20 February, 2009
Walt Rostow: King of Vietnam War Policy
Posted by Socrates in jewed foreign policy, jewed politics, Jewish warmongering, Socrates, Vietnam War, war, war as a racket at 12:16 am | 
Permanent Link
Warmongering: it’s a Jewish specialty, and Rostow’s involvement in Vietnam policy-making is a fine example of it. How many dead, White men would be alive today without Rostow’s significant influence on Vietnam policy? Rostow’s brother, Eugene, was also involved with Vietnam policy, but to a lesser degree:
A book about Rostow: [Here].
20 February, 2009 at 1:56 am
Generally speaking, Jews did not support either the Korean or Vietnam Wars, since neither conflict threatened The Self-Chosen Ones or their little gangster state in Occupied Palestine.
How many Jewish “comedians” or editorial cartoonists ever made fun of Ho Chi Minh or Kim Il-Sung the way they made fun of Saddam, the Kaiser, Hitler, Mussolini and Tojo? How many Jewish pro-war demonstrations were held in support of the Korean and Vietnam Wars in the streets of NYC or Washington? How many NY Times editorials supported the bombing of Hanoi or bombing the Ho Chi Minh Trail in Cambodia, or MaCarthur’s plan to push the Chink army back into Red China? They all sure liked it when Baghdad, Dresden and Hamburg got firebombed, though.
20 February, 2009 at 5:42 am
I had no idea that these two top policy makers were jews. Thanks for pointing this out.
Just goes to show all jews are assholes…
20 February, 2009 at 8:36 am
“a whirlwind of supreme self-confidence, talkative to the point of verbosity, certain of the moral rectitude of his positions and unwavering in the face of criticism, even as doubts about the wisdom of the Vietnam War grew in Johnson’s inner circle. . . ”
This is why I think Jews are related to Blacks (a recent article on this website shows that Jews are closer to Blacks, geneticallly, than Whites are).
This sounds so much like Obama, that it is frightening.
That dumbass Johnson. God, how I hated that bastard.
He is the one who spent trillions of our money on a useless war and a fantasy “Great Society.”
I still remember the “welfare queens” paying for choice steaks and celery hearts with their food stamps, and how mad the Whites would get who had to pay with hard-earned honest cash!
20 February, 2009 at 3:08 pm
Yet more influential jews I’ve never heard about. Under every rock…
20 February, 2009 at 4:51 pm
As an ex-man-o’-war from Africa (from way back in the good old days) it’s always depressing to read of white men being used as cannon-fodder. All my friends are dead. But hey, it’s a-Friday night! – no need to be les miserables… so here’s a special message from my alter-ego, Prince Vulcan Bubu II (my pet green iguana whom I left behind in South Africa when I ducked the place – and still in GOOD white hands, I hope) – “Any man with a white skin currently alive upon this planet who does not know who he’s fighting for, who does not know his enemy… DESERVES to die – for the SUPREME crime of STUPIDITY!” (nuff said)
I have NO sympathy for useful idiots.
20 February, 2009 at 5:30 pm
DESERVE (f*ck Oxford dictionary version, this is mine) DE-SERVE: to UNDERserve; to serve UNDER, LOWER, BENEATH your human potential…
F*CK useful idiots: they deserve to die – oxygen thieves… ALL of them: black, white, green, yellow…
You got it.
20 February, 2009 at 6:00 pm
And the same goes for WOMB-men.
20 February, 2009 at 9:11 pm
The above statements are AXIOMATIC, they are FINAL. Okay? Get my drift? I’ve heard ENOUGH about this and that… alrightee gentleMEN???? Good. Let US move onto the next level…
Start preparing.
(case rested)
20 February, 2009 at 9:23 pm
uh. (sorry) duh. You got it. *bling-bling!*
Jackpot white man jack-fucking–pot!
Bingo-bingo-fuck-em!
* * *
This is OUR world!!!
20 February, 2009 at 9:24 pm
FYI, everybody.
Lyndon Johnson was himself a Jew, and he had been working on behalf of Jews and World Zionism ever since he was a young man.
20 February, 2009 at 9:25 pm
O-U-R WORLD…
20 February, 2009 at 9:29 pm
What?
20 February, 2009 at 10:00 pm
Fuck ‘em all America… you bin jewed for 200 years… we ALL know about THAT. (duh – FFSKS! can we move on now….?)
20 February, 2009 at 10:01 pm
Z.O.G. Says: “Lyndon Johnson was himself a Jew…”
This is news to me. Got some proof?
20 February, 2009 at 10:06 pm
Let us not become construed in dialectics that are of no avail… please solutions… or at least – solutions of greater import matter more. Eh?
21 February, 2009 at 12:09 am
“Lyndon Johnson’s maternal ancestors, the Huffmans, apparently migrated to Frederick, Maryland from Germany sometime in the mid-eighteenth century. Later they moved to Bourbon, Kentucky and eventually settled in Texas in the mid-to-late nineteenth century.10
According to Jewish law, if a person’s mother is Jewish, then that person is automatically Jewish, regardless of the father’s ethnicity or religion. The facts indicate that both of Lyndon Johnson’s great-grandparents, on the maternal side, were Jewish. These were the grandparents of Lyndon’s mother, Rebecca Baines.11 Their names were John S. Huffman and Mary Elizabeth Perrin.12 John Huffman’s mother was Suzanne Ament, a common Jewish name. Perrin is also a common Jewish name.
Huffman and Perrin had a daughter, Ruth Ament Huffman,13 who married Joseph Baines14 and together they had a daughter, Rebekah Baines,15 Lyndon Johnson’s mother. The line of Jewish mothers can be traced back three generations in Lyndon Johnson’s family tree. There is little doubt that he was Jewish.
To recap, the following is Lyndon Johnson’s maternal family tree:
Mother: Rebekah Baines (married Sam Johnson, Lyndon’s father)
Maternal grandparents: Ruth Ament Huffman and Joseph Baines
Maternal great-grandparents (parents of Ruth Huffman): Mary Elizabeth Perrin and John S. Huffman, III
Maternal great-great grandparents (parents of Mary Perrin): Dicea Kerby and William Perrin16 (Footnote 20)
Maternal great-great grandparents (parents of John Huffman, III): Suzanne Ament and John S. Huffman, II17
Maternal great-great-great grandparents (parents of John Huffman, II): Cathrine Lyter and John Huffman18″
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/johnson's_hidden_loyalties.htm#Secret Ethnicity
21 February, 2009 at 12:13 am
Try a different link:
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/johnson_highlights.htm
21 February, 2009 at 1:32 am
shabbos s. shabazz:
LBJ had Jewish roots? Interesting. Thanks.
21 February, 2009 at 2:06 am
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p=886796#post886796
Post “13″
21 February, 2009 at 2:10 am
The Vietnam War was a heroic fight against Communism. Hail the fallen.
21 February, 2009 at 7:32 am
I can’t believe how gullible you are, Socrates. Some dubious geneology regarding LBJ’s family tree is posted here and you believe it without hesitation? The real Socrates would have dialogued and dialected such an assertion to pieces.
21 February, 2009 at 7:40 am
“The Vietnam War was a heroic fight against Communism. Hail the fallen.”
I’m afraid that’s not quite true, sir. LBJ had to appear “tough on Communism” in order to beat right-wing Jew Barry Goldwater in the ’64 presidential campaign, so he made up some bullshit about a Navy gunboat being attacked by the VC in the Gulf of Tonkin. That whole damn Vietnam War was based on lies, just like the current unwinnable wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
21 February, 2009 at 10:21 am
Excuse me, but the SOB Communists were running things here, especially the media and most Regime Colleges.
21 February, 2009 at 10:40 am
Zara:
The Greek philosopher Diogenes would have simply squatted and defecated, as he was famous for.
21 February, 2009 at 11:14 am
Zarathustra Says: “I can’t believe how gullible you are, Socrates. Some dubious geneology regarding LBJ’s family tree is posted here and you believe it without hesitation? The real Socrates would have dialogued and dialected such an assertion to pieces.”
I had not visited that URL link until just now…granted, that isn’t proof…
21 February, 2009 at 11:32 am
J. de Nugent had a long (they are all long, aren’t they) post on vnnforum about LBJ aka “Bullshit Johnson”.
21 February, 2009 at 11:49 am
I provided the link, it ain’t proof and wasn’t offered as proof.
It’z a probability issue- he probably was.
21 February, 2009 at 12:44 pm
Here, jews discuss Madoff (Commentary Magazine):
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/the-madoff-scandal-and-the-future-of-american-jewry-14640
Soc- how do we submit links (other than this way)?
21 February, 2009 at 1:33 pm
LBJ = sephardic crypto-jew.
There’s an anecdote of it being said that he looked a bit like Barry Goldwater. When he was asked about it he gave some kind of smug, knowing “wink wink” answer.
That and he was recruited by jewish lawyers and B’nai B’rith types early on.
21 February, 2009 at 2:31 pm
Lyndon B. Johnson
– A Righteous Gentile
In recognition of Lyndon Johnson’s efforts to save European Jewry as Hitler’s noose tightened around their necks in the 1930s.
We invite scholars and survivors to submit historical accounts of LBJ’s actions. We will present the data to Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial with the recommendation that they officially recognize LBJ as a Righteous Gentile
http://lyndonjohnsonandisrael.blogspot.com/
This site details the enormous support from LBJ for jews.
Who was commander-in-chief during the Liberty attack?
21 February, 2009 at 4:23 pm
What does it matter whether Johnson was Jew or not? It is certain that he supported Jewish interests, particularly in the domestic sphere, but so what? So has every other President since.
Shabbos goyim are always more than willing to do their masters’ dirty work. For example: Hubert H. Humphrey was no Jew, but his policies were just as philosemitic, pinko, damaging to White EGI and clueless as Johnson’s. He would’ve been worse, possibly.
My belief is that Johnson’s damaging policy came from his incompetence, not from a warped Jewish psyche. Altho’ by all accounts, he was a big jerk…
21 February, 2009 at 5:32 pm
And don’t forget Robert F. Kennedy, with his twinkling Irish eyes. He got some rough justice from an Arab for his slavish support of Israel and his shameful tookas-kissing of Jewish voters. The Jews and liberals still miss him even more than they miss his older brother Jack.
21 February, 2009 at 6:38 pm
The tribe was involved with ol’ JFK having his brains put on display in Dallas. “Final Judgment” convinced me of this, after having read just about every other book on the assassination of the number one Cherry Popper in Presidential History. I don’t think the tribe misses Jack at all. After he was offed by “special interests” working together, they were able to use a carefully crafted, false image of him as one more of their tools to destroy the US. Blowing his brains out endowed them with a plethora of tools and gifts. As for LBJ being a kike, it is amusing to look at pictures of him and Golda Meir together. They look like twins. But beyond the humor, Israeli Minister Ephraim Evron and LBJ advisor made remarks to the effect of LBJ having more than a few “…Jewish corpuscles,” in his blood, as did others. I wouldn’t doubt he was at least part tribal, hell, look at he and his wife, who was also rumored to be jewish. LBJ ran against Goldwater, another from a family of ‘converts’ from judaism (a la John Kerry), and Goldwater may have been the candidate designed to lose, just like McCain today.
Love him or hate him, JFK was “in with the jews”, but he had the temerity to believe he was in charge, and that was his undoing. Rostow and others couldn’t have a fucking goy telling them what to do, never mind other interests (not all jews of course) who were pissed at what Kennedy was up to. Shit, other goys might get the same idea and then the tribe would have to work overtime just to get things straight again. So the public execution was set – for the benefit of other pols who might ideas – and after that, jew tool or jew in genes LBJ did everything the tribe wanted from snivel rights to immigration, and kikes like Rostow were able to do whatever they wanted, no doubt rubbing one out each night when the American death toll was announced by ZOG tool Walter Cronkite on the evening news.
Sure, shabbos goys do the work of their jew benefactors. Those are the people who got them there in the first place – and they want to keep enjoying the fun, the money, indulging in their perversions (jews generally make sure their tools are “blackmailable”, usually sexually). That’s why HHH was such a piece of shit. Same with almost everyone else with any perceived power in DC since the mid 60′s. Our people’s main problem is that so many whites in politics will sell out their own kind for fun NOW, instead of looking down the road at what their doing to their own people. That’s why a whole new system, whatever it is, must be put in place once we’re back in charge of our county, our destiny.
We need whites, fighting among each other or not, directing our countries. Not a bunch of kike interlopers giggling and laughing as they use us, use us up, and have a great time as we go down the drain and their resources grow, fueled from our toil, blood and bones.
21 February, 2009 at 11:45 pm
LBJ looks like the fraternal twin of Golda Meier.
All the circumstantial evidence suggests that he was a deep cover crypto.
21 February, 2009 at 11:47 pm
A friend in deed
By LENNY BEN-DAVID
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1220802296358&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
22 February, 2009 at 3:40 pm
Chances that LBJ had any jew ancestry are slim and none.
22 February, 2009 at 3:54 pm
Bullshit, old_dutch. LBJ was probably AT LEAST 50% genetically Jewish.
Stick that in your yarmulke and smoke it.
;-)
22 February, 2009 at 4:35 pm
All LBJs are assholes. Are all assholes LBJ?
22 February, 2009 at 8:53 pm
Big Effer Says:
21 February, 2009 at 6:38 pm
The tribe was involved with ol’ JFK having his brains put on display in Dallas. “Final Judgment” convinced me of this, after having read just about every other book on the assassination of the number one Cherry Popper in Presidential History. I don’t think the tribe misses Jack at all. After he was offed by “special interests” working together, they were able to use a carefully crafted, false image of him as one more of their tools to destroy the US. Blowing his brains out endowed them with a plethora of tools and gifts. As for LBJ being a kike, it is amusing to look at pictures of him and Golda Meir together. They look like twins. But beyond the humor, Israeli Minister Ephraim Evron and LBJ advisor made remarks to the effect of LBJ having more than a few “…Jewish corpuscles,” in his blood, as did others. I wouldn’t doubt he was at least part tribal, hell, look at he and his wife, who was also rumored to be jewish. LBJ ran against Goldwater, another from a family of ‘converts’ from judaism (a la John Kerry), and Goldwater may have been the candidate designed to lose, just like McCain today.
HEY! Big F-er Thanks for the post.
Now listen up Pilgrims, LBJ Quacked like a duck, walked liked a like a duck, and got my bretheren offed in a Phucked up war.
Whether he was a enemy alien or not, he worked 1000000% agains the White race.
Any one who says different is an NKVD agent or a sophist.
Thank you.
22 February, 2009 at 8:57 pm
You better believe Mikey Savage Dildo head read here and perhaps are the majority of readers. Believe it.
22 February, 2009 at 9:59 pm
I am inclined to agree. Almost all of the presidents since FDR were either passive or active Zionists and all sucked.
Truman – Idiot hostility w/ Korea “Red Scare” bullshit (the whole paranoid Cold War business being a front to legitimize Yankee-Judaea’s Military-Industrial-Parliamentary-Educational-etc Matrix and Social Darwinist Imperial Capitalism).
Eisenhauer – Actively supported the Yid. Enforced school integration with the military, the turncoat. Mass murdered Germans and other Axis allies in WWII thus a war criminal.
Kennedy – Idiot who got into not one but two near-apocalypse situations with the USSR. Supercharged liberalism in the US of course serving Big Yid’s interests.
Johnson – Covered. Took Kennedy’s nonsense into hyperspeed. Botched the ‘Nam War. Signed Snivel Rights. Bullied those who opposed his viewpoints. Took part in the creation of the present economic crisis (look up FNMA – Fannie Mae it was a post-Depression bailout itself). All around bad guy.
Nixon – Knew what a threat the Jews were, but helped them anyway. Eased the tension with the Communist nations and ended Vietnam – but his paranoid domestic agenda overstepped the bounds and got him ousted.
Ford – Well, his two chiefs of staff were, respectively, Donald Rumsfeld and Richard Cheney, the two Shabbos goyim extraordinaire. That was the sort of company he kept.
Carter – Inept foreign policy, bungled domestic policy, and a sickeningly self-righteous posture. Contrary to ideas that he was a socialist, he was in fact pro-corporate and believed in deregulation and free-trade, i.e. he implicitly supported Yid interests.
Reagan – The Rise of the Neocons. Righteous cold warrior who gleefully preaches the good word of American capitalism and international war against “red foes.” Actively supported homegrown Zionists as well as the Israeli Zionists. But he didn’t trust Jews himself and froze them out of his inner circle – the irony!
Bush I – Ugh. The Iraq fiasco? The savings and loan garbage? The USA’s shift into hyperdebt? A crypto-Jew for certain.
Clinton – Globalist Golden Boy. A master international crook, meddler, and murderer. He is smart enough to hide his true nature: A ruthless, grasping psychopath with that nasty combination of filthy lucre-worship and rank ambition. An unequivocal supporter of all things Yid.
Bush II – Ugh. The Iraq fiasco? The economic crash? The USA’s shift into hyper-hyper-hyperdebt? Truly a disaster on many dimensions, but some of those may benefit us.
Obama – Oy vey, I can’t take anymore.
Were any of the above even close to good? This country has been fucked for a long time.
23 February, 2009 at 12:37 am
The son of a Socialist immigrant who named him for the poet Walt Whitman, Mr. Rostow graduated from Yale at 19, won a Rhodes scholarship, served as a major in the Army’s covert Office of Strategic Services in World War II, then pursued a brilliant career as a scholar of economic modernization and an adviser to politicians. He coined Kennedy’s 1960 campaign slogan, “Let’s Get This Country Moving Again.”
But it was his relentless support of American military intervention in Southeast Asia, first as a White House and State Department official in the Kennedy administration and then as Johnson’s national security adviser at the height of the Vietnam War, that marked him for life.
Un-quote
IMO JFK would not play ball with them on their bandit state and more, and they ventilated his head. Then suddenly our policies changed over night and with three years the http://www.ussliberty.org was criminally assaulted.
23 February, 2009 at 1:34 am
I hereby declare LBJ “GUILTY” of the crime of crypto-kikery.
:-D
23 February, 2009 at 1:35 am
FYI, everybody.
Eisenhower was a Jew also. He was half Jewish.
23 February, 2009 at 1:38 am
Oh, and before all of you clowns question what I say, take a look at this image. Read the first sentence of the first paragraph. ;-)
http://judicial-inc.biz/Hopie_5.jpg
23 February, 2009 at 1:39 am
And then read the rest this page:
http://judicial-inc.biz/Hopie_ike.htm
23 February, 2009 at 2:40 am
Zarathustra said: “How many Jewish “comedians” or editorial cartoonists ever made fun of Ho Chi Minh or Kim Il-Sung the way they made fun of Saddam, the Kaiser, Hitler, Mussolini and Tojo?…. They all sure liked it when Baghdad, Dresden and Hamburg got firebombed, though.”
Yes, it has to be a Jewish war, or they´re not interested.
But when it´s a Jewish war, there´s only one way for all “right-thinking” people to go. Otherwise, you´re a wacko and a degenerate.
23 February, 2009 at 3:23 am
Joooo SOB Roasturd gave US Viet Nam to slaughter the last of large White male families and those who came home as a generation were brain washed in to having NO children or one. Then Mr. Roastruds tribe gave US MOVIES like Easy Rider, MASH, Catch 22, from 1968 to 1972 shown on US Mililtary based P.X. theaters, and they gave US radical crap on our College’s and perversion/subversion in our government.
Silent Coupe 1991. Ask your self why that book is out of print.
Viet Nam HURT US, by Sapping US and stoped any ressistence to the scum in the streets and screwed with our young folks minds.
23 February, 2009 at 3:23 am
shabbos s. shabazz Says:
“I provided the link, it ain’t proof and wasn’t offered as proof.
It’z a probability issue- he probably was.”
I respect shabbos´intelligent comments. He (unlike some others here) doesn´t make any irresponsible allegations, he just offered some interesting information, for whatever it´s worth.
It´s true that many German revolutionaries came to Texas and settled around Frederick, fleeing the failed communist revolution (Marx-inspired) of 1848. Not all of them were Jews. But in fact, if I remember correctly, there was a Jewish colony planned there (in Texas) by Karl Marx´ brother-in-law, a German aristocrat named Edgar von Westphalen.
(Marx married a German baroness, a socalite and beauty from a prominent family, Jennie von Westphalen; and another of his brothers-in-law was the Prussian Minister of the Interior. Like many other Jews who did the same, this infiltration of the aristocracy gave him powerful protection and influential social conections.)
As for LBJ, I can´t offer any comment one way or the other. It´s an interesting thing to consider. It seems that I had
read here some months ago something about Lady Bird also having suspicious Marrano roots via Mexico, but I can´t recall just what were the details or where. Again, I am leery about irresponsible speculation. But sometimes it hits the mark. If only I knew how to work that “Search” feature better!
http://www.trivia-library.com/b/famous-marriages-karl-marx-and-jenny-von-westphalen-part-3.htmhttp://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=47148
23 February, 2009 at 6:05 am
The thing that I wonder is how much of the REAL history of the United States is known by people who hide it in Yiddish and Hebrew and then talk about it openly in Delis and Temples and Summer Schools and among Academics having coffee in somebody’s University Apartments.
Might explain what otherwise seems like bizarre overconfidence on the part of some of these people.
23 February, 2009 at 8:44 am
“Her brother, Edgar von Westphalen, a follower of Marx, was involved with the German settlements in the h ill country of San Antonio.”
(note:This article says a “freethinker colony”, but I have read somewhere else that it was for re-settlement of primarily German Jews fleeing the failed revolution in Germany.)
“http://william-king.www.drexel.edu/top/eco/thotw09/Marx.ppt#280,4,A Texas Sidelight
http://william-king.www.drexel.edu/top/eco/thotw09/Marx.ppt#279,1,History of Economic Ideas
http://www.springerlink.com/content/n5618171377266h1/
• Jewish Immigrant Information Bureau (Galveston, TX), I-90: Includes internal correspondence of
JIIB staff, correspondence between JIIB and other organizations, and ship passenger lists of
immigrants who came through Galveston from Germany. A searchable name index to this collection,
created through a grant from the Jewish Genealogical Society of New York, can be found at
http://findingaids.cjh.org/?fnm=JIIBGalveston0 2&pnm=AJHS
—————————
Even the fabulously wealthy Baron de Hirsch (Jewish) sponsored Jewish immigration to Texas.
“America’s leading Jewish philanthropist, Jacob Schiff, and the Baron Maurice de Hirsch of France viewed Mexico as a promising site for Russian Jewish resettlement. De Hirsch had already created a fund to bring European Jewish immigrants to American ports such as Galveston, Texas, from which they departed to rural homes in Arkansas, Kansas, North Dakota and other states .”
http://www.ajhs.org/publications/chapters/chapter.cfm?documentID=226
23 February, 2009 at 8:50 am
For what it´s worth, here´s something I consider an EXTREMELY interesting quotation. This amazing comment about the extent of Jewish power over the USA was made in 1844:
“With the hindsight of events that transpired after the fall of the Soviet Union, it appears that the most profound analysis of Karl Marx was not his economic analysis, but his analysis of religion. Rooted in the philosophy of the Enlightenment with Voltaire warning that the particularistic religious precepts may “some day become deadly to the human race” Karl Marx, with astounding prescience, foresees the rise of Judeo-Protestantism that promotes egoism wrapped in religion.
Marx critique of Judaism was summarized in his Zur Judenfrage, published in 1844 in the Deutsch-Franzosische Jarbucher. His arguments are based on the thesis that the core of Judaism is extreme partiality, instrumental in the accumulation of wealth. Marx observes that in North America, Jews exercise immense power and the domination of Judaism over the Christian world is fait accompli.
http://www.visualstatistics.net/Catastrophe/Jenny%20Marx/Jenny%20Marx.htm
23 February, 2009 at 10:54 am
Ein, Thanks for the good post.
So the few Academics in the last 175 years who knew of these items, must have been in disbelief, and most likely perhaps jooos communications and cohesiveness is and was much better in reallity than most of us could know of.
23 February, 2009 at 4:19 pm
Ein: I don’t know why two of your posts got stuck in the spam filter. But I see that you were able to alter the post and send it through.
23 February, 2009 at 4:35 pm
“Ein: I don’t know why two of your posts got stuck in the spam filter.”
- – - – - – - – - -
I don´t either. I tried several times. No good. Perhaps the post was too long. Came back and tried again later. Still wouldn´t go. So I tried splitting it up …. and it went through!
Where I am (South America) it´s very difficult accessing this site, and it has become even more difficult to do lately.
23 February, 2009 at 6:34 pm
(This did not go through either, whatever the obstruction. Will try again.)
- – - – - – - – -
In further regard to that remarkable observation made by Marx, in 1844, that Jews had already attained “immense power and domination over North America”, let me add this about the Rothschilds. And note that significant date: 1844.
Augustus Schoenberg (later Belmont), of Frankfurt Germany, was an employee and a relative of the Rothschilds by marriage (though an uncle). In 1837, he was sent to Cuba as the represeentative of the Rothchild banking house. Spain at that time was embroiled in a civil war and the Spanish royalists were receiving large sums through Havana.
In 1837, the House of Rothschild posted Schoenberg to Havana, to manage the firm’s interests there. At the time, Cuba was a possession of the Spanish empire, and … its monarch, Queen Christina, was receiving large sums through the island to finance her side against the Carlist claimants to the throne.
Schoenberg then settled in New York, where he took charge of the Rothschild banking interests. He changed his name to Belmont (it being French for Schoenberg, sounding less Jewish) and became an American citizen. “He became an American citizen and joined the Democratic Party to further establish himself, becoming a generous supporter (Wikipedia). In 1844 he was made U.S. consul general for Austria.
In 1849, he married the New York socialite Caroline Slidell Perry, niece of Oliver Hazard Perry, the War of 1812 naval hero. She was also the daughter of Commodore Matthew Perry, another famed naval officer. Four years after the marriage, in 1853, Belmont’s father-in-law would sail to Japan and force its feudal rulers to allow Western ships after a 250-year ban. Such a union added immeasurably to Belmont’s status (and wealth). The newlyweds lived in one of the first residences built on Fifth Avenue. http://www.answers.com/topic/august-belmont
The New York Sun, commenting on Belmont’s wine cellar, called it perhaps the finest in America at the time. There were rumors that Belmont’s wine bills sometimes exceeded $20,000 in a single month, (although) he was occasionally criticized for asking his elderly father-in-law, Commodore Perry, to go fetch a vintage from the cellar.
Note Caroline`s name, Slidell. It`s further worth noting that the Slidell`s were backers of the South in the American Civil War. One of the Slidell sisters was married to the Jewish banker in Paris, Baron Erlanger. Thus while Belmont, representing the Rothschild`s, was backing the North in the war, the Slidell`s were financing the South. “He (Belmont) also worked behind the scenes to assure the Rothschilds and other influential names in Europe that the North would prevail:”
The Erlangers were another family of Jewish bankers who had originated in Frankfurt and were related to the Rothschild`s.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9B04E4D91E39E433A25755C1A9649C94699ED7CF
There is today the Erlanger Hospitalof the Univer. of Tenneess in Cattanooga.
“It was the generosity of a French nobleman in 1889 that led to the creation of Chattanooga’s leading healthcare provider. Dismayed by a lack of local medical care, the Baron d’Erlanger – who had vast railroad holdings in this region – donated $5000 to build a hospital in Chattanooga. In today’s dollars, his contribution would be the equivalent of more than $4 million.
Appreciative city leaders named the new facility for its benefactor’s wife, Baroness Marguerite Mathilde Slidell d’Erlanger.” http://www.erlanger.org/giving/
The Erlangers-Slidells financed railroads throughout the South and were even related by marriage to Winston Churchill, as well as to to Averill Harriman, the American railroad tycoon/politician and Rothschild agent in America. ttp://www.neworleansbar.org/documents/ENews08Nostalgia0109RailroadBaron.pdf
23 February, 2009 at 7:02 pm
“Then Mr. Roastruds tribe gave US MOVIES like Easy Rider, MASH, Catch 22, from 1968 to 1972 shown on US Mililtary based P.X. theaters, and they gave US radical crap on our College’s and perversion/subversion in our government….”
A Vietnam veteran friend of mine remembers all the hoopla that accompanied the release of the movie Patton at his Army base (I know, it’s called a post, not a base) in 1970. All the generals and colonels on the base were in attendence for the premiere screening. They had all been young officers in WWII, some even served under Patton. Unsurprisingly, the movie recieved thunderous applause.
A week or two later, another new war movie was shown on the base, M*A*S*H. All the Korean War-era officers and enlisteds on the base came out to see it, but apparently neither they nor the Army recreation department realized what kind of a movie it really was. My friend says the audience was so insulted, they almost tore the screen off the wall, or words to that effect.
Yes, 1968 to 1972 was the era of the “antihero” in Hollywood movies, from Benjamin Braddock in The Graduate, to Joe Buck and Ratso Rizzo in Midnight Cowboy, to Captain Yossarian in Catch 22. Then Jaws and Star Wars came along and movies just became big-budgeted, mindless mass entertainment after that.
24 February, 2009 at 1:22 am
Would it be fair to say that “antihero” among its other meanings could also mean heroes who look a lot more like the normal average Jew? Today somebody like Sacha Noam Baron Cohen or Adam Sadler can be 20 mill dollar leads. Not until after the sixties could that have been true. Is that fair to say?
They didn’t have to find a gentile looking figurehead then. The stars could look more like the people who were always behind the camera or with the books.
They finally came out of the closet and antihero = Jew who can look like a Jew. Sure Joe Buck looks gentile and a typical Hollywood old school star. But how about Ratso Rizzo? Who looks like him in the old movies. Maybe Peter Lorre? That’s about it and Lorre’s character was always left as despicable and evil. You were never suppose to understand or feel sad for Peter Lorre.
I wonder why George C Scott gave the finger to the academy and didn’t come to get his award. Something about competition at the time but maybe he was saying something else? They never forgave him for doing that as I recall. Was he doing a Mel Gibson while drunk statement move in some way you think?
24 February, 2009 at 4:02 am
At the 1970 Academy Awards, John Wayne was annoyed that Midnight Cowboy won Best Picture. “It’s just a movie about two fags”, he groused. Can you imagine any he-man actor today talking about Brokeback Mountain or The Crying Game like that? It would be curtains for his career.
Now that you mention it, Mr. Futurist, many of those Hollywood antiheroes were indeed Jews, except for Dennis Hopper, Jack Nicholson (both Micks) and Peter Fonda (Eye-talian).
24 February, 2009 at 4:16 am
Baron de Hirsch, Baron Erlanger, Baron Rothschild , Disraeli (Earl of Beaconsfield), the banker Sir Ernest Cassel…on and on. I can´t help noticing all these phony European “noblemen”.
In reality, they were all Frankfurt banking Jews, masquerading behind their bought and paid for titles.
24 February, 2009 at 5:39 pm
Baron de Hooknose and Lord von Gefilte Fish.
:-D
24 February, 2009 at 9:41 pm
Baron de Moneylender and Lord von Coin clipper
26 February, 2009 at 1:02 am
The author of Steel Helmets points out that Johnson,Nixon and Billy Gram all had the surnames and typical features of Northumbrian border freebooters.
26 February, 2009 at 1:24 am
Steel Bonnets not Helmets, Graham not Gram read the intro at amazon
26 February, 2009 at 4:12 pm
“Today somebody like Sacha Noam Baron Cohen or Adam Sadler can be 20 mill dollar leads. Not until after the sixties could that have been true. Is that fair to say?”
Yes, it’s fair. It seems that Woody Allen and Dustin Hoffman led the way. Then later, Seinfeld. And especially Barbra Stresand; don’t forget her… she made it acceptable for female stars to look and act Jewish. And Joan Rivers made it acceptable for them to talk Jewish… (mean and nasty).
8 July, 2009 at 2:29 am
These two advised Walt Rostow. They are “game theory” Nobel Laureates whose game theories never worked and caused 2 million deaths. How do these guys sleep at night?
http://www.voltairenet.org/article130204.html