Vanguard News Network

Yes. @ university I remember how it was explicitly stated from certain professors, as a matter of course, that emphasis was now to be shifted from oldfashioned “eurocentric” to updated “globalist”. This agenda, was approvingly welcomed with saintly, tolerant smiles from the well-conditioned alumni, without objections.
…University textbooks today are pure poison. I remember reading a chapter on the “hollow-co$t” in a world history textbook from around 2004 (with a slant-eyed mongoloid emperor on the cover).
…It was completely laden with sentimental catchwords such as “systematic mass murder”; “extermination” and obviously the sacred SIX [N]ILLION. It was like reading a brochure from the Auschwitz museum from before the Berlin Wall fell.

“I’ve seen a few recent examples of high school “history” textbooks and it’s all Harriet Tubman, Malcolm X, Anne Frank, Maya Angelou, Ellie Wiesel”

Disgusting. I’d be very curious to see some examples of today’s schoolbooks/propaganda texts. I wonder where I could get hold of one.

The Red Skull Says:

A people without a past and proper appreciation of that past,are a people without a future.This is the goal of books like these-to erase any racial pride that Whites might have from their past racial and cultural achievements.Marx would be Proud.

O’Brien was looking down at him speculatively. More than ever he had the air of a teacher taking pains with a wayward but promising child.

‘There is a Party slogan dealing with the control of the past,’ he said. ‘Repeat it, if you please.’

“Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past,” repeated Winston obediently.

“Who controls the present controls the past,” said O’Brien, nodding his head with slow approval. ‘Is it your opinion, Winston, that the past has real existence?’

Again the feeling of helplessness descended upon Winston. His eyes flitted towards the dial. He not only did not know whether ‘yes’ or ‘no’ was the answer that would save him from pain; he did not even know which answer he believed to be the true one.

O’Brien smiled faintly. ‘You are no metaphysician, Winston,’ he said. ‘Until this moment you had never considered what is meant by existence. I will put it more precisely. Does the past exist concretely, in space? Is there somewhere or other a place, a world of solid objects, where the past is still happening?’

‘No.’

‘Then where does the past exist, if at all?’

‘In records. It is written down.’

‘In records. And — ?’

‘In the mind. In human memories.

‘In memory. Very well, then. We, the Party, control all records, and we control all memories. Then we control the past, do we not?’

‘But how can you stop people remembering things?’ cried Winston again momentarily forgetting the dial. ‘It is involuntary. It is outside oneself. How can you control memory? You have not controlled mine!’

O’Brien’s manner grew stern again. He laid his hand on the dial.

‘On the contrary,’ he said, ‘you have not controlled it. That is what has brought you here. You are here because you have failed in humility, in self-discipline. You would not make the act of submission which is the price of sanity. You preferred to be a lunatic, a minority of one. Only the disciplined mind can see reality, Winston. You believe that reality is something objective, external, existing in its own right. You also believe that the nature of reality is self-evident. When you delude yourself into thinking that you see something, you assume that everyone else sees the same thing as you. But I tell you, Winston, that reality is not external. Reality exists in the human mind, and nowhere else. Not in the individual mind, which can make mistakes, and in any case soon perishes: only in the mind of the Party, which is collective and immortal. Whatever the Party holds to be the truth, is truth. It is impossible to see reality except by looking through the eyes of the Party. That is the fact that you have got to relearn, Winston. It needs an act of self-destruction, an effort of the will. You must humble yourself before you can become sane.’

Nice Quote Adam!Although it might have been helpful to the Newbies to reference the source.George Orwells infamous 1984 Novel am i correct?Its been years since I’ve read it.It should be mandatory reading far any aspiring WN,as it has SOOOOooooo many little sayings and insights.Most people don’t realize its the book that gave us the terms “Big Brother”,”Newspeak” and “Doublethink”,and the concept of never-ending war to perpetuate the State.You must Humble yourself White Man-Before the Jewish God of Multiculturalism,before you can become sane.-Also-Whatever the Party holds to be the Truth,IS truth.Obongo and the Democraps to a tee.

Heil Komerades!(German spelling).In discussing Orwells book,i actually found my old copy,and in perusing randomly came across this little part i would like to share with you all,particularly “Adam”,whose pet subject is the “global technical civilization”.
From the book 1984-“The primary aim of modern warfare(in accordance with the principles of Doublethink,this aim is simultaneously recognized and not recognized by the directing brains of the Inner Party)is to use up the products of the machine without raising the general standard of living.Ever since the end of the 19th century,the problem of what to do with the surplus of consumption goods has been latent in industrial society.At present,when few human beings have enough to eat,this problem is obviously not urgent,and it might not have become so,even if no artificial process of destruction had been at work.The world of today is a bare,hungry,dilapidated place compared to the world that existed before 1914,and still more so if compared with the imaginary future to which the people of that period looked forward.In the early 20th century,the vision of a future society unbelievably rich,leisured,orderly and efficient-a glittering antiseptic world of glass and steel and snow-white concrete-was part of the consciousness of nearly every literate person.Science and technology were developing at a prodigious speed,and it seemed natural to assume that they would go on developing.This failed to happen,partly because of the impoverishment caused by a long series of wars and revolutions,partly because scientific and technical progress depended on the empirical habit of thought,which could not survive in a strictly regimented society.As a whole the world is more primitive today than it was 50 years ago.Certain backward areas have advanced,and various devices,always in some way connected warfare and police espionage,have been developed,but experiment and invention have largely stopped,and the ravages of Atomic war in the 1950’s have never been fully repaired.Nevertheless the dangers inherent in the machine are still there.From the moment when the machine first made its appearance it was clear to all thinking people that the need for human drudgery,and therefore to a great extent for human inequality,had disappeared.If the machine were used for that end-hunger,overwork,dirt,illiteracy,and disease could be eliminated within a few generations.And in fact,without being used for any such purpose,but by a sort of automatic process-by producing wealth which it was impossible not to distribute-the machine did raise the living standards of average human beings very greatly over a period of about 50 years at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries.
But it wa also clear that an all-around increase in wealth threatened the destruction-indeed,in some sense was the destruction-of a hierarchical society.In a world in which everyone worked short hours,had enough to eat,lived in a house with a bathroom and refrigerator,and possessed a motorcar or even airplane,the most obvious form of inequality would have disappeared.If it once became general,wealth would confer no distinction.It was possible,no doubt,to imagine a society in which wealth,in the sense of personal possessions and luxuries,should be evenly distributed,while POWER remained in the hands of a small privaleged caste.But in practice,such a society could not long remain stable.For if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike,the great mass of human beings who are normally stupified by poverty,would become literate and would learn to think for themselves;and once they had done this,they would sooner or later realize that the privaleged minority had no function,and they would sweep it away.In the long run,a hierachical society was only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance.To return to the agricultural past,as some thinkers of the early 20th century dreamed of doing,was not a practical solution.It conflicted with the tendancy toward mechanization which had become quasi-instinctive throughout almost the whole world,and moreover,any country which remained industrially backward,was helpless in a military sense and was bound to be dominated,directly or indirectly by its more advanced rivals.
Nor was it a satisfactory solution to keep the masses in poverty by restricting the flow of goods.This happened to a great extent during the final phase of capitalism,roughly between 1920 and 1940.The economy of many countries was allowed to stagnate,land went out of cultivation,capital equipment was not added to,great blocks of the population were prevented from working and kept half-alive by State charity.But this too,entailed military weakness,and since the privations it inflicted were obviously unnecessary,it made opposition inevitable.The problem was how to keep the wheels of industry turning without increasing the wealth of the world.Goods must be produced,but they need not be distributed evenly.And in practice,the only way of achieving this was by continuous warfare.” pages 155 and 156.
Anybody see any parallels to our society today?With true equality of wealth an prosperity,there is no need for an elite cast,therefore,there wouldn’t be a need for banks or the Jews that run them.Hmmm,anybody see a pattern here?The Jews turned the Promise of the machine age and hope for man into a wielded weapon which set nations against one another,all to maintain their wealth,status and position.Now we have the Perpetual “War on Terror”,which isn’t easily defined,but keeps the people in a state of anxiety and which the State uses to continually bludgeon the People(and our rights) with “For our Protection”.Orwell wrote this in the 50’s,but he seemed to have a gift of political and societal precognition,of the devolution of mankind,and the rise of the all-powerful mind-controlling State.I recommend all newbies and even the Vets out there,that you read this book and compare it to whats happening now in our society.I plan on re-reading it again after i stumbled on that illuminating part.Also,how the State has used technology to spy on,harass,censor and brainwash an otherwise pre-occupied populace.Very timely to today. The “Global Technological Society” marches on-Like a Boot stepping on a human face forever.