13 September, 2009
Women’s Magazines
Posted by Socrates in AmeriKwa, General Decline, jewed culture, media, media control, media criticism, Socrates, women, women and materialism at 2:36 pm | 
Permanent Link
A female relative bought something interesting and I had the misfortune of looking at it. Try this: go check out a women’s magazine – one of those thick, heavy ones found on magazine stands. The first thing you’ll notice is that it’s made up almost entirely of advertisements for Jewish cosmetics or Jewish clothing[1]. Very little of it is devoted to articles or text. It’s a bunch of ads posing as a magazine. Clever. The fact that women actually buy these meaningless, materialistic rags says a lot about them but nothing good.
[1] “almost entirely” = at least 90% of the magazine
13 September, 2009 at 4:57 pm
Another of their specialities…
13 September, 2009 at 5:24 pm
“The fact that women actually buy these meaningless, materialistic rags says a lot about them but nothing good.”
That statement from you says alot about what you think about White women, Socrates. I’m not arguing that these women’s magazines are good, but it isn’t our women’s fault that Jews push this stuff, it is what has been pushed on our women from the cradle to the grave.
What about all the White men who buy shitloads of sports magazines featuring meaningless sports stats and stories on their favorite pet negro sports stars? (not to mention several entire sports networks on the Televitz devoted to moronic White males cheering nigger ball players). You could apply Socrates statement to American White men as follows: “The fact that MEN actually buy these meaningless, sports rags says a lot about them but nothing good.”
The masses, men and women, have always been sheep. Don’t blame the sheep for following whoever is the shepherd. We’ve allowed our enemies to become the shepherds of our sheep, and we’ve got to change that. In the meantime, let’s not start the He- Man “Woman Hatefest” that does nothing but turn our women against our cause.
13 September, 2009 at 5:27 pm
“The first thing you’ll notice is that it’s made up almost entirely of advertisements for Jewish cosmetics or Jewish clothing[1]. Very little of it is devoted to articles or text. It’s a bunch of ads posing as a magazine.”
So true.
Who needs shoes costing hundreds of dollars, or handbags costing even thousands, all because of some pretentious label that’s supposed to impress others? Or perfume and cosmetics containing some mysterious glop costing perhaps a few cents, then packaged in a fancy bottle and sold for thousands of percent markup? It’s sheer nonsense for those who have money money than brains!
These high-markup items give us nothing of social value. Better to buy a sack of potatoes and at least get your money’s worth. The Jews are skimming the cream off society, giving nothing of value in return, and laughing all the way to the bank. They grow rich by selling us frivolities. It’s just one step short of legitimized robbery.
And with clothing, those ever-changing fashions will be out of style next year and will have to be replaced endlessly with more of the same. Ad infinitum. Those foolish women who try to keep up with “fashion” are kept running on a perpetual treadmill. It’s all a racket that takes advantage of the gullible, and those with too much money to burn. As I said, more dollars than sense!
Once you become aware of these things and start to notice, it’s simply amazing how totally they (Jews) pervade and control every tiny niche of our economy, our culture, our minds, and our lives. At least of those of us who let them. And, sadly, that means most.
13 September, 2009 at 5:30 pm
I meant to write: It’s sheer nonsense, for those who have money money than brains!
13 September, 2009 at 5:32 pm
I meant MORE money than brains. Damn it!
13 September, 2009 at 5:38 pm
‘Women’s magazines’…it just sounds like a code for certain propaganda targetting women.
You don’t even need to buy one, simply walk past the magazines section and observe all the salacious and extreme headlines from the stories these rags print.
‘Real life!’ scream the jews.
13 September, 2009 at 6:04 pm
Speaking of jews and adverts, jews control the advertising world directly or by whining:
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/98441/Fury-as-BMW-advert-leaves-a-Nazi-taste/
Quote:
“I’m not arguing that these women’s magazines are good, but it isn’t our women’s fault that Jews push this stuff, it is what has been pushed on our women from the cradle to the grave.”
Er, that’s the same with the Churches and the zionist Scofield Bible, for example. Why the double-standards?
“You could apply Socrates statement to American White men as follows: “The fact that MEN actually buy these meaningless, sports rags says a lot about them but nothing good.”
So everyone here must respect the limits laid down by Blackshirt; it’s ok to constantly attack all Christians, Conservatives and White male sports fans all the time but not women or any other Blackshirt pet groups.
“Don’t blame the sheep for following whoever is the shepherd. We’ve allowed our enemies to become the shepherds of our sheep, and we’ve got to change that.”
Except for Christians, Conservatives and any other group ‘Blackshirt’ hates. Your position is inconsistent and hypocritical. Either we recognise that all our people have been misled or we attack them all. No group or section of people should be totally beyond our criticism.
“In the meantime, let’s not start the He- Man “Woman Hatefest” that does nothing but turn our women against our cause.”
But relentless posting (‘every chance I get’ as you said) of hatefests trying to drive off any, let’s say Christian, WNs who have been with VNN since the start is perfectly ok? Or how about WNs who criticise the 1960s?
That’s an obviously hypocritical position.
13 September, 2009 at 6:16 pm
“But relentless posting (’every chance I get’ as you said) of hatefests trying to drive off any, let’s say Christian, WNs who have been with VNN since the start is perfectly ok? Or how about WNs who criticise the 1960s?”
Your logic is faulty as usual, McWeenie.
We need White racist women to procreate with and to work as partners in our struggle. Since you cannot be a racist and a Christian at the same time, we do not need Christians… I’m not worried about driving them off, nor and I worried about offending their sensibilities. To compare my opinions on “women” to my opinions on “Christians” is faulty logic since “women” are human beings and Christianity is a mental illness that afflicts human beings. There is no comparison.
13 September, 2009 at 6:21 pm
“Except for Christians, Conservatives and any other group ‘Blackshirt’ hates. Your position is inconsistent and hypocritical. Either we recognise that all our people have been misled or we attack them all. No group or section of people should be totally beyond our criticism.”
The difference between us McReen is that you attack “leftist” Whites mercilessly, but are strangely silent when it comes to your friends who are Christians and Conservatives, why is that?
13 September, 2009 at 10:57 pm
I don’t think posting about women’s magazines says anything at all about Socrates’ view of women.
The fact that these rags sell by the millions says nothing good about women. True.
I sure don’t think I’ve ever heard socrates say anything kind about the followers of assorted niggerball media.
The same words do indeed as you point out apply to such men too.
13 September, 2009 at 10:58 pm
Most of these mags are published and edited by jews too.
13 September, 2009 at 11:19 pm
But wait a second here…..Yes, there are many stupid, trashy magazines for men that are devoted to niggerball and puss-ah, BUT there are also many SERIOUS male-oriented magazines like Popular Science, National Geographic and Popular Mechanics. Where are the serious magazines for broads, hmmm?
13 September, 2009 at 11:34 pm
I guess the closest thing to serious magazines for women would be Redbook and Ladies Home Journal. I’ve never read those publications, but I suspect they’re mostly full of recipes for carrot-cake and reader-submitted poems about menopause.
14 September, 2009 at 12:24 am
“I don’t think posting about women’s magazines says anything at all about Socrates’ view of women. The fact that these rags sell by the millions says nothing good about women. True. I sure don’t think I’ve ever heard socrates say anything kind about the followers of assorted niggerball media. The same words do indeed as you point out apply to such men too.”
2050, your points are well taken. True, I have never heard Socrates post anything kind about sports obsessed White men, but then again I don’t think I remember any topics being put up specifically pointing out spectator sports being an issue. (I may be incorrect about this, and I welcome any info proving otherwise)
What I have noticed during my couple years on this forum has been more than a few of what I would classify as overly negative topics regarding White women and their habits. Now, I’m no male feminist, but I can see how this sort of thing comes across to female associates of mine. I’m just as pissed off about what has happened to White women in this Jewish-run global village as any other White man would be, but I certainly don’t advocate putting women back into a system where they are virtual slaves to their husbands. In my years in the White “movement” I’ve come to feel there are many, many, White Nationalists who want that, and I believe that is wrong. The subjugation of women into virtual slavery to a husband is very Jewish. It all goes back to the Old Testament of the Jewish bible.
But back to the issue of Jewish media… what I’d like to see is Socrates post a topic for once that points out the Jewish mind control of White males through spectator sports. This I think is a far more important and consequential problem for our race than white women perusing fashion magazines. After all, how many white women have been given the mental “green light” to love negroids though watching their husbands, sons, and brothers drooling and cheering their favorite muscular coon ball player? How can we White men expect our women to see the muds as the threats they are when a large population of WHITE MEN holds these subhumans up as heroes? I can’t tell you how sick I become every time I see a White man coaching his son on how great this or that coon ball player is on the TV. This is a major problem and sickness, and we need to address it.
14 September, 2009 at 2:05 am
Maybe I’m wrong, but I get the sense that a lot of White sports fans are cooling off in their enthusiasm for niggerball games. All those millionaire ball-throwing coons constantly getting in trouble with the law and blowing their cash at Miami strip clubs………….Surely White dads don’t want their little boys looking up to those spoiled, out-of-control Black assholes as heroes? I predict that advanced video games will eventually replace niggerball as the White sports fan’s primary source of entertainment.
14 September, 2009 at 2:31 am
Blackshirt Says:
After all, how many white women have been given the mental “green light” to love negroids though watching their husbands, sons, and brothers drooling and cheering their favorite muscular coon ball player? How can we White men expect our women to see the muds as the threats they are when a large population of WHITE MEN holds these subhumans up as heroes? I can’t tell you how sick I become every time I see a White man coaching his son on how great this or that coon ball player is on the TV. This is a major problem and sickness, and we need to address it.
Quite right. It’s also important to keep in mind that women, on the whole, are far less racist than men, and that this is a natural result both of evolution and the facts of sexual reproduction. To wit: A woman is always guaranteed that she is the mother of her baby and will pass on her genes, even if the father is a disgusting subhuman groid. Not so with men. They are guaranteed nothing. In order to pass on their genes, the men must always compete against other men for reproductive access to the women. Male racism helps ensure that the male’s racial group is selected for, as the prosperity and status of the male’s racial group affects his own individual reproductive chances.
The sexes are affected differently in war as well as peace. In war, women always become the property of the victors. In such a situation, woman’s duty, from the point of view of her genes, is only to survive. Consequently, whether they like it or not, or whether morality approves or not, women of a defeated race will bed down with the butchers of their former husbands, brothers, and fathers. Even in peace, white women willingly miscegenating with niggers, spics, Jews, and other mudmen is an all too common sight. As the mud’s status has been allowed to rise in the white world, this is an expected result, as women instinctively seek to enhance their reproductive chances by affiliating themselves with a high-status male of any race. Although many women are weakly racist, strong racism is unusual in them. From the point of view of the woman’s genes, strong racism would be counter-productive, since it would disqualify her from breeding with males from an ascendant race that is not her own. When non-white males are allowed to circulate freely among them, engaging in courting behavior and propositioning them at will, white women intuitively sense weakness on the part of white males; they sense that the non-whites are ascendant, and that the white males have lost status. It could be said that race-mixing white women are betting with their vaginas, wagering that the males of their own race will be defeated. They are trying to enhance their own individual reproductive fitness by genetically assimilating themselves to the victors.
To sum up, women maximize their reproductive fitness by surviving and breeding with high-status men of any race, while men do so by winning the (sometimes racial) competition with other men.
14 September, 2009 at 2:56 am
Blech. I never look at those things! Mind-rotting GARBAGE. And I admit before my racial awakening I used to dress like a slut just like all the other girls in my school, but now I try to clothe myself more modestly. My parents wonder why I wear long (below the knee) dresses these days – I think they believe I’m turning into a CHRISTIAN! HA!
——————————
Adam said: Although many women are weakly racist, strong racism is unusual in them. From the point of view of the woman’s genes, strong racism would be counter-productive, since it would disqualify her from breeding with males from an ascendant race that is not her own.
I must be unusual then, Adam, as I would rather cut out my own uterus with a rusty butterknife or BOOM! HEADSHOT myself before I would get busy with a kike, a spic or *BLAAAARRGGHH* a bubble-lipped, blue gummed buck nigger! So not just NO but HELLS NO, in my case at least!
14 September, 2009 at 3:16 am
women of a defeated race will bed down with the butchers of their former husbands, brothers, and fathers…women instinctively seek to enhance their reproductive chances by affiliating themselves with a high-status male of any race…. From the point of view of the woman’s genes, strong racism would be counter-productive, since it would disqualify her from breeding with males of an ascendant race that is not her own.
When non-white males are allowed to circulate freely among them, engaging in courting behavior and propositioning them at will, white women intuitively sense weakness on the part of [their own] white males; they sense that the non-whites are ascendant … they try to enhance their own individual reproductive fitness by genetically assimilating themselves to the victors. .. To sum up, women maximize their reproductive fitness by surviving and breeding with high-status men of any race.
Brilliant insights from Adam! Thank you, Adam. You summed it up well. In the end, it’s all biology. We’re just animals built of bone and blood, after all. Get your genes into the next generation any way you can. And make the best match you can. Mother Nature isn’t scrupulous. She only rewards success.
14 September, 2009 at 3:26 am
I can appreciate Irma’s revulsion at the thought. Good for her! But the simple, and veryobservable, fact is that MANY other white girls do not share her revulsion. (They probably don’t share her intelligence too, but that is another matter.)
Just stroll through any shopping mall on a Saturday afternoon. If you don’t see them (the culprits and race traitors) with their black hubbies/boyfriends, you’ll certainly see them with their little wooly-headed mementos of a night of drunken indiscretion. Afromania! It’s their mark of shame worse than a scarlet “A” that they will never be able to erase or forget. They are doomed to live with it long after the Afro-drone has disappeared on to his next conquests.
14 September, 2009 at 5:36 am
“As the mud’s status has been allowed to rise in the white world, this is an expected result, as women instinctively seek to enhance their reproductive chances by affiliating themselves with a high-status male of any race.”
******************************************************
I don’t know if this is really true, man. I have seen lots of smart, beautiful, successful White women dating low-class, good-for-nothing niggers, Mexiscum, sleazy Jewboys and even South Pacific slopes who like to smack their girlfriends around. Those dames may have looks, dough and brains, but they have no friggin’ clue when it comes to finding a suitable mate.
14 September, 2009 at 6:41 am
Ditto all.
If you think women’s magazines are genocidal horsesh*t you should see the crap that white male goys slurp up. They spend their whole lives drenched in jewish owned liquor cheering for niggers so they can impregnate their daughters with AIDs after the game. Good move, slick.
14 September, 2009 at 7:43 am
As much as I hear of massive lay offs and other signs the economy is going down the toilet I still see niggerball stadiums packed to capacity so either kwans are sacrificing in other areas of their life to continue their fanatical devotion to niggerball games or the economy isn’t really that bad.
Considering how one is gouged at these stadiums from parking to a price of a hot dog I would think this is the first things people would scale back on.
14 September, 2009 at 1:22 pm
“I’m not arguing that these women’s magazines are good, but it isn’t our women’s fault that Jews push this stuff, it is what has been pushed on our women from the cradle to the grave.”
As a self-confessed former women’s magazine addict, I have to disagree. If women didn’t buy them, there would be no need to produce them. Supply and demand.
14 September, 2009 at 1:27 pm
Any White man who would still drive to a stadium or arena to see a niggerball game, fork over 50 bucks for parking, 100 bucks for the ticket, 20 bucks for a semi-frozen hot dog and styrofoam cup of watered-down beer and another 100 bucks to buy some ill-fitting, Chink-made “officially licensed” sports jersey or ball cap DESERVES TO BE CARJACKED AND SHOT DEAD BY FERAL NIGGERS on his way home.
14 September, 2009 at 2:34 pm
“As the mud’s status has been allowed to rise in the white world, this is an expected result, as women instinctively seek to enhance their reproductive chances by affiliating themselves with a high-status male of any race.”
******************************************************
I don’t know if this is really true, man. I have seen lots of smart, beautiful, successful White women dating low-class, good-for-nothing niggers, Mexiscum, sleazy Jewboys and even South Pacific slopes who like to smack their girlfriends around. Those dames may have looks, dough and brains, but they have no friggin’ clue when it comes to finding a suitable mate.
Smart, successful, beautiful young white women pairing up with niggers and other mudmen? I’m sure that phenomenon exists, but I haven’t seen what I’d call a lot of it. In my experience, women are extremely status-conscious, although “status” is a slippery concept that doesn’t have to map well onto what you, as a man, might think it ought to. It doesn’t have anything necessarily to do with the man having money, for instance, or intelligence. The status that women seek and acquire from men is what we could call their alpha male status. Women want to pair up with an alpha male and bear his offspring, because they sense he is more likely to be able to provide protection, food, and other necessities than a low-status male. High status in the father helps insure survival of the offspring. Women know an alpha male instinctively, and a swaggering nigger buck can have that status in her eyes nowadays as easily as a well-to-do white man, or perhaps even more easily. Women are also guided minutely in their choices by what other women think of as “hot”, and hotness and high status go hand in hand. High status = hot, and low status = not hot. If all of her girlfriends are telling her that some disgusting, violent, retarded nigger is hot, she’ll usually start to think about copulating with it.
I am also trying to convey the herd-like nature of human behavior. For example, in many other species the males try to assemble a harem, or at a minimum ensure themselves exclusive breeding rights with just one female. Consequently, throughout the animal kingdom, a lot of male behavior has to do with keeping other males physically away from the female(s) that have been secured. In deer and elk, for example, the bucks will fight each other for possession of the females, and run off other males who attempt to approach their harem. Males who can defeat the reigning male can take possession of the females. On an instinctual level, a swaggering nigger buck who can stroll into the middle of the white “herd” and begin courting behavior with white women appears to them as an alpha male who has defeated the white man who used to have them as his exclusive property. The nigger now gets alpha male status because the white man could not stop his approach. Just by his presence he makes the white man look weak, and that equates to lowered status. All of these assessments and re-assessments of the situation take place on an instinctive, pre-cognitive level, of course. The people involved may not even be aware of them, and may deny that they exist at all.
In any event, what I am trying to describe here is the general rule, not the exceptional case. It must also be granted that the existence of modern forms of scientific birth control undoubtedly makes human females more willing to experiment with miscegenation than they used to be.
14 September, 2009 at 3:39 pm
Smart, successful, beautiful young white women pairing up with niggers and other mudmen? I’m sure that phenomenon exists, but I haven’t seen what I’d call a lot of it. In my experience, women are extremely status-conscious
Excellent insights, Adam! I must agree. In my own experience, I haven’t seen it either. I’ve seen classy white women with unappetizing blacks who have money, but not with bums.
“High status in the father helps insure survival of the offspring. Women know an alpha male instinctively, and a swaggering nigger buck can have that status in her eyes. Women are also guided minutely in their choices by what other women think.”
This makes sense to me. Females are fickle. They want the strongest, richest man. Status is VERY important to them, though they may deny it or not even be aware of it. Look at fairy tales like Cinderella or the Sleeping Beauty; they reveal a lot about subconscious desires. They are all concerned with finding their prince. None of them want the footman. And though white men may hate the fact, women’s first loyalty is above all to their offspring. Her primary biological goal is to secure the most advantageous mate to protect her and provide for those offspring. We see this through the animal kingdom.
“a swaggering nigger buck who can stroll into the middle of the white “herd” and begin courting behavior with white women appears to them as an alpha male who has defeated the white man who used to have them as his exclusive property. The nigger now gets alpha male status because the white man could not stop his approach.”
Yes. A lot of blacks try to fake it. Some do it successfully. But it’s all the more true when that swaggering buck is not faking it, but does indeed have money and status. BIG money and status, too! This phenomenon being largely thanks to our Jewish-run sports and entertainment “industries” which have elevated such cretins into millionaires and celebrities. Would Nicole Brown have married OJ or given him a second glance if he were pushing a broom or flipping burgers? She would have told the bum to get lost!
14 September, 2009 at 4:06 pm
Ein says:
Brilliant insights from Adam! Thank you, Adam. You summed it up well. In the end, it’s all biology. We’re just animals built of bone and blood, after all. Get your genes into the next generation any way you can. And make the best match you can. Mother Nature isn’t scrupulous. She only rewards success.
Thank you, Ein.
Human conceits aside, we are indeed just animals, and evolution isn’t directional. If being a stinking, violent, retarded groid is what white women are buying, then that’s where humanity is headed. Opinion on this has reversed 180 degrees over the course of the last century. In 1909, the vast majority of white women would have been nauseated at the very thought of a nigger touching them, much less having sex with one or bearing his offspring. A hundred years later, in 2009, and you will probably have to seek for days to find even one woman who would come out and tell you to your face that she would categorically rule it out. (Excepting our dear Irma, of course, and a few other white women here.) After a century of “progress” and integration, white women envisioning themselves as willing and able to copulate with nigger beasts and bear their offspring is thought to be the only enlightened point of view.
14 September, 2009 at 4:37 pm
“. . .After a century of “progress” and integration. . .”
Dis-integration. “Integration” is enemy terminology.
14 September, 2009 at 7:17 pm
Really great insights, Adam. Everyone else added good input, as well. I’m glad to see I’m not the only one that recognizes that big jew works his magic on White males via sports just like he does on our women through “fashion”. Although the power that the Jews have over White men through spectator sports is far more dangerous in my opinion.
We as White men bare a good deal of the responsibility over what has happened to our women, since they are indeed the weaker sex and it is our responsibility to protect them.
14 September, 2009 at 9:19 pm
Good points by Blackshirt. In my opinion, whites are not “leftist” because they criticize Christianity or Conservatives. To me, one cannot be part of the radical right without attacking these sacred cows. One could even argue that the labels “right wing” and “left wing” are quite irrelevant. All that matters for the white race is that our thinking is rooted in reason, corresponding to the unalterable laws of nature.
14 September, 2009 at 9:55 pm
“we are indeed just animals, and evolution isn’t directional. If being a stinking, violent, retarded groid is what white women are buying, then that’s where humanity is headed.”
That is another very perceptive point, Adam. Many peoople take progress for granted. They assume we are moving upward and onward forever. Straight up to the stars. Nonsense! Thery are wrong. Nothing is guaranteed.
There is no such thing as automatic progress. There is evolution and there is devolution. There is progress and there is regress. There is upward and there is downward. We can go in any direcftion at all. Right now, we are headed in the wrong direction. We are racially regressing. …regressing very badly and very rapidly. The evolutionary gains that took us many thousands of years of selection and suffering to achieve are being wiped out in a few generations by a few starry-eyed idealists, political fanatics, religious nuts, gold-diggers, and crackheads. What they are doing, in evolutionary terms, is a crime against nature..
14 September, 2009 at 10:17 pm
Blackshirt to the rescue with his PC sermonizing, right on cue.
15 September, 2009 at 12:22 am
There are obviously some people posting here whose lives are even more sheltered from the harsh, ugly realities of the World than I imagined………………Must not despair, must press forward……………………..
I’m afraid I will have to insist that it’s still true, ie, that there are an unusually large number of attractive/smart/successful (or some combination thereof) White women these days who are sleeping with BUMS. Black bums, Slope bums, Mestizo bums, girlfriend-smacking bums, bums with no job who are always borrowing money from their girlfriends.
But why? Why would these desirable, superior White women associate with such scum? Well, there’s no more White dad around these days to discipline them, for one thing. He’s no longer there to tell them the difference between right and wrong, since these women don’t have enough God-given sense to figure that out for themselves. And many such sought-after women are attracted to “bad boys”, ie, lowlifes who are initally a lot more fun to be with than nerdy, hardworking, responsible type males. Secret issues with low self-esteem, perhaps? Victims of incest? An misdirected Evolutionary desire to mate with “alpha males”? It is a perplexing social phenomenon.
Whatatever the reason, I still believe such foolish women get what they deserve when they are inevitably found dead or broke or beaten to within an inch of their lives by their scumbag boyfriends. Nature does not suffer such fools gladly.
15 September, 2009 at 2:23 pm
Tim McGreen Says:
But why? Why would these desirable, superior White women associate with such scum?
Because they can. Our task as white men is to keep the scum away from them, and in that, we have failed.
Whatatever the reason, I still believe such foolish women get what they deserve when they are inevitably found dead or broke or beaten to within an inch of their lives by their scumbag boyfriends. Nature does not suffer such fools gladly.
Whatever happens will have some good aspects and some bad ones for us. But we shouldn’t confuse our reaction to the facts with the facts themselves. Even when a white woman such as Nicole Simpson is nearly decapitated by her pet monkey, some good results from it, it’s true. But the bare fact of the matter is that a white female, along with her reproductive potential, was lost to the white race. If she had been kept away from niggers, then instead of squeezing out half-breed monstrosities and setting a bad example for the other girls, she might have had some beautiful white children and been a good wife to some white man.
Woman is capricious, childlike, and easily led astray, but through her gateway came all of our ancestors, and will come all of our posterity. The white woman is the temple of our race, and the white man is the priest. It is the duty of the priest to guard the temple. If the temple is destroyed, who shall we blame?
16 September, 2009 at 3:36 am
As others have noted here, kikery ALWAYS seeks to subvert White woman because by contributing to the ruin of White women organized kikery can more easily triumph over White men.
Feminism, which is nowadays led almost entirely by over-educated urban Jewish women, is nothing more than a giant kike project to subvert White womanhood —> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Jewish_feminists
16 September, 2009 at 4:11 am
“The white woman is the temple of our race, and the white man is the priest. It is the duty of the priest to guard the temple. If the temple is destroyed, whom shall we blame?”
Well said again Adam!
Even primitive desert tribes, Afghans, Arabs, Somalis, all jealously guard their women and keep them strictly away from foreign men. Despite their backwardness, squalor, and lack of education or modernity, they still have some basic intuitive wisdom that we have forgotten, with all our universities, automobiles, airplanes, skyscrapers, and computers.
The way things are presently going, they and their genes will still be here and will inherit the earth, long after we have vanished.
16 September, 2009 at 4:43 am
Adam:”The white woman is the temple of our race, and the white man is the priest.”
That’s a very eloquent statement, and it will make a great rallying cry in the coming rise of White nationalism in the USA.
16 September, 2009 at 4:55 am
I think some of you are over-stating the amount of race-mixing that is happening in the USA and other White nations. Yes some race-mixing occurs, but not as much as you’d think; various scientific studies have proven that overall Whites still overwhelmingly breed with other Whites only. Also, if you just look around at White couples and families you know or see in your area, only a very small amount of them are of mixed-race background.
The fact of the matter is that the vast majority of White women who date, screw, or marry Black men or any non-White men are what is commonly called ‘White trash.’ If you survey the White women who date/screw/marry Black men, you’ll find that nearly all of them are severely defective in many ways, i.e. ugly, fat, stupid/uneducated, poor, boring, drug addicts, mentally ill, etc. There are very occasional exceptions to this (Heidi Klum is one), but those are of course very rare.
Thus the loss of these ‘mudsharks’ to the White race has a decidedly eugenic effect on the White gene pool which is actually enriched by their absence. The inferior genes of these ‘dirty Black fuckers’ won’t be missed by the White gene pool, which is being made stronger, better, and more ethnocentric by their leaving it: think of how gold and other valuable materials are refined in a blazing furnace.
Again, through race-mixing, the overall White gene pool is getting rid of its weakest and most defective pro-race-mixing elements by having the weakest and least ethnocentric Whites leave the White gene pool to breed with the non-Whites. This isn’t much of a problem since the problem is still comparatively very small, and as I write above this is in fact a good thing since it is making the White gene pool stronger and more ethnocentric in time since so many of these defective race-mixers are being entirely bred-out of the White gene pool in these times of extreme racial tumult in the USA and other White nations.
16 September, 2009 at 1:39 pm
Another big problem for the White race these days is White men dating little yellow Oriental women. What’s the matter a-hole, a White girl isn’t good enough for ya?
Is it my imagination or are people getting less attractive looking? There’s a lot of downbreeding going on these days, even within one’s own race. The smart, attractive, successful people will avoid or postpone having offspring because of the bad economy or because of their their careers, whereas ugly people don’t give a hang about such things and tend to breed like mice.
16 September, 2009 at 1:54 pm
“The smart, attractive, successful people will avoid or postpone having offspring because of the bad economy or because of their their careers……………….”
Why did I type the word “their” twice twice?
16 September, 2009 at 4:48 pm
” If you survey the White women who date/screw/marry Black men, you’ll find that nearly all of them are severely defective…. There are very occasional exceptions to this (Heidi Klum is one), but those are of course very rare.” — WP
Heidi Klum is regarded as a moron in Germany, so I am told. She has a television program there, and a German acquaintance (who’s very liberal, in fact) tells me there’s actually a club or organization that keeps track of her grammatical errors and idiotic bloopers. She’s not well educated, considered sort of a “hillbilly” (as he put it) by German standards, and apparently she’s regarded as a national joke. He laughingly dismissed her, saying that she’s from Gelsenkirchen, which evidently is considered Germany’s equivalent to Dogpatch.
However, I wouldn’t so cavalierly dismiss the effect that these race-mixing women (or men) have on society. You may say their numbers are only a few, but the effect goes far beyond their numbers alone. When they marry a black, or have a mongrel by one, then their whole family feels compelled to defend that situation. So it’s not just her, but HER ENTIRE FAMILY that become defenders and supporters of race mixing. Also, once those genes have entered the gene pool, they spread out like a bottle of ink poured into a bucket of clear water. Within a few generations, they have a far-reaching effect, polluting everything they touch, contaminating the whole bucket.
I would never dismiss the problem by saying it’s only a few. Even a few are way too many.
Oh, as for white MEN hooking up with Oriental women: you see A LOT of that in Europe, especially in the Germanic countries, from Sweden to Switzerland. I don’t understand why or what’s going on there, but it’s a fad. I don’t know what he sees in her, but she must please him when the lights are out. And they’re not just dating, they have families. It’s sad when you see a big, tall, blond Viking type with a little 4 ft. Vietnamese or Thai wife, and their string of little kids, none of whom will ever look like their dad.
16 September, 2009 at 4:55 pm
“When they marry a black, or have a mongrel by one, then their whole family feels compelled to defend that situation. So it’s not just her, but HER ENTIRE FAMILY that become defenders and supporters of race mixing.”
On further thought, I could add that it probably includes their friends and neighbors as well. If it’s a small town, it could include the whole town. If it’s someone famous, like Heidi Klum, it could include the whole city of Gelsenkirchen, proud and protective of their local girl who made good.
16 September, 2009 at 5:14 pm
Irma Grese said: “I must be unusual then, Adam, as I would rather cut out my own uterus with a rusty butterknife or BOOM! HEADSHOT myself before I would get busy with a kike, a spic or *BLAAAARRGGHH* a bubble-lipped, blue gummed buck nigger! So not just NO but HELLS NO, in my case at least!”
Irma: I second that. (BTW I always enjoy your posts, you seem to really articulate the real fact of the matter).
I’ve never understood the attraction to Mestizos, Congoids or Asians, ick! I usually see quite a bit of race-mixing when I attend a local street fair. It’s usually the same MO, white trash women with blacks or mexicans, and white guys with Asians.
Earlier this spring I attended the local Scottish festival. It was nirvana. All white folks. No crime, no thugs and in fact, not one sheriff officer was there, wasn’t needed. Tall swarthy manly men walked around with swords, drank beer, but no fighting or no crime and I stayed both days. I told my friend that came with me, this is what an all white America would look like. She’s now on board with me as far as white nationalism.
Those fashion mags? I stopped reading them years ago. Most of the high fashion designers are gay men who hate women. They want all white women to look like an adolescent boy or a floozy with tits on a stick. Most of the photos are airbrushed to erase every single flaw.
16 September, 2009 at 6:58 pm
ein Says:
However, I wouldn’t so cavalierly dismiss the effect that these race-mixing women (or men) have on society. You may say their numbers are only a few, but the effect goes far beyond their numbers alone. When they marry a black, or have a mongrel by one, then their whole family feels compelled to defend that situation. So it’s not just her, but HER ENTIRE FAMILY that become defenders and supporters of race mixing.
Ein is absolutely correct.
This kind of “propaganda of the deed” is probably at least as important as any of the more ordinary sort we see every day in the media. It would be interesting to know the amount of nominally white American families who have at least one non-white member, as it would provide a useful index to the extent of the transformation of America into a non-white country. But of course statistics are not readily obtainable. It’s something that white America would prefer not to think about. Yet these families effectively become non-white when this happens. Any families with non-white members, particularly half-breed children, are going to be hostile to us and probably worse than Jews in their support for further race mixing. As Ellul says so well in his book on propaganda:
Since the Census Bureau last year revised its estimate of when whites are going to become a minority in America downwards, to 2042 from 2050, I wonder what that figure would become if it were based on families, especially if “white” families with one or more non-white members are counted as non-white? Calculating that way, it could well be that whites are in the minority in America already.
If so, it kinda helps explain how a Kenyan nigger got elected President, don’t it?
16 September, 2009 at 10:25 pm
Thanks to Socrates for bringing this topic to the fore, as it is symptomatic of a larger issue that all too many of us have been avoiding for all too long.
Peter Schank made a critically astute observation:
I might add, as well:
In an earlier GoyFire, (loosely paraphrased) Alex Linder noted:
in reply:
Schank and Linder noted that “none of this is by accident.”
They are correct.
The only metaphor I can offer is from “The Matrix.”
We have all swallowed the blue pill – not just once, but thousands of times a day,
In effect, I have argued, the Culture War is now to the point that far too many of us are literally fighting insanity, as our thoroughly Jew-filled Mind fights what our Senses are literally tell it.
THIS is the cause for the incredible demand for prescription tranquilizers, alcohol, and escapist “entertainment” – all Jewish controlled, as VNNers know all too well.
So, the Jews drive us insane, and then, they offer us the tools they control – at a profit – to stop us from getting mad enough to actually Do Something about it.
Women are escaping ever further into a world of vampires and werewolves – a rapidly growing niche market, particularly with the tween market.
The (all but thoroughly gelded) “Men” have also internalized blue pill values, and watch sports – ESPN, PPV “wrestling” and MMA matches, as well as video games and computer “games” note the tremendous demand for World of Warcraft, HALO, and Eve.
And THAT takes us to George Sodini, whose life is a useful microcosm for the soil from which White Nationalism must spring.
Google his name; he’s the “LA Fitness” killer, who shot and killed exercising women at a fitness club outside Pittsburgh.
Why is Sodini’s life so useful for us?
Simple.
From what I can tell – and i haven’t looked into his online videos or website – Sodini played by The Rules, worked hard, bettered himself, and ticked off all of the boxes needed to ticket-punch his way into Manhood.
Externally, as a matter of Form, he had a lot to offer potential girlfriends.
Internally, as a matter of Substance, he didn’t.
From what I can tell, Sodini’s rage was a reaction to his, well, ineffectiveness in meeting and attracting women.
So, he took it out on the women who, in his mind, were of the type that should have sought his attentions.
George did what he was told to do, to be “successful.”
George colored “inside the lines” given to him by Others, whose opinions he trusted.
When checking off all the boxes – good job? CHECK career? CHECK good car? CHECK good clothes? CHECK – didn’t “earn” him the right to the attentions of worthwhile women, he, somehow, just lost it, and went after them with a gun, finally turning the weapons on himself, fatally.
George was, like so many White Men are becoming, “blue-pilled” to death; his own death, and those who we, AS A RESPONSE TO HIS PERSONAL INEFFECTIVENESS, wanted to have power over.
“George Sodini” happens everyday, in microcosm, in the White Community,
Too many have played by “The Rules” as they were blue-pilled to us.
Too many have been taught to blame themselves, and their Ancestors, for all that is wrong in the world.
Too many, then, wondering why the rewards from ticking off all of the boxes of the checklist have yet to materialize, further internalize the Values of our Racial Enemies, and “blue-pill” themselves even further, to redouble their efforts on the hamster wheel.
Can you think of anyone else, real or imaginary, I have referred to in my description of what has gone horribly wrong with White Nationalism?
Overweight, bald, professional “Nice Guy,” professional LOSER.
Charlie Brown, of Peanuts’ “Charlie Brown and the Football” fame.
Sodini, and Charlie Brown, both chasing what Linder called the paste jewel of middle-class respectability.
Both having the football pulled away at the last second, and facing deep humiliation.
Both getting back on the hamster wheel, and redoubling their efforts.
It takes raw Creative Destructive Power, which only the Masculine can Form and Channel, to literally break through the blue pill distractions, and their accompanying addictions, all designed to insure you – that’s YOU, White Man! – remain on the hamster wheel.
And, of course, more blue pills require more alcohol, more prescription tranquilizers, more powerful and exciting distractions to keep you from realizing how powerful the blue pills are, and how all-controlling your acceptance of the hamster wheel is.
What do you do when you are trapped in a revolving glass door?
Metzger, in a masterpiece of non-linear Insight, had the answer:
“BREAK THE DAMN GLASS!”
What do you replace the Blue-Pill Reality with?
How about something much damn better?
THIS is why I make continued reference to Harold Covington’s Northwest Republic, his Northwest Republic Quarter of books, and the Northwest Republic Analytical Model.
A century of control of the mass communications systems, the mass educational systems, and the mass financial system, have made America was we knew it something for the history books.
To quote Covington (from “A Distant Thunder”:
We have replaced Ozzie and Harriet, with Ozzie Osbourne.
THINK of what manner of social control had to take place to something like THAT to happen!
THINK of George Sodini, raised by “Ozzie and Harriet” America rules, trying to move forward socially in an Ozzie Osbourne America?
And, to tie this back to my opening, remember the astute observation of Peter Schank:
“The Goal has been to destroy the Warrior Caste, and then the potential Warrior Caste.”
World War II, the Korean Police Action, Vietnam, and Iraq have done an amazing job of the first, and the mass media/mass education system have done a great job of the second.
And you wonder why far too many of the women have surrendered to the first opportunistic Masculine predator that comes along, dreadlocks and all?
Simple.
No REAL Men around for them.
They are all trapped in the Blue-Pill Reality, and are on the hamster wheel, or are trapped in the glass revolving door.
Ask George Soidini about that.
Comments welcome.
Oh, by the way, once again, check out my new sig:
16 September, 2009 at 11:28 pm
Here’s an interesting phenomenon: Why is it if a White person finds out he had an American Indian as a grandfather (for example), he would think it was cool? Raquel Welch, Cher, Burt Reynolds……..A lot of Whites with Indian ancestry like to promote that fact. But if they find out they had a Negro in their family history, they would be so ashamed they would NEVER admit it. Despite decades of Jew brainwashing about the Negro’s supposed greatness, no one will ever really beleive it, not even the most effete, PC urban liberal.
And as far a Germany is concerned, many frauleins, unfortunately, mated with Negro US soldiers after WWII. That was probably Eisenhower’s idea. I don’t know the percentage of frauleins who did that terrible thing, but even if it was a small number, that turd is still floating around in the German genetic puch-bowl. A turd is still a turd, no matter how small.
17 September, 2009 at 12:04 am
If rich, I’d give 50-yard line football tickets and some money for concessions to about 50 ugly, stinking, filthy ghetto niggers/niglets to fill up 3 consecutive rows, and just let them wallow in broad sight of all the dumb mid-upper class whites who go to these games and watch niggers on the field.
SPECTATOR SPORTS ARE JUST SEMITICALLY-CORRECT PATRIOTISM. That’s why whites flock to them. Jews are the commissioners of all major sports, and heavily own the NFL and NBA.
17 September, 2009 at 4:35 am
“It would be interesting to know the amount of nominally white American families who have at least one non-white member, as it would provide a useful index to the extent of the transformation of America into a non-white country.
…these families effectively become non-white when this happens. Any families with non-white members, particularly half-breed children, are going to be hostile to us and probably worse than Jews in their support for further race mixing.”
………………………
Exactly! I first became aware of this, some years ago, with Puerto Ricans I knew, such as those I worked with. These people were white, or certainly they passed as such. But when they got together with family members — such as for a picnic, wedding, funeral — then you would see their colored relatives and in-laws, and it became clear that there was hardly a family that did not have some colored members in it. I can’t emphasize that enough. You never really knew who you were dealing with. And, of naturally, they were sympathetic to race-mixing and were going to defend their relatives, so you had to watch any little thing you said.
Thus, as Adam says, when one of their members crosses over the line. “the whole family effectively becomes non-white.” They have left the race. They are gone. And that means they have much greater numbers than just the individual ones you see in public, who are obvious. A white family with even one non-white member becomes, in effect, lost to us.
“He who acts in obedience to propaganda can never go back. He is now obliged to believe in that propaganda because of his past action. He is obliged to receive from it his justification and authority, without which his action will seem to him absurd or unjust, which would be intolerable. “
When I see a white woman sitting in a restaurant (which is quite often), alone with her little mulatto offspring, no husband anywhere in sight, but sometimes also the adoring (white) grandmother present, both of them dedicated to raising this little cuckoo bird that was dropped in their nest, it’s obvious that the mother, however abandoned she feels, however unhappy she is, however difficult her life, can NEVER now admit her mistake. She is stuck with it now and has to follow through. She will be angrily defensive of her choice and will have to justify it for the rest of her life. Otherwise, to admit her error would be to admit she had been a thoughtless fool. So she will defend her mistake with all the passion of a fanatic. And so will her family. For her, for them, there is no going back. They are no longer “white”.
17 September, 2009 at 5:03 am
“Women are escaping ever further into a world of vampires and werewolves – a rapidly growing niche market, particularly with the tween market.”
I assume you mean that literally, though it’s hard for me to believe it’s true. It’s difficult for me to comprehend how anyone could fall for such nonsense. It’s something more suitable for Haiti. But I must admit that I’ve been noticing lately, more and more references to vampires everywhere… such as posters for movies, TV shows. It’s sick and it’s weird. This morbid escapism doesn’t reflect well on the health of our culture. It’s not fitting for a healthy, civilized people.
17 September, 2009 at 9:03 am
Women’s fascination with vampires goes back a long way. The TV series Dark Shadows featured a vampire character that female fans were so crazy about, they would write to the actor asking him to bite them on the neck (unfortunately for them, he was a homosexual). Some new young actor has made a name for himself recently by playing a “hot” vampire. And then there was that hit movie a few years back, Interview with a Vampire, starring Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise. And of course, The Lost Boys, back in 1987. The Jews in Hymiewood should come up with a movie about a sexy female vampire for the guys. Maybe Angelina could star in it.
17 September, 2009 at 2:12 pm
“The Jews in Hymiewood should come up with a movie about a sexy female vampire for the guys. Maybe Angelina could star in it.”
A perfect choice!
And wasn’t there someone called Vampira?
http://www.unpleasantdreams.com/vampira
17 September, 2009 at 4:21 pm
“Women of a defeated race will bed down with the butchers of their former husbands, brothers, and fathers ….Females try to enhance their own individual reproductive fitness by genetically assimilating themselves to the victors. ….From the point of view of the woman’s genes, strong racism would be counter-productive, since it would disqualify her from breeding with males of a [conquering] race that is not her own…… To sum up, women maximize their reproductive fitness BY SURVIVING AND BREEDING with high-status men OF ANY RACE. “
As I re-read the above words of Adam, I am AGAIN very impressed with their insightfulness. Very astute, Adam! Women are thus, because of their unique biology, in a reproductive siituation which is innately quite different from that of men. Their reproductive interests and strategies must necessarily be different also. As lliving creatures, we all must seek to get our genes into the next generation or our line will perish; but women must do it in their own way, whatever way is most productive for them. For a female, the best, most effective, way is to attatch herself to a high-status male who will be able to give her the best protection, and the most advantages to her offspring. If he goes down in defeat to a challenger, she will attatch herself to the victor and mate with him. We see this everywhere in the animal kingdom: the vanquished alpha-male sulks off in defeat, and the new king of the herd claims the females for his own harem. They do not object to their new master, and the old one is forgotten. Among humans, it’s less blatant but no less true. As I said before, it all comes down to biology, genes, and survival; and Mother Nature has no scruples. Her only rule is to survive and reproduce.
Thus, a woman is loyal, first of all, to her own genes, before her own race. That would explain the blonde babes on the arms of black millionaire sports “heros” who look like something out of the Congo or escaped from the zoo. It would explain the German frauleins who hooked up with black Amrican GIs who had food rations and chocolate bars to offer a starving population.
Even if the woman is a fat, stoned, white-trash junkie, her “man” (if he’s a pusher or pimp) ranks as a high-status male within the depraved standards of his own culture. Within that culture, he can give her protection. He may beat her and abuse her and exploit her, but he’ll prevent other males from doing so. She feels protected.
Males seek adventure, but females seek security. A female who’s pregnant, or with young children, is vulnerable. She needs a strong protector & provider. Looking at evolution — going back beyond the caves all the way to the savannahs and the trees — females sought security (i.e. status) for themselves and, above all, for their children (who were their genetic investment in the future). They and their children needed protection from other males and other tribes. A strong, high-status male was her best protection.
In the Middle Ages, the jackpot (for a female) was to marry a title, and the dream of every Cinderella was to find her priince. [Males had to go forth in the world and carve out a place for themselves on their own; females advanced themselves through marriage.] In today’s commercial world, the jackpot is to marry a millionaire. No difference. A woman may feel attracted to the handsome young fellow who parks her car, but in the end she will marry the withered millionaire who can give her comfort and security. If that millionaire is a Jew or even a Negro, it may not matter greatly, not enough to deter her — especially after being indoctrinated all her life about the evil of “racism”, the worthlessness of whites, and the wonderful qualities of “minorities”.
18 September, 2009 at 1:00 am
Thanks again, ein. You’ve apprehended completely what I was trying to convey. The genetic interests of women explain their behavior, and also our racist behavior as men. Blut und Ehre, blood and honor, are a male thing about which women have fundamentally no clue.
The view that human beings are only “meat robots”, constructed by genes via the process of evolution to aid in their replication and dissemination is one developed at length by Richard Dawkins in his 1976 book The Selfish Gene. The central concept is that genes only “care” about their own survival into the next generation, hence the title. It’s a good read. This way of looking at matters explains a lot of what we see around us today, both at the level of group and individual behaviors.
18 September, 2009 at 2:14 am
Adam astutely states:
“Woman is capricious, childlike, and easily led astray, but through her gateway came all of our ancestors, and will come all of our posterity. The white woman is the temple of our race, and the white man is the priest. It is the duty of the priest to guard the temple. If the temple is destroyed, who shall we blame?”
By God, the Jews know this. Why else do you think that a (racial) Jew can only be born of a Jewish mother? They figured this shit out a long time ago.
18 September, 2009 at 2:27 am
I’ve noticed a phenomenon of Evolution that isn’t discussed very often…………………When a young, childless woman is sexually attracted to a guy, he’s almost always going to be a good-looking, though completely narcissistic or irresponsible, immature dope whom she unconciously wants to sire her offspring, so that they too will be good-looking. But once those offspring are born, she will often discard the good-looking, conceited jerk who impregnated her and search for another guy based not on looks, but rather on his ability to be a good father to her child/children. That happens a lot, I suspect, yet Society doesn’t recognize it or approve of it, even though it would seem to be a part of the natural reproduction and parenting process.
18 September, 2009 at 3:24 am
Tim McGreen Says:
I’ve noticed a phenomenon of Evolution that isn’t discussed very often…………………When a young, childless woman is sexually attracted to a guy, he’s almost always going to be a good-looking, though completely narcissistic or irresponsible, immature dope whom she unconciously wants to sire her offspring, so that they too will be good-looking. But once those offspring are born, she will often discard the good-looking, conceited jerk who impregnated her and search for another guy based not on looks, but rather on his ability to be a good father to her child/children. That happens a lot, I suspect, yet Society doesn’t recognize it or approve of it, even though it would seem to be a part of the natural reproduction and parenting process.
Women can sense good genes in a prospective mate that will increase the survival potential of their future offspring and they respond accordingly. It happens a lot, and it’s often something that’s known only to the mother, if geneticists are to be believed.
Also noteworthy in this connection are children of rape victims. Reliable statistics are hard to come by, but my impression after having researched the available information on the web led me to conclude that an extremely high number (i.e., 70% or so) of raped women who become pregnant from the rape choose to keep the baby. This is a truly perverse outcome, especially when you consider that a large proportion of these women were probably raped by niggers or spics. But then the impulse to reproduce, and the sex response in general, has nothing to do with being rational. It’s buried much deeper in the genetic programming.
17 December, 2010 at 4:23 pm
Adam, you say, “Blut und Ehre, blood and honor, are a male thing about which women have fundamentally no clue.”
Yeah? You think all women think about is whether or not their genes will get passed along? Wrong. There are still some good white girls our there who wouldn’t water down their blood with a nigger or whatever just too pass along genes. Women don’t understand the phrase “Blut und Ehre,” eh? Then what the hell is my excuse for NEVER thinking of doing such a thing and disowning all that do?
The idea that NS men send out to women- that they are weak and inferior- is exactly the reason why women don’t want to stand up and fight with you.