3 April, 2009

Faurisson Calls for Weber’s Resignation from IHR

Posted by Socrates in IHR, revisionism, Robert Faurisson, Socrates at 10:24 pm | Permanent Link

“Mark Weber must resign from the Institute for Historical Review” says Faurisson:

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 01/11/09 How Relevant is Holocaust Revisionism? 45% similar
  3. 10/19/09 Review of Thomas Wheatland’s The Frankfurt School in Exile, Part I: Authoritarianism and the Family 42% similar
  4. 11/19/08 France: Police Raid Faurisson’s Home Again 42% similar
  5. 01/29/08 Robert Faurisson Arrested, His Home Searched 37% similar
  6. 03/11/09 Victory for Israel Lobby: Charles Freeman Jr. Quits 34% similar
  7. 31 Responses to “Faurisson Calls for Weber’s Resignation from IHR”

    1. No Retreat Says:

      Good God why does Faurisson make such a fuss. It’s obvoius to anyone with half a brain that Weber has been bought or blackmailed by the Jews, or that he is a crypto, with the instruction: savagely attack Israel as cover but derail and corrupt revisionism.

      If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, looks like a duck, it is a duck.

    2. Junghans Says:

      What more needs to be said than, vive frere Faurisson!

    3. No Retreat Says:

      To add to my comment above: of course Faurisson is right calling for Weber’s resignation. I had forgotten he was doing that – the title of this piece.

      I had just read all of his letters to Weber before my comment above, and couldn’t understand why he couldn’t see Weber was an anti 20 years ago.

    4. Ernst Blofeld Says:

      I hope one day to see a statue of Faurisson in every European capital. He will be regarded as one of the most noble men of our race for his bravery, a true Galileo of our time.

    5. Truthteller Says:

      I see the Voice of Treason is allowing Weber airtime. WTF are they thinking? Weber has squandered millions of revisionist and WN donation dollars. He has turned a once vibrant organization into a news clipping service. Weber cancelled the Journal for Historical Review. He cancelled the IHR annual conferences. He has denounced Holocaust Revisionism in a recent article in January. All Revisionists have no called for his removal as director and further total removal from the IHR also.

      At what point do people ‘get the message?’

    6. sgruber Says:

      I wonder if Weber is a jew.

    7. gw Says:

      “I wonder if Weber is a jew.”

      It’s a good question. But that has been discussed here very recently.

      Personally, I sort of doubt it. But he could be. Probably he’s just a spineless gentile — a total, useless, weaking.

      But why did Faurisson take 30 years to come to this conclusion?

    8. Z.O.G. Says:

      Note that “Weber” is an EXTREMELY common Jewish German surname.

      Soundex:
      779000

      Name:
      WEBER

      Databases:

      ABCDGHIJKMNOQRSTUVWXZabdegimop

    9. Z.O.G. Says:

      Weber is most likely a crypto. When I look at a picture of his face, my Jewdar goes off.

      And in addition to his appearance, his voice is also very Jewish sounding.

    10. Z.O.G. Says:

      http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dxnbK-v-CBo/R_oiL-16kfI/AAAAAAAAAaQ/IoVykpdrZrA/s320/mark_weber%5B1%5D.JPG

    11. 2050 Says:

      See, there you go.
      I thought weber was a good white name, and I google it and find out it’s a common jew name. Huh.

    12. Z.O.G. Says:

      http://www.revisionists.com/photos/weber3.jpg

    13. Z.O.G. Says:

      http://www.revisionists.com/photos/mark_weber_002.jpg

    14. Truthteller Says:

      That photo of him on the Voice of Treason website looks like a Rabbi.

    15. gw Says:

      “See, there you go.
      I thought weber was a good white name”

      It’s one of those iffy names that could go either way. Webber would be English, and not Jewish (as there were no Jews in England durig the Middle Ages). Weber is the German equivalent. It meant simply a weaver. That would not likely have been a Jewish occupation. But by extension, it could come to mean a dealer in fabrics, owner of a cloth business, a cloth merchant. In that case, its implications become something quite different.

      I wouldn’t think the name tells us very much, one way or the other. I find the first name, Mark, slightly more significant. Jews do favor gentile-sounding names like “Mark”. Crypo-Jews, that is.

      I also don’t get anything out of the photo, one way or another. I’ve no opinion there. I will say though, that his features are NOT Semitic. There could be something Ashkenazic there, maybe, but not Semitic.

    16. gw Says:

      Note that “Weber” is an EXTREMELY common Jewish German surname.

      Yes, but if you were to look at a list of German gentiles you would find that it is extremely common among them too. There would have been a lot of weavers in Germany.

      In other words, Weber is just an extremely common name in Germany. So this doesn’t realy prove anything except that Weber is a popular German name, just like Schmidt (Smith)or Mueller (Miller). Lots of people had it.

      Sometimes a name can be helpful and revealing; in this case I don’t think it tells us much. If his name were Cohen, now THAT would be different!!!

    17. Z.O.G. Says:

      Little known fact:

      “Miller” is the third most common surname for American Jews.

      ;-)

    18. Z.O.G. Says:

      I will say though, that his features are NOT Semitic. There could be something Ashkenazic there, maybe, but not Semitic.

      Of course his features aren’t Semitic. 80%+ of the earth’s Jews are Ashkenazi. So naturally Weber would be an Ashkenazi Jew, not a Sephardic one. Duh.

    19. Truthteller Says:

      jew or not it has been proven that he ripped off millions from the WN/Patriot/Revisionist movement while doing nothing but pulling the plug on projects.

    20. gw Says:

      So naturally Weber would be an Ashkenazi Jew, not a Sephardic one. Duh.

      Right. That figures. But my point was that it doesn’t fit with the dark, hook-nosed stereotype which is often so misleading and which many people expect. If that Semitic stereotype is what someone is looking for, they’re not going to find it. (As in the cartoons shown here. They are funny but very misleading.)

      Regarding Miller, I don’t doubt it is common among German Jews. But I also don’t doubt that it’s extremely common among ALL German people. So that doesn’t make it a Jewish name; it just makes it a name that a lot of people have. Anybody from Germany.

      Of course, to be precise, “Miller” is not even a German name but an anglicization from the German “Müller”. If it’s Miller of English origin, it wouldn’t be Jewish at all, for the same reason as Webber.

    21. Truthteller Says:

      Spread this link far and wide

      http://www.robertfaurisson.blogspot.com

    22. Truthteller Says:

      In 2001 former IHR employee stated that he overheard a conversation between Mark Weber and Greg Raven about selling the Liberty Lobby mailing list to the ADL.

    23. Eric Owens Says:

      In 2001 former IHR employee stated that he overheard a conversation between Mark Weber and Greg Raven about selling the Liberty Lobby mailing list to the ADL.

    24. Jon Says:

      A) Lots of Jews have German surnames. IMO, a good portion of those unaccounted for Jews of Europe wound up (in America!) before, during and after WWII. Hence the preponderance of Jews with orginally-German surnames.

      B) My first impression upon viewing Weber’s countenance years ago, was that he was highly suspect. I just viewed an older pic of him on Google images and, sure ’nuff, he looks even Heebier. I’d really be surprised if he’s not an ethnic Jew. If not, based upon his ethnic look, I’d have to say that he is of some sort of non-Jewish, semitic extraction.

      Either way, if he’s now denouncing revisionism, then he sold out or is being blackmailed and deserves our contempt.

      Jon

    25. Ein Says:

      A friend of mine who has met Weber and knows people who know him has no opinion as to whether he’s Jewish. But he says that he is a poor manager and has dificultty dealing with other people, also that he has his “problems” (no idea what that means). Apparently, he’s kind of detatched and unrealistic. I’ve no knowledgde about the Jewish aspect; but I will say that Jews have an uncanny way of finding their way into positions like that, where they can be in control of things. One of their strategies is that if they can’t destroy a movement, they will at least infiltrate and control it. There are many, many crypto-Jews out there who could fill such a role. And they haven’t been officially Jewish for several generations, so no one would know. I don’t mean to sound paranoid, but I’m sure there are many more of them than we would even imagine.

    26. Ein Says:

      Jon Says:
      “Lots of Jews have German surnames. IMO, a good portion of those unaccounted for Jews of Europe wound up (in America!) before, during and after WWII. Hence the preponderance of Jews with orginally-German surnames.”

      Madeleine “Albright” is a very good example of someone who (she claims) didn’t even know she was Jewish. John “Kerry”is another. There must be a huge humber of them. And those are only the ones whose families came here fairly recently, in the 20th century.

      I remember Herr H. mentioning in “Mein Kampf” (which I read years ago) the large number of Jews who had left Germany in the 1800s and had gone to America where they passed themselves off as “Germans”…. and the naive Americans didn’t know any better. Yes, there must be a lot of them.

    27. shabbos s shabazz Says:

      “I’ll note here that in general Weber is an atrocious debater, careful as he is to ingratiate himself with the opponent or the master of ceremonies, sometimes even to the point where one may wonder what side he’s on.” R. Faurisson

      Old saying- a liberal is one who cannot take his own side in an argument. (Robert Frost)

    28. Justin Huber Says:

      I wish that Webber would just come out and say what he believes occured in regards to the “Holocaust”. He at least owes people that much. Admittedly, Weber is in a tough spot. Anytime anyone even questions Holocaust claims, they’re immediately hammered. My feeling is that Weber probably believes that there were mass killings of Jews but probably doubts the existence of gas chambers. The question then becomes how many Jews were killed in World War II and in what way? Myself, I have doubts about the 6 million claim. I think it’s more plausable that the number is anywher between 2-4 million. That’s just my belief based on what I’ve read Revisionist and Non-Revisionist. At least I’ll come out and say that. Weber won’t and that is what is driving people crazy.

    29. Truthteller Says:

      Faurisson proves in his article that Weber WAS NEVER a committed revisionist. Weber is feeding off the IHR body which is in advanced state of decay, thanks to years of Weber’s do nothing lazy and indolant behaviour. Weber has sucked off the IHR tit for long enough.

    30. Howdy Doody Says:

      Truthteller Says:

      8 April, 2009 at 11:34 pm

      Faurisson proves in his article that Weber WAS NEVER a committed revisionist. Weber is feeding off the IHR body which is in advanced state of decay, thanks to years of Weber’s do nothing lazy and indolant behaviour. Weber has sucked off the IHR tit for long enough.

      ============================================

      FORD FOUNDATION, eaten out and it held by the enemy aliens.

      If there is a charity or any tax exempt operation they are in there like a tick/joo.

      I won’t give that title a capital letter etc.

    31. David Baker Says:

      The effectiveness of the IHR brought into focus key elements of revisionist theory which most assuredly upset the Jews. Anyone who knows the “Chosen” well realizes they have many tricks up their sleeves to derail efforts to scrutinize their precious “Holocaust”. What truly branded the IHR as Public (Jewish Public…) Enemy Numero Uno was and is their devotion to scholarly observation of historical events. Mr. Weber was part and parcel of that thorough re-examination. However, lately he’s been acting as if his particular opinion has been misinterpreted, and he demures to the Jewish affront against revisionist speakers. Rather that simply address the many heated questions spewing from the mouths of his incongruous radio hosts, he acknowledges their “proof” of the Holocaust, which is little more than propaganda on the order of Nuremberg. The effect this has on the revisionist community is profound. We seem to have been ‘outed’ as Neo Nazis, whose thirst for Jewish blood can never be slaked. We have placed all of our revisionist eggs in a basket that seems to be deteriorating, and or sabotaged. The Jews apparently have either gained control of Mr. Weber, or they have simply created a disinformation ruse in order to humiliate anyone who confronts the sacred memory of Jewish ‘Victims’. The fact is, there IS NO PROOF that the Holocaust occurred. There are no names of Jewish people executed in gas chambers. The reason is: No Jews were executed in Gas Chambers! Virtually every gruesome testimony of the so-called “Survivors” of the Holocaust was a rehash of WWI atrocity propaganda. Indeed, some embellishments were added, but the Jews have now to PROVE what they claimed. Unfortunately, Mark Weber will not stand in the way of those ridiculous anecdotes.