2 May, 2009

Jewish Insanity: Largely Undiagnosed

Posted by Socrates in immigration, jew mentality, jewed culture, Jewish paranoia, Jewish Tyranny, Socrates, Western culture at 1:43 pm | Permanent Link

The Jews are so sure that every White person is a closet anti-Semite ready to p-p-poisecute them that they’re willing to destroy Western culture in order to “save” themselves. It’s pure insanity, and it’s…all your fault! Yes! Some way, somehow, The Other is to blame for their insanity. Jews are always innocent, Whites are always guilty, case closed:


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 04/30/17 Alex Linder on the Jewish Problem and How It Should Be Handled 31% similar
  3. 04/21/14 New Stuff from Alex Linder 30% similar
  4. 02/03/18 About Jewish Radicalism, in Three Parts 30% similar
  5. 03/21/09 More Proof That Intelligence is Largely Inherited 29% similar
  6. 09/16/07 Greenspan: Iraq War Largely About Oil 27% similar
  7. 18 Responses to “Jewish Insanity: Largely Undiagnosed”

    1. shabbos s shabazz Says:

      Malignant Narcissism: Quotations from (Xtian) M. Scott Peck’s People of the Lie

      Steve and I will have been out of the Assembly fourteen years, as of March 3, 2004. We’ve dug into George’s teaching, his character and his abusive behavior and written articles about it over the years. But now, a year after his excommunication, it is evident to us that things were a lot worse than we had ever thought. The revelations of his immorality and the cover-up of David’s domestic violence were shocking. His behavior since then of scornful impunity, and the devastation we have seen in people’s lives, bring to mind parallels with The People of the Lie, a study of malignant narcissism by Dr. M. Scott Peck, who also wrote The Road Less Traveled.

      In the course of his career as a psychiatrist, Dr. Peck encountered several clients whose malignant narcissism didn’t quite fit the categories of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. In People of the Lie he looks in depth at the characteristics of these individuals. His purpose is not to present a biblical study of evil. Rather, he proposes evil as a diagnosis of pathology for these people. His concept of evil clarifies the nature of malignant narcissism and offers another useful category, in addition to abuse of authority and aberrant teaching, for understanding George Geftakys and the Assembly. Here are quotations from the book, organized under the main characteristics of the people Dr. Peck calls “evil”.

      Refusal to acknowledge sin

      It is necessary that we first draw the distinction between evil and ordinary sin. It is not their sins per se that characterize evil people…The central defect of the evil is not the sin but the refusal to acknowledge it.p 69

      If evil people cannot be defined by the illegality of their deeds or the magnitude of their sins, then how are we to define them? The answer is by the consistency of their sins. While usually subtle, their destructiveness is remarkably consistent. This is because those who have “crossed over the line” are characterized by their absolute refusal to tolerate the sense of their own sinfulness.p 71

      The evil hate the light–the light of goodness that shows them up, the light of scrutiny that exposes them, the light of truth that penetrates their deception.p 179 Rather than blissfully lacking a sense of morality, like the sociopath, they are continually engaged in sweeping the evidence of their evil under the rug of their own consciousness.p 76

      The poor in spirit do not commit evil. Evil is not committed by people who feel uncertain about their righteousness, who question their own motives, who worry about betraying themselves. The evil in this world is committed by the spiritual fat cats, by the Pharisees of our own day, the self-righteous who think they are without sin because they are unwilling to suffer the discomfort of significant self-examination.

      Unpleasant though it may be, the sense of personal sin is precisely that which keeps our sin from getting out of hand. It is quite painful at times, but it is a very great blessing because it is our one and only effective safeguard against our own proclivity for evil. p 71-72
      Self Image of Perfection

      Utterly dedicated to preserving their self-image of perfection, [the evil] are unceasingly engaged in the effort to maintain the appearance of moral purity. They worry about this a great deal. They are acutely sensitive to social norms and what others might think of them. Outwardly [they] seem to live lives that are above reproach. The words “image.” “appearance,” and “outwardly” are crucial to understanding the morality of the evil.p 75
      Excessive intolerance of criticism

      In Martin Buber’s words, the malignantly narcissistic insist upon “affirmation independent of all findings.” p 80 Self-criticism is a call to personality change…The evil are pathologically attached to the status quo of their personalities, which in their narcissism they consciously regard as perfect. I think it is quite possible that the evil may perceive even a small degree of change in their beloved selves as representing total annihilation. p 74

      [Evil is] the use of power to destroy the spiritual growth of others for the purpose of defending and preserving the integrity of our own sick selves. In short, it is scapegoating. 119 A predominant characteristic…of the behavior of those I call evil is scapegoating. Because in their hearts they consider themselves above reproach, they must lash out at any one who does reproach them. They sacrifice others to preserve their self-image of perfection. p 73

      Since the evil, deep down, feel themselves to be faultless, it is inevitable that when they are in conflict with the world they will invariably perceive the conflict as the world’s fault. Since they must deny their own badness, they must perceive others as bad.

      They project their own evil onto the world. They never think of themselves as evil; on the other hand, they consequently see much evil in others…Evil, then, is most often committed in order to scapegoat, and the people I label as evil are chronic scapegoaters….The evil attack others instead of facing their own failures. p 73-74
      Disguise and pretense

      While they seem to lack any motivation to be good, they intensely desire to appear good. Their “goodness” is all on a level of pretense. It is, in effect, a lie. That is why they are the “people of the lie”. The wickedness of the evil is not committed directly, but indirectly as a part of this cover-up process. p 76

      Those who are evil are masters of disguise; they are not apt to wittingly disclose their true colors–either to others or to themselves. p 104 Because they are such experts at disguise, it is seldom possible to pinpoint the maliciousness of the evil. The disguise is usually impenetrable p 76….Naturally, since it is designed to hide its opposite, the pretense chosen by the evil is most commonly the pretense of love. p 106
      Intellectual deviousness

      [A] reaction that the evil frequently engender in us is confusion. Describing an encounter with an evil person, one woman wrote, it was “as if I’d suddenly lost my ability to think”….This reaction is quite appropriate. Lies confuse. The evil are “the people of the lie”, deceiving others as they also build layer upon layer of self-deception.

      I know now that one of the characteristics of evil is its desire to confuse. p 179

      [The evil] are, in my experience, remarkably greedy people. Thus, they are cheap. p 72.
      Unsubmitted will

      If the central defect of the evil is not one of conscience, then where does it reside? The essential psychological problem of human evil, I believe is a particular variety of narcissism….The particular brand of narcissism that characterizes evil people seems to be one that particularly afflicts the will. p 80

      Malignant narcissism is characterized by an unsubmitted will. All adults who are mentally healthy submit themselves one way or another to something higher than themselves, be it God or truth or love or some other ideal….They believe in what is true rather than what they would like to be true.

      In summary, to a greater or lesser degree, all mentally healthy individuals submit themselves to the demands of their own conscience. Not so the evil, however….They are men and women of obviously strong will, determined to have their own way. p 78 Such people literally live “in a world of their own” in which the self reigns supreme. p 162
      Coercion and control of others

      [Evil is] the exercise of political power–that is, the imposition of one’s will upon others by overt or covert coercion–in order to avoid…spiritual growth…Because their willfulness is so extraordinary–and always accompanied by a lust for power–I suspect that the evil are more likely than most to politically aggrandize themselves…..There is a remarkable power in the manner in which they attempt to control others.p 78

      [In describing one of his patients, Peck says] Charlene’s desire to make a conquest of me….to utterly control our relationship, knew no bounds. It seemed to be a desire for power purely for its own sake. p 176 She wanted the reigns in her hands every moment. p 158
      Lack of empathy

      Theirs is a brand of narcissism so total that they seem to lack, in whole or in part, the capacity for empathy…Their narcissism makes the evil dangerous not only because it motivates them to scapegoat others but also because it deprives them of the restraint that results from empathy and respect for others.

      In addition to the fact that the evil need victims to sacrifice to their narcissism, their narcissism permits them to ignore the humanity of their victims as well….The blindness of the narcissist to others can extend even beyond a lack of empathy; narcissists may not “see” others at all.

      There are boundaries to the individual soul. And in our dealings with each other we generally respect these boundaries. It is characteristic of–and prerequisite for–mental health both that our own ego boundaries should be clear and that we should clearly recognize the boundaries of others. We must know where we end and others begin. p 136-137
      Symbiotic relationship

      Another form of devastation that narcissistic intrusiveness can create is the symbiotic relationship. “Symbiosis”–as we use the term in psychiatry–is not a mutually beneficial state of interdependence. Instead it refers to a mutually parasitic and destructive coupling. In the symbiotic relationship neither partner will separate from the other even though it would obviously be beneficial to each if they could. p 137

      I doubt that it is possible for two utterly evil people to live together in the close quarters of a sustained marriage. They would be too destructive for the necessary cooperation….In every evil couple, if we could examine them closely enough, I image we would find one partner at least slightly in thrall to the other. p 119 For adults to be the victims of evil, they too must be powerless to escape….They may be powerless by virtue of their own failure of courage….bound by chains of laziness and dependency. p 119-120
      Evil in families

      It is my experience that evil seems to run in families. p 80 If evil were easy to recognize, identify and manage, there would be no need for this book. But the fact of the matter is that it is the most difficult of all things with which to cope. p 130 [Evil] will contaminate or otherwise destroy a person who remains too long in its presence. p 65

      The evil deny the suffering of their guilt–the painful awareness of their sin, inadequacy, and imperfection–by casting their pain onto the other through projection and scapegoating. They themselves may not suffer, but those around them do. The evil cause suffering. The evil create for those under their dominion a miniature sick society. p 123-124

      It happens then, that the children of evil parents enter adulthood with very significant psychiatric disturbances. ….It is doubtful that some can be wholly healed of their scars from having had to live in close quarters with evil without correctly naming the source of their problems.

      To come to terms with evil in one’s parentage is perhaps the most difficult and painful psychological task a human being can be called on to face. Most fail and so remain its victims. Those who fully succeed in developing the necessary searing vision are those who are able to name it. p 130


      See also scapegoating:

      “On the Day of Atonement a live goat was chosen by lot. The high priest, robed in linen garments, laid both his hands on the goat’s head, and confessed over it the iniquities of the children of Israel. The sins of the people thus symbolically transferred to the beast (Whites), it was taken out into the wilderness and let go. The people felt purged, and for the time being, guiltless.”


    2. Howdy Doody Says:

      Itz a “Catch 22” in the flesh.

    3. Parsifal Says:

      Whatever malevolent new movement the Jews dream up to inflict on the GOYIM, it always blows up in their ugly camel faces sooner or later, whether it’s Christianity, Communism, Global Capitalism, Zionism or mass immigration. The Jew is a neurotic destroyer of nations and of himself.

    4. skywriter Says:

      What is this hatred of Christianity I see all the time in the WN movement? You people sound like a bunch of Jews when you rag on Christianity.

      Ponder this: When Christianity was in ascendancy, the West was united and thrived. As Christianity declined, so has the West. Maybe God is trying to tell you geniuses something.

      And stop saying Christianity is Jewish. The Jews hate Christianity and have done everything to try and stop it or pervert it. It has not served their purposes one bit. Self sacrifice and love is poison to Jewish machinations.

      Evangelicalism is not real Christianity and has been financed by Jews ever since the 19th Century, to help dupe Christians into supporting Jews and Zionism. Mainline Christianity has somewhat resisted this inclination, but no worse than any other institution. The problem is the same everywhere, ignorant, cowardly sheep and infiltrated leaders, not Christianity.

      If the Jew can infiltrate every organization, do you think the Church would be untouched? Even Christ warned of the wolves in sheep’s clothing.

      Multiculturalism is not part of Christian doctrine. That’s a falsehood, like many bad ideas that have seemingly creeped or been ascribed to the Church. In fact, there is freedom in Christ, like the freedom of association. And yet, I’ve never heard a multicultural sermon either.

      Do you people realize that the freedoms you hold dear directly spring from Christianity, and as we get less Christian, tyranny increases. The Jews are targeting the Church as their final prize. They target White people because they are largely Christians, in their actions and thinking, if not in actual fact.

      This stuff is not hard to figure out, but I’m amazed at the hypocrisy of wanting to reestablish the White people’s destiny and then completely ignoring how Christianity has and will continue to play an important (decisive?) role. Are you trying to build a movement or destroy it?

      I have to think that people who continually attack Christianity are really doing the Jews’ work.

    5. Tom McReen Says:

      Jews are insane and I’m not just saying that because they are our enemies. VNNers have posted the textbook descriptions of psychopaths in the past and they fit jews exactly.

    6. Parsifal Says:

      Jews are very scatological. I’ve read some stuff by Philip Roth, Abbie Hoffman, Allen Ginsburg, Al Goldstein, Freud……..They’re completely obsessed with everything related to pee-pee and poo-poo.

    7. Ein Says:

      Parsifal Says: “Jews are very scatological. I’ve …They’re completely obsessed with everything related to pee-pee and poo-poo.”

    8. Ein Says:

      Parsifal Says: “Jews are very scatological. I’ve …They’re completely obsessed with everything related to pee-pee and poo-poo.”

    9. Ein Says:

      Parsifal Says: “Jews are very scatological. I’ve …They’re completely obsessed with everything related to pee-pee and poo-poo.”

    10. Ein Says:

      I wasn’t posting ANYTHING! Suddenly it started going nuts.

    11. Ein Says:

      I was about to say (but not so soon!) that I had a look at “Judicial” last night (the first time in quite a while) and it seems that Philip Roth is their new hero, and they are now firmly in the anti-nazi camp because of those wicked fiends’ persecution of the poor, harmless Jewish people.

      Well, well. So now they are champions of the Jews? Not so long ago it was the reverse! There was always something strange and very fishy-smelling about that site. Rotten fish, I mean. I think many people were suspicious of it. I long ago realized that whoever is running it has to be either a moron or a psychopath or a troll. Take your pick.

    12. shabbos s shabazz Says:

      A famous book, in and out of print since 1948:

      ~An Attempt to Clarify Some Issues About the
      So-Called Psychopathic Personality
      Non teneas aururn totum quod splendet ut aururn.
      Hervey Cleckley, M.D.
      Clinical Professor of Psychiatry,
      Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga.;
      author of The Caricature of Love
      and of The Three Faces of Eve
      (with Corbett H. Thigpen)


    13. gw Says:

      Yes, I see that Judicial is attacking that evil antisemite, Lindbergh —

    14. shabbos s shabazz Says:


      Read further:

      “Exploring The World If Lindbergh Was President In 1940

      A brief look at how the world would be if Charles Lindbergh had been president. Zionist knew the timing was critical, that Lindberg, like John Kennedy Jr, would derail their years of planning. Henry Ford saw Lindbergh as the President in 1940, and the America First party was ready.”

      “. . .would derail their years of planning. . .”


    15. Parsifal Says:

      I’ll wager that at this very moment, there is some privileged young WASP race-traitor or crypto-Jew punk from a wealthy Eastern family who is currently a sophmore at Yale or Harvard and is being groomed by his powerful Jew handlers to be the President in another 25 to 30 years.

    16. Ein Says:

      Parsifal said; “some crypto-Jew punk from a wealthy Eastern family who is currently a sophmore at Yale or Harvard and is being groomed by his powerful Jew handlers to be the President in another 25 to 30 years.”

      Absolutely! They plan well ahead. And they hedge their bets.

      I read an article, it was on the subject of vacations, in which Sarkozy’s best friend casually disclosed that in the 80s, when they were just out of school, they were selected for some program (something like “Rising Young Stars in Politics”, or something such) to be taken to the USA and spend the entire summer touring around the country and meeting influential people, all expenses paid. Just two young guys having a great time, enjoying all the best America had to offer. He said it was the best vacation he/they ever had. I’ll bet it was! A future president of France had already been selected by The Powers That Be.

      In the same way, Obama began being groomed many years ago, when the Jews first “discovered” him. He didn’t pop up from out of nowhere (although the public never heard of him). He was in the pipeline for a long time, getting preped and readied by his handlers.

    17. Ein Says:

      I want to stress that the article was about vacations, not politics, and not about Sarkozy. This little eye-popping morsel of information just slipped through.

      In the same way, I once saw Rose Kennedy being interviewed on TV, shortly before she died. She very casually dropped the comment that when they were living in London (and her husband was ambassador to Britain), the young JFK as a teenager went to Moscow on a study trip with Professor Lasky! (the crypto-communist Jew who was the architect of Britains’ demise). She was a doddering old woman then, and she said it so innocently I don’t think she had the slightest idea of the significance of her revelation. My jaw dropped. She wasn’t very politically savvy, despite surrounded by politics. That is, she was strictly a political wife, concerned with who was who, who was richest, who was getting divorced, where to seat which one at the table, etc., but she was totally naive about the fundamental ideologies that shaped our world. She reminded me of a Mafia wife who is restricted to social matters but is kept in the dark about the nature of the family “business”.

    18. Howdy Doody Says: