the Sheep 84% similar
  4. 09/28/16 Feasting on the Sheep 57% similar
  5. 07/30/08 Ratcheting Up the Pro-America Propaganda to Aid the ‘War on Terror’ 25% similar
  6. 10/22/14 The Holocaust Shakedown 25% similar
  7. 15 Responses to “Feasting on the Sheep”

    1. Zarathustra Says:

      Why didn’t Pierce ever use words like Chink, Spook or Wop? I think it’s funny to use disparaging terms against people sometimes. It helps de-humanize them when they derserve to be dehumanized.

    2. gw Says:

      ‘Why didn’t Pierce ever use words like Chink, Spook or Wop? ”

      Probably because he didn’t think it was funny.

    3. ED! Says:

      Or because he was dead serious about this damn obvious threat to the White Race!

      Former NA member ED!

    4. Glenn Miller Says:

      Nobody ever explained the jews quite as persuasively as Dr William Pierce. In the 70s and 80s it was Dr Pierce more than anyone else who made me jew-wise, anti-semitic, and an activist. I don’t think I ever started a Pierce article and then put it down before I’d read it entirely – all were so compelling, captivating and utterly spell binding.

    5. Socrates Says:

      Zarathustra Says: “Pierce’s broadcasts were too angry and negative. It was an approach which tended to attract psychos, flake-o’s and other fringe elements instead of appealing to the more normal, stable types who could have been persuaded.”

      Ok, Zara, your disinformation-specialist undergarments are starting to show. In fact, ever since you kinda-sorta praised Cuban leader Raul Castro (!), and then criticized totalitarianism a few months later, I’ve been skeptical of you. Call me too paranoid, but WN has way too many disinfo agents as it is. We don’t need more. Must we get “anti” crap here, too? Fuck…

    6. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      Top three posters need to read the article. Here, Dr.Pierce in his own words, from the above article:

      “You know, some people criticize me because I am not polite enough in
      talking about the Jews. They believe that it is very vulgar of me to
      refer to the Jews as vampires or bloodsuckers or parasites.”

    7. Ein Says:

      “Ok, Zara, you’re disinformation-specialist undergarments are starting to show.”

      I will reserve judgement; but I must say that I don’t care for his frequent use of such terms as wops, micks, polacks, etc. These insulting terms are NOT “funny”!!! They only serve to alienate and divide rather than unite. What is funny about dehumanizing people? In the past, I have defended Zara from attacks too — just as I have defended others. We don’t need that sort of stuff here. As I’ve said before, what we need is unity, not disunity. Anyone who sows disunity is an enemy.

      I hope he’s not an enemy, but just occasionally tactless and indiscrete. That much can be forgiven.

      Use of such terms as “parasites”, however is simply a description of fact. What fact is described by Wop?

    8. Socrates Says:

      shabbos: yes, indeed. Some people can’t read. Or they want to stir shit.

    9. Ein Says:

      “Ok, Zara, you’re disinformation-specialist undergarments are starting to show.”

      I will reserve judgement. However, I must say that I do dislike his frequent use of such terms as mick, wop, polack, etc.. These disparaging terms are NOT “funny”!!! What they are is insulting and alienating, that’s all. What is funny about “dehumanizing” people? What is to be gained by alienating people? Subtle (and not so subtle) hints that certain people among us are “not really white” serve only to divide, not unite. And insulting other (non-white) groups gets us nowhere. It’s non-productive. In fact, it’s counter-productive. We don’t need that sort of thing. What is to be gained by it? I’ve said consistently that what we need is unity, not disunity. Anyone who undermines that unity is an enemy.

      In the past, I have defended Zara too, and would again, just as I have come to the defense of others. I hope he is not an enemy, but just occasionally indiscrete. That much can be forgiven.

      As for Pierce, use of such a term as “parasite” is simply a realistic description of fact. That’s what they are! What’s “funny” about it? Pierce was not attempting to be amusing. But what fact does Wop describe?

    10. Ein Says:

      My post didn’t seem to go. It got lost somewhere. I’ll write it again.

      “Ok, Zara, you’re disinformation-specialist undergarments are starting to show.”

      I will reserve judgement. However, I must say that I do dislike his frequent use of such terms as mick, wop, polack, etc.. These disparaging terms are NOT “funny”!!! What they are is insulting and alienating, that’s all. What is funny about “dehumanizing” people? What is to be gained by alienating people? Subtle (and not so subtle) hints that certain people among us are “not really white” serve only to divide, not unite. And insulting other (non-white) groups gets us nowhere. It’s non-productive. In fact, it’s counter-productive. We don’t need that sort of thing. What is to be gained by it? I’ve said consistently that what we need is unity, not disunity. Anyone who undermines that unity is an enemy.

      In the past, I have often defended Zara too, and would again, just as I have come to the defense of others. I hope he is not an enemy, but just occasionally indiscrete. That much can be forgiven.

      As for Pierce, use of such a term as “parasite” is simply a realistic description of fact. That’s what they are. What’s “funny” about it? Pierce was not attempting to be amusing. But what fact does Wop describe?

    11. Socrates Says:

      VNN’s oldest troll, now calling itself “someone zarathustra himself called a jew, go figure” Says:

      “but he’s quite obviously, to anyone but you, just a regular guy with an approach different from yours, which is uptight, paranoid, petty and purblind.”

      “Purblind”? Holy shit! Now there’s a word. Here’s a clue, anus. When you’re a Jewish feminist at an Ivy League university Back East who is posing as a WN for trolling purposes, it’s best not to use words like “purblind.” We don’t use words like that. Okay? Better luck next month, anus…”purblind”…ha-ha!!

    12. Captainchaos Says:

      One time that dipshit Zarathustra accused me of spreading disinformation, Jew-style, when I stated the widely agreed upon figure of around 50 dead Europeans as a result of WWII. That stuck in my mind.

    13. Captainchaos Says:

      50 million dead

    14. gw Says:

      Captainchaos Says: One time that dipshit Zarathustra accused me of spreading disinformation, Jew-style

      Sometimes, I’ve had to wonder. Even very recently. But always, on second thought, I held off saying anything.

      He’s insulted virtually everyone here, indirectly in some way, while taking offense when he’s been insulted himself. Well, if you can dish it out, you have to be able to take it too.

    15. gw Says:

      “I predicted it when I spoke with you more than a year ago about the Jewish extortion campaign against Switzerland.”

      They may not be through with Switzerland yet. I’m not quite sure what’s going on right now, or if it’s connected in any way with these financial scandals that are rocking the global economy, but I saw a news item a few weeks ago, in South America, that Switzerland has finally — relenting to intense pressure from the US — consented to relax (or violate!) some of its banking secrecy laws and reveal holdings in some Swiss accounts.

      This will be the first time in centuries, and a drastic change for Switzerland. Their large banking industry has been based on this inviolable secrecy. I don’t who is behind this intense pressure or to what purpose. I only skimmed the article and didn’t have time to finish it. In all cases such as this, I have to be suspicious of what’s REALLY going on. But we know that wherever there’s the smell of money, Jews will be after it like sharks drawn by blood.

      Oh, and speaking about Jews chasing after money, has everyone noticed that that sleazy lawyer (Howard Stern) who was representing Anna Nicole Smith and claimed to be the father of her child (and thus would in sole control of her fortune) has been arrested for keeping her hooked on massive amounts of pills? Her mother (a policewoman) always said she never trusted him and that when he was around, people died.