20 November, 2009

Radio Interview of Alex Linder

Posted by Socrates in Alex Linder, Linder appearances, radio, Socrates, VNNB, white nationalism, White Nationalists, White philosophy, White solutions, White thought at 2:17 pm | Permanent Link

Linder on MajorityRights Radio, 11/19/09:

[Webpage].

More: [Here].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 04/24/07 WN Radio from Majority Rights 100% similar
  3. 11/16/09 Alex Linder interviewed on Jim Giles `Radio Free Mississippi` 100% similar
  4. 11/21/12 Radio Debate: Hunter Wallace vs. Alex Linder 100% similar
  5. 06/30/08 A Very Happy Birthday to VNN Founder, Alex Linder! 100% similar
  6. 09/17/07 Radio Istina, with Alex Linder – Tuesday 1pm CST 100% similar
  7. 25 Responses to “Radio Interview of Alex Linder”

    1. Andrea Dworkin Says:

      I wonder if Britain has been totally and completely infiltrated by Jews and is not salvageable. They are worse off than the USA but can’t even recognize/acknowledge their Jewish/Liberal problems…

      The UK is like San Francisco formed its own country.

    2. exalted grand-master oberführer double diamond jim! Says:

      only white British children under the age of sixteen or so are “salvagable”……..and……there’s probably a few thousand dedicated, hard-core, WN/NS/”Blood & Honour” types….maybe: thirty-odd thou’ @ most!…..apart from them: the rest of that cuntry is, pretty much, expendable….and……..that’s just the whites there!

    3. exalted grand-master oberführer double diamond jim! Says:

      Alex….looks like that character over @ “SWB” has “chucked in the towel”….i think you pretty much “blew him out of the water”…..fck!!……he couldn’t even answer me ferFCKsake………and, i ain’t no “David Duke”!

    4. Andrea Dworkin Says:

      It wouldn’t have taken much for Jews to have totally bought their way into British aristocracy over the past century plus. You can even see the physical ugliness in most of the people there in their tainted Jewwy asymmetrical features…

      What else would explain a nation of proud fags, liberals and foreigner lovers?

      Jack Straw, Lord Levy, current British Rothschilds, Winston Churchill even David Beckham are all examples to Jew tainted/ruined Britons…

      The Lion of Judah stinks and is not our friend!

    5. Tim McGreen Says:

      Up until a few hundred years ago, the English were the toughest, baddest cats around. But look how weak and effeminate they’ve become after only 300 years of Jewish rule! But in all fairness, it only took about 100 years for the Jews to turn the USA into an emasculated pussified country.

    6. Ein Says:

      Andrea Dworkin Says: “I wonder if Britain has been totally and completely infiltrated by Jews and is not salvageable. They are worse off than the USA, but can’t even recognize/acknowledge their Jewish/Liberal problems…”

      I hate to say it, Andrea, but I think you’re right. They are brainwashed to the nth degree. They are so sick, they don’t even know they’re sick! (And they’d be indignant at your suggesting it.) That’s the mark of a REALLY far-gone case.

      As for the USA going under in a hundred years, just look at Sweden! Until the 20th century, it had hardly any Jews. But with even fewer Jews than we have (physically present, that is), their media and politics are still controlled, and the Swedes are as far gone today as anyone can get. Sweden was a Great Power 3 centuries ago, and the terror of Europe a thousand years ago…. now it’s a joke.

    7. Tim McGreen Says:

      Amazing how a Viking people like the Swedes could be turned into a bunch of self-hating eunuchs in just a few hundred years. Well, at least that other Viking race, the Russians, still have their balls intact.

      Unfortunately, Linder still has vestiges of that libertarian/laissez-faire mentality, the same flawed philosophy that made it possible for Big Money and Big Jew to rule over us in the first place. One must look at the long-term ramifications of one’s beliefs, no matter how principled they may seem at first.

    8. Tim McGreen Says:

      Good comments on Xianity, though. It is a Jew/Levantine mind-control cult that has done far more harm to Western Man than it has supposedly done to the Jews. If Christianity was such a great weapon against the Jews, then why are they still around two thousand years later? And why are they stronger than ever? Our pagan ancestors would never have put up with this shit. Christianity slowly conditioned them to accept the Jews in their midst.

    9. zoomcopter Says:

      Great interview. I liked the home-schooling ideas. Good solid practical plans are always welcomed.

    10. Tom McReen Says:

      “If Christianity was such a great weapon against the Jews, then why are they still around two thousand years later? And why are they stronger than ever?”

      Erm, the mass media, television, jew bankers, marxism…

      “Christianity slowly conditioned them to accept the Jews in their midst.”

      By the scurrilous plan of teaching that jews killed Christ and are the spawn of satan himself.

      “Our pagan ancestors would never have put up with this shit.”

      Their patience would have been tested by you, that’s for sure.

    11. Adam Says:

      It would have been interesting to hear a bit more about Alex’s idea of a mixed form of gov’t for his theoretical white nation, which he sketched briefly as a generally libertarian state overseen by a racial dictatorship. A lot of objections could be made to this, and I’ll offer a couple here.

      For one thing, it’s not clear what form Alex envisioned it would take. Would this racial dictatorship have as its objective merely preserving the white race or some subset thereof — much as the current regime might try to preserve the spotted owl or the snail darter; or did he have in mind giving his dictatorship authority to implement a total eugenic re-design of the white race, a sort of genetic makeover akin to the Lebensborn program in Hitler’s Germany? Unless carried out with self-conscious inefficiency, the latter case would necessarily take on a totalitarian aspect very quickly. Clearly, the racial dictatorship would have to assume absolute control of the people’s sex and reproductive lives in order to achieve its objectives. There could be no exceptions, because even a single unauthorized reproductive event might endanger the whole project. On the other hand, the former seems less ambitious, but raises different issues. What are the ramifications of helping the white race to survive, when it has grown so weak, maladapted, and endangered that it requires the intervention of gov’t to keep it from disappearing? The white man as snail darter — there’s something comical about it, and dysgenic too.

      In my opinion, the mixed form Alex envisions resembles nothing more than our current system, which is careful to maintain the appearance of a somewhat free society on the surface, but that conceals a Jewish racial dictatorship at its core. It’s true that under the current system the education system and mass media aren’t really free, but to the extent that they are controlled, they are controlled to favor Jews, who are in this society the dominant race; in other words, they are controlled in just the same way that Alex’s racial dictatorship would be forced to control education and mass media in his theoretical white nation. So the net increase in freedom would be zero, although the race at the top of the hierarchy would change.

    12. John Denton Says:

      It was good to hear the interviewer correct Alex about Muslims in Britain by stating that they’re not a problem. Or to be more precise, they’re only a nuisance in a limited number of areas where they live in substantial numbers. But its absurd the way the BNP and the media promote the view they are taking over the country and Islamifying it. This exaggeration about them overshadows immigration from all ethnic groups and miscegenation of indigenous whites with Jews and immigrants.

    13. Glenn Miller Says:

      I listened to about 80% of Alex’s interview by the Englishman, and all by Jim Giles. First I’d tuned into for years. Us old rednecks think we know it all, anyway. But I was pleasantly surprised by how much I enjoyed Alex speak. No one explains the jews better or in so few words. It’s a damn shame we haven’t implimented ways to attract more lemmings to WN radio talks shows.

    14. Adam Says:

      Alex’s idea of an annual blood sacrifice by his warrior caste of Defenders is also good. I understand him to mean that these Defenders of the race will be dictators with essentially unlimited power, and that the annual sacrifice will be exacted of them as a kind of payment for their prestige and privilege. Alex indicated that such sacrifice would keep them pure, and “encourage the others.”

      A very large part of the white race’s current difficulty — the sheeplike equanimity with which it contemplates and even engineers its own demise being a prime example of this — is that, as a side effect of the ease and luxury of modern life, it has become effeminate and unfamiliar with death. Though they may have seen tens of thousands of cinematic depictions of death, the vast majority of modern white people have never witnessed (let alone caused) a real death up close, as in technological society death usually takes place far from public view. Even military combat veterans may only have fired their weapons in the direction of an enemy, not seeing the effect; even their injured comrades that the medical personnel can’t save are often whisked away from combat before dying. This sort of life, continued for decades, results in softness in a people, a people who, precisely because they don’t know death and have never seen its face, think that they would rather die than give offense to Jews, or die rather than be called a racist. We’ve become a race of slaves who may realize intellectually that we are all going to eventually die, but it isn’t real to us. We live our lives as though we were going to live ten thousand years. By contrast, only a man who knows death and isn’t afraid is truly free. A knowledge of death gives life.

      Alex seems to understand instinctively that it is the culture that must be changed in order to bring back the ancient Aryan warrior spirit. Though one might quarrel with particulars of his plan, the general idea is sound. Our people used to have a legendary contempt for death, as shown, for example, in the gladiatorial combats of old Rome. This is an attitude that should be cultivated and brought back. On a typical day in Rome perhaps fifty pairs of gladiators might publicly fight each other to the death, and such celebrations might go one for days, weeks, and even months. This was both entertaining and instructive for the people. It helped give the Romans the kind of spirit they needed when, after they had suppressed the Spartacus slave revolt, they crucified 6600 rebel slaves — that’s one about every hundred yards, along the whole 400 mile distance from Rome to Brundisium, via the Appian Way. They left the crucified bodies to rot, an example to others of how Rome dealt with traitors that continued to improve the character of natives and visitors alike for years.

    15. Tim McGreen Says:

      Actually, most gladiator fights were not to the death, just like Nero did not fiddle while Rome burned. Fiddles weren’t even invented yet. And the Jew actor Kirk Douglas did not lead a slave revolt against Rome, either.

    16. Adam Says:

      Is there anything a Jew will not try to crap on? I doubt it.

      Morituri, Cæsar, te salutemus!

      “We who are about to die salute you, Caesar!”

      Thus did the gladiators address Caesar before fighting and dying in the arena.

      Cicero had this to say:

      “Even when they have been felled, let alone when they are standing and fighting, they never disgrace themselves. And suppose a gladiator has been brought to the ground, when do you ever see one twist his neck away after he has been ordered to extend it for the death blow?” [Cicero's] own death would later emulate this example.[206][207] Courage, dignity, altruism and loyalty were redemptive.

      Also, something for the Jews among us to keep in mind: The distance between New York City and San Francisco is about 2900 miles. 5.4 million Jews in the USA means that one could be nailed about every 3 feet, if my math is correct.

    17. Tim McGreen Says:

      “We who are about to die salute you, Caesar!”

      The Gladiators didn’t say that, the soldiers of the Roman Legions did just before going into battle. Like I just said, most Gladiator fights were not fought to the death. Pay attention.

    18. Adam Says:

      The Jew, caught in one lie, repeats it, and adds another. That’s what you call chutzpah. Right Shlomo?

    19. Hoff Says:

      The jews loooove “democracy”. The more “democracy” the more power do the jews have. Sweden is very “democracy”. After America Sweden is probably the biggest jew whore nation in the world. Denmark and Norway not far behind. Today jews own all the “media” in Swe, Dk and N. Every single party in Scandinavia is down on it’s knees sucking up to the jews. Sweden is totally pussified.

      “One of the last prohibitions was not removed until 1951, which stated that Jews could not hold political office. Once becoming full citizens, Jews were treated as peers and anti-Semitism was rare.”

      http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/vjw/Sweden.html

    20. Ein Says:

      “We who are about to die salute you, Caesar!”

      Frankly, that is insane. It’s pathetic.
      It’s the oozing pus of a sick, twisted, slave-run society, a ruthless dictatorship headed by madmen who had made themselves gods and demanded that they be worshipped. It was a servile, terrorized populace with nowhere to turn who were forced to salute the monster who degraded and brutalized them and held their life in his hands.

      That’s nothing to adulate, but to deplore! Thank goodness humanity is finally past all of that. Let’s hope!

      Those poor wretches had no choice but to grovel and die. Revolt was impossible. Spartacus had already learned that.

      But (I could add this) civilization is an unnatural thing. It requires a lot of constant work to sustain it. And that work has to be done by someone. Without the technology that Adam deplores, that meant slaves. Rome was literally built, not by Caesars but by slaves — brick by brick and stone by stone. And it was toiling, suffering, sweating slaves that kept it going. They were cheap and expendable, as a result of Rome’s many wars. Thus, there was no need to develop machines or technology.

      Myself, if given the choice between slavery and technology, I’ll take technology, thank you. The world isn’t perfect, but we’re better off now than we were then.

    21. Adam Says:

      Ein Says:

      “We who are about to die salute you, Caesar!”

      Frankly, that is insane. It’s pathetic.
      It’s the oozing pus of a sick, twisted, slave-run society, a ruthless dictatorship headed by madmen who had made themselves gods and demanded that they be worshipped. It was a servile, terrorized populace with nowhere to turn who were forced to salute the monster who degraded and brutalized them and held their life in his hands.

      Yes, Rome was a martial culture, sadistic by the standards of men softened by technological civilization. Although some were volunteers, most of the gladiators were condemned men: robbers, murderers, highwaymen, or enemies of the state — noxii. Brutal as fighting and dying in the arena was, it still may have been better than being worked to death on the latifundia (agricultural plantations) or, worst of all, the Roman mines. No doubt a soft-hearted fellow like Ein would prefer that the murderers of Knoxville and Wichita not meet such a cruel fate as being torn to pieces by wild animals, or being hacked or burnt to death by sword or fire; or that we not damage our precious Sheenies by lining the transcontinental highway system with them in the old style, as I suggested above. That’s what the Romans would have done with them, but truth be told, sometimes even the Romans grew weary of all the bloodshed.

      Here is what Seneca says about an afternoon at the games.

      I’ve happened to drop in upon the midday entertainment of the arena in hope of some milder diversions, a spice of comedy, a touch of the relief in which men’s eyes may find rest after a glut of human blood. No, no: far from it. All the previous fighting was mere softness of heart. Away with such tomfoolery: now for butchery pure and simple! The combatants have nothing to protect them: their bodies are utterly open to every blow: never a thrust but finds its mark. Most people prefer this kind of thing to all other matches, whether part of the program or by special request. Naturally so. The sword is not checked by helmet or shield. What good is armor? What good is swordsmanship? All these things only put off death a little. In the morning men are matched with lions and bears, at noon with their spectators. These pit butcher actual against butcher prospectively and reserve the winner for another bloody bout: death is the fighters’ only exit, the thing done by fire and sword. “But this, that, or the other fellow has committed highway robbery!” Well? “And murder!” As a murderer, then he deserved what he’s getting: What’s your crime, unlucky creature, that you should watch it? “Kill! Flog! Burn! Why does he rush upon the blade so timidly? Why shrink back from killing? Why die with so little courage?” The lash forces them on to the sword. “Let them have at each other in the nude — get in at the bare chest!” There’s a break in the show. “Cut a few throats to keep things going!” Come now, can’t you people see even this much — that bad examples recoil on those who set them?

      [Casu in meridianum spectaculum incidi lusus expectans et sales et aliquid laxamenti, quo hominum oculi ab humano cruore adquiescunt; contra est. Quicquid ante pugnatum est, misericordia fuit. Nunc omissis nugis mera homicidia sunt. Nihil habent quo tegantur, ad ictum totis corporibus expositi numquam frustra manum mittunt. [4] Hoc plerique ordinariis paribus et postulaticiis praeferunt. Quidni praeferant? Non galea, non scuto repellitur ferrum. Quo muni menta ? Quo artes ? Omnia ista mortis morae sunt. Mane leonibus et ursis homines, meridie spectatoribus suis obiciuntur. Interfectores interfecturis iubent obici et victorem in aliam detinent caedem. Exitus pugnantium mors est; ferro et igne res geritur. Haec fiunt, dum vacat harena. ” [5] Sed latrocinium fecit [32] aliquis, occidit hominem.” Quid ergo ? 1 Quia occidit ille, meruit ut hoc pateretur; tu quid meruisti miser, ut hoc spectes ? ” Occide, verbera, ure ! Quare tam timide incurrit in ferrum ? Quare parum audacter occidit ? Quare parum libenter moritur ? Plagis agatur 2 in vulnera, mutuos ictus nudis et obviis pectoribus excipiant.” Intermissum est spectaculum: “interim iugulentur homines, ne nihil agatur.”

      Age, ne hoc quidem intellegitis, mala exempla in eos redundare, qui faciunt ?]
      Seneca, Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales (Eng. trans. modified from Michael Grant, in The World of Rome

      That’s nothing to adulate, but to deplore! Thank goodness humanity is finally past all of that. Let’s hope!

      Those poor wretches had no choice but to grovel and die. Revolt was impossible. Spartacus had already learned that.

      But (I could add this) civilization is an unnatural thing. It requires a lot of constant work to sustain it. And that work has to be done by someone. Without the technology that Adam deplores, that meant slaves. Rome was literally built, not by Caesars but by slaves — brick by brick and stone by stone. And it was toiling, suffering, sweating slaves that kept it going. They were cheap and expendable, as a result of Rome’s many wars. Thus, there was no need to develop machines or technology.

      Myself, if given the choice between slavery and technology, I’ll take technology, thank you. The world isn’t perfect, but we’re better off now than we were then.

      As I’ve said before — and all this demonstrates again — the type of culture a society has, and the quality of the men in it, is bound up with a given state of development of the technological system. The Romans certainly didn’t take any shit from the Jews, and no doubt would have found the current passivity of whites unfathomable and unmanly. Deplore the state of society when Aryans ruled the world, if you like. Prefer our softer age, the technological doom you have selected for yourselves, if you must. But at least know the truth: that you have chosen your own fate. It’s nothing being imposed on you against your will by a bunch of scrawny, loud-mouthed Jews, so quit pretending. It’s being done with your full cooperation. Your enslavement is of your own making, as is your genocide.

      As for Alex’s vision of a cadre of Defenders of the white race, ten or so of whom would be prepared to offer themselves up as human sacrifice annually, we can see how laughable and unlikely that is to happen given how soft technological civilization has made men. Only the complete overthrow of the global technological system will allow the necessary spirit of the warrior to emerge once more.

    22. Tim McGreen Says:

      {No doubt a soft-hearted fellow like Ein would prefer that the murderers of Knoxville and Wichita not meet such a cruel fate as being torn to pieces by wild animals, or being hacked or burnt to death by sword or fire; or that we not damage our precious Sheenies by lining the transcontinental highway system with them in the old style, as I suggested above.}
      …………………………………………………
      For once, I agree with you, Adam. But is Ein soft-hearted or soft-headed?

    23. Ein Says:

      “Brutal as fighting and dying in the arena was, it still may have been better than being worked to death on the latifundia (agricultural plantations) or, worst of all, the Roman mines. No doubt a soft-hearted fellow like Ein would prefer that the murderers of Knoxville and Wichita not meet such a cruel fate as being torn to pieces by wild animals, or being hacked or burnt to death by sword or fire” –Adam
      ………………………………

      I’ll agree. I suppose they would have agreed with you too, given that they chose that alternative voluntarily. But what other options did they have? It was that or, as you say, a slow death in the mines or the galleys. At least a gladiator had a chance at fame and glory… if only briefly. But what a pathetic choice!

      I would not care to return to a Roman-type situation, where the strong devour the weak and society’s losers are fed to the lions; nor even to the Middle Ages which were, I suppose, somewhat better. We’ve come a long way, and very painfully, though we still have a long way to go. But why turn around and go backwards?

      Incidentally, I’ve never said a word here about the Knoxv. criminals, much less any sympathy. I don’t consider myself a “soft” person at all – perhaps by YOUR standards! – but most people would consider me a ruthless, flaming rightist. I am, though, a person of my age, inevitably. Your standards, however, are those of another world that’s long past.

      Since I like your writing (generally) and agree with you on so many points, I don’t know why you are so hostile and argumentative! Nobody agrees on everything. Do you insult everybody? Do you have any friends?

    24. Ein Says:

      Oh, incidentally, I wanted to say, back to the topic of this thread, that I found the MR radio interview very interesting. I PARTICULARLY liked the discussion in the comment section that followed. Some of them were remarkably perceptive.

    25. Brent Says:

      We must secure the existence of out people and a future for white children.

      northwestfront.org