14 February, 2009
France Moves Closer to NATO
Posted by Socrates in Afghanistan, France, jewed culture, jewed foreign policy, jewed politics, Jews in government, Kosovo, NATO, Socrates, UN, UN founders at 7:32 pm | 
Permanent Link
Jewish president Nicolas Sarkozy knows that you can’t remake the world without global outfits like NATO, which made the new, Muslim state of Kosovo possible. But NATO – which is basically a military version of the UN – has its limitations, as seen currently in Afghanistan. NATO could be called a Jewish creation, since it sprang from the UN Charter, which was written by the Jewish, U.S. State Department official Leo Pasvolsky:
14 February, 2009 at 10:24 pm
NATO is just another instrument of the Jews. Zionist global tyranny and control requires a massive military force to impose its one world dictatorship.
15 February, 2009 at 1:55 am
The ostensible reason for establishing NATO was to create a deterrent to the USSR and the Warsaw Pact. Both of those boogeymen are long gone, so why the f*ck is NATO still around, except to act as camouflage for US military aggression?
15 February, 2009 at 1:55 am
Also note that the French Finance Minister(the equivalent of our Treasury Secretary) is the scary looking Jewess Christine Lagarde.
http://www.iift.edu/iift/images/crc/untitled1.jpg
15 February, 2009 at 6:01 am
1. How do you know that she’s a Jew?
2. What’s scary-looking about her?
3. You imagine that everyone is a Jew.
4. You’ve cried “wolf” too many times.
5. You’re no longer believable.
6. You’re a troll.
15 February, 2009 at 11:19 am
[url]http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/02kw78I4mO92i/610x.jpg[/url]
@@Hey Ein, try taking a look at the pics here. Christine Lagarde is undoubtedly a jewess.
I agree that sometimes people are called jews here when they are not, but more often are people calling someone out who referred to someone as a jew, then saying, “Where’s your proof, and research?”
Do your research before you call someone out like that.
the pics on the site above show a couple of nice profile shots. The kike nose is unmistakable.
15 February, 2009 at 11:22 am
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/02kw78I4mO92i/610x.jpg
@@Hey Ein, try taking a look at the pics here. Christine Lagarde is undoubtedly a jewess.
I agree that sometimes people are called jews here when they are not, but more often are people calling someone out who referred to someone as a jew, then saying, “Where’s your proof, and research?”
Do your research before you call someone out like that.
the pics on the site above show a couple of nice profile shots. The kike nose is unmistakable.
15 February, 2009 at 11:33 am
http://my2bucks.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/andrea-mitchell.jpg
here’s another
15 February, 2009 at 11:33 am
Sorry, scratch that last one.
15 February, 2009 at 1:55 pm
Ein has a healthy sense of scepticism about unsubstantiated or extraordinary claims being made almost at random by others. That is the kind of scepticism we all need in order to weed out the fever swamp conspiracy theories and the “Here’s a Jew, there’s a Jew” crowd.
15 February, 2009 at 2:19 pm
# Z.O.G. Says:
15 February, 2009 at 1:55 am
Also note that the French Finance Minister(the equivalent of our Treasury Secretary) is the scary looking Jewess Christine Lagarde.
http://www.iift.edu/iift/images/crc/untitled1.jpg
————————————-
She looks like a man. Possible sex change operation? Thin, fleshy face; THICK, dark eyebrows; and the unmistakeably hooked down nose. Side view confirms the beaker posted by 2050.
2050,
Andrea Mitchell is a jew who is married to Alan Greenspan who is also a jew. Don’t know why you retracted.
15 February, 2009 at 2:25 pm
# Zarathustra Says:
15 February, 2009 at 1:55 am
The ostensible reason for establishing NATO was to create a deterrent to the USSR and the Warsaw Pact. Both of those boogeymen are long gone, so why the f*ck is NATO still around, except to act as camouflage for US military aggression?
——————————-
You are a piece of work especially when you think it is convenient to slant things. NATO and the UN are not for US military aggression. They are for Israeli military aggression. That’s why jews get away with invading a country and killing civilians. They also work with AIPAC and since AIPAC controls the US military and the wimps in the White House, it seems they are camouflaged.
15 February, 2009 at 3:51 pm
“we all need in order to weed out the fever swamp conspiracy theories and the “Here’s a Jew, there’s a Jew” crowd.”
“You are a piece of work especially when you think it is convenient to slant things. NATO and the UN are not for US military aggression. They are for Israeli military aggression.”
He attacked those who discussed Freemasonry on another frontpage topic as being “conspiracy theorists” too. That may not be enough on its own but slanting away from jews? My jewdar sense is tingling.
15 February, 2009 at 5:09 pm
Don’t miss the future 2012 Lithium Conference at the U.N.!
Harold Wallace Rosenthal, R.I.P. :
“The United Nations is nothing but a trap-door to the Red World’s immense concentration camp. We pretty much control the U.N.”
“It is an established rule to destroy all members of pre-existing government, their families and relatives, but never Jews. They destroy all members of the police, state police, army officers and their families but never Jews. You see, we know when a government begins to search for the Communists within its borders they are really attempting to uncover Jews in their area. We’er not fooled! The invisible rulers in the Communist countries have a world control over the propaganda and the governments in free countries. We control every media of expression including newspapers, magazines, radio and television. Even your music! We censor the songs released for publication long before they reach the publishers. Before long we will have complete control of your thinking.”
“There will be a forced class warfare here in the United States and many will be liquidated. You will unquestionably be among them. The Jews will not be harmed. I’m not boasting! I’m giving you the facts! And it is too late for your Christian followers to put up a defense. That time is long past. Long, Long Ago we had to become the aggressors!! That is undoubtedly one of our great purposes in life. We are aggressors!! Because you stole your pretended religious beliefs from our Talmud.”
When I asked whether he thought we faced a problem eventually with the Blacks because of their startling population increase he said that the Blacks are helping to serve ‘our purpose’ which might mean several things.
We discussed the Black invasion of city, county and state and their prominence now in television. Also how ridiculous it is for Blacks to become converted to Jews — like Sammy Davis for instance. Mr. R. replied:
“That doesn’t mean anything. We know that a Black cannot become a Jew and that Sammy Davis is still Black. It may have been to his advantage to become converted. In reality he still remains a nigger and not a Jew.”
15 February, 2009 at 5:24 pm
“She looks like a man. Possible sex change operation? Thin, fleshy face; THICK, dark eyebrows; and the unmistakeably hooked down nose. Side view confirms the beaker posted by 2050.”
————
Actually, she looks (in that photo) quite French, that’s all. A lot of French people are funny looking, and she’s not the worst by any means.
I’ll agree that the profile shot is more revealing, but that was not given at first. And a lot of people can have big noses anyway. I do especially note, though, in that same shot Bernanke in the background. That is interesting! More so than her nose.
As far as “doing my research”, the person making the initial aggegation should have been the one to do the research, instead of just presenting a statement with no substantiation whatsoever.
Anyway, I never said she isn’t a Jew (I wouldn’t possibly know!) but only that the claim is not furnished with any proof. (A standard habit from that source, who thinks there’s a Jew under every bed.)
And by the way, I seem to recall that there was a rule announced here a couple of months ago that there would be no further wild, unproven allegations about everybody under the sun being a Jew without some sort of accompanying documentation. After all, just saying something doesn’t make it so.
Right, Socrates?
15 February, 2009 at 5:26 pm
“the person making the initial aggegation should have done the research”
Sorry for the typo. I meant the initial ALLEGATION…
15 February, 2009 at 5:45 pm
It’s been said here before (by others) but it’s worth repeating again, that when someone alleges that there are Jews, Jews, Jews, simply everywhere, hiding behind every lamp post — and that EVERYTHING which happens in the world is caused by Jews — this imputes to them an uncanny, irresistible power that seems super-human. That’s ridiculous. I do not see any point in flattering them that way. They are NOT super-cunning or super-human! Yes, they are behind a lot of things — but not everything.
It serves the purpose of any troll (or lunatic) to say the above stuff, because by claiming that Jews are everywhere and are responsible for everything, then it starts to sound so insane, so ridiculous, that it becomes laughable and nobody is going to give it any further serious attention. Purpose served! Voila! In other words, when everybody’s a Jew, nobody’s a Jew. So you can ignore it. And then they can hide all the better.
15 February, 2009 at 5:56 pm
Re. Zarathustra:
“You are a piece of work especially when you think it is convenient to slant things. NATO and the UN are not for US military aggression. They are for Israeli military aggression. That’s why jews get away with invading a country and killing civilians. ”
———————-
I don’t think Zarathustra meant to “slant things”. I didn’t read it that way. Yes, you’re right that NATO and the UN serve the purpose of Israeli military aggression, but I think he meant that they (and the USA) serve as Israel’s tool in this regard. To much of the world (unfortunately) there is very little distinction seen between them.
Even here at home, Israel tries to present Israel’s interests and well being as the same as America’s interests and well being. They are very careful to equate the two and not to allow any distinction.
I don’t know why you’re constantly after Zarathustra in this way!
15 February, 2009 at 6:19 pm
Tom McReen,
There are a few trolls on this front page and others who are consistent but try to hide as if they are clever, namely Zarathrustra who claims he is male; then we have “gw”; and Ein who likes to be a show off.
“My jewdar sense is tingling.” Your sense is correct. Zara also claimed 9/11 inside job is by a bunch of nutty conspiracy theorists as well. Physics prove timing, demolition explosives, and the video tape of a bunch of jews wannabe Arabs dancing and cheering in the street as the buildings were collapsing. Not to mention information on the internet from people who personally knew that the Mossad working in the CIA planned to bomb the towers as early as 1995. Then you have the psychotic episode of a plane crash into the Pentagon with an invisible aircraft. Some of the interior metal structures were clearly pointing outward not inward. According to the law of physics, that’s impossible.
B’nai B’rith jews look very much like brown-skinned Arabs, which means they can easily pass off as Arabs. I have visually seen these people in their B’nai B’rith office in Nevada. They look very much like the dark Arabs with their slightly hooked nose and medium brown skin. False-flag operations indeed are easily carried out.
15 February, 2009 at 7:37 pm
Ein Says: “And by the way, I seem to recall that there was a rule announced here a couple of months ago that there would be no further wild, unproven allegations about everybody under the sun being a Jew without some sort of accompanying documentation. After all, just saying something doesn’t make it so.
Right, Socrates?”
Now that you mention it, I seem to recall Alex mentioning a rule of “no wild or false accusations” or similar words.
15 February, 2009 at 8:12 pm
Right, Socrates?”
Now that you mention it, I seem to recall Alex mentioning a rule of “no wild or false accusations” or similar words.
——————————————
Thank you! I remember it most definitely. It was pretty clear and forceful. Yes, it was about a couple of months ago. (Maybe a little more more.) I think it might have been in regard to some actor. Or other well known name. Can’t think of the name just now.
The speculations about everybody who was a potential Jew (you would think about 99% of the world!) had simply gotten out of hand at that point, thus making all solid, factual information equally suspect. It’s like deliberately tossing pebbles in with the diamonds to discredit them all. It’s simply a case of calling “wolf” too often. It serves no purpose except to cause damage and confusion and discredit the truth when there is truth.
I recall you had stepped in on one occasion to say that the painter David was not a Jew, so this rule came a bit before that.
15 February, 2009 at 9:23 pm
jews indeed did 9/11.
“B’nai B’rith jews look very much like brown-skinned Arabs, which means they can easily pass off as Arabs. I have visually seen these people in their B’nai B’rith office in Nevada.”
True. I have a photo which demonstrates that very point – one White looking, one Arab-looking. I may even post it on the forum, when my forum account gets fully activated (hint, hint).
15 February, 2009 at 10:24 pm
@Coup d’Etat Says:
“2050,
Andrea Mitchell is a jew who is married to Alan Greenspan who is also a jew. Don’t know why you retracted.”
I thought I had another pic of Christine Lagarde, so that’s what I meant. Didn’t want anyone to think I was trying to pass off that scary looking jewess as CL.
Certainly there are plenty of shabbos goyim who are tripping over each other trying to come up with the kind of liberal/NWO/jewy kind of stuff the jews are so good at. But for gentiles, it’s more of a Skinner Box reaction to programming, (you know, help pass a gun control law and be praised in the media etc.)with jews, it’s for a more sinister reason.
16 February, 2009 at 4:48 am
There should be no doubt at all that Sarkozy has entrusted the most important ministry of ANY government to a person having his absolute confidence. Jews know about the power of money and importance of money control.
If that woman is not Jewish, what qualifications did she bring along that Sarkozy appointed her? (There are no female freemasons!)
16 February, 2009 at 12:33 pm
SHUT UP EIN!
We people here have been around and studied the behavior of jews and know what they look like in conjunction with their behaviors for a long time.
Just because you don’t know how or is denying it so, doesn’t mean we should follow in your footsteps or believe your interpretation of what a jew is or what a jew is not. How do we know you are not trying to deny what a jew looks like or what a jew does or doesn’t do? Works both ways, Ein.
You have a problem with us pointing out the jew, don’t post here. Get out! We do this for educational purposes and share ideas not to berate the other for believing the jews are the biggest problem in the world, which they are. Some of us, including myself have had personal dealings with jews. My dealings with them were always negative, and it wasn’t the way I treated them. I was naive at the time and didn’t know they were jews until years later.
So SHUT UP and GO SOMEWHERE ELSE!
16 February, 2009 at 12:52 pm
Arminius Says:
16 February, 2009 at 4:48 am
“There should be no doubt at all that Sarkozy has entrusted the most important ministry of ANY government to a person having his absolute confidence. Jews know about the power of money and importance of money control.”
How many people out there do you think are naive about jews? How many people out there know how sneaky a jew can be? If people don’t know what a jew looks like or how it manipulates, how can one stop them? I am convinced it is not just about money and how they control or become a controller, it is how they fly under the radar while the White naive Christians give them a free pass without critiquing their motives that allows them to progress and has allowed them to progress.
16 February, 2009 at 3:07 pm
Merçi flemmard! Thank you very much for your vindication.
Well, well! So I was right. So she’s not a Jew after all.
Scary looking? Mannish? Sex change operation? Oh, please!!!
We were being misled. The paranoid schizophrenics were wrong all along .
They serve no useful purpose here by posting false and misleading information.
A good percentage of the world’s Jews could walk right past Coup de Grace and she/he wouldn’t even notice. She thinks she knows Jews because she saw some at the ADL office! So that makes her an expert. Pathetic!
One has to wonder — can anyone REALLY be that stupid? Or that crazy?
Or could they have some deeper, hidden purpose? Are they perhaps stupid like foxes? Who knows? I don’t know what makes them tick. There’s no explaining crazyness.
16 February, 2009 at 3:27 pm
Let me add here, to make it very clear, that I have nothing against identifying who is a Jew.
But what we need here is ACCURATE information, not insane speculations, and MIS-information!
16 February, 2009 at 3:58 pm
flemtard: “Coup d’Etat and Captainchaos are bigoted psychopaths from MajorityRights, here to impose on us their Salterian vision of our future, which they and Guessedworker are dutifully at work ‘constructing’ for us.”
LOL! Frank Salter, himself, looks to justify protection of a given ethny’s ethnic genetic interests on utilitarian grounds, and seeks to render the means to that end consistent with classical liberalism. Guessedworker is even against anti-miscegenation laws.
I’m for the pro-natalist program adopted by the National Socialists where they gave home loans to young married couples, one fourth of which was forgiven for each child born. It was effective in increasing the fertility rate; by way of supplementation, I’m in favor of DNA testing for the prospective couples so that we get what we are paying for, White children.
Anyone who will not even look at some of the very successful technocratic methods of protecting the racial stock utilized by the National Socialists is really not serious about preserving the White race.
“Always keyed up. Always ready to second-guess and point the finger. At bottom, the kind of personality that wants nothing more than a loaded gun and a “traitor” on his knees.”
Calm down, flemwad. I’m not the one on the verge of hysteria, pulling my hair out, trembling over the impending fury of the “bigots.” Take a Valium or something, Jesus Christ.
16 February, 2009 at 4:06 pm
flemmard,
Since you think you are so psychologically right in categorizing people, even myself — LOL — how did your people vote in a jew?
Thought for the day — What’s accurate for a jew is quite opposite to one who can recognize a jew. Jews have for hundreds of years illicitly disguised themselves and lied a trillion times, equivalent to the U.S.’s deficit situation.
16 February, 2009 at 4:12 pm
flemmard Says: “VNNers habitually call “Jews” whomever they disagree with or just don’t like. Socrates has done it a number of times. It’s endemic to this “movement”, and the more you try to be level-headed, the harder the finger swings back pointing at you, instead.”
Whoa, there, flemmy. For someone who just showed up at VNN, you sure are an “expert” on what I’ve written, aren’t you? Now you’ve just discredited anything I’ve written about Jews. Very clever.
As far as I know, I’ve only had to make one retraction re: a person who MAY NOT have been a Jew after all. That was maybe 9 months ago. I’m usually pretty careful about checking my facts before posting.
But I’ll tell you what: give me concrete examples of “a number of times” when I’ve called people Jews who weren’t Jews. Give good sources of proof that I was wrong in calling them Jews.
16 February, 2009 at 4:13 pm
“Always ready to second-guess and point the finger.”
Who is ready to point the finger?
Another thought for the day — When the truth gets a little too hot for the jews, they start to fly off the handle like a rabid dog.
16 February, 2009 at 4:18 pm
Einstein said:
A good percentage of the world’s Jews could walk right past Coup de Grace and she/he wouldn’t even notice. She thinks she knows Jews because she saw some at the ADL office! So that makes her an expert. Pathetic!
One has to wonder — can anyone REALLY be that stupid? Or that crazy?
Or could they have some deeper, hidden purpose? Are they perhaps stupid like foxes? Who knows? I don’t know what makes them tick. There’s no explaining crazyness.
————————————–
I can imagine how the jews react when Palestinians increase their numbers on the Gaza border. The jews go rabid!
16 February, 2009 at 4:24 pm
I think there ought to be a move called, “The Jews Go Rabid!” Hell, if the naughty jews want to make movies about girls, I think a better movie/movies can be made.
16 February, 2009 at 4:43 pm
“I think a better movie/movies can be made.”
Who cares what you think about anything, you dumb cunt?
16 February, 2009 at 4:50 pm
I don’t understand what flemmard was getting at in his reference to Capt. Chaos and Socrates. Nor to MR. I distance myself from that, knowing nothing about it. Also, let me say that I regret that I said some French people are “funny looking”. That was unkind and I should not have said it. I apologize. Actually, Mme. Lagarde is not funny looking at all. She is just a typical middle-aged Frenchwoman, no different from millions of others.
How did she get into all of this, anyway???
I thought the article was about Sarkozy — who DEFINITELY has Jewish features. Let’s go after the Jews and not get sidetracked going after the non-Jews.
16 February, 2009 at 5:19 pm
Flemmard is a flamer.
16 February, 2009 at 5:53 pm
The Harold Wallace Rosenthal interview seems distant but relevant enough.
Do y’all know much about hexagrams and pentagrams and Azoth?
http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/
16 February, 2009 at 6:00 pm
Do you mean he is a Fleming?
But he is from the South of France!
:)
16 February, 2009 at 6:36 pm
“VNNers habitually call “Jews” whomever they disagree with or just don’t like. Socrates has done it a number of times.
I have not noticed this. But certainly others were guilty of the practice. There may be some confusion. In defense of Socrates, let me quote this little exchange that I found, in which he expresses disapproval of inaccuracies. I am sure there have been other occasions, but I am not good at using the Search feature.
- – - – - – - – - – - – - –
zoomcopter Says: 25 November, 2008 at 12:41 pm
I think it’s important to have accurate information regarding Jewish identity. One error disqualifies the entire list of Jews in the eyes of most critical readers…Therefore, we must always deal in facts which can be verified. If a Jew can prove one error in our theory of Jewish domination, the theory gets flushed down the toilet without any further critical thought.
Socrates Says: 25 November, 2008 at 1:01 pm
Yes, zoomcopter. I am not sure whether some of the other people picked by Obama are Jews or not.
16 February, 2009 at 7:23 pm
Thanks, Ein. The poster flemmtroll is a well-known shit-stirrer who must – for psychological reasons it seems – return to VNN again and again, under different screennames (e.g., “anti,” “yeeuh” “r,” “laughing”), in order to toss spit-wads – but not at first. That always comes later, after a week or two. She (he?) thinks she’s very intellectual and sophisticated – maybe that’s why she picked “France” as her “location.”
16 February, 2009 at 8:11 pm
I like the azure U.N. helmets. If they could just balance the budget!
16 February, 2009 at 8:28 pm
My rule is that every politician/public figure of importance/decision maker is a Jew until their actions prove otherwise.
Someone may not be Jewish by blood but if they carry out Zionist policy for me they are jews and deserve the same fate as their kike masters.
16 February, 2009 at 11:19 pm
John Says:
“My rule is that every politician/public figure of importance/decision maker is a Jew until their actions prove otherwise.
Someone may not be Jewish by blood but if they carry out Zionist policy for me they are jews”
—————————-
Well now, that’s an interesting point of view. And I have no problem with it, so long as you understand who is who. It’s sort of like knowing who are the Jew-helpers, and who are the real “insiders”.
Or it’s like saying that there are servants who work in the palace, but other people are the royal family. They’re not the same! Hardly. A shabbos goy may serve the Jews, but is not a Jew. And he never will be. Not in the eyes of the Jews, he certainly isn’t. (Although they may let him think so.)
18 February, 2009 at 6:43 pm
Christine Lagarde (born 1 January 1956) is the current Minister of Finance of France, appointed in June 2007.
- She was previously Minister of Agriculture and Fishing and Minister of Trade in the government of Dominique de Villepin.
-Lagarde is the first woman ever to become finance minister of a G8 economy.
- Prior to her appointment as Minister of Finance, Lagarde was ranked the 30th most powerful woman in the world by Forbes Magazine.
-A noted antitrust and labour lawyer, Lagarde made history as the first female chairman of the international law firm Baker & McKenzie.
- She has been awarded France’s highest honor, the Légion d’honneur.
- Lagarde was born in Paris as Christine Lallouette to academic parents.
- She studied at the Law School of University of Paris X: Nanterre. She later lectured there after graduating. She also has a post-graduate diploma (DESS) in labour law, and a Master’s degree in English.
- Lagarde worked as an intern at the United States Capitol, as William Cohen’s congressional assistant.
Talk about a TJB biography! This combined with her extremely grotesque Jewish appearance seals the deal. You guys who are saying that she isn’t Jewish are out of your minds.
Oh, and the name “Lalouette” is contained in the Avotaynu Consolidated Jewish Surname Index. Lalouette means “the lark”.
Soundex:
883000
Name:
LALOUETTE
Databases:
Z
Check, and mate.
18 February, 2009 at 7:01 pm
Nice try though, guys. Better luck next time.
;-)
18 February, 2009 at 7:57 pm
“- Lagarde worked as an intern at the United States Capitol, as William Cohen’s congressional assistant.”
Has anybody her ever worked for a Jew? I have. Most of us have. That didn’t make us Jews!
Also, the name Christine is extremely unlikely for a Jew.
Baker & McKenzie doesn’t sound like a Jewish law firm either. (There are some gentile ones, after all.)
The only thing you found is that she once worked for a Jew.
I remain unconvinced. I just don’t know.
18 February, 2009 at 7:58 pm
I meant, “Has anybody HERE ever worked for a Jew?” Sorry.
18 February, 2009 at 8:05 pm
PS. Where did you find that “Avotaynu Consolidated Jewish Surname Index”? Sounds very interesting. Could be very helpful.
But I assume they record every name that any Jew anywhere ever had. Right? Just because some Jew somewhere used a certain name doesn’t mean it’s a “Jewish name”. I once knew a Jew named Smith. Does that mean that everybody named Smith is automatically a Jew?
18 February, 2009 at 8:12 pm
“Also, the name Christine is extremely unlikely for a Jew.”
Perhaps she is another jewish name-changer. . .
18 February, 2009 at 10:09 pm
“Perhaps she is another jewish name-changer. . .”
Could be. Not impossible. But in that case, I would have to assume that she has, essentially, turned away from Judaism. I can’t imagine that any observant Jew would have a name with “Christ” in it. Thus, I said it seems extremely unlikely.
My point being that if a Jew takes the name of Robert or Sally, it is no offense to Judaism. But Christopher or Christine would be quite another thing.
18 February, 2009 at 10:22 pm
That was intended as levyty, as most change last names.
I had an email exchange with gottfried, suggesting that jonah goldberg’s real name was rube, and that he was “another jewish name changer.” Gottfried cracked up.
19 February, 2009 at 12:55 am
“That was intended as levyty, as most change last names.”
I see. Well, now I kahn understand what jew were getting at.
19 February, 2009 at 3:22 pm
Give it up, gw. Christine Lallouette is a Jewess.
Check this out. I can’t find the name “Lallouette” in any online database of surnames. The ONLY place I found this name was in the Avotaynu Consolidated Jewish Surname Index. So this means that “Lallouette” is an obscure Jewish French surname that is only had by a couple of Jews living in France.
;-)
19 February, 2009 at 3:26 pm
Nicholas Sarkozy is a self-proclaimed “Roman Catholic”, and so is Christina Lallouette(Lagarde). So much for your theory, huh? ;-)
19 February, 2009 at 5:28 pm
IN an interview Nicolas Sarkozy gave in 2004, he expressed an extraordinary understanding of the plight of the Jewish people for a home: “Should I remind you the visceral attachment of every Jew to Israel, as a second mother homeland? There is nothing outrageous about it. Every Jew carries within him a fear passed down through generations, and he knows that if one day he will not feel safe in his country, there will always be a place that would welcome him. And this is Israel.”
“Sarkozy’s sympathy and understanding is most probably a product of his upbringing it is well known that Sarkozy’s mother was born to the Mallah family, one of the oldest Jewish families of Salonika, Greece.”
http://www.ajn.com.au/news/news.asp?pgID=3162
19 February, 2009 at 5:41 pm
Zog,
To rationalize with trolls like gw, Ein, and Miss & Mr. Zara is like rationalizing with psychopaths. They will also state the last names, “Smith” or “Myers” or “Johnson” can’t be surnames of a jew. That’s the sort of mentality they have. Lie, lie, and lie again.
Jews: “Flying under the radar.”
19 February, 2009 at 11:56 pm
Coup d’Etat,
Are you saying that Zarathustra is a female? Now that you mention it, I HAVE noticed that “his” writing style is very feminine. Interesting.
20 February, 2009 at 12:59 am
“Coup d’Etat,
Are you saying that Zarathustra is a female? Now that you mention it, I HAVE noticed that “his” writing style is very feminine. Interesting.”
OMG! Like, you are such a TOTAL bitch! Ewwww!
20 February, 2009 at 2:18 pm
Hey, Zar.
Have you decided whether you’re British or American yet? Just last week you said that your father attended a very exclusive private school in New York City where MOST of the students were Jewish. Oh, and you said that your mother dated “several” Jewish guys when she was younger.
LOL :-D
23 February, 2009 at 5:21 pm
Anyone who has lived in New York, as I have, knows that you’re going to have Jewish neighbors and Jewish schoolmates. That`s inevitable. And the better and more espensive the school, the more Jews it will have. So what? What does that have to do with Zara’s father?
As for his mother dating some Jewish guys when she was young, that’s not the least uncommon either, especially in New York where you’re surrounded with jews. Big deal! A lot of people, like my own parents, haven’t a clue about Jews. That’s very common. So leave his parents out of it!
It´s difficult enough accessing this site, without coming here to read this kind of personal abuse and garbage.
As usual, you`re dealing in allegations, distortions, and personal slander, instead of with facts and reason. You NEVER have any documentation or facts about anything! Only allegations and insinuations. Your only motive is to disrupt and sow dissention. It is quite clear what you are doing here! You and Miss Etat, the two of you. Frankly, I don’t understand why this site allows it.
23 February, 2009 at 6:00 pm
THE KWA
If it weren’t
so clueless
It would be
so jewless
BUMMA SHAVE
23 February, 2009 at 7:45 pm
Brother Shabazz, keep the haiku coming!
And thank you, herr Ein. People who always resort to ad hominem attacks and baseless accusations instead of STICKING TO THE FACTS should be discouraged from posting here, IMO. I just thought I’d share an anecdote or two about my own family’s experiences with The Tribe. One must always be extremely cautious when dealing with those people. They don’t even trust or like each other, for crissakes.
25 February, 2009 at 6:03 am
People who always resort to ad hominem attacks and baseless accusations instead of STICKING TO THE FACTS should be discouraged from posting here, IMO.
————–
In my opiñioñ too. They ñeed to resort resort to ad hominem attacks instead of facts because they don’t have any facts.