12 August, 2009

Feces, Fetuses, Etc.

Posted by Socrates in Socrates, William Pierce at 3:05 am | Permanent Link

by Dr. William Pierce.

“Let me begin by responding to a few listeners who had trouble believing the bizarre things I reported three weeks ago, when I wanted to illustrate the fact that there are profound psychological differences separating the various human races, and these differences have evolutionary origins: which is to say that they are inborn, genetically determined differences that were established over a long period of time during the evolution of the various races in various parts of the world, where there were differing evolutionary environments.”

The rest is [Here]. (No online audio version available).


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 11/02/11 Feces, Fetuses, Etc. 100% similar
  3. 08/03/11 About E=MC², Etc. 33% similar
  4. 02/27/12 Invaders, Insurgents, Etc. 33% similar
  5. 08/16/13 Equality: Man’s Most Dangerous Myth 31% similar
  6. 07/11/15 To Be a White “Racist” is to Have Higher Standards Than Other Whites 26% similar
  7. 24 Responses to “Feces, Fetuses, Etc.”

    1. Parsifal Says:

      How can anyone seriously believe the Jews’ anthropology propaganda that says all the different races of people in the world today are descended from a small group of short, swarthy, naked, wooly-headed aboriginals who walked out of Africa 100,000 years ago? Not even the Jews themselves believe that bullshit. But they expect everyone else to believe it. There hasn’t been any real or objective scientific study of human racial evolution for over 50 years.

    2. exalted grand-master oberführer double diamond jim! Says:

      so-called “neo-Darwinism” has much to answer for…..although the likes of Richard Dawkins continually berate “fundies” of various flavours, it’ll be a cold day in HELL before they’d “cut loose” on the kike…..if xtianity is absurd then, surely, “Holocaustianity” must be even more so!

      to even suggest that Aryans share “a common ancestor” with mud people is, at worst, obscene and, at best, ludicrous!

      the “out of Afreaka” theory of human origins has, as “Parisfal” notes, “sprung up” in the last fifty years or so; coincidentally, about the same time that the kikez have had total control of the academy!

      caucausian-type people are, clearly, physically, morally, intellectually and, dare one say it, spiritually, light years removed from the likes of niggaz & jewz!

      we share NO, repeat NO! “common ancestry” with such sub-humanoids!

    3. Diamed Says:

      By God! Fucking cannibals! I’ve never been so disgusted with Chinese, all the slaughters of Mao are nothing to this barbarism.

      Torturing dogs before killing them and listening to their squeals as an appetizer for dinner?

      Eating hundreds of dead babies because it helps clear up their asthma?

      Do they have no shame? No compassion? Anything but a giant black hole in their hearts?

      And even though I’m sure a small minority of Chinese actually do these satanic acts, the rest endorse it and allow it, by not passing a law against it and lining these people up against a wall! Society has a responsibility to protect certain lines we do not cross — There’s no excuse for any of them.

    4. exalted grand-master oberführer double diamond jim! Says:

      can we exist on the same planet as non-whites?

      problematic, to say the least!

    5. Parsifal Says:

      I hate to say this, but fashion-conscious young White women contribute to the problem of Chink animal cruelty when they buy those short, cheap-looking fur-trimmed jackets at Wal-Mart and Target. Don’t they realize that fur was literally torn off the bodies of cats and dogs who were still alive? If the Chinks want to eat their own aborted Chink fetuses, that’s OK with me, because the best Chinks are the ones who were aborted. But cruelty to cats and dogs? That’s NEVER acceptable.

      In a sane world, us Whites would have as little to do as possible with the savage Yellow races. Nothing good ever really came out of the Orient, yet White and Jew businessmen are always slobbering at the prospect of doing lots of business with Asia.

    6. Adam Says:

      Parsifal Says:

      How can anyone seriously believe the Jews’ anthropology propaganda that says all the different races of people in the world today are descended from a small group of short, swarthy, naked, wooly-headed aboriginals who walked out of Africa 100,000 years ago? Not even the Jews themselves believe that bullshit. But they expect everyone else to believe it.

      It’s not the Jews’ anthropology, but Darwin’s theory, which posits a common ancestry between the races. So you don’t believe in Darwin’s theory? What’s the alternative? We already know you’re not a Christian.

      There hasn’t been any real or objective scientific study of human racial evolution for over 50 years.

      Since, following the discovery of DNA’s double helix in 1953, there has been a great deal of study of genomic differences between various human races, I think this is a bit of an exaggeration, to put it mildly. Still, I would agree that Jewish censorship and misdirection has tremendously inhibited research in this area.

      Of the four well-known names who did the most to shape thought in the 20th century – Einstein, Marx, Darwin, and Freud – only Darwin is our own. No doubt the Jews would like us to reject him, but I think we should pay homage to his theory. It’s a brilliant insight that explains a lot about what we see in this world, including the behavioral differences between Jews and whites, as described by Dr. Pierce, above. It also explains why their genetic interests and our genetic interests are necessarily irreconcilable, and why there must be neverending war between us, until the death of either the Jewish race or our own.

    7. Adam Says:

      Diamed Says:

      By God! Fucking cannibals! I’ve never been so disgusted with Chinese, all the slaughters of Mao are nothing to this barbarism.

      One of the most noteworthy differences between the white race and ALL of the non-white races is cannibalism. Although examples of cannibalism among starving people or among criminal psychopaths can be cited from all races, whites have not practiced cannibalism as a culturally-approved practice in all of recorded history. Even the Romans, who were not at all squeamish when it came to torturing people or taking life, drew the line at cannibalism. But in all non-white races, a culture of cannibalism not only has existed within historical memory, but in many non-white races it even persists to this day, in one form or another, as a culturally-approved practice. Cassius Dio, for example, makes note of Jewish cannibalism of whites in a revolt on the island of Cyprus during Roman times. In Africa of today, cannibalism is often adopted as a battle tactic in fights between rival nigger tribes. The cannibalism of the Aztec and other New World aboriginals is well-documented, and still can be found today among certain tribes in the Amazon. The Polynesians have only recently given up their fondness for “long pig”, as they call human flesh, and Dr. Pierce, above, gives us the run down on the yellow man’s fondness for human flesh.

      Truly, our white race is unique in this evil world.

    8. Blackshirt Says:

      I remember when this story first came out and I heard it on ADV (I used to listen religiously). Not to discredit someone who I hold in the highest of esteem (Dr. Pierce) but I have read sometime ago that this was a hoax. I’ll have to do some more research, but I’m pretty sure of that from what I can remember at the time.

      One of the things I have learned over the years involved in the White struggle, is that it is good to be skeptical about stuff like this. When you are racially aware it is easy to believe the most evil of stories you hear about other races. Not to say that some of the things you hear aren’t true, but until things are proven without a doubt healthy skepticism doesn’t hurt, and it often saves yourself some embarrassment if you fall for a hoax.

      Adam, you make some good points. I’m with you on Darwin… I believe in evolution and natural law. I personally don’t reject the theory that all humanoids originated in Africa. With that said, there is nothing wrong with that when you add that it is possible that we Whites are the most evolved of humanoids. Sure, I can accept the fact that other races are related to us, but we Whites are the most evolved and advanced of our species. Makes perfect sense, and up until the 20th century the White Race proved that we were the fittest.

    9. Stronza Says:

      We have a bit of barbarity in our own history, don’t you think? What about burning people at the stake for following the wrong religion?

      Hey, who took care of William Wallace? Chink immigrants?

      What about restraining countless animals and dropping toilet cleaning chemicals into their eyes while they struggle, go blind, & then slowly die? Betcha some negro from the ghetto thought that one up.

      We whites never had a habit of consuming human flesh? Wow, what an accomplishment.

      Cats & dogs have their fur stripped while they are still alive, compliments of chinkies? How about those noble Newfie seal hunters doing the same thing to the whitecoat seals pups, but now they brag they don’t do that anymore. It was the much-hated animal rights folks who put a stop to this purported traditional practice.

      What debased, deranged beings thought of these tortures and many, many others? Oh, I know – yellows & blacks.

      I recall someone on the forum saying he wouldn’t give you 10 cents for the vast majority of white people. Neither would I.

    10. Adam Says:

      Stronza Says:

      We whites never had a habit of consuming human flesh? Wow, what an accomplishment.

      Developing a culture of cannibalism (or not) is important because that is something that could be used to delineate races. It has taxonomic significance.

      That isn’t true for all of the other many and varied tortures or the abuses of animals you mention. They are found everywhere, in all times and places, among all people.

      I recall someone on the forum saying he wouldn’t give you 10 cents for the vast majority of white people. Neither would I.

      Then you aren’t a white racist. More of a misanthope, I’d say .

    11. Truthteller Says:

      Good documentary on Podblanc.com with Dr. Pierce in two parts called “Dr.No”. Worth a watch!

    12. Adam Says:

      Dr. Oliver, in What We Owe Our Parasites, attempts a complete list of things that differentiate the white race from non-white races. He’s in fine form in that essay. Here’s one of the best passages:

      The fourth is our capacity for compassion. We have a racial reluctance to inflict unnecessary pain, and we are ourselves distressed by the sight of suffering. That is, of course, a peculiarity that brings upon us the ridicule and contempt of the numerical majority of the world’s population, who are beings differently constituted. The savages of Africa, who are now your masters in the sense that you have to work for them every day, find the spectacle of a human being under torture simply hilarious. And when they see a blinded captive with broken limbs squirm as they prod him with red-hot irons, they laugh with glee — with a merriment, a real merriment, that is greater than the funniest farce on the stage has ever excited in you. You may search the vast and respectable literature of China in vain for any trace of compassion for suffering per se.

      There is at least one more thing that sets white people apart from the other races, in addition to not being cannibals. That is the sort of self-recriminating moral fervor that Stronza displays, above. Non-whites never show anything of the kind. Dr. MacDonald has had quite a bit to say about it, under the heading of what he calls “white guilt”, but as far as I know he has never suggested it is useful as a distinguishing characteristic of the white race; that it is of taxonomic significance. But it would appear to be so.

    13. Stronza Says:

      Why would any WN point fingers at nonwhites committing atrocities when there is no shortage of whites doing the same thing?

      You’re lucky you’ve got me and my self-recriminating moral fervor to point out the obvious. I don’t feel the least bit “guilty” about the misdeeds of my own kind. That nonwhites never display any guilt about the sick-in-the-head behavior of their own people is irrelevant. You want us to act like psychopaths, too?

    14. Adam Says:

      Stronza Says:

      Why would any WN point fingers at nonwhites committing atrocities when there is no shortage of whites doing the same thing?

      Really? There are white guys carjacking nigger couples and raping them BOTH and then sadistically murdering them, mutilating their bodies and setting them on fire, like those niggers did to that young white couple in Knoxville a couple of years ago? Or maybe you mean there are white people in cults like the nigger cult in the “Zebra murders”, that go looking for niggers to kidnap, sadistically torture, murder, and dismember, and that have killed a large number of such niggers?

      I musta missed those reports.

      You’re lucky you’ve got me and my self-recriminating moral fervor to point out the obvious.

      Luck doesn’t figure in. This sort of thing is appallingly common among whites. Any forum or chat room in which a “racist” post is made will elicit this response.

      I don’t feel the least bit “guilty” about the misdeeds of my own kind.

      That’s what I keep saying. I think “guilt” is the wrong word. It’s a conditioned response that the people suffering from it often describe as “guilt”, because it apparently feels similar to bona fide guilt, but it’s not really guilt at all. Dr. MacDonald sometimes refers to the same behavior when directed at an external target as “altruistic punishment”. Maybe that’s a better phrase. It’s a type of altruistic punishment, which in your case you are directing at the entire white race.

      That nonwhites never display any guilt about the sick-in-the-head behavior of their own people is irrelevant.

      No, it’s entirely relevant to my point about racial characteristics, and I explained why. Apparently only white people have the requisite objectivity, the mental development, to reproach their own race on account of failure to live up to what they would like to imagine are universal standards.

      You want us to act like psychopaths, too?

      It’s a mad world, isn’t it?

    15. Parsifal Says:

      Herr Stronza is correct, us Whites have committed more than our fair share of atrocities against our own kind and against Nature. And Herr Adam is correct when he points out that only Whites have the capacity for feelings of compassion and remorse.

      However, I am no longer the least bit interested in feeling remorse for any atrocities our Race may have committed against those of other, inferior races. Whatever injustices we may have inflicted on them pale in comparison to what they’ve done to their own kind and to us.

    16. Stronza Says:

      Parsifal, I would suggest that we have normal feelings of compassion & remorse for non-whites only because such attitudes have been pushed down our throat.

      Stronza ain’t a “herr”. She is a nice, feminine lady (sort of).

    17. Parsifal Says:

      Oops, sorry about the gender thing, Ma’am. You’re right about those feelings of compassion and remorse for alien races being forced upon us. The Jew knows our weaknesses and how to manipulate them to his advantage.

    18. CW-2 Says:

      Why do you think globalist jews are building China into an industrial colossus? So we can buy cat fur lined shoes cheaply in Walmart? Hardly, their real aim is to use China to crush what will be left of White America post 2040, and start a Pol Pot Cambodian style reign of genocidal terror. Australia will be used a test area first.

    19. Stronza Says:

      So after what is left of White America is crushed, where will they run & what will they do?

    20. Parsifal Says:

      That’s right, Ms. Stronza, Jews are parasites, so how could they survive if they kill off their biggest, fattest host, if that’s their plan? Are there too many commas in that sentence?

    21. CW-2 Says:

      Well, jews will then have achieved their 3000 year long dream of destroying the white race while their allies of convenience, the globalists, will gleefully look on the carnage as a necessary price for the triumph of global ‘brown man.’

      An over-simplification to be sure, but as far back as 1978 Alexander Solzhenitsyn was looking to the future and could discern a pattern developing. Here is what he said:

      “Some Western voices already have spoken of the need of a protective screen against hostile forces in the next world conflict; in this case , the shield would be China. But I would not wish such an outcome to any country in the world. First of all it is again a doomed alliance with evil; it would grant the United States a brief respite, but when at a later date China with its billion people would turn around armed with American weapons, America itself would fall victim to a Cambodian-style genocide.”

    22. CW-2 Says:

      Parasites eventually always kill the host organism, just like Aesop’s fable of the frog and the scorpion.

    23. Parsifal Says:

      I knew you would say that, but one would think Jews were a little smarter than tapeworms.

    24. Stronza Says:

      The Scorpion and the Frog

      A scorpion and a frog meet on the bank of a stream and the
      scorpion asks the frog to carry him across on its back. The
      frog asks, “How do I know you won’t sting me?” The scorpion
      says, “Because if I do, I will die too.”

      The frog is satisfied, and they set out, but in midstream,
      the scorpion stings the frog. The frog feels the onset of
      paralysis and starts to sink, knowing they both will drown,
      but has just enough time to gasp “Why?”

      Replies the scorpion: “It’s my nature…”