20 December, 2009

Moral Outrage and Other Things

Posted by Socrates in Alex Linder, genocide, genocide by jew, Jewish cruelty, jewish hate & hypocrisy, Jewish Tyranny, judaism, Socrates, Talmud at 4:56 pm | Permanent Link

Newbies, notice that expulsions of the Jews from various countries (there have been dozens over the centuries) have never worked, i.e., they always manage to return. Linder was merely offering an alternate viewpoint, one that other WNs are afraid to consider – at least in public. But wait: don’t the Jews themselves advocate the genocide of non-Jews? Yes, they do. They write: “Tob shebbe goyim harog” (that’s from the Talmud. Translated from yid-speak, it means “kill even the best of the gentiles”). In fact, genocide is an old, Jewish thing:

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 10/18/07 The 1915 Armenian Genocide and the U.S. Resolution About It 31% similar
  3. 10/20/13 Germans: the Masters of Genocide? 30% similar
  4. 08/18/14 Jews are the World’s Moral Compass 30% similar
  5. 06/17/09 Enron, Fastow, and the Looting of America 29% similar
  6. 04/23/14 Behind America’s Moral Decay 29% similar
  7. 36 Responses to “Moral Outrage and Other Things”

    1. Nordlander Says:

      “the magnitude of the atrocity being advocated”

      Yes, human history is truly shocking for those on a Hollywood diet. Oh no, the magnitude of it! To think that someone in our enlightened age would talk about violence! Why, that is certainly not what every presidential candidate did last year when they approved of nuclear bombings to kill millions of Iranians, code-worded as “leaving all options on the table” nyuk nyuk.

      Violence when suggested by the establishment: perfectly all right. And something Hunter Wallace will only disagree with in a proper academic manner, arguing the facts as one gentleman to another. But violence when suggested by someone else: absolutely taboo. Shocking. Extremist. Unheard of.

      “It is clear to me now that the extreme anti-Semitism within the White Nationalist movement promoted by genocidal maniacs is a serious problem.”

      Is this guy for real? What we now call White Nationalism is built pretty much entirely on the ideas of William Pierce, picking up the mantle from George Lincoln Rockwell before him. These men and others are of course “extreme anti-Semites,” because that is the only correct reaction to the fact that Jews control the media and use that power to push for mass immigration and racial integration. They are waging demographic war on us – and that is not just a fancy word, it is very real. The effects are felt not only in Los Angeles, not only in Boston, but in Ottawa, Sydney, London, Marseille, Frankfurt, Stockholm, Oslo, Milan – all over the West. The victims number in the hundreds of thousands.

      Hunter Wallace thinks that opposition to this violence done against us, and the belief that this force must eventually be met with force to free ourselves from the status quo, is “extreme anti-Semitism” that has no place in White Nationalism?

      Sounds to me like yet another hijacker, of which there are plenty in nationalism. You end up with a watered-down anti-immigration party that says immigrants are okay as long as they change from Muslim to Christian. No joke. This is the case with many nationalist parties in Europe. The Hunter Wallaces of the world are the termites sinking the truth ship.

      “I have delinked their websites, banned their IP addresses, and added both to the comment filter.”

      What does this sound like? It sounds just like the enemies we are supposedly opposing. Those who try to silence anyone they don’t agree with, instead of debating them.

      Hunter Wallace complains that Alex Linder has “smeared” his friend Jared Taylor. Why not? Jared Taylor takes money from Jewish financiers, obviously with the condition that those who tell the truth about Jewish ownership in the media be told to shut up, and if they don’t comply are thrown out. He goes the way the owners of Free Republic did when they as the first big conservative forum on the internet took money from Jewish financiers, who demanded that criticism of Israel be banned from the site.

      Who is at fault here, Hunter Wallace? The one who sells out to the enemy, or the one who calls him on it?

      Of course, Hunter Wallace won’t answer this. Delinking, banning IPs and all that.

    2. Nordlander Says:

      One more thing: there is a use for anti-immigration voices that don’t name the Jew and don’t talk about race. Such voices – such parties – will help wake up the average lemmings who would never go online and find out the truth about things. They will help create an atmosphere where more will find their way to the real deal.

      But there is a difference between such anti-immigrant parties and websites, and those who do their best to silence the voices who tell the whole truth. The supposed nationalists who spend half their energy attacking “extremists” in the feeble hope of ingratiating themselves with the establishment – which never comes true.

      Hunter Wallace should realize one thing about the times we live in now. These times are different than the past. We stand at a crossroads, where the economy is going downhill in the coming years, with major upheavals as a result. If he holds to the old conservative betrayal of the “extremist anti-Semites” as he calls them, people who speak the truth and who speak honestly about violence – then he is standing on the wrong side of history. The future is not a middle-aged conservative gentleman wrapping criticism of immigration in a blanket of intellectual terminology. The future is a swarm of young men facing the enemy in the streets.

    3. Z.O.G. Says:

      EXPULSIONS OF THE JEWS

      YEAR _______________ PLACE

      70——————————Jerusalem

      132-35————————-Bar Kochba

      250 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Carthage

      379-95————————-“Unconverted” Jews expelled from Spain.

      415 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Alexandria

      554 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Diocese of Clement (France)

      561 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Diocese of Uzzes (France)

      612 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Visigoth Spain

      642 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Visigoth Empire

      855 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Italy

      876 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Sens

      1012 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Mainz

      1096 ————————— Crusades: 12,000 Jews killed in Germany.

      1121 ————————— “Unconverted” Jews expelled from Belgium.

      1181 ————————— Jews expelled from France by King Philip

      1182 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – France

      1182 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Germany

      1189 ————————— British Crown lays claim to Jewish possessions

      1290 ————————— All but 16,000 Jews expelled from England

      1298 ————————— 140 European Jewish communities destroyed.

      1276 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Upper Bavaria

      1290 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – England

      1306 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – France

      1322 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – France (again)

      1348 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Switzerland

      1349 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Hielbronn (Germany)

      1349 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Saxony

      1349 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Hungary

      1360 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Hungary

      1370 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Belgium

      1380 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Slovakia

      1388 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Strasbourg

      1394 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Germany

      1394 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – France

      1420 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Lyons

      1421 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Austria

      1424 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Fribourg

      1424 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Zurich

      1424 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Cologne

      1432 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Savoy

      1438 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Mainz

      1439 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Augsburg

      1442 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Netherlands

      1444 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Netherlands

      1446 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Bavaria

      1453 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – France

      1453 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Breslau

      1454 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Wurzburg

      1462 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Mainz

      1483 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Mainz

      1484 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Warsaw

      1485 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Vincenza (Italy)

      1492 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Spain

      1492 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Italy

      1495 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Lithuania

      1496 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Naples

      1496 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Portugal

      1498 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Nuremberg

      1498 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Navarre

      1510 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Brandenberg

      1510 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Prussia

      1514 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Strasbourg

      1515 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Genoa

      1519 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Regensburg

      1533 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Naples

      1541 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Naples

      1542 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Prague & Bohemia

      1550 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Genoa

      1551 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Bavaria

      1555 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Pesaro

      1557 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Prague

      1559 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Austria

      1561 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Prague

      1567 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Wurzburg

      1569 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Papal States

      1571 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Brandenburg

      1582 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Netherlands

      1582 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Hungary

      1593 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Brandenburg, Austria

      1597 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Cremona, Pavia & Lodi

      1614 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Frankfort

      1615 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Worms

      1619 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Kiev

      1648 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Ukraine

      1648 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Poland

      1649 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Hamburg

      1654 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Little Russia (Beylorus)

      1656 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Lithuania

      1669 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Oran (North Africa)

      1669 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Vienna

      1670 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Vienna

      1712 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Sandomir

      1727 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Russia

      1738 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Wurtemburg

      1740 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Little Russia (Beylorus)

      1744 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Prague, Bohemia

      1744 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Slovakia

      1744 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Livonia

      1745 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Moravia

      1753 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Kovad (Lithuania)

      1761 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Bordeaux

      1772 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Deported to the Pale of Settlement (Poland/Russia)

      1775 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Warsaw

      1789 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Alcace

      1804 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Villages in Russia

      1808 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Villages & Countrysides (Russia)

      1815 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Lubeck & Bremen

      1815 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria

      1820 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Bremen

      1843 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Russian Border Austria & Prussia

      1862 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Area in the U.S. under Grant’s Jurisdiction

      1866 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Galatz, Romania

      1880s – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Russia

      1891 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Moscow

      1919 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Bavaria (foreign born Jews)

      1938-45 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Nazi Controlled Areas

      1948 — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Arab Countries

    4. Sgt. Skull Says:

      Great analysis Nordlander.

      I’m becoming more convinced the more I read that “Hunter Wallace” is probably part Jewish. He’s turned into a total whack job since Linder advocated the extermination of the Jews. I’ve noticed this with Jews before where if you even slightly criticize them they become unhinged and start lashing out in all directions at everyone is sight.

      He’s also dodging questions about his hypocrisy. He still can’t get it through his thick skull that demographic warfare is a form of genocide.

    5. lawrence dennis Says:

      Freedom will not return to earth until the Jews are gone.

    6. Johnny Says:

      Well, another alternative is eliminating all non-whites. That way the Jew has noone to use against man, and we wouldn’t have to kill the few decent Jews that there are, and believe me, there are some. After a few generations absorption and Aryanization would occur, anyways. Of course, to prove I’m not a Jew, I also wouldn’t be that squeamish if all the Jews were rounded up and sterilized or killed. Momentary guilt, but, of course, the death of even the nicest Jews is warranted given the losses of Whites they have engendered as a people.

    7. Fade the Butcher=Friedrich Braun? Says:

      A question that needs an answer — is Friedrich Braun one of the many pseudonyms of Fade the Butcher, also known as Hunter Wallace, Prozium and so on of Occidental Dissent and formerly Odessa Syndicate?

      We definitely need to answer this question.

      http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=105291

    8. Irma Grese Says:

      So THIS is what White Nationalism has devolved into. Amazing. Amazing.

      Nordlander Says: What does this sound like? It sounds just like the enemies we are supposedly opposing. Those who try to silence anyone they don’t agree with, instead of debating them.

      Yes. EXACTLY. it is SAD, too, becase I like lurking at OD – there are some very intelligent posters there, and they have helped educate THIS newbie enormously over the last several months. I shall be taking his articles swith SEVERAL grains of salt now.

      Nordlander Says: The future is not a middle-aged conservative gentleman wrapping criticism of immigration in a blanket of intellectual terminology. The future is a swarm of young men facing the enemy in the streets.

      AMEN! AMEN!! I hope to our ancestors shades that you are right, Nordlander. I fear sometimes that Pierce’s Turner Diaries and Covington’s NW Trilogy both have it wrong: when the system finally DOES collapse, all too many whites will go quietly to their deaths. The hard core that ops to fight will be the ones to build the future – IF they can WIN.

    9. Howdy Doody Says:

      The NKVD forces have so much time and money on their hands i.e. they have to IMO cook up false flag goons like Halvin Turder, and lurk any web site or forum for folks that speaking their minds and hearts.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M58Wewdaurc&feature=related

    10. Adam Says:

      This whole frumious rumpus is pathetic low comedy, a demonstration of how unserious whites are about their own survival. What was the supposed advantage in openly discussing this issue? Why, especially, when you don’t have the power to carry out anything of the kind? Empty threats are not good policy, unless the goal is something other than what’s stated. Uncle Wolf did not do so, nor Dr. Goebbels. Alex would have been well-advised to follow their example.

      If our loose association of white advocates were in earnest about saving their race, they would swear off this kind of slapstick. They’d break up into cells and turn their attentions to more interesting topics: genetic engineering, nanotechnology, and AI/robotics. In all probability, it is in these areas that the final solution to the Jewish question will actually be found.

      http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy_pr.html

    11. PW Says:

      Adam:”They’d break up into cells and turn their attentions to more interesting topics: genetic engineering, nanotechnology, and AI/robotics.”

      But I thought you were an anti-technologist, Adam?

    12. Igor Alexander Says:

      Looks like I missed a lot of excitement in the 2 or 3 days I wasn’t on the forum.

    13. Ivan Says:

      What was the supposed advantage in openly discussing this issue? Why, especially, when you don’t have the power to carry out anything of the kind? Empty threats are not good policy, unless the goal is something other than what’s stated. Uncle Wolf did not do so, nor Dr. Goebbels. Alex would have been well-advised to follow their example. (-Adam)

      Adam makes a good point. WNs are not anywhere near to exterminating one single Jew much less the whole parasitic tribe. It is true also that Alex’s idea that getting rid of the parasites as a whole once and for all is more than justified will not attract the lemmings. But Alex is not running for office. His job at this stage, I believe , is to antagonize the tension between the Jews and the rest as much as he possibly can. And he does a good gob at that; his efforts will be more and more effective as things deteriorate everywhere, especially in America. Besides, rebels like Alex ang Giles help to make it crystal clear who is who in the so-called WN movement. The absolutely uncompromising behavior of these gentlemen may become contagious when the time comes. And the time will come.

    14. Nordlander Says:

      Adam: “Alex would have been well-advised to follow their example.”

      Alex Linder is one of those Whites who simply can’t stand the thought of not being honest. Others say be smart, be tactical, do the clever thing and lie, either by omission or commission. Alex just doesn’t have it in him to act that way. It is a very White flaw, and often leads to a path away from what is the clever thing to do. But I am still glad that some Whites still have it. Like William Pierce said, I think it is important that at least someone speaks the whole truth.

      Let the philo-Semites rant and rave against this and prove their pro-Jewish credentials that way. Let them cry, “Take him, not me! He’s the extremist, not me!” The world still runs the way Alex Linder describes it, always has and always will.

      A guy like Hunter Wallace would have adopted a policy of appeasement in the Hunnic Empire, and labeled the rebels as extremists. In the end the rebels crushed the Huns and they exist no more. When is Hunter Wallace going to write a piece lamenting this? Or is it only when he thinks it benefits him that he will spew hatred over those who name tribal warfare for what it is?

    15. Irma Grese Says:

      Adam Says: They’d break up into cells and turn their attentions to more interesting topics: genetic engineering, nanotechnology, and AI/robotics. In all probability, it is in these areas that the final solution to the Jewish question will actually be found.

      LOL! THIS from Mr. “TECHNOLOGY IZ EVIL LETS ALL GO BAK 2 THE MIDDLE AGES *click* TECHNOLOGY IZ EVIL LETS ALL GO BAK 2 THE MIDDLE AGES *click* TECHNOLOGY IZ EVIL LETS ALL GO BAK 2 THE MIDDLE AGES *click*” ad nauseum. I take it you’ve changed your tune??

      Nordlander Says: Like William Pierce said, I think it is important that at least someone speaks the whole truth. Let the philo-Semites rant and rave against this and prove their pro-Jewish credentials that way.

      Yes. They mark themselves as the SELLOUTS they are when they say these sorts of things. I hope their words are remembered when the revolution comes.

    16. Adam Says:

      Irma Grese Says:

      Adam Says: They’d break up into cells and turn their attentions to more interesting topics: genetic engineering, nanotechnology, and AI/robotics. In all probability, it is in these areas that the final solution to the Jewish question will actually be found.

      LOL! THIS from Mr. “TECHNOLOGY IZ EVIL LETS ALL GO BAK 2 THE MIDDLE AGES *click* TECHNOLOGY IZ EVIL LETS ALL GO BAK 2 THE MIDDLE AGES *click* TECHNOLOGY IZ EVIL LETS ALL GO BAK 2 THE MIDDLE AGES *click*” ad nauseum. I take it you’ve changed your tune??

      The Jewish question and destroying the technological system are two problems with the same solution. It is in those areas of study that die Endlösung will most likely be found.

    17. Adam Says:

      Nordlander Says:

      Adam: “Alex would have been well-advised to follow their example.”

      Alex Linder is one of those Whites who simply can’t stand the thought of not being honest. Others say be smart, be tactical, do the clever thing and lie, either by omission or commission. Alex just doesn’t have it in him to act that way. … Let the philo-Semites rant and rave against this and prove their pro-Jewish credentials that way.

      There are techniques that work, and those that don’t. I’m sure the real Jews and philo-semites would like us to stick to the latter.

    18. Career Gal Says:

      Alex’s is exactly the wrong policy to pursue if we want jobs on The New York Times, influencing the culture like this great conservative mind!!

      How can I make middle-class money in a suit-and-tie job doing this? That is question one. It is also question sum. The only reason to do anything is to make a nice living out of it among nice people, with nice, manicured nails. All this talk of demographics, genocide, and the death of my people is unpleasant, so you are unpleasant for talking like that. I shall ignore you unpleasant people. Frum is a true hero – tackling the real issues of the day in a lucrative, respectable fashion.

      PS: Please make your donations to me via Pay Pal, and be warned that if you ever disagree with me, or fail to mind your manners, I will cut you off. Mind your p’s and q’s, or else.

      Signed,

      Career Gal
      cunt.org

    19. sean gruber Says:

      “I have delinked their websites, banned their IP addresses, and added both to the comment filter.”

      I see a positive FLURRY of de-friending on Facebook as well!

      Oh noes!

    20. sean gruber Says:

      “There are techniques that work, and those that don’t.”

      Under the rubble, in his bunker, the defeated Hitler was overheard to remark that his number one mistake was that he was not extreme enough. “Afterward, you rue the fact that you were so kind.” (Reported by Paul Johnson in _Modern Times_).

      As David Irving has shown, Hitler did not order any extermination policy. He merely wanted the jews deported from Germany (and the partisans cleared out from the eastern front).

      One wonders if he meant that his big mistake was in not taking his own (or some people’s) rhetoric more seriously, and not having a policy of extermination. I believe this is the case. His policy on jews was not tough enough: removal of legal rights, deportation out of Germany, ignore international kikery emigrating and ganging up on him. As Linder pointed out, he did not even kidnap Germany’s jews and hold them for protection against the latter threat!

      “Afterward, you rue the fact that you were so kind.”

      We have been kind for many centuries – as Z.O.G. has shown above. We have treated jews as just another white competitor. Expel them, defeat them in a fair battle, require a little water splashed on their foreheads and a priest’s words. Meanwhile, Whites will be a minority in USA in 2048, and kikes continue to promote this and to fatten on us. Hey, do you know where your family is? See this.

    21. Z.O.G. Says:

      You guys better watch out. He might write another essay about this, and then you’ll really be sorry!

    22. alex Says:

      What was the supposed advantage in openly discussing this issue? Why, especially, when you don’t have the power to carry out anything of the kind? Empty threats are not good policy,

      If I don’t have the power to carry it out, then how can it be a threat? It’s not a threat. It’s an argument that is the product of analysis. The reaction to it shows me that it’s correct. Neither you nor anyone else has showed where it’s wrong. The point of bringing it up is so that it begins to be thought about and taken seriously. At some point, some white man will have the chance to make the decision on what to do about the jews, and I want him to realize that all the other ways of dealing with jews have failed. Time to try the one that works.

    23. Hitler's Missing Nut Says:

      [wrong, wrong, completely wrong, and wrong]

      Some new strategy is needed, as Linder has also pointed out, the answer may be the Jews should have their own planet?”

    24. alex Says:

      According to Linder the host population attempting to kill the Jews is nothing new. History is littered with it, and for Linder to start advocating for the extermination of the Jews is nothing new or original, and nothing that has any practical value based on thousands of years of past results!

      No, you illiterate, that’s the opposite of what I said. The host population has NEVER once in history attempted a comprehensive solution to the jewish problem. All it has done is kill a few here or there, or expel a few. That doesn’t work. They just come back, somebody lets them in, they do even worse than they were doing before. The whole point of my argument is that an across-the-board extermination (which is not the same as murder) is the only way to solve the problem for all time.

    25. alex Says:

      The other reason to raise the extermination argument is that, if enough rational people do it, it will raise the question:

      What are the jews doing that intelligent men are led to speculate about the desirability of doing away with them altogether?

      Thus, it is another way to draw attention to the problems our race faces in light of the genocidal loxists running our countries.

    26. Adam Says:

      alex Says:

      What was the supposed advantage in openly discussing this issue? Why, especially, when you don’t have the power to carry out anything of the kind? Empty threats are not good policy,

      If I don’t have the power to carry it out, then how can it be a threat? It’s not a threat. It’s an argument that is the product of analysis. The reaction to it shows me that it’s correct. Neither you nor anyone else has showed where it’s wrong. The point of bringing it up is so that it begins to be thought about and taken seriously. At some point, some white man will have the chance to make the decision on what to do about the jews, and I want him to realize that all the other ways of dealing with jews have failed. Time to try the one that works.

      My point was that it would be better to work on obtaining the technical means to solve the problem than to say something that will no doubt be interpreted as a threat, thereby calling negative attention to yourself and driving away your own supporters, who have no stomach for the proposal when put in such blunt terms. Of course, as you say, the only reason that it isn’t a threat, at least under the law, is that you have no such means available — the very definition of an empty threat.

      Researches into genetic engineering, however, might lead to many different approaches. For just one example, there’s good reason to think that Jewish ethnocentrism and ethnic hostility has a genetic basis. If this basis could be discovered, once it’s known, it could be disabled. Then the Jews would no longer pose a problem. The Jewish vampire would be de-fanged.

      In any case, whites interested in preserving their race should acquaint themselves with all of those areas of study, since threats to race will arise from all of them. The present century is shaping up as the Age of Genetic Engineering. That genetic engineering technology may well also lead to results that prove lethal to the entire technological system is just a bonus.

    27. Tim McGreen Says:

      You can no more genetically de-program a Jew from being a Jew than you can genetically de-program a virus from being a virus.

    28. Ivan Says:

      The whole point of my argument is that an across-the-board extermination (which is not the same as murder) is the only way to solve the problem for all time.

      This argument sounds perfectly reasonable and compelling to me. “Across-the-board extermination” is rather poor choice of words but the idea behind the argument does not sound outrageous either. It may sound paradoxical, but even the implementation of the idea can be carried out and it can be carried out absolutely humanely.

      Imagine for a second that the political power is taken away from them in all countries around the world. Then historians get together and document all the historical evidence for all the crimes committed by the tribe for the last 3000 years. And they make their case that there is no other reliable solution. Now the humane technical implementation of the verdict is really simple.

      1. The members of the tribe can marry each other only. No interbreeding with any other race or ethnic group is allowed. Isn’t that what they wanted all this time?
      2. The tribal family can have only one child. And they can have happy life with no restrictions whatsoever. Is that so inhumane? Even today there is such a restriction (or similar) in China if I am not mistaken.
      3. Math known as geometrical regression will take care of the rest in the course of a few generations.

    29. Adam Says:

      Customize a virus and make it less virulent through genetic engineering? Yes, you can. So, too, with the Joo.
      ————-

      Science. 2008 Jun 27;320(5884):1784-7.
      Virus attenuation by genome-scale changes in codon pair bias.

      Coleman JR, Papamichail D, Skiena S, Futcher B, Wimmer E, Mueller S.

      Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.

      Comment in:

      * Science. 2008 Jun 27;320(5884):1709.

      As a result of the redundancy of the genetic code, adjacent pairs of amino acids can be encoded by as many as 36 different pairs of synonymous codons. A species-specific “codon pair bias” provides that some synonymous codon pairs are used more or less frequently than statistically predicted. We synthesized de novo large DNA molecules using hundreds of over-or underrepresented synonymous codon pairs to encode the poliovirus capsid protein. Underrepresented codon pairs caused decreased rates of protein translation, and polioviruses containing such amino acid-independent changes were attenuated in mice. Polioviruses thus customized were used to immunize mice and provided protective immunity after challenge. This “death by a thousand cuts” strategy could be generally applicable to attenuating many kinds of viruses.

    30. Tim McGreen Says:

      A Jew who can be genetically programmed to behave himself? One who can be prevented from inventing any more pyramid schemes or lusting after any more shiksas or making up any more persecution stories or trying to extort any more money from people or who will no longer try to control the banks, the press and academia?

      I’ll believe it when I see it.

    31. alex Says:

      “Across-the-board extermination” is rather poor choice of words

      We exterminate rats and roaches. Jews are worse than rats and roaches. By exterminating them, which can be done peacefully, we are giving them better treatment than they actually deserve. But ‘exterminating’ does lump them in with their fellows.

    32. alex Says:

      1. The members of the tribe can marry each other only. No interbreeding with any other race or ethnic group is allowed. Isn’t that what they wanted all this time?
      2. The tribal family can have only one child. And they can have happy life with no restrictions whatsoever. Is that so inhumane? Even today there is such a restriction (or similar) in China if I am not mistaken.
      3. Math known as geometrical regression will take care of the rest in the course of a few generations.

      Sure, that’s what I mean. There are many non-violent ways to solve the problem. It’s not the same as mass murder, as liars lie.

    33. Z.O.G. Says:

      Forced sterilization would be the most humane and most practical method.

    34. Igor Alexander Says:

      “We have been kind for many centuries – as Z.O.G. has shown above. We have treated jews as just another white competitor. Expel them, defeat them in a fair battle…”

      …emancipate them! (What the hell were we thinking?)

    35. Tim McGreen Says:

      But even if you do get rid of the Jews, you’re still going to have tens of millions of Whites who are infected with JewThink. That means getting rid of Shylock will be only half the battle.

    36. Of No Consequence Says:

      TM:”A Jew who can be genetically programmed to behave himself? One who can be prevented from inventing any more pyramid schemes or lusting after any more shiksas or making up any more persecution stories or trying to extort any more money from people or who will no longer try to control the banks, the press and academia? I’ll believe it when I see it.”

      Jews, especially the Ashkenazim, only became very intelligent and thus very misbehaved in the last 1,000 years or so via their practicing of eugenics amongst themselves, which increased not only the intelligence of Ashkenazi Jewish ethnic stock but also their parasitic Jewish virulence.

      Read the last chapter of Cochran and Harpending’s recent book THE 10,000 EXPLOSION called “Medieval Evolution: How the Ashkenazi Jews Got Their Smarts” – http://the10000yearexplosion.com/medieval-evolutions/ — it took them just a few centuries to evolve their intelligence and Jewish virulence via use of eugenics, but some people here are correct: Jewish intelligence could all be undone rather quickly via genetic engineering, i.e. splicing out the smart genes from ethnic Jews or even deliberately turning them in to retards and/or people with the intelligence of a typical Sub-Saharan, thus rendering them entirely ineffectual as a group, so stupid that they can barely balance a checkbook much less subvert entire White economies.

      I agree with the above commenter ZOG that sterilizing all ethnic Jews who choose to remain in White nations instead of immigrating to Israel (identifying them through mass genetic testing to determine ethnic Jewish ancestry) is far preferable to and easier than exterminating all of them.