14 June, 2009

Comments on Takuan Seiyo’s Screed

Posted by Socrates in jewed culture, jewed politics, Kevin MacDonald, Socrates at 11:54 pm | Permanent Link

by Dr. Kevin MacDonald.

“It seems that lately most of my critics have been Jews associated with the paleoconservative right: Paul Gottfried, Robert Weissberg (see my reply after Weissberg’s comment), and Lawrence Auster. Takuan Seiyo’s critique rehashes familiar arguments in a particularly nasty way, speaking, for example, of my ‘malice and brain-dead stupidity.'”

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 07/12/09 Joe McCarthy and the Jews: Comments on Jewish Organizations’ Response to Communism and Senator McCarthy, by Aviva Weingarten (2008) 27% similar
  3. 03/08/09 ‘Comments’ Posting 26% similar
  4. 10/17/07 Scientist’s Comments on Race/Intelligence Criticized 26% similar
  5. 10/09/09 Elie Mystal’s Lament: Politically Incorrect Comments on Above the Law 25% similar
  6. 03/29/09 Comments on ‘Memories of Madison': White Ethno-Nationalism and Zionism 25% similar
  7. 3 Responses to “Comments on Takuan Seiyo’s Screed”

    1. Parsifal Says:

      I like how the Jews have taken it upon themselves to decide for us what are acceptable forms of free speech and what are not.

    2. Diamed Says:

      For a less polite debunking of Seiyo’s Screed, I offer my own response:

      http://diamed-the-road-less-traveled.blogspot.com/2009/06/gates-of-vienna-skating-dangerously.html

    3. Adam Says:

      Diamed Says:

      For a less polite debunking of Seiyo’s Screed, I offer my own response:

      http://diamed-the-road-less-traveled.blogspot.com/2009/06/gates-of-vienna-skating-dangerously.html

      A most excellent response, Diamed. For my part, I found it difficult to take this bizarrely-named Jew’s attack on MacDonald in the least seriously when he admitted, about halfway through, that he actually hadn’t even read The Culture of Critique, let alone any of MacDonald’s other books. Nor, evidently, have most of the other buffoons who commented on his screed. It was all the blind leading the blind: nincompoops who knew not whereof they spoke.

      I think there are valid criticisms that may be made of MacDonald’s work, but these Jews and their sympathizers haven’t put them forward. Takuan Seiyo’s piece amounts a variation on the “context” theme of anti-anti-Semitic apologias. As you observe so well, he discards all scientific explanations of Jewish malefaction as crazy, anti-Semitic ravings without bothering to refute them. “Vee must put ze crimes of da Jewish pipple in context, meshugga! Zen we can see dat it is really all de fault of de ebil goyim!”

      It’s getting old, Jews, and aged bullshit is still … bullshit. You need to work on your shtick. Write some new material!