20 March, 2009
Irving Klaw
Posted by Socrates in jewed culture, pornography, rock music, Socrates at 4:33 am | 
Permanent Link
Most of you have probably never heard of the Jewish photographer and businessman Irving Klaw. He died in 1966.
But you probably have heard of the young woman he molded into the first star of erotic bondage, Bettie Page. Isn’t it just like a Jew to pioneer the bondage industry? Jews also pioneered the general porno industry. There is also a rock group named after Klaw.
20 March, 2009 at 5:44 am
I’ve always found it rather confounding to say the least that so many so called Pro White men spend so much time partaking in a pastime that reduces so many White women to nothing but a pair of bosoms and a vagina
20 March, 2009 at 7:12 am
“I’ve always found it rather confounding that so many so called Pro White men spend so much time partaking in a pastime that…”
And Jews are happy to cater to their fantasies. Even to feed them.
20 March, 2009 at 8:00 am
“We” have cum a long way in porn since the good ol’ days of eight pagers. The Jews now-a-days have brought “us”
http://www.wartenbergwheel.com/enemas.htm
And..
http://www.brunobeast.com/trailer/brunobeast1/hi_trailer.html
Yeah, Western civilization has “evolved” because of the Jews..
20 March, 2009 at 10:10 am
Actually, my statement above was not all that I had written. I thought I had erased it to write more later. Alas…….
But, having said that……I AM confounded that so many White men have participated in the degradation of White women since Hugh Hefner first appeared back in the fifties.
If you look back at the early days of “nudie” postcards, etc., you will see something rather odd: most of those women waaaay back then at the turn of the century through about the twenties, looked surprisingly JEWEY. It’s amazing really. It appears that a good many of those first women who posed naked were kikesses. So, when did that change exactly and why? Was Hugh Hefner the first jew to come along and use White women instead of jews in pornography?
And I consider any degrading picture of a naked female to be pornography. Your definition may differ from mine–frankly I don’t care. I know porn when I see it and most of what is on the internet these days is meant to degrade White women.
Unfortunately, White women appear all too willing these days to partake in their own humiliation and degradation. And for what? It’s not like they’re getting really rich? It’s not like it brings them happiness or respect? So….why? I’ll be damned if I can figure out why so many White females are doing this to themselves these days.
But, regardless, it’s high time White males took the high road in all of this and DEMANDED better behavior out of their women. Maybe if White men expected better behavior, White women would follow your lead.
What the hell do you have to lose? Well, only your WOMEN AND YOUR RACE AND YOUR FUTURE. THAT’S ALL.
20 March, 2009 at 12:07 pm
Susan
Congoids first, and then other non Whites are maniac’s for White women in porn.
Any White man who was un-lucky enough to be raised in big city, serve in the military and etc., knows that back before the P.C. they would buy porn till were broke. With out a doubt White beautiful women in porn has directly lead to White women at large being attacked.
White men at large I don’t think understand that having the freedom of porn being freely leads to increasing attacks on White women.
I was visiting Redding CA. back in 1984, extremely WHITE then, and very Hot place in the summer, so I walking a small store to get a cold drink, and I noticed two Congoids standing and they were stareing into Porn magazines.
When I was in the military I never purchased a playboy etc. as they were all over the rec. rooms etc.
I do remember one thing about the play boy adviser and that it was always advising men to partake in anal sex on Women, or that it was okay, or assuring it was what women really needed/desired.
While in college it was only “jooos” and a joooo friend who advised me that you only could get a women’s respect by corn holing her and how he always rear ended every women he got his hands on in bed.
I was always repulsed by this, and I say a straight young man even drunk could never have a desire to do such a thing.
My 2 cents
20 March, 2009 at 12:33 pm
Very good and valid points, Susan. The degeneracy and defilement of whites in general, is very toxic to our survival prospects. I noticed the kosher racial factor in early porn photos as well; very few blonds as I recall. The degradation of white women today is not only shameless, it is criminally dangerous to us all. It’s not only an ugly part of the low level race war being waged against us, but a reflection of how low our own race has fallen.
20 March, 2009 at 2:19 pm
In Spain a couple of years ago I noticed the sidewalk newsstands were always stocked with porn videos. The stuff was right in front, even kids could see it.
In the good old days Franco’s people would have got hold of the scum producing this degeneracy and have them at the very least thrown in the slammer. End of problem.
20 March, 2009 at 3:05 pm
Oh, come on. Sex is supposed to be “dirty”. That’s part of its allure. And pornography has always been around, even in caveman days, so you can’t really blame Hymie for that. And if men weren’t interested in sex, I daresay most of wouldn’t exist. I think there is still some lingering vestiges of prudish “catholic guilt” in the WN ranks.
20 March, 2009 at 3:12 pm
Forgive me, but I have the world’s cheapest, shittiest, Chink-manufactured keyboard and so I make more than few annoying errors when posting. I’d like to amend the above post to read: “I daresay most of US wouldn’t exist. I think there ARE still some lingering vestiges of prudish “Catholic guilt” in the WN ranks.”
Thank you.
20 March, 2009 at 3:25 pm
You forgot about Harvey Glatman.
20 March, 2009 at 4:06 pm
Susan said: “If you look back at the early days of “nudie” postcards, etc., you will see something rather odd: most of those women waaaay back then at the turn of the century through about the twenties, looked surprisingly JEWEY. It’s amazing really. ”
It’s been a long time since I’ve seen such old postcards, and I have to stretch my memory. But you know what? You’re right! I never thought of that. Somehow, those women (and men too) never looked quite fully European. Rather exotic, and not attractive either. Now it makes sense. Yes, they’ve been in the business for a long time.
Thesed “Luftmenschen” will do anything to skim a buck from anything that’s of no economic value. They’re just a step removed from fortune tellers.
20 March, 2009 at 4:09 pm
“I think there ARE still some lingering vestiges of prudish “Catholic guilt” in the WN ranks”
Forget the keyboard, it was left-wing jew sentiment the first time round.
‘Men interested in sex’ doesn’t justify jew subversiveness or what THEY call ‘sexuality’ in an Aryan society.
BTW, what’s happening with the forum? Slow for two days and now I can’t get it at all.
20 March, 2009 at 4:38 pm
DOS attack most likely.
Or Linder pulled the plug.
20 March, 2009 at 4:38 pm
DOS attack most likely.
Or Linder pulled the plug.
20 March, 2009 at 4:39 pm
sorry for the double post. Fucking computers.
20 March, 2009 at 6:10 pm
Porno is just puerile masturbatory fantasy.
Human sex is 99% mental and 1% physical stimulation.
Even Jimmy Carter admitted to committing fornication in his heart by fantasizing about women in a sexual context.
Condemning porno is making it the “forbidden fruit” and thus more desirable.
21 March, 2009 at 12:09 am
And so it goes that the jew produces whatever vice, and the white guys go buy it.
Then even some WN types defend the vice they have gotten and try to say oh, it’s always been like that.
Most non-white cultures have a lot of porno paintings and pottery and sculpture.
We had our master painters painting a naked woman here and there, but the jew exploits human desire, and gets paid well for what he ‘produces’, and gets to degrade white women.
The porn industry is full of jews from beginning to end and that alone means it must be a bad thing.
21 March, 2009 at 12:16 am
Those old “french postcards” generally featured women who were rather short and dark. But maybe that was due to people in general being shorter back then and to the nature of early black and white photography itself, which made brown or red hair look black. I often wondered who those girls were and how they managed to get involved with nudie photographs and even early pornography. A lot of that old porno was at least as hardcore as the stuff that’s currently being done. Sexuality is just a part of human nature and it’s always been that way, like it or not. The past was NOT like some 1950s TV show.
Tom McJerk, it’s been my experience that those like you who condemn pornography the loudest usually have the biggest stash of it.
21 March, 2009 at 1:22 am
All I’m saying is let’s not be hypocrites. Yes, a lot of pornography is brutal and degrading, but let’s not blame The Other for our own weaknesses or perverted desires. Porn is an industry that generates billions in profit every year and most of its consumers are White heterosexual males. The Jew does not hold a gun to your head and make you buy smut.
21 March, 2009 at 1:28 am
Once again I find myself siding with Zarathustra on this issue. The Jews aren’t these all powerful monsters forcing porno on the unsuspecting White masses. Oh yes, all White people would be good Christian people and only fuck in the missionary position if the evil Jews just wouldn’t “force” White people to think dirty thoughts. Do some of you clowns really believe that shit?
There is NOTHING wrong with being lustful and wanting to look at “dirty” pictures. It is perfectly natural and those of you that have a problem with that obviously have some sort of Christian hang up. Pagans were perfectly comfortable with nudity and the human body, it was only with the coming of that Jew-frankenstein religion Christ-insanity that people became ashamed of sex and their bodies.
Copulation was glorified in ancient European societies and nudity was everywhere- yes, right in front of the children (gasp!!!) In ancient Greece “porn” was everywhere to be seen, especially decorating clay drinking and eating implements. The Romans had erotic paintings decorating their living rooms and it was considered the height of class to have these displayed prominently in the house. I’ve seen these paintings myself in Pompeii.
If only some of you could free your minds from the poison of Christianity!
21 March, 2009 at 1:45 am
Susan said:
“I’ve always found it rather confounding to say the least that so many so called Pro White men spend so much time partaking in a pastime that reduces so many White women to nothing but a pair of bosoms and a vagina”
With all due respect, you will NEVER understand what White men or any men for that matter see in dirty pictures because you are a WOMAN. Women are wired differently then men and they usually aren’t stimulated in the same manner. Men in general are sexually stimulated visually. It’s natural, and unless you come back in your next life as a man with normal sexual urges, you won’t understand.
I personally find a beautiful set of breasts and a vagina very attractive. I have no problem seeing White people engaged in sexual intercourse. I also never tire of seeing beautiful White women in erotic poses. And guess what? I am 100% White racist and I’m not ashamed one bit about my desire to see the above things.
21 March, 2009 at 2:25 am
Herr Blackshirt, apparently sex is a shameful and disgusting act that should only be done by a married couple in a dark bedroom in the missionary position and only for the purpose of procreation. It should last no more than 30 seconds and when it’s over the man should roll over and go to sleep and the woman should go in the bathroom and cry.
The White Struggle will NEVER get anywhere until the last remnants of irrational Christian guilt, shame and fear are swept away, I tell you.
21 March, 2009 at 2:30 am
LOL,,,, all porn is gay………….
21 March, 2009 at 3:23 am
LOL @ Zarathustra… well said!
21 March, 2009 at 7:16 am
The only porn I have a problem with is that where the rectum is visible. Sodomy is disgusting perpetrated on females as it is between two guys.
21 March, 2009 at 7:18 am
is “as” disgusting.
Interracial, too … bring on the ropes
21 March, 2009 at 9:29 am
Look at Zarastrutha and friend/sockpuppet railing against imaginary “Christian guilt” just as the infilrators on the forum rail against imaginary “Republicans”. There’s been enough of that on the forum in recent months, blaming everything on Christianity and minimising the jew.
Big Jew puts sex and smut everywhere, including forcing it on schoolchildren.
“Oh yes, all White people would be good Christian people and only fuck in the missionary position if the evil Jews just wouldn’t “force” White people to think dirty thoughts. Do some of you clowns really believe that shit?
There is NOTHING wrong with being lustful and wanting to look at “dirty” pictures. It is perfectly natural and those of you that have a problem with that obviously have some sort of Christian hang up..
If only some of you could free your minds from the poison of Christianity!”
Are you the ghost of Abbie Hoffman? That read exactly like 1960s left-wing jew propaganda.
21 March, 2009 at 10:09 am
There is a big difference between harmless titilation, excuse the pun, and the hard-core porn which is constantly being pushed in our faces.
Ask yourselves this; what is the purpose of pornography? A jerk-off fantasy? not really as the material is a turn off. Or perhaps its aim is to turn a quick buck? No, the real objective of pornography is to degrade relationships between men and women, so that both parties see the other as something to be used.
Both globalists and jews have an interest in pushing that agenda.
How can we succeed without strong White families built on the solid foundations of mutual respect and fidelity?
21 March, 2009 at 11:32 am
Nogkiller Says:
21 March, 2009 at 7:18 am
is “as” disgusting.
Interracial, too … bring on the ropes
———————————————————————————-
Tom McReen Says:
21 March, 2009 at 9:29 am
Look at Zarastrutha and friend/sockpuppet railing against imaginary “Christian guilt” just as the infilrators on the forum rail against imaginary “Republicans”. There’s been enough of that on the forum in recent months, blaming everything on Christianity and minimising the jew.
Big Jew puts sex and smut everywhere, including forcing it on schoolchildren.
“Oh yes, all White people would be good Christian people and only fuck in the missionary position if the evil Jews just wouldn’t “force” White people to think dirty thoughts. Do some of you clowns really believe that shit?
There is NOTHING wrong with being lustful and wanting to look at “dirty” pictures. It is perfectly natural and those of you that have a problem with that obviously have some sort of Christian hang up..
If only some of you could free your minds from the poison of Christianity!”
Are you the ghost of Abbie Hoffman? That read exactly like 1960s left-wing jew propaganda.
In early 2000, I was sent a sample copy of a Major porn mag not playboy, but the other one can’t rememeber the name, any way I had not seen one in over ten years still I opened it and looked at it, and was showing women urinating in to the camera. ??
joooooey.
Rope, rope, rope, as YOU know children have seen it now.
Mr. Z, do you know what shame and degradation is ?
Let me say in advance you are a human POS on legs
——————————————————————————-
You two gentlemen spoke for me in those posts. Maybe Mr. Z is really Al Goldstein.
21 March, 2009 at 11:38 am
Rest assured jooos are reading this thread.
21 March, 2009 at 12:16 pm
“Rest assured jooos are reading this thread.”
……………………….
And writing it!
21 March, 2009 at 1:17 pm
GW, thanks for the laugh. About my sample isssue an idiot and long time aquintence Who worked in the Post Office filled out the magazine sample request card to be bill me later and to have it sent to me led to him being Persona Nongrata by, and pain to get the sub stopped that I did not send for it and would not pay to stop or I would take legal action, they stopped.
That long time PO Employee ended up being fired for other issues un-related to me that were big time, so it was poetic justice.
21 March, 2009 at 1:37 pm
“Tom Mcreen”
I’ve been involved in some form of the White Racial Struggle for 20 years or more. One of the things that I have noticed is that at the first sign of disagreement with another racist’s opinion, the accusation of “he’s a jew infiltrator!!!” comes up. Isn’t this a curious phenomenon? I swear I could write a book about this.
You sir, wish to label myself and Zarathustra as Jew infiltrators/communists, Atheists, etc. etc. Now it is my turn to label you, and I’m going to use far more insulting and descriptive terms…
You are a conservative, right-wing reactionary and are useless to the cause of White survival.
Christianity= Jew religion
21 March, 2009 at 1:45 pm
Notice that the “Tom McReen” types can only call me a “jew infiltrator” but they never can counter my argument that the body shame/ anti-porn thing is pure Christian bullshit?
Why is that?
What do you have to say about ancient European cultural depictions of copulation, erotic poses, phalluses, etc.? Roman, Greek, Celt, Germanic- all societies where these things were glorified, and not one bit of “jew influence”.
Oh, I can hear the accusations now from the conservative Rush Limbaugh crowd already… “Jew!!!” LOL Go read your Jew bible you freaks- I wipe my ass with it.
21 March, 2009 at 1:48 pm
For the record, I don’t like much of the pornography that is out there- especially the interracial and corn hole shit. But I won’t sit here and rail against the Jews as if they are the sole reason people look at the stuff- that is pure idiocy and ignorance.
Frankly I am suspicious of any man that likes asshole fucking.
21 March, 2009 at 2:02 pm
Howie Doowey, you are a nit-wit. No further elaboration is necessary……..
Tom, old boy, Herr Blackshirt is absolutely right about you. “Family Values” CONservatives such as yourself are an IMPEDIMENT to White racial progress. Maybe you’d be happier associating with Krazee Kosher Konservatives like Hal Lindsey and John Hagee. I’ll bet they hate and fear naked girls almost as much as you do!
21 March, 2009 at 2:15 pm
Horse poop.
Nudists that are raciallly aware on our side , and with out a doubt I will assume that ever critic of the pro filth types have no problem with the beauty of realist Art depicting the beauty of heathy Whites their Prime as flower in Nature.
Rope for Hope.
21 March, 2009 at 2:17 pm
I am assuming/guessing Nudist’s folks are on our side and are anti porn.
21 March, 2009 at 2:26 pm
I’ll admit that I find it distressing to see so many beautiful Eastern Euro girls who are willing to have anal sex on camera for money. Is that what 45 years of Communism has done to Czech society? Naturally, a lot of their on-screen “partners” are swarthy, North African or Semitic types.
21 March, 2009 at 2:31 pm
The problem with nudists is that they are usually the last people you’d ever want to see with their clothes off.
21 March, 2009 at 8:31 pm
Howdy Doody Says:
21 March, 2009 at 1:17 pm
GW, thanks for the laugh.
—————
You’re quite welcome, Mr. Doody. Let the shoe fit whom it may.
I’ll avoid naming names; they know who they are much better than I do.
I just ask: Can’t we all avoid this distracting squabbling (it’s so childish and unproductive), and treat each other civilly?
21 March, 2009 at 8:34 pm
Z says: The problem with nudists is that they are usually the last people you’d ever want to see with their clothes off.
Ah, isn’t life cruel?
It’s like money or leisure. By the time you get them, you’re too old to enjoy them! You just can’t have it all at once.
22 March, 2009 at 5:30 am
“Christianity= Jew religion”
Christianity = Dead in the White West. (What’s more, Jews are happy to see it dead.)
Your theory is a little less than watertight. Even as Western nations are de-Christianised, the pace of disintegration shows no signs of stopping.
22 March, 2009 at 5:41 am
Okay so Pagan Europe was pretty uninhibited when it comes to sex and porno, fine.
Nevertheless, when the Marxist Frankfurt School promoted free sex and porn in the 1960s they did so with particular results in mind. They knew that liberal attitudes to sexuality would lead to liberal attitudes to race-mixing, women (leading to a critically low birth rate), and so on.
22 March, 2009 at 5:57 am
International kiketry on sexual liberalism:
http://www.davidduke.com/general/how-a-handfull-of-marxist-jews-turned-western-and-us-culture-upside-down_3519.html
WILHEIM REICH
• In his 1933 book entitled The Mass Psychology of Fascism, he explained that the Frankfurt School departed from the Marxist sociology that set “Bourgeois” against “Proletariat.” Instead, the battle would be between “reactionary” and “revolutionary” characters.
• He also wrote a book entitled The Sexual Revolution, which was a precursor of what was to come in the 1960s.
• His “sex-economic” sociology was an effort to harmonize Freud’s psychology with Marx’s economic theory.
• Reich’s theory was expressed in his words: “The authoritarian family is the authoritarian state in miniature. Man’s authoritarian character structure is basically produced by the embedding of sexual inhibitions and fear in the living substance of sexual impulses. Familial imperialism is ideologically reproduced in national imperialism…the authoritarian family…is a factor where reactionary ideology and reactionary structures are produced.”
• Wilhelm Reich’s theory, when coupled with Georg Lukacs’ sex education in Hungary, can be seen as the source for the American education cartel’s insistence on sex education from kindergarten onwards and its complete negation of the paternal family, external authority, and the traditional character structure.
• Reich’s theory encompassed other assertions that seem to have permeated American education:
o The organized religious mysticism of Christianity was an element of the authoritarian family that led to Fascism.
o The patriarchal power in and outside of man was to be dethroned.
o Revolutionary sexual politics would mean the complete collapse of authoritarian ideology.
o Birth control was revolutionary ideology.
o Man was fundamentally a sexual animal.
• Reich’s The Mass Psychology of Fascism was in its ninth printing as of 1991, and is available in most college bookstores.
22 March, 2009 at 10:08 am
So many of my friends who are college grads make statements like “Well its like this down through history” There is a Block about joo thing.
A troll on this site was yelling that hicks will not wake up to joos and etc., this troll would not be here if it WAS not afraid of US. We do not need the Mass Asse’s we needed a solid 3-10% and the jooos KNOW it.
22 March, 2009 at 11:29 am
DEC Says: “Okay so Pagan Europe was pretty uninhibited when it comes to sex and porno, fine.”
No doubt it was direct and “earthy”, as all simple societies are; and without guilt or euphemisms. Humans will always be interested in other humans. That’s healthy and normal. But there was no commercialized sex or mass-produced pornography. Nor anybody leeching off this basic human interest and exploiting it for profit.
Certainly pagan Europe was no orgy scene, allowing perhaps for some special festivals and exceptions. The Roman historians remarked on the strong sense of propriety and virtue among the ancient Britons and Germans, and contrasted their virtue to the Romans’ lack of it.
22 March, 2009 at 11:38 am
“We do not need the Masses Asse’s we [only] need a solid 3-10% and the jooos KNOW it.”
I sure they DO know it! They manage to do it quite effectively[control society] with just 2.5% of the population.
They know how effective a tiny, but militant and organized, minority can be. They have specialized in this for centuries, and have mastered the technique.
22 March, 2009 at 12:36 pm
There are pornographic images, bawdy poems and crude songs in Western culture that go back to Celtic and Etruscan times, if not earlier. Did you know that actors on the ancient Greek stage wore outfits that featured long leather phalluses they used to swing aroung for comic effect? I guess Aristophanes must have been a Jew out to corrupt Athenian audiences. After all, us goyim NEVER had a dirty thought in our heads until them Jooz showed up. How impressionable we all is!
22 March, 2009 at 5:17 pm
I am very sad to read that there are White nationalists who condone pornography. Women are the soul of a race, they must be respected. I am against pornography and my feeling does not have anything to do with christianity. I doubt the great Dr. William Pierce would condone pornography. In Nazi Germany (the most moral society in history), pornography was outlawed (it was considered a crime against the race). I remember the Nazis burnt pornography and communist propaganda. If you buy pornography you are giving your money to a jew.
It seems that the moral decay of the white race ir progressing, given the fact that there are White nationalist who aprrove of this sick behavior.
Remember the definition of morality: Moral is what is good for us. I do not see how pornography is good.
I agree 100% with Susan.
22 March, 2009 at 5:22 pm
Be all that as it may Zarathustra, the kike-led Leftist, Feminist and Marxist Movements are promoting porn with the death of the White race in mind.
22 March, 2009 at 11:30 pm
Gentlemen, you all make very good points against pornography. But unless those “adult entertainers” are being forced to do things on camera that are against their will, then I must continue to believe that viewing or possessing pornography is a personal matter. The obvious exceptions would be for anything involving minors, animals or the dead.
Consenting adults are going to do what they are going to do, regardless of what society thinks. We must be realistic here; banning pornographic material will only cause it to go further “underground” and encourage organized crime to take it over.
22 March, 2009 at 11:32 pm
One more thing, if I may….Pornography, prostitution, homosexuality and gambling were all banned in Bolshevik Russia, too.
22 March, 2009 at 11:32 pm
“Did you know that actors on the ancient Greek stage wore outfits that featured long leather phalluses they used to swing aroung for comic effect?”
Yes, I know that, but women did not attend Greek plays. Like athletics (performed in the nude), they were entertainments strictly for men only. The sanctity of the home and the family were kept apart from entertainment and were carefully respected.
I also think that Mediterraneans and Meterranean cultures have always been rather lusty, by contrast with the more discrete, modest Northern peoples. At this abnormal moment in history, though, this traditional contrast has been utterly reversed, so that the exact opposite prevails. Probably Italians or Greeks would be scandalised at the perversions that go on in Sweden or Holland (bordellos for animal sex, for instance). This shows how corrupt and unnatural the present situation has become. A healthy interest in other humans is normal, but the Jews find a way to commercialize everything and turn it into a money-making operation. That is not normal. They would charge us for breathing, if they could.
I have to agree with Royal that, “When you buy pornography you are giving your money to a jew.” I think at least that much cannot be debated.
22 March, 2009 at 11:45 pm
“We must be realistic here; banning pornographic material will only cause it to go further “underground”
I did not realize that we were talking about “banning” anything. Suddenly, that word has come into the discussion. While I disapprove of some things, I am also very leery about all forms of censorship.
But disapproval of something, anything, may not necessarily extend to banning. Certainly, alcohol, sugar and chocolate are not good for you, and you’d be better off without them, but I don’t know about banning them! Shall we ban potato chips too?
While uncomfortable with some things, probably, in the balance, I disapprove of censorship more. Maybe we should ban censorship? Maybe we should ban banning!
22 March, 2009 at 11:47 pm
True, there are an inordinate number of Jews involved with the porn industry, but the Gentiles Larry Flint and Bob Guccione were much more successful in the skin trade than the Jew Al Goldstein was. Now with the Internet, many Gentile couples and entrepeneurs are simply making their own stuff and putting it online for little or no charge.
I’m not making excuses for the Jew, I know he controls the White Slave trade and worse. I just don’t want us to get sucked down into any fever-swamps about what the Jews are and aren’t responsible for. Sometimes us Goyim do enough damage to ourselves without any help from Shylock, you know.
22 March, 2009 at 11:55 pm
Sorry, Herr Ein, I should have realized that you were not advocating censorship. But many well-meaning WNs do think we need to be protected through Law from anything objectionable or unseemly. I have always hated censorship of any kind. Let White adults decide what they like or don’t like for themselves, don’t let’s leave it up to bureaucrats, popes, priests, politicians and social activists.
23 March, 2009 at 6:46 am
“Consenting adults are going to do what they are going to do, regardless of what society thinks.”
This is exactly the sort of moral libertarianism that got us in the mess we are today.
23 March, 2009 at 11:43 am
“One more thing, if I may….Pornography, prostitution, homosexuality and gambling were all banned in Bolshevik Russia, too.”
I find this perplexing. Even the Jew-Commie USSR had its plusses I guess.
Another funny thing is that the Judaic USSR maintained White cohesion.
Reichian sexual liberalism (which you seem to broadly agree with Z) was proposed as a response to the non-growth of Communism in Europe. European culture was deemed too conservative and authoritarian.
Then, as now, the Jew Commie-Anarchists are waging war through culture.
23 March, 2009 at 11:48 am
If you break the culture, you break the people, you break the nation, you break the race.
23 March, 2009 at 4:06 pm
“One more thing, if I may….Pornography, prostitution, homosexuality and gambling were all banned in Bolshevik Russia, too.”
As I understand it, Bolshevik Russia was, at first, wide open. But then, when they had to get to work and build the country and fight a war, they clamped down quite severely. They re-directed the masses’ attention from pleasure to work.
Reichian sexual liberalism (which you seem to broadly agree with Z) was proposed as a response to the non-growth of Communism in Europe. European culture was deemed too conservative and authoritarian.
Some of us can remember a time (not really so long ago) when the trendy set [largely composed of you know whos] would sneer with contempt at the USA as being “a puritanical society” and would compare us with Europe which was supposedly so much more “mature” and “liberated”. (In other words, we were childish.) We were endlessly told how backward and uptight Americans are. We were given Freudian explanations that we were “anal” (a favorite Jewish word), repressed, sick, and other such flattering psycho-babble! We were chided, ridiculed, and shamed into dropping our inhibitions. and “letting it all hang out”.
Eventually, they broke us down. Now, the pendulum has swung to the opposite direction. Anything goes. Young foreigners (Moslems , for instance) come here and are shocked (though fascinated too, I suspect). They consider us a depraved, hedonistic, sex-mad culture, deserving of destruction. Well, that wasn’t always the case. But anyone under thirty or forty wouldn’t remember that. All they know is what they see in front of them. America the Wicked! LOL
23 March, 2009 at 7:02 pm
Quite, Ein, quite.
Some of that liberal trendy set still complain about America being a “puritanical society”.
24 March, 2009 at 12:21 am
Many Europeans used to make fun of White America back in the 1920s to 1960s for our segregationist attempts to keep our Negroes under control. How unenlightened and unfair we were! But it was easy for the Euros to talk, since the non-White population of their countries was still extremely low. To the average Frenchie or Dutchman, Negroes were charming, “exotic” creatures. So what if a few Black GIs or West Indian immigrant workers or some colored Jazz musician wanted to grab a Dutch girl’s ass during a slow dance or something? How often were White people in Europe “lucky” enough to even see a Negro?
Now I guess the Europeans know from firsthand experience what it’s like to have to live with tens of millions of unwanted hominids leaping about, because I don’t hear the Europeans ridiculing America much any more for our “racism”.
24 March, 2009 at 8:07 pm
It’s always easy to advise others on what you don’t have to do yourself. As my parents always said, “Talk is cheap.”
Now, the joke is on those better-than-thou Europeans. But it’s a sad joke; I can’t say I’m laughing. It’s really a shame.
That goes for our Canadian neighbors too. If only they had learned something from our mistakes instead of preaching and presuming to give advice. They had to learn the hard way.
25 March, 2009 at 5:09 am
Jews are the leading traffickers in White females for prostitution, sex slavery, pornography, etc., around the world.
Israel is a major center of sex slavery, with many White girls, particularly Slavic women from Eastern Europe, being lured and eventually trapped or enslaved by these Jewish human traffickers.
Jews have a long history with the sex trade…it goes back a long time.
Jews are sick on so many levels – the only solution is total separation of Jews from non-Jews.
25 March, 2009 at 6:52 am
“Many Europeans used to make fun of White America back in the 1920s to 1960s for our segregationist attempts to keep our Negroes under control. How unenlightened and unfair we were! But it was easy for the Euros to talk …”
I could imagine a liberal elite Establishment in Europe making such statements, but Europe at large? I don’t think so.
25 March, 2009 at 8:39 am
“Europe at large? I don’t think so.”
Most people, anywhere, will just parrot whatever the elite group says. Whatever it’s fashionable and “correct” to think.
26 March, 2009 at 1:30 am
Speaking of pornography (and thus automatically of Jews), I went to majorityrights.com to have a peek at what they’re saying. I have never posted anything there (too stuffy for me), but I like to check them now and then. What I got was a porn site showing white women being mass-violated by a gang of sex-crazed Negroes. Huh? I guess this is somebody’s idea of a sick joke. Very sick indeed.
It doesn’t take too much effort to guess whose idea this is, as he blacks would not likely be capable of taking over a site and rigging something like this. But the Jews? Well, who else? Kinky inter-racial sex? It’s right up their alley.
24 May, 2009 at 5:57 pm
Some of us can remember a time (not really so long ago) when the trendy set [largely composed of you know whos] would sneer with contempt at the USA as being “a puritanical society”
The USA was never a Puritannical society, that’s a total myth. It’s a myth inflated enough that “Puritanism” (read: moral conservativism) can be more effectively undermined.
1 December, 2009 at 4:38 pm
HEY WHITEY! stop wasting your time blabbing about this crap! We all realize the Jew runs porno… And just like they’re cousins in Hollywood each decade they ratchet up the multiculturalism in it… Over the decades its gone from solo white women in simple erotic poses in the 50s – to solo white women doing degrading poses with legs fully spread showing all genitalia in the 60s – to white women and white men fornicating in the 70s – then they adding in raunchy shit like Anal, money shots, homosexuality, etc in the 80s – then they added interracial in the 90s – and now they have damn near phased out white men completely + adding all the usual raunchy degrading shit! to where the vast majority of porn you see now is blacks gang banging a white woman and nutting all over her… sick sadistic shit aimed at white women!
Its not a question about whether porn is bad or not, Its the simple fact that the Jews have taken simple pornography, and over the decades elevated it from simple pinups to sick sadistic filth! The white man’s porno can only be seen now a days in playboy where they don’t show genitalia, as they always cover the poontang with a decorative prop… It shows you what real white men want to see the beauty of our women, the old paintings and mosaics from past never showed genitalia/or intercourse! because that was not what white men intended plain and simple…
For all of you that get off to watching the actual intercourse or any of the sick so called “erotic” shit you have passed the boundary of pornography, and entered the realm of filthy smut!
Make no mistake the Jews that run 75% of pornography have an agenda! It is obvious they’re goal is to desensitize us to regular sex, in an effort to ensure we do not procreate! While at the same time they intend to make non-whites lust after our women!
So stop wasting your time on this thread! We all know what the problem is! so why don’t you all spend you time addressing the solution! the posts on this thread alone are proof that whites are not united in they’re goals and thus we are not accomplishing anything by bickering about the morals of porno!
—WAKE UP WHITEY!
9 January, 2010 at 3:53 am
Pornography is a vice best avoided, but the natural curiosity and sexual/visual drive of males compels them to seek the female physique in all it’s beauty and function. A good tome on this subject was written by Matthew Fitzgerald, and entitled: “Sexploytation: How Women Use Their Bodies to Exploit Money from Men”. In this small volume, Fitzgerald thoroughly debunks the feminist myth that women are self-sufficient, and not in need of males. He discusses the physical characteristics men respond to as they seek a mate. (One passage includes the hardline, radical feminist as having a butch haircut, a figure like a packing crate, and a disposition which repels both wimps and Alpha Males). In my personal opinion, women are DABTF (Designed and Built to F*ck). Their very existence revolves around attracting men, mating, becoming pregnant, and nurturing their offspring. Any variation on that fundamental theme renders females as out of their element. Of course, Jews are there to ensure they can infiltrate into any situation they desire, including high level government office, but the truth is, without the efforts of liberals/Jews to stir-up gender strife, and hence to empower themselves to control everything between men and women (they control everything else…) the so-called “Old Fashioned Values” would inevitably reappear. Any woman who is opposed to pornography should recognize that Jews play both ends of the Pied Piper flute; They encourage feminism, and at the same time, they exploit their flesh for big money.