24 May, 2009
It’s a Chick’s World, You Merely Live in It
Posted by Socrates in feminism, jewed culture, Jewed workplaces, Socrates at 4:54 pm | 
Permanent Link
Seen: so many female government officials on TV that you’d think males don’t exist. The war against White men has reached ridiculous proportions. Newbies, don’t be fooled. Women, due to their better verbal skills, sound smarter than they really are. Think of the ramifications of that. The West was built by men and they must lead it or it will spoil (not that it won’t spoil under Jewish or negro leadership).
24 May, 2009 at 5:22 pm
As a single White Man in his late 30s, I don’t have to be told how most of the women in my generation are thoroughly brainwashed- I’ve found this out firsthand through hard experience. And yes, the point about the large number of female politicians in the new gang in Washington is well taken. But I ask you, what is the point about starting another conversation that will lead to female bashing?
“The West was built by men and they must lead it or it will spoil” Really? Tell that to Catherine the Great, Elizabeth 1, Queen Victoria, Boudicca, and Maria Theresa. C’mon Socrates, don’t you know your history?
Really, what is the point of posting something like this? All you are going to get is the usual crowd of misogynists who will come out of the woodwork and say “women belong in the kitchen and pregnant” etc. etc. Look guys, the 1950s ideal of the obedient housewife who lives to serve her husband never was the reality for all women at the time and it won’t ever become the reality again. All you do when you bring this sort of shit up is send the VERY few women amongst us running as fast as they can away from us. Is that what you guys really want?
And to set the record straight, I don’t like what feminism has done to our women any more than the next guy. But we have to react to it in a reasonable and productive manner, and not alienate further the mothers of our people.
24 May, 2009 at 5:24 pm
Where have all the White men gone? You go to a store, a college campus, a hospital, a bank, watch the news on TV, call customer service and it’s all broads! They’re not even cute chicks most of the time, just the mean old prune-faced ones who do a lot of yakking about their RV trip to Las Vegas last summer and have denture breath.
Not even your neighborhood mechanic is a White guy anymore. Most likely he’s a Wog named Ahmed or Haji. All those man-hating feminist broads, uppity, disrespectful non-Whites and arrogant Jews who do no useful, productive labor whatsoever wouldn’t last ten days without White men around to build and maintain things properly. They hate us but they dare not live without us. The White man should go on strike for a week or two just to let them know who’s still really in charge.
24 May, 2009 at 5:33 pm
If you want something fixed that will stay fixed, get hold of a White guy in his 40′ or 50′s. Wimmin, gawd bless em, are hopless at anything mechanical, and as for Jose, Ahmed or Bongobongo, well they go through the motions and give the appearance fixing something, but next day it’s bust again.
24 May, 2009 at 5:41 pm
“Really, what is the point of posting something like this? All you are going to get is the usual crowd of misogynists who will come out of the woodwork and say “women belong in the kitchen and pregnant” etc. etc. Look guys, the 1950s ideal of the obedient housewife who lives to serve her husband never was the reality for all women at the time and it won’t ever become the reality again. All you do when you bring this sort of shit up is send the VERY few women amongst us running as fast as they can away from us. Is that what you guys really want?”
Yep the Feminist New Woman who has no children is just great for our race.
We should have no ideals for White women and just take a laissez-faire approach. It’s worked so far!
“And to set the record straight, I don’t like what feminism has done to our women any more than the next guy.”
Where you and I differ here is that you let women away scot free. You posit feminism and women aren’t really all that connected – despite the fact that the feminist movement and the women’s movement would have seen to be synonymous decades ago if not now. Feminism is of woman and results from too much liberty being given to women.
24 May, 2009 at 5:43 pm
“All you do when you bring this sort of shit up is send the VERY few women amongst us running as fast as they can away from us.”
Exactly there’s so few women in White Nationalism it matters not if we scare them away. When the Fascist State is formed it’s going to be all changes baby anyway.
Toning down our rhetoric to attract an extra woman or two the cause is going to be totally irrelevant.
Hitler actively co-opted and opposed feminist movements, by the way.
24 May, 2009 at 5:58 pm
HEY Blackshirt: You wouldn’t mind telling us what that “reasonable and productive manner” is……..The problem is not misogynist, its the law…especially in the work place. Thanks to Clinton, if you are charged with domestic violence you can forget about ever owning a gun. If a woman accuses you of anything you are guilty until proven innocent…and these so called “men”, who walk around with their brains in the head of their dick, think this is all O.K……most of which were raised by their mothers.
24 May, 2009 at 6:22 pm
Many feminist ‘new wimmin’ end up bedding down with some psychotic wife beating negro.
It would be funny if it weren’t so tragic.
Most women need to be guided by their parents and elder brothers in the serious matter of choosing as suitable husband.
Ladies, I will now retire to my bunker and await the flak!
24 May, 2009 at 6:42 pm
“HEY Blackshirt: You wouldn’t mind telling us what that “reasonable and productive manner” is……..The problem is not misogynist, its the law…especially in the work place. Thanks to Clinton, if you are charged with domestic violence you can forget about ever owning a gun. If a woman accuses you of anything you are guilty until proven innocent…and these so called “men”, who walk around with their brains in the head of their dick, think this is all O.K……most of which were raised by their mothers.”
To answer your first question Lee, a “reasonable and productive” manner is not female bashing plain and simple. Yes, you are absolutely correct that the laws are stacked against men- you can blame the Jewish and non-jewish feminists for that. But it is important to remember that the vast majority of women AREN’T feminists, although many of them have been influenced by the philosophy in one way or another. Our women aren’t in the current position they are in because most of them wanted to be that way, they are like they are because of non-stop brainwashing from a early age. So, what are we supposed to do as men? Should we punish our own flesh and blood because they have been misled and duped? Of course, I’m not advocating amnesty for our women who cross the race mixing line- once they have bred with a non-white they are dead to our people. But I do have compassion for the average American White woman who through no fault of her own has been duped.
As to the second part, I hope you aren’t insinuating that I “walk around with their brains in the head of their dick” and “think this is all O.K……most of which were raised by their mothers.” In my case I am pretty choosy about the women I take to my bed and I have lived most of my life without a mother. Finally, I definitely don’t think feminism is “OK”, but I have no problem with women being able to make free will decisions. What some of you are advocating is just a form of slavery. It is my opinion that our women shouldn’t be forced to be mothers or home-makers, but that once we get control of the media and education systems we can glorify those things and persuade women that those are honorable and desirable paths to take.
24 May, 2009 at 6:56 pm
“Yep the Feminist New Woman who has no children is just great for our race.
We should have no ideals for White women and just take a laissez-faire approach. It’s worked so far!”
C’mon Jewtracer, did you really read what I said? This just sounds like a hysterical reaction to what I posted. NOWHERE did I say that the “feminist new woman who has no children is just great for our race”. You are trying to throw me into a crowd I don’t belong with. I’m just a reasonable White racist man who has been around long enough to know a few things about human nature and I would like to see us White racists take reasonable and intelligent stances towards things.
As far as ideals for white women goes, we have no control over that until we get control over the media and education systems. But you aren’t going to get very far if our struggle continues to exhibit this misogynist streak.
“Toning down our rhetoric to attract an extra woman or two the cause is going to be totally irrelevant. Hitler actively co-opted and opposed feminist movements, by the way.”
It is good that you mention NS Germany and Hitler, because Hitler wouldn’t have supported forcing women into a form of slavery that some of you advocate. Hitler had a tremendous amount of support coming to power from German women- it is well documented. So you defeat your own argument Jewtracer about how we don’t need our women if you use the Führer as an example. Hitler had no problem letting women pursue careers outside of the home- Leni Riefenstahl anyone?
Also, I’m not advocating “toning down” our rhetoric, unless “toning down” means scrapping the misogyny.
24 May, 2009 at 8:42 pm
“Also, I’m not advocating “toning down” our rhetoric, unless “toning down” means scrapping the misogyny.”
I get the impression that you have a very low treshold for what qualifies as “misogyny”.
24 May, 2009 at 8:57 pm
I think the morals of women’s culture is you do whatever you have to do “It’s a man’s world”. Lying is not a problem for women because you do whatever you have to do “It’s a man’s world”. I’m sure it was all very amusing and harmless thirty years ago. But today a lot of judges and lawyers and government leaders are women and they still have the moral relativism of the ingénue arguing her way out of a supermarket altercation. Not funny if one of them has you in their sights in a situation where there is power flowing that can bite you.
24 May, 2009 at 8:59 pm
I get that impression too.
24 May, 2009 at 9:05 pm
Jew Tracer, you haven’t refuted one of my points, and you have only offered doubting statements.
24 May, 2009 at 10:49 pm
You didn’t really make any points, you just said basically, “leave the wimminz alone, it’ll be alright.”
The point about Hitler being pro-feminist is highly dubious and easily refuted.
24 May, 2009 at 10:51 pm
For example;
- He co-opted and controlled feminist movements into the wider Nazi Party.
- He prohibited women from full membership of the Party; thus preventing them from holding office.
- He removed the women’s vote.
- Women could not become judges in the Third Reich.
- He promoted traditional gender roles.
- He promoted the traditional family.
- Childbirth and family was emphasised far more than self-actualisation and career pursuit.
25 May, 2009 at 12:10 am
I can’t help but notice: The very first claim that the feminist made going all the way back to Freidman herself is, being married staying home and raising children is a form of slavery…….and here we are today and Blackshirt is saying the same dam thing!!!!!
25 May, 2009 at 5:59 am
(shaking my head in disbelief) Some of you will never get out of the playpen. What I said, Lee, is that FORCING a woman to be a home maker or house wife is slavery. That’s all. If that happens to coincide with what some kike feminist said, then that is a coincidence and doesn’t mean I support them or their agenda. How is a woman who is FORCED to be mother a good mother? The answer is she probably won’t be. Is that good for the kids?
All I have to say to Jew Tracer is please explain to me Leni Reifenstahl and Hanna Reitsch. If Hitler was so against women outside of tradition gender roles, how come they were able to do what they did?
Alright, I’m done with this. I’ve noticed that no woman has bothered with this conversation, so I’m not going to come to their defense anymore. Perhaps the last ones have already left the site… wouldn’ t surprise me. I’ve explained my position well enough and if some of you guys still don’t get it, then you’re hopeless.
25 May, 2009 at 11:08 am
The really dangerous ones are the minority that are attractive to women, e.g., Marlo “That Girl” Thomas who, with Gloria Steinem started Ms. magazine.
Most business & professional women who manage to support themselves, homeowners association activists, and other local political creatures I’ve encountered are neither particularly bright nor attractive. They tend to be fat, frustrated (often no permanent, real man), furious, and finagling. I don’t consier them women but simple females.
25 May, 2009 at 11:09 am
Well Gentlemen(and Ladies) i am going to venture forth into the minefield of this debate.I generally agree with Herr Blackshirt and his opinion.I can just imagine the look on the faces of the women we’ve recruited into our organization if we told them we expect them to only file paperwork and bake cookies.That bird would NOT fly.Only by including women as Equals in the Struggle,can we get anywhere.I just read an article on the Swedish Far right,and how women compose at least 25% of their membership,if not more.This is a percentage we must reach or surpass here.
Women are the vessel through which more White Warrior males are born,therefore on that basis alone they have inherent value.Our own Unit leader told the women that they are equal to the men in all respects,however,they WILL of their OWN Accord,bake cookies and do “female” type tasks for the unit.Some of them even want to fight,with counter-protestors!We said that anyone who makes it thru the “guys” is fair game for them to pummel,but out of tradition and respect for them,women march WITH US,only in the center of the coloum.Women have strengths and talents we don’t usually have as males,and we believe in letting them use their talents as they see fit “for the Cause”.
Some women are happy playing that “homemaker” role,others are more comfortable in the trenches.Whoever said women are hopeless when it somes to mechanical stuff haven’t met some of our Colorado Redneck Girls who’ll rip the ears off a rabbit(they just hunted) with their teeth,then tare apart the dashboard in their truck without any help from you.Although they ARE or want to be mothers to many White Children.Redneck hill people tend to be tougher overall,men AND women.One of our girls wants to be a Sniper,(when the time comes)and believe you me,she’s a damn good shot.I pity the fool(or groundhog) at the end of her scope.
I also defy any of the Nationalists here if your married guys,to tell us that you run the show at home.From all the Married couples i’ve seen,i think we know who really runs the show.Usually they’re not as strong as us physically,true,but that doesn’t mean they can’t contribute and even be leaders in some way.Also,women can inspire us like no man ever can,in certain circumstances,and we must value them and their contributions.Yes,many of our women are hopelessly brainwashed dipsticks,who focus only on their material wealth(security),but so are many men.Without getting a significant portion of our Women on our side,we definately will lose.In a sense,THEY are the key to our victory over Marxist Tyranny.
25 May, 2009 at 11:54 am
The Red Skull, once again you make the fatal mistake Blackshirt does. You think that toning down and staying quiet about the Feminist Order will win an extra woman or two into the cause, and that will win the battle for us.
No way. It’s with the formation of a new Fascist State that we can start mass recruiting and reaching out to the masses, including the masses of women.
So it’s recruit an extra woman or two, or bring up crucial issues?
There’s no question about what it has to be.
25 May, 2009 at 11:55 am
“In a sense,THEY are the key to our victory over Marxist Tyranny.”
No. Women are the key to the success of Marxist Tyranny.
All Marxists knew/know this.
From democracy to the sexual revolution, the key in kick-starting a revolution to a leftist order is with women.
25 May, 2009 at 12:01 pm
“Only by including women as Equals in the Struggle,can we get anywhere.”
The least you can do is drop the language of the left, with its ambiguous calls to “equality” and “valuing contributions”.
Like Blackshirt, you are willing to let willing off as “brainwashed”, rather than holding them accountable as active participants. This is not good enough either.
We simply have to remove the option of the feminist mindset/lifestyle for women. Given it, they will knowingly and with full awareness take it.
25 May, 2009 at 12:02 pm
“Only by including women as Equals in the Struggle,can we get anywhere.”
The least you can do is drop the language of the left, with its ambiguous calls to “equality” and “valuing contributions”.
Like Blackshirt, you are willing to let women off as “brainwashed”, rather than holding them accountable as active participants. This is not good enough either.
We simply have to remove the option of the feminist mindset/lifestyle for women. Given it, they will knowingly and with full awareness take it. Leading inevitably to the death of our race.
25 May, 2009 at 2:22 pm
You don’t need to say that women should be forced to do this or do that. Once the society is back in the hands of white people and the jew has no influence over our people again. The majority or women will naturally go back to their roll as wives and mothers. Most of the white females I know of childbearing age, would love to marry and have kids. Once the jewish propaganda is gone, biology will prevail.
25 May, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Herr JewTracer,If they are not our “equals” in this Struggle,then just what are they?Our Servants?Our Slaves?Our lackeys?Our “ho’s”?I’m listening for relevant ideas from the Peanut Gallery,which is like liberals-Quick to criticise,but slow to offer alternatives.If we don’t value “their contributions”,in some way, how do we show we appreciate that they are there?I personally feel EVERYONE-Men AND women have something to contribute to the Movement.I think the best thing they(women) provide is Inspiration.Either on a personal or group level.
Either we’re in this together or we’re not.I’m not “letting anyone off” because they’re brainwashed-its merely a FACT of the condition of our People-both sexes.The jews know that to destroy a race,you destroy their women,and unfortunately,their doing a stellar job destroying ours.I don’t see women being any more of a “tool” for the Marxists,anymore than the men are-they are perhaps more vulnerable,depending.The women in the Movement should feel that they are contributing,and that their opinions and concerns are valued-not just taken for granted.That is basic Human(white) decency,not Marxist rhetoric.National Socialism Encourages a “normal” men work/fight women cook/kids role,but society has changed,people are different,women have tasted freedom and for us to deny it to them would be counter-productive.
Also,we DO NOT support “feminism” as much as we value our sisters as real people who can contribute.I would also ask you,which group of males is more motivated to fight hard,-a group with females to protect or the one without?The first person i recruited was a women and i am proud of that fact as she is a cool person and She is already bringing in new people to our group.Not only that but i “saved” her from turning her back on the Movement entirely after rough treatment from some unthinking asshole.This person is the dead-eye shot i mentioned in my earlier post and i would be proud to fight with her in the trenches anytime.
Apparently,we all need to put our “thinking caps” on and figure out whether we want to be Overlord Men Pigs,or be accepting and gracious to our womenfolk.The women also attract more men into the movement,as alot of guys think primarily with their penis when it comes to the opposite sex.What kind of meeting would you rather attend if you were single,WN’s with women around or WN’s without?Also,we cannot “get rid of the Feminist mindset” until we get rid of the jew influence in our society,and even then,it’ll take a few generations to repair the damage done already.Real Commanders work with the Troops they have,not the ones we aspire for someday.Do i want the Women in the Trenches?No.Do i accept that some of them can handle it and WANT to be there?Yes.
None of this is aimed as an “attack” at you Herr JT,but it is imperative we feel,for our survival,to win over as many women as possible to the Movement,as they want to participate and contribute too.I am ready to hear alternative options for how you or others propose to do this.
25 May, 2009 at 2:59 pm
What have women ever invented for the betterment of society? Tampons?
Just as there are intellectual differences between the races, so too are there differences between genders…
Where did all the materialism come from which destroyed the USA? Women and men who buy needless crap to impress these empty heads…
25 May, 2009 at 7:44 pm
The Red Skull Says: “Well Gentlemen (and Ladies) i am going to venture forth into the minefield of this debate. I generally agree with Herr Blackshirt and his opinion.”
And so do I. You make good sense to me. I’ve nothing to add, as you’ve both said it well.
25 May, 2009 at 11:29 pm
From what I’ve seen, the loneliest, unhappiest creatures on Earth are “successful” career gals. They usually have no life outside of their work. No husband (men are understandably turned off by women who are richer and more powerful than they are), no children, no one who really loves them or needs them around. That’s not how Nature intended females to live.
And the fact that there are almost no White females who post on sites like these just proves that women are not interested in “big picture” subjects. They prefer to talk about things that are more trivial or personal in nature, so I’m afraid if we wait for the girls to join our kick-ass White Power Revolution, we’ll be waiting a very long time.
26 May, 2009 at 12:57 am
I usually agree with 99% of what you say Parsifal and I generally agree with this last post of yours. I have to agree with you that these “career women” usually end up pretty pathetic. I think that is why you see so many White women in their late 30s or 40s all of a sudden freaking out because they are childless and they’ve lost their looks. By that time it’s usually too late for them and I see what they become all around me- lonely old ladies living alone, chain smoking and treating their multitude of cats as children.
It is a catastrophe what feminism has done to the majority of our women, but the answer isn’t female bashing. Just like Dr. Pierce advocated and what some of the more inteligent amongst us put into practice, we need to build our own media so we become an alternative mouthpiece to the jews. In that way we can extol the virtues of motherhood and home making for women, so they will WANT to do those occupations and not be FORCED to do them. That is the gist of my entire argument.
“I’m afraid if we wait for the girls to join our kick-ass White Power Revolution, we’ll be waiting a very long time.” You are right in your assessment, but I still feel that we should operate on a level that doesn’t deliberately alienate those women who do feel drawn to our cause. A “He Man Woman Haters Club” is not the way to operate, besides, the White Man and White Woman are a team.
26 May, 2009 at 2:53 am
Herr Blackshirt, sometimes I use misogynistic humor in an ironic way, or at least I attempt to. I’m no woman-hater, but some broads really do drive me up a wall! I guess that’s just the way Nature made them.
I believe the biggest problem is that the traditional roles of men and women are being turned upside down these days and that makes a lot of guys very resentful. In many cases, women now earn more than men do, drive better cars and have better credit ratings. They have college degrees and professional careers, whereas men often have trouble finding even a crummy job nowadays and are sometimes forced to borrow money from their girlfriends or even move back in with their parents.
These are very un-heroic, if not emasculating times for men. Until recently, it was unheard of for a man to have to compete with a woman for the same job. And then to lose that job to the female applicant? How embarassing is that? In a saner world, the woman would be strongly encouraged to follow her natural instincts (unless she is an angry, man-hating, child-hating DYKE) and stay at home to raise a large, healthy White family. But if the Gods intended her for other things, then not even the most patriarchal and conservative of societies would be able to hold her back.
26 May, 2009 at 11:06 am
No kidding these are emasculating times, and feminism/the women’s movement is to blame. One can call it “being resentful” if you like, it does not mean we should not recognise the way things are and identify who is responsible.
26 May, 2009 at 11:10 am
“It is a catastrophe what feminism has done to the majority of our women, but the answer isn’t female bashing.”
But I told you already: feminism is of woman.
At least some woman bashing is necessitated.
To bash feminism is to bash women to some extent, whether you want to face up to that or not.
Once again you are treating woman and feminism as if they are completely separate entities.
Which (1) is an erroneous understanding and (2) holds a responsible group irresponsible.
26 May, 2009 at 11:14 am
“These are very un-heroic, if not emasculating, times for men.”– Parsifal
Right! And it’s going to get worse before it gets any better. I’m afraid, it’s going to HAVE TO before a lot of these brain-dead guys wake up.
“Until recently, it was unheard of for a man to have to compete with a woman for the same job. And then to lose that job to the female applicant? How embarassing is that?”
In my grandparents’ time, it was considered shameful and humiliating for a man’s wife to have to go out and get a job. It was a reflection upon him, that he wasn’t man enough to be able to support his family. In England it was actually illegal to live off the earnings of a woman.
And really, most women (allowing for exceptions) don’t WANT to be career girls in a cut-throat world competing with men. Most WANT to stay at home, be secure and provided for as wives and mothers. As Nature plainly intended. After all, if women won’t be mothers, who will???
26 May, 2009 at 11:17 am
“In that way we can extol the virtues of motherhood and home making for women, so they will WANT to do those occupations and not be FORCED to do them. That is the gist of my entire argument.”
Hmmm… White Men are basically forced to accept the Judeo-Feminist Order.
We have to accept a Jewed/Feminist culture; and there are structures in place to ensure our collective conformance: family court, the media, the law.
These structures can be quite forceful in enforcing the Judeo-Feminist way on White Man.
I say, why not be forceful against Feminist Women and Jews? Why not have structures in place to control their race-and-culture destroying ways?
It seems to me that we’re still caught up in the ideas of liberalism, letting everyone do what they want – which does seem to be a peculiarly White diseased mentality.
The laissez-faire infinite-choices “but let’s hope people make the right ones”, it seems apparent, does not work.
How about a bit of granting White Man a bit of structural force, which he is not afraid to use, for a change.
26 May, 2009 at 11:24 am
“And really, most women (allowing for exceptions) don’t WANT to be career girls in a cut-throat world competing with men. Most WANT to stay at home, be secure and provided for as wives and mothers. As Nature plainly intended. After all, if women won’t be mothers, who will???”
“It takes a village to raise a child . . .”
Feminist theorised that before the Patriarchal Order children were raised in a communitarian manner as opposed to in the nuclear family. I don’t think they were all that wrong in this, and that may well be the future.
Children raised by Mothers and Community, rather than Mothers and Family.
26 May, 2009 at 11:27 am
“A “He Man Woman Haters Club” is not the way to operate, besides, the White Man and White Woman are a team.”
Not in the current Regime they are not, and until the current Regime is overthrown they shall not act as a team.
26 May, 2009 at 11:33 am
Diverting blame away from where it should be placed reeks of the leftist attitude to things.
They blame Bush and Big Oil for Iraq. They blame the Right-Wing Corporate Media for biased reporting.
Obfuscation and misappropriation: the leftist game.
26 May, 2009 at 12:35 pm
But Bush, Big Oil, and Israel ARE to blame for Iraq, Jew Tracer. Or are you one of these conservative types that believes the Iraq War was necessary? Personally I don’t care, because anything that weakens ZOG is good, and the Iraq War is weakening ZOG.
26 May, 2009 at 1:48 pm
Guys most of these so called females are smart enough to be there — granted they lick Jews’ carrot. But guys guess what most of “regular users” of this site are downloading porno and jerking off in their moms’ basement.
26 May, 2009 at 2:41 pm
We’ll never have a woman president with that kind of attitude, tina…walk it off!
Pelosi-failure
Merkel-failure
Rice-failure
26 May, 2009 at 3:26 pm
I recently saw a TV report where the fat, uncouth-looking slob being interviewed was whining that his wife got fired from her job. “How we gonna pay all our bills now that my wife’s outta work?” he asked the female Oriental reporter. “I don’t make enuff money at my job to pay all them bills, no how.” In Russia, he would have been laughed out of town for being so godamned pathetic and un-manly. Here, he gets free air time and a shoulder to cry on. Krushchev was right, the Russians will bury us. And we deserve it.
26 May, 2009 at 4:27 pm
Tina makes a fair point.
WNs hail the internet as a great bastion of free speech, but perhaps its primary use is the dissemination degeneracy in the form of universally accessible pornography.
This too is something we should be willing to tackle.
26 May, 2009 at 4:34 pm
“But Bush, Big Oil, and Israel ARE to blame for Iraq, Jew Tracer.”
Incorrect again Blackshirt. Only Israel is to blame for the War in Iraq.
The rest were simply co-opted into the exercise, and in controlled-media and leftist critiques of the war, held as the primary instigators when they were not.
“Or are you one of these conservative types that believes the Iraq War was necessary?”
Why would you assume that? I absolute oppose the Iraq War. It was completely unnecessary.
You erroneously denote “conservative types” as being for the war when it was in fact Jewish Zionist Neo-Cons.
It’s another controlled-media/leftist thought loop: the idea that conservatives push for and agreed with the War in Iraq.
“Personally I don’t care, because anything that weakens ZOG is good, and the Iraq War is weakening ZOG.”
Oh my. What great wisdom do you have in store for us next Blackshirt?
26 May, 2009 at 4:45 pm
Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.
Israeli Foreign Policy document presented first to Bill Clinton in 1996 (who rejected it).
Authorised by then-Prime Minister Benjamin Nethanyahu.
Written by Jews such as Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and David Wurmser who went on to secure important positions in GWB’s Administration.
“We must distinguish soberly and clearly friend from foe. We must make sure that our friends across the Middle East never doubt the solidity or value of our friendship.
Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.
Forging A New U.S.-Israeli Relationship
In recent years, Israel invited active U.S. intervention in Israel’s domestic and foreign policy for two reasons: to overcome domestic opposition to “land for peace” concessions the Israeli public could not digest, and to lure Arabs — through money, forgiveness of past sins, and access to U.S. weapons — to negotiate. This strategy, which required funneling American money to repressive and aggressive regimes, was risky, expensive, and very costly for both the U.S. and Israel, and placed the United States in roles is should neither have nor want.
Israel can make a clean break from the past and establish a new vision for the U.S.-Israeli partnership based on self-reliance, maturity and mutuality — not one focused narrowly on territorial disputes. Israel’s new strategy — based on a shared philosophy of peace through strength — reflects continuity with Western values by stressing that Israel is self-reliant, does not need U.S. troops in any capacity to defend it, including on the Golan Heights, and can manage its own affairs. Such self-reliance will grant Israel greater freedom of action and remove a significant lever of pressure used against it in the past.
To reinforce this point, the Prime Minister can use his forthcoming visit to announce that Israel is now mature enough to cut itself free immediately from at least U.S. economic aid and loan guarantees at least, which prevent economic reform. [Military aid is separated for the moment until adequate arrangements can be made to ensure that Israel will not encounter supply problems in the means to defend itself].
Israel can under these conditions better cooperate with the U.S. to counter real threats to the region and the West’s security. Mr. Netanyahu can highlight his desire to cooperate more closely with the United States on anti-missile defense in order to remove the threat of blackmail which even a weak and distant army can pose to either state. Not only would such cooperation on missile defense counter a tangible physical threat to Israel’s survival, but it would broaden Israel’s base of support among many in the United States Congress who may know little about Israel, but care very much about missile defense. Such broad support could be helpful in the effort to move the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.
To anticipate U.S. reactions and plan ways to manage and constrain those reactions, Prime Minister Netanyahu can formulate the policies and stress themes he favors in language familiar to the Americans by tapping into themes of American administrations during the Cold War which apply well to Israel. If Israel wants to test certain propositions that require a benign American reaction, then the best time to do so is before November, 1996.
Israel will not only contain its foes; it will transcend them. “
That you think the War in Iraq hurts ZOG (i.e. Jews/Israel) is nothing less than ignorance, Blackshirt.
26 May, 2009 at 5:43 pm
“Explain Riefenstahl,” Blackshirt? Jewtracer gave you a very good list that showed how Hitler was anti-feminist. And you counter by saying that if he was, then Riefenstahl wouldn’t have been employed? He could recognize talent when he saw it.
26 May, 2009 at 7:58 pm
Yes Dante, I know… Hitler was all powerful and a demi-god. LOL It was ok for him to contradict himself since he was the supreme being.
28 May, 2009 at 4:44 pm
Observe the cunning leftist Mike Jahn in action:
“Diverting blame away from where it should be placed reeks of the leftist attitude to things.
They blame Bush and Big Oil for Iraq. They blame the Right-Wing Corporate Media for biased reporting.
Obfuscation and misappropriation: the leftist game.”
This is true and it also describes the anti troll Jahn’s game here. Observe:
“But Bush, Big Oil, and Israel ARE to blame for Iraq, Jew Tracer.”
See that Jahn drops ‘Israel’ in there even though JewTracer didn’t mention Israel in his description of the leftist game. Jahn wrongly implied that JewTracer was exonerating Israel. Jahn wanted to push his ‘big oil and Bush to blame’ left-wing views and thought including ‘Israel’ alongside them would hide his left-wing views. Wrong. Mixing truth and lies is a jewish and LEFT-WING tactic. Jahn always does this, ‘correcting’ people for exposing the left.
Now watch Mike ‘anyone who challenges my left-wing views is a Conservative’ Jahn continue:
“Or are you one of these conservative types that believes the Iraq War was necessary?”
SAY WHAT??? When did Jew Tracer say or even hint that he is a Conservative who supports the Iraq war? How likely would that be from someone called ‘Jew Tracer’ who posts on a WN forum? Calling people ‘Conservatives’ for not buying into leftist propaganda is CLASSIC Mike Jahn.
No more proof is required that Jahn is a left-winger and anti disruptor who is here at VNN, along with many others, to push WN to leftism. This thread and all the others he has posted marxist crap on in the last few days have shown him for what he really is.
“Personally I don’t care, because anything that weakens ZOG is good, and the Iraq War is weakening ZOG.”
You do care because you made the smear and posted it, marxist.
“Krushchev was right, the Russians will bury us. And we deserve it.”
You would think that the jew communists, not ‘Russians’, were right and that America ‘deserves it’, Kike Jewn.
29 May, 2009 at 1:28 am
Herr Blackshirt, I’m afraid that Tom is just too clever for you, I mean us, I mean…..well anyway, nice work, McCreen. You have single-handedly exposed the old “Blackshirt/Parsifal one Jew/Marxist/Mike Jahn/sock-puppet holding an imaginary conversation with itself by pretending to be two different people using two different IP addresses at the same time” trick. What gave us, I mean me, I mean him, away?
29 May, 2009 at 9:42 am
I didn’t expose you Mike Jahn, you exposed yourself and you do it with almost every post.
30 May, 2009 at 9:17 am
“The West was built by men and they must lead it or it will spoil” Really? Tell that to Catherine the Great, Elizabeth 1, Queen Victoria, Boudicca, and Maria Theresa. C’mon Socrates, don’t you know your history?”
Feminist Mike Jahn thinks that a handful of female exceptions means that the West was not built by White men!
“All you are going to get is the usual crowd of misogynists who will come out of the woodwork and say “women belong in the kitchen and pregnant” etc. etc. Look guys, the 1950s ideal of the obedient housewife who lives to serve her husband never was the reality for all women at the time and it won’t ever become the reality again”
Misogynists? 1950s? Never be reality again? That’s kike-leftist propaganda. Really low to use ‘misogynists’, that’s the kind of thing jews and leftists do. But Jahn the feminist hypocrite thinks it’s ok to post things like ‘beer-swilling morons’, ‘he-man woman haters’ etc.
“What some of you are advocating is just a form of slavery. It is my opinion that our women shouldn’t be forced to be mothers or home-makers”
Home-makers and motherhood = ‘slavery’. More far-left feminism and lies.
“But if the Gods intended her for other things, then not even the most patriarchal and conservative of societies would be able to hold her back.”
Patriarchal?? Conservative??? This guy is a piece of work isn’t he? Still kidding himself that somebody here accepts him as some kind of White nationalist – he couldn’t be anymore of a far-left nut.
30 May, 2009 at 1:10 pm
“. . .Observe the cunning leftist. . .”
He is a cunning linguist.
30 May, 2009 at 2:00 pm
“He is a cunning linguist.”
LOL on this page his comments are like those of a carpet muncher.
30 May, 2009 at 4:29 pm
“The West was built by men and they must lead it or it will spoil” Really? Tell that to Catherine the Great, Elizabeth 1, Queen Victoria, Boudicca, and Maria Theresa. C’mon Socrates, don’t you know your history?”
Well, at least he didn’t include Janis Joplin!
30 May, 2009 at 5:09 pm
Well. her group was Big Brother and the Holding Company.
She invented the business-government partnership, for the first time in history.