25 September, 2009

“Free” Trade: Just Another Type of Internationalism

Posted by Socrates in Big Business, business, capitalism, free trade, globalization, international Jewry, Jew World Order, Marx, New World Order, Socrates at 3:43 pm | Permanent Link

Yeah, ok, Buchanan isn’t one of us; however, this provides a handy excuse to mention free trade: it’s free to erase your job, free to wreck your culture, and it has Jewish roots [1]:

[Article].

[1] Karl Marx himself favored free trade:
“In a word, the free trade system hastens the social revolution. It is in this revolutionary sense alone, gentlemen, that I vote in favor of free trade”


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 11/20/13 “Free Trade” Threatens Our Future 45% similar
  3. 09/12/11 Free Trade: Bad For Whites, Good For Non-Whites And Corporate CEOs 40% similar
  4. 08/07/18 The Sick Cult of Free Trade, or, Trading Away Our Jobs, Our Culture and Our Sovereignty 39% similar
  5. 03/28/08 A Different Type of Money System: Social Credit 39% similar
  6. 01/31/15 TPP: the Latest Free Trade Agreement, or, More White Help for the Third World 39% similar
  7. 16 Responses to ““Free” Trade: Just Another Type of Internationalism”

    1. Tim McGreen Says:

      The Jews and the Internationalists have brainwashed the American public so extensively that the idea of “protectionism”, ie, the practice of a country protecting its jobs, its industries and its economy from cut-throat foreign competition, is regarded as a bad thing. There’s nothing free about “free trade”. It’s costing us jobs and our economic sovereignty. Death to the anti-White, Jew-controlled Press for promoting this nation-killing poison.

    2. abc Says:

      Isn’t Buchanan pro-white?

    3. Spaceman Says:

      Buchanan is pro-green. Not in the environmental-conservation sense, but the money sense. Yes, at heart he seems to have pro-White sentiment, but Pat has made a very nice career for himself keeping one foot planted squarely in the system. He has functioned nicely as an “angry White male” safety valve for the ZOG establishment. Sure, he has more guts than Limbaugh, Hannity, O’Reilly, Beck ,etc. But I think the media keeps him around because he has “tenure” like a university professor. Pat is getting older now, he is in his 70s. Maybe in a few years when he is in the twilight of his career/life he will finally “let it all hang out” and actually NAME THE JEW as the source of our destruction. Until then he will just be a pied piper that leads people up the hill, but never to the very top.

    4. Tim McGreen Says:

      Very well said, Spaceman. Buchanan is the System’s token Angry White Male and he’s made a darn good living for himself playing that role. But if anything, as he gets older he will most likely mellow out, like George Wallace, Barry Goldwater and Ezra Pound did.

    5. Tom Collins Says:

      I posted this on the article. Probably will be deleted. I post a lot of stuff like this especially on Sunday nights as monitors are slow or absent to delete and when your average joe reads the morning news before he is off to work on Mon. morning he sees an angry racial argument over my comment (even when it is deleted)

      “The Albany factory is subject to … civil rights laws.”
      Pat Buchanan touched the primary reason why Americans lose and will continue to lose jobs to the Chinese. American companies here are required to employ useless and parasitic Negroes and women
      White men angered at the shiftless and troublesome Negroes and women become less productive unnecessarily increasing the cost to produce a new set of treads.

    6. old dutch Says:

      Joe Lieberman’s Shabbos Goy still has clout:

      WASHINGTON — A tiny car company backed by former Vice President Al Gore has just gotten a $529 million U.S. government loan to help build a hybrid sports car in Finland that will sell for about $89,000.

      The award this week to California startup Fisker Automotive Inc. follows a $465 million government loan to Tesla Motors Inc., purveyors of a $109,000 British-built electric Roadster. Tesla is a California startup focusing on all-electric vehicles, with a number of celebrity endorsements that is backed by investors that have contributed to Democratic campaigns.

      http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125383160812639013.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLTopStories

    7. Krystian Kowalczyk Says:

      OMG, did McReen actually stop trolling the front page? I stopped reading it in March/April because he was stinking the place up so badly. I might have to comment regularly again.

    8. Krystian Kowalczyk Says:

      Very well said, Spaceman. Buchanan is the System’s token Angry White Male and he’s made a darn good living for himself playing that role.

      I agree, although I think he can and does attract people to “soft racism”. Take me, for example. I used to be a Takimag reader and paleocon but slowly I came around to open pro-white politics after noticing things like: a.) no criticism of Jews is allowed in paleocon circles, b.) there is a limit to how “un-PC” you can talk in paleocon circles, c.) I never agreed with the ideal of a “colorblind society” like idiot Zmirak and friends talk about, etc.

      Paleocons can help get people to a place where they can take our ideas seriously. I think our outreach has even stolen some of their base in recent years.

    9. Krystian Kowalczyk Says:

      The Jews and the Internationalists have brainwashed the American public so extensively that the idea of “protectionism”, ie, the practice of a country protecting its jobs, its industries and its economy from cut-throat foreign competition, is regarded as a bad thing.

      Yet it is a simple matter to point out that the times when America was most productive were the times when it had domestic peace combined with protected industry and extremely tight immigration policy (i.e. 1920s, 1950s). We all know the only people who benefit from this situation are the economic overlords and we become their chattel.

    10. Blackshirt Says:

      Krystian Kowalczyk Says:

      “OMG, did McReen actually stop trolling the front page? I stopped reading it in March/April because he was stinking the place up so badly. I might have to comment regularly again.”

      He’s (or the team in Tel Aviv mascarading as Irishmen) still lurking here and he shows his ugly conservative head on occasion. Sometimes he posts under “Curt O’brian” and “banjo billy”.

    11. Irma Grese Says:

      Yet it is a simple matter to point out that the times when America was most productive were the times when it had domestic peace combined with protected industry and extremely tight immigration policy (i.e. 1920s, 1950s).

      Yes indeed! This is why I don’t understand why Linder is so into Randian lasissez faire economics. All it does is undermine White racial interests! Even if we had the revolution TOMORROW and booted every last mud/kike out of the country, within a few years we’d have corporate lobbyists pushing to bring them back in the name of “cheap labor” and “competition.” Can’t have poor and working class Whites getting paid a living wage, you know – why, the peasants might start putting on airs!

      No, free-market capitalism is the bane of Whites. Not that Marxism is any answer of course – the mountain of corpses that was the jewSSR put paid to THAT nonsense – but there has GOT to be another way.

    12. 2050 Says:

      Irma said:

      No, free-market capitalism is the bane of Whites. Not that Marxism is any answer of course – the mountain of corpses that was the jewSSR put paid to THAT nonsense – but there has GOT to be another way.

      True.
      Free Enterprise maybe. I grow or make something and sell it to you with zero intrusion from the government. Maybe only to keep people/companies from ripping you off.
      (In my world, advertising would be illegal, but maybe in a non-jewed world the commercials wouldn’t be so…)

      Jews did such a good job making ‘capitalism’ the only alternative to communism/Marxism/socialism; and making capitalism the domain of ‘conservatives’/Republicons that those turned off by corporate greed etc, naturally turn to the left. Then they end up embracing jew/Marxist goals and ideals, such as womens lib. The whole equal rights movement was jewish from Marx to Gloria Steinem. But when you grow up with jew indoctrination from birth, it’s hard not to believe the anti-white propaganda that said that before women were chattel, and treated badly. Aryan people have always, except for crude and uncouth exceptions, treated their women with great respect, though being realistic about duties and roles. Any movement toward the women working, and being soldiers etc. plays right into the jews hands.

      Off topic, forgive me Socrates but I want to address the comments above.
      I also was disgusted by the infighting and so-called trolling. But in my view Parsifal and Blackshirt and some others were as bad or probably much worse than McReen was. Now, before you start typing, let me say that I like all of you guys. And all you girls.
      I do not think that Tom McReen and Curt OBrien are the same person. I don’t really recall Banjo billy but it seems that he was a different kind of poster.
      I think that T M was ganged up on by a very vocal group of left leaning commentators here. So he had to attack more folks in return, to ‘get even’ or whatever.
      The left always gang attacks. Go on any mainstream or left leaning (that’s redundant, I know) website that allows comments, and make a comment on a pro-white issue or even just a ‘conservative’ issue. You will be dogpiled.
      The occasional right leaning conservative will come to their defense, but not many. Here, it’s C. O. who comes occasionally to T. M.’s defense when the left attacks.
      From the other perspective, i don’t think Parsifal and Blackshirt are the same, like T. M. accused them. However you do share similar views on traditional leftist ideologies, such as women’s lib (I know it’s an old term) and being anti-capitalist. The tendency to go along with the voice that is loudest and most numerous is strong. There seems to be a movement to the left in this White nationalist website’s front pages. I don’t hang out in the forums so maybe that’s different. I think that movement to the left is dangerous.
      Dangerous because it’s a total jew invention.
      I know the ‘right’ is a jew tool too, but only because the jew controls so much. What started out to fight a jew invention to destroy white people(communism), became a tool of the same jews to destroy white people. I think that not attacking communism as an explicitly jew made thing was a mistake and cost the right the high ground. It allowed jew ‘anti-communists’ like Kissinger to dictate our fight.

      The right is not the answer.
      The left is not the answer.
      To move to left is to move to the jew Marx.
      To move to the right, is only to the jews benefit when you do it on their terms. If you move to the ‘far right’ and I’m not taking about Limbaugh, hannity, and Bush/Republicans, then you land in White Nationalist territory. That’s why the left screams Far Right Extremist at every slight movement to the right or any slight movement to the ‘original intent’ of the Constitution or 2nd Amendment guys or any sign of white racial explicitness, or even at implicit whiteness, big government, or any number of other issues.

      That screaming keeps others that would raise up and join them to shy away and maybe even to slowly change to suit the screamers.

      That’s why it bothers me to see a ‘conservative’ leaning poster maligned because it’s just the treatment that person would get in the mainstream or green/marxist/pinko/liberal/Democrat et al websites and media.

      TM thought it was a group organized to sway the movement away from the right. I don’t think so.
      Blackshirt thinks the same about TM and sympathizers. I don’t think so.
      I hope anyway.

      Saw a site the other day, that allows no white infighting. Sounds good, sometime, I’ll check them out. But I like it here. I like the ideas that folks contribute to the discussion. Linder and Pierce are good anchors to look to if some ideas are going astray.

      I like Tom and Blackshirt and all the rest here, i’m used to reading all of the ideas and even the ones I don’t agree with, and I hate to see you guys bashing each other. It’s been so much better here lately.
      ———————
      I want to leave this with a quote from Gen. McChrystal(sp?) the commander in the ongoing war in Iraq and Afghanistan. It’s about fighting the ‘Insurgency.’

      ————————–

      COMISAF Initial Assessment (Unclassified) —

      Monday, September 21, 2009; 12:30 AM

      The Department of Defense on Sunday evening released a declassified version of Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal’s assessment of the war in Afghanistan.

      Insurgent Vulnerabilities. The insurgents have important and exploitable shortcomings; they are not invulnerable. Command and control frictions and divergent goals hamper insurgent planning and restrict coordination of operations …. REDACTION … Insurgent excesses can alienate the people. Moreover, the core elements of the insurgency have previously held power in Afghanistan and failed. Popular enthusiasm for them appears limited, as does their ability to spread viably beyond Pashtun areas. GIRoA and ISAF have an opportunity to exploit the insurgent’s inability to mobilize public support.

      This is the crux of the WN problem:
      We have to understand that much division is sown by our enemies.
      Command and control frictions and divergent goals hamper insurgent planning and restrict coordination of operations …. REDACTION … Insurgent excesses can alienate the people.

      That last part probably refers to getting an insurgent group to be viewed as profiting from the people’s plight or bombing the local market in the name of the group.

      The part in bold is what’s shown on these pages in it’s pre para-military insurgent form by the infighting.

      I hope we get it right when it happens, or they’ll have us fighting each other over ‘divergent goals’ or ‘command and control frictions’.

    13. -jc Says:

      Leftist Capitalism
      Posted 07:04 PM ET
      Investor’s Business Daily

      Hypocrisy: Apart from a healthy appetite, what do the 1.3-billion-strong Red Chinese have in common with filmmaker Michael Moore? Living a Marxist creed while practicing capitalism.

      The paradox of New York City, home to Wall Street, arranging for the Empire State Building to shimmer in the red and yellow of the communist Chinese flag to celebrate 60 years of tyranny is bad enough.

      What about a documentary filmmaker who has lined his pockets with millions by tearing down a corporate CEO, celebrating Fidel Castro’s Cuba and now directly savaging America’s free-market system in his latest flick, “Capitalism: A Love Story”?

      Mainland China may have long since toned down its state-sanctioned cult of personality surrounding the greatest murderer in world history, Mao Zedong. But as far as political freedoms go, it remains very much a communist country.

      Its adoption of capitalist economics, however, has turned it into an economic powerhouse, though you’ll never hear its safely entrenched dictators admit as much.

      By the same token, you’ll never see Michael Moore doff his ever-present baseball cap to the economic freedom that brought him a fortune. “Capitalism did nothing for me,” he claimed as he entered the movie house in Washington, D.C., where his film premiered Tuesday night.

      Moore was asked about amassing “a fortune of over $50 million,” thanks to filmgoers shelling out cash to capitalist theater chains and capitalist DVD stores in capitalist countries.

      He complained of having to “pretty much beg, borrow and steal,” that “the system is not set up to help somebody from the working class make a movie like this and get the truth out there,” and that Disney “tried to kill” his highest-grossing movie, “Fahrenheit 9/11,” for which he reportedly got $21 million.

      Moore’s health care documentary, “Sicko” — for which he took half the profit, according to Vanity Fair — ends with Americans arriving in communist Cuba, where they finally get the care they desperately need.

      If you think that story rings true, just give it a try sometime.

      Moore first came to notice in 1989 for “Roger and Me,” in which he lambasted General Motors CEO Roger Smith. Fortune magazine estimates his films have grossed more than $300 million.

      A common thread runs through such self-serving hypocrisy. For Beijing to admit that freedom is the key to China’s success would threaten its rulers’ permanent power.

      For Michael Moore to admit he’s the beneficiary of capitalism would expose his slickly produced propaganda as just hot air.

    14. 2050 Says:

      capitalism = freedom?? Ha!! Another jew lie

    15. Tom McReen Says:

      “Krystian Kowalczyk Says:

      OMG, did McReen actually stop trolling the front page? I stopped reading it in March/April because he was stinking the place up so badly. I might have to comment regularly again.”

      Definition of trolling: being banned from the forum and repeating phrases (‘stinking up the place’) to cause unprovoked disruption on a front page topic. How many accounts do you need, Jahn?

      He’s (or the team in Tel Aviv mascarading as Irishmen) still lurking here and he shows his ugly conservative head on occasion. Sometimes he posts under “Curt O’brian” and “banjo billy”.”

      See, this is one reason why I stick around – our ever-present gang of jew/anti-trolls rewriting history and telling lies (‘conservative/posts as Curt or Banjo Billy’) to mislead newbs.

      He knows he’s lying too, he posts these things to stir shit and get a response. That’s called trolling. Constantly accusing me of doing what he does (TJB).

      So, free trade. I’ve wondered what the response would be from Conservatards if they realise they had been duped into supporting Marxism by the Limbaugh talk radio mob.

      That also means Mike ‘McGreen’ Jahn and ‘Blackshirt’ are totally wrong – if Conservatives support Marxist ideas then they are marxists too; also the zionists are ‘ex’ bolsheviks. So where does ‘right-wing’ come into it then, our resident 60’s rock music and Hollywood-loving lefties?

    16. DB Edwatds Says:

      “FREE TRADE.” This is the reason why we in America have no more manufacturing. Go to the store. All items are marked MADE IN CHINA. They are cheaply made and cheaply sold. Foreign goods have cost the jobs of American wage earners in the most insidious manner. Americans can produe superior quality goods if given the chance. But FREE TRADE has created a slippery slope, an uneven playinf field that has destroyed the American economy.

      How about allowing Americans to earn a living and support their families? PULL THE PLUG ON FOREIGN TERMITES.